Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

DBKL tutup Dataran Merdeka selama 48 jam...

NONEDewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) akan menutup selama 48 jam Dataran Merdeka - yang mahu digunakan oleh BERSIH untuk mengadakan perhimpunan bantah duduk Sabtu ini - berkuatkuasa jam 6 pagi esok.

Arahan tersebut dikeluarkan oleh Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur, Tan Sri Ahmad Fuad Ismail  dalam satu kenyataan petang ini.
Berikutan itu  Dataran Merdeka akan ditutup kepada orang awam, mulai jam 6 pagi Jumaat sehingga 6 pagi Ahad ini.

Menurutnya, Dataran Merdeka akan ditutup sementara kepada orang awam dalam tempoh tersebut mengikut Seksyen 65 Akta Kerajaan Tempatan 1976.

Semalam Ahmad Fuad memberi amaran kepada Gabungan Pilihan Raya Bersih dan Adil (BERSIH) dan penyokongnya bahawa tindakan keras akan diambil jika mereka meneruskan hasrat untuk berhimpun di Dataran Merdeka pada 28 April ini.



DBKL locks down Dataran for 48 hours...

Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) will enforce a 48 hour lock down on Dataran Merdeka from 6am tomorrow morning.

In a statement date this evening, Kuala Lumpur mayor Ahmad Fuad Ismail said restriction will be enforced based on Local Government (Dataran Merdeka) (Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur) By-Laws 1992 and Section 65 of the Local Government Act 1976.

Ahmad Fuad (right) said the! restric tion will be lifted at 6am on Sunday morning.

The short one-paragraph statement was issued late this evening.

This comes just 24 hours after a meeting between Ahmad Fuad and Bersih 2.0's steering committee broke down.

Yesterday, Ahmad Fuad had urged Bersih to move its Bersih 3.0 rally  away from Dataran Merdeka, citing security concerns and public order.

However, Bersih is adamant on holding the rally at Dataran Merdeka because it was too late to change venues as many of its supporters may not receive the instruction in time. 

NONEBersih co-chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan said that there will be a bigger problem for the authorities if the group had to turn away people from Dataran Merdeka and re-direct them to Stadium Merdeka, which is about a kilometre away.

When informed about the matter, the student groups that are currently occupying Dataran Merdeka said they will not budge unless threatened.


Another group, Occupy Dataran, which has joined the student's sit-in - now in its 13th day - said they will convene a meeting a midnight before deciding on their next move.


 source:malaysiakini
 

 Jangan lupa ya!!!


azlan
 cheers.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Ambiga: Our youth have awakened

PETALING JAYA: The Malaysian youth have awakened and are now bolder in demanding their rights compared to their peers in the past, Bersih 3.0 co-chairperson S Ambiga said.

She said this today during a live interview on FMT RAW by journalist Stephanie Sta Maria in response to a question from a reader.

She was asked if Bersih 3.0 was in any way linked to the two youth movements, namely the students protesting against National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN) loan scheme and the activists who called themselves "Occupy Dataran".

The two groups have been camping at the historical site for the past two weeks.

"We're not [linked to them], but I support what they're doing. This is an exuberance of

youth at its best," said Ambiga, referring to the determination of the two groups to stay on at Dataran Merdeka despite repeated attempts by the authorities – as well as thugs – to break them.

"My generation – I'm 55 now – has failed the next generation. We didn't fight hard enough, during our time, when abuses were taking place and when we were losing our rights."

"The youth now are not waiting, they are fighting for themselves. It is a wonderful phenomenon. I fully support them," she said.

Ambiga said that "the years of repression in our educational system" could still produce students like this who are prepared to stand up for their rights.

On another matter, she denied a rumour that Bersih 3.0 has been paying people to come for the rally.

"The facts speak for themselves; why do we need to do that when we are selling T-shirts? Let me assure you, we don't need to pay anyone to turn up. We don't have the money to do that anyway."

'Come with courage'

Ambiga noted that the Bersih 3.0 T-shirts have been selling like hot cakes, but was coy when asked if Bersih 3.0 could really achieve its 500,000 target.

"We never know. We said it's 500,000 worldwide. Our T-shirts are going out at 1,000 a day, and there are others selling them too," she said.

Ambiga said that there are now 70 countries worldwide supporting Bersih 3.0 compared to 32 last year, adding that there is a big jump in the number of supporters this time.

"Come in the spirit of Bersih and you won't be disappointed. Come with courage, don't worry, and don't miss out."

Click here to view the video on YouTube.

Asked by a reader if the public should boycott the coming general election in a worst-case scenario, Ambiga firmly said: "No"

"I don't believe in boycotting elections. No matter what happens.

"In fact, we should be coming out in bigger numbers to vote… we want to push for 100% voter turnout because this will mitigate some of the faults in the system. Boycott is not an option."

Asked about the possibility of Bersih 4.0, Ambiga said the electoral reform group would want to see the government's responses first.

"What we sincerely want is this: Please, delay the 13th general election until full reforms take place. If we work very hard from now on, putting in some safeguards, we should be able to do that by the end of this year."

On whether she has considered contesting as a candidate in the coming general election, Ambiga said: "I've been asked 50 times, the answer is no. So now the 51th time, it's still the same."

Why not? "I've never been interested in politics and I will not change my mind on that."

Also read:

The mayor's Bersih 3.0 headache

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Time for change

Letters
by Ong

Dear Mr. Lim,

I'm a 29-year old Penangite, and I've been in the U.S. for over 10 years. I did not get a JPA scholarship or any government scholarships, but I was offered almost a free ride to five top-tier schools in the U.S. (Wellesley, Mount Holyoke, Middlebury, Wesleyan (Freeman Asian Scholarship), and Dartmouth). I chose Wellesley where I received an amazing education (I met Nat Tan who was then at Harvard), and then worked in economic consulting in Boston for a few years, before starting a Ph.D. in Economics at Brown University.

My father was a businessman (and not a rich taukeh, mind you) and my mother, a primary school teacher. Growing up, money was always tight. Yet they managed to send four out of five daughters on to pursue their Bachelor's and Master's degrees in top 50 universities in the U.S. How did we do it? It was neither through government scholarships, nor through Father-Mother Scholarships, but through the generous financial aid of U.S. institutions and the contributions of relatives. Not surprisingly, of the four, one is in London, and three are in the U.S.

As a teenager in the 1990s, my only news outlet was mainstream newspapers, e.g., The Star, which as you well know, was effectively taken over in the 1980′s by the government. I recall being irked by the low quality of the newspaper — I would deem the standard of writing equivalent to that of a Standard Six student. Coverage of local events, such as the planting of a tree, would revolve around xyz politician saying so and so. More annoying was that on day one, you would have Mahathir saying blah blah blah. On day two, you'll have several politicians parroting Mahathir's views, saying "Mahathir said blah blah blah so blah blah blah." And so on and so forth for the next few days. Did these so-called leaders have no thoughts or ideas of their own? It would seem that they, sememangnya, are incapable of such. Sadly enough, the quality of the media has hardly improved, but that is another story for another day.

Only after leaving Malaysia did I slowly realize how oppressed and repressed we had been (and still are). Part of it may have been a natural maturation process that comes with age. A bigger part, I think, comes from being taken entirely out of the country, and placed in a new context where I was exposed to people from different countries, with different experiences and different ideas. Perhaps more importantly, I realized that I used to identify as a Chinese in Malaysia, but now that I was out of Malaysia, my identity evolved to that of a Malaysian … period.

The results of the March 2008 elections were unexpected, to say the least. Who would have thought it was possible? I have to admit that that was the first time I ever thought that one day, maybe one day I can go back to my country. Before then, it was not even a consideration … why return to a country where I'll be treated as a second-class citizen?

Since 2008, the political sandiwara, parasitical leeching, and blatant thievery have continued, and in fact, intensified. At the same time, there is an awakening of the rakyat. The mantle of fear and oppression is being cast off. And we now have hope for the future.

I just wanted to thank you for fighting for our country, for speaking up when few would do so, for being a staunch opposition-er for decades. How much easier would it have been to fold in with the ruling party, to accept the accolades and bodek-ing and titles and easy money. I thank God for people like you who are willing to stand up to make a difference. And now you've paved the way for many, many people, young and old, to do the same.

I will be at the Bersih rally in Boston on Saturday. Those of us outside Malaysia have it easy. We just have to show up and sembang with fellow Malaysians. I pray for those of you in Malaysia, for God's protection over all of you. I'm praying for our country, and for the new generation of leaders that God will rise up. God bless you.

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Thursday, 26 April 2012, 2:47 pm and is filed under Bersih, Elections, Letters, Mahathir, Media. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Use of thugs, gangsters, hooligans a very dangerous trend

— Tota
The Malaysian Insider
Apr 26, 2012

APRIL 26 — Umno Baru has a lengthy catalogue of lawless behaviour. It appears that the rule of law is a stranger to Umno Baru. When Justice Harun declared Umno illegal, the party died.

The new party is registered as Umno Baru; yet the party continues to call itself Umno! The party logo was supposed to be a new one; yet the old logo with some imperceptible cosmetic change continues to be used. The keris on its logo has given rise to detractors calling it a party of pirates! The keris has come in useful for Umno leaders to threaten the non-Malays. Umno leaders have brandished the keris and used implicit threats.

Concerned individuals and groups have alleged that Umno Baru has let loose its mobs and thugs all too frequently to disrupt, sometimes violently, legitimately organised meetings and forums by civil society groups and NGOs. The Apcet 11 forum at a hotel in KL was disrupted by an Umno Baru mob that threatened the participants and smashed tables and chairs to stop the proceedings. When the Suqiu organisation submitted its 17-point plan for the betterment of the country, an Umno Baru mob threatened them with "rivers of blood" outside the Chinese Assembly Hall, KL, if they did not withdraw their 17-point plan.

Umno Baru used similar tactics to stop the Article 11 Group from holding meetings and the Bar Council forum on the conversion of minors to Islam when one spouse in a non-Muslim marriage converts to Islam. Police inaction emboldened the Umno thugs even to prevent Karpal from entering Parliament House. An Umno Baru mob led by a screaming hooligan, Khairy, outside the US Embassy advertised to the whole world that Umno Baru is a party trapped in the Stone Age.

The rule of law is obviously not part of Umno Baru culture. While proclaiming to the whole world that "demonstrasi luar kebudayaan kita", Umno Baru and its allies have, since March 8, 2008, organised numerous illegal demonstrations in Pakatan-ruled states. Criminal intimidation is part and parcel of Umno Baru's political strategy.

What kind of mentality, culture and religion must a person have to send a coffin or an excreta-shaped cake to Lim Guan Eng, Chief Minister of Penang? On every occasion these thugs have got away scot-free without any action by the police who appear to be conniving and colluding with the thugs.

Perhaps the worst case of Umno Baru lawlessness is the power grab of the Perak state government. The behaviour of the BN assembly members when the Pakatan Rakyat Speaker was forcibly removed was disgraceful. BN's action was unethical, immoral and defeated the will of the people who had voted for a Pakatan Rakyat government to rule them.

Now a new phenomenon has lifted its ugly head in the political arena — the use of thugs, gangsters and hooligans to intimidate and frighten, sometimes violently, civil society and NGOs carrying out their legitimate activities. Dissenters, protesters and even opposition leaders have become victims of these thugs.

The PSM EO6 support group was threatened by thugs when they gathered outside the Kepala Batas police station. The police refused to give them protection and it was PAS that came to their rescue.

Students holding a meeting in Klang on a Saturday night were attacked by 20 thugs, according to student activist Ehsan Bukharee. The police only told the students to cancel their meeting. The ABU (Anything But Umno) movement meeting at the Shah Alam City Council hall was attacked by a mob on Monday, January 24, 2012.

Recently, people who participated in the Himpunan Hijau programmes all over Malaysia were attacked by thugs. Anwar's car was attacked in Johor. Nurul Izzah's car was attacked in Pahang.

At the Penang Esplanade, Lim Guan Eng and his car came under attack, allegedly by Perkasa thugs. It was alleged the police stood by and watched the violence without taking action.

The recent attack on students camping at Dataran Merdeka is indeed shocking. Fifty thugs dressed in black beat up the students in the dead of night. Their struggle for free education is a legitimate one: 19 countries in the world provide free education. Why can't Malaysia?

One does not have to be a rocket scientist to know who or which party is unleashing these mindless thugs to bark or bite at the bidding of their masters. If there is a poverty of brainpower in a political party from top to bottom, they will refuse to engage in the battle of the mind with anyone. Such a political party is indeed pitiable. Because it lacks brainpower, the only weapon in its arsenal is brawn power.

I hope and pray that the Bersih 3.0 Duduk Bantah at Dataran Merdeka does not provide a golden opportunity for thugs, gangsters and hooligans to do their worst. — aliran.com

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Thursday, 26 April 2012, 4:48 pm and is filed under Bersih, Human Rights, Police, UMNO. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Najib should honour his declaration that “the era of government knows best is over” and heed the voice of Malaysians at home and in 72 cities/29 countries who want real and not cosmetic change in national governance

Citizens’ and Bersih 3.0’s freedom to assemble

— Proham
The Malaysian Insider
Apr 26, 2012

APRIL 26 — Proham recognises that freedom of assembly is a fundamental human right. Public discussions, debates, peaceful demonstrations and "sit-ins" are a form of public expression within the democratic tradition and should be viewed as normal. Proham recognises that these provisions are part of the newly enacted Peaceful Assembly Act 2011.

In this context Proham feels that the authorities including Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) and the police should facilitate Bersih and its followers the exercise of this right as citizens of Malaysia in a place of their choice. The home minister has already indicated that this movement is not viewed as a security threat.

Proham feels that the authorities could view this citizens' movement as part of the people's call for "free and fair elections" in Malaysia. In addition, if both authorities and Bersih leaders work together there will be no disruption in the city as many larger events have been hosted in the city centre before.

A positive commercial value can be gained when viewed as a carnival. This will not hamper business but enhance taxi and transportation services including hawking and restaurants. The approach authorities take will provide the right environment for citizens making a claim in public for democracy and good governance.

It is in this context that Proham feels that the police and other enforcement officials should exercise understanding, empathy and tremendous restraint and enable citizens' action in a peaceful and open way. We are confident that in light of many democratic changes adopted by the federal government that the democratic space will be enhanced for citizens' participation.

Since this is the first public demonstration after the adoption of the Peaceful Assembly Act, it is a great opportunity for government to show its commitment to human rights, freedoms and moderation.

We hope the government and the people will both come out well in this test case, which will set the precedent for the implementation of the new Peaceful Assembly Act.

* Proham is the group of former human rights commissioners of Malaysia. This statement is endorsed by Tan Sri Simon Sipaun (Proham chairman), Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam (Proham member), Datuk Michael Yeoh (Proham secretary) and Datuk Dr Denison Jayasooria (Proham exco).

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Thursday, 26 April 2012, 5:21 pm and is filed under Bersih, Elections, Human Rights. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

RFS ‘poisoning mentality’ of rural Dayaks

Barisan Nasional leaders in rural Sarawak want the government to clamp down on Radio Free Sarawak broadcast.

Barisan Nasional grassroots leaders, increasingly disconcerted by the reach of Radio Free Sarawak (RFS) in the interior of Sarawak, are claiming that the news aired by the Internet broadcasting network is "poisoning" the "mentality" of the native Dayaks.

"The radio is rubbish and it may destroy the mentality of the Ibans and the Dayak community as a whole," said a local pro-government leader pemanca (chief), Wilson Siang Lim.

He said before RFS does more damage, the government must clamp down on the widely popular broadcasts.

"Before RFS spreads more ill-will, the government must take action," he said.

RFS broadcasts daily from London from 6pm to 8pm on SW 15420 KHz to Sarawak, especially the rural areas.

Since its first launch in 2010, RFS has gone on to become a "leader" in alternative radio-news broadcast with call-ins from locals highlighting BN's lies, broken promises, rampant corruption, and abuse of power.

Locals have also called in to register their protests against the government's contentious hydro-electric dam projects and land grabs by the state government, ignoring their native customary rights (NCR) status.

Lambir assemblyman Ripin Lamat has called on the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to restrict the frequency of RFS.

Lamat, who apparently has been listening to RFS, said the news clips were discrediting the government.

'Refute RFS stories'

He said the radio channel broadcasted in the Iban language was introduced by the opposition party to condemn the government ahead of the 13th general election.

"We urge related agencies to take immediate action to stop RFS from spreading lies by restricting its radio frequency," Lamat said recently.

He said the opposition was using RFS to fish for votes.

"RFS was spreading false information with elements of sedition and defamation to rural voters. This is part of their strategy to fish for votes," he said .

He urged inhabitants in longhouses in Sarawak to bar opposition members who promote the radio channel.

But unknown to Lamat, RFS is where the rural people phone in their complaints and pour out their grievances.

Chastising Lamat for his "advice" to natives, Sarawak PKR chief Baru Bian said: "This is indeed a very destructive and uncalled-for advice.

"Firstly, it is an affront to the longhouse culture of welcoming any person notwithstanding backgrounds, race, religion and political affiliation.

"Secondly, such statement is going to cause ill-feelings among residents of longhouses, which should not be the case as anybody is free to give support to any political party.

"Supporting political ideologies is legal in Malaysia.

"Thirdly, if RFS is not telling the truth, refute it. BN has all the means to refute any purported lies, but don't plant seeds of discord by destroying our culture.

"Perhaps, the truth hurts," said Bian, who is the Ba'Kelalan assemblyman.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Malaysia should welcome independent electoral observers

— Damien Kingsbury
The Malaysian Insider
Apr 26, 2012

APRIL 26 — Malaysia is facing a political crisis. Its government appears to have lost electoral legitimacy and is facing its biggest challenge to holding onto power since independence half a century ago.

As with the flowering of democratic movements in other countries over the past year, Malaysia now appears to be approaching its own "democratic spring".

In order to forestall this blossoming of democracy in Malaysia, the government has hobbled the Election Commission, has rorted the electoral process through disproportionate parliamentary seats and a range of other matters that continue to require investigation.

The government now appears ready to stage elections at a time it believes will produce the best results for itself.

It is the responsibility of the government, as custodian of the state, to serve its citizens — this is the sole reason for being of the state and the role of government in it. In order to do this, the people who run the state must be selected by the citizens to represent them, in a transparent and accountable manner.

This, in turn, implies the necessity of free and fair elections.

If the government of Malaysia believes that its electoral process will be free and fair, according to international standards, we would welcome being invited to come to Malaysia as independent electoral observers. If the Malaysian government does not invite independent international observers, the question will be left: what do they have to hide?

We hope they do not feel the need to hide anything. We welcome the opportunity to observe and monitor Malaysia's next elections, whenever they might be held. We will be there, supporting democracy in Malaysia, as expressed through a free and fair expression of the will of the Malaysian people. — www.globalbersih.org

* Professor Damien Kingsbury is director, Centre for Citizenship, Development and Human Rights at Deakin University, Melbourne, and is co-ordinator of the Australian Friendship observer mission to the East Timor elections, as well as having been an accredited observer to elections in Indonesia and Cambodia.

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Thursday, 26 April 2012, 7:49 pm and is filed under Bersih, Elections. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Sharing my thoughts on MobTV


Click the MobTV logo to catch my chat with host Jahaberdeen.

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Peneroka ‘diperdaya’ tandatangani pinjaman bank

KUALA LUMPUR: Persatuan Peneroka Anak Felda Kebangsaan (Anak) mendakwa peneroka seperti diperdaya apabila menandatangani surat pinjaman pembelian saham Felda Global Ventures Holdings Berhad (FGVH).

Surat perjanjian bank setebal 60 muka surat itu ditulis dalam Bahasa Inggeris, mengandungi syarat-syarat yang memaksa peneroka menanggung semua risiko sendiri jika saham itu rugi.

Presiden Anak Mazlan Aliman berkata, borang pembiayaan pinjaman saham FGVH telah pun diedarkan oleh bank-bank komersial kepada peneroka.

Bank-bank komersial memberikan kebebasan kepada peneroka untuk menyatakan jumlah pinjaman yang mereka mahu.

Ini kerana menurut Mazlan, bank memberikan kelonggaran sedemikian kerana mendapat jaminan kerajaan dan peneroka mempunyai aset tanah 10 ekar.

Namun dalam masa sama jika rugi, peneroka perlu menanggung semua risiko dan pembayaran semula pinjaman.

"Malangnya hampir 90 peratus peneroka sudah pun menandatangani borang (pinjaman bank) itu.

"FGVH memperalat pengurusan Felda memaksa peneroka mengisi borang tersebut dalan keadaan mereka keliru dan sebahagian besar tidak tahu apa-apa," katanya kepada pemberita di pejabat Suruhanjaya Koperasi Malaysia (SKM) di sini hari ini.

Katanya, situasi ini menyedihkan apabila peneroka diperdaya dengan 'durian runtuh' untuk menghalalkan tindakan kerajaan bagi tujuan penyenaraian ke Bursa Malaysia.

"Pasaran saham dimanipulasi oleh pihak spekulator dan tidak menentu. Ini mampu memudaratkan kepentingan aset peneroka," katanya.

Himpunan ala Bersih


Oleh itu, beliau berkata Anak tidak akan teragak-agak untuk mengadakan perhimpunan besar-besaran seperti Perhimpunan Bersih jika Felda terus mengganggu hak peneroka.

Katanya, perhimpunan itu adalah langkah terakhir memandangkan pelbagai usaha telah dibuat termasuk membuat laporan polis, injunksi mahkamah, dan sebagainya.

"Kita akan buat himpunan terbesar demi mempertahankan saham peneroka. Ini saja pilihan yang ada," katanya.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

The Bangsar Bubble

In our Selected Exhortations category, we republish interesting stuff such as must-read articles and essays not originally written exclusively for the blawg, and which have come to our attention. Please feel free to email loyarburokker@loyarburok.com if you would like to reproduce your writing, but first follow our Writer's Guide here.

This article was first published in The Malaysian Insider.

Corporates do it. Socialites want to be part of it too. Anyone who wants to have his 15 minutes of fame, or brush with stardom, jump on the bandwagon. Activism, in Kuala Lumpur, has become sexy.

Who doesn't know of LoyarBurok and Haris Ibrahim? The megawatt auras of elite activists and public intellectuals such as Malik Imtiaz Sawar, Art Harun, pack rooms when public discourses are organised. Uber feminists such as Marina Mahathir, Ivy Josiah and political heroines like Nurul Izzah and Hannah Yeoh have ramped up the political scene even more.

And just like the media in Malaysia, activism seems to be centred on upper middle class Bangsar. Malaysia Day is celebrated at low-key but upscale restaurants of Jalan Bangkung. LoyarBurok's office is at Bangsar Utama, and hardened activists and writers meet at the mamaks' outlets surrounding the area, as organisations such as NIEI, Malaysiakini, and yes, this very news website, are based here. Across the road is the old guard, New Straits Times. And a hop, skip, over to the other side of the city, is The Star and the Redberry group of companies. Meetings, deals, insider gossip and leads tend to converge around Bangsar as it is convenient.

Would it be (un)fair then to say that activism in Malaysia tends to be middle-class, and that the players, while they have bleeding hearts, have no clue as to what the issues are?

It is Not about Bangsar

It would be harsh to single out Bangsar as the epicentre of activism social activities. It just happens to be that, simply because of the convenience, and that is the cold hard truth.

Really?

Edward Soo, lawyer and owner of Leonardo's is behind MalaysiaKu, an annual whole day festival celebrating Malaysia Day, situated at the tony Jalan Bangkung, Bangsar. The fleet of restaurants host talks, events and the street is transformed into a luxe-boho carnival. In an email interview, Soo offers very candid views on activism in Malaysia. For one, he disagrees that everything is centred in Bangsar. "Pang Khee Teik runs some interesting programmes in Annexe Gallery. UndiMsia! runs a program in Hulu Langat. Transparency International runs a forest watch project in East Malaysia. The list goes on," he wrote.

According to Soo, the "… thinking people in Malaysia have always been concerned about the direction the country is going." Three issues concern them and they are the economy, "… when we run out of oil, we will be in big trouble. A lot of our country's wealth is also lost to corruption. There are also increasingly a lot more people who depend on government subsidies, jobs and support, than people who actually pay taxes and contribute to the economy. This is simply not sustainable. Human resource – we are losing our brightest to other countries. And because of certain government policies, there is no meritocracy, and the right people don't rise to top of their profession. A country run by the second or third best, will turn out accordingly. A country will face different challenges at different times, but when you have the right people in place, they will find the best possible solutions for these problems. "

He is also worried, seeing the trends which include demographic changes, and observes that "… by virtue of the fact that they (the middle class) are better educated, richer and are positions of influence and power, have traditionally been the change agents in a country. For a long time, a lot of people did not think that change was possible. But I think after the 2008 elections, there is a realisation that change is possible – people were empowered.  People also realised that each of us have a responsibility "to be the change we want to see in the world", to quote Gandhi."

Fed up of champagne activists

The blogger, Monyet King, is vehement about his disdain of such activism and the actors in it. In an email interview, he wrote that civil society has an important job – give hope. "Yes, most (not all) of the activism and discussion of politics is being done by the Bangsar-types (is there a Subang Jaya-type?). My main grouse is they claim to be the voice of the people when they are obviously NOT. Being loud doesn't make you right nor does it mean you represent the people."

However, he stresses that far be from it that he is against activism and civil society. "Don't get me wrong. I am all for good governance, transparency and the whole works. I am "disdainful" of the "so-called" voice of the people. 10, 50, 1000, or even 20,000 Bangsar-types … cannot represent the 28,000,000 million Malaysians. [I am not saying that I do. I also don't]. Activism in Malaysia now is so closely linked with politics, especially with Pakatan politicians. [note : I voted for DAP in the last GE]. I fully supported BERSIH until politicians hijacked it. I used to empathise with the Lynas issue until it become political. To put it crudely, activists are lying in the same bed as politicians. Hence my disdain."

"Why must the call for good governance be always directed to BN? No activists harped on the shambles in PKR's elections. No activists are consistent on PAS' misdeeds and idiotic practices. Why do activists who harp on the bias of the mainstream media choose to be silent on the lop-sided reporting of alternative media (including the Malaysian Insider that you frequently write for)," he poses.

The rich, by virtue of being better educated, having better access to media, being closer to the corridors of power, are able to articulate and champion causes that are dear to them. Just look at all the recent "causes" that has attracted serious activist and media attention – elections, Lynas, seksualiti merdeka, tertiary education, MRT. These are all urban and middle-class issues.

"I am sure activists have noble intentions. Unfortunately, these noble intentions have serious impacts on resource allocation. By drawing attention on urban and middle class issues, they inadvertently force the government to spend more time and resources here – thereby neglecting other important rural and poor issues.""You see, when (most of) the Bangsar type activists talk, (a) they are only seeing problems and issues that are of concern to them; and (b) they see poor people's problems from their rich people lenses. Both often, although unintentional, lead to misallocation of resources. Hence one of the main reasons why the rich get richer, the poor poorer."

How do other activists feel about this? Monyet King represents a realistic and honest idea of what activism is about in Malaysia. Soo may represent the urbane class, but his opinions are no less worthy than Monyet King's.

The LoyarBurok Coalition, if one can call it that, is a band of passionate, hyperkinetic and driven lawyers. Their office is a popular hangout among the young and activist set. It's not just solely for lawyers though: many young Malaysians who want to make a change have joined the group, and the synergy among them can be infectious. Still, some have made snide remarks, that LoyarBurok is an elite fraternity. Again, it's centred around Bangsar. (LB: Please join us. LoyarBurok is for everyone, humans and apes alike. Click here for details.)

Azira Aziz, a lawyer in her 20s, is an example of the young, enthusiastic activists and volunteers that's part of the KL activist landscape. She is measured in her responses, and doesn't see Bangsar as an issue for activism in Malaysia. "Bangsar is an activist hub? That I'm not sure. Rumah Anak Bangsa Malaysia is in Bangsar since its inception in 2009, I joined soon afterwards, and LoyarBurok, Pusat Rakyat LB, UndiMsia, 50B, came afterwards. I suppose it's more for the convenience. Bangsar's pretty popular with people, it has food, entertainment, offices, affordable structures for minimalist activists' headquarters, etc. Accessibility is also quite good, with LRT and taxis and busses. It is admittedly middle to upper- class onwards though. However, it's not all centred here. Other good NGOs have their headquarters in other areas of KL, etc and not to forget Central Market Annexe, which is full of the hipster crowd who wants to serve Malaysia," she says.

What about middle-class guilt about the state of the country?

Azira doesn't see it as that. "It's more of in the practical sense, middle class folks don't have that desensitised detachment towards the lower classes and yet they are well to do or financially comfortable enough to do something about it. The very rich don't have that."

Activists do not act on pure whim, Azira observes. She has this theory that every single activist has a pivotal event in their lives that changed their perspective or point of view so completely that they initiate projects. They are lawyers, engineers, doctors, business CEOs, and alongside the idealistic university students, they are pretty much ordinary folks who care. They hold stressful/demanding jobs, and yet find time to implement their ideas with the intent to better society. "People do resonate, I believe, when they know of the things that the activists do. They may disagree on methods, ideas and so forth, but that's what democracy is all about.

Marcus van Geyzel, lawyer and curator of LoyarBurok.com sees activism and political awareness as two different things. "Activism is very often used (misused, in my view) to describe activities that are somewhat politically-linked. When someone is labelled a human rights activist it usually comes with the assumption that this individual is "anti-government" or "pro-opposition". This is wrong, and hopefully this is not what you meant by "activism".

Anyone living life purposefully is an activist of some sort, he says. "Similarly, you could also be an activist for your hobby – I know lots of running activists and some very passionate dragon-boating activists. It is heartening to note that there has been a lot of community activism in recent years – people coming together to make their neighbourhood a better place to live in."

Geyzel also says that activism is for everyone, not just the experts. Everyone should be part of the conversation on issues that are important to them. The freeing of communication and information channels via the internet has helped to allow this conversation to take place.

"As for being politically aware, well, it really isn't that important to me. I'd rather people not be passionate about politics. Politics in Malaysia is ridiculously flawed. The system is broken. The institutions are failing us. The individuals, in order to survive in the system, become flawed themselves. There's something wrong with the way that society views politicians as well – why is it that at events they are feted like royalty, with money being spent to make them feel important, red carpet, worship? They are wakil rakyat, not gods. Meet-the-public sessions should be sessions where the rakyat go and ask them hard questions, to make them accountable, not to go and shake hands and pose for pictures and worship the ground they walk on. Why should so many people get police outriders? It is a disgusting ecosystem."

Not the death knell

Is all lost then? Is this the death knell of Malaysian activism because of its bourgeoisie tendencies?

Monyet King is still fairly positive about the state of activism. "Malaysians must know that there is plenty of goodness in this country. Malaysians need to be assured that this land is where our future is. If you keep talking only about the bad things, we will become a nation of grumpy farts. I hope the civil society highlights and celebrates all the good things in this country. Why is it that nobody organises a rally celebrating the great friendship amongst Malaysians, why doesn't anyone organise a rally cherishing the great food that we have, why are we not celebrating all the goodness? I want to see more positive news in our papers. I want to read more good news on Facebook. I want to listen to success stories from Malaysia. [I am not saying that we must not highlight the bad things, we must. All I am asking is for you do not ignore all the good things]. Create hope."

Geyzel is hopeful. "I think Malaysians need to stop relying on politicians to help us, to fix us. To me, it is about a normalisation of revolutionary activism. It is about getting each and every citizen to understand, and fully appreciate, that they have a very important role to play in our democracy, in our country."

"We must not allow ourselves to shrink back into our own, selfish lives, and to just be concerned about our home, our family, our money. It must surely be about much more than that. This is why it is very irritating for me to hear about things like "Bangsar activists" or "clicktivism" or "but she's never even been to an Orang Asli village". We should not be discouraging people from doing their bit. Different people have different commitment levels. It is important that we make the entry barrier to activism as low as possible to encourage more and more people to get involved."

And judging by the increasing number of Malaysians joining in the protests that happen on an almost weekly basis the last few months, it would seem that activism is thriving, and out of Bangsar. Come April 28, Malaysia may be united in one cause: for a clean and fair general election.

Recommended Reads:

The LoyarBurok Book Review: "Perak: A State O...

#International Volunteers Week (2-8 Dec): Don't ta...

A Critique of the ETP (Part 4): Private enterprise...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dina Zaman writes for The Malaysian Insider and The Star. She is now working on her second book, Holy Men, Holy Women, which is being serialised in The Malaysian Insider.

Posted on 26 April 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by Dina Zaman.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Surendran snubs MIC delegation

PETALING JAYA: A delegation from MIC Youth turned up at PKR headquarters today to collect information about stateless Indians from PKR vice president N Surendran, but left empty handed.

Surendran was not in his office and did not turn up during the half hour that the delegation of five waited for him.

The delegation's leader, MIC Youth councillor M Saravanan, questioned Surendran's sincerity in his claim of concern for the plight of stateless Indians.

Last Thursday, Surendran, leading a demonstration at the Parliament gates, said the number of stateless Indians in Malaysia was 300,000, a claim that MIC has scoffed at.

MIC secretary-general S Murugessan, while disputing the figure, offered to work with PKR for the benefit of Malaysian Indians who have been denied their citizenship rights. Saravanan's delegation went to the PKR office today under his orders.

Saravanan told reporters that only Puchong PKR chairman S Murali was there to greet his team.

"We were informed that the details about stateless Indians are not in the PKR office," he said.

Saravanan reiterated the MIC position that 300,000 was a grossly exaggerated figure, and he described as "weird" Surendran's recent statement that he would submit the details to the federal government instead of to MIC.

"It seems like Surendran is living in a jungle and is not aware that MIC is part of the governing coalition," he said.

"We think he is stressed out after making a false statement to gain Indian support and seeing it backfire."

He said MIC was ever ready to help anyone facing "MyKad and birth certificate problems".

According to the National Registration Department, there are 40,000 undocumented Indians in Malaysia.

However, MIC says it has identified only about 15,000 Indians without citizenship documentation since it launched its MyDaftar campaign on Feb 23 last year. Out of that number, 9,529 submitted the relevant application forms and nearly 6,000 have received their documents, party leaders have said.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Pengerusi SPR dan Timbalannya adalah ahli UMNO, sabit tu depa dok angkat teloq UMNO...

NONESetiausaha agung PKR Datuk Saifuddin Nasution mendakwa pengerusi Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof serta timbalan, Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar merupakan ahli Umno.


Saifuddin yang mendakwa mempunyai bukti kukuh berhubung keahlian tersebut, turut mencabar kedua-dua peneraju SPR itu supaya menafikan perkara itu, lapor akhbar Sinar Harian hari ini.


"Saya tahu Aziz ahli Umno, cawangan mana, nombor ahli Umno. Satu-satu SPR di dunia, ketua dan timbalannya secara rasmi menjadi ahli politik yang bertanding dalam pilihan raya.

"Saya juga ada maklumat di cawangan mana Tan Sri Aziz dan timbalannya (Wan Ahmad) menjadi ahli (Umno)," kata Saifuddin seperti dipetik akhbar tersebut.


Beliau menimbulkan perkara itu ketika perhatian umum pada waktu ini tertumpu kepada perhimpunan untuk menuntut pilihan raya bersih dan adil, BERSIH 3.0 yang akan berlangsung pada Sabtu.


Katanya lagi, beliau akan mendedahkan nama cawangan Umno berkenaan sekiranya Abdul Aziz dan Wan Ahmad tidak menafikan perkara itu.


"Saya minta, esok, mereka menafikan yang mereka bukan ahli Umno. Jika tidak, saya akan dedahkan di cawangan mana mereka menjadi ahli Umno."

Anggota panel SPR tidak sep! atutnya condong kepada mana-mana parti politik agar dilihat berkecuali dan bertindak dengan tidak memihak, kata ahli parlimen Machang itu lagi dalam laporan tersebut.- malaysiakini



Top EC officials are Umno members...

PKR has accused Election Commission (EC) chairperson Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof and deputy chairperson Wan Ahmad Wan Omar of being Umno members.


Malay language daily Sinar Harian today in its front page report quoted PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution challenging the duo to deny the allegation.

NONESaifuddin (left) said that the EC's neutrality is at stake as those on the panel should not be members of political parties so that they can perform their duties independently and are able to act without bias to any party.


He said that he had "solid evidence" to back his claims on the duo's Umno membership.


"I know (Abdul) Aziz is an Umno member, his division, and his membership number. It's the one and only EC in the world where both the chairperson and deputy are officially politicians who can contest in elections," hit out Saifuddin.

 "They should give up (their Umno membership), there shouldn't be even an ounce of prejudice and bias that the EC is in favour of any political party," he was quoted as saying in an ! exclusiv e interview with the daily yesterday.


Unless Abdul Aziz and Wan Ahmad deny the allegations by the end of the day, Saifuddin threatened to reveal the Umno divisions where the duo are members.

azlanSaifuddin said that they should have let go of their membership immediately after being entrusted to head the commission, stressing that that the EC should only prioritise the needs of the people.


He pointed out that Dewan Rakyat speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia had resigned as the Kota Marudu Umno chief when the latter was appointed to the post.


"The positions (of the chairperson and deputy chairperson of the EC) are not a political appointment, the Agong appoints them (but) they are still valid Umno members, I want them to deny (it if it isn't true)," said Saifuddin.


Abdul Aziz took over from Ab Rashid Ab Rahman as the EC chief at the end of 2008 after the 12th general election in March that year, while Wan Ahmad was appointed in 2007.- malaysiakini







azlan

cheers.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Use of thugs, gangsters, hooligans a very dangerous trend — Tota

APRIL 26 — Umno Baru has a lengthy catalogue of lawless behaviour. It appears that the rule of law is a stranger to Umno Baru. When Justice Harun declared Umno illegal, the party died.

The new party is registered as Umno Baru; yet the party continues to call itself Umno! The party logo was supposed to be a new one; yet the old logo with some imperceptible cosmetic change continues to be used. The keris on its logo has given rise to detractors calling it a party of pirates! The keris has come in useful for Umno leaders to threaten the non-Malays. Umno leaders have brandished the keris and used implicit threats.

Concerned individuals and groups have alleged that Umno Baru has let loose its mobs and thugs all too frequently to disrupt, sometimes violently, legitimately organised meetings and forums by civil society groups and NGOs. The Apcet 11 forum at a hotel in KL was disrupted by an Umno Baru mob that threatened the participants and smashed tables and chairs to stop the proceedings. When the Suqiu organisation submitted its 17-point plan for the betterment of the country, an Umno Baru mob threatened them with "rivers of blood" outside the Chinese Assembly Hall, KL, if they did not withdraw their 17-point plan. 

Umno Baru used similar tactics to stop the Article 11 Group from holding meetings and the Bar Council forum on the conversion of minors to Islam when one spouse in a non-Muslim marriage converts to Islam. Police inaction emboldened the Umno thugs even to prevent Karpal from entering Parliament House. An Umno Baru mob led by a screaming hooligan, Khairy, outside the US Embassy advertised to the whole world that Umno Baru is a party trapped in the Stone Age.

The rule of law is obviously not part of Umno Baru culture. While proclaiming to the whole world that "demonstrasi luar kebudayaan kita", Umno Baru and its allies have, since March 8, 2008, organised numerous illegal demonstrations in Pakatan-ruled states. Criminal intimidation is part and parcel of Umno Baru's political strategy.

What kind of mentality, culture and religion must a person have to send a coffin or an excreta-shaped cake to Lim Guan Eng, Chief Minister of Penang? On every occasion these thugs have got away scot-free without any action by the police who appear to be conniving and colluding with the thugs.

Perhaps the worst case of Umno Baru lawlessness is the power grab of the Perak state government.  The behaviour of the BN assembly members when the Pakatan Rakyat Speaker was forcibly removed was disgraceful. BN's action was unethical, immoral and defeated the will of the people who had voted for a Pakatan Rakyat government to rule them.

Now a new phenomenon has lifted its ugly head in the political arena — the use of thugs, gangsters and hooligans to intimidate and frighten, sometimes violently, civil society and NGOs carrying out their legitimate activities. Dissenters, protesters and even opposition leaders have become victims of these thugs.

The PSM EO6 support group was threatened by thugs when they gathered outside the Kepala Batas police station. The police refused to give them protection and it was PAS that came to their rescue.

Students holding a meeting in Klang on a Saturday night were attacked by 20 thugs, according to student activist Ehsan Bukharee. The police only told the students to cancel their meeting. The ABU (Anything But Umno) movement meeting at the Shah Alam City Council hall was attacked by a mob on Monday, January 24, 2012.

Recently, people who participated in the Himpunan Hijau programmes all over Malaysia were attacked by thugs. Anwar's car was attacked in Johor. Nurul Izzah's car was attacked in Pahang.

At the Penang Esplanade, Lim Guan Eng and his car came under attack, allegedly by Perkasa thugs. It was alleged the police stood by and watched the violence without taking action.

The recent attack on students camping at Dataran Merdeka is indeed shocking. Fifty thugs dressed in black beat up the students in the dead of night. Their struggle for free education is a legitimate one: 19 countries in the world provide free education. Why can't Malaysia?

One does not have to be a rocket scientist to know who or which party is unleashing these mindless thugs to bark or bite at the bidding of their masters. If there is a poverty of brainpower in a political party from top to bottom, they will refuse to engage in the battle of the mind with anyone. Such a political party is indeed pitiable. Because it lacks brainpower, the only weapon in its arsenal is brawn power.

I hope and pray that the Bersih 3.0 Duduk Bantah at Dataran Merdeka does not provide a golden opportunity for thugs, gangsters and hooligans to do their worst. — aliran.com

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Concerned Citizens to hold PC Tomorrow on Bersih Rally

Here's another CSM for a group of Malaysains standing up for a national cause. Let's support them with all our HEart! ~~ YL, Desi

April 26, 2012                                                             

Dear Editor,

RE: Press ConferenceConcerned citizens call on Prime Minister Najib Razak to allow Bersih 3.0 to go ahead peacefully at Dataran Merdeka on April 28

A group of concerned citizens wish to urge the Prime Minister, Najib Razak, to take concrete measures to ensure that the Bersih 3.0 rally scheduled for April 28 at Dataran Merdeka is allowed to proceed peacefully.

In light of a threat of violence issued by the NGO Pekida, the concerned citizens fee! l it is imperative that the Prime Minister come out to assure all quarters that the rally for electoral reform must proceed in accordance with the democratic spirit enshrined in the Federal Constitution.

Members of the media are invited to a media conference at which the concerned citizens will announce their open appeal to the Prime Minister and explain the need for the rally to take place peacefully.

VENUE: Kuala Lumpur-Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall,   
              downstairs meeting room
DATE: Friday, April 27, 2012
TIME: 11.00am

Please kindly send reporters to interview this event. For further inquiries, please call Mr Chia (03-2274 6645).

Thank You!

Regards,
Dr Lim Teck Ghee
Dr Azmi Sharom
Kee Thuan Chye
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

‘We don’t trust Taib’s brother’

KUCHING: A pregnant woman who was allegedly attacked by an army corporal, Amirludin Mohd Shah, last year and who saw no action taken on her police report said she opted to seek opposition DAP's help because her assemblyman could not be trusted.

Haslina Abdullah who was attacked on April 27, 2011, said she decided to approach DAP Kota Sentosa assemblyman, Chong Chieng Jen's for help because Muara Tuang assemblyman Mohd Ali Mahmud was Chief Minister Taib Mahmud's brother.

"We don't trust him. He is Taib Mahmud's brother. We believe DAP (Chong) can help us," she told reporters here.

According to Chong, Haslina is still traumatised by the incident and had approached him after the police failed to carry out their investigation based on her police report.

Amirludin, who is serving in Kem 511 Askar Wataniah, Kota Sentosa in Kuching had also allegedly attacked another woman, Maryan Asmadin, an Indonesia who was with Haslina.

Both women, who had lodged their police reports at the Kota Samarahan police station, said they were returning from school after picking up the children last year when they were confronted and attacked by Amirludin for no apparent reason.

"He pulled us out of the car, beat and kicked us. Both of us suffered body injuries. We went for medical treatment.

"We also made police reports. But sadly, nothing has come out of our reports. Why are the police sitting on the reports?" asked Haslina.

A year has passed and neither Haslina nor Maryam have heard or seen any development in the police investigations into their reports.

'It's embarrassing'

Said Chong: "They want me to write a letter to lodge a complaint with the (Defence) Ministry and to urge disciplinary action to be taken against him (Amiruldin), if the allegations were true.

"So I am writing to the Defence Ministry regarding the complaints made against Amirludin, a member of the Armed Forces now serving in Kem 511 Askar Wataniah, Kota Sentosa.

"I will also raise their reports with police at Kota Samarahan against Amirludin who attacked, beat and badly injured them."

Chong said both women were also demanding RM100,000 each in compensation to be paid by the ministry as damages for the injuries suffered by complainants.

"The army is supposed to protect the people and the country. In this case, a member of the Armed Forces has attacked two civilians.

"This is most unacceptable. As one of the complainants Maryam Asmadin is an Indonesian, this matter has received the attention of the Indonesian Consulate in Kuching.

"This is most embarrassing," Chong added.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Cummunity Service Message: Come join OccupyDatran


INVITE via the Malaysia Chronicle:) Desi is thinking allowed to join the spirited group TOMORROW NIGHT. Anywan, esp BUMmers, from Furong wanna join me, give me a yell at 012-9702285! YL, Desi

Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:56

We won't go, instead more are coming to join us - OccupyDataran issues public invite

Written by  OccupyDataran, SMM
Rate this item
(2 votes)
We won't go, instead more are coming to join us - OccupyDataran issues public invite
It is now Day 13 of the joint encampment by two groups - the Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia (SMM) group of students which is calling for the abolishment of PTPTN and free education for all (#mansuhPTPTN and #pendidikanpercuma) and Occupy Dataran (#occupydataran) which calls for the reclaiming of public spaces.
From the start of our encampment, the authorities, chiefly DBKL, has repeatedly sought to clamp down on us, despite the peaceful nature of our activities.
On 22 April, DBKL confiscated all our tents and some of our supplies. At the same time, 2 occupiers were arrested, and released on police bail on the same day.
On 24 April, DBKL again raided the encampment, taking away the tents and most of our supplies, as well as some of the money donated by the generous public. On the same day, 4 other occupiers were also arrested, and released on police bail later that night.
Nothing they do will stop us
DBKL has clearly stated that it plans to prevent the rakyat from accessing Dataran Merdeka this weekend: "Action has been taken against those kids at Dataran Merdeka... The same action will taken if you (Bersih supporters) do the same," Kuala Lumpur mayor Ahmad Fuad Ismail said.
Currently, DBKL has set up barricades in the area which was used as our camp ground. As of 25 April, we are still here and standing strong.
Regardless of what DBKL or the police will do in the coming days, we are determined to continue with our encampment. We want to uphold Article 10 of our Federal Constitution, the highest law in our country which guarantees Malaysians the right to freedom of speech, assembly and association.
The reason that we are still here today is due to all the unwavering support we have received from the public thus far. Your continuous stream of donations has kept us going, but most of all, it is the presence of those who come down to sit, eat, laugh and share their ideas with us that is truly keeping this cause alive.
Jom camp with us tonite onwards!
Thus, we would like to invite everyone who is able to come down to Dataran Merdeka today and tomorrow to please do so. To any groups which are fighting for any cause for a better Malaysia, do join us to reclaim Dataran Merdeka as a public space to promote your cause.
For those who are already planning to attend the Bersih 3.0 sit-in protest on 28 April at Dataran Merdeka, do consider camping with us in solidarity on Thursday and Friday (26 and 27 April) night. There is strength in numbers, so let us band together and send the message loud and clear that we are coming together to create a better Malaysia for all.
Now is the time to show this country that we love and own public spaces like Dataran Merdeka which belong to the Rakyat and which symbolise our freedom as citizens.

Jointly issued by
Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia (SMM) and OccupyDataran
L
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...