Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

The Limits to Toeing the Party Line

In our Selected Exhortations category, we republish interesting stuff such as must-read articles and essays not originally written exclusively for the blawg, and which have come to our attention. Please feel free to email loyarburokker@loyarburok.com if you would like to reproduce your writing, but first follow our Writer's Guide here.

This post by Galvin Wong was first published here.

The recent debacle between the DAP and its vice-chairman Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim really sparked my interest and got me thinking. My thoughts however centred not on his arguments but how the DAP reacted to the public breach of his party's stand, of his failure to toe the party line. A strong reaction ensued.

A few days ago, it was reported that he was being investigated by the DAP's disciplinary body. Just yesterday, it was reported that he'd be dropped as a senator when his term came to an end.

The concept of toeing the party line is not new or uncommon. It's used in both Australia and Britain and in Malaysia itself; it's a common practice. It refers to publicly agreeing and supporting a party's decision whatever it may be. There are, of course, certain advantages to this practice. Namely, it presents a united front via a single-minded focus on a certain issue. However, there are severe disadvantages as well.

Such a political culture requires strict party discipline. Strict discipline allows the party leader more freedom to choose whose views he intends to accept, as no one would risk prematurely ending his or her political career by publicly disagreeing with his decision, and he would select an elite few who'd have his ear. The selection of a specific view that the party will take leads to other views within the party being disregarded. However, if only the views from certain power players in the party are favoured, others may feel marginalised. This might lead to discontent and quite possibly internal rifts and arguments that'll destabilise a party.

One other tremendous disadvantage to this system is the fact that the MPs are required to vote according to their party's stand in Parliament. Malaysia's a representative democracy. And the core purpose of the MPs in this system is to represent the rakyat who've elected them. However, partisan politics have very much taken over. As such, an MP's role in Parliament has shifted from voting based on their constituents' interest, to voting based on their party's interest.

Such an occurrence has very much reduced the directness and effectiveness of the input citizens have in policy-making, making Malaysia much less of a democratic country. Remember, a democracy is about the rule of the majority. And MPs toeing the party line is more along the lines of ruling by the minority, due to the fact that it's mainly the party decision-makers that have more input into the country's policies.

How then do we correct this situation? The answer's simple. We must deviate back to the core purpose of a representative democracy — i.e, to represent. Parties must begin to realise that the people's interests are best represented when decisions about Bills in Parliament aren't made by those in the party's core leadership, but by the people themselves. MPs need to start going to the ground once again to speak and receive feedback from constituents, and they need to begin voting based on the interests of the community they represent!

Not merely toeing the party line would also ensure that MPs representing minority groups in Sabah and Sarawak get to have their fair say in policy-making. Bills will have to be formed with the minority groups' interests in mind before being passed, because only then would these Bills receive the 'yes' vote from the MPs in Sabah and Sarawak.

Also, Bills that put into place policies that a party has put forth in its manifesto, no longer need to be mired in protracted debate and political point-scoring. The rakyat would already have agreed to such policies when they elect the government. This will save time (which is limited) during parliamentary sessions  for Bills that are important and crucial, thus ensuring that the recent situation (where Parliament had to debate a high number of Bills on its last day) doesn't happen as it led, unnecessarily, to accusations by the Opposition of certain Bills being forced through without sufficient scrutiny.

I'm not suggesting that the culture of toeing the party line must be completely abolished. To a large extent, this political culture is needed to ensure that a party doesn't fall apart because of undisciplined individuals. What I am suggesting is that the principle of how an MP must vote in Parliament based on a party's stand must be reverted. MPs are willing to fight tooth and nail in the name of the rakyat. But is it truly their constituents they're representing, or their parties?

(Featured image accompanying article on the main page courtesy of Ian Britton, source: http://bit.ly/IL619K)

Recommended Reads:

Security Machines at Istana Kehakiman

REFSA Rojak: Crisps of the Week (3-9 Dec)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Galvin is an 18 year old who believes that voting is a right with responsibility attached to it. He had wanted a lot to express his views but had no idea how to until he stumbled upon this website called LoyarBurok.com. He enjoys writing in his free time and has a manic obsession with football tactics.

Posted on 12 May 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by Galvin Wong.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Paradise lost for Tunku Aziz? — Tay Tian Yan

MAY 12 — As widely expected, Tunku Abdul Aziz's senatorship was not extended by the DAP.

As if that is not enough, he also finds himself coming under scornful assaults and branded a traitor. The disciplinary committee demanded an explanation from him, and some in the party wanted him removed.

Tunku Abdul Aziz joined the DAP three years ago in the midst of widespread cheers, making him the highest positioned and most reputed Malay member the DAP had had since its inception.

He was offered the party's vice-presidency, and thanks to his popularity, the party experienced unprecedented metamorphosis to become a truly multiracial entity.

The cold treatment accorded to him has stemmed solely from his dissident views on the Berish 3.0 rally.

I have no intention of getting myself embroiled in the rally controversy any more. All that has come to my mind is a story I have read some time ago.

John Milton was a 17th-century English writer, second probably only to William Shakespeare in literary supremacy. His time-honoured epic "Paradise Lost" underscored the fall of humanity in the pursuit of freedom, quoting the chapter in Genesis where Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden.

In "Paradise Lost" there are the Heaven, the Hades; the Angels, the Satan; the Darkness, the Light; the Exaltation, the Decadence.

Wasn't the April 28 rally a vivid reflection of "Paradise Lost"?

Milton had his own real-life experiences.

He met, fell for and later married 15-year-old Mary Powell at the age of 32.

After their marriage, he discovered they could not actually get along well. His young wife went back to her mother's house, not returning for the following three years.

He wanted to put an end to the dysfunctional marriage, but was barred from doing so by the Church then.

Out of desperation he penned the famous Divorce Tracts, declaring true matrimony to be a marriage of body and mind, but if the body and mind have become dissociated, people should no longer be bonded by the covenant of marriage as this would contravene human nature and the will of freedom.

As such, he said, everyone should be entitled to the freedom of divorce.

His doctrine could possibly be accepted by people today, but not three centuries ago.

He was suppressed and locked up for his heretical thinking.

Milton was least subdued, instead his ordeal energised him to think profoundly about the true meaning of freedom. In the "Areopagitica" he later published, he proposed the theory of self-rectification of truth, arguing that only with the freedom of speech would truth become more explicit with arguments. The so-called "truth" that has been erected through oppression would never be able to pass the test of time and become the real truth.

At the same time, Milton also advocated the freedom of thought, declaring that no one — be it a regime, political party or individual — has the privilege of scrutinising a person's freedom of speech or thought on condition it does not pose any harm to other people.

Milton's freedom of speech has since become the harbinger of democratic politics.

Like anyone else in this world, Tunku Abdul Aziz is entitled to the freedom of speech, and the DAP's action against him only attests to the democratic qualities and bearings this party holds. — mysinchew.com

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Wanted Bersih man high on wanted list & Polis cipta peserta hantu...



A possible mistake of releasing mugshots of the same individual four times in the wanted list of 141 Bersih protesters was uncovered by netizens, bringing blushes to the police.

This, after the force had come under heavy criticism for the harsh crackdown on the Bersih April 28 rally.



NONEThe protester who is believed to be a PAS Unit Amal member, sports a chubby face, was found appearing four times in the batch of photos issued by the police on May 9.

The photos were labelled number 7, 15, 18 and 21.


The first
Facebook user who spotted the similarity is believed to be Mohd Nor Amin Zainuddin.

He posted a comment in Kuala Lumpur police
Facebook at 2.59pm on the same day the photos were uploaded, saying that "the pictures no 7, 15, 18 and 21 are of the same individual."

Fun time for netizens

Soon after, some Facebook users took turns to poke fun at the photos, with Atie Hazie writing that "The no 15 (picture) is not yet hot... no 18 (picture) has inflated because burning..."

The pictures later went viral on
Facebook and some netizens have taken this turn of events as proof of police "unprofessionalism".

NONEThe officer in charge of the wanted list at the Kuala Lumpur Criminal Investigation Department ASP Azmi Aziz appeared to be ignorant of what had happened when contacted by Malaysiakini reporter, only saying! that "I will look into it".

However, PAS Unit Amal chief Juhari Osman (
left) said the episode is proof that the police are going on a "fishing expedition" with the authorities having no concrete evidence to prove the protesters' guilt.

He accused the police of waging "psychological warfare", using the photos to intimidate them into feeling that they had committed some offence or other.

 
PAS contemplating legal action

"We have gotten advice from our lawyers - when the protesters surrender themselves, they should not be deemed as guilty. The police only can record their statement, but not arrest them."

NONEHe also wondered why many Unit Amal members were included in the wanted list.

Juhari said he will consult with party lawyers on further action over the issue.

 
Since May 3, the police have released several batches of photographs purportedly depicting individuals involved in wrongdoing during the Bersih rally, totalling 141.

The police have given those on the list a one-week ultimatum to come forward and assist in their investigation, or they will go to the homes of the wanted individuals.- malaysiakini



Innocent people sought by police, laments DAP

The police's list of 141 individuals wanted over the Bersih 3.0 rally has come under fire for comprising a number who are allegedly innocent.

DAP at a press conference today brought forward a Hindraf leader, one of the 141, to back their claims that the wanted list is erroneous.

Hindraf's V Ganabatirau (left), who is also Selangor DAP state committee member, was in one of the photos on the police wanted list released on May 4, and was brought to the KL police headquarter two days ago for a three-hour interrogation.

He said he was accused of breaking police barricades placed at the intersection between Jalan Raja and Jalan Tun Perak during the mammoth rally for electoral reform.


However, he claims that the photograph of him was taken at around 1pm, before the commotion began.

 
"By the time the commotion started at 3pm, I had already gone to have my lunch," he claimed.

Ganabatirau, an Internal Security Act (ISA) detainee over the 2007 Hindraf rally, said the police had asked about the object he was seen holding in the photo, to which he duly replied that it was a microphone.


NONE"They asked me what I was doing; I said singing Bersih songs.

Ganabatirau said from the line of questioning, the police seemed to be gathering information on his upcoming protest on Indian poor, dubbed Indraf 2.0, rather than Bersih 3.0.

"They kept asking me whether I am going to hold the rally at Dataran Merdeka. When I said it will be in Brickfields, they seemed so relieved," he said.

The police released him on the same day without indicating any charges.

'Victimising innocent protestors'


Ganabatirau's experience as well as recent reports on certain wanted individuals showed that the police are victimising innocent protestors in a bid to paint Bersih 3.0 as riot, said Petaling Jaya Utara! MP Tony Pua, who chaired the press conference.

 
NONEHe urged the police to spare the innocent suspects unnecessary interrogation and immediately commence a probe on police brutality that is backed by copious evidence.

"So far only one blur picture of a police (offender) was released. Instead of arresting that guy, they are asking the public to help them to identify who is he.

"This is a joke," said Pua.

Commenting on the newly set up independent panel to probe violence during Bersih 3.0, Pua said the appointment of former inspector-general of police Hanif Omar as its head proves that it will not be an independent panel.

"It is a clear case of a cover up by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, the panel and the police," he said.

DAP also advised individuals on the wanted list who did not commit any offence during Bersih 3.0 to exercise their right to sue the government for defamation.- malaysiakini


Police brutality 'victims' stage small demo




Peserta BERSIH muncul 4 kali dalam senarai polis...

Pengguna Internet mengenalpasti terdapat wajah berganda individu dikehendaki polis bagi membantu siasatan berhubung insiden dalam perhimpunan BERSIH 28 April lalu.

Mereka mengesan wajah seorang individu muncul empat kali dalam senarai 141 orang yang! dikehen daki.


NONE'Pendedahan' itu dikeluarkan selepas pihak berkuasa dikritik hebat ekoran penggunaan kekerasan ketika menyuraikan perhimpunan itu.

Peserta perhimpunan, dipercayai anggota Unit Amal PAS yang kelihatan gempal muncul empat kali dalam wajah yang dikeluarkan polis pada 9 Mei.

Gambarnya dilabel dengan nombor 7, 15, 18 dan 21.

Pengguna Facebook yang mengecam kesamaan itu dipercayai bernama Mohd Nor Amin Zainuddin.

Beliau mengeposkan komen itu di Facebook polis pada t 2.59 petang pada hari yang sama gambar itu dimuatnaik.
- malaysiakini



cheers.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

A lesson in the Bill that was withdrawn — Lim Mun Fah

MAY 12 — The Cabinet decided to withdraw the controversial Election Offences Amendment Bill 2012. DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang expressed the Pakatan Rakyat's support for the government's decision.

I can still remember that the Bill was tabled at 2am on April 20 and hastily passed when the Dewan Rakyat froze the time at 11.59pm on April 19. A total of 22 Bills were passed at that time.

Such a hasty parliamentary operation is undoubtedly contrary to the spirit of democracy. Lawmaking is the most sacred and solemn task of Parliament. Lawmakers must ensure every item and detail of a Bill have been given sufficient time and space to review, debate, question, clarify, add on and amend to make it close to perfect before they vote.

Facts have proven that our Parliament has neglected its duty. Those bleary-eyed lawmakers who had raised their hands in confusion that day had failed to live up to their responsibility as people's representatives. They found that the Election Offences Amendment Bill was actually full of absurd flaws only after they woke up from sleep.

After the Bill was hastily passed, Bersih rally co-chairperson Datuk S. Ambiga said angrily that four amendments in the Bill would have a far-reaching impact and to a very large extent, they have rejected the candidate's right to monitor voter's identities, or it would cause ghost voters and multiple voting, which was tantamount to advocating dirty politics. She also predicted that the next general election would be the dirtiest election in history.

The contentious points of the Bill included the removal of the provision requiring printed campaign material to carry the name and address of the printer and publisher. Ambiga said that it would open the door for a dirty election. She said that she was not nitpicking as such a "relaxation" move would indeed in effect encourage those with malicious intentions to print publications with defamatory as well as racial and gender discrimination words.

Another controversial point was, expanding the exclusion zone for non-authorised persons from 50m to 100m at polling stations and not allowing election agents or candidates to be present at election booths. Those opposing the amendments believed that it would make it more difficult to monitor the vote delivery and calculation process. The suspicion is reasonable.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz said that the government fully accepted the proposal and tabled it in Parliament because it did not want to interfere with the EC's independent status. The government merely played the role of a postman in the whole process. Such an argument is hardly acceptable. It is because the so-called independent status should not go beyond principles like fairness, justification, reasonableness, freedom and democracy. Moreover, the authority did not consult experts in the related field for professional advice before it was tabled. They did not reveal it to the public to collect views and opinions either. It had skipped the important process of "listening" in the process of democracy implementation.

The Bill was hastily passed and hastily withdrawn. After witnessing a farce, we can only hope that Parliament has learned a lesson from it and not repeat the mistake, which will bring us another disappointment and the international community another joke! — mysinchew.com

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Bersih 3.0: The first test for the police under the Peaceful Assembly Act? — Maha Balakrishnan

Bersih 3.0: The first test for the police under the Peaceful Assembly Act? — Maha Balakrishnan

MAY 12 — At a press conference on April 29 and in reference to the Bersih 3.0 rally the day before, the prime minister was reported to have stated that "the rally was the first test for the police in translating the action stipulated under the new legislation following the political transformation implemented by the government, including….. introducing the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012".

The Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) came into force on April 23. The prime minister therefore had basis for saying that Bersih 3.0 was the first test for the police in translating the action stipulated under the PAA.

The question is: did the police pass or fail that test?

In my view, they failed. Here's why:

What powers do the police have under the PAA?

During the second reading of the Peaceful Assembly Bill 2012 in the Dewan Rakyat, the prime minister was reported to have said that in comparison to the situation existing at the time, under the PAA "the role of the police would change from granting permission to safeguarding the law and being facilitators with a clearer framework for accountability".

True enough, under sub-section 14(1) and section 15 of the PAA, all the police can now do when they receive a notification of an assembly is to impose restrictions and conditions on matters such as the date, time, duration, place and manner of the assembly. In other words, the police have no power under the PAA to approve or reject the holding of an assembly.

What did the police do with regard to Bersih 3.0?

Around April 5, Bersih 2.0's steering committee made a public announcement that they would be holding a sit-in rally (Duduk Bantah) between 2pm and 4pm on April 28 at Dataran Merdeka. The announcement was carried in most mainstream and online media at about the same time.

On April 16, the organisers of Bersih 3.0 wrote a letter to the Dang Wangi district police headquarters informing them of their intention to hold the rally at Dataran Merdeka on April 28 between 2pm and 4pm.

On April 23, the police responded in a letter stating that they did not approve the "application" apparently on "security" grounds. The exact words in their letter were "…Dukacita dimaklumkan setelah membuat penelitian, saya selaku Ketua Polis Daerah Dang Wangi tidak meluluskan di atas keselamatan permohonan puan untuk menganjurkan acara sepertimana yang dipohon."

In a nutshell, on receiving a notification of the Bersih 3.0 rally at Dataran Merdeka, the police rejected or refused permission for the rally, when they in fact did not have the power to do so under the PAA. All the police can do under sub-section 14(1) of the PAA is to impose any restrictions or conditions on the rally. No such restrictions or conditions were included in the letter dated April 23.

What then was the status of the Bersih 3.0 rally?

Here's the irony — because the police did not do the only thing that they were allowed to do under sub-section 14(1) of the PAA, which was to impose restrictions or conditions, then arguably under sub-section 14(2) of the PAA, Bersih 3.0 was entitled to proceed as the organisers intended, i.e. as a sit-in rally in Dataran Merdeka on April 28.

What of the court order that the police obtained on April 26?

The PAA does not give the police powers to apply for court orders to restrain the conduct of assemblies. The court order that the police obtained on April 26 was not under the PAA, but under the Criminal Procedure Code.

A mockery of the PAA and of the PM's promise to Malaysians

So there you have it, faced with their "first test" under the PAA, the police resoundingly failed. They not only acted in a manner they were not allowed to under the PAA, they also resorted to other laws to try to prevent the rally from proceeding.  

The conduct of the police begs the following questions — the PAA is supposed to form the rules of engagement between the police on the one hand, and organisers and participants of assemblies on the other. Why then are the police still using other laws to stop or control the conduct of public assemblies? If the PAA no longer gives the police power to reject a rally, surely the police cannot be allowed to circumvent the limits on their powers by resorting to other laws? Doesn't the conduct of the police make a mockery of the PAA and of the prime minister's promise to Malaysians?

The PAA was hailed by the prime minister as revolutionary. While there are many critics of the Act, there are many who praised it and saw it as a step towards taking our constitutional democracy to a higher and more mature plane. However, this first test under the PAA shows that the accolades the Act drew were premature at best. Far more worrying is the impression that the PAA is merely window-dressing, enacted by the administration to tout as evidence of its transformist credentials. When faced with a real situation however, both the police and the administration seemed to have reverted to type, and refused to abide by their own self-imposed limits.

On that note, I'll leave you with one other example of how police action in Bersih 3.0 breached the PAA. Section 24 of the Act says this: "Any media representative may have reasonable access to a place of assembly and use any equipment to report on the assembly."  

So much for seizure of camera equipment by police being standard operating procedure, Home Minister.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Malaysia’s sad media – Sam Peh

MAY 12 – Even during the most dictatorial days of Mahathir Mohamad, the mainstream media has not been this inept, corrupt, dishonest and even clumsy.

But during the Najib reign, the New Straits Times, the Star and the Malay language papers have crawled to depths never before experienced. Take today's NST.

Yesterday more than 1,200 lawyers voted at a Bar Council EGM to condemn police brutality at Bersih 3.0 but the Umno owned paper focussed on 16 little known lawyers who dissented. And to make matters worse, the report focussed on whether the quorum was reached (which it was) and whether all those who turned up were lawyers. What rubbish reporting.

I am making public this dishonest reporting because this is the stock in trade of the NST . Remember how the paper tried to stitch up Lim Guan Eng as unpatriotic and Senator Xenophon as anti-Islam.

In Malaysia, the health of newspaper follow that of who occupies Putrajaya and it is no coincidence that the NST and Star have stopped being newspapers and have become ragsheets for wrapping fish.

Najib Razak wants his papers supine. The Star will try and sound balanced but make no mistake, the editors and journalists at the MCA-owned paper are just as guilty of selling innuendo and vile stuff as news.

So my advice to the Bar Council is this. Start a boycott of the mainstream media. Team up with Bersih and other NGOs and get people to stop buying the paper. I have stopped buying papers and only read it online when someone draws attention to some ridiculous report.

The Bar Council has the moral standing to lead a campaign against the media. You have nothing to lose because you are already being demonised.

There is no downside because any newspaper which presents Perkasa, Zahrin as worthy of coverage does not deserve any support. Only contempt.

* Sam Peh reads The Malaysian Insider.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

REFSA Rojak: Crisps of the Week (4-10 May)

In our Selected Exhortations category, we republish interesting stuff such as must-read articles and essays not originally written exclusively for the blawg, and which have come to our attention. Please feel free to email loyarburokker@loyarburok.com if you would like to reproduce your writing, but first follow our Writer's Guide here.

Sandra Rajoo brings to you another edition of REFSA Rojak, a weekly take on the goings-on in Malaysia by Research for Social Advancement (REFSA).

REFSA Rojak – "trawl the newsflow, cut to the core and focus on the really pertinent. Full of flavour, lots of crunch, this is the concise snapshot to help Malaysians keep abreast of the issues of the day."

Blame NST if international relations between Malaysia and Australia are strained

When the master says 'Jump', an obedient servant asks 'How high?' But in the case of UMNO-controlled New Straits Times (NST), the obeisance became 'How low?". NST stooped to a new low last week in its blatant misrepresentation of the views of Australian senator Nicholas Xenophon.

Xenophon was part of an independent seven-member team overseeing Bersih 3.0. NST boldly attributed anti-Islamic sentiments to the gentleman in an apparent attempt to discredit him. Unfortunately for NST, the words in question were uttered in the Australian parliament, and the Hansard clearly records that Xenophon said, "Scientology is not a religious organisation. It is a criminal organisation that hides behind its so-called religious beliefs."

The paper later released an apology and retraction, but the damage to good relations between countries and to its own already tattered reputation is severe. We find it impossible to believe that the replacement of 'Scientology' with 'Islam' in the NST article is an honest mistake. NST may think it has scored some brownie points with its bosses but such barefaced lies usually have a way of coming back to bite you later.

Astro is just as guilty

Astro also seem to be afflicted by the same lack of professionalism disease. International news networks Al Jazeera and BBC filed complaints over the manner in which their YouTube videos and news reports on Bersih 3.0 were doctored on Astro. Quite an irony considering Astro recently won the 2012 Putra Brand of the Year award. Its unethical action brings into question the validity of the award.

Blacking out the truth in order to serve political masters

Blurring the line between truth and lie, substituting fact with fiction are not the only things mainstream media are good at; blacking out facts and reality is another speciality. There was no coverage of innocent victims' accounts of police aggression during Bersih 3.0, as well as police officers' harassment and violent assault on journalists, some of whom were from the mainstream media. The Star and New Straits Times ran riot with accounts of violent behaviour from some demonstrators, complete with expressions of horror, but  conveniently 'forgot' to publish accounts of the brutality perpetrated by law enforcers on members of their own profession who were just doing their jobs.

Malaysian media civil society organisations came out to condemn police brutality and listed the affected journalists: 1) Radzi Razak, from theSun, 2) Arif Kartono, a photographer with Malay Mail, 3) Wong Onn Kin, a photographer with Guang Ming Daily, 4) Koh Jun Lin, a photojournalist with Malaysiakini, 5) P. Malayandy, a photographer with Makkal Osai, 6) Al Jazeera correspondent Harry Fawcett,  7) Huang An Jian, a photographer with Guang Ming Daily, 8) Kenny Lew, Channel News Asia video cameraperson, 9) Chen Shaua Fui, assistant editor of Merdeka Review, 10) Lisa J Ariffin, a journalist with Malaysian Insider, 11) P Nathan, a photographer from The Star,

Hooligan-like behaviour exhibited by thugs is not surprising because, well, they are thugs. So what conclusion can we draw when the police act the same way?

Two issues of nuclear proportions

Not surprisingly, mainstream media have also blacked out citizens' concerns about Lynas, the potentially dangerous rare earth plant in Gebeng, Pahang. Citizens' arguments on the danger of rare earths processing, cutting corners and radioactive waste seeping into the water system etc. are given a wide berth. More coverage is instead given to Lynas' views.

The public are also probably not aware that the government plans to build 'two units of nuclear power plants' to develop nuclear energy by 2014. A coalition of NGOs called Malaysian Coalition Against Nuclear (MyCAN) started an online public petition objecting to this plan to develop nuclear energy.

The Scorpene has resurfaced

Another issue kept out of mainstream media and which captured the nation's imagination a few years back, may not remain submerged for long now that French prosecutors have jumped into the investigation. The cold, hard facts of Malaysia's purchase of two scorpene submarines in 2002 from French shipmaker DCN were splattered all over online media, but were whitewashed in the mainstream media.

NGO Suaram's perseverance to get to the bottom of the corruption that led to billions of ringgit lost and the murder of a Mongolian translator has to be commended. As co-operation from Malaysian authorities has not been forthcoming, Suaram lodged a complaint with the French courts. The latest that has emerged is that, in the said purchase, DCN allegedly paid '114 million euros in defence kickbacks to Perimekar', a company owned by Najib's political analyst and associate, Razak Baginda. A convoluted money trail aimed at covering the tracks of the perpetrators has been uncovered. A matter of public interest like this should be in all the media.

For those who thought they got away with murder (literally and figuratively), beware the deadly 'scorpene' sting. It is almost always fatal.

Journalistic principles at the mercy of politics

We are seeing more and more incidents of journalistic principles and ethics being compromised in the name of politics. The manipulation and doctoring of news reports can only cement the perception of mainstream media as unethical and unscrupulous organisations. Once established as unprincipled, redemption will be difficult. Regaining the trust of the public in the future will be tricky. Remember the boy who cried 'wolf'? Balanced and accurate reporting is what the public wants from all media. Let integrity, reliability and veracity return to journalism.

Why 'Rojak'? Disparate flavours and textures come together in a harmonious mix to make this delicious but underrated concoction. Our Rojak weekly is much like this mix, making sense of the noise of daily newsflow and politicking.

It is also our ultimate dream that our multi-ethnic melange of communities can be made richer within the unique 'sauce' that is Malaysia. Let's take pride in the 'rojakness' of our nation!

Click here for previous issues of REFSA Rojak.

Visit us at http://refsa.org | Like us on our Facebook page | Follow our tweets @inforefsa

(Featured image accompanying article on the main page courtesy of Ed Siasoco, source: http://bit.ly/JlaIfp)

Recommended Reads:

"The human spirit has proven for generations ...

Mkini - #tanyanajib: Thanks For The Giggles Mr PM ...

TMI: Boosted by social media, activists reclaim sp...

PPSMI: You Can't Keep Good People Down

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

REFSA is an independent, not-for-profit research institute providing relevant and reliable information on social, economic and political issues affecting Malaysians with the aim of promoting open and constructive discussions that result in effective policies to address those issues. Visit us at www.refsa.org

Posted on 12 May 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by Research for Social Advancement (REFSA).

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Pointless Protest

http://www.streetdirectory.com.my/stock_images/malaysia/simg_show/my_11817907220736/1/klang_bus_station/ 

Jetset 
 

I visited Petaling Street last Sunday and was amazed to find that more than 1,000 people had gathered to protest against the demolition of Bus Stand Klang, UO Superstore and Plaza Warisan for the construction of the MRT project.

 

From what I witnessed during the protest, one of the main arguments was that they considered the three buildings as heritage buildings. But how is this true? I do not see any point of categorizing these buildings as heritage as they are not even well maintained. In fact, the cleanliness level is horribly poor. I remember, a few years back while I was at Bus Stand Klang, all I could see was exhaust gas-stained walls and litter everywhere. If these buildings are heritage buildings, the authorities, or at least the people using them, should take good care of them. It's strange that these dilapidated relics should suddenly be viewed as "heritage" buildings when it suits certain people's interests.

 

Secondly, I do not understand why the protest will occur when the Government is basically demolishing their own buildings. The act is well within the boundaries of law. This is a democratic society and we can do whatever we want provided that it's within the boundaries of law. Many landowners in the area have revitalized or reconstructed their buildings in some ways throughout the years and no protest was held. Even the three buildings were developed before. It is almost unconceivable when someone considers a supermarket as a heritage building (UO superstore)!  

 

Can we stop the madness once and for all and get going with the project? MRT is needed, let's face it. Everywhere I travelled, I found that a public transport system cannot be stand-alone. It must be an entire eco-system of buses, trains, subways, trams, etc that are fully-linked and service virtually every area of a major city. They have to be well-built and well-maintained. They have to be well thought out so that upgrading works don't happen every few years. MRT is going to do the same for us. Yes, there will be pain for the ones who considered 'UO superstore as heritage building' now. But look at how much public transport helps users and businesses around the public transport hubs. In Hong Kon! g, major MRT stations have shopping malls built next to them or above them. Huge residential developments surround most (if not all) MRT stations. Why? Because commuting is easier, to work, to school, to the mall…less time is spent being stuck in traffic, less money is spent on petrol or taxi fares, and everyone is happier.

 

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Najib: Rakyat perlu terus hormati undang-undang

KUANTAN: Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak mengingatkan rakyat Malaysia supaya terus menghormati dan menyanjung tinggi undang-undang.

Beliau juga mengingatkan mereka supaya tidak melakukan kerosakan dan menyerang anggota keselamatan kerana mereka juga adalah manusia biasa yang mempunyai anak dan anggota keluarga.

"Kita juga telah diingatkan oleh Allah supaya tidak membuat kerosakan di muka bumi dan kita juga tahu anggota polis dan tentera pada hakikatnya adalah manusia biasa yang mempunyai anak, isteri dan keluarga.

"Kalau kita cederakan mereka, apa perasaaan anak-anak, isteri serta anggota keluarga mereka. Seoalah-olah orang yang menyerang pihak keselamatan ini seperti lupa yang mereka ini juga rakyat Malaysia," katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian pada majlis makan tengah hari dan penyampaian sumbangan oleh Yayasan Rahah sempena Kejohanan Golf Amal Parlimen Pekan di kem tersebut hari ini.

Turut hadir, Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Adnan Yaakob dan Panglima Kem 4 Briged Mekanize, Datuk Abdul Rahim Abdul Mutalib.

Perhimpunan aman

Najib dalam ucapannya turut berkata perhimpunan beramai-ramai boleh dianjurkan dengan syarat ia dilakukan secara aman tanpa berlaku perkara yang tidak diingini.

"Contohnya malam tadi pada perhimpunan sambutan ulang tahun Umno yang ke-66 di Bukit Jalil. Seramai 100,000 orang yang hadir dan terbukti pada negara, perhimpunan sebesar itu boleh berlangsung dalam keadaan yang aman dan tertib tanpa ada perkara yang tidak diingini berlaku," katanya.

Pada majlis itu, Najib turut meluluskan peruntukan RM3 juta bagi membina sebuah pusat komuniti di kem berkenaan di mana RM1 juta untuk tahun ini dan RM2 juta akan diberikan pada tahun depan.

Katanya pusat komuniti itu adalah bagi memenuhi keperluan aktiviti harian kira-kira 5,000 anggota keluarga pasukan keselamatan di kem berkenaan dan kem Tentera Udara Diraja Malaysia (TUDM) Kuantan.

Antara kemudahan yang akan ditempatkan di pusat komuniti itu nanti ialah pusat beli-belah, gimnasium, kafe siber dan kafeteria.

Pada majlis itu, Perdana Menteri turut menyampaikan sumbangan daripada Yayasan Rahah kepada kira-kira 300 penerima yang terdiri daripada pelajar-pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seri Mahkota dan Sekolah Kebangsaan Seri Wira, Kuantan, surau-surau dan Sekolah Agama Rakyat dan Persatuan Kebajikan Anak-Anak Yatim Negeri Pahang.

-Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Gambar2 Stadium Tak Penuh Perhimpunan UMNO

Akhbar harian hari ni memainkan slogan "Gelombang Merah". 

Ada harian nasional mengatakan kedatangan ke Perhimpunan UMNO itu sekitar 500 ribu manusia. Padahal kapasiti maksimum Stadium Bukit Jalil adalah 120k orang sahaja. 

Pokoknya mereka cuba menggambarkan perhimpunan UMNO semalam lebih ramai dari BERSIH 3.0. Tulang Besi berharap gambar2 di bawah ini dapat memberi gambaran sebenar berkaitan kedatangan perhimpunan UMNO semalam. 

HAKIKATNYA, perhimpunan semalam gagal memenuhkan Stadium Bukit Jalil, walaupun segala-galanya telah dilakukan untuk memenuhkannya. 

Rasanya kerusi kosong lagi ramai dari peserta

KLIK IMEJ
KLIK IMEJ

KLIK IMEJ
KLIK IMEJ
KLIK IMEJ
KLIK IMEJ
KLIK IMEJ
TULANG BESI

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Stubborn insistence to have Hanif to head probe into Bersih 3.0 violence raises larger question – whether time has come for a new PM and Home Minister as incumbents are so cut off from reasonable expectations of ordinary Malaysians

1 maut, 77 cedera bas bawa ahli Umno kemalangan

SEREMBAN: Seorang anggota Umno  maut, manakala 77 lagi cedera dalam kemalangan membabitkan dua buah bas dan sebuah lori treler di Kilometer 258.8 Lebuh Raya Utara Selatan arah Selatan berhampiran susur keluar ke Port Dickson, di sini awal hari ini.

Roha Dol, 79, anggota wanita Umno Batu Pahat, meninggal dunia semasa menerima rawatan di Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar di sini akibat kecederaan di kepala dan badannya.

Pengarah hospital berkenaan Dr Jaafar Che Mat berkata mangsa disahkan meninggal dunia 5.40 pagi. Kesemua yang cedera pula dirawat sebagai pesakit luar di hospital itu.

Dalam kejadian pukul 2.58 pagi itu, dua bas berkenaan yang membawa anggota Umno, dalam perjalanan ke Melaka dan Batu Pahat, Johor setelah menghadiri sambutan ulang tahun Umno ke-66 di Stadium Nasional Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur malam tadi.

Jurucakap polis berkata, siasatan awal mendapati kejadian berlaku apabila bas yang membawa 40 anggota Puteri Umno dari kawasan Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Kuala Berang, Terengganu yang hendak ke Melaka, terlebih dahulu melanggar belakang sebuah treler ketika tiba di tempat kejadian.

Langgar belakang bas

Katanya, sebuah lagi bas yang membawa 44 anggota Umno, sedang dalam perjalanan pulang ke Batu Pahat pula mengekori dari belakang, tetapi gagal

mengelak bas di hadapan itu lalu melanggar bahagian belakang bas berkenaan.

Pegawai Turus Trafik Negeri ASP Abd Halil Hamzah ketika dihubungi berkata semua mangsa dihantar ke Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar, di sini untuk menerima rawatan.

Seorang mangsa, Mohd Hafizan M. Senin, 30, ketika ditemui berkata sewaktu kejadian dia sedang tidur dan terjaga apabila terdengar bunyi dentuman kuat akibat pelanggaran itu.

Dia yang menaiki bas belakang kemudiannya tercampak ke tengah-tengah bas menyebabkannya mengalami kecederaan ringan.

"Saya berada dalam bas di belakang apabila tersedar saya nampak dua buah bas dengan sebuah lori sudah berlanggar dan saya nampak ada cedera, ada yang teruk juga," katanya.

Seorang lagi mangsa, Raja Sulaiman Busu, 59, berkata, ketika kejadian kebanyakan penumpang sedang tidur sebelum dikejutkan dengan kejadian itu.

"Bagaimanapun saya bersyukur kerana saya tidak mengalami kecederaan," katanya.

MB rakam takziah

Turut hadir melawat mangsa di hospital adalah Anggota Parlimen Parit Sulong Datuk Noraini Ahmad.

Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan merakamkan ucapan takziah kepada keluarga mangsa yang maut dan 77 yang cedera dalam kemalangan itu.

"Saya berasa dukacita atas kejadian ini dan mengucapkan takziah kepada mereka dan kita berasa yakin ini tidak akan mematahkan semangat mereka untuk terus berjuang dan bekerja kuat demi mempertahankan martabat maruah bangsa kita," katanya kepada pemberita semasa melawat mereka yang menerima rawatan di hospital itu.

Sementara itu, Noraini berkata, setakat ini semua yang menerima rawatan sebagai pesakit luar sudah dibawa pulang dan hanya tiga lagi masih menerima rawatan.

Katanya, jenazah Allahyarham Roha sedang diuruskan pihak hospital sebelum boleh dibawa pulang dan dikebumikan di kampungnya di Kampung Lubok Tengah, Batu Pahat, Johor.

"Saya juga merakamkan takziah dan kita harap kejadian ini tidak mematahkan semangat mereka untuk terus berjuang demi agama, bangsa dan negara," katanya.

-Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Karpal seeks closure to hudud issue

GEORGE TOWN: The Pakatan Rakyat coalition should make a public stand on hudud and put to rest the never ending debate on the issue.

DAP chairman Karpal Singh said the right person to make this announcement would be the coalition's de-facto leader Anwar Ibrahim.

The two-term Bukit Gelugor MP is confident that Pakatan's official position would be against PAS Islamic agenda as DAP and PKR were not supportive of the Islamic agenda or implementation of hudud law.

"It's time for Pakatan to hold a meeting and clear the air on the issue once and for all. It's time for Pakatan to announce its official stand on the issue," he told newsmen during his routine constituency visit here today.

When asked on whether Anwar should make the official statement, Karpal said "he would be the right person since he is Pakatan de facto leader."

PAS has been pushing for the implementation of the hudud law and this has not gone down well with its coalition partners-DAP and PKR.

Yesterday PAS Ulama Council chief Harun Taib said they would implement hudud if they are the biggest partner if Pakatan comes into power.

Last week PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang said Pakatan, if it comes to  power, would amend the federal constitution to change Islam status as the nation's official religion to Addin (the way of life).

Now Harun has said PAS would even forge pacts with other parties, which support Islamic state, if current Pakatan partners, PKR and DAP, does not back it.

He said PAS would initiate constitutional amendments to enforce its Islamic agenda.

"If we have enough majority, if PAS is stronger than our allies, we will implement… even if not with the current partners we have in Pakatan… may be there will be other pacts that will lend us their support," Harun, the Manir assemblyman, was reported as saying yesterday

Karpal said the statements by both Hadi and Harun were "misleading and mischievous, and can severely damage Pakatan prospects to capture Putrajaya."

He said it would also jeopardise Pakatan chances of winning all the five states – Penang. Kedah, Selangor, Perak and Kelantan – which the coalition won in 2008 general election.

Karpal rebuked Harun and Hadi for making statements that was not sanctioned or endorsed by Pakatan leadership.

"The issue was never discussed at all in Pakatan leadership meetings," he said.

He pointed out that their statements were even against the 'welfare state' stand adopted last year by PAS Muktamar.

PAS Muktamar is the party highest decision making body, which goes beyond presidential power.

"The welfare state agenda adopted by the PAS Muktamar was a reflection of the party delegates and grassroots members stand.

"Harun and Hadi statements are against their own party's aspirations," said d Karpal.

MCA has criticised Lim Kit Siang and his son, Guan Eng, the DAP secretary-general, of being silent on PAS repeated statements on its Islamist agenda.

To this, Karpal said it was DAP's collective stand to oppose any move to change the country from current secular state to an Islamic nation.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Police brutality ‘victims’ stage small demo

KUALA LUMPUR: Some 40 self-professed Bersih 3.0 victims of police brutality staged a small demonstration here calling for the end to police violence and to reform the police force.

"We want people who are against police brutality (at the Bersih 3.0 rally) to stand up and voice their grievances," said the group's spokesperson Gerard Suresh.

This was the first protest held by ordinary citizens against what opposition and Bersih 3.0 leaders called excessive police aggression on a peaceful assembly calling for free and fair elections.

Suresh said the protest started as a one-man-show when he was moved to start a Facebook page calling on citizens to express their discontent with the police handling of the rally.

Police fired dozens of what was said to be United Nations-banned teargas canisters and water cannons to disperse some 80,000 protesters on April 28 which resulted in a violent standoff between them and the authorities.

On the Bersih side, protesters claimed the police assault was uncalled for and unnecessary. They blamed the authorities for the clash that broke out just moments after the police moved in to arrest protesters. Scores were left injured while some were hospitalised including police officers and pressmen.

The Najib administration on the other hand said police acted accordingly and only retaliated after several Bersih protesters breached the barricades leading to Dataran Merdeka which was barred from public entry following a court order against Bersih 3.0.

But media reports and the surfacing of several video evidence of police aggression on the internet have forced the government to admit its fault and prompted the setting up of an independent panel to probe into the violence committed at the rally.

But opposition and Bersih 3.0 leaders have rejected the panel and called it a sham after Putrajaya announced the appointment of former IGP Hanif Omar as the head of the panel.

Suresh said he was not personally a victim of police violence but a teargas canister hit his left leg as he was trying to assist an elderly person to escape the fracas.

He also claimed to witness police aggressively manhandling protesters as they made arrests. The "violence", he added, was what gave him the calling to hold today's protest.

Majority of the protesters gathered in front of the Bar Council office here clad in yellow tees, the colour of the poll reform group, carrying placards saying "end police brutality" and shouted "police reform".

Suresh, who is in his late 20s, said he hoped the protest against police brutality will continue until the force is completely reformed and police aggression ends.

"Now that it is okay to assemble, I hope citizens would use this opportunity to voice their concerns," he said, referring to the newly legislated Peaceful Assembly Act.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Membeli rakyat dengan kemewahan

PETALING JAYA: Umno bukan seperti parti-parti lain. Tidak ada parti lain yang boleh menandingi Umno – parti terbesar berusia 66 tahun itu. Sama ada dari jumlah ahli atau kemewahan, Umno adalah nombor satu.

Kehadiran puluhan ribu ahli Umno ke Stadium Nasional di Bukit Jalil malam tadi kerana menyambut kelahiran parti itu bukan sesuatu yang di luar jangkaan. Nyata sambutan itu mewah dan meriah.

Sambutan yang meriah itu memang sudah sinonim dengan Umno. Sebelum ke Bukit Jalil, ahli-ahlinya bermalam terlebih dahulu di hotel yang di tempah khas di sekitar Kuala Lumpur dan lokasi berdekatan.

Mereka menaiki bas yang disewa khas dan dijanjikan wang saku. Ini tradisi Umno bagi ahlinya yang tinggal di luar ibu kota bagi menghadiri program parti termasuk perhimpunan agung Umno di PWTC. Sesetengah mereka menaiki khas jabatan kerajaan kerana wakil rakyat mereka menjadi Exco kepada jabatan berkenaan.

Beberapa ahli Umno berkata, mereka sangat beruntung menjadi ahli parti itu terutama ketika menghadiri program parti di Kuala Lumpur.

Rosli Awang dari Kuala Terengganu berkata,  "Saya datang ke Kuala Lumpur semuanya percuma."

"Saya tidur di Hotel Grand Seasons dan dijanjikan wang poket tetapi belum dapat lagi. Masa perhimpunan agung Umno pun begini juga."

Jadi anggaran kasar 100, 000 orang mendengar ucapan Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak di Stadium Bukit Jalil bukan luar biasa dan mengejutkan.

Dengan kekayaan yang ada, Umno boleh membawa seberapa ramai yang mereka mahu. Jangan lupa ahli parti itu berjuta orang.

Namun menjelang pilihan raya umum 13 yang kini di depan mata, kemeriahan sambutan  66 tahun itu mungkin untuk seketika sahaja.

Percakapan di cawangan dan bahagian ialah Umno masih tidak dapat bersatu padu sepenuhnya.

Tolak calon parti

"Isu yang paling besar ialah masih tidak semua ahli akan setuju dengan calon yang dipilih parti. Ini yang berlaku dalam setiap kali pilihan raya.

"Umno kalah kerana sikap pemimpin di cawangan dan bahagian berlaku tikam belakang menjelang pilihan raya. Kerana mereka tidak bersatu, kerana ada kepentingan sendiri, ahli akar umbi berpecah belah.

"Umno kalah kerana tidak bersatu. Mereka bermusuhan sesama sendiri," kata Rosli lagi.

Apa yang berlaku itu mungkin satu contoh sahaja. Barangkali perkara serupa timbul juga ditempat lain. Najib mungkin menyedarinya tetapi apa yang boleh dilakukannya?

Beliau cuma boleh merayu tetapi apa yang berlaku sebelum ini tidak semua suara preiden didengari.

Ini yang berlaku kepada Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi ketika menghadapi pilihan raya umum 2008 yang menyebabkan BN kalah empat negeri – Kedah, Pulau Pinang, Selangor dan Perak.

Perbalahan sesama sendiri adalah musuh dalam parti. Adakah ahli Umno memberi sokongan sepenuh hati kepada Najib?

Adakah rakyat boleh menerima sepenuhnya pemerintahan Najib? Untuk menukurnya dari segi program turun padang atau  bantuan kepada rakyat ia bukan jaminan BN secara automatik mendapat undi.

Pengundi sudah bijak. Mereka kini menilai antara kebaikan yang dibuat BN sejak 1957 dengan harapan baru yang diberikan Pakatan Rakyat.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

DAP wants Penang’s free port status restored before GE

GEORGE TOWN: DAP wants Penang's free port status (FPS) restored before the next general election.

Its national chairman Karpal Singh said the restoration of FPS would be a major boost  to the state's socio-economic growth, especially for the tourism sector.

The senior parliamentarian said the removal of Penang FPS in 1969 and giving it to Langkawi was never in the nation's best interests.

"The DAP has always called on for the status to be restored.

"Traditionally Penang has been a free port until the status was removed in 1969," said Karpal, the Bukit Gelugor MP.

State Barisan Nasional chairman Teng Chang Yeow has made the proposal to restore Penang's lost FPS to the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nor Mohamed Yakcop and Tourism Malaysia chairman Dr Victor Wee Eng Lye.

Restoring FPS for Penang is part of a move to improve the tourism attraction and lure  investors to Penang and Langkawi, boosting both islands' positions as world-class tourist destinations.

The FPS is anticipated to attract international hotels and holiday resorts, increase the length of stay of local and foreign tourists and boost tourism .

Historically, Penang was a FPS since the colonial days until the status was revoked.

Despite the setback of losing its free port status, Penang, under the leadership of then chief minister, the late Dr Lim Chong Eu transformed into a major regional industrial base.

Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has said that his administration would welcome any proposal to restore Penang's FPS  for the sake of Penangites.

"Please don't politicise the issue and make it a reality.

"We don't mind which government manages to get this done as long as it's reinstated and this should be done before the general election," he said.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Hudud if Pas wins more seats than allies

KUALA LUMPUR: PAS has made its stand on the hudud issue loud and clear. If they secure more seats than their allies in the Pakatan Rakyat than the hudud law would be implemented.

Its Ulama Council chief Harun Taib told the government-linked English daily New Straits Times  yesterday that the implementation of Hudud was "inevitable" in the event that PAS becomes the leading party in the federal opposition bloc.

"If we have enough majority, if PAS is stronger than our allies, we will implement… even if not with the current partners we have in Pakatan… may be there will be other pacts that will lend us their support," he was quoted as saying.

The hudud issue has always been a contentious issue secular DAP and PAS after DAP national chairman Karpal Singh criticised the Islamic party's president Abdul Hadi Awang for his statement on Hudud.

Hadi had said on Thursday that PAS had never backtracked on their intention to put Hudud to law and that it will seek to implement it if it takes federal power.

Harun said the party is behind Hadi and viewed Karpal's criticism as a "personal opinion as a lawyer", adding that it was PAS's duty to champion the cause of Islam.

Championing Islam

"We are a party that is championing Islam. Of course we will implement what is required by Islam. Pas will always be behind Hadi and the party's struggle to uphold Islam in the government and administration of the country,"  said Harun.

Hudud remains PAS's intention despite the criticism it received from both its allies in Pakatan and rivals Barisan Nasional. The Islamic party had already enacted the law in Kelantan and Terengganu but faced constitutional restraint in its implementation.

The move had threatened to break the coalition just as it did in 1999 under Pakatan's predecessor, the Alternative Front, but intense mediation from PKR, the bloc's moderate lynchpin, had managed to keep them together.

The issue, however, is yet to be fully resolved. Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim said immediately after chairing the pact's presidential council meeting that PAS had agreed that Hudud can only be implemented through a Parliamentary majority.

This means PAS may see its Hudud ambition unlikely to materialise as the party will contest for lesser seats than PKR. It is understood that it will vie for 66 out of the 222 federal seats with most going to PKR.

Rivals said this reflected PAS's inferiority in the pact despite the party representing the country's ethnic majority and highlighted what was said to be a compromise on the Hudud issue. PAS leaders, however, denied they conceded and said they merely "agree to disagree".

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Not many people at Umno carnival

BUKIT JALIL: The second day of Umno's 66th anniversary weekend celebrations seemed a muted affair.

Only a tiny fraction of the 70,000-strong crowd that thronged the Bukit Jalil Stadium last night were present here this afternoon.

Multiple tents and stalls dotted the grounds outside the stadium,but not many people were seen going to them.

None of the politicians that were out in full force last night could be found around today's carnival, which probably saw less than 300 people early afternoon.

According to a programme sheet, today's entry-free carnival was supposed to start at 10am.

Most of the action appeared to centre on the BN Youth Job Fair tent, a paintball arena and and a few outdoor futsal courts.

"It's a Saturday morning. Things are quiet. I'm sure there'll be more people in the afternoon," said an unnamed man after handing out brochures to people here at around 11am.

This did not appear to be the case, even as inflatable castles and makeshift skateboard parks were set up.

In fact, there were so few people attending the carnival that bored personnel handling these attractions amused themselves by playing on them instead.

The carnival will end at 6pm tomorrow.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Pointless Protest

 

http://www.streetdirectory.com.my/stock_images/malaysia/simg_show/my_11817907220736/1/klang_bus_station/ 

Jetset 
 

I visited Petaling Street last Sunday and was amazed to find that more than 1,000 people had gathered to protest against the demolition of Bus Stand Klang, UO Superstore and Plaza Warisan for the construction of the MRT project.

 

From what I witnessed during the protest, one of the main arguments was that they considered the three buildings as heritage buildings. But how is this true? I do not see any point of categorizing these buildings as heritage as they are not even well maintained. In fact, the cleanliness level is horribly poor. I remember, a few years back while I was at Bus Stand Klang, all I could see was exhaust gas-stained walls and litter everywhere. If these buildings are heritage buildings, the authorities, or at least the people using them, should take good care of them. It's strange that these dilapidated relics should suddenly be viewed as "heritage" buildings when it suits certain people's interests.

 

Secondly, I do not understand why the protest will occur when the Government is basically demolishing their own buildings. The act is well within the boundaries of law. This is a democratic society and we can do whatever we want provided that it's within the boundaries of law. Many landowners in the area have revitalized or reconstructed their buildings in some ways throughout the years and no protest was held. Even the three buildings were developed before. It is almost unconceivable when someone considers a supermarket as a heritage building (UO superstore)!  

 

Can we stop the madness once and for all and get going with the project? MRT is needed, let's face it. Everywhere I travelled, I found that a public transport system cannot be stand-alone. It must be an entire eco-system of buses, trains, subways, trams, etc that are fully-linked and service virtually every area of a major city. They have to be well-built and well-maintained. They have to be well thought out so that upgrading works don't happen every few years. MRT is going to do the same for us. Yes, there will be pain for the ones who considered 'UO superstore as heritage building' now. But look at how much public transport helps users and businesses around the public transport hubs. In Hong Kon! g, major MRT stations have shopping malls built next to them or above them. Huge residential developments surround most (if not all) MRT stations. Why? Because commuting is easier, to work, to school, to the mall…less time is spent being stuck in traffic, less money is spent on petrol or taxi fares, and everyone is happier.

 

 

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Why Bersih 3.0 lost direction..?!

 

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--Ay0KhcDDwo/T5uhSVgefsI/AAAAAAAAKmU/b5OBwheHOuA/s1600/Bersih+KL.jpg 
 
With a Huge crowd of over 200 thousand people, this was the initial motto of Bersih 3.0 - Duduk bantah from 2pm to 4pm. But when the Bersih rally was about to start, it was already over. That was like pouring cold water on a bunch of excited people.

James Menon 
 
Bersih 3.0 was a huge success and was overwhelming to so many Malaysian's who stood watching from TV, online, and were on the streets and hoping for success.
 
Here are few things that could have been avoided to stop Bersih 3.0 from Losing Direction compared to previous Bersih rallies.

DUDUK BANTAH.  

With a Huge crowd of over 200 thousand people, this was the initial motto of Bersih 3.0 - Duduk bantah from 2pm to 4pm. But when the Bersih rally was about to start, it was already over. That was like pouring cold water on a bunch of excited people.

Imagine how you would respond if you went for a concert but the performer did not turn up? People were expecting something, a direction or a speech, or something. Not just to come and stand on the street  and go back home because the number is relevant to be declared success. We could have done that by clicking an online Poll and showing the numbers supporting Bersih 3.0.

The purpose of Bersih 3.0 was to show civil disobediance, a hartal. This was supposed to be simple. Just sit from 2pm to 4pm and Duduk Bantah.

The managing committee of Bersih had not been prepared for a proper game plan on this Bersih 3.0.

If complaining that the cordon breach was the cause for poilice to intervene, the cops did not have any reason to attack people brutally during Bersih 2.0. They also attacked people at KL Sentral for Bersih 2.0, canisters of tear gas thrown into the tunnel of  KL Sentral which injured many.

If there was a silent hartal Protest from 2-4 pm the crowd would have cooled down. At least there would be less agitation. And there were people still going to the rally at 3pm.

The people from all over the world got an opportunity to Duduk Bantah. KL should have done it's own Duduk Bantah.

THE COMMIITEE

The Bersih Steering Comittee did not seem to have a proper game plan. In fact the leadership was disunited. Pak Samad ended up at an LRT station for his personal Hartal. Man, this guy was like Gandhi for Malaysia. Why could not the committee just walk with him and bring him to the centrestage of Bersih 3.0? Have we not learnt the 'Kafir' bashing of Ambiga in Bersih 2.0? The committee has a co-chairman in the form of Pak Samad but doesn't seem to know how to utilise him and he takes backstage. Would they dare cook burgers in front of Pak Samad home? It's a personality attack.

Even the rest of the committee seem to be passive compared to lone ranger Wong Chin Huat. This happened in Bersih 2.0 as well. A huge crowd was looking for a leader so they want to see a leader on the crowd in the street. In Bersih 2.0, after Ambiga and Anwar & Hadi were gassed in the tunnel, you can see many Leaders who were created at the spur of the moment. So a headless mob finds its own leader of any person willing to take charge. How can we not have learnt from this?

Sivarasa, Wong Chin Huat and many more became leaders of Bersih 2.0 when the situation needed it to be.  Bersih 3.0 was a 5 times bigger crowd, so more leaders were needed. I am surprised Maria Chin, Arumugam, Hishamuddin Rais and the rest didn't become vocal and take over the leadership and show that the Bersih Steering Committee as single and united. Hishamuddin Rais with his cycnical comments and sarcasm can do better than Anwar but he avoids the limelight.
 
We dont want to see Arumugam write articles and books, but become media savvy and speak up. He owns his own publication and appears at the background of committee photos.

It is time for Leaders to become Legends.

THE HOOLIGANS

In Bersih 2.0 people were moving and t! he same modus operandi was used by the police - let the people in, trap them inside, shut off transport service and whack them inside. This time they became smarter, they even included shutting off communication devices. But have we not seen the same modus operandi from Bersih 1.0 and all rallies after that? Whack the public, spray the water, arrest maximum, charge and threat and haul them to court, demonise the participants. Won't we ever learn? It is the same modus operandi, so there is no point in complaining.

Even if we claim SB officers were in charge and did damage, so what? This cannot be proved because they all are well versed in becoming part of the crowd. So it may seem they had taken advantage but nevertheless its about crowd control. The media will portray what it wants to portray. People had been charged for attempted murder at the Hindraf rally against police. So this is the way it works, don't expect fair play.

Hooligans are everywhere, just that they need the opportunity to show their skills. Giving them bait has succeeded but alas, the Police has learnt for the first time that people do fight back.

PAYBACK TIME

This was the first time Police are beaten in a Rally, both sides seem to be shocked. For far too long, Malaysians have been patient. For far too many Rallies, Malaysians have been beaten and demonised. There were many in the crowd not coming to their first virgin rally but their 2nd, 3rd or 4th .... They would have seen many atrocities by the police in previous rallies. Their blood would have boiled many times over. This time, it was not cowing down but fighting back.

It is one thing about demonising a truly hooligan crowd, but demonising them when they did nothing wrong in previous rallies has proven a point that the Law of Attraction works. Najib & Co has blamed each rally as being a Hooligan Rally but they were no such incidents. Now! they ge t a taste of their own medicine. The more they demonise, they more they will get what they ask for.

LESSONS LEARNT?

Countries like Syria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt & Yemen have gone overboard in handling the people; the people fought back and see what happened.
Equating people as terrorists will only make up a segment of the people to think of terrorism. It might not work if you say it once, but if you keep blaming innocent people and beating them up again and again, one day they are definitely going to think of paying back, not in the ballots but something bigger, mind you.

For a committee like Bersih, if nonviolent civil disobedience is the best way, then they should follow Gandhi's way. But look at what happened to Hindraf who took up Gandhi's Photo and used Peaceful means of rallying. Demonised. Banned. Ostacrised. So will Bersih learn the hard way? 

Even Mahatma Gandhi had to completely stop the Hartal of 1919 because of a death it caused even though the whole country was on the verge of Freedom and people were on the move. Otherwise, Bersih has to move and give in to Forces who are stronger and able to lead the country out of the chaos of 53 years. 53 years is just too long. 

Bersih's Evolution might not be the style for a fascist regime. Revolutions are sparked by simple things and the country may be pushed towards it.

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Why Bersih 3.0 lost direction..?!

 

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--Ay0KhcDDwo/T5uhSVgefsI/AAAAAAAAKmU/b5OBwheHOuA/s1600/Bersih+KL.jpg 
 
With a Huge crowd of over 200 thousand people, this was the initial motto of Bersih 3.0 - Duduk bantah from 2pm to 4pm. But when the Bersih rally was about to start, it was already over. That was like pouring cold water on a bunch of excited people.

James Menon 
 
Bersih 3.0 was a huge success and was overwhelming to so many Malaysian's who stood watching from TV, online, and were on the streets and hoping for success.
 
Here are few things that could have been avoided to stop Bersih 3.0 from Losing Direction compared to previous Bersih rallies.

DUDUK BANTAH.  

With a Huge crowd of over 200 thousand people, this was the initial motto of Bersih 3.0 - Duduk bantah from 2pm to 4pm. But when the Bersih rally was about to start, it was already over. That was like pouring cold water on a bunch of excited people.

Imagine how you would respond if you went for a concert but the performer did not turn up? People were expecting something, a direction or a speech, or something. Not just to come and stand on the street  and go back home because the number is relevant to be declared success. We could have done that by clicking an online Poll and showing the numbers supporting Bersih 3.0.

The purpose of Bersih 3.0 was to show civil disobediance, a hartal. This was supposed to be simple. Just sit from 2pm to 4pm and Duduk Bantah.

The managing committee of Bersih had not been prepared for a proper game plan on this Bersih 3.0.

If complaining that the cordon breach was the cause for poilice to intervene, the cops did not have any reason to attack people brutally during Bersih 2.0. They also attacked people at KL Sentral for Bersih 2.0, canisters of tear gas thrown into the tunnel of  KL Sentral which injured many.

If there was a silent hartal Protest from 2-4 pm the crowd would have cooled down. At least there would be less agitation. And there were people still going to the rally at 3pm.

The people from all over the world got an opportunity to Duduk Bantah. KL should have done it's own Duduk Bantah.

THE COMMIITEE

The Bersih Steering Comittee did not seem to have a proper game plan. In fact the leadership was disunited. Pak Samad ended up at an LRT station for his personal Hartal. Man, this guy was like Gandhi for Malaysia. Why could not the committee just walk with him and bring him to the centrestage of Bersih 3.0? Have we not learnt the 'Kafir' bashing of Ambiga in Bersih 2.0? The committee has a co-chairman in the form of Pak Samad but doesn't seem to know how to utilise him and he takes backstage. Would they dare cook burgers in front of Pak Samad home? It's a personality attack.

Even the rest of the committee seem to be passive compared to lone ranger Wong Chin Huat. This happened in Bersih 2.0 as well. A huge crowd was looking for a leader so they want to see a leader on the crowd in the street. In Bersih 2.0, after Ambiga and Anwar & Hadi were gassed in the tunnel, you can see many Leaders who were created at the spur of the moment. So a headless mob finds its own leader of any person willing to take charge. How can we not have learnt from this?

Sivarasa, Wong Chin Huat and many more became leaders of Bersih 2.0 when the situation needed it to be.  Bersih 3.0 was a 5 times bigger crowd, so more leaders were needed. I am surprised Maria Chin, Arumugam, Hishamuddin Rais and the rest didn't become vocal and take over the leadership and show that the Bersih Steering Committee as single and united. Hishamuddin Rais with his cycnical comments and sarcasm can do better than Anwar but he avoids the limelight.
 
We dont want to see Arumugam write articles and books, but become media savvy and speak up. He owns his own publication and appears at the background of committee photos.

It is time for Leaders to become Legends.

THE HOOLIGANS

In Bersih 2.0 people were moving and t! he same modus operandi was used by the police - let the people in, trap them inside, shut off transport service and whack them inside. This time they became smarter, they even included shutting off communication devices. But have we not seen the same modus operandi from Bersih 1.0 and all rallies after that? Whack the public, spray the water, arrest maximum, charge and threat and haul them to court, demonise the participants. Won't we ever learn? It is the same modus operandi, so there is no point in complaining.

Even if we claim SB officers were in charge and did damage, so what? This cannot be proved because they all are well versed in becoming part of the crowd. So it may seem they had taken advantage but nevertheless its about crowd control. The media will portray what it wants to portray. People had been charged for attempted murder at the Hindraf rally against police. So this is the way it works, don't expect fair play.

Hooligans are everywhere, just that they need the opportunity to show their skills. Giving them bait has succeeded but alas, the Police has learnt for the first time that people do fight back.

PAYBACK TIME

This was the first time Police are beaten in a Rally, both sides seem to be shocked. For far too long, Malaysians have been patient. For far too many Rallies, Malaysians have been beaten and demonised. There were many in the crowd not coming to their first virgin rally but their 2nd, 3rd or 4th .... They would have seen many atrocities by the police in previous rallies. Their blood would have boiled many times over. This time, it was not cowing down but fighting back.

It is one thing about demonising a truly hooligan crowd, but demonising them when they did nothing wrong in previous rallies has proven a point that the Law of Attraction works. Najib & Co has blamed each rally as being a Hooligan Rally but they were no such incidents. Now! they ge t a taste of their own medicine. The more they demonise, they more they will get what they ask for.

LESSONS LEARNT?

Countries like Syria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt & Yemen have gone overboard in handling the people; the people fought back and see what happened.
Equating people as terrorists will only make up a segment of the people to think of terrorism. It might not work if you say it once, but if you keep blaming innocent people and beating them up again and again, one day they are definitely going to think of paying back, not in the ballots but something bigger, mind you.

For a committee like Bersih, if nonviolent civil disobedience is the best way, then they should follow Gandhi's way. But look at what happened to Hindraf who took up Gandhi's Photo and used Peaceful means of rallying. Demonised. Banned. Ostacrised. So will Bersih learn the hard way? 

Even Mahatma Gandhi had to completely stop the Hartal of 1919 because of a death it caused even though the whole country was on the verge of Freedom and people were on the move. Otherwise, Bersih has to move and give in to Forces who are stronger and able to lead the country out of the chaos of 53 years. 53 years is just too long. 

Bersih's Evolution might not be the style for a fascist regime. Revolutions are sparked by simple things and the country may be pushed towards it.

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...