Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Despicable, contemptible behaviour must be condemned

— P. Ramakrishnan
The Malaysian Insider
May 11, 2012

MAY 11 — Aliran is shocked and alarmed by the puerile and infantile behaviour of Perkasa, whose members numbering about 30 held an atrocious "funeral rite" in front of the Penang chief minister's house in Pinhorn Road yesterday.

They also put up a garlanded framed photograph on the gate of the house "to signify his 'death' to the Malay community".

These desperadoes resorted to hooliganism and rowdyism in their conduct by throwing posters of the CM in front of his gate and littering the road by strewing the same posters on the road while on motorcycles on their way to Komtar to continue their demonstration there.

This dastardly act surely cannot be condoned by Islam and other traditions and all right-thinking Malaysians from all walks of life.

What these people did — and had done in the past — is a threat to our communal harmony. They are trying to undermine our unity for their political agenda. They tend to evoke hatred and dissatisfaction among the various communities unnecessarily and without just cause. They are playing with fire without a care and their irresponsible conduct can undo the peace that is prevalent now.

Conducting funeral services and carrying coffins around and presenting faeces as chocolate cake are not the conduct of the brave and the sane. This is the behaviour of the irrational and the irresponsible.

These irresponsible people — believed to be members or supporters of Umno — cannot foolishly think that Umno will not be implicated by their conduct by wearing the garb of Perkasa.

One may wear many caps but the person is the same — he doesn't assume a different personality nor does he shed his form and face by playing a different role.

A nasty person doesn't become a saint by switching his role and associating with another group. He will always be nasty.

What is equally disturbing is the fact that they seem to have free reign to do what they please. Why haven't the police acted against these people?

Is the chief minister's residence guarded by the police? If so, why is it that we did not hear of them taking action? They don't seem to be anywhere near when these people were conducting their 'funeral rites' in front of the CM's residence.

The police, if they are to maintain the peace and order, have a duty to act immediately irrespective of those involved. People are wondering why this is not happening. — aliran.com

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Friday, 11 May 2012, 10:45 pm and is filed under Lim Guan Eng, Police, UMNO. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

The trouble with Islam today


The title of this post is also that of a book written by Ms. Irshad Manji

Photo courtesy of Mkini

that I derived great pleasure in reading a few years back.

Malaysiakini reports today that the launch of the Malay translation of Ms. Manji's latest book, "Allah, Liberty and Love", at a  bookstore in Kuala Lumpur had to be postponed in the face of protests here and overseas.

Malaysiakini quotes PAS youth chief Nasruddin Hassan labeling Ms. Manji as a "homosexuality activist" and her literary works as "views that are against Islam".

"Allowing her presence and meeting with fans means that we are allowing her deviant agenda to spread in this country. This is against the values of religion and culture which form the basis of our society and nation" , Nasruddin is reported to have said.

I have not as yet had the good fortune to read her latest book but just going by her earlier, I shall be earnestly looking to get my hands on a copy of her latest and, yes, I greatly regret this missed opportunity to meet and  share thoughts with this remarkable woman.

I am reproducing below the scanned foreword in her earlier book by Professor Khaleel Mohammed, the imam and professor at San Diego State University.

I have also reproduced below comments in relation to that book reproduced in the same.

If you ask me, the title of her earlier book aptly describes the state of Islam in this country.

You judge for yourself.

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

UMNO/APCO BARU SANGAT BODOH!!!


 
TERBARU LAGI HANGAT !!!! TERNYATA BN/UMNO BODOH !!!
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Bar Council: Ex-IGP unfit to lead panel

KUALA LUMPUR: The Bar Council said former Inspector General of Police Hanif Omar is not suitable to head the independent panel to probe the violence that took place during the Bersih 3.0 rally.

Speaking at a press conference after chairing the Bar Council's extraordinary general meeting (EGM) today, its president Lim Chee Wee said Hanif had disqualified himself by taking a stand against Bersih 3.0 earlier.

"It's unfortunate that the former IGP had referred to some of the protesters as communists," he added.

On April 28, tens of thousands marched in the nation's capital but the rally was marred with reports of police assaulting scores of protesters and journalists.

Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein announced the formation of the six-member panel on Wednesday with Hanif heading the investigation team.

However, Hanif had reportedly told the media earlier that some of the demonstrators were communists as he claimed to recognise their faces.

Meanwhile, Lim said he was disappointed when Hanif had alleged that the rally was aimed at overthrowing the government.

"In my view, panel member Steve Sim (former Sabah and Sarawak chief justice) is more qualified to head the panel," he added.

Lim also expressed doubt if the panel could probe the assaults during the Bersih rally effectively, saying that it lacked the legal framework for this task.

"It doesn't have the power to call witnesses or ask for documents as opposed to a royal commission or a Suhakam inquiry," he pointed out.

Of the 1,270 Bar members who attended today's EGM, 939 voted in favour of today's resolution to oppose the police brutality against the Bersih demonstrators, while 16 voted against.

The rest either left the venue before the event ended or did not take part in the vote.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Set up IPCMC, tender apology

KUALA LUMPUR: The Bar Council renewed its calls for the government to set up the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) in the aftermath of the Bersih 3.0 rally.

The key point is one of the 12 resolutions passed at the Bar Council's extraordinary general meeting (EGM) today.

Out of 1,270 members who attended the EGM, 936 voted in favour of the resolutions, 16 opposed with no abstentions. The rest did not vote on the resolutions.

Speaking at a press conference later, its president Lim Chee Wee said the violence that took place during the rally was clear proof that the government must set up the IPCMC without delay.

"It's obvious that the police cannot police themselves," he added.

On April 28, scores of protesters and journalists were assaulted by the police during the mammoth rally.

Minister, police must apologise

Lim also called upon Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein and Inspector-General of Police Ismail Omar to issue a public apology for the conduct of the police on that day and the indiscriminate use of tear gas and water cannons during the rally.

"The Bersih rally in four other places like Kuantan, Johor, Malacca and Ipoh went on smoothly as the police facilitated and cooperated with the demonstrators. But in Kuala Lumpur, the situation was totally the opposite," he said.

Although Lim admitted that his monitoring team had confirmed reports that some of the protesters had breached a police barricade, he said that did not justify the police's high-handed actions.

"The police should have isolated the area and the specific protesters. Instead, they launched attacks on all demonstrators," he said.

Lim added that the police did not provide enough time frame and space for the crowd to disperse.

"Suhakam recommended that the police should launch tear gas after three warnings at an interval of 10 minutes. But during Bersih, our monitoring team reported that warnings were only given at two minute intervals," he said.

Lim also urged Hishammuddin and Ismail to apologise to all those who were assaulted on that day, including lawyers and journalists.

"The government should offer due compensation to those who were beaten up by the police," he added.

On his next course of action. Lim said he would establish a team of volunteers to assist the victims of police brutality.

"We will provide advise to them on how to seek legal redress but it will be up to them whether they want to pursue the case or otherwise," he added.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Lawyers pour scorn on ‘stupid’ Bar

KUALA LUMPUR: Several lawyers have accused the Bar Council of supposedly siding with both Bersih and the opposition.

They argued that the Bar focused only on police brutality and failed to note the violence caused by protesters during the April 28 Bersih 3.0 rally.

Selangor Bar member Abdul Bakar Sidek attacked the Council, calling it a "political group" of the opposition.

"They come here [and] just want to pass a resolution. They just want to talk about police brutality but they never talk about public brutality towards the police!" he told reporters angrily.

This happened minutes after the Bar Council ended its extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on the Bersih 3.0 rally, where they passed a resolution condemning heavy-handed police action on that day.

Abdul Bakar asked why the resolution omitted instances of protester violence.

"I do not agree with police brutality but at the same time we do have to adhere that the police are also victims of the public and the stupid Bersih.

"…I am ashamed to be a member of the Bar, I wish I had an alternative [to the Bar]. I came just to say, 'Why you need to gather by the roadside like a pariah?'"

"…I wish the government can give us an alternative [to the Bar, because] a lot of my friends do not want to be a member of this stupid Bar!" he shouted.

While he was speaking to reporters, a few lawyers taunted Abdul Bakar, chanting, "Bersih 4!"

In response to this, he said: "You see? Is this a forum of professionals? They want a Bersih 4.0, [but] they are just a bunch of idiots!"

Abdul Bakar later claimed that he had a younger sister, who in her capacity as a policewoman, was attacked by protesters that day.

He also blamed Bersih co-chairperson S Ambiga of shoring up publicity in a bid to "create havoc."

Of the 1,270 Bar members who attended today's EGM, 939 voted in favour of today's resolution, while 16 voted against.

There were zero abstentions, while the rest either left the venue before the event ended or did not take part in the vote.

Failed to be apolitical

Fellow detractor Noordin Yusoff said that some lawyers booed at Abdul Bakar when he presented his views.

"They were angry with him and booing him down for giving his views. Contrary to what the others feel, it's his right [to give these views]," he said.

He added that the Bar Council failed to be apolitical as it did not take protester provocation into account.

"Yes, they are talking about police brutality but they didn't talk about them provoking the police for hours. The Bar Council should be apolitical and not a political party. Don't take sides [with] Ambiga," he said.

Though less vocal than the other two, Kedah lawyer Tan Keng Liang said he was unhappy with the Bar Council's focus today.

He said the Council did not include certain parties affected during the rally, such as traders, taxi drivers and other businesses.

"These are things that the Bar has to consider but was not in the motion, so I was unable to vote for it… I don't agree to [the resolution as] it doesn't show the assault done by Bersih participants on the police [when] in fact I saw footage of reporters attacked by [these participants]," he said.

He added that previous Bar Council EGMs had unanimous voting decisions, a case that was not repeated this time around.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Widow alleges cover-up in gangland murder

KUALA LUMPUR: A widow today accused the police of collusion in a cover-up of her husband's gangland-style killing last year.

B Malarvili, 41, a housewife from Rawang, lodged a report at the Travers police station, claiming that police had not investigated the murder despite her having given them detailed descriptions of the people she suspected were the culprits.

"I believe police know the gangsters who killed my husband were Vasu Devan alias Boxer Devan and his gang—Husin Boy, Katta Babu, Gundu Mani—from Batu Caves," she wrote in her report. "But [they] don't want to arrest and charge them because they are believed to have received bribes from Devan."

The husband, S Murugeso, was 46 when he died.

Malarvili was accompanied to the Travers station by her four children and some relatives and supporters, including Hindraf coordinator MS Mahendran.

"I'm not satisfied because my husband was cruelly killed," she told reporters outside the station. "He was an innocent victim caught in a gang war. Yes, he was not a saint previously, but he had stopped his gangster life when he got out of jail in 2002. He was working a legitimate job as a contractor when he was killed."

She said Murugeso told her a few months before he was killed that Devan would be the one responsible if anything bad were to happen to him.

"He told me Devan had already warned him not to work as a security guard in Batu Caves. Devan even told my husband that he had strong support and cooperation from the police as he gave monthly bribes to the Selayang and Bukit Aman police," she said in her report.

She said she had kept a copy of a threatening SMS that Devan had sent to her husband and some gangsters in Batu Caves.

"My husband also said that Devan had intimidated him and claimed that he had killed Bangsar Shan, Sathiya Seelan Raju, and five other Indian youngsters in Serdang. After that he said he would kill my husband and subsequently his brother, Ricky Bala."

She said Devan bragged to her husband that he gave six superbikes to high-ranking policemen in the Bukit Aman narcotics division after a dinner at the Mines in 2011.

"I have lost my faith in Selayang and Selangor police because five months have passed and my husband's murderer remains free, not arrested and not charged."

Form special team to investigate

Hindraf's Mahendran, speaking to reporters, said police must reopen investigations into Murugeso's murder as well as the killings mentioned in Malarvili's report.

"The Inspector-General of Police must form a special investigation team and charge, within two weeks, the criminals who killed her husband and others mentioned," he said without telling what Hindraf would do if police did not meet the deadline.

According to news reports last year, Murugeso died on Dec 20, gunned down at close range by a five men at the car park of the Laksamana Jaya apartment complex in Kampung Laksamana, Batu Caves.

The gunmen were wearing full-faced crash helmets and Murugeso was sitting in a car. He died on the spot.

One of the bullets hit his sister-in law, who was in the front passenger seat of the car.

The New Straits Times, quoting an unnamed source, said investigations indicated the killing was part of a turf war over drug distribution.

Gombak district police chief ACP Abdul Rahim Abdullah told FMT he had yet to be forwarded the latest report.

"Come to us, if there are new leads," he said. "Now that she has lodged a report with these new allegations that police took bribes, it will be handled by another division, the disciplinary branch, to investigate if there is any evidence to that effect."

He said police would "track down" Malarvili to take additional statements from her.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

A Small But Significant Victory For The Rakyat

PRESS STATEMENT

11 May 2012

 

BERSIH 2.0 welcomes the decision by the Government to totally withdraw the Election Offences (Amendment) Act 2012.  This is a small but significant victory for the rakyat and a triumph of common sense.

 

These amendments should never have been made in the first place.  They do nothing to add to the confidence of the electoral system.  In fact, the amendments reduced transparency and accountability on the part of the Election Commission and brought the electoral reforms back to the original unsatisfactory position. The Election Commission acted in bad faith in relation to these amendments because at no time during the entire length of the work of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Electoral Reform did the Election Commission even hint that such amendments were being proposed.  Instead, they were only disclosed in the dying days of the last session of the Dewan Rakyat.  They were hurriedly passed in a post-midnight sitting when Parliament's clocks were stopped so that the Dewan Rakyat could pretend it was still the previous day.

 

In the aftermath of the withdrawal of the amendments, the country is now witnessing the rantings and ravings of the Deputy Chairperson of the Election Commission.  Like a spoilt child who does not get its way, his public outbursts have demonstrated once again why he is unfit to continue in his job.  Still embroiled in the controversy surrounding his "yes I was no I never was" alleged membership in a major political party, and having reportedly stated to a local daily newspaper that he sees himself as a "kakitangan kerajaan" (employee of Government) when his position as Deputy Chairperson of the Election Commission calls for him to be independent of Government, he has failed to satisfy the rakyat that he is impartial or able to discharge his functions with integrity.   We renew our call for him to resign.

 

We need Election Commissioners we can trust, and who enjoy the confidence of the rakyat.  This was one of the messages sent by more than 250,000 Malaysians both in Malaysia and around the world who came out in support of clean, free and fair elections on 28 April 2012.

 

Much more still needs to be done to ensure that we can enjoy clean, free and fair elections in Malaysia, and the time available to implement our 8 main demands before the next General Election is running short.  Even on issues where the Election Commission has made some progress, efforts are half-hearted and solutions are half-baked.  For example, while rules have been made for the use of indelible ink for voters voting on polling day, there are no rules as to whether advance or postal voters will be similarly marked, and how this will be done.  Given that the abuse of advance or postal votes and multiple voting are major concerns, this issue has not been comprehensively addressed.  Also, the Election Commission is wasting precious time and resources to refute allegations of irregularities in the electoral roll, instead of getting on with the critical work of checking and verifying the main electoral roll.  The Election Commission under the present leadership has lost its mission focus and sense of priorities.

 

We need good Election Commissioners who will propose good laws and practices for the good of the rakyat and the electoral system.  Let's get on with the job.

 

Salam BERSIH!

 

Steering Committee

Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections 2.0 (BERSIH 2.0)

 

The Steering Committee of BERSIH 2.0 comprises:

Dato' Ambiga Sreenevasan (Co-Chairperson), Datuk A. Samad Said (Co-Chairperson), Ahmad Shukri Abdul Razab, Andrew Ambrose, Andrew Khoo, Anne Lasimbang, Arul Prakkash, Arumugam K., Awang Abdillah, Dr Farouk Musa, Hishamuddin Rais, Liau Kok Fah, Maria Chin Abdullah, Matthew Vincent, Niloh Ason, Richard Y W Yeoh, Dr Subramaniam Pillay, Dato' Dr Toh Kin Woon, Dr Wong Chin Huat, Dato' Yeo Yang Poh, Zaid Kamaruddin.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Perkasa wants Lim Guan Eng dead...

NONEPenang PKR chief Mansor Othman today warned that Malay rights pressure group Perkasa has issued a death threat on Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, and urged the police to take immediate action.

Mansor (left) said when the act of protesting at Lim's personal residence included a garlanded framed photograph of him, it meant that Perkasa has issued a threat that says "you are finished, you are dead".

In the rally, Perkasa state Youth chief Risuan Asuddin, who led a group of 30 youths on motorcycles, said Lim was already "dead" to the Malays as he had failed to resolve their plight since he took office in 2008.


Mansor, who is deputy chief minister I, viewed the action gravely because it symbolises death, and should not be taken lightly by the authorities, who until now have yet to respond to the matter.

"It is not that I do not respect the Indian culture (of garlanding a wreath on photographs at funerals) but this is a death threat. Is this what Perkasa wants? How could we allow this political game to go on?" he queried at a press conference today.

"The authorities must take immediate action on the culprits. The police and security personnel were there at the scene, why did they allow this to happen?" he asked.

'Perkasa against a clean Penang'

Mansor also expressed "regret and sadness" that the incident had taken place at Lim's personal residence.

He urged Pe! rkasa pr otesters to bring their plight to the state government offices and not to Lim's home.

NONEMansor castigated the protesters for dirtying the streets by throwing posters of Lim with the words "Guan Eng is anti-Malay" while they were on their journey to Komtar, to hold a second protest.

He describe the act as the group's way of condemning and sabotaging the state's 'Cleaner, Greener Penang' policy.

Meanwhile, state PAS commissioner Salleh Man said  the incident was "shocking but irrelevant" to the current political scenario.

He urged the protesters to stop their antics immediately as they had created a bad impression of the Malay Muslims in Penang.

"Such actions can create hatred among Penangites and Perkasa has actually tarnished their own image. It can lead to racial sentiments and there may be reactions," he said in the same press conference.

"However, it seems that they have run out of capital to find ways to get the attention of the state government to look into their demands," he added.

He expressed strong support for the leadership of Lim, and pledged that PAS would continue to work with the chief minister to administer Penang and resolve the plight of the community.

'State has responded to Perkasa'

It is learnt that Pakatan Rakyat is planning to lodge a police report, and that Lim had spoken to the state police chief Ayub Yaacob about the matter.

The Pakatan leaders were then asked if Perkasa's action was justified as they had previously protested at Komtar but had yet to obtain any response from the state.

NONEState PKR veep Abdul Malik Abul Kassim (right) said the state had responded to the issues like the alleged disappearance of mosque land in Bayan Mutiara and the dangers of solar panel plants in Batu Kawan.

He added that these issues were explained and clarified in various press conferences, flyers, and the state's bi-monthly publication Buletin Mutiara.

He stressed that whenever the group protested at Komtar and later sent a memorandum to the Chief Minister's Office, a representative would always meet with them to receive their documents.


"But we cannot respond to this kind of gutter politics. Should we entertain this kind of rowdy crowd that threatens the CM's life?" asked Abdul Malik, who is also a state executive councillor.

"These are the same people who attacked a peaceful (anti-Lynas) rally at the Esplanade on Feb 26. The person who led the protest was the same man who pointed a shoe at Lim on that day," he added.

"They have organised other rallies before but we allowed them as we believe in freedom of assembly but a death threat, like sending people bullets, is very serious," he stressed.

State PKR deputy chief Law Choo Kiang said that the BN coalition, which is silent on Perkasa's action, should also be asked about their stand in this matter.

He added that the BN component parties such as Umno, Gerakan, MCA and MIC should be challenged as to whether they would still continue their close relationship with Perkasa.

"If the police can issue arrest warrants on Bersih 3.0 protesters, why not these individuals who have time and again created chaos in Penang?" he queried.

"It! also se ems that Perkasa has yet to learn about the multicultural nature of Malaysians. During Chinese New Year, they offered people white pows (cash tokens during funerals) and now this," he added.- malaysiakini

'Funeral rites for Lim akin to death threat'



Guna otak atau dikebumikan, kata PAS pada PERKASA

Dewan Pemuda PAS Pulau Pinang mengecam tindakan PERKASA mengadakan upacara pengebumian simbolik di hadapan rumah Ketua Menteri Lim Guan Eng semalam.

Setiausahanya, Afnan Hamimi Taib Azamudden berkata PERKASA sepatutnya mempertahankan hak-hak Melayu tetapi tindakan ahli-ahlinya itu tidak mencerminkan budaya atau kesopanan masyarakat tersebut.


NONEAfnan berkata tindakan PERKASA itu telah 'dinyalakan api perkauman' yang bertentangan dengan semangat perlembagaan persekutuan dan bercanggah dengan ajaran Islam.
 

Oleh itu, kata beliau, pihaknya ingin menasihatkan ahli PERKASA supaya menggunakan otak dan bertindak secara rasional bagi mencerminkan identiti dan tingkah laku Melayu Muslim yang sebenarnya.

Jika tidak, tambahnya, PERKASA akan dikebumikan oleh rakyat.

Afnan merujuk kepada tindakan kira-kira 30 ahli PERKASA yang muncul di rumah Lim di Jalan Pinhorn dan di pejabat ! kerajaan negeri di Komtar untuk membantah kepimpinan Lim di Pulau Pinang sejak 2008.

Mereka mengadakan "upacara pengebumian" di depan rumah Lim sambil membawa gambarnya berkalung bunga, melambangkan "kematiannya" kepada masyarakat Melayu.- malaysiakini




cheers.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Retired SB officer ‘boost’ to opposition in Mukah

KUCHING: Retired Special Branch police officer Raymond Tambi Subah's decision to join Sarawak DAP is likely to boost the party's campaign in Chief Minister Taib Mahmud's Melanau-centric Mukah and Balingian constituencies.

Subah is himself a Melanau from Dalat and his experience as a intelligence officer will be an asset to DAP's plans to manouevre its way in both areas.

Following its historic victory in the April 2011 state elections, when the party wrested 12 of the 15 seats it contested, DAP said that it will be expanding its reach deeper into Sarawak.

To that end, it immediately moved to set up the Dayak Consultative Council inviting Dayak professionals and grassroots leaders to share their thoughts on Dayak development and help DAP strategise a blue print to take the community forward.

They also pledged to setup a RM1billion fund for Dayak welfare if they came into power.

Since then the party slowly grown in its non-Chinese support.

According to Sarawak DAP secretary Chong Chieng Jen, thus far "30-40% of DAP members are non-Chinese" and the numbers are slowly growing.

He said having Subah, who was formerly attached to the Mukah District Police Headquarters, was a coup.

"Raymond (Subah) being an ex-SB officer knows the 'in and out' of the working of the Special Branch.

"That definitely will help the party's struggle, especially now when the government is using the police force as an additional political tool of the Barisan Nasional, " Chong said.

'Wealth centered at top'

Speaking to the media here today, Subah said as a Melanau, his primary mission now "is to get the ball rolling and to encourage more bumiputeras especially those in the rural areas to join the party.

"We must tell the people that not everything is right with the present government," he said.

Subah said his main concern was the poverty amongst the natives and the uneven wealth distribution in the state and in Malaysia as a whole.

"There has to be fairer distribution of wealth. We want to have a broader base so that more people can join and benefit from the state's wealth and resources. Now the wealth is centred at the top and you know who is at the top.

"My mission now is to let the rural and coastal people know what is really going on in the present government," he said.

Asked why he chose to join DAP, Subah said it was because the party had 'integrity'.

"Some of them (leaders) are prepared to go to jail because of their belief and their struggle," he said.

Meanwhile also joining DAP today is physicist Dr Gerald Lim. Lim, 40, was appointed as a special assistant to the Dudong assemblyman Yap Hoi Liong.

SUPP did nothing

Lim, who spent 23 years studying and working in New Zealand and Canada, is currently a consultant and involved in research work.

He said he joined DAP "not only to attract more professional people to join the party, but to offer professional advice in order to strengthen its base."

A native of Sibu, Lim said he was surprised to see that the town had not changed much since he left 20 years ago.

Expressing disappointment with Sarawak United Peoples Party (SUPP) which 'governed' Sibu for 24 years until May 2010, Lim said: "I left Sibu more than 20 years ago, (now I am back and) Sibu has not changed much in terms of development.

"SUPP has not done much, so what development are they talking about?"

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Time to worry about China? Not quite yet — Clyde Russell

MAY 11 — Just how worried should we be by yet another set of disappointing numbers on the Chinese economy?

The key to answering that question is whether you believe the soft April industrial output, retail sales and trade data is part of a downward trend, or whether it marks the low point, or close to it, for activity.

Industrial output rose 9.3 per cent in April, below the 12 per cent forecast and weakest growth in three years, while retail sales also disappointed, expanding 14.1 per cent versus a forecast of 15.2 per cent.

Coupled with weak trade figures yesterday, month-on-month declines in key commodity imports such as crude oil, iron ore and copper, and you build a picture of Chinese economy that's off the boil.

This is undoubtedly bad news for the world economy, which has been relying on China to make up for weakness in Europe and a still slow recovery in the United States.

It's also bad for those wanting higher commodity prices, and it's perhaps no surprise that the S&P GSCI Index of commodities dipped into negative territory for the year as the China data disappointed the market.

But there is also a risk in becoming too bearish on China, just as there are dangers in viewing the world's second-largest economy through the prism of Western experience.

China is still largely a controlled economy and I suspect that the authorities aren't overly perturbed by the recent softness in the data.

Certainly, there is no sign of a rush to loosen monetary conditions, rather a process of relaxing bit by bit in order to spur certain sectors and help the plan to re-weight the economy to domestic demand from export-led growth.

In fact, if you were looking at China's economic performance in recent months, a good word to describe the slowdown would be orderly.

And that is a huge contrast to what has been seen in Europe and the United States.

The Chinese aimed to slow their economy to lower inflation and prevent a housing bubble.

Both aims appear to be on track with consumer inflation dropping 0.1 per cent in April, taking the annual rate down to 3.4 per cent from 3.6 per cent in March.

Real estate investment rose 18.7 per cent in the first four months of 2012 from a year earlier, down from 23.5 per cent for the first three months of the year.

If in achieving their aims, the Chinese also had the happy side effect of trimming growth rates in raw material imports, any subsequent drop in global prices for commodities would be welcome.

So far, it's hard to argue that the Chinese have been anything other than successful in slowing their economy without having a hard landing.

That they have done so at a time when Western economies would have preferred China to be going all out only shows that Beijing has a domestic focus, and unsurprisingly, doesn't really worry about what Western analysts think it should be doing.

The question is then whether the latest data show the economy is losing steam too fast, and whether, in effect, the authorities have lost control of their soft-landing scenario.

Recent improvements in both the HSBC and the official Purchasing Managers' Index suggest that the worst may be past for China's vast factory sector, but given lags between turns in the PMIs and in industrial output, another month or two of weak results can't be ruled out.

For commodities, particularly iron ore and copper, there may well be months of subdued imports given large stockpiles that need to run down. However, crude imports should gain traction again now that the refinery maintenance season is over and summer demand is looming.

The Chinese authorities also have much more scope to stimulate their economy than their debt-laden counterparts in the developed world, and it wouldn't surprise to see some relaxing of bank reserve requirements in the next few weeks.

The time to worry about China will be if there is further deterioration in data in coming months, with no sign of a turnaround by the third quarter. — Reuters

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

‘Hanif’s independent panel is powerless’

PETALING JAYA: Bersih has rejected the "independent panel'' headed by former IGP Mohammed Hanif Omar to investigate allegations of police violence against Bersih3.0 rally. They say the panel is powerless and lacks regulations that will allow it to serve its purpose.

Bersih 2.0 steering committee said in a statement no indication has been given by the government as to what law will regulate the establishment and functioning of this panel.

"If it is not constituted under any existing law relating to commissions of inquiry, the panel will have no power to summon witnesses, no power to insist that documents and information be produced, and no power to grant immunity to any person giving evidence to it.

"There will be no protection for any of the victims of brutality who come forward to give evidence against a possible suit for defamation by the police in the event their evidence is not accepted and the panel concludes there was no brutality on the part of the police force," said the steering committee .

Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein announced the names of the six-man panel on Wednesday.

Apart from former Inspector General of Police Hanif, the others are former Chief Judge of Borneo Steve Shim, Sinar Harian managing director Hissamuddin Yaacub, Media Chinese International legal adviser Liew Peng Chuan, Petronas corporate affairs senior general manager Medan Abdullah and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia psychology Professor Ruszmi Ismail.

The steering committee also questioned the appointment of Hanif who had previously issued statements that was biased against Bersih rally protesters.

"He has claimed that communist sympathizers who were active demonstrators in the 1970s were involved in the Bersih 3.0 assembly and utilised tactics learnt from past pro-communist demonstrations.

"He has also agreed with Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's allegation that Bersih 3.0 was an attempt to topple the government.

"By so doing he has shown that he is biased and has already pre-judged the outcome of the investigation," said the steering committee.

The committee's third point of contention was that the panellists do not have credentials in the field of human rights and one of them – Medan Abdullah is an employee of a government linked company that compromises his independence.

Instead of forming the independent committee, Bersih 2.0 steering committee has reiterated a call to the government to invite United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Frank La Rue and the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association, Maina Kiai, to carry out their own independent investigations.

It also wants Suhakam to conduct a public inquiry since Suhakam has "the necessary independence, impartiality and integrity to conduct a proper inquiry into the Bersih 3.0 assembly".

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

The So-Called Independent Panel Will Not Be Independent

Press Statement 11. May 2012

 

 

BERSIH 2.0 rejects the establishment of the so-called independent panel formed to investigate incidents of violence which occurred after the BERSIH 3.0 rally on 28 April 2012 ended.  In our view, the panel will neither be effective nor independent.

 

Firstly, this panel is nothing more than a glorified task force.  No indication has been given by the Government as to what law will regulate the establishment and functioning of this panel.  If it is not to be constituted under any existing law relating to commissions of inquiry, the panel will have no power to summon witnesses, no power to insist that documents and information be produced, and no power to grant immunity to any person giving evidence to it.  There will be no protection for any of the victims of brutality who come forward to give evidence against a possible suit for defamation by the police in the event their evidence is not accepted and the panel concludes there was no brutality on the part of the police force.  There is therefore no assurance that it will be able to form a comprehensive understanding of the events that transpired on 28 April 2012 and form a sufficiently objective view of the same.

 

Secondly, the chair of the panel, Tun Hanif Omar, has already made 2 public comments in relation to the BERSIH 3.0 assembly.  He has claimed that communist sympathisers who were active demonstrators in the 1970s were involved in the BERSIH 3.0 assembly and utilised tactics learnt from past pro-communist demonstrations.  He has also agreed with Prime Minister Dato' Seri Najib's allegation that BERSIH 3.0 was an attempted coup d'état against the government.  By so doing he has shown that he is biased and has already pre-judged the outcome of the investigation.  As such, he is unable to approach the investigation with a fair and open mind.  These are very clear grounds for disqualification.

 

Thirdly, we also note that another of the panel members is the corporate affairs senior general manager of Petronas, the national petroleum company, and thus an employee of a government-linked company.  This would compromise his independence.  The other members of the panel are not known for their strong human rights positions, if at all.

 

Rather than proceed with this so-called "independent panel", we reiterate our call to the Malaysian Government to invite and allow the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Frank La Rue and the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association, Maina Kiai, to carry out their own independent investigations and to present their report to the Malaysian people and to the international community.  We also call on SUHAKAM, the Malaysian Human Rights Commission, to hold a public inquiry into the events of 28 April 2012.  These mechanisms have the necessary independence, impartiality and integrity to conduct a proper inquiry into the BERSIH 3.0 assembly.

 

Steering Committee

Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections 2.0 (BERSIH 2.0)

 

The Steering Committee of BERSIH 2.0 comprises:

Dato' Ambiga Sreenevasan (Co-Chairperson), Datuk A. Samad Said (Co-Chairperson), Ahmad Shukri Abdul Razab, Andrew Ambrose, Andrew Khoo, Anne Lasimbang, Arul Prakkash, Arumugam K., Awang Abdillah, Dr Farouk Musa, Hishamuddin Rais, Liau Kok Fah, Maria Chin Abdullah, Matthew Vincent, Niloh Ason, Richard Y W Yeoh, Dr Subramaniam Pillay, Dato' Dr Toh Kin Woon, Dr Wong Chin Huat, Dato' Yeo Yang Poh, Zaid Kamaruddin.

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

AMK: Sebahagian tinjauan UM meragukan

PETALING JAYA: Sayap pemuda PKR meragui sebahagian keputusan tinjauan pusat kajian demokrasi dan pilihan raya UM mengenai trend pengundian dalam PRU 13.

Bagaimanapun, bekas pemimpin pelajar itu menegaskan, peningkatan pengundi atas pagar dalam PRU 13 berlaku setelah kesedaran mereka meningkat.

Timbalan Ketua AMK, Khairul Annuar Ahmad Zainuddin memberitahu, kajian tersebut luar biasa dan sukar dipercayai sepenuhnya.

"Selama ini mereka hanya mendapat maklumat dari BN tetapi kini menilainya dengan fikiran terbuka dari pelbagai sumber.

"Golongan ini cukup mengambil tahu mengenai apa yang berlaku dalam politik negara," kata beliau lagi.

Menurutnya, pengundi atas pagar ini sangat penting kepada kemenangan parti sama ada BN mahupun Pakatan Rakyat.

`Pengundi baru'

Khairul Anuar mengulas laporan oleh penyelidik pusat kajian demokrasi dan pilihan raya UM, Amer Saifude Ghazali yang berkata, kumpulan 30 peratus itu akan menentukan siapa dan parti mana yang akan menang PRU 13.

Menurut Amer, 49 peratus pengundi memilih BN, manakala 21 peratus mahu mengundi Pakatan Rakyat.

Manakala, bekas Presiden Parti KITA Kedah, Zamil Ibrahim berkata, 3o pengundi atas pagar tersebut adalah pengundi baru yang kali pertama mengundi.

"Mereka tidak menjadi ahli mana- mana parti tetapi boleh mempengaruhi kemenangan di tempat-tempat tertentu.

"Sebahagian besar mereka merupakan penduduk di kawasan bandar. Pengundi baru di luar bandar sedikit sahaja," tambah beliau.

Katanya,  walaupun tidak menyebelahi mana-mana parti tetapi mereka memerhatikan dengan dekat isu politik negara.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

UMNO has reduced politics in Malaysia to its lowest depths as illustrated by two disgraceful events yesterday – Perkasa “funeral rite” in front of Lim Guan Eng’s house and invasion of Bersih 2.0 co-chairperson Ambiga’s privacy

UMNO has reduced politics in Malaysia to its lowest depths as illustrated by two disgraceful events yesterday – Perkasa “funeral rite” in front of Lim Guan Eng’s house and invasion of Bersih 2.0 co-chairperson Ambiga’s privacy

Hanif – face reality that you have shot yourself in the foot disqualifying you from heading a credible and impartial probe into Bersih 3.0 violence

Apa amanat Najib malam ini?

Sempena ulang tahun Umno ke 66

PETALING JAYA: Dalam apa keadaan sekalipun Umno tidak pernah kekurangan ahli dan penyokong.  Sudah tentu sambutan ke 66 parti itu di Stadium Nasional Bukit Jalil mulai hari menjadi saksi kekuatan parti itu.

Ribuan ahli akan menunggu amanat Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak malam ini. Sudah tentu ucapan perdana menteri dan presiden Umno akan menjadi azimat bekalan dalam menghadapi pilihan raya umum ke 13 yang kini menunggu detik sahaja.

Sambutan ulang tahun ke 66 ini untuk memberitahu bahawa Umno sebuah parti yang besar dengan keahlian teramai – melebihi tiga juta.

Umno bukan tidak pernah bermasalah. Parti itu pecah dua pada 1987 setelah Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah mencabar Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad bagi jawatan presiden yang kemudiannya berakhir dengan pengharaman parti itu.

Begitupun, dalam pilihan raya umum 1990, BN cuma kalah di Kelantan kepada PAS dan Sabah di tangan Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS).

Parti itu sekali lagi berpecah ekoran pemecatan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim pada 1998. Kes ini memberi kesan yang sangat besar kepada Umno dan BN.

Sedia maklum bahawa jika Umno berpecah, BN akan tempang dan ini terbukti dalam siri pilihan raya umum terdahulu.

Umno menang, bukan individu

Pada pilhan raya umum lalu, Umno menerima kekalahan terbesar dalam sejarahnya apabila melepaskan Selangor, Kedah dan Perak kepada Pakatan Rakyat.

Pulau Pinang yang dipimpin Gerakan juga tumbang manakala Kelantan kekal kepada PAS sejak 1990.

Apa perlunya sambutan ulang tahun ini diadakan secara besar-besaran?

"Sambutan ini penting untuk Najib menyuntik dan meniup semangat kepada ahli dan penyokong menghadapi pilihan raya ke 13.

"Sebagai panglima perang, Najib perlu mengingatkan anak-anak buahnya supaya mengutamakan kepentingan parti dan melupakan matlamat peribadi," kata pensyarah politik, Prof Datuk Mohd Mustafa Ishak.

"Parti (Umno) mesti menang, bukan individu," kata beliau dari Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Mohd Mustafa menambah, ahli Umno juga perlu mempunyai `morale' pada tahap tertinggi kerana pilihan raya 13 merupakan ibu segala pilihan raya.

"Pada tahap ini, Presiden Umno mesti menaikkan moral ahli bagi menebus kekalahan 2008," kata beliau.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

UMNO has reduced politics in Malaysia to its lowest depths as illustrated by two disgraceful ...

 

Perkasa "funeral rite" in front of Lim Guan Eng's house and invasion of Bersih 2.0 co-chairperson Ambiga's privacy

Lim Kit Siang 

UMNO Baru is celebrating its 66th anniversary although it is only 24 years old as it was legally registered in 1988 after the officially-engineered deregistration of the original UMNO and which was why the first and third Prime Ministers, Tunku Abdul Rahman and Tun Hussein Onn refused to be members of UMNO Baru.

Be that as it may, it is indisputable that UMNO today has reduced politics in Malaysia to its lowest depths as illustrated by two disgraceful events yesterday – the Perkasa "funeral rite" in front of Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng's house in Penang and the invasion of Bersih 2.0 co-chairperson Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan's privacy.

In the former case, a group of 30 Perkasa members showed up at about 10.20 am and in a 15-minute demonstration in front of Guan Eng's house in Pinhorn Road, Penang, threw posters of Guan Eng at his front gate and placed a framed photo of him with a garland of flowers to signify his "death" to the Malay community.

What is most deplorable is the total failure of action by the police authorities.

The Perkasa "funeral rite" is nothing less than a "death threat" to Guan Eng.

 

Is it conceivable that if such a "funeral rite" or "death threat" demonstration had been staged by protestors outside the residence of the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak, Deputy Prime Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, Cabinet Ministers or those of UMNO/Barisan Nasional Mentris Besar/Chief Ministers, the police would have been equally passive and indifferent?

What is equally shocking is not only the tacit support for such disgraceful misconduct by the other Barisan Nasional component parties, but there is even a MCA national operative who could openly endorse on the Internet such "funeral rite" or "death threat" protest outside Guan Eng's house!

Would the MCA national operative agree if such "funeral rite" or "death threat" protests are staged by protestors outside the residence of MCA Ministers, Deputy Ministers and leaders?

In the latter case, the petty traders group Ikhlas set up a burgher stall outside Ambiga's house at Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur to protest against loss of income caused by Bersih 3.0 "sit-in"! on Apri l 28.

Both these disgraceful incidents, marking a new low in Malaysian politics, would not have happened under the premiership of the first three Prime Ministers Tunku Abdul Rahman, Tun Razak, Tun Hussein or even under the fourth and fifth Prime Ministers, Tun Mahathir and Tun Abdullah.

Why then are they happening under the premiership of the sixth Prime Minister of Malaysia Datuk Seri Najib Razak?

Is this what Najib meant when he said he want Malaysia to become the "best democracy in the world"?

Is Najib and the UMNO/Barisan Nasional leaders aware of the sense of outrage by decent Malaysians, regardless of race, religion, political affiliation, class, gender or age at the degeneration of Malaysian politics to such depths as illustrated by these two disgraceful episodes against Guan Eng and Ambiga yesterday?

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Undi Pos Di Dun Ladang Yang Meragukan!!!

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_bl7LdIH2sc0/TRzHDPTFU1I/AAAAAAAAAwE/wxLnAg7Uor0/s1600/undi_pos_250.jpg

Ariffin Deraman
Pengarah Jabatan Pilihanraya PAS Terengganu

Kemasukan undi pos di Dun Ladang sangat meragukan. Didalam pilihanraya umum ke 12 yang lalu undi pos di dun Ladang hanya 901 orang sahaja. Semasa pilihanraya umum 2004 hanya terdapat 756 pengundi sahaja. Walaubagaimanapun sekarang ini sehingga suku pertama 2012 terdapat 1575 pengundi pos di Dun Ladang. 1184 pengundi berada di Unit Petiundi Tekukur dan 383 pengundi di Unit Petiundi Batas Baru. 

Terdapat  banyak keraguan pertambahan  undi pos di Dun Ladang. Mengapa terlalu banyak pertambahan undi pos ( 674 pemilih) . Jumlah kemasukan sebenar dari pilihanraya umum lalu sehingga sekarang, seramai 468 pemilih melalui pendaftaran baru dan 517 pemilih melalui pendaftaran pindah alamat, menjadikan jumlah terkini selepas tolak pemilih yang di keluarkan 1575 orang pengundi pos.Jumlah ini termasuk 258 pengundi pos yang didaftarkan bagi suku pertama tahun 2012.

Wow!!! Suatu jumlah yang tinggi. Adakah kemasukan ini secara normal atau secara berperancangan. Ini adalah kerana YB Dato' Tengku Hasan hanya menang dengan majoriti 31 undi sahaja di dalam pilihanraya lalu. Saya yakin ini adalah perancangan terancang oleh pihak BN dengan kerjasama pihak tertentu untuk merampas secara kotor Dun  Ladang dari PAS.

Dari mana datangnya pertambahan pengundi. Dimana penempatan pengundi ini. Tidak nampak pun kuarters baru dibina. Ini sangat meragukan .... Suatu contoh pengundi yang meragukan. Didalam semakan suku pertama 2012 terdapat pengundi pos ditukarkan dari Dun Batu Buruk , Bandar, Wakaf Mempelam ke Dun Ladang.

Contohnya Amri Ibrahim RS11083 , 701 Polis, dari Petiundi Kg Nibung di tukar ke Ipd ktrg, petiundi Tekukur, Dun Ladang. Samsudin Aziz RS 111820,  701 polis Petiundi Pulau Kambing Dun Bandar dipindahkan ke Ipd Kuala Terengganu, Petiundi Tekukur. 

Diharap pihak SPR jangan pandang sebelah mata isu ini. Rakyat juga hendaklah sedar akan penipuan ini. Undi pos sangat meragukan dan merupakan talian hayat BN di Dun Ladang.  Inilah sebab Bersih diadakan.... Bersihkan daftar pengundi dan hapuskan undi pos....

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

MACC springs surprise on Irene

PUTRAJAYA: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC) this morning completed a two-hour long interview with Tenaganita executive director, Irene Fernandez, over her recent remarks of alleged corruption in Malaysia's employment of migrant workers.

But the interview took an unexpected turn when the two MACC officials questioning Fernandez told her that she had to also file a report with the agency and sit through another round of questioning without her lawyer present.

Both Fernandez and her lawyer, Fadiah Nadwa Fikri of Lawyers for Liberty, refused to oblige and further challenged the intention to disallow Fadiah's presence.

"I was very clear of my purpose in meeting the MACC," Fernandez told reporters after the interview.  "The letter it sent on Wednesday clarified that I was required to provide details on my statements and I agreed to the interview on that basis alone."

Fadiah meanwhile was told that if she insisted on being present during the next round of questioning, then the MACC would take her statement to which she refused consent.

"I didn't come with the understanding that I would be lodging a report and I stood my ground," Fernandez said. "The officials checked with "higher authorities" and eventually aborted the plan."

According to Fernandez, the officials had asked whether she agreed that corruption existed in the employment of migrant workers in Malaysia, to which she answered in the affirmative.

She then outlined six such instances which included the 6P programme that has left over 1 million registered migrant workers still in the dark over their status.

Fernandez pointed out that in most cases the employers concerned had colluded with police who either arrested migrant workers who filed police reports or made no arrests during a raid on the employers' premises.

Neutral line of questioning

She also spoke of Rela personnel and enforcement authorities who refused to produce identification when interrogating migrant workers and instead assaulted or robbed them.

"I told the MACC officials that I hoped they use their intelligence units to really look into the issues that I have raised," Fernandez added.

"And I also said that the MACC must critically review its existing system and mechanism that enables corruption and plug the weaknesses. It must be pro-active."

Fernandez pointed out that one area that needed serious attention was the link between human trafficking and corruption, and she urged the MACC to study the indicators of how the latter gives rise to the former.

"They said they will look at the information I have provided them and I really hope they do so otherwise I have just wasted two hours of my time," she quipped.

Fadiah later told FMT that while the officials had attempted to intimidate Fernandez in the beginning, they later pursued a neutral line of questioning and let her off without issuing a summons.

"So far there has been no indication that she will be summoned to give a statement but let's see what happens in the next week," she said.

Fernandez came under fire after she was quoted by The Jakarta Post on Monday as saying that some Malaysian employers have resorted to "paying the police" or "buying court verdicts" to ensure no action is taken against them.

She later said that she had been misquoted by the daily which subsequently agreed to print corrections to its article.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

LET’S GET REAL: Will Najib put in electoral reforms or will he CHEAT?

Some 250,000 people gathered for the Bersih 3.0 rally in several parts of the capital on April 28, 2012 clamouring for urgent electoral reforms to be carried out before the next general election. The event saw protests in over 80 cities around the world. They were all focused and united for a mutual cause.

Rally was not hijacked

The aftereffects of the rally in Kuala Lumpur were quite melancholic. More than 500 protesters were arrested and scores injured, including policemen and journalists. Regrettably, UMNO and its media are exploiting the aftermath of this event by orchestrating and side tracking the real issue of concern to all Malaysians – the desire for a clean electoral process.

"The rally was not hijacked by any political party neither was it derailed by any political leaders," said a medical doctor who took part in the rally.  "The Opposition supported Bersih 3.0 with the same fervour as those Bersih supporters to seek a clean electoral process for the country," she added.

To rally peacefully is a democratic right of every citizen in the country. The rally would not have turned horrid if the police had restrained from provoking the jovial protestors who were there in good faith.

Opposition felt strongly about this issue

Though Bersih is a non-partisan body advocating for a just cause for the people, those affected most in the election will be the Opposition. For this reason, the Opposition felt strongly about this issue as they are the ones contesting in the elections, not Bersih.

Naturally, the Opposition too has a stake in what Bersih is struggling for.  Thus the overt presence of the Opposition during the rally was a blessing for the people who are striving for justice. With the presence of many Opposition supporters it gave more credence to the rally and a lot more political aura for the occasion.

The pro-UMNO media's incessant twists that the rally was hijacked by the Opposition are only meant to divert people's attention from the real issues which are the "eight-plus-three" reasonable demands of Bersih 3.0.

The people turned out in droves as they were aware of the fact that the rally was targeting at those in power who are committing electoral cons, fraudulence and playing muddy politics.

Fear of losing in the next general election

The people who were involved in the rally represented a significant number of Malaysians who have as much of a stake and future in the country as every Malaysian does. They were not fun-seekers or rebels but thoughtful citizens who wanted to determine the fate of the country in a democratic way through fair and free elections.

"Is it the fear of losing in the next general election that makes it so difficult for Najib and UMNO to take heed for electoral reforms?" asked a university student who took part in the rally.  "Is Bersih's demand too much for Najib to chew?"  "Is it because Umno fears tasting defeat in a general election if the electoral process is clean?" he added.

Ostensibly, Najib is dragging his feet on this issue. The people are just demanding for a reform of the country's electoral system and to clean up the electoral rolls before the next general election. Is this too much to ask for from Najib who now wields the central power? Umno seems not to budge and refuses to entertain Bersih's demand for a free and fair election.

Added to that, Najib uses the "Malay race" as his shield to protect UMNO from losing power, that is "if UMNO loses power the Malays will lose power".  But the people are mindful that there is no basis for this fear. The political reality today is that the Malays are represented in both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

Malays will not lose power

It is plain clear that whichever coalition wins the next general election the Malays are well-represented in Malaysian politics. "So why should the Malays worry if Umno fails to make it in the next general election?" asked a young Malay executive who was at the scene of the rally.

The two-party system that the country has is a blessing for the people as both coalitions see the main races in the country well-represented. "The Malays will not lose power but UMNO will," said a PAS lawmaker from Selangor.

Umno has always been in the political comfort zone for almost five decades. Gerrymandering of constituents has favoured UMNO in most rural areas when urban areas dominated by the Chinese saw big number of electorate for parliamentary seats.

And these urban seats had seen stiff contests mainly involving three parties – DAP, MCA and Gerakan. But the rural turf had also been tough for Umno as they had to politically tango with PAS and PKR – the two other Malay dominant parties.

The 13th general election will certainly see a big battle in all constituencies as the two coalitions are well represented by all races. And this is UMNO's greatest fear.

Dominance will not be permanent

UMNO's political dominance was only challenged thrice since the country's independence – in the 1969, 1999 and the 2008 general elections when the Opposition managed to deny the Alliance (1969) and Barisan Nasional (2008) outright power. The 1999 general election saw UMNO floating solely because of the significant Chinese and Indians votes that favoured Barisan Nasional whilst the Malays turned away in droves to support the Opposition.

The Alliance Party consisting of UMNO, MCA and MIC were badly shaken in 1969 by the people's sentiments in the historic general election.

Realising that their dominance will not be permanent in a multi-racial Malaysia UMNO decided to form a coalition named the Barisan Nasional (National Front) in 1973. Umno roped in a number of other political parties, including its adversaries, to form this front.

The Opposition was relatively weakened by this move then, leaving only DAP and PAS as strong contenders in the elections that followed after 1969. UMNO in general have never tasted major defeat in the nation's national elections at the federal level. They had in the process though tasted defeat in Kelantan and Terengganu.

The "mother" of all elections

Another worse scenario for UMNO was in the 2008 general election when they lost power in five states and the Federal Territory (Kuala Lumpur).  Selangor. Penang, Kedah, Perak and Kelantan were won by Pakatan Rakyat and Barisan Nasional only managed to secure 1 out of 11 seats in Kuala Lumpur.

Barisan Nasional was terribly shaken in the 2008 general election when they only managed to garner 49 percent of the popular votes.

The 13th general election will see the "mother" of all elections in the country. The Bersih 3.0 rally on 28 April 2012 demanding free and fair elections that brought more than 250 000 protesters to the streets in Kuala Lumpur is a clear signal that the next general election will be hard for UMNO and Barisan Nasional.

Umno had never thought that their dominance in Malaysian politics would one day be crushed by a strong Opposition. This is now becoming a reality. But this not-so-pleasant news cannot be the excuse for UMNO not to heed for electoral reforms before the next general election.

Najib's averseness to accommodate

Why must UMNO demonise Bersih and the Opposition when it is obvious that the electoral process is not going to be clean for the next general election?  As Najib is adamant and has failed to engage or listen to the people, there is a deep sense of disillusionment and uneasiness among the voters.

This is the voice that will turn against UMNO and Barisan Nasional.

Najib's averseness to accommodate and clean the electoral process will incur the wrath of the people. The urban voters who are generally educated are aware of the significance of having fair and free elections. But a huge number of rural voters are those who are not yet fully aware of the importance this process. This is the swirl UMNO will exploit to the fullest to sink the Opposition and justify why it should not meet all the demands sought by Bersih.

Of course, their modus operandi is well understood by Malaysians. Their shallow slogan to the rural people is "If UMNO loses, Malay power is gone".  But would the majority rural Malays buy UMNO's rhetoric this time around when they see many capable and honest Malays in PAS and PKR who could replace UMNO's dubious leaders?

Crisis of public confidence

UMNO should be cognisant of the fact that the huge turnout at the Bersih 3.0 rally on April 28 attracted both the rural and urban population. This indicates that the people across the nation are aware of the crisis of public confidence in the electoral process.

The basic and democratic demands by Bersih can be met by Najib's government if he has the political will to do so. More's the pity, he has no tenacity to do so for fear of a backlash from those within UMNO who are waiting to topple him.

Public dispiritedness in the electoral process will lead to more anger, dissent and disorder among the people.

"If no changes were made to the existing electoral process as demanded by Bersih and the 13th general election were to proceed, the outcome of the election would be open to challenge," said a political observer. "This will paint the country negative when it claims to have the 'best' democratic system in the world," he added.

There is definitely a crisis of public confidence in the electoral process that drew a huge crowd at the rally. Hypothetically, if to each who participated in the rally there were 20 other supporters who could not make themselves available on that propitious day this could easily come to more than 6 to 7 million Malaysians who are not happy with UMNO and the present government.

The Opposition has good prospects

This huge number, barring other variables, is significant enough to topple Barisan Nasional in the next general election.

It looks like all the "bribes" to the people given by Najib's government that have come to billions of ringgit thus far are not going to be turned into votes for UMNO and Barisan Nasional.  The Opposition has a good prospect of toppling the incumbent government.

"When all is well with Selangor and Penang today, what more if Putrajaya were to fall to the Opposition?" said a former UMNO lawmaker.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Court rulings strengthen native rights on NCR

Recent court rulings favouring natives in NCR land issues should be seen as a warning to potential investors.

The recent court victories of native customary rights (NCR) landowners against oil palm companies should serve as important lessons and precedents to would-be investors.

NCR lawyer See Chee How said oil palm companies can no longer bully landowners simply because the state government refuses to respect the people's rights.

"There is no alternative for big oil palm companies but to cooperate and work directly with the native landowners, and this means you (the companies) have to respect their (landowners) native customary rights over the land.

"They should respect the customary rights of the native landowners, although the government does not respect the people's rights if they want to develop their land," he said.

See, who is also Batu Lintang assemblyman, was commenting on a NCR land case between 168 native landowners and Pelita Holdings, Boustead Pelita Kanowit Sdn Bhd, Land and Survey Department and the State government.

The landowners had sued the companies and the state government after the firms failed to honour its agreement and disburse profits to landowners despite four years of yeild.

After hearing the argument by lawyer Baru Bian, the Sibu High Court ordered the agreement to be cancelled and land to be returned to the landowners.

Damages and compensations are to be assessed later.

Natives not anti-development

Relating to the case, See said that the companies could appeal, but the land will have to be returned to the people.

"We are busy looking for a good plantation company to replace Boustead and help manage the plantation.

"Arising from this case, all the while we have been saying that the investors should respect the native customary rights of the people over the land, even though the state government does not respect native customary rights.

"The natives are not anti-development as labelled by certain quarters. In fact they want development; they want a better life for themselves and for their children and their future generation," See stressed.

He pointed out that knowing this investors should work together with the landowners to develop the land.

"But when investors insist on going together with the government and get the provisional leases and start planting oil palm then you bear the consequences.

"We have won so many cases (nearly 20 cases) and the precedents are all there. And for those who listened to us they are now making money and the natives also benefit.

"It has got to be a win-win situation. But if you do it alone, you may win all or lose all. In the case of Boustead as well as in Gedong and other cases, the companies lose all," he added.

"If they work with the native land owners, there will be a win-win situation. But if they chose to listen to the government, of course you either win or lose that kind of thing," he said.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Perkasa holds ‘funeral rite’ in front of Guan Eng’s house

By Susan Loone and Low Chia Ming | May 10, 2012
Malaysiakini

A group of 30 members from Malay rights pressure group Perkasa held a "funeral rite" in front of Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng's house in Pinhorn Road today, to show their dissatisfaction at the latter's rule in Penang since 2008.

The group led by state Perkasa Youth chief Risuan Asuddin showed up at about 10.20am and threw posters of Lim at his front gate and placed a framed photo of him with a garland of flowers to signify his "death" to the Malay community.

The group stayed around Lim's house for about 15 minutes to express how Lim had neglected the community before convoying to Komtar, the state's administrative centre, where Lim's office is situated.

Along their journey on their motorcycles, the group threw posters of Lim onto the road, before continuing their demonstration for another 15 minutes around Komtar.

Risuan, who had been very vocal against Lim and had participated in most rallies against the CM, said he was considered "dead" to the community as he had never responded to any of their queries.

He denied that the group was acting like Bersih 3.0 protesters in Kuala Lumpur on April 28 as "we are not here to create chaos".

The most recent query by the group had been about the issue of mosque land being "made to disappear" by the state government when it sold Bayan Mutiara to a private developer, Ivory Properties Sdn Bhd.

The group had then also organised a small rally at level three, Komtar, and gave Lim a one-week ultimatum to respond to their query.

Lim, who is also DAP secretary-general, had during a press conference and in his speech at the Penang legislative assembly, denied that any mosque land had been made to disappear by the state government.

He added that the developer will be providing a new plan of the area and would have to comply with the local council's guidelines on land for places of worship.

Meanwhile, Lim expressed deep disappointment and regret that Perkasa had chosen to rally in front of his home.

Lim said they were the same "gangsters" who tried to disrupt an anti-Lynas rally at the Esplanade on Feb 26, where two journalists were injured.

An act of uncivilised people

Lim, who was then at a state executive councillors meeting in Komtar, feared the "disturbances" outside his house would pose a threat to his five-year old son.

He urged the protesters to rally at Komtar if they wished to send him a message, saying they were "used to rallying" at the venue.

Lim however said wishing him death is an "act of uncivilised people".

"Just because we have different views, it does not mean we wish people death. We have to respect their views," he told reporters in Komtar.

"Wishing me dead is a threat to me. I am sure no religion allows this kind of behaviour," he added.

Lim also criticised the protesters for messing up the road with their 4,000 odd posters of him with the label 'Guan Eng anti-Melayu'.

He added that during the recent Bersih 3.0 at the Speakers Square, protesters collected the garbage and kept the field clean, unlike the Perkasa members.

He stressed that the police should know what to do, asking "if this happened at Seri Perdana (the Prime Minister's official residence) would it be allowed?"

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Friday, 11 May 2012, 10:24 am and is filed under Lim Guan Eng, Perkasa. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Bersih chief: It’s an invasion of my privacy

By Nicholas Wong | May 10, 2012
Malaysiakini

Bersih co-chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan today criticised Ikhlas for setting up a burger stall outside her home in protest of traders' loss of income during the April 28 Bersih rally.

Speaking to reporters, she described the incident as an invasion of her privacy and her home, calling it a "terrible precedent" for the country.

"If the authorities accept this then ministers had better be careful, because people will be standing outside their houses next," said Ambiga (left), adding that the she would let the public judge the situation for themselves.

While expressing concern for her family, Ambiga stressed that she was not afraid.

"Look who I have behind me," she said, referring to the leaders of the various Bersih-affiliated NGOs standing behind her.

The leaders, which included Parti Sosialis Malaysia secretary-general S Arutchelvan, Ivy Josiah of the Women's Aid Organisation and Bersih steering committee member Maria Chin Abdullah, were called at the last minute and rushed over in a show of support for Ambiga.

"This is intimidation. I will take the necessary steps.

"This has never happened in Malaysia, except to Lim Guan Eng. Now (he) and I have had our homes violated," she added, referring to a "funeral rite" held by.Malay rights pressure group Perkasa outside the Penang chief minister's home earlier today

Ambiga agreed that the traders had a right to make their claims, but questioned how she was to respond to their demands as she had not been given any information on those claims. "Not even a sheet of paper has been handed to me. So what do I respond to?"

She added the traders were perfectly entitled to file their claims in court, and even sue her if they wished to. "Let the judge decide whether they have a claim."

However, they do not have the right to come to my home and behave in such a manner, she stressed.

She said she would file a police report immediately: "I have a duty to lodge a police report… this is about the whole neighbourhood, and my family."

The police were present in a patrol car during the incident, but did not act against any of the Ikhlas members.

Stunned at ex-IGP leading probe panel

Meanwhile, she repeated her opposition to the appointment of former inspector-general of police Hanif Omar as the head of the independent panel to probe incidents of violence during the Bersih 3.0.

She stressed his remarks alleging pro-communist elements in the rally recently made him unsuitable for the position.

"(Hanif) has learnt law, so he should know that (his remarks) immediately disqualify him."

She also lamented the lack of human rights experts or assemblies on the panel, adding that they would have to reconsider Bersih's involvement in the panel's investigation given their lack of confidence in it.

Maria Chin Abdullah added that it was not too late to set up a different panel, if the government was sincere in resolving the issue of police violence during the rally.

However, Bersih insists the government accept UN rapporteur Frank William La Rue's invitation to assist the panel as well as appoint Suhakam to head the panel.

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Friday, 11 May 2012, 10:33 am and is filed under Bersih. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...