Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Hasan forecasts ‘small political tsunami’

KUALA LUMPUR: Gombak Setia state assemblyman Hasan Ali has predicted that a "small tsunami" would hit the national political arena, with the setting up of Jati on Feb 21.

He disclosed that the prediction was based on solid support he had received in his recent nationwide tour.

In an interview over Bernama's Radio24 programme, "On Radar", yesterday, Hasan said the impression and early response which he received, convinced him that the future of the third force in Malaysia was bright although it was something new in the local political scene.

"I believe the third power block being planned will bring a big impact, at least to the group of Malaysians who already know how to think. Currently, Malaysians have become a society of thinkers who will not easily accept something which is considered stale.

"The presence of the third force, indeed, will become more dominant and big to launch a system of movement which is much needed in Malaysia. My sacking from PAS at the outset, which was not significant and said to have triggered a small wave, has now become a big wave," he noted.

In the meantime, Hasan has clarified that Jati had no problem forging a relationship with any party, so long as the party believed in the concept of Jati's struggle, namely IMR, an abbreviation for the struggle for Islam, Malays and upholding the constitutional monarchy.

Asked on the possibility of Jati merging with other NGOs, including Perkasa, as a means to strengthen the influence of the third force, Hasan said it depended on the parties in raising IMR's dignity.

However, according to Universiti Teknologi Mara's Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies Associate Professor Shaharudin Badaruddin, the third power block would only appear as a strong force and be feared, if certain elements existed.

Firstly, said Shaharuddin, the third force would only get support if the people or voters were already disgusted with the antics and politicking from the ruling party or the opposition.

Other than that, the third force would become more steady and could play its role effectively if Jati and several NGOs merged their strengths, and not stand alone.

He was also of the opinion that any third force which wanted to get the solid support of Malaysians needed to have an element of plurality, that is, it should be well-received by the multi-racial society, and not just one community.

Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

santau #LoyarBerkasih

Print Friendly

Featuring the maharajah commission who has kindly allowed #LoyarBerkasih to feature one of their promo songs for their Loud Kaw Kaw EP, to be released soon.

Judging by the way that he fell
He must've been soaked to the bone
Results came in, it sure came clean
Way, way lower than his sins
Lord have mercy, this sucker dah kena saaannnntauuuuuu…oooo
Aww aww aww aww!
Pray that it don't come out in the news
Otherwise we're all screwed
One minute we're catching up on good ol' days
Next minute ka ni ne!
Lord have mercy, this sucker dah kena saaannnntauuuuuu…oooo
Aww aww aww aww!
C'mon now man, let go of her face
This ain't the right time or place
Hitch a ride home, never heard from again
Nothing but dust, not a single trace
Lord have mercy, this sucker dah kena saaannnntauuuuuu…oooo
Aww aww aww aww!

The Maharajah Commission | Photo by Blueglory Vanes

 

Song emoted by the maharajah commission
2012 (c) the maharajah commission

Recommended Reads:

[Porn Week] Movies with Great Sex Scenes, part 1

"Oh Rakyat": A Song Inspired by Bersih

Curator's Note #LoyarBerkasih

Cerita-cerita pendek hanya dalam mimpi #LoyarBerka...

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Posted on 15 February 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by Farez Jinnah.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

SKANDAL NFC BERTARAF DUNIA!!!

Cows and condos scandal (Scandal NFC) Kini melangkah kepersada Antarabangsa.. berbanggalah kita..



Dengan menggunakan tajuk 'Cows and condos scandal highlights Malaysia's faded reforms,' Scandal Fidlot hari ini telah disiarkan oleh Reuters edisi US.


Oleh itu secara rasminya scandal yang melibatkan keluarga pemimpin UMNO ini diketahui oleh masyarakat dunia termasuklah Israel.

Jika selepas ini Negara kita dibanjiri dengan pelancong dari US terutamanya cowboy jangan terkejut. Kerana Malaysia kini mempunyai satu tarikan baru buat pelancong terutamanya Cowboy dari US..

Ya lahhh.. Cowboy dari US tu mungkin kagum dengan Malaysia, kerana di Malaysia Lembu duduk dalam Kondo.. Lembu diangkut dengan Mercedes Benz CLS 350 CGI berharga RM534,622. malah sebelum dikorbankan untuk dijual dagingnya di Restoran di Kula Lumpur, lembu-lembu yang diternak di ladang Fidlot di Gemas akan direhatkan dulu di salah sebuah Kondo Mewah di One Menerung.

Itu untuk lembu yang bakal dikorbankan di Malaysia, bagi yang akan dikorbankan di Singapura pula masih sama juga layanannya..

Sebelum dikorbankan untuk dijual dagingnya di Restoran di Singapura, lembu-lembu yang dibawa dari Malaysia menggunakan Mercedes Benz CLS 350 CGI akan direhatkan dulu di salah sebuah dari tiga Kondo Mewah di Singapura.

Mungkin tujuan lembu-lembu tersebut direhatkan di kondo mewah tersebut bagi menghilangkan stress mereka sebelum disembelih..

Semua itu hanya ada di Malaysia… kat US mana ada…


*******************************************

Cows and condos scandal highlights Malaysia's faded reforms
By Stuart Grudgings
KUALA LUMPUR Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:14pm EST

(Reuters) - A scandal centred on cows and luxury condos raises the chances that Malaysian elections will be delayed and highlights Prime Minister Najib Razak's stuttering efforts to reform the corruption-prone Southeast Asian nation.

"Cowgate," as it has inevitably been dubbed, is providing rich fodder for the opposition as it digs up dirt on a publicly funded cattle-rearing project that it says was used as a personal fund for the family of one of Najib's ministers.

It is not the first corruption scandal to hit Najib and his long-ruling United Malays National Organization (UMNO), but the farmyard connection makes it a potentially damaging one because rural Malays - the bedrock of UMNO's support - may relate to it more easily than to more obscure financial matters.

"The cow issue is God-given," Zuraida Kamaruddin, the head of the women's wing of the opposition People's Justic! e Party, told Reuters following a speech at a recent rally, which she punctuated with the occasional "moo" for comic effect.

"This time we have real evidence that proves their mismanagement."

The family of Women, Families and Communities Minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil is accused of using 250 million ringgit ($ 83 million) in soft government loans meant to develop the cattle project to buy luxury apartments, expensive overseas trips and a Mercedes.

Meanwhile, the National Feedlot Centre (NFC) project was found by the auditor-general to have done little to reach its initial goal of making the country 40 percent self-sufficient in beef production by 2010.

Najib last month froze the assets of the NFC, which is under investigation by Malaysia's anti-corruption commission. With fresh allegations appearing almost daily on the country's lively Internet news sites, the scandal adds to growing temptations for him to delay elections that must be called by April 2013.

The 58-year-old son of a former prime minister had been expected to call the polls around April, before a looming global slowdown risked hurting Malaysia's trade-dependent economy.

But with the U.S. economy showing signs of recovery and the euro zone not yet imploding, he may feel he can wait and hope for the scandal to blow over while recent government handouts to poorer families take effect.

Gross domestic product figures out on Wednesday are expected to show Southeast Asia's third-largest economy slowed in the last quarter of 2011 but still grew at a brisk annual pace of 5 percent.

The risk for Najib is that the scandal could balloon further or set off other allegations of graft, implicating other members of his government and giving a further boost to opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim. Anwar was acquitted on sodomy charges last month, leaving him free to campaign.

The ruling Barisan Nasional coalition is expected to hold on to its parliamentary majority after historic gains by the opposition in 2008. But the NFC scandal adds to the difficulty Najib faces in recapturing the coalition's once impregnable two-thirds majority and winning a mandate to keep up with his tentative reforms.

That could set off an internal power struggle, with many expecting Najib's more conservative, less reform-minded deputy Muhyiddin Yassin to launch a bid for the UMNO leadership.

"There are people within UMNO who don't want any change at all," said a Kuala-Lumpur-based fund manager who asked not to be identified. "If Muhyiddin comes in ... he's an old fashioned sort of politician and the market won't react well."

FADING REFORMS

Malaysia, once mentioned in the same breath as South Korea and Singapore as an Asian "tiger" economy, has mostly disappointed since the region's financial crisis of 1997 as it struggles to revamp an economy centred on commodities and low-end manufacturing. Corruption has worsened, with the country sliding to 60th in Transparency International's global ranking of graft perceptions last year compared to 33rd in 2002.

Najib has reached out to Malaysia's middle class as a reformer, promising to replace repressive security laws and wean the country off a race-based economic system that has alleviated poverty but increasingly stunted growth, fuelled corruption and turned off foreign investors.

But he has watered down or backtracked on many of his key pledges, encountering ! oppositi on from within UMNO and its network of corporate interests that benefit from the system of ethnic Malay privileges.

Najib announced a significant overhaul of the system in 2010 named the New Economic Model (NEM), most of which has not been implemented.

"The NEM is not only dead but has also been effectively buried under a new avalanche of preferential policies and contracts that run against the open, transparent and accountable system promised," said Lim Teck Ghee, the director of Malaysia's Centre for Policy Initiatives.

Cowgate is a gift for critics who say little has changed on Najib's watch since 2009 other than the rhetoric.

In the first major red flag over its operations, the auditor-general said in a report last year that the NFC had failed to set up a network of satellite farms and produced less than half of its target of 8,000 head of cattle by 2010.

Whistleblowers, the opposition and Malaysia's irreverent blogosphere then took up the baton. The opposition has cited accounting and property documents, the authenticity of which has not been disputed, showing that around 62 million ringgit was spent by family members on -- among other things -- several up-scale apartments in Kuala Lumpur and S! ingapore , land and a $ 180,000 Mercedes.

The NFCorp company that runs the centre is undeniably a family affair, which critics say epitomizes the cozy relations between UMNO and well-connected families and businesses. Its chairman is Mohamad Salleh Ismail, Shahrizat's husband, and all three of their children are directors.

Shahrizat has denied any personal wrongdoing and has filed a defamation suit against two opposition members, including Zuraida. Wan Shahinur Izmir Salleh, Shahrizat's son and NFCorp's chief executive, has said the company was allowed to use the loan at its discretion and that the properties were bought to earn rental income.

Even some UMNO members are not convinced by the explanation, however, and have called on Shahrizat to quit. Influential former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad has added his voice to calls for her dismissal.

"It looks ugly," said Shahrir Abdul Samad, an UMNO member of parliament for the southern state of Johor and a former cabinet minister. "This was an opportunity for him (Najib) to show he could handle a crisis."

(E! diting b y Nick Macfie)
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

EX PETRONAS CHIEF TO HELM SINGAPORE POWER PLANT

Brain Drain? Malaysia chased this "Brain " away!
Another loss for Malaysia while Spore gains but
DOES UMNO CARE? Is Bolehland plain stupid?


Ex-Petronas chief to helm Singapore power giant

February 15, 2012
Hassan has gone on to join the boards of several Singapore energy firms since leaving Petronas. — Picture courtesy of Sembcorp
KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 15 — Ex-Petronas CEO Tan Sri Hassan Marican is set to become chairman of Singapore Power Limited (SP) in June succeeding Ng Kee Choe who will retire on June 12, according to Energy Asia.
The news portal that focuses on the energy industry reported this yesterday, citing the island republic's utility giant.
Marican, who left the national oil company at the beginning of 2010 allegedly due to friction with the Najib administration, has been accepting directorships with several foreign firms in the energy sector.
Among them are Singapore government-linked companies including SembCorp Industries Limited, SembCorp Marine Limited and Singapore Power, which he joined on February 15, 2011. He is also a director at Sarawak Energy Berhad and US oil and gas giant ConocoPhillips.
Marican, 58, was part of the board that had appeared to have clashed with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak back in late 2009 over the appointment of a former senior aide as a Petronas director despite the prime minister having absolute powers in board appointments.
It was reported then that the former aide, Omar Mustapaha, was rejected twice and later appoint! ed only after Najib had put his foot down.
Petronas had also decided not to sponsor the Malaysian-backed Lotus F1 Racing team, going instead with the Mercedes Formula One team.
Marican was widely credited with turning Petronas into the only other state-run major international player in the oil and gas space apart from Norway's Statoil.
The former Petronas chief, who stepped down on February 2010 after 15 years with the company, was appointed a director with Singapore's Sembcorp Industries in June of the year.
Marican's flurry of overseas appointments also comes at a time when Malaysia is grappling with a chronic brain drain that threatens to derail its ambitions to become a developed country.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Knickers politics

Argh…even love is politicized!

From the food we eat – halal or non halal – to who gets into our knickers/briefs – are the daily concerns of politicians, and the religious zealots and bigots.

What is most detestable is that women are always the first casualties. Just the other day, YB Elizabeth Wong's
past returned to haunt her. And for what? Some silly still shots of her sleeping in the privacy of her home.

These were photos allegedly taken by an exbeau but they went viral on the internet. But what of it? It wasn't even nude or porn stuff. It was a blatant intrusion of her privacy and self respect! But this is not the angle that the newspapers have gone to town with. Not sexy enough yaar… but a clear cut case of politicking.

It is politicking to disparage her so that she can vacate her state executive councillor and state assemblywoman's job! It is only to our benefit that Eli is a strong woman.

The recent hype surrounding Valentine's day is another classic case in point of what I call "knickers politics".

Both sides of the political divide turned this ancient day of fun into a political circus. PAS and the religious holier than thou put an "immoral" tag on it. Its a prelude to premarital sex, they say. A launching pad to other immoral acts.

Hey bigots! Get a life! How many bomohs or priests and supposedly moral looking grandpas, professionals like doctors and lawyers, have been raping their clients, wards and grandchildren? They don't need no valentine's day for those hideous crimes!

Ah, what is a bit of smooching around holding hands and kissing your date? Its like these bigots had never been young before. They're probably ashamed of what they've done and now want to police everyone especially strangers they do not know – like you and me!

It's not like I am a great fan of Valentine's. I don't even celebrate the occasion. I like to be in love though. And I am continously in love with love! Many celebrate the day by appreciating their parents, elders, siblings, and many others.

It's unlikely to be religious at all. Who remembers St Valentine, the love struck Italian priest who gave the day a meaning? No one! That's right, I don't even know what St. Val looks like! I do know how Rudolph Valentino look like though, ha, ha!

But people should be given a choice to celebrate the joyous and (for some) sexy day without fear. Snooping around for couples by some Valentine squad – read: bigots – is a super, major ridicolous thing to do, not in a country that spends millions to attract tourists.

To the snoop squad – You're not their bloody parents, ok! You're not even their bloody brothers! or worst, husbands!

Now the Penang CM Lim Guan Eng also took a chance at Valentine's to draw extra marks for his reputation by handing out carnations to women of all races at the famous Chowrasta market.

Okayyyy…the flower sellers and the women were beaming from ear to ear I can see. From photos taken by famous blogger minus one MAC – Chan Lilian, I can see that Guan Eng's strategy also managed to capture the hearts of the female reporters who were there covering the event.

But is the act necessary? Isn't it better for example to give 100 single mothers something to improve their livehood or quality of life with? Maybe put a roof over some heads…

Or else that Romeo act of giving flowers is nothing more than a publicity stunt! And the carnations, unlike the BRIM RM500 (for those earning below RM3,000 per household) from the federal government, won't live to see the next GE, dear….

Advertisement

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

‘Rosmah didn’t help Sarawak women’

Rosmah Mansor's acceptance of a honorary doctorate for her "work" with government funded Permata has drawn scorn in Sarawak.

Prime Minister's wife Rosmah Mansor's conferment of a honorary PhD award from Curtin University in Perth has drawn scorn from the opposition in Sarawak who feel that it is not right for her to accept such acknowledgement for her involvement in the government-funded Permata programme. Permata has 600 centres.

Permata's funding to the tune of RM1.1 billion, they said, came from Malaysian tax payers and was for the establishment of pre-schools, including in Sarawak.

PKR national women vice-president Voon Shiak Ni said thus far Rosmah has not shown any results from her work to set-up pre-schools in Sarawak.

"We are not jealous of her receiving the award. We have no objection to honorary awards given to deserving ones," she said.

"She should have declined the award or should have deferred the conferment of the doctorate degree from Curtin University.

"It is not the time for her as she has not shown that there are results from her work to set up pre-schools in rural Sarawak, even though she has been allocated RM1.1 billion to do so," Voon said.

She recalled that during Rosmah's visit to Kuching two years ago, the PKR women had presented her with a memorandum highlighting issues which included the rape of Penan women and children in Sarawak.

"We also included issues on the need to improve education and health (standards) of the Penan community.

"Unfortunately, none (of these issues) has seen any improvement or remedial action taken," she said.

Rosmah did nothing

Voon said Rosmah had "not lifted a finger" to assist women non-governmental organisations in Sarawak.

"For two years, she has not lifted a finger yet to even response to us or to give assistance to the women non-governmental organisations (NGOs) here for them to help what is necessary for women and children which was brought up to her.

"We wish to tell her this. Set up pre-schools within the settlements of the Penans and the others in the interior of Sarawak immediately to ensure that these rural children have equal opportunity for early childhood education.

"Then the conferment of the doctorate will have been earned.

"We are brave to say this because it is within our personal knowledge that what was demanded by the people in Sarawak is not noted by Rosmah yet," Voon said.

Meanwhile, Rosmah said that her critics might be frustrated and jealous of her achievements which have contributed to her receiving the honorary doctorate from Curtin University in Perth, Australia.

She believed that the award was given to her for the work she and her team have put into Permata, a pre-school programme under the Prime Minister's Department.

Rosmah said that her critics were being petty and that their criticisms had created an unhealthy culture that is not beneficial for Malaysia.

"I don't want to handle personal petty issues. It is all out of frustration. It is all out of… I don't know. Maybe jealousy," she was reported to have said.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Kerana 'bijak' beli gula menyebabkan Malaysia rugi RM491juta...

NONE
Meskipun kerajaan memberi jaminan bahawa perjanjian pembelian bekalan gula di negara ini adalah langkah yang 'bijak', DAP tegas mempertahankan bahawa negara akan kehilangan jutaan ringgit jika harga bahan mentah itu di pasaran antarabangsa terus jatuh.


Menurut Setiausaha Publisiti DAP Tony Pua (kanan), perjanjian itu akan menyaksikan kerajaan kerugian sebanyak RM64 juta hingga RM491 juta setiap tahun.

Dakwanya, kerajaan membuat perjanjian menetapkan komoditi itu pada harga yang tinggi sedangkan harga pasaran sedang merosot.

"Nampaknya kerajaan sebenarnya adalah bodoh dalam usaha cuba menjadi bijak. Ini mengakibatkan jutaan ringgit wang pembayar cukai disia-siakan tanpa diperlukan" kata Pua, dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.

Pada 3 Februari lalu, Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi dan Hal Ehwal Pengguna Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaacob berkata kerajaan telah memperbaharui tiga kontrak dan menetapkan harga import gula pada US$ 0.26 bagi setiap paun.


NONEIsmail Sabri(kiri) menjelaskan bahawa harga adalah lebih tinggi sepanjang tempoh 2009 hingga 2011 kerana harga telah ditetapkan pada US$ 0.179 bagi setiap paun dan ini menyebabkan peningkatan dalam subsidi daripada 20 sen kepada 54 sen sekilogram bagi mengekalkan harga pada RM2.30.

Pua, sebelum ini mendakwa Ismail Sabri (kiri) cuba "memperbodohkan" rakyat apabila mendakwa! bahawa harga gula di peringkat antarabangsa telah naik sepanjang tempoh 2009-2011.

"Mengapa kerajaan menandatangani kontrak jangka panjang tiga tahun untuk membeli gula pada harga US$ 26 bagi setiap paun apabila harga gula terakhir diniagakan pada Disember 2011, adalah US$ 23.42 bagi setiap paun ataupun 10 peratus di bawah harga belian kerajaan?" soalnya lagi.
- malaysiakini


'Smart' sugar move may result in RM491mil loss

Despite the government's assertion that the country's sugar supply deal was a "smart" move, the DAP insists that Malaysia will lose millions of ringgit if the global price of the essential item drops further.

NONEAs such, the government is headed for losses of RM64 million to RM491 million annually, said DAP national publicity secretary Tony Pua (left).

He argued that the government had locked down on the price of the commodity at a "high price"  when it was trending downwards.

"It now looks like the government has been completely foolish in its attempt to be smart and it's costing the tax-payers hundreds of millions of ringgit more than necessary," said Pua, in a statement today.

On Feb 3, Domestic Trade, Cooperatives and Consumer Affairs Minister Ismail Sabri Yaacob said the government had renewed its three contracts in January and locked in on the import price of US$ 0.26 per pound.


ismail sabri universiti malaya 161111Ismail Sabri (right) explained that the price was higher than it cost in 2009-2011 when the price of sugar was fixed at US$ 0.179 per pound, resulting in an increase in its subsidy from 20 sen to 54 sen a kg in order to maintain the price at RM2.30.

Pua, who had earlier accused Ismail Sabri of trying to "fool" the public in claiming that the global sugar prices had skyrocketed in 2009-2011, asked:

"Why did the government sign a three-year contract to purchase sugar at US$ 26 per hundred pounds when the last traded price of sugar as at Dec, 2011, was US$ 23.42 per hundred pounds or a significant 10 percent below the government's purchase price?"

Price of sugar seen falling to US$ 0.18


The Petaling Jaya Utara MP pointed out that Malaysia "overpaid by RM64 million" as the government imports approximately 1.24 million tonnes (2.73 billion pounds) of sugar annually.

Citing a Bloomberg report on Feb 5, Pua said international commodities analyst, the Macquarie Group Ltd, predicted that sugar might fall to as low as US$ 0.18 per pound, projecting a surplus in 2011-2012.

Quoting Macquarie Brasil Participacoes Ltda managing director Carlos Murilo Barros de Mello, Pua said: "Sugar supplies are set to outpace demand by 9 million metric tonnes in the 2011-2012 season that began in October, according to trader Olam International Ltd.



"The estimated surplus has started to reach the market and will increase throughout the year.

NONE"After hitting a peak of US$ 29.47 per hundred pounds in July 2011, the price of sugar has fallen consistently every month - US$ 28.88 (Aug), US! $ 26.64 (Sept), US$ 26.30 (Oct), US$ 24.52 (Nov) to US$ 23.42 (Dec) per hundred pounds."

In the event the sugar price deflates to US$ 0.18 per pound, Malaysia will suffer losses of up to RM491 million every year, he said.

Pua also sought for an explanation on why the government "has to commit and pay for raw sugar imports" when the commodity is monopolised by Malaysian Sugar Manufacturing Bhd and Tradewinds Bhd.


According to Pua, the companies should be the ones importing the raw sugar at the lowest possible prices.

"Shouldn't these companies be forced to compete and not be sheltered by the government from market risks?"

He also demanded to know how the government came to fixing the price of sugar at US$ 0.26 per pound.

"Had we bought at lower prices, instead of having to increase subsidies, Malaysia could have further reduced sugar subsidies without having to increase the price of refined sugar.

"It is now looking like the government is being completely foolish in its attempt to be smart and it's costing the tax-payers hundreds of millions of ringgit more than necessary," said Pua, hitting out at Ismail for "arrogantly" claiming that the government had made a "smart" decision.- malaysiakini



Ini 'smart' bagi Menteri Gula yang blur macam Menteri Agama blur kita tu. Sama ada langkahnya itu ada 'undang sebalik mee' yang membolehkan kroni untung sakan atau Matematik tak 'pass' kot...

cheers.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Moooving Tales in Bolehland!

By Martin Jalleh

Q: What is the nation suffering from at this moment?
A: Cowburn Mooonoxide!

Q: What are the twists and spins given by the bosses of the National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) scandal called?
A: Mooodifications!

Q: Who was the then Agriculture minister who dubiously awarded the project to the incompetent Shahrizats in 2006 and initially said he saw "nothing unusual or anything wrong" with the project and passed the buck to current minister Noh Omar to answer further questions?
A: DPM, Mooyiddin!

Q: The Shahrizats has no cattle-rearing experience whatsoever?
A: Yes, they were moo-clue-less!

Q: And they were given RM250 million in soft government loans meant to develop a cattle project but ended up buying luxury apartments and a Mercedes, and going on expensive overseas trips?
A: Yes, a very mooortifying fact for the country in hard economic times!

Q: What was the PM's initial response in Parliament over the scandal?
A: Najib said it was doing mooovellous! There was no wrongdoing. Production will soon increase to "12,000 cattle from 6,000 previously".

Q: How can one describe in a word current Agriculture Minister Noh's initial denial in parliament of any impropriety in the award of the project and even calling the project a "success"?
A: Mooonshine!

Q: What about Umno Youth leader Khairy Jamaluddin, who strenuously defended the project initiated during his father-in-law's premiership and in trying to douse the growing national anger?
A: Sheer mooollifying!

Q: What can be said of Shahrizat's long and lame logic that there was no conflict of interest?
A: Mooonologues!

Q: What did the cows say of Shahrizat's lame excuse: "I am only the wife of the NFC boss!"
A: Moooshit!

Q: MACC's failure to take any action against the bosses (the husband and children of Shahrizat) in spite of the growing and overwhelming evidence of the misappropriation of public funds, is called?
A: Mooockery!

Q: What did the Minister in the PM's Department, Nazri Aziz exhibit when he declared that the NFC has "breached its loan conditions…The money that was meant for the cattle industry was used for something else".
A: A mooodicum of intelligence!

Q: Nazri advice that the best way to resolve the issue without having Shahrizat resign is for her family members who are involved in the project to repay the RM250 million soft loan?
A: Moooronic, to say but the least!

Q: How can Noh Omar's insistence that he did not know if the NFC breached loan conditions as suggested by Nazri Aziz, be viewed as?
A: Pure "moooyang kulit"

Q: What did Najib whisper to Shahrizat whilst hinting to her to step down?
A: Moooderation!

Q: What was the angry Shahrizat's reply?
A: Mooodesty! Tell Rosmah that when she goes on her shopping trips!

Q: What could have been Shahrizat's favourite childhood game?
A: Mooonopoly!

Q: What did Dr M and Rafidah advise Shahrizat?
A: Time to mooove!

Q: How has the Opposition viewed the NFC scandal?
A: It has been moousic to their ears!

Q: How has the NFC scandal affected Umno?
A: It has made it look more and more like a moooribund party!

Mooore next time! -mj

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Wednesday, 15 February 2012, 6:04 pm and is filed under Martin Jalleh, Muhyiddin Yassin. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Don’t be too attached to your post, Dr M tells Shahrizat

SERDANG: Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad today advised Women, Family and Community Development Minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, beleaguered by the National Feedlot Corporation (NFCorp) issue, not to be too attached to her post.

He said Shahrizat, who is also Wanita Umno chief, should take appropriate action in the interest of the party.

"I am not asking her to resign but we should always think of the problems we are creating for the party.

"That is why, I myself after being too long (in the party) and people were getting fed up of me, had stepped down from my post.

"So, don't love your position too much that you dont' want to let go. One day, we still have to do so," he told a news conference, here.

Mahathir said the party's interest should be the priority in making a decision.

"If we think this will be best for the party, we should take action accordingly, but it is up to her (Shahrizat) to make the decision," he said.

Meanwhile, Mahathir urged the public to decide for themselves whether the out-of-court settlement between former Malaysia Airlines (MAS) executive chairman Tajudin Ramli and Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Bhd was a cover-up.

Asked whether the settlement was a case swept under the carpet, he said: "I don't know. I am not in the government. This is for the government to answer.

"This is a democratic country. If you think the government is sweeping things under the carpet, you can always decide not to support the government."

Yesterday, Tajudin and national asset management firm, Pengurusan Danaharta, reached an out-of-court settlement concerning a civil suit filed six years ago over RM589 million in debts incurred by the corporate figure for the purchase of MAS shares.

Asked whether the terms of the settlement should be made public, Mahathir said, "You should conduct a campaign to ask them to open up and tell people how much of public money they have spent".

- Bernama

Also read:

Shahrizat to stay put, Umno seethes

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

‘Explain, apologise and we will forgive’

KOTA KINABALU: Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who begins a two-day visit to Sabah tomorrow, has been slapped with a litany of questions involving his government's extravagant spending and financial scandals rocking the country.

Challenging Najib to clarify the allegations and speculations of squandered billions and to 'save' himself at the ballot box, State Reform Party (Star) Sabah deputy chairman Daniel Jambun said Najib must clear the perceptions that Umno has "no clear conscious" and prove that he is committed to stopping the rot on Sabah coffers.

"Scandals after scandals uncovered, this ruling party led by Umno seems to be immune of any wrong-doing as if it has no clear conscience.

"To them (Umno), it appears that everything is in order. But today let me ask the visiting PM Najib about some of the most notorious scandals and extravagance so that he may have the opportunity to clarify and quash them while here," said Jambun.

Listing out his concerns, Jambun said Najib must explain the RM500 million commission derived from the submarine deals and the purchase of a similar sub worth RM4.1 billion.

"I would like to ask Najib what is his opinion on the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal that involved a whopping RM12 billion but since its is in court proceeding, the PM may not want say anything but what about the established commission to the tune of RM500 million derived from deals to buy our navy submarines?

"Can Najib, who is also Finance Minister, also explain the buying of submarines worth RM4.1 billion really boost security in Sabah waters?

"Mr PM what about the PSC naval dockyard that costs us RM6.75 billion? Do you call this prudent or necessary?" asked Jambun on the eve of Najib's visit.

He further asked the PM to explain RM964 million Sime Darby scandal, the RM8 million Paya Indah Wetlands deal and the RM1 billion which was wasted on the Eurocopter transaction.

"And please can you also clarify to the people on the RM230 million lost in Pos Malaysia (Transmile)? Or the easier to explain collapse of the newly-built Terengganu Stadium that cost RM292 million to build?

"And what about the repair cost of RM70 million on the MRR2? Or the issue of Maybank's overpaid bill to the tune of RM4 billion?" he asked citing facts and figures which are openly being discussed online but seldom get attention in the mainstream media.

'Look at our dilapidated schools'

Unrelenting in his demand for explanation, Jambun said the people in East Malaysia also wanted to hear Najib's opinion on the current RM250 million National Feedlot Corporation scandal involving minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil.

Questioning Najib's often repeated call for the people to spend prudently, he said the government budget did not appear to reflect the same philosophy.

"Can you please explain to us why has your government approved RM70 million to build a Malaysian sport complex in London which now has become a white elephant? And what about the MATRADE repairs cost of RM120 million?

"Is this all what you called prudent spending in your budget every year?

"We Sabahans, would also want to ask Najib what is the benefit we received in the past 10 years since the Philharmonic Orchestra was established, as this orchestra is said to have swallowed our money to the tune of RM500 million.

"Is it true that its CEO's salary is more than RM1 million per annum?" Jambun queried.

He also pointed out the fact that the government had disclosed that it spent RM3.2 billion in teaching Maths and Science in English over the past five years but had seen no tangible successes.

"Out of the amount, the government paid a whopping RM2.21 billion for the purchase of information and computer technology (ICT) equipments which were unable to give a breakdown.

"The government paid more than RM6,000 per notebook in contrast to market price of less than RM3,000 through some new consortia that was setup just to transact the notebook deal.

"Mr PM, there was no maths and science content for the teachers and the notebooks are all with the teachers' children now.

"Look at our dilapidated schools and the poor students in Sabah, do you say this is "people first"? he taunted the premier.

'We will forgive you'

He said the list of financial scandals was seemingly endless and urged Najib to "spend time and clarify these much talked about extravagances"

He said if Najib failed to explain the it would simply mean that "he did not care about how our money is spent".

"All these extravaganza and ill-conceived ideas of yours are outrageous and unacceptable to Sabahans and Sarawakians.

"We believe this is the reason why your government is losing ground in the whole Peninsular.

"You must do something to quash all this talks once and for all.

"Perhaps, if you are man enough and have a clear conscience, you could just admit it and apologise to us the poorest Malaysians.

"We will forgive you at the ballot boxes. Or is this not-important for you to respond and clarify. You decide," said Jambun half-sarcastically.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

LoyarBocor: Court Order For #HamzaKashgari

Print Friendly

The Home Minister of Malaysia, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein was reported on Monday 13 February 2012 to have said that there was no court order or injunction to prevent Hamza Kashgari to be sent back to Saudi Arabia.

Hang on, what's this then?

 

Recommended Reads:

Attorney General, The Superman of Malaysia?

High Time We All Wisen Up

Tightening the Noose on Peaceful Assembly?

Tags: , ,

No lies. Only leaks.

Posted on 15 February 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by LoyarBocor.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

With higher oil royalty, we wouldn't need anymore federal fund – STAR

If the BN government is replaced by the opposition in Sabah, the state will also be asking for the original promised right to allow it to collect and manage its own revenues, including taxes. "Taxes collected from Sabah alone amounts from RM15 to RM20 billion per year so just imagine how much we are losing at the moment," he said.
 
Daniel Jambun
 
KOTA KINABLU: State Reform Party (STAR) said that with a higher oil royalty of 50% for Sabah, the state wouldn't even need anymore federal allocation.
 
STAR's Deputy Chairman, En. Daniel John Jambun said this in response to the query by Sabah Barisan Nasional secretary Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan who expressed worry that Sabah would be worse off than what it is in now should the federal government under the Malaysia Plan be reduced.
 
"Abdul Rahman is forgetting that under the 10th Malaysia plan, Sabah and Sarawak combined are getting only about RM9 billion as compared to about RM100 billion for the Peninsular," Jambun pointed out. "At this rate of allocation, Sabah is actually getting less than RM1 billion per year throughout the five-year Malaysia Plan. As such, the federal allocations are not much and hardly fulfil all the development needs of Sabah."
 
Jambun also said that if the BN government is replaced by the opposition in Sabah, the state will also be asking for the original promised right to allow it to collect and manage its own revenues, including taxes. "Taxes collected from Sabah alone amounts from RM15 to RM20 billion per year so just imagine how much we are losing at the moment," he said. "So combined that with the retention of income from oil by way of 50% royalty, the income for Sabah per year would be in the tens of billions per year. So why would we need anymore allocation from Sabah?"
 
He said with such a huge revenue base, Sabah would be able to take care of its own education, health and even security costs. "In fact Sabah would be a very rich state and would reach a developed status within a decade or two," he added. "So it is a pity that the BN leaders still have this outdated thinking that we must depend on the federal government forever to develop, whereas the real solution is right in our own backyard." < div> 
He reminded that many other revenues which should rightly belong to Sabah are being taken to Kuala Lumpur, such as the revenue collected by the immigration department, which the 20 Points gave us the guarantee that the power of immigration would remain in Sabah's hands.
 
"From this we can easily explain why Sabah Sabah and Sarawak are the poorest and second poorest states respectively in Malaysia," Jambun said. "The situation of the two states is made even worse when compared with Brunei which stayed out from Malaysia at the 11th hour in a dispute over oil revenues, and Singapore which was kicked out from the Federation in 1965 after two years. So why should Sabah and Sarawak accept an oil deal which Brunei was not willing to accept?"

Jambun added that a study of the total revenue picture in Sabah and Sarawak would show that Malaya is treating and exploiting the two states as colonies. "This must be brought to the attention of the UN's 24-nation Committee on Decolonisation. This is the committee that asked Britain to leave Sabah, Sarawak, Brunei and Singapore," he stressed. "A comparison of oil-and-gas revenue sharing between producing provinces/states/regions and central authorities elsewhere in the world would show that Putrajaya is virtually stealing, and at gunpoint, the energy resources that rightfully belong to Sabah and Sarawak for their industrialisation and economic development.

"The raw materials are now being channelled mostly to the non-oil states in Malaysia by way of oil refineries, petrochemical plants and the like. Rightly, oil royalty or no oil royalty, the oil and gas produced from Sabah and Sarawak should stay within the two states for their industrialisation and economic development, for downstream diversification and for  socio-economic integration."
 
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Corruption is the issue, not hudud

The debate between DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng and MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek is scheduled to be held at Berjaya Times Square in Kuala Lumpur on Feb 18.

A local English daily on Feb 12 reported Lim as saying that he did not know that the topic had been changed to "Future of the Malaysian Chinese" as claimed by some.

He said the original topic given to him by the organiser, Asli (Asian Strategy and Leadership Institute) was "Is a two-party system becoming a two-race system?" .

Lim also stated that it was not acceptable to talk about the Chinese community only as DAP's struggle is for all Malaysians.

Be that as it may, the crux of the matter here is that not only is the future of the Malaysian Chinese at stake but the future of all Malaysians, regardless of race or religion, is at stake.

Malaysia is on the threshold of change: change for the better or remain the same for the worse and the crunch time is none other than the forthcoming 13th general election. This is an inescapable fact. It is the 13th general election that is going to be the decider.

As the debate is on the future of the Malaysian Chinese, Chua will surely bring up the issue of hudud law and how it will affect the Chinese. Moreover, he has always been trying to bait Lim to state DAP's stand on the implementation of hudud which is actually a non-issue.

PAS needs two-thirds vote in Parliament to amend the Federal Constitution in order for hudud to be implemented and be rest assured that even BN parliamentarians will not support it. Therefore, the bottom line is that it will never be implemented.

Thus if Chua brings up this issue, it is only due to his intention to sidetrack Lim with the purpose of trying to create animosity between PAS and DAP.

Unfortunately for the MCA president, his cunning, albeit easily detected ploy, will not work. PAS is a matured and sensible political party and PAS leaders have instead gone on the jugular by accusing Umno of giving licence to MCA to attack Islam.

Scaring the Chinese voters

Currently, MCA leaders, especially Chua, have been saying non-stop that hudud will hamper progress and affect the Chinese way of life and culture and a vote for DAP is a vote for PAS and hudud.

This line of sloganeering by MCA is to scare the Chinese into voting for BN. Moreover, MCA has no campaign issues except hudud. MCA is unable to contribute ideas on how to curb corruption. Has anyone noticed MCA's silence on the Feedlot Cattle-Condo Saga?

It is not hudud but corruption with a capital "C" that impedes progress. Ten out of 10 non-crony businessmen will say that it is corruption that has caused Malaysia to slide backwards compared to the 1950s and 1960s when it was on par with countries such as South Korea who is now ahead of us in leaps and bounds in terms of economic progress.

"Corruption eats into the wealth of the nation," said a businessman investor who is an uncle of this columnist.

For each and every Malaysian, therefore, the time has come to weed out corruption by voting in the party whose candidates can practise good governance.

As BN is too deeply rooted in corrupt practices, it is time to boot out BN.

This columnist has worked in a law firm previously and can vouch for the fact that sometimes a person's file in the government departments cannot be located for a long time but it can be found quickly if RM50 is paid to the file-searcher.

Many a time, people are prepared to wait but sometimes the matter is urgent and so the client is prepared to pay this RM50 or more depending on the urgency of the matter. This is a fact of life in Bolehland, sad but true.

We are in the grip of "Corrupt Culture" perpetrated by the BN federal government. This is in accordance to the slogan of a previous prime minister who advocated "Kepimpinan Melalui Teladan" or "Leadership By Example".

This means that when the clerk sees the bigwigs of the nation practising corruption, the clerk will surely follow suit. As such, it is a waste of time debating about hudud as it is a non-starter and a non-event. The issue that should be debated is "How to eradicate corruption?"

Stop being Umno's lackey

If Chua raises the issue of hudud in the debate on the future of the Chinese, it is obvious that he is merely playing the race and religion card to show that he is a champion of the Chinese and his intention is to obtain publicity for himself in order to boost his chances of being chosen as an election candidate.

Even if the topic is on the two-party system, he will still find a way to worm in the hudud topic.

This simply means that PAS is absolutely right in saying that Umno has appointed the MCA president as spokesman for hudud. How ironic! Is Umno lacking in Islamic intellectuals that it has to appoint a non-Muslim who is ignorant in matters pertaining to Islam to be its spokesman on hudud?

By the way, under hudud, a poor and jobless single mother who steals infant formula will certainly not have her hands chopped off. That is not hudud.

Everyone must know that the crux of the nation's problems is all due to corruption. Hudud is only a topic to divert voters' attention away from the major issues at hand; issues such as the growing national debt, ever-rising inflation, sky-rocketing price of goods, wage-stagnation, crime rate, social problems caused by the influx of foreign workers, etc.

It is time MCA stopped being Umno's lackey by trying to dupe the Chinese into voting for BN in order for the plundering to continue till the cows come home.

Speaking of cows, the investigation by the MACC is still progressing very, very slowly in regard to the Feedlot matter. Perhaps this inertia will eventually lead to the Malaysian voters forgetting the Feedlot issue altogether when the 13th general election is called.

Maybe that is what the BN leaders are waiting for as the Malaysian voters do not have elephantine memory.

Selena Tay is a FMT columnist.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Anwar’s lawyer in ‘qazaf’ case sued for RM10m

KUALA LUMPUR: The lawyer representing Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim in his "qazaf" (criminal defamation) case, Kamar Ainiah Kamaruzaman, and her legal firm are being sued for RM10 million over her statement which was posted in Malaysiakini and HarakahDaily.

The suit was filed by the Muslim Lawyers Association (PPMM) president Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar by Zainul Rijal through the legal firm of Messrs J.S. Pillay & Mohd Haaziq two days ago at the High Court here.

Kamar Ainiah and her legal firm, Messrs Kamar Ainiah, Razif & Zashidi, were named as respondents in the suit.

The matter has been fixed for case management before High Court judge Vazeer Alam on March 14, Zainul Rijal said in a press statement here today.

Zainul Rijal filed the suit over a statement made by Kamar Ainiah to the media when she was met by journalists at the Federal Territory Syariah Court Complex in August last year.

He claimed that the statement by Kamar Ainiah had defamed him and intended to give a bad image of him as a lawyer and businessman.

He is seeking, among others, an order for the postings of the alleged defamatory words to be stopped immediately and an apology, to be posted on Malaysiakini and Harakahdaily portals continuously for a week.

Zainul Rijal is also seeking general damages of RM10 million, as well as special, aggravated and exemplary damages.

- Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Malaysia in the Era of Globalization #100

By M. Bakri Musa

Chapter 12: A Prescription For Malaysia

An Open Letter to the Prime Minister

May 13, 2002

The Next Young Mahathir

Today you are busy attending to the nation's business. Rightly so, but I do hope that you ponder these questions and answer them in your memoirs. Subsequent generations need to learn the lesson. In the remaining years you must concentrate not on party or policy, but on personnel. You once quipped that you would like to be succeeded by your clone. Alas, there is no young Mahathir out there. Sadly, this more than anything else is the most glaring failure of your leadership.

Finding the next cadre of leaders will not be easy. While previous generations were inspired by the struggle for freedom, no such inspirations exist now. Today's young Mahathirs, if they have not already succumbed to the lures of the First World, are busy pitting their talent in the highly lucrative private sector. You must make a personal and concerted effort at talent scouting. Fortunately, again thanks to the successes of your very policies, there are many capable Malaysians. Finding them would not be difficult, but enticing them into public service would be the challenge. There will be a few who, having reached the peak of their career and having put aside a comfortable nest egg, would consider public service a noble calling. Grab them. Under your masterful tutelage, these fast learners would grasp the political skills soon enough. You will also find them to be a different breed from the ones currently serving you.

Should you restrict yourself to your party, there will be slim pickings. Your track record at talent scouting thus far, to put it charitably, is less than spectacular. You had better luck recently with your choice of a new chief justice in the person of Dzaiddin Abdullah. That one wise pick did more to enhance the judiciary than all your speeches. This should remind you of the importance of personnel.

The legacy of a parent is their children; a leader, his successor. There is ample time yet for you to enhance your legacy and with it, to secure the nation's future.

You have repeatedly grumbled on the lack of Malays in business, and just as predictably, you have denigrated Malay aptitude for and competence in commerce. I again respectfully suggest that you have it all wrong. Malays are indeed shrewd businessmen, Malaysian style that is. The role models you have provided them have been the Halim Saads and Tajuddin Ramlis. These individuals are handsomely rewarded not for their expertise or entrepreneurialism, rather on their coziness with you. Other budding entrepreneurs learn quickly that to succeed, they too need not pay attention to their clients and customers but suck up to the politically powerful. The road to riches in Malaysia is not through creating and building, but getting the right contacts and contracts. You have created a class not of builders and creators, but of rent collectors and economic parasites.

You frequently lamented to the faithful on the evils of money politics. You have now finally admitted the obvious: UMNO is corrupt to the core. It is no longer only a political party, but a massive and insatiably greedy patronage system. The most comical if not bizarre episode was when UMNO Vice President Muhammad Taib too, condemned corruption. This from a man who was caught with millions in cash in his back pocket! Next you will have Mona Fendi [the woman who killed a senior politician out of greed and lust] lecture us on personal morality! Do you ever wonder why such messages fall on deaf ears?

You were shocked that in the last election [1999] only non-Malays appreciated your brilliant stewardship. Malays were, to paraphrase you, stupid, forgetful and ungrateful. It finally dawned on you that your party has lost the support of Malays. It took you and your fellow party leaders this long to appreciate this fact, as the loss was not reflected in the number of parliamentary seats your party won. You were shrewd enough to spare your party a humiliating thrashing through smart political maneuvering. You wisely called the election just before thousands of newly registered young and disillusioned voters became eligible. Others may carp but I salute your brilliant political move. Such tricks however, only work once.

It is my contention that Malays voted for PAS not because they were enamored with that party or that they were impressed with its leadership, rather they were fed up with the corruption (or money politics, as you euphemistically phrase it) of UMNO.

The next election will be different. If your party does not change radically there will be an implosion. Although I predict that your party will again return to power, it will be denied its two-thirds majority. UMNO will suffer the humiliation of winning fewer seats than PAS. To add insult to injury, your home state of Kedah will fall to PAS. To rub salt on a raw wound, your long-held Kubang Pasu seat, should you not contest it, will also go to the opposition.

Nothing would please me more than to be proven wrong. Perversely the 9/11 terrorists' attacks on America could prove to be your and your party's savior. No, it has nothing to do with your swift condemnation of those abominable acts—you were absolutely right in quickly denouncing those despicable terrorists—rather it has everything to do with the unbelievably stupid reactions of the leaders of PAS. I have never been impressed with the senior leadership of that party, and their behavior following those horrible tragedies merely confirmed my worse suspicion of them. I have every reason to believe that they will continue their present pattern. But it would take more than the floundering of PAS to reverse the fate of your party.

Malaysians have changed and you can rightfully claim credit for many of those changes. But you are now like an insecure mother who does not notice the subtle changes in her brood, and continue to force-feed them the same pablum to her fully grown children. And when they protest or rebel, she puts on a guilt trip about being ungrateful. Wise parents recognize that the chidings and reprimands that work in childhood are counterproductive on teenagers and grownups.

Instead of continually berating us, I suggest that you provide us with the necessary ladders and safety net. With enough ladders our people will climb up without your having to exhort them. With an adequate safety net below they will be further emboldened. But do not repeat the mistakes of Western democracies by making too elaborate a social safety net. Too comfortable a safety net and it becomes a hammock, and Malaysians would then succumb to our own version of the "British disease" of social welfarism rampant during the pre-Thatcher era. In many ways our special privileges are doing that now to Bumiputras. The programs are becoming too cushy; they lull instead of invigorating Malays.

As for ladders, an effective one would be an excellent school system and relevant curricula. We must make all our young fluently bilingual, science literate, and mathematically competent, whether they want to be an alim or a scientist.

You have concentrated on physical infrastructures in the past. Now I implore you to emphasize our most precious assets – our people. You are mighty proud of our airport being among the best, we should likewise aim for our universities and schools to be the same.

You never miss to take foreign visitors to see your new pride and joy, the Petronas Twin Towers. Sadly, the only thing Malaysian about that monument is the land on which it is built. Everything else, from the design to the laying of the bricks, was done by foreigners. Wouldn't it be nice if our universities and research centers too were of such eminence that foreigners would want to visit them?

You have repeatedly reminded us of Allah's bounty on our land. Not only are we spared many of nature's calamities, we are also blessed with some of the richest resources. Our warm waters and pristine beaches are the envy of the world; they would be prime tourist destinations especially for those from the West. You repeatedly sent trade missions to the West to drum up potential investments. But we cannot begin to attract tourists or investors if we continually denigrate their culture. We have enough problems of our own culture; there is no need for us to lecture others. Besides, they have their own critics who are much more eloquent and effective. Quit worrying about the degeneration of the West and concentrate instead on reversing the deterioration of Malaysia.

So the next time you address us, consider this. If you think that we have not changed under your leadership for the past twenty years, it is unlikely that we would ever do so in the few remaining years you have. Relent. Encourage us instead; it might just work. Do not besmirch your wonderful legacy by having us remember you as other than an esteemed leader.

Respectfully,
M. Bakri Musa

[This concludes the serialization of my book, Malaysia in the Era of Globalization, published in June 2002.]

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Wednesday, 15 February 2012, 3:28 pm and is filed under Mahathir. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.  

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Whither the Indian community?

KUALA LUMPUR: Najib Tun Razak was a beleaguered politician at the Thaipusam celebrations at Batu Caves on Feb 7, 2012. Many listened intently as he appealed to the Indian community of largely Tamil descent to place and put their 'Nambikei' (trust) in him.

This was not a whimsical appeal. In the run up to the last general election, towards the end of 2007, the Hindraf episode was the wake up call to Umno-BN that their long held sway and hold on Malaysians was now to be put to a stern test.

A much maligned BN tottered virtually on the edge of defeat and only just managed to stave off the effects of a political tsunami. The lessons of that episode still rankles in the minds of BN leaders and they are aware that the Indian votes in the 13th GE could prove decisive to both sides of the political divide.

The Indians are savouring their moments of glory and greatly relishing the overtures of Najib's "Nambikei" and have even cheekily requested for a two-day Deepavali holiday. The BN views them as prime voters whose votes they want to build upon to maintain their grip on power, and later, as envisaged, to firm up and tighten this grip once more as before.

While the Chinese community appear to have all but deserted the MCA and Gerakan to opt for DAP, and the Malays are skewered three-ways between PAS, PKR and Umno, the Indians are being wooed by BN as Pakatan appear to have offered them not much so far.

Can and should Indians put their trust in the call of the prime minister? Perhaps it is up to each individual Indian voter to do some soul searching before casting their precious vote, as much is at stake and they should certainly not play their cards wrongly.

The Indian community is under much stress and things are not looking up for them right. Their future is in limbo and this is due to a number of factors. But the community should learn to sit up and pay heed to where they are heading in the quagmire of the currently changing Malaysian political landscape.

Dwindling population

Long considered the third largest ethnic group in Malaysia, the community's dwindling population needs to be addressed or they will see themselves being eclipsed by persons of Indonesian origin as the third largest race in the country.

In the past, if the community had any difficulty, it was the exceedingly high birth rate. The birth of large numbers of infants in an Indian family caused much hardship and deprivation to them.

This was especially true among the families working and residing in the rubber plantations in the rural areas. While in the past this population explosion was viewed with concern, now it is the declining birth rate among Indians that is of concern.

Falling birth rates among Indians have reached alarming proportions. Indians constitute only 9% of the population of the nation as opposed to much higher percentages in the last few decades.

Wither the Indian community in Malaysia? This certainly means that Indians as a race have in all probability been displaced as the third major component or racial group with the influx of Indonesian immigrants.

There are a number of factors that have led to the Malaysian Indian population dwindling. The most important is that the strength of their economic status has been downgraded, causing them to either not marry or have few children in the event they are married couples.

Another important factor is the emigration of highly qualified and educated individuals, who have left Malaysia for greener pastures. Their departure along with their families in tow has resulted in the Indian population to dwindle further.

What is now becoming a bigger worry is the number of Indian youth who are opting to stay single or tying the knot at much older ages, usually well past their prime and causing the number of childless marriages among Indians to go on the rise.

While the Chinese community has addressed this problem by forming Cupid Clubs to play matchmaker and get single Chinese men and women to court and marry, the same measure may have to be adopted by Indian groups representing the community.

The formation of Cupid Clubs have resulted in a greater number of marriages taking place within the Chinese community. The Indian groups can also play a similar matchmaker role among single Indian men and women.

Wake up call for Indians

While the Indian community needs to repopulate itself, there is also a dire need for them to reinvent themselves in the sphere of economic activity so as to gain a larger share of the economic pie.

While on this front, several groups representing the interests of the Indian community have taken upon themselves the role to empower Indians by creating business and educational opportunities, the momentum needs to be sustained and to grow much further.

The admission of Indian students to public and private institutions of higher learning in this country has also witnessed a drastic drop in numbers. The reluctance of a growing number of Indian youths to secure a sound education and a brighter future is now glaringly evident.

Instead, what is happening is that Indian youth are more likely to be associated or linked with criminal and underworld activities, with Malaysian jails housing large numbers of Indian prisoners in ratio to the numbers of their population.

This has caused the socio-economic status of the Indian to downgrade rapidly. There is a need by Indian groups representing and leading the Indian community to be more watchful and vigilant and to steer Indians, especially Indian youth, in the right direction.

While all is not lost, the Indian community needs to wake up to the challenges of a globalised world or they will only have themselves to blame for becoming failures in their own country.

The need is urgent and pressing that Indians in Malaysia not go into a time warp but be aware that they are a species under threat and in all likelihood may not count or favour anymore as voters or as an important ethnic group in the years to come.

It is therefore imperative that Indians rise up and answer this wake up call to pull the community out of the doldrums and to strive to contribute in a greater and more meaningful and impactful way towards building a better Malaysian society.

The writer has been teaching and writing throughout Asia since 1984.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

A Critique of the ETP Part 3 (ii): The hothouse labs probably killed innovation

Print Friendly

In our Selected Exhortations category, we republish interesting stuff such as must-read articles and essays not originally written exclusively for the blawg, and which have come to our attention. Please feel free to email loyarburokker@loyarburok.com if you would like to reproduce your writing, but first follow our Writer's Guide here.

How transformative is our Economic Transformation Programme (ETP), really?

In 8 short weeks, 12 'labs' comprising 30-50 experts each researched, brainstormed, and devised 131 Entry Point Projects (EPPs) across 12 National Key Economic Areas (NKEAs). What impressive numbers!

But an impression of transformation was probably what all those digits delivered. PEMANDU emphasises the private sector participation in these labs, but REFSA posits that cash-strapped start-up companies cannot afford to release staff for two months to attend labs. On the other hand, large establishments would have the manpower to spare, and may even send experienced lobbyists to promote their pet projects.

Thus, PEMANDU's EPP pickings are REFSA's pickle. Start-ups usually have genuinely transformative ideas that revolutionise the status quo, while large companies tend to be less adventurous. If the ETP labs, unwittingly or otherwise, closed out input from the former and only heard voices from the latter, then our economic roadmap is more 'business as usual' than transformative.

Read Part 3(ii) of our Critique of the ETP as REFSA raises brows at the programme's hothouse lab environment.

Click here for an archive of our Focus Papers.

Visit us at http://refsa.org | Like us on our Facebook page | Follow our tweets @inforefsa

Recommended Reads:

LoyarBurok Interview: NH Chan (Part 1)

NST: Pregnant woman wins landmark case

In-FACT-ing Malaysia: REFSA presenting at Pecha Ku...

A Critique of the ETP Part 3(i) - PEMANDU strength...

Tags: , , , , , , ,

REFSA is an independent, not-for-profit research institute providing relevant and reliable information on social, economic and political issues affecting Malaysians with the aim of promoting open and constructive discussions that result in effective policies to address those issues. Visit us at www.refsa.org

Posted on 15 February 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by Research for Social Advancement (REFSA).

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...