Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Shahrizat’s long goodbye — The Malaysian Insider

MARCH 11 — Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil's decision to quit as a minister next month is not surprising. Her position in the Najib administration has been untenable since the Auditor-General reported that the publicly-funded  National Feedlot Centre (NFC) run by her family had not met expectations.

What is surprising is the time she took to step down from the Cabinet. Even today, she announced it will be effective April 8, when her three-year term as a senator ends.

"I really have nothing to do with NFC except that I'm married to the chairman of NFC. But as a responsible member of the government, I feel the right thing for me to do is to step down."

"I am not only a leader, I'm also a wife and mother as well. So I know what I have to do and I'm doing the right thing," Shahrizat said, adding it was her own decision to resign from the Cabinet.

In a way, she is helping Datuk Seri Najib Razak avoid the embarrassing decision of not giving her another term as a senator to remain as a minister. But there is already embarrassment in BN as she had defied critics to stay on in the Cabinet.

As many Umno leaders have argued, the Wanita Umno chief should have done so earlier, instead of waiting for the end of her senatorship to make up her mind.

Fact is, her resignation this April will have little positive impact for BN or Umno in the coming elections. She is a popular minister whose ministry has done some good for the people. But her family's alleged business practises using public funds have cut her stature.

And of course, BN's and Umno's stature too. The NFC scandal has brought to focus the way public funds is disbursed and spent. The lack of oversight, the lack of controls and the lack of remorse among those entrusted with a sizeable amount of public money. Shahrizat's resignation now sharpens the focus on the NFC directors. Will there be action taken against them for apparently abusing the RM250 million soft loan? Who will answer for the NFC's lacklustre performance, for missing its targets?

Will the government take back the high-impact project? What happens to the properties allegedly bought with the loan money?

And how will this affect Umno, for that matter Wanita Umno which is seen as the party's backbone. The fact that Shahrizat remains as the wing leader reflects the party's confidence that she can lead them for the general election.

Will she be able to make a comeback if she survives the NFC scandal and be selected as a "winnable candidate"? Or will the Najib administration make a stand that anyone with a whiff of scandal cannot be part of the next government if it wins the general election?

Shahrizat's long goodbye could prove to be both a boon or a bane for BN. What could really tip the scales for them is if the Najib administration takes action against those misusing public funds.

Otherwise, her resignation whether last January or in April will not win BN anything but just confirm that it has been in power too long to know right from wrong.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Are Najib and Cabinet Ministers going to keep quiet about the serious allegations of corruption and subversion of the rule of law in 2007 involving the three topmost officers of the land, the AG, IGP and DG of ACA?

Najib lauds Shahrizat’s ‘willingness’ to quit from govt

PEKAN:   Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak said the decision by Shahrizat Abdul Jalil to step down as the Minister of Women, Family and Community Development is appropriate and correct.

He said the resignation was perceived as a sacrifice in the interest of the government and party.

"Although there is no proof so far that she had committed any offence in terms of law, because the NFC issue has drawn controversy and dispute, she was willing to withdraw from the government," he told reporters before attending a 'tahlil' prayer for the late Tun Abdul Razak at Masjid Sultan Ahmad Shah, Pekan, here today.

Shahrizat, at a press conference in Kuala Lumpur today, announced her withdrawal as the Minister of Women, Family and Community Development when her tenure as Senator expires on April 8.

However, Shahrizat said she would remain as Wanita Umno head and Barisan Nasional (BN) Wanita head.

When asked of her status in the party, the Prime Minister said her position in the party was not an issue because it was different from her post in the cabinet.

"This is because with regard to the NFC case, the debate was her position as a Minister in the cabinet," he said.

Najib also urged party members, especially Wanita Umno members, to continue supporting Shahrizat as the head of the Wanita movement.

"Give her the support and cooperation because she (Shahrizat) has given her commitment to lead Wanita Umno and turn the movement into an important machinery for the general election," he said.

Asked of her replacement in the cabinet, Najib said the matter would be decided later since Shahrizat had a few more weeks before vacating her seat.

-Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Censorship & the performing arts in Malaysia: a case study



THE B*LTIM*RE W*LTZ OPENS IN KL!
Antares mulls over the far-reaching effects of censorship

Paula Vogel
This was supposed to be a straightforward review of a not-so-straightforward play, The Baltimore Waltz by the award-winning playwright Paula Vogel, directed by Rey Buono and produced by the Instant Café Theatre. However, external circumstances sometimes intrude and irrevocably alter the course originally intended.

The play was very nearly cancelled. Indeed, one day before opening night, The Baltimore Waltz was banned by DBKL (Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur aka City Hall) which issues public performance licences for all shows staged in the Federal Territory. DBKL have thus far been, to their credit, fairly cooperative, easygoing and mature about this ruling - until the recent flap over The Vagina Monologues (which saw a very successful initial run, only to have its application for an extension rejected).

Producer Adeline Tan and artistic director Jo Kukathas filed an urgent appeal with DBKL and, after agreeing to extensive cuts, were given permission to stage the play as scheduled. This, in itself, is reason to celebrate: firstly, the never-say-die feistiness of ICT and the cast of The Baltimore Waltz, which saved the show; and secondly, the fact that the show did go on indicates that the people who work at DBKL aren't TOTALLY unreasonable and are, to a certain extent, still open to a little give-and-take. After all, a tremendous amount of energy, time, money, and talent goes into a theatrical production of this caliber – and it only takes one "TAK BOLEH!" to see everything go down the drain. Theatregoers will be condemned to a boring plastic future of uncontroversial plays and harmless frolic – because potential sponsors will inevitably balk at any material that extends the frontiers of artistic expression.

Rey Buono
This is a good time for all of us, whether or not directly involved in the performing and cinematic arts, to reassess how we really feel about being told what we can and cannot see and hear on stage or on the screen. Who decides and why? Censorship, no matter what the excuse, ultimately serves only to retard us mentally and culturally infantilize us. This may suit you fine if you happen to be in business or the bureaucracy – after all, a bunch of docile, overgrown kids are easy to keep in line with candy and canes (or bread and circuses).

Malaysia's censorship laws, like our notorious Internal Security Act, are a legacy of the British administration. Archaic, irrelevant and unnecessary though they be, these laws are a convenient foil against any attempt to change the status quo or overthrow the ruling regime through nonviolent means. I'd like to quote extensively from my review of Chin San Sooi's heavily censored play, Morning In Night, published in the New Sunday Times of August 24, 1986:

Freedom of expression isn't something one can take for granted. Even in merry England, the necessity of getting official sanction for all plays was a centuries-old thorn in the side of the theatre community – until 1967 or thereabouts when Kenneth Tynan led a successful campaign to abolish the all-powerful rôle of the Lord Chamberlain in granting public performance permits.


Robert Walpole (1676 ~ 1745) 


The history of secular censorship in the English theatre goes back to a Playhouse Bill proposed by Robert Walpole in 1737. As First Lord of the Treasury and Chancellor of the Exchequer, Walpole was in a highly favorable position to amass great personal wealth through corruption; he was, in fact, unofficially England's first Prime Minister and not without his critics, who often resorted to the symbolic weapon of the stage to lampoon his inflated political ambitions. Walpole's Playhouse Bill passed into law and all scripts were subjected to the Lord Chamberlain's scrutiny; the Lord Chamberlainship, naturally, was an office appointed by the Lord Chancellor of the Exchequer. The fact that it took the English 230 years to rid themselves of this particular nuisance shows how difficult it is to unmake unnecessary laws.


I hear voices piping up: "But, but… there HAS TO BE some form of control over artistic output or the whole nation will be plunged into chaos!" Well, let's remind ourselves that originally all artistic expression was regarded as the chief means by which Divine Intelligence (or the Collective Psyche) revealed itself to mankind. If we're going to run around hysterically plugging up these channels of intercommunication just because some of them threaten our narrow understanding of life, would that not precipitate our worst fears and bring about a monopoly of the Truth wielded by vested interests? Humans, in their faithlessness and folly, love to make laws, which the smarter ones break. Wise is he who knows how to unmake laws.

So much for censorship. I don't have anything positive to say about any form of censorship – and don't give me that cynical crap about "multiracial, multicultural sensitivities." The only chance we have to resolve any human conflict is through honest, uncensored communication; and the best people to attempt this task are our writers, thinkers, and performers – not bureaucrats and politicians!

How about the play itself? I didn't care too much for Paula Vogel's writing, although I think the play is an instructive study for aspiring playwrights in its clever use of cinematic devices, literary allusions and cultural clichés. Vogel's insights and responses are circumscribed by the intellectual materialism of her academic background. Her script, which humanizes the experience of being gay and dying of AIDS, may evoke sympathy for AIDS sufferers in particular and homosexuals in general - but her typically American (Hollywood?) sentimentality about death and dying came across as trite. I'd have been a great deal more intrigued if she had at least alluded to the possibility that the HIV virus was a top-secret population-culling project of the WHO that went awry. Fortunately Vogel managed to poke some timely fun at Big Medicine, pharmaceutical companies and their professional quackery and chicanery.

Ghafir Akbar
Despite the initially amusing, then annoying, surgical excisions - goodhumoredly captioned with slide announcements like: "UNACCEPTABLE DIALOGUE REMOVED" or "UNACCEPTABLE REMOVAL OF CLOTHING REMOVED" - the play was elegant and sophisticated, and might well have marked a new level of artistic achievement in KL theatre. Rey Buono showed himself once again to be an imaginative, intelligent, and inspired theatre director who combines craftsmanlike competence with poetic passion.

Rohaizad Suaidi
The cast deserves a tremendous round of applause for the superhuman effort they put into entertaining their audiences, in the face of the dreadful uncertainties and bureaucratic stress they were all subjected to. Rohaizad Suaidi was credible and animated as Carl; Ghafir Akbar was remarkably versatile with his multiple quick-change characterizations; and Joanna Bessey was simply lovable as Anna. Theirs were technically challenging rôles – especially Ghafir's – and I felt they could have fine-tuned their characterizations a great deal better without the help of DBKL's censorship board. As things turned out, it was like going to the cinema and seeing a goondu's hand blocking the projector every time an "objectionable" scene came up. Unwittingly, DBKL (as the symbol of official repression) became the fourth member of the cast and their performance was, frankly speaking, shameful.

Joanna Bessey
Malaysians are generally a patient lot but are we prepared to put up with mediocrity forever? Because that's what censorship ultimately breeds. I certainly hope not. It's like granting the butler the power to stop you from leaving home if he felt you weren't "suitably" dressed. Or allowing the security guards to decide what books to order for the library and what books to burn.

An advanced culture loves and accepts diversity in all things and allows free exchange of ideas. It doesn't stifle artistic expression and suppress truthspeaking theatre. Seems like we're a little backward when it comes to cultural maturity.

[First published in kakiseni.com in June 2003]
Some rights reserved © Antares/Magick River You may borrow and/or modify content for your own blog but please credit and backlink, thanks.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

He!...he!... drama 'Mami Bollywood'...


NONE Ketua Umno Cheras Datuk Syed Ali Syed Abas Alhabshee menganggap kenyataan Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil untuk berundur sebagai menteri selepas tempoh pelantikannya sebagai senator tamat bulan depan satu 'drama'.

Syed Ali (kanan) berkata, sebagai seorang menteri, Shahrizat sepatutnya menunjukkan sikap bertanggungjawab terhadap parti dan negara dan bukan bermain tarik tali.

"Kalau berhenti, berhenti sahajalah. Tapi kenapa macam nak main tarik tali. Kenapa perlu kumpulkan wartawan hari ini sedangkan esok ramai wartawan akan buat liputan di Parlimen.

"Ini semua Bollywood punya cerita. Saya boleh katakan dia ini sebagai makcik Bollywood," katanya ketika dihubungi Malaysiakini.


Selepas kontroversi panjang isu Perbadanan Fidlot Nasional (NFC), Shahrizat sebentar tadi mengumumkan akan berundur sebagai menteri selepas tempoh pelantikannya sebagai senator tamat bulan depan (April).

Menteri pembangunan wanita, keluarga dan masyarakat itu bagaimanapun akan kekal sebagai ketua Wanita Umno.

Syed Ali berkata, tindakan Shahrizat itu seolah-olah ingin menunjukkan bahawa beliau tidak bersalah dan peletakan jawatan itu bukan disebabkan rasa bersalah, tetapi kerana tempoh sebagai senator sudah tamat.


NONE"Dia nak tunjuk glamour kot supaya esok ada Wanita yang datang menangis, merayu pada di! a supaya jangan letak jawatan.

"Saya bersyukur dia nak berhenti, tetapi kecewa kerana dia nak berhenti bila tamat tempoh senator. Saya tak faham kenapa. Ini menunjukkan dia tidak komitmen dan tidak berintegriti kepada parti," katanya.

"Kalau saya jadi dia, saya akan berhenti serta merta."


Umno Cheras antara bahagian paling lantang membuat desakan itu sebelum ini selain bekas ketua Wanita Umno Tan Sri Rafizah Aziz supaya tidak menjadi beban kepada parti.

Bung Mokhtar: Patut lebih awal
Sementara itu, Timbalan Pengerusi Majlis Ahli Parlimen Barisan Nasional (BNBBC), Datuk Bung Mokhtar Raden berkata, beliau mengalu-alukan tindakan Shahrizat itu tetapi berpendapat ia sepatutnya dilakukan lebih awal.


bung moktar radin"Ia sepatutnya harus dibuat (lebih) awal untuk mengelakkan keraguan," kata ahli Parlimen Kinabatangan itu.

Sambil menyifatkannya sebagai langkah yang bijak, Bung Mokhar percaya selepas ini pembangkang sudah tidak boleh bermain dengan isu yang sama.
- malaysiakini



Stepping down? Em...em..More like clinging on...

Shahrizat Abdul Jalil's today announcement of her exit from cabinet when her senatorship term expires in April should not be deemed a resignation, said PKR vice president N Surendran.

In a statement issued today, Surendran said Shahrizat based on the Federal Constitution, her ministership automatically comes to an end on April 8 when her term as a senator expires.


shahrizat taman desa pc resign resignation step down 110312"Based on the law, ministers must be appointed from members of either the Dewan Rakyat or Dewan Negara.

"Since Shahrizat's term as a senator ends on April 8, her ministership must also end in accordance with Article 43. Therefore how can Shahrizat claim to be resigning on April 8?" he asked.


Surendran, a practising lawyer, was commenting on the legal aspects of Shahrizat's announcement today that she is "stepping down" after several years as women, family and community development minister.


This comes after she endured about five momths of ridicule over her links with the National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) saga.


Surendran pointed out that instead of stepping down, Shahrizat was in actual fact clinging on to her cabinet position until the very end of the term.


"This announcement is a transparent attempt to deceive the public into thinking that Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and the BN are taking action on the NFC scandal, and that Shahrizat is taking responsibility for her conduct," he said.


Surendran also expressed shock on the Umno women chief's unwillingness to relinquish her party position in a go.


"This proves that UMNO does not have the will, inclination or moral authority to take action against leaders guilty of wrongdoing. Is it because so many of the current Umno leaders are themselves tainted?


"Najib must prove that his claims of reform and good governance are not hollow slogans intended merely to win votes," he said. - malaysiakini


cheers.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Lynas: Why in Malaysia, not in Australia?

— Rama Ramanathan
The Malaysian Insider
Mar 11, 2012

MARCH 11 — Previously I said that the root cause of the Lynas controversy is our 'need' for things that need rare earths. These things include cellphones, disk drives and television sets. I also said that China supplies over 95 per cent of the world demand for rare earths, and that the Lynas plant could supply up to 35 per cent of world demand.

I added that the attitude of the government of Malaysia toward its citizens is less like that of the government of Australia and more like that of the government of China. Much of what I said was sparked by the observation that Lynas has chosen to do something which seems rather strange to those who remember tin mining.

Malaysia was at one time teeming with tin mines. The tin was dug up, processed into high purity ingots and shipped worldwide. We didn't ship ore. We shipped tin. Similarly, we don't ship what we harvest from oil palms. Instead, we convert the fresh fruit and bunches into products which we sell worldwide. Malaysia is a world leader not only in growing oil palm, but also in processing oil palm and it's effluents.

So, why is Australia — a mining nation — not processing the ore into the final product?

I have a degree in mechanical engineering. I've worked in industry in the UK and in Malaysia. I've been responsible for factory design, construction and maintenance. I've been responsible for compliance with statutory requirements and corporate policies.

I've also been responsible for evaluating investment decisions. I have personal experience of reviewing tax benefits, extent of regulations, predictability of regulators, etc. when making investment decisions.

I have a generally good opinion of professionals, shareholders and regulators. I've yet to meet professionals whose goal in life is to harm others, but I know how corruptible we are: Bukit Merah is only one of many proofs of how low we can fall.

In response to my last piece on Lynas, someone commented that one key reason for Lynas coming to Malaysia is the shortage of water in Australia and the abundance of water in Malaysia. I tried to pursue that point, to see if I could convince myself of the logic.

I learned that the Lynas plant is expected to discharge upto 213 cubic metres of treated water per hour, into the Sungai Balok river. That's a lot of water — which is subsidised by the taxes we pay.

According to a Malaysian government website, different states charge different rates.

For industrial usage, in 2009, Pahang charged RM1.45/cubic metre, while Johor charged RM 2.93/cubic metre. (In the Peninsula, the cheapest was Penang at RM 0.94)

If Pahang charges Lynas RM 1.45 per cubic metre, the annual water bill for Lynas would be about RM2.7 million. If the cost of treating the used water before discharge is the same, it will cost about RM5.4 million per year for water purchase and treatment.

How does this compare with the cost in Australia?

I'm no expert, so I'll just pick a number which goes with what seems like an appropriate description. "Metropolitan non-residential water, 350 mm meter," costs RM 5.48 per cubic metre: nearly four times more expensive than in Pahang (Gebeng) — assuming the Australian water authority agrees to supply the required volume.

If we again assume the cost of treatment before discharge is equal to the cost of purchase, the total cost of water purchase and treatment in Australia will be about RM20.5 million per year.

Is the cost of shipping concentrated ore from Mt Weld to Kuantan less than RM15 million per year? I have no idea. I do know the cost will vary due to fuel price escalation, and I do know shipping is subject to risks.

It's hard to believe water drove the decision, but that's what Lynas says.

According to the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), Lynas says it chose to locate in Gebeng because of 3 benefits: (1) proximity to Kuantan port, (2) availability of gas, water and ample chemical supplies, (3) availability of skilled workers.

Nothing is said of the regulatory environment, both with respect to the regulations and with respect to the enforcement agencies. Nothing is said of taxes. Nothing is said of the cost of land. Nothing is said of the cost of chemicals, transportation, etc.

I discuss the above because I am not an enemy of technology. I want the world to be able to enjoy the benefits of televisions, disk-drives and cellphones. I want jobs in Malaysia. I want Malaysia to be a refining influence in the world, to have great workplace practices.

I recognise that investment decisions are difficult — shareholders part with billions of dollars in order to fund projects like Lynas.

Engineers and analysts make assumptions, perform calculations, set up models. Supporting industries invest in upgrades to be able to meet the needs of the new player. Governments should not flip-flop on decisions.

The government of Malaysia now says that Lynas must "accept a return of any residue generated by its factory in Gebeng to its original source." If this means return to Mt Weld, it's outrageous that this wasn't stipulated before Lynas bought the land and started construction. If we insist on this clause, will we have to compensate Lynas? Remember the aborted train project? Note: It is not lost upon me that 'original source' is a very debatable concept when it comes to sludge.

We are so convinced politicians are corrupt, we think the worst about everything. In fact, if you challenge people who support the Anything But Umno (ABU) movement with the corruptibility of the alternative to Umno, their response is "can it be worse?" I agree, it cannot be worse. But that doesn't mean we stop thinking logically.

I return to the economic case for Lynas.

What is the cost of transporting bulk material from Mt Weld to Perth to Singapore to Kuantan to Gebeng? What additional cost would Lynas have incurred if it built the plant in Australia rather than in Malaysia? There are two components to this cost: (a) differences in design due to climate and regulations; (b) differences in building costs. What would be the additional operating costs with respect to materials and labour? What 'inefficiencies' will there be in Australia due to less-pliable Australian employees?

And, what does Malaysia get in return for the savings to be enjoyed by Lynas and the world through greater availability of rare earths?

What's the benefit to the taxpayer?

I searched the MITI website in vain for the answer to my question. In my next post I will discuss the solid waste to be generated by Lynas.

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Sunday, 11 March 2012, 6:28 pm and is filed under Lynas. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Altantuya murder: The invisible hands and who had the most motive

Now that the written judgment on the sensational Altantuya Shaariibuu murder is out, Malaysians and non-Malaysians alike from all walks of life are not surprisingly venting their fury in cyberspace, the teh tarik mamakstalls and the warongs, among other places.

They want answers to several searching questions in the public mind: who gave the orders or directives if at all to the two co-accused, now found "guilty", to blow up Altantuya with C4 charges in the middle of a jungle in Selangor?

One theory is that the duo may not have even been responsible for the killing, as charged, but scapegoats to avoid risking the real culprit or culprits inadvertently spilling the beans. Someone or some group may have decided that the duo was guilty anyway, for other similar killings which they had apparently bragged about, and it was time to erase orterminate them. Or, it could be that it would be very much easier for the duo to escape the gallows on appeal.

Both have no alibi and their testimonies merely contradicted each other. Their defense was an outright denial and there was no motive. So, they have been found guilty merely on circumstantial evidence, whether substantial or otherwise remain debatable, and the Judge curiously held that motive was not important.

Politics or the law at work?
Anyway, the politics surrounding the case called for someone to be found guilty despite the absence of the proverbial smoking gun. In short, it may have been politics rather than the law at work here. The Appeal Court is likely to find that the Judge erred in law when commenting on motive as not being exactly applicable in a murder trial. The age-old four-point test has been opportunity, motive, murder weapon and body.

There's even a theory going around that the duo will never be hanged anyway, if it comes to that, but will walk away into the sunset with new identities. If they hang someone, the theory goes; it will be others who had the misfortune to be around and conveniently available. No one can as yet hazard a guess who these unfortunate "Replacement Killers" will be.

Why isn't the noose around the neck of Razak Baginda as well, the public wants to know, and instead this once co-accused was freed without his defence being called? Razak's affidavit for bail was accepted by the Judge as his defence, almost as a sort of statement from the dock, although rejected earlier for bail purposes.

Why isn't Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, Razak Baginda's "boss", not behind bars as well for what's publicly perceived as "his role in the ghastly affair". Anyway, the public believes that he's guilty as hell, which is most unfortunate, and for this he may yet pay a heavy political price. That would translate into either cold storage or an indefinite spell in the political wilderness.

Najib still reeks of Altantuya
It was not for nothing that former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad told the media not so long ago that, "Najib is yet to clear himself on Altantuya". True, that Najib is the bad smell that keeps following the ghost of Altantuya everywhere.

Najib, it cannot be denied, is solely responsible for creating the Altantuya mess, whether directly or indirectly. It was not sheer coincidence that he was Defence Minister. Does it all really matter?

What matters is that it will only be a matter of time, sooner rather than later, before he's held solely and fully accountable, if not for nothing else, but for extreme political stupidity.

Situation that got out of control

Altantuya Shaariibuu, if Malaysians recall, was not supposed to happen. She was supposed to have vanished from the face of the Earth without a trace.  The Immigration Department records of her entry into Malaysia had reportedly been wiped out from its computerized system. We will never know who was responsible for this heinous crime against the state, indeed treason, unless the Immigration Department itself is in a position to shed light on the matter. That may not be the case.

The fact that this erasure of Immigration records could happen so easily tells us that 'invisible hands' at the highest levels exist in Malaysia. The same kind of invisible hands may be behind padding the electoral rolls in Sabah with illegal immigrants or did away with the Australian insurance investigator who completed the report on the air crash which killed Donald Mohd Fuad Stephens.

This is the kind of set-up which may prevent the ouster of Umno from the government and the opposition alliance, Pakatan Rakyat, from seizing the reins of power in Putrajaya. It may even order street riots to be provoked and emergency law to be declared to help Umno cling to power. Forthunately, for the Pakatan Rakyat and Opposition Leader, these sort of methods don't work. Even despots as powerful as Egypt's Mubarak and Libya's Gaddafi learned this the hard way. Might is no longer right in today's world. All that violence does is to give the Pakatan more reason to hunt down and jail the culprits to the maximum when the coup is inevitably overthrown.

Baginda – collateral damage?

It's highly unlikely that what the Immigration Department was supposed to have done with Altantuya's records had anything to do with Baginda, or cover up for him or protect him in any manner. Razak is nobody as far as the political scene is concerned. In fact, being an analyst, Baginda can be sacrificed in the blink of an eye. He's collateral damage.

They say that Altantuya came to collect a RM5 million commission — other estimates range as high as RM 45 million — on a multibillion ringgit submarine deal but ended up dead. The lower figure is no reason to murder her, the higher figure perhaps provides a pretext when there's a falling out among thieves. In the end, it could have been that events spun way out of control of both Baginda and Najib.

The 'invisible hands' may have taken charge of the mission to terminate Altantuya. The woman was getting noisy for some reason, getting noisier by the day and on the verge of drawing unwelcome public and media attention. This won't do since Najib, by that time, was on the threshold of the premiership.

Who are the 'invisible hands'

It was Baginda's wife who screamed at a shocked press in defending her husband in custody: "It's not my husband who wants to be Prime Minister". Bingo! Umno too could not afford to have mud splattered on its face given the political tsunami of 2008. Unfortunately, a lone fisher nearby heard the C4 going off violently in the vicinity and reported the matter to the nearest police station. If not for the lone fisher, Altantuya would have vanished without a trace, the same fate that reportedly befell others before her.

So who are these 'invisible hands' directing the Altantuya murder from behind? The Special Branch? Who in the special Branch could authorize such a thing and even so, this person would have to report to someone. Who is this someone? As for Umno, which supreme council member would care if Najib had pie splashed on his face and who could be higher than the president of the party?

The whole manner in which the murder was bungled and the way the investigation and trial was mismanaged point to culprits who were not prepared to be caught and who had to come up with makeshift alternative plans to scamper away from blame. In the end, no matter how the deck is shuffled, it does look like the people with the most motive come from the Najib camp. The rationale is exactly as Baginda's wife had shouted.

Hopefully when the Pakatan Rakyat comes to federal power, it can set up a functional Royal Commission of Inquiry to dig into the truth. The murder of the Mongolian mistress is hot stuff and imagine the smear to the country if Hollywood decides to make a movie on it. The damage is done, but at the very least, Malaysia should show that it has tried its best to atone for the crime and is not shielding any political bigwig for it.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Shahrizat to announce resignation today

Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil will announce her resignation, likely from all posts, in a press conference later today.

The Malaysian Insiderunderstands she will make an official announcement at a press conference here this evening.

When contacted, an aide of the Wanita Umno chief confirmed she will meet the media at 3pm at Desa Water Park.

"I can't say more. Just come for the PC and you'll find out," he said.

Umno's New Straits Times had reported this morning the women, family and community development minister will quit all her posts "in the next few days." The newspaper, quoting unnamed sources, said she told a close circle of executive council members on Friday she would step down as minister and Wanita Umno chief.

"Shahrizat told us she wanted to let go of both her posts. She was not happy with suggestions that she resign as minister but remain as Wanita Umno chief until the next party election.

"She sees no point in this. Therefore, she has made up her mind to relinquish both positions," the English-language daily quoted a state Wanita Umno chief as saying.

Another senior Wanita leader told the paper that an aide close to Shahrizat had informed some Wanita Umno members that she was going to resign yesterday.

"However, this did not happen. We are puzzled as her officer was very confident that an announcement was going to be made that day. Perhaps she is waiting for the right time," theNST cited the source as saying.

The Malaysian Insider understands that Shahrizat (picture) was due to make an official announcement last night but this did not transpire.

The NST also quoted other highly-placed sources as saying they were certain Shahrizat will not be fielded in the coming general election.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said yesterday that an announcement on Shahrizat's posts will be made later.

"There are all kinds of rumours. But we will make the appropriate announcement," the Umno president had said in Johor.

Speculation about Shahrizat's fate has intensified in recent weeks, following months of allegations that she and her family had used a RM250 million federal loan earmarked for the National Feedlot Corporation (NFCorp) to pay for personal expenses.

The cattle-rearing company is headed by her husband, Datuk Seri Mohamad Salleh Ismail, and their three children.

It was tapped to run the National Feedlot Centre (NFC) in Gemas, Negeri Sembilan in 2006, when Shahrizat was in Cabinet.

The former Lembah Pantai MP previously resisted calls from the opposition as well as Umno veterans to quit, stressing that she was "only the wife" of Salleh and had nothing to do with the embattled entity.

NFCorp hit the national headlines after it made into the Auditor-General's Report last year for missing production targets.

Since then, the publicly-funded firm has been repeatedly accused by opposition parties of using its government soft loan for purposes unrelated to cattle farming.

These include the purchase of multi-million ringgit luxury condominium units in Bangsar and Singapore as well as land in Putrajaya.

Police recommended last month that the Attorney-General (A-G) charge NFCorp's directors for criminal breach of trust, but the A-G has asked the police to conduct further investigations.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

‘SAS annual report reveals more losses’

KOTA KINABALU: Opposition, Sabah Progressive Peoples Party (SAPP) wants the Umno-led state government to explain a terminology used in the Saham Amanah Sabah (SAS) Annual Report 2011 in relation to the almost RM20 million in losses last year allegedly due to poor investment decisions.

SAPP Youth wing official Clemet Lee said the government must explain the term "Realized Loss on sale of Investment". Some  RM 19,870,833.00 has been listed under this term.

Lee said an explanation is also due on another "Realized Loss on sale of Investment", amounting to over RM 31 million (RM 31,124,228) which is also stated in the same report.

"There is no details provided for this "Realized Loss on sale of Investment" in this report..so the government must explain," he said.

He also questioned  SAS experience in investing abroad.

"Does the SAS investment team have any expertise in investing in foreign securities like Singapore, Hong Kong, Indonesia, and Thailand markets?" he asked.

Lee also took to task Sabah deputy chief minister Dr. Yee Moh Chai, for the still unexplained plunge in the value of the SAS fund during the late 1990s that caused thousands of investors to lose their saving, for remaining silent on the failure to improve the value of the fund.

The BN government must explain why it has failed to increase the value of the fund even after the course of 14 years despite the additional RM200 million government grant injected into it in recent years as announced by Sabah Chief Minister  Musa Aman, he said.

SAPP has meanwhile promised to solve the problem that was blamed on the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997-1998 and is being borne by over 50,000 SAS investors.

Lee said the SAPP would also issue a White Paper that would help pinpoint the cause of the SAS crash if the party wins in the coming general election and forms the state government.

"We will also assist in elevating SAS to its original value, or even let it appreciate higher to a value that it so rightfully deserves," he added.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Meneruskan “Agenda Pemulihan Demokrasi”

KENYATAAN MEDIA
UNTUK SEBARAN SEGERA
11 MAC 2012

Sebagai seorang Ahli Parlimen, adalah menjadi tugas, amanah, dan tanggungjawab saya kepada rakyat Malaysia khususnya penduduk Lembah Pantai untuk memastikan bahawa hasrat dan suara hati rakyat didengar dengan jelas di dalam setiap debat dan perbincangan penggubalan undang-undang di Parlimen.

Oleh itu, agenda utama saya di Parlimen ialah Agenda Pemulihan Demokrasi menerusi mekanisma Rang Undang-Undang Ahli Persendirian. Agenda ini telah saya lancarkan pada 23 Disember 2010, dan ia bermatlamat untuk:

  1. Membatalkan semua Pengistiharan Darurat;
  2. Memansuhkan semua undang-undang Anti-Demokratik seperti ISA, AUKU, PPPA;
  3. Menunaikan Perjanjian Kemasukan Sabah dan Sarawak ke dalam Malaysia;
  4. Menjaminkan Keadilan dan Ketelusan Pilihanraya Umum;
  5. Mengembalikan Pilihanraya Kerajaan Tempatan;
  6. Mewujudkan Kebebasan Media.

Usaha awal saya yang bermula dengan Rang Undang-Undang (RUU) Ahli Persendirian (Private Member's Bill) bertajuk "Akta Pemansuhan Darurat" pada 9 Mac 2011 telah ditolak. Namun, tujuh bulan selepas itu – pada 24 November 2011 – Perdana Menteri pula telah membentangkan usul yang sama yang telah diluluskan oleh Dewan Negara pada 20 Disember 2011 yang lalu.

Ini membuktikan bahawa usaha memulihkan demokrasi melalui Parlimen mampu mendatangkan kesan dan hasil, terutamanya dengan menarik perhatian Kerajaan Persekutuan terhadap sesuatu agenda untuk manfaat rakyat; Perdana Menteri sendiri pada 16 September 2011 telah mengumumkan hasrat beliau untuk meminda beberapa akta seperti AUKU dan ISA yang akan digantikan dengan RUU baru.

Maka dengan itu, saya meneruskan usaha memperkukuhkan demokrasi dengan cadangan membentangkan tiga RUU Ahli Persendirian di Dewan Rakyat yang akan berlangsung mulai 12 Mac 2012. Tiga RUU Ahli Persendirian tersebut adalah:

1) Pindaan kepada Akta Pembangunan Petroleum 1974 (Petroleum Development Act 1974), di mana saya mencadangkan agar kuasa Perdana Menteri ke atas Petronas dibataskan, dan Petronas mestilah membentangkan akaun perbelanjaan tahunan di Parlimen yang akan menjamin ketelusan dan penggunaan khazanah bumi terhad negara secara seimbang dan mengutamakan kepentingan dan manafat rakyat;

2) Pemansuhan Akta Mesin Cetak dan Penerbitan 1984 (Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984), di mana saya mencadangkan agar akta drakonian dan lapuk ini dimansuhkan sama sekali demi memastikan media bebas dan adil dalam menjalankan tugasnya sebagai pelapor berita dan saluran maklumat yang seimbang; dan terbentuknya sebuah Suruhanjaya untuk mengawal selia urustadbir media. Rakyat mahukan laporan yang menjana budaya ilmu dan maklumat berteraskan kebenaran lagi terpisah daripada fitnah dan kepalsuan propaganda. Ini seterusnya akan membuka ruang demokrasi, langsung menjadikan negara lebih menarik untuk pelabur yang memerlukan maklumat tepat dan cepat.

3) Akta Perlembagaan (Pindaan) 2012, di mana saya mencadangkan satu pindaan di buat kepada Perkara 121 Perlembagaan Persekutuan agar institusi kehakiman negara menjadi benar-benar bebas seperti keadaan asal selepas Merdeka. Ini juga akan mengembalikan prinsip perpisahan kuasa (separation of powers) dan menjadi timbang-tara semakan (checks and balances) agar tidak ada salah guna kuasa dan pecah amanah oleh setiap cabang kerajaan.

InsyaAllah, dengan sokongan Ahli-ahli Parlimen dan dokongan rakyat Malaysia, saya yakin kesemua RUU Ahli Persendirian di atas akan dibentangkan, demi Malaysia yang lebih baik.

YB Nurul Izzah Anwar
Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Shahrizat to finish term

KUCHING: Women, Family and Community Development Minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil said today that she will step down in April. Her term as senator ends on April 8.

She added, however  that she will remain as Wanita Umno chief.

Shahrizat has been embroiled in a controversy since opposition PKR blew the lid on the RM250 million National Feedlot Centre contract scandal late last year.

NFC, a project aimed at helping the country reduce beef import, has allegedly been mismanaged.

The centre, is managed by National Feedlot Corporation, a company run by her husband Mohamed Salleh Ismail.

Last week Shahrizat said she will leave it to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to decide on her position as Senator.

Yesterday Najib had reportedly said that he would be making an announcement on Shahrizat's status as federal minister and Wanita Umno chief at the appropriate time.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Mami Ijat resigns as Minister wef. 8th April...

Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil said today she will resign as women, family and community minister next month but will stay on as Wanita Umno chief.

"On April 8, when my term as senator ends, I will step down as... minister," she told reporters at Desa Water Park here.

Shahrizat's resignation comes following months of allegations that she and her family had used a RM250 million federal loan earmarked for the National Feedlot Corporation (NFCorp) to pay for personal expenses.

The cattle-rearing company is headed by her husband, Datuk Seri Mohamad Salleh Ismail, and their three children. It was tapped to run the National Feedlot Centre (NFC) in Gemas, Negeri Sembilan in 2006, when Shahrizat was in Cabinet.

The former Lembah Pantai MP previously resisted calls from the opposition as well as Umno veterans to quit, stressing that she was "only the wife" of Salleh and had nothing to do with the embattled entity.

NFCorp hit the national headlines after it made it into the Auditor-General's Report last year for missing production targets. Since then, the publicly-funded firm has been repeatedly accused by opposition parties of using its government soft loan for purposes unrelated to cattle farming.

These include the purchase of multi-million ringgit luxury condominium units in Bangsar and Singapore as well as land in Putrajaya.

Police recommended last month that the Attorney-General (A-G) charge NFCorp's directors for criminal breach of trust, but the A-G has asked the polic! e to con duct further investigations.

Shahrizat was appointed as women, community and family minister in 2001 and held the post until 2008, when she lost in the general election. She was then appointed special advisor to the prime minister on women affairs and social development, before being reassuming her Cabinet portfolio a year later.



Shahrizat letak jawatan sebagai menteri

 Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil hari ini mengumumkan beliau akan meletak jawatan sebagai Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat bulan depan tetapi akan kekal sebagai Ketua Wanita Umno.


"Pada 8 April, apabila tamat tugas saya sebagai senator, saya akan berundur sebagai menteri," dia berkata di Desa Water Park di sini.

Perletakan jawatan beliau itu dilihat selepas empat bulan setengah pendedahan demi pendedahan dibuat terhadap diri dan juga keluarganya berhubung dakwaan penyalahgunaan dana awam untuk projek Pusat Fidlot Nasional (NFC) bernilai RM250 juta oleh syarikat keluarganya Pusat Fidlot Corporation (NFCorp).

Projek penternakan lembu itu diketuai oleh suaminya, Datuk Seri Mohamad Salleh Ismail, dan tiga anak mereka. Mereka menjalankan projek Pusat Fidlot Nasional yang terletak di Gemas, Negeri Sembilan pada 2006, ketika Shahrizat (gambar) pada masa itu merupakan menteri Kabinet.

Bekas Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai ! itu sebe lum ini menolak gesaan supaya beliau meletak jawatan oleh pemimpin-peminpin Umno dan menegaskan dirinya tidak mempunyai sebarang kaitan terhadap proijek berkenaan kerana beliau hanyalah merupakan isteri kepada Salleh.

NFCorp mula mendapat perhatian setelah Laporan Tahunan Ketua Audit Negara melaporkan projek penternakan lembu berkenaan gagal mencapai sasaran.

Sejak dari itu, pembangkang mula membuat beberapa siri pendedahan syarikat mereka menyalahgunakan dana projek berkenaan untuk perkara yang tidak berkaitan dengan penternakan. Ini termasuklaj pembelian condominium bernialai jutaan ringgit di Bangsar dan Singapura termasuk lot tanah di Putrajaya.

Polis malah telah mencadangkan kepada Peguam Negara supaya mendakwa pengarah-pengarah NFCorp kerana telah melakukan kesalahan pecah amanah, namun Peguam Negara mengarahkan pihak polis untuk menjalankan siasatan lebih lanjut berhubung dakwaan berkenaan.
 

Shahrizat dilantik sebagai Menteri Pembangunan Wanita Keluarga dan Masyarakat pada 2001 dan mengekalkan jawatan selepas Pilihan Raya Umum 2008 walaupun beliau tewas ketika pilihan raya tersebut.

Beliau kemudiannya dilantik sebagai penasihat khas Perdana Menteri berhubung hal ehwal wanita dan pembangunan sosial sebelum menyambung portfoli Kabinetnya.


source:malaysian insider

cheers.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Najib to launch KDM University in Sabah

PENAMPANG:  Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is expected to launch the groundbreaking for the permanent campus of a Community College or Universiti Kadazandusun in Kaingaran, Tambunan in June, said the Sabah Deputy Chief Minister Joseph Pairin Kitingan.

He said the Sabah cabinet had agreed to assist the establishment of the proposed college or university.

"We are grateful to the government for approving the Community College/Unversiti Kadazandusun and a site has been identified in Tambunan.

"We hope the state or federal government would provide allocation for the purpose. We expect the groundbreaking to be performed by the Prime Minister in June," he said when speaking at the Tri-Annual Kadazan Dusun Cultural Association at Dewan Hongkod Koisan, here today.

On May 22 last year, Pairin who is also Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) president announced that the Kadazandusun Murut College or KDM College proposed by the Sabah Kadazandusun Murut Welfare and Education Association (PEKADIN) would be built in the Kaingaran area.

Said Pairin: "I have personally followed up the matter with the authorities to ensure the proposal of setting up KDM College would be realised.

PEKADIN had earlier proposed the KDM College in Sabah to assist the Kadazandusun and Murut communities excel in education in line with the country becoming a developed nation by 2020.

Opposition confusing people

Meanwhile also in Penampang a  federal BN Minister Bernard Dompok accused the opposition of misleading Sabahans with selective the "inaccurate" statements

Dompok, who is Upko president, said the opposition was confusing the people in their attempt to get the peoples support.

"What will happen if the peole are dished inaccurate reports? They will become confused…

The opposition is confusing people with misleading reports so much so they will not be able to make the right choice (especially in the general election)," he said when opening a Komuniti 1Malaysia programme organised by the Sabah Information Department at Buhavan Square here last night.

Dompok, who is also Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister, added that the people now were "faced with information overload" brought through various channels including the new media, blogs and social websites.

As such, he said he hoped the Komuniti 1Malaysia programme undertaken by the Information Department could help in countering the misinformation spread by the
opposition.

-Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

If PM is sorry why not correct ongoing mistakes?

DANIEL JOHN JAMBUN

One of the few statements that caused many people to flip over in surprise recently was the Prime Minister's apology for BN's mistakes which had caused many to reject BN in the 2008 general election. The number of comments in the electronic media is countless, and all negative, angry and cynical abut the apology, with some calling it "pompous arrogance."

There have been many issues raised by commentators at the national level, but my concern is for the Sabahans. Najib had not specified what mistakes BN had committed but if he had bothered to make a list it would be a very long one indeed! As such I would only limit myself to the mistakes done in Sabah. Here is my list of things in Sabah which Najib has to be sorry about. This is a list of reasons why Sabahans feel they are being colonized and suppressed by Malaya:

 
1.      The public service, the educational institutions and the security forces in Sabah are swarmed with people from the Peninsular, while Sabahans find it very difficult just trying to be a teacher, a soldier or a police constable;
 
2.      The Cabotage Policy is still driving up inflation in Sabah with commodity prices having gone up by 200 to 300 percent during the last few years. I believe the policy is being perpetuated because Umno cronies are making millions out of the system;
 
3.      Security in Sabah is still lax. Contraband cigarettes and are found everywhere in all towns of Sabah and the authorities are turning a blind eye on the illegal trade;
 
4.      Felda and Felcra have taken huge swaths of lands in Sabah without going through the State Cabinet. And the plantations bring no financial benefits for Sabah;
 
5.      We were never asked for our views before Labuan was given free to the Federal Territory;
 
6.      Block L and M was stolen from us and we go! t to kno w about it only after Tun Mahathir exposed the theft;
 
7.      Umno came to Sabah and took over the government unconstitutionally in 1994, with the then PM flagrantly violating the State and Federal Constitutions by offering Datuk Dr. Jeffrey the post of chief Minister although he was not the chief of the winning party, PBS;
 
8.      Since the illegal takeover the people of Sabah had never had the freedom to choose their own Chief Minister;
 
9.      After 48 years of Merdeka, we still have 40,000 native Sabahans without birth certificates and yet hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants easily became the new Bumiputeras after being given MyKads overnight through the infamous "Projek IC";
 
10.    The Double Six Tragedy was never investigated. Why? And the book that tried to answer the mysteries over the tragedy, The Golden Son of Kadazan, is still banned;
 
11.    The Federal Government has been sucking Sabah dry of its blood with all its taxes being taken to Kuala Lumpur by the tens of billions for year, and we get only crumbs in return for so-called development. And this despite the 20 Points' guarantee that we would be given the free had to collect and use our own tax revenues:
 
12.    Tun Fuad Stephens was 'ice-boxed' to Australia after he demanded for a review of the Malaysia Agreement after Singapore was expelled from Malaysia;
 
13.    Sabah! is sup posed to be still holding its power of immigration, but how come all the fees collected from immigration processing (passports, visit passes, etc) are taken to Kuala Lumpur?
 
14.    The National Unity Department has failed miserably to unite Malaysians. Many Peninsular people still believe Malaya is Malaysia. Even RTM makers announcements saying, "Nationwide, including Sabah and Sarawak."
 
15.    Religious extremism has increased in Malaysia, and this disease has spread to Sabah. This has caused racial and religious polarization, so all the hundreds of millions spent on national integration programs have been wasted down the drain. And the worst of it is, the PM doesn't even respond when fanatical organizations like Perkasa makes all sorts of statements to promote hatred against non-Malays and non-Muslims.
 
The list can go on. But I wish also to ask Najib one very important question: If you are sorry for what happened in the past how come you are not also sorry for, and stop, all those wrong things which are going on in Sabah NOW?
 
By ignoring the ongoing injustices, incompetence and mismanagement, you are proving that you are not sincere in your apology. You don't know what past BN mistakes you are sorry about, and you pretend not to see many mistakes which are going on right now because you are not interested in correcting them. Your apology has come to nothing because we know Sabahans will continue to suffer under the BN. We believe if BN comes back to power after GE13, Sabah will sink even deeper into trouble because of injustices by BN. I agree with Sakmongkol AK47 that the BN government is a form of "mutation democracy" – a democracy that has mutated into an oligarchy, a government of political and business e! lites. I f you are part of these elite groups you become extremely wealthy, but if you are not, you suffer.
 
DANIEL JOHN JAMBUN
STAR Sabah Deputy chairman, and Advisor for UK-Based Human Rights Foundation Malaysia

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Gamis bersama Anak Sabah Pertahankan Tanah Adat

http://cdn-bm.harakahdaily.net/images/stories/harakahdaily/daily_picture/2012-mac/poster_tabah1.jpg
Gamis juga bersama-sama dengan front mahasiswa iaitu Markaz Siswa Siswi Islam Sabah (Marsis) akan mengadakan himpunan mahasiswa bangkit mempertahankan tanah adat Sabah pada 12 Mac ini di Pasar Seni, Kuala Lumpur pada jam 12 tengahari.
 
Berdasarkan 6 sebab kenapa pertahankan tanah adat yang dikemukakan oleh Bela Tanah Rakyat Sabah (TABAH) iaitu:

1) 977 aduan tidak diselesaikan sehingga tahun 2012
2) Tanah adat adalah mutlak rakyat dirampas tanpa sebarang pampasan
3) Alasan pembangunan dan infrastruktur bagi mengaburi mata rakyat
4) Pencerobohan tanah adat sehingga menyebabkan sistem aliran sekitarnya tercemar
5) 632 kes proses permohonan tanah dan geran tanah menjadi kes tertunggak
6) Rakyat kehilangan punca pendapatan apabila tanah mereka dirampas

Gabungan Mahasiswa Islam SeMalaysia (GAMIS) menyatakan sokongan sepenuhnya tuntutan TABAH bagi mempertahankan tanah adat pada 12 Mac ini dalam Himpunan Rakyat Sabah Mempertahankan Tanah Adat (123 Bangkit)

Penindasan yang dilakukan terhadap rakyat Sabah bukan sahaja sebagai tindakan zalim malah menunjukkan undang-undang turut dicabuli. Kes ini sewajarnya dipandang serius oleh semua pihak terutama pemerintah bagi menjaga hak rakyat.

Berikut antara aduan pencabulan hak tanah adat atau Native Customary Rights Land ( NCR ) yang masih lagi tidak diselesaikan sehingga ke tahun 2012 ini :- 
1. Pemprosesan permohonan tanah dan pengeluaran geran, dan lain-lain (Jabatan Tanah dan Ukur Sabah) = 632 aduan 
2. Pengambilan Tanah/Land Acquisition (Jabatan Tanah dan Ukur Sabah) = 53 aduan 
3. Tanah NCR termasuk dalam kawasan yang digazet sebagai hutan simpan (Jabatan Perhutanan Sabah) = 63 aduan 
4. Tanah NCR termasuk dalam kawasan yang digazet kepada SAFODA (Sabah Forest Development Authority) = 23 aduan 
5. Tanah NCR termasuk dalam kawasan yang diberikan kepada LIGS/Agropolitan yang diusahakan oleh LIGS (Lembaga Industri Getah Sabah) = 6 aduan 
6. Tanah NCR termasuk dalam kawasan SFI (Sabah Forest Industries) = 3 aduan 
7. Tanah NCR termasuk dalam kawasan yang digazet kepada SLDB (Sabah Land Development Board) = 3 aduan 
8. Tanah NCR termasuk dalam kawasan yang digazet kepada Jabatan Parit dan Salira! n = 1 ad uan 

Gamis juga bersama-sama dengan front mahasiswa iaitu Markaz Siswa Siswi Islam Sabah (Marsis) akan mengadakan himpunan mahasiswa bangkit mempertahankan tanah adat Sabah pada 12 Mac ini di Pasar Seni, Kuala Lumpur pada jam 12 tengahari.

Justeru, semua anak muda khususnya mahasiswa dijemput bersama-sama bagi menyatakan sokongan terhadap 123 Bangkit.


Akram Ikrami Taib Azamudden
Presiden Gamis
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Lynas, our benefactor — Iskandar Dzulkarnain

MARCH 11 — What is all the big fuss about Lynas Corp Rare Earth Refinery? It is a 'zero radiation risk' classified processing plant, which means Lynas has promised that there would be virtually no risk of contamination or risk to the population. 

Commenting as an outsider, you won't be surprised at the majority of Malaysians who are agreeable to the highly publicised project. Should there be a hung parliament after the next polls, which will be the indicator that at least half of the country does not have any qualms about LYNAS operating in Pahang State. Lots of articles have been published in the past condemning the LYNAS plant, so I doubt if anyone in the media will publish this article in support of it. So much for freedom of expression! 

Although there are some who calls me a harebrained journalist which I would not deny, after residing a couple of years near Tanjong Rambutan in Perak, but I swear that I was never ever near Bukit Merah. 

Besides, LYNAS is set to open in June as scheduled and its share price has jumped by a walloping 0.6 per cent. It also has the undivided support of the Federal and Pahang State government. So let us look at the cold hard facts before we jump into any irrational conclusion and oppose for the sake of opposing. 

LYNAS is situated more than 20kms away from Kuantan City. Should there be a contamination alert which is a million to one chance; it will still take days for the wind to blow any contamination towards Kuantan City. Kuantan residents are as safe as a bank vault. 

We should thank the Australians for situating the plant in Pahang after scouring the whole world for a suitable place to locate their plant. Imagine, creating 250-400jobs for the local populace at a time when jobs are hard to come by, is no mean feat. Nowadays, with the bad job situation in the country, even the millions of foreigners working in this country are starting to pack up and job hop to other countries. 

Australia is a small island, not conducive to Rare Earth mining activities unlike mainland Malaysia, while Gebeng with its strategic access and superb port facilities at Kemaman and Kuantan Port makes it the perfect location in the world for Rare Earth processing. Really, there is no facility in Australia at the present moment that can be compared with the high tech infrastructure found at the Gebeng Industrial Estate. 

But the 12 year tax exemption for Lynas to operate unbridled in this country could be the actual carrot and not so much for Australia's stringent environmental laws. 

AELB has issued a Temporary Operating License based on scientific evidence and the zero risk classification by LYNAS, even though a storage facility is yet to be found. But AELB is a licensing board, and it is the job of a licensing board to issue licenses. EIA has also given the green light although no comprehensive studies has been done, as the EIA are pretty sure that LYNAS will not foul up like Mitsubishi of Japan. But all is not lost as Four Ministries in the country are directly involved to help LYNAS search high and low for a suitable storage facility. Failing which, our our International Trade and Industry Minister Mustapha Mohd has assured the Malaysians that the radioactive waste would be disposed of overseas even though it may breach international laws. He is pretty sure that many third world countries would line up to receive and store these volatile wastes. 

The idea to send back the waste to Australia and throw it back inside Mt Weld where it first originated is not logistical because of the prohibitive cost. It is much cheaper to store it in Malaysia a few kilometres away from the LYNAS site than to ship it thousands of miles back to Australia. 

Of course, Australia has adamantly refused to accept the processed waste. Would any Malaysian accept their own waste after Indah Water has processed it and decide to return it to their respective customers? 

And should the storage facility leak after a couple of months, one smart alec has concluded that the radio active waste would melt into the ground like butter, so deep that it will reappear on the other side of Down-under(Australia). So there is really no risk after all. 

Alternatively, burying the wastes on Mount Tahan, currently the tallest mountain on the Peninsular would be a good suggestion, as Mount Tahan is situated well away from any populated regions and too far up to reach the water table Another good area would be the National Park just a little south of Pekan, Pahang. The Park is so dense, that no one would be able to find the storage site let alone trespass on it. Today, tigers and rhinoceros has been sighted there, so it is the perfect place to site a radioactive storage facility and who knows one day in the future we may see a three headed rhinoceros or an eight legged tiger. 

The Pahang MB has suggested burying the waste in the disused Sungei Lembing mine. The Sungei Lembing mine is reputed to be one of the deepest mines in the world, with a catacomb of tunnels stretching far below the earth and it would be a perfect place to bury any wastes without anyone encroaching on it. What a great idea from our beloved MB! 

Really, one should not compare LYNAS with the Bukit Merah incident which cost Mitsubishi over RM300million to mitigate the extensive contamination. The Japanese are not as technologically advanced as the Australians. Right after the Bukit Merah incident the Japanese was unfortunate to have another accident at the Fukushima Daaichi Nuclear Power Plant. How careless of them?! Unlike the Japanese, Lynas is a hi-tech processing plant classified as 'zero emissions risk' in the processing of the rare earth. How comforting to know that such rare technology exists?! Even the Malaysian government is impressed! 

Radon gas emitted during the processing of the ore, are not as deadly as nuclear fallout, and it may escape into the hemisphere, scattering thousands of miles away, so Kuantan is not at direct risk. If it rains the chemicals will scatter over a wide area, and will affect not only Malaysia but other South East Asian countries as well. So the risk is equally shared even though Malaysia stands to benefit the most from an economical standpoint. 

'Thorium' a by product from the extraction of rare earth, may be deadly but Lynas has the ability to contain it from high risk to zero risk, repack it and store it in a zero emissions facility which has yet to be identified. Every business has its risks, and if LYNAS is willing to risk RM750million to invest in Pahang and to create a hefty 250jobs for the locals why would Malaysians be so negative about it? 

Besides, industrial accidents are bound to happen. It's just a question of when?  That should not stop us from taking advantage of the situation to excel economically and supply 20per cent of the world's rare earth. 

Kuantan City would be thrown into the international limelight boasting of the largest Rare Earth plant in the world. Imagine the huge economic spin offs, the economic boost and the sudden rise in property prices, while attracting millions of tourists across the world to its famous uncontaminated beaches. 

Lynas Advanced Materials Plant or LAMPS as it is called, will be to many who are not well versed, as just a table lamp or lamp post producer. Most tourists won't be able to differentiate rare earth from red earth, so they will not have any qualms staying in hotels just a few kilometres from the LYNAS plant. 

Should by any remote chance, any contaminants from the tonnes of chemicals used to process the rare earth ever escapes into the sea, the South China Sea and the Pacific Ocean is more than capable to absorb and soak up the radiation, so swimmers and fishes are not at any risk. 

Complaints of LYNAS using inferior materials to build the processing plant are just hearsay, from disgruntled companies and suppliers of resin out to make a fast buck. LYNAS has since replaced these contractors and outsourced for better contractors using superior materials for a lot less. 

Prime Minister Najib has insisted that LYNAS is 'scientifically safe.' So sometimes, we really should learn to trust our Prime Minister, as he always has our interests at heart. 

Should a disillusioned LYNAS decides to pack up and leave, disappointed and sad at our unwelcome attitude, and our hesitation to take risks, all the countries in the world, would be queuing up to welcome LYNAS into their backyards, including the USA, Singapore and Japan, not to mention hopefuls like Zimbabwe, Myanmar and Sudan. 

So, as investors pour into Kuantan to secretly buy up all available properties from unsuspecting owners, even though the properties are now sky-high, Malaysians should be thankful to LYNAS for choosing Malaysia to be their anchor country. Kuantan would evolve into an international class city outstripping Kuala Lumpur, with the status of the most liveable city on earth. And it's all thanks to LYNAS. 

*  Iskandar Dzulkarnain reads The Malaysian Insider.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Indian votes ‘pivotal’ at election time

By Alan Ting

KUALA LUMPUR:  Support from Indian voters will again be key in the country's next general election (GE) as it was in the 2008 polls, say political analysts.

Malaysians of Indian origin now account for 1.9 million out of the country's 28 million population or 7.3 percent. But they feature significantly in 63 out of 67 parliamentary seats in Peninsula Malaysia.

A noticeable trend swept through the 2008 polls when almost 85 per cent of the Indian votes went to Pakatan Rakyat (Pakatan), the opposition pact comprising PKR-DAP-PAS.

Pakatan  largely benefited from the shift in support from 72.4 per cent for Barisan Nasional (BN) in 2004 to just 8.3 per cent in 2008 as a result of issues played up by the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf).

But a discernable trend has emerged this time around: support from Indians for BN has improved, thanks to a number of pro-active actions spearheaded by Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak on fundamental issues like Tamil schools, Hindu temples and education.

This also explains why Najib's approval rating along ethnic lines is the highest at 80 per cent among Indians, according to a recent survey by the Merdeka Centre.

Dr Sivamurugan Pandian, a political analyst at Universiti Sains Malaysia, says that results of various by-elections in Bukit Selambau, Bukit Gantang, Bagan Pinang and Hulu Selangor since 2008 clearly showed that Indian support for BN had improved.

He attributes this to Najib's readiness to engage on key concerns affecting the Indian community and that this support pattern would last through the next GE, especially with Indian-based NGOs playing an important role in monitoring the achievements of Pakatan-controlled states.

Indian swing may depend on HRPM

The academic claims that Pakatan had failed to meet the expectations of Indian NGOs or to work closely with Hindraf, an unregistered but vocal NGO, which had been dominant in the vote swing towards the opposition in 2008.

After 2008, Hindraf split into five groups. One is with DAP, two others are the newly-formed Makkal Sakti Party and the unregistered Human Rights Party of Malaysia (HRPM) and the rest NGOs.

Of the five, the most influential is HRPM, and if it decides to take part in the upcoming GE, it may be able to split support between BN and Pakatan.

Dr Sivamurugan says BN needs to capitalise on Najib's strong standing among Indians in that "one vote for BN also means a vote for Najib".

To do that, BN will have to look for suitable candidates who can convince voters on that equation, he adds.

MIC Youth chief T. Mohan, who also notes the positive winds of change, estimates that the MIC now has 60 to 65 percent support among Indians.

This has been largely due to various factors like changes in the party leadership, more funding for Tamil schools, and more places for Indian matriculation students, he says, adding that Najib's 1Malaysia outreach programme had clipped much of their resentment of the past.

Although some issues remained unresolved, Mohan believes that MIC could get close to what it got in 2004, with support expected to reach 70 to 75 per cent with suitable candidates and provided that "no one makes unnecessary remarks that could hurt the feelings of the community."

Key Indian issues unresolved

DAP vice-chairman and MP for Ipoh Barat, M. Kulasegaran, however, dismissed BN's claim of growing support among Indians, saying that it was unsubstantiated.

"PR (Pakatan) has invited MIC for a debate on Indian issues like the one between (DAP
secretary-general) Lim Guan Eng and (MCA president)  Dr Chua Soi Lek.

"Their (MIC) reluctance shows that they don't have support. They will be lucky if they win or retain the three parliamentary seats they have now," he said.

Kulasegaran asserted that many basic issues like high unemployment, deplorable conditions in Tamil schools, lack of study loans or scholarships and low Indian participation in the equity market had not been fully addressed.

"I believe the Indians still prefer PR for its openness and willingness to speak up for them and attend to their needs. PR (Pakatan) was able to appoint an Indian as the first DCM (deputy chief minister) in Penang and a Speaker to the Perak state legislative assembly," he said.

But now, political analysts feel that there is perception among some Indian NGOs like Hindraf that Pakatn  is "focusing primarily" on Malay and Chinese voters" or handling Indian issues on a piecemeal basis and hence the fear that their "representation" through PR could be lost.

This explains why some are saying that support among the Indians is split down the middle, with both BN and PR saying that they have their support.

Pakatan could be the biggest loser this time around if it fails to garner Indian support as it got the lion's share then.

If 30% of registered Indian voters decide not to vote, it also means that both sides have to compete for the remaining 70 per cent, which is largely split into three unique "segments" — the lower, middle and upper classes.

No mass appeal for Hindraf

Hindraf still has some influence left. If it stays away from the GE, it could cause Pakatan to lose its grip on Selangor and Kedah.

Getting Hindraf on board could mean that Pakatan has to accept demands from HRPM, Hindraf's unregistered political wing, of five to seven parliamentary seats.

Dr Denison Jayasooria, a principal research fellow at the Institute of Ethnic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, believes that Hindraf does not have mass appeal anymore because of in-fighting.

He also thinks that the lower classes seem to be largely with BN while the middle and upper classes are with the opposition.

Saying that MIC's chances would be better than 2008 but not 2004, this can only happen if it fields open-minded candidates who appeal to other communities as well since the resolution of the Maika share issue and MIC leadership change had made it difficult for Pakatan to exploit.

-Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

SBPA Flip-flop a Blow to Transformation

By Kee Thuan Chye
Malaysian Digest
10 March 2012

Najib Razak has just committed another major flip-flop, showing once again that he is the most indecisive prime minister we have had so far.

He has cancelled the proposed revamp of the civil servants' remuneration scheme and reverted to the old one, the Malaysian Remuneration System (SSM). So much for all his talk about reform.

The now-scrapped Public Service New Remuneration Scheme (SBPA) was mooted to reward civil servants with a pay rise but, more importantly, to keep them on their toes. Its key aim was to transform the civil service into an efficient, productive, competitive and high-performing entity. It was part of Najib's transformation plans aimed at making Malaysia a high-income nation.

There was to be evaluation of the work of civil servants, and those who did not perform were to have faced the possibility of dismissal – under the SBPA's Exit Policy. It would have helped to weed the chaff from the grain, to get rid of deadwood. And aptly too, since the civil service is bloated – with 1.4 million employees.

But the civil servants balked at this. They feared that their security of tenure, which they had become so pampered with, might be threatened.

Much more significant than that, those in the lower grades (up to Grade 54) were appalled to learn that under the new scheme, there would be a huge disparity between their salaries and those of the 2,600 officers in the higher grades – a disparity of more than 1,000%. In this case, their umbrage was justified.

Those in Grade 54 and below would receive increments of between 7% and 13%, while those in the upper levels, from Superscale C and above, would reportedly get increments of at least RM5,000.

It was also reported that some employees in the lower levels would be getting a pay rise of as little as RM1.70, whereas the Chief Secretary to the Government would have his salary upgraded to RM60,000 a month, and Staff Grade officers would end up getting about RM36,000 a month.

Naturally, a crisis arose from this. What was meant to be a boon for the civil servants turned out to be a bane for the Government.

The implementation of the SBPA, which was originally scheduled for Jan 1, had to be postponed. A task force was set up to resolve the matter. Representatives from the Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services (Cuepacs) were invited to thrash it out with the Public Service Department.

Najib gave the task force three months to do what was needed. Towards the end of January, Cuepacs President Omar Osman threatened to pull out if three other Cuepacs officers were not appointed to the task force. On Feb 5, the Government acceded to his demand.

Then suddenly, on March 8, way before the three months was up, Najib announced that the SBPA would be scrapped.

Suddenly, Najib says, "this decision would be the best solution for the benefit of the entire civil service". For the civil service, perhaps. But what about for the nation? What happened to his "transformation" plan to make the civil service more efficient, productive, competitive and high-performing – to meet the challenges of a dreamed-of high-income nation?

What he now says stinks of politicalspeak. And what he's done appears to be a politically expedient move. The obvious indication is, he wants to call for the general election soon and he needs to ensure that the civil servants are happy, because they form a big and important segment of the voters. He wants the issue resolved earlier than the allotted time so that the civil servants can get their new salaries and arrears just before they go to the polling stations. Otherwise, why would he be in such a hurry to scrap the SBPA?

Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin may deny that the decision was not made in connection with the general election, and he may deny that the scrapping of the SBPA amounted to a failure in policy implementation, but would we have expected him to say otherwise?

How can it not be a failure in policy implementation when the time allotted for the issue to be ironed out was not honoured? In other words, the policy was not given a chance.

Muhyiddin acknowledges that it was gradually discovered that the SBPA did not meet the pay rise and perks demands of the civil servants and therefore it had to be scrapped. Is he therefore admitting that the policy was faulty to begin with? If so, who is to be held responsible for not foreseeing the policy's shortcomings if not the Government? Why did the Government issue a new scheme without thinking it through?

Another interesting question – is the new scheme meant to merely meet the demands of the civil servants, or is it to meet the needs of the nation?

And what is it ultimately – a faulty policy or a failure in implementation?

Whatever it is, this has to be the umpteenth flip-flop since Najib became Prime Minister. And it clearly shows that the Government is not steadfast on its policy decisions.

Any attempt to make the Government look good as a result of this cannot be convincing. Deputy Higher Education Minister Saifuddin Abdullah says the SBPA turnabout showed that the Government listened to the people. It somehow sounds like a joke – or, worse, a lie.

How could the Government be listening to the people when in the first place, it caused so much disgruntlement by issuing the SBPA?

One would like to think that Saifuddin had more integrity than to spin something like that, but when the general election is near, politicalspeak rules the day.

Perhaps the whole shebang was engineered such that Najib could come riding in like a knight and call the whole thing off – so it would look like he saved the day. That he was the saviour of the civil servants. So that his ratings would go higher. And the votes would pour in for Barisan Nasional.

But the people who would perceive him as the saviour of the situation would have to be people who are not well-informed or those who cannot think for themselves. To put it bluntly, they would have to be simple minds. And perhaps there are more simple minds in Malaysia than thinking ones – and the Government knows this to be a fact – so this strategy could work very well to Najib's advantage.

But to those who can see through it, he is just another wishy-washy leader. So much for all his talk about "transformation". So much for "People First, Performance Now". The Prime Minster himself cannot even perform what he set out to do. He had neither the guts nor the political will.

At this rate, how will Malaysia ever move forward?

* Kee Thuan Chye is the author of the newly published book No More Bullshit, Please, We're All Malaysians.

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Sunday, 11 March 2012, 10:18 am and is filed under Najib Razak, public service. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...