Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

When politicians are more interested in business first

One also wonders how on earth can they place rakyat first before self if they have their own profits to worry about, day and night. Should the government of the day not ban all politicians from indulging in business deals and leave business to the business world?

By J. D. Lovrenciear

Indeed one begins to wonder why is it that our Malaysian politicians are getting involved in businesses when they should be in the business of caring for the welfare and well being of the rakyat on a full time basis. Are they not paid a salary with perks to govern?

Almost everyone of the BN politicians are into some kind of business, with many of them involved in multi-million Ringgit schemes. Any wise and seasoned business man or woman - big or small, will not hesitate to tell you that to earn your bucks you have to eat, sleep and walk business. It is a 24/7 job.

Now how on earth do our politicians have the time to be involved in healthy and wise politics serving in the best interest of the rakyat and the nation if they are also into mega-buck businesses?

Besides, one also wonders how on earth can they place rakyat first before self if they have their own profits to worry about, day and night. Should the government of the day not ban all politicians from indulging in business deals and leave business to the business world?

Not in Malaysia. The Tun Dr Mahathir has already not only sowed the seeds through his grand plan of privatization, but has successfully nurtured it into a must-do political culture today. Name one politician in the BN fold who has not made money – not from his frugal savings from the wages but from all kinds of business deals, including wheeler-deals.

This is why the politics of Malaysia is inter-woven so intricately with corruption ranging from patronizing to compromising, from abuse of power to all kinds of coveted and secret approvals. And to provide enough insurance we have the Official Secrets Act to give blanket to all the unknown deals.

Indeed it is sad. It is heart breaking. It is devastating to the very soul of nation-building. When politicians place business as theit right and blank-cheque mandate, we compromise governance. And in that process the rakyat become p! oorer th rough lost and abused opportunities.

In many forward looking nations elsewhere, successful businessmen surrender their business wealth in order to champion citizens' interests and nation building. They bring to the field of governance their enriched knowledge of transforming economies for the people.

In our case, we get into politics to enrich our own families at the expense of the rakyat and the nation. Perhaps the learned and untainted minds of Malaysia should do a through study and publish the truth of how our civil servant-turned-politicians and street smart talkers turned political kingpins have amassed their own and their families wealth through their seeming political leadership.

No small wonder than that there is so much fear in making public the wealth and assets of politicians and so much of feet dragging till this date.

Poor Malaysians. They can only court the self-consolation in the face of that hopelessness of "apa boleh buat; jangi kita dapat sedikit cukup lah itu".

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Negara kebajikan tak undang kegawatan tapi rasuah dan kronisma jadikan Malaysia bankrap...

klang hokkien association najib cny 060212Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak hari ini berkata, negara yang mencuba model negara berkebajikan seperti yang cuba diperkenalkan PAS hanya berakhir dengan kegawatan ekonomi.
 

Najib berkata, dasar BN menyediakan jaringan keselamatan sosial, yang berbeza daripada dasar negara kebajikan yang diamalkan di beberapa negara Eropah.


"Kerajaan mengamalkan dasar sediakan jaringan keselamatan sosial dalam negara.

"Negara kita bukan merupakan negara kebajikan  kerana semua negara yang mengamalkan negara kebajikan akhirnya menghadapi masalah ekonomi amat serius," katanya.- malaysiakini


(Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak today derided PAS' welfare state concept, claiming that countries which have tried this model have ended up with economic turmoil. 

"Government practises the policy of providing social safety net in the country although we are not welfare state because all nations that practise welfare state (concept) eventually face very serious economic problems," he said. - malaysiakini)

Sementara itu,  Setiausaha agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng menegaskan hari ini amalan korupsi dan kapitalis kroni oleh Bari! san Nasi onal (BN) yang akan menjadikan negara ini muflis dan bukannya konsep negara kebajikan yang dibawa Pakatan Rakyat (PR).

Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang ini berkata tiada sebab mengapa Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak ingin menentang negara berkebajikan yang akan membantu semua rakyat Malaysia terutamanya yang miskin, melainkan beliau merasa bimbang untuk segelintir kroni kapitalis yang akan rugi.

"Negara kebajikan yang memastikan bahawa yang miskin dan lemah tidak dipinggirkan tidak akan menjadikan Malaysia muflis. 

Korupsi dan kapitalisme kroni yang akan menjadikan Malaysia muflis .

"Sudah tiba masanya untuk kita membasmi kemiskinan, melaksanakan gaji minima dan mengurangkan beban kewangan golongan 60 peratus bawahan yang mempunyai purata pendapatan isi rumah kurang daripada RM3,000 sebulan dan 40 peratus golongan yang terpaksa hidup dengan kurang daripada RM1,500 sebulan," Lim dalam perutusan khasnya sempena sambutan Thaipusam hari ini.

Tambah Ahli Parlimen Bagan ini lagi, kadar inflasi yang melambung menyukarkan kehidupan rakyat Malaysia dan program-program sosial tidak akan menyaksikan Malaysia kerugian  RM1.077 trilion yang telah dibawa keluar daripada negara kita ekoran kegiatan korup dan kapitalis kroni. 

Unjuran kerugian tersebut berdasarkan jumlah keluaran wang secara haram dari Malaysia antara tahun 2000 hingga 2009 mengikut laporan terbaru Global Financial Integrity.

"Kerugian satu trilion ring! git ini bermakna bahawa 10 tahun pertama dalam abad ke-21 adalah dekad yang telah hilang dek korupsi.

"Tiada tindakan yang telah diambil ke atas skandal RM52 bilion saham Bumiputera  yang sepatutnya diagihkan kepada masyarakat itu yang miskin tetapi telah lenyap begitu sahaja," tambah Lim.

Lim (gambar) turut menjelaskan keadaan sama turut berlaku dalam skandal Perwaja dan kerugian dalam tukaran matawang asing oleh Bank Negara yang berjumlah RM20 bilion.

Tambahnya lagi bukanlah perkara yang pelik apabila  kedudukan Malaysia dalam Indeks Persepsi Rasuah Transparency International telah menjunam ke tahap yang paling teruk selama 60 tahun.

 Menurut Lim, kegagalan BN untuk melaksanakan sistem tender terbuka juga telah mengakibatkan kapitalisme kroni.

"Lebuhraya Pantai Barat yang bernilai RM7.07 bilion dengan tempoh konsesi selama 60 tahun serta keengganan untuk memansuhkan tol Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan dan Jambatan Pulau Pinang walaupun pengendali tol sudahpun mengaut keuntungan lebih daripada 100% ke atas pelaburan modal menunjukkan bagaimana kroni-kroni mendapat untung yang besar," tegasnya.

Jelas beliau, situasi itu telah merugikan hampir seluruh 28 juta orang populasi Malaysia.

"DAP mengucapkan selamat menyambut Hari Thaipusam kepada semua penganut Hindu, DAP berharap bahawa pesanan kebaikan mengatasi kejahatan serta kebijakan dan pengetahuan akan mengukuhkan komitmen kita untuk membanteras korupsi dan kapitalisme kroni," tambah Lim dalam kenyataan tersebut.

Perdana Menteri semalam pada majlis sambutan Chap Goh Mei di Klang berkata negara yang mencuba model negara berkebajikan seperti yang cuba diperkenalkan PAS hanya berakhir dengan kegawatan ekonomi.

Menurut beliau, walaupun Malaysia bukan negara kebajikan namun kerajaan tetap menyedia dan melaksanakan dasar jaringan keselamatan sosial demi kebajikan rakyat, termasuk golongan kurang bernasib baik.

Tambahnya, melalui dasar jaringan keselamatan sosial dan memberi keutamaan kepada kebajikan, sebuah masyarakat yang lebih adil dan lebih seimbang daripada segi perkongsian kekayaan negara akan dapat diwujudkan.- malaysian insider


'Crony capitalism', not welfare state, will bankrupt Malaysia...

Lim Guan Eng today countered Datuk Seri Najib Razak's criticism of Pakatan Rakyat's (PR) welfare state concept by telling the prime minister that it is the Barisan Nasional (BN) government's practice of "corruption and crony capitalism" that will bankrupt Malaysia. 

In his Thaipusam message here today, the Penang chief minister insisted that the implementation of a welfare state was meant to empower the poor and the weak, instead of fattening the pockets of rich cronies.

"There is no reason for Najib to be opposed to a welfare state which will make nearly all Malaysians winners, especially the poor, unless he is concerned about the few capitalistic cronies who will be the real losers," Lim said.

The DAP secretary-general appeared to be responding to Najib's attack on the welfare state concept during a function yesterday when the prime minister claimed it would only lead to "very serious economic problems".

Najib, in pitting his administration against PR's "welfare state", boasted that it is the former that strives to provide a social safety net for Malaysians, to ensure wealth is fairly distributed.

"We are not a welfare state. All countries that practise a welfare state end up facing very serious economic problems," Najib said, in an apparent reference to PAS's "Negara Berkebajikan" concept.

"But we practise a social safety net and give priority to welfare. Then we can create a fair and just society that is balanced in sharing wealth," the BN chief added in his 15-minute speech during the function.

Disputing Najib's claim, Lim today pointed to the staggering flight of illicit monies from public coffers under the present BN administration's system.


Najib said yesterday that the implementation of a welfare state would lead to "very serious economic problems".
He highlighted the latest Global Financial Integrity Report on Malaysia, where it was revealed that a whopping RM1,077 billion of illicit capital had left Malaysia from 2000-2009.

Lim coined the 10-year period "a lost decade of corruption", adding that it was no wonder why Malaysia's ranking in Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index had plummeted recently to its worst-ever spot in history at No.60.

The Bagan MP, who is currently serving his first term as Penang chief minister, also castigated the BN administration for refusing to follow in his government's footsteps by implementing an open tender system for the awarding of contracts as well as compelling all Cabinet ministers to declare their assets in public.

"The refusal of the BN federal government to follow the Penang state government's historical initiative of publicly disclosing the assets of the chief minister and EXCOS, does not lend confidence to BN's commitment to integrity in leadership and public accountability.

"BN has also failed to implement an open tender system resulting in crony capitalism," he said.

As examples, Lim cited reports on plans to build the RM7.07 billion West Coast highway for the longest concession period of 60 years and the government's refusal to abolish toll charges for the North-South Expressway and Penang Bridge.

"Rising inflation has made life more difficult for Malaysians and their children.

"These social programmes (under the welfare state) may cost billions of ringgit but not to the magnitude of the RM1,077 billion of illicit money taken out of the country," he said.- malaysian insider

cheers.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

When politicians are more interested in business first

One also wonders how on earth can they place rakyat first before self if they have their own profits to worry about, day and night. Should the government of the day not ban all politicians from indulging in business deals and leave business to the business world?

By J. D. Lovrenciear

Indeed one begins to wonder why is it that our Malaysian politicians are getting involved in businesses when they should be in the business of caring for the welfare and well being of the rakyat on a full time basis. Are they not paid a salary with perks to govern?

Almost everyone of the BN politicians are into some kind of business, with many of them involved in multi-million Ringgit schemes. Any wise and seasoned business man or woman - big or small, will not hesitate to tell you that to earn your bucks you have to eat, sleep and walk business. It is a 24/7 job.

Now how on earth do our politicians have the time to be involved in healthy and wise politics serving in the best interest of the rakyat and the nation if they are also into mega-buck businesses?

Besides, one also wonders how on earth can they place rakyat first before self if they have their own profits to worry about, day and night. Should the government of the day not ban all politicians from indulging in business deals and leave business to the business world?

Not in Malaysia. The Tun Dr Mahathir has already not only sowed the seeds through his grand plan of privatization, but has successfully nurtured it into a must-do political culture today. Name one politician in the BN fold who has not made money – not from his frugal savings from the wages but from all kinds of business deals, including wheeler-deals.

This is why the politics of Malaysia is inter-woven so intricately with corruption ranging from patronizing to compromising, from abuse of power to all kinds of coveted and secret approvals. And to provide enough insurance we have the Official Secrets Act to give blanket to all the unknown deals.

Indeed it is sad. It is heart breaking. It is devastating to the very soul of nation-building. When politicians place business as theit right and blank-cheque mandate, we compromise governance. And in that process the rakyat become p! oorer th rough lost and abused opportunities.

In many forward looking nations elsewhere, successful businessmen surrender their business wealth in order to champion citizens' interests and nation building. They bring to the field of governance their enriched knowledge of transforming economies for the people.

In our case, we get into politics to enrich our own families at the expense of the rakyat and the nation. Perhaps the learned and untainted minds of Malaysia should do a through study and publish the truth of how our civil servant-turned-politicians and street smart talkers turned political kingpins have amassed their own and their families wealth through their seeming political leadership.

No small wonder than that there is so much fear in making public the wealth and assets of politicians and so much of feet dragging till this date.

Poor Malaysians. They can only court the self-consolation in the face of that hopelessness of "apa boleh buat; jangi kita dapat sedikit cukup lah itu".

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

The road to Malaysia is sometimes paved with grammatical errors — Farish A. Noor

The road to Malaysia is sometimes paved with grammatical errors — Farish A. Noor

FEB 7 — There are times when I can only assume that Malaysians have so much free time on their hands that they don't know what to do with it. Today, as I was marking my students' book reviews, I chanced upon an item on Facebook that caught my attention: A minor kerfuffle had erupted thanks to a naive and well-meaning, though poorly executed, attempt at political correctness and inclusivity. The JKMM Facebook page had announced a Happy Thaipusam, but to Buddhists instead of Hindus. Almost immediately scores of irate Malaysians wrote on the page, accusing the JKMM FB page administrators of being stupid and insensitive.

Now allow me to contribute my two cents' worth here (I'm paid in Singaporean dollars now, so my two cents are worth five sen ok, don't play-play ... )

I find it difficult, if not impossible, to believe that anyone at the offices of the JKMM would deliberately set out to insult Hindus on the page of the JKMM. That would be so insanely counter-productive as to beggar belief. True there might be racists anywhere and everywhere (even in academia) but they seldom use official channels to insult others, what more in such a case where anyone responsible can be tracked down and eventually identified.

I can only assume that this was an unfortunate and embarrassing instance of well-meaning individuals treading on deep water, and perhaps the poor fellow got out of his/her depth in this instance. Look, for heaven's sake, it's not as if the political temperature of the country was not hot enough at this point, can we not put things into context. The statement was, after all, wishing people Happy Thaipusam — though in this case, it was being wished upon the wrong confessional community. At worse, it was an embarrassing thing to do which could be easily rectified with a simple explanation and/or apology.

But this has made me ask myself another related question, about our sensitivities and where they may lie. Recall that in the late 1960s another well-meaning Malay-Muslim politician had himself photographed in a Mandarin costume and his wife in a cheongsam, that was then affixed on a Chinese New Year card and sent out to constituents. It was also a well-intentioned gesture, done presumably in the spirit of goodwill to fellow Malaysians. There was nothing that compelled the Malay politician to dress in Mandarin garb. Heck, there was nothing that compelled him to even wish his Chinese constituents a Happy Chinese New Year.

But as a result of this act, he was condemned by several quarters, including those who accused him of being a 'race traitor' etc etc. (You know the script by now)

It just shows that sometimes people blunder though they mean well. Over the past 10 years, I've grown rather tired and jaded with this country, and fed up with Malaysians who don't want to look at the real geo-strategic and macro economic picture, to see that we are standing on the precipice of a serious economic and political crisis across all of Asia. Perhaps the reaction to the JKMM posting is symptomatic of how Malaysians are now on the edge, or have been pushed to the brink by the pyrotechnics we see in the political discourse of our country. But this is, after all, OUR nation — warts and all, and if some of us blunder, we need to rise above it and place things in context. At the very worse all that can be said about the JKMM posting was that it was misdirected. It was not racist. It was not inflammatory. It was not hate-laced with threats to anyone.

As I grow older and my eyesight fails me, my blunders grow in number, frequency and proportion too. (If you don't believe me, go ask my long-suffering students).

If this was a case of an official making a mistake because of how he was taught (or not taught) about cultural and religious differences in school; then let us deal with something concrete like the teaching of multiculturalism and religious pluralism in our curriculum instead. But for heaven's sake, my fellow Malaysians — (and I don't believe I'm using phrases like this from teen-speak) — do chill out. We have enough demagogues and hate-mongers in our midst, let us deal with some real problems, one nuisance at a time.

* Dr Farish A. Noor is a Senior Fellow at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

The Chairman of the EC Should Stop Misleading the Malaysian Public About the US Overseas Voting ...

MyOversesVote

The Election Commission (EC) Chairman, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof, has recently been roundly criticised by Bersih 2.0 and other civil society groups over his proposal to limit postal voting to overseas Malaysians who pay taxes in Malaysia.

The EC Chairman was reported as saying that the EC would discuss with the Parliamentary Select Committee on Electoral Reform the number of years a Malaysian could not pay tax before being barred from voting by post ("Move to exclude", The Sun Daily, 31 January)

To justify his proposal, the EC Chairman cited the American electoral system, saying that only US taxpayers were allowed to vote. On the back of this statement, the MCA leader, endorsed the proposal to bar overseas Malaysians who do not pay tax from voting in parliamentary or state elections as absent voters.

In responding to the criticisms from Bersih 2.0, MyOverseasVote and even Gerakan, the EC Chairman now claims that he never suggested that only tax-paying Malaysians overseas should be allowed to be postal voters, saying:

I also gave an example of the practice in the United States where postal voters should be taxpayers; but never did I mention that I will propose that only taxpayers are allowed to become postal voters abroad. (Bernama, 5 February)

We find it astonishing that it has taken nearly a week for the EC Chairman to explain himself and to claim that he was misquoted by the media. Whether or not this is true, MyOverseasVote cannot overlook the EC Chairman and the MCA's ignorant and misleading assertions about the American system of overseas voting.

Fact number 1: The United States of America does not operate a "No Tax, No Vote" system. While the USA taxes the overseas income of her citizens, taxation and the right to vote are two completely separate issues. Under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, an American citizen abroad can vote via an absentee ballot in any federal election so long as he/she is a U.S. citizen 18 years or older and is a U.S. citizen residing outside the United States. In 2009, Congress strengthened the rights of these voters by enacting the Military and Overseas Voter Em! powermen t (MOVE) Act. The U.S. Embassy in London has confirmed to MyOverseasVote that the only prerequisites for a U.S. absentee ballot are American citizenship and voting age.

Fact number 2: According to the Constitution of the United States of America, it is illegal to link the payment of taxes to the right to vote. The Twenty-fourth Amendment (ratified in 1964) provides that:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

In an interview with MyOverseasVote, Roland Crim, Director of Americans Citizens Abroad (ACA), which specialises in US Expat Tax issues said :

Since the 1964 ratification by the States of the 24th Amendment, Americans cannot be denied the right to vote on the grounds that they do not pay taxes. American citizens who have lived in the United States register to vote and cast their ballots through the voting Registrar in their last place of residence. A distinguishing feature of American citizenship is that it imposes a requirement to file a tax return declaring to the U.S. government all personal income, both earned or unearned, even for Americans living abroad. In many cases, however, an overseas resident tax filer will not pay anything, because after deductions, and after credit for taxes paid in his country of residence, there is no tax due. A filer for whom no tax is due can nevertheless cast a vote with no problem.

MyOverseasVote strongly condemns the MCA for its support of this proposal to deprive Malaysians who do not pay tax of their voting rights, and congratulates Gerakan for their rejection of this ludicrous proposal. We remind the EC that their duty is to run the election proces! s in a f air and impartial way, and not to try to extinguish the right of all Malaysians to vote, as enshrined in the Federal Constitution.

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Views of a typical citizen on extremism — A minority patriot

FEB 7 — Following on Perkasa's white angpow fiasco with the exposé of Malaysiakini's pro-opposition journalistic agenda, we all have opened our eyes on how some people are trying to makes things right, while enemies will be waiting for their prey to fall so they can take advantage and attack further.

In some cases, it was just plain dumb — "bila curi ayam tinggal tapak kaki pula" — you get my point. Of course, that was not the only case going on recently, but I would not go on to discuss that; I believe we all have been well "entertained" with news about cow's and pig's heads. In conclusion, we have been bombarded with dramas of one against another to the extreme in every aspect almost every day.

My point is the culture of extremism as a result of the clashes between the left and right wings of ideologies and agendas is growing; this is not good at all! Is this the culture that we really want? Can't we all just acknowledge our differences, receive the good and relinquish the bad, live in peace and harmony like our parents did in the past 50 years? Even if there are disagreements in ideologies, we can (should) all sit down and debate like adults. Moreover, that is how people should behave in a democratic society in the first place.

How would our children behave next time when they have now been exposed to things like these? Is this what we really want for our children?

On the other hand, our beloved Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has called for moderation; have we taken notice of that? Why would he organise a platform for everyone to be moderate, and more importantly, reject extremism?

Our future generation will deteriorate further if we are incapable of doing do the right thing. I believe that's not what Malaysia is all about, and hopefully will never be.

* A minority patriot blogs at http://i-am-malaysianlah.blogspot.com. You can follow him on Twitter @malaysianlah.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Shahrizat is Najib’s millstone

By Mariam Mokhtar | Malaysiakini

There was one serious flaw in the success story of Malaya: The emergent Malaysia bred generations of Malay politicians who, when caught with their hands in the public kitty, will do anything to hang on to power.

They continue nonchalantly because they are confident their peers will play along with the charade.

They delight in "proving their innocence" by swearing on the Quran. Some think that by seeking absolution from God, by going on umrahs, they are able to convince the god-fearing public, that the pilgrimage is a testament of their innocence.

The National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) scandal hangs like a millstone around the neck of the Women, Family and Community Development Minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil.

Acting like a wounded animal, she has chosen to belittle Islam, and cast doubt on the intelligence of Malaysians. She has even striven to involve Wanita Umno.

On her return from the umrah, Shahrizat said: "Why have I went [sic] to Mecca three times in two-and-a-half months? Because I'm God-fearing, I ask for guidance from Allah."

Instead of inviting understanding and compassion, Shahrizat only increased our contempt of her. How can Shahrizat spend so much time away from work? What is her ministry's Key Performance Index? How can she waste so much of the taxpayers' money on three trips to Saudi Arabia, in as many months?

Are we to infer that holy visits are a proof of innocence? In times of austerity, how did she stretch her ministerial wage?

Perhaps, the opposition should table a parliamentary motion for all ministers to declare their expenses,! and NOT just their assets.

The fault is not her's entirely. The whole award system lacks transparency. The MACC and the police drag their feet on investigations. The prime minister only pretends to act like one.

The RM250 million of misappropriated public funds swirl around the NFC, whose chairman Mohamed Salleh Ismail is Shahrizat's husband.

Money not disbursed to satellite ranchers

Their children are also implicated and it is alleged that they have business dealings with other ministerial children.

The Auditor-General, Ambrin Buang, has stated that the audit was not on the NFC, as a whole, and that it established that the NFC had failed to meet its target.

The audit was merely to ascertain why money was not disbursed to the satellite ranchers despite being channelled to the ministry/NFC.

In an interview with Rafizi Ramli (left), the PKR strategic director who highlighted the NFC scandal, PKR used the audit report to demand accountability in government funding: "We carried out our own investigation and followed leads provided by whistleblowers.

"The resultant exposés are clear indictments that public funds had been channelled outside NFC to benefit the family of a federal minister."

Rafizi alleged that various companies which had been set up and received NFC funding, were owned wholly by Shahrizat's family. Capital assets of the NFC had no relevance to the cattle industry and targets agreed with the government were not achieved.

Simple questions were asked: "When these businesses don't seem to be making money, who is going to repay the loans?

"Why was this company, owned by a minister's family, chosen as an integrator for this project when they had no experience in the cattle industry and they openly admitted this?

"Why did they transfer money to entities controlled by them and then go on shopping sprees?

"This is a government-funded project, why did they spend exorbitantly when the target! s were n ot met?"

Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin defended the NFC project and rejected opposition demands for a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) to investigate the NFC, because he claimed that current investigations were sufficient.

Rafizi rubbished his comments and said: "The NFC scandal has come to a stage where normal investigation will not be able to unravel the extent of abuse and political interference. That is why Pakatan has stepped up calls for an RCI.

"We started with revelations of financial misappropriation of public funds, but gradually we discovered that the extent was worse than anticipated.

"Lately, there had been clear attempts to cover up the scandal. This suggests that public officials were coerced into making statements favourable to the NFC."

'Shady deals' conducted behind the scene

Asked if the AG had made a U-turn, Rafizi said: "It was unprecedented for the Auditor-General to bow down to political pressure.

"We have also established the modus operandi used to transfer funds to companies or business entities owned by the minister's family."

Rafizi alleged that many shady deals were being conducted behind the scenes, despite Najib's claims that NFC's assets had been frozen.

"There is a frantic move to restructure the groups and transfer assets so as to cover their tracks, in preparation for a media blitz by NFC, later this month.

"So this is no longer an issue about cows. It is about the whole weight of government resources and machinery being bent to save a minister, whose family has clearly misappropriated public funds for purposes not agreed by the government.

"A scandal of this scale requires a far reaching investigation that only an RCI has the power to accomplish."

Supporting calls for investigations into the NFC is DAP's Lim Kit Siang (right) who has urged patriotic Malaysians "to demand in a loud and clear voice an RCI into the NFC scandal".
Rafizi agreed: "Public pressure is paramount to this effort. Najib's administration lives in fear of a public backlash, so they monitor activities on the internet and carry out surveys regularly to gauge the public sentiment."

The PKR strategic director discussed tactics to make the government accede to an RCI.

"To those who are bold enough to participate in a rally, please also organise rallies and get people to participate.

"Letters to online media, mainstream newspapers and government websites will help maintain the pressure.

"Better still, if people interact constantly with the prime minister via twitter to pressure him for an RCI on NFC – he would be pressured one way or another to respond. Comments made at PM's blog and online media do make a lot of difference."

Later this month, Rafizi will team up with Ampang MP Zuraida Kamaruddin, on a nationwide campaign.

"We will sell books and meet the public to explain why an RCI is necessary. As this gathers momentum, we need the public to show up at these roadshows. We hope Najib has no option but to agree to an RCI."

Following the opposition's investigations, Rafizi stressed that several questions had been directed at both Najib and the BN.

"So far no answers have been forthcoming."

----------------------------------------------
MARIAM MOKHTAR is a non-conformist traditionalist from Perak, a bucket chemist and an armchair eco-warrior. In 'real-speak', this translates into that she comes from Ipoh, values change but respects culture, is a petroleum chemist and also an environmental pollution-control scientist.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Shahrizat returning to her first Cabinet meeting tomorrow after her 3-week leave triumphant or chastened?

Is the Minister for Women, Family and Community Development, Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil returning to her first Cabinet meeting tomorrow after her three-week leave triumphant or chastened?

All the signs are that Shahrizat has returned from her three-week leave completely unrepentant about the RM330 million National Feedlot Centre/National Feedlot Corporation (NFC/NFCorpn) "cattle condo" scandal which had plunged the 34-month Najib premiership to the lowest point in terms of public accountability and integrity and threatened to topple Malaysia's Transparency International Corruption (TI) Perception Index (CPI) 2012 next year to a new low in both CPI score and ranking – even lower than the deplorable 60th ranking and 4.3 score in TI CPI 2011.

Shahrizat came back from her leave even more combative and truculent, as if challenging not only her known public detractors but the unseen forces in UMNO and Barisan Nasional to a battle royale to force her to relinquish her positions in both government and party over the NFC scandal – as Cabinet Minister and Umno Wanita chief!

The Cabinet meeting tomorrow will be the national focus tomorrow, whether the Prime Minister and the Ministers dare to state the obvious – that she should extend her leave as the rationale of her three-week leave to allow the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC) to clear her of any corruption, abuse of power or conflict of interests in the "cattle condo" scandal has not yet been achieved – or to be cowed by her triumphant return, although MCA President Datuk Seri Chua Soi Lek had blamed her for the "poor handling" of "cattle condo" scandal, causing the public to perceive the NFC project as "real rotten"?

Shahrizat made a very unrepentant, defiant but eloquent retort in mid-December "Which UMNO leader does not have problem", which probably explained why she felt she was in safe company and enjoyed both immunity and impunity for her role in the "cattle condo" scandal.

Can every Cabinet Minister publicly declare that he or she does not have similar problems as Shahrizat and does not have any next-of-kin, whether husband, wife, son or daughter who have taken massive government loans for whatever projects which were misused for purposes completely unrelated to the loan disbursement – like the purchase of luxury condominiums in Bangsar and Singapore, land in Putrajaya or holidays trips and family expenses when the RM250 million loan was to promote the country's beef self-sufficiency?

The Cabinet tomorrow owes the nation a satisfactory explanation why after nearly four months of public expose or nearly seven months since the first submission of the Auditor-General's Report 2010 which first threw light on the RM330 million "cattle condo" scandal, the Najib premiership is at a complete loss as to how to give a satisfactory accounting on the RM330 million "cattle condo" scandal?

Malaysians are shocked by the Malaysiakini report this afternoon that the MACC had not yet interrogated Shahrizat over the "cattle condo" scandal.

Although the MACC Investigations Director Datuk Mustafar Ali revealed that the "cattle condo" case had been classified under Section 23 of the MACC Act for abuse of power which carries a maximum jail sentence of 20 years, he also admitted that Shahrizat had yet to be called in.

As Shahrizat had announced that she was taking three weeks leave to allow MACC to investigate and clear her name of corruption in the NFC scandal, one would have thought that the first thing she would have done when starting her three-week leave would be to visit the MACC to give a full statement to enable the MACC to clear her name. Why didn't she do it?

And if Shahrizat did not volunteer to give a statement to MACC, why didn't MACC call her up so that it could clear Shahrizat of any corrupt wrongdoing in the NFC scandal?

It would appear that Shahrizat's three-week leave is nothing but a charade.

Malaysians still remember how initially, MACC refused to investigate the "cattle condo" scandal insisting that it was a police matter. It was only as a result of nation-wide outrage that the MACC changed its tack and announced its own investigations.

MACC had seriously undermined its own credibility, integrity and professionalism when it fouled up the Teoh Beng Hock and Sarbaini death cases. It will completely destroy its reputation if it is unable to re-establish its credibility, integrity and professionalism in its investigations of the "cattle condo" scandal.

A former senior police officer, Datuk Mat Zain, who was the former KL city CID chief, had questioned in an open letter to the Inspector-General of Police the police's reluctance to act against Shahrizat's family in the NFC scandal, saying it should only take "hours" to determine if they had misused project funds for their umrah trips.

Mat Zain had also called on the Prime Minister to instruct the police, graftbusters and the Attorney-General to complete investigations into the NFC scandal within a fortnight.

Is there any Cabinet Minister tomorrow who dare to ask Shahrizat to fully clear herself of any wrongdoing, whether abuse of power or conflict of interests, in the NFC scandal before she resumes her duty as Minister for Women, Family and Community Development?

Print Friendly
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Cinta Sekeping Sandwic 2.0 #LoyarBerkasih

Print Friendly

Aku harap semua orang dapat segarkan minda dan baca bahagian pertama dahulu sebelum membaca sambungan kisah cinta sekeping sandwic antara aku dan Sharon Loh.

 

Playground | Credit: Phalinn Ooi

I.

Petang itu tak berapa indah. Panas terik, berpeluh-peluh aku dibuatnya. Dahi aku dibasahi peluh tatkala angin langsung tak bertiup. Ketiak aku usah ditanya, sudah banjir. Hati aku mula meraung bertanya di manakah Leman Jongang, pagi tadi dia janji untuk berjumpa dengan aku di padang ini. Aku tak faham kenapa dia nak jumpa aku di sini dan aku tak faham kenapa aku sanggup duduk di bawah terik mentari membiarkan ketiak aku dirogol peluh. Aku terus berjalan ke arah sebatang pohon yang merimbun tidak jauh dari situ.

Aku tolehkan pandangan ke arah jarum jam di pergelangan tangan, aduh, dah nak masuk Asar! Lepas Asar nanti nak main bola pula. Haih, Leman Jongang memang tak akan faham masalah aku sebab dia bukan kaki bola. Dia lebih ke kaki bangku dan mungkin akan ikut jejak langkah ayahnya yang kaki botol. Selamatlah ayah aku kaki pukul.

II.

Dari jauh sudah kelihatan susuk tubuh Leman Jongang. Walaupun dari pemerhatian aku cuma kelihatan giginya yang bersinar, aku yakin itu Leman kerana di kampung ini hanya dia seorang yang ada keunikan sebegitu. Otak aku terus berfikir tentang perkara yang ingin dibincangkan. Nak dikatakan taktik bola petang ini, tak mungkin. Nak dikatakan taktik mengurat Salmah anak Lebai Sulong, lagi mustahil. Sambil itu pemikiran aku terus terbayang beg baju yang aku belum kemas. PAP! Aku terus tepuk dahi, terlupa pula janji aku pada ibu untuk  mengemas baju dahulu sebelum keluar. Mana tidaknya, esok merupakan hari untuk aku tinggalkan keluarga. Esok ialah hari pertama aku di sekolah menengah dan juga  di asrama. Gembira pula rasa hati sambil-sambil rasa gusar dengan leteran ibu yang menanti.

III.

Susuk tubuh Leman Jongang semakin hampir, mungkin dalam 50 meter lagi. Haih, lembab betul jalan. Macam siput sedut! Aku lepaskan geram, ketiak terus sambung banjir.

Aku teringat macam mana nama Leman boleh diJongangkan. Sebenarnya, Leman bukanlah seorang yang jongang pun. Cumanya dia memang tak mampu untuk berhenti senyum. Biarlah telinganya dipulas cikgu ataupun disuruh tekan tubi oleh pengawas penindas, dia tetap akan senyum. Sehinggakan satu hari Mael kaki buli tak jadi untuk tumbuk mukanya kerana giginya itu.

"Ish, apa hal kau ni? Dari tadi senyum? Tak takut ke? Ke kau jongang?" Aku masih ingat lagi kata-kata separa bangang dari mulut Mael ini sebelum dia tinggalkan saja Leman di belakang kantin tahun lepas. Ini waktu…hmm…erm…malas aku ungkit kisah lama, tapi inilah waktu selepas kali terakhir aku jumpa Sharon. Sehingga sekarang sudah hampir setahun aku tidak menjumpainya. Ah, lupakan! Lupakan!

IV.

Gerak-geri Leman Jongang makin menghampiri, kelihatan dia membawa beg di tangan kanannya. Oh, bukan giginya yang bersinar dari jarak 73 meter itu. Cis, aku bagaikan tertipu dengan ilusi optik! Kelihatan Leman kemas dan segak bergaya, dari sini nampak macam dia memakai kemeja kotak-kotak. Rambutnya pula agak panjang. Wah, bukan main rock lagi Leman sekarang! Aku terus tepuk akar banir, tak puas hati. Rambut aku sudah pendek mengikut spesifikasi asrama. Aik, pendek pula Leman kali ni? Biarlah, tak cukup makan Koko Krunch lah tu. Bisik aku dalam hati.

"Woi, Mangang!" jerit aku dari jarak 17.5 meter sambil melambai tangan. Mangang datang dari Leman campur Jongang. Bangang pun boleh diterima.

"Hai…" jawabnya lembut lantas lutut aku bergetar bagai berjumpa malaikat maut. Rupanya dia bukan Leman!

"Nohorom! Siapa ni? Pula dah..salah orang! Ya Allah, malunya aku! Ya Allah, ampunkanlah segala dosaku sekiranya dia ni seorang pembunuh upahan!" jerit aku dalam hati sambil mata ditutup erat.

Sunyi.

Beberapa saat kemudian aku buka mata semula, perlahan-lahan.

Aku gosok mata.

Aku gosok mata 2.0.

Aku gosok mata 3.0.

Adakah ini benar?

Aku tak percaya.

"A…a…awak…Shh…Sh…Shaver Loh kan?" soal aku gagap.

"Sharon…" jawabnya sambil senyum malu.

"Oh…oh…oh ya ya ya Sharon!" balas aku yang baru tersasul tadi.

Hati aku melonjak gembira. Degupan jantung sudah sepantas dan sepadu tumbukan Sapok Biki. Aku cuak, aku nervous, aku dah tak tahu nak buat apa!

Sharon Loh masih tersenyum di hadapan aku, tenang.

"Saya kena cepat. Nanti mak saya marah," kata Sharon.

"Kenapa?" tanya aku ringkas.

"Saya baru sampai. Kena kemas barang dulu," balasnya semula yang terus membuatkan aku terpinga-pinga, tak faham.

"Erm..hmm..er.." aku sedang fikirkan balasan yang sesuai. Argh! Waktu inilah otak pemidato daerah tak dapat digunakan!

"Tak apa, saya kena balik dah. Esok awak nak masuk asrama kan? All the best tau and belajar betul-betul. Kita jumpa lagi okay? Bye!" dan tidak semena-mena badan aku dirangkul Sharon dan dipeluk erat. Seluruh badan aku kebas secara spontan. Aku tergamam.

V.

Hati aku mula terbayang Leman Jongang yang senyum berseorangan dengan muka penuh konspirasi dan cahaya giginya bersinar sejauh 133 meter.

Aku pandang sampul putih yang diberikan Sharon kepada aku sebelum dia pulang. Aku cium baunya. Hm, pelik. Mungkin bau beg tangan putihnya itu.

"Salam Syamim, maaf kelam kabut sangat. Tahun lepas saya pindah ke bandar secara mengejut, tak sempat beritahu awak. Harap awak tak marahkan saya. Saya harap awak akan cemerlang di asrama nanti. Gunakanlah peluang sebaiknya sebab saya sendiri tak berpeluang melanjutkan pelajaran ke sana. Ayah kata mungkin sebab nama saya. Biarlah, asalkan awak ada di sana sebagai wakil saya. :) Oh, ingat ini?

sandwic | Credit: Mim Jamil

Ha, kalau ingat dan rindu, jemputlah datang ke rumah saya malam ini untuk makan malam bersama keluarga saya, ibu saya jemput. Saya akan buatkan khas untuk awak. Sandwic tuna. <3 xoxo ."

Lantas degupan jantung aku berhenti buat seketika. Aku tergamam. Kali ini aku betul-betul terapung. Lain macam perginya. Aku terus berlari ke rumah dengan dua rancangan di dalam hati buat penutup hari ini.

Pertama, kemaskan barang.

Kedua, pakai baju paling cantik.

Ketiga, ke rumah Sharon.

Keempat, makan sandwic tuna sampai habis dan bawa balik sikit sebagai bekal ke asrama.

Ah, biarlah berapa banyak pun aku nak rancang!

Oh, indahnya dunia!

 

 

Kelima, baring atas katil dan mimpi berkahwin dengan Sharon Loh.

Mim Jamil ialah pencarut sambilan di @mimjamil. Dia selalu ditanya oleh orang ramai terutamanya Mei Yi perihal Sharon Loh. Dia rasa Sharon Loh sekarang sedang sibuk menyiapkan sandwic tuna di dapur sambil mendengar Við Spilum Endalaust dendangan Sigur Rós.

Recommended Reads:

Sedition under the Law of this Country

Internet Service Provider Liability Act: Do we nee...

The Commentables - The Really? News: Can You Spot ...

Ia yang Indah (Part 1) #LoyarBerkasih

Tags: , , , , ,

Kaki lomo dan penulis blog tegar. Kadang-kadang mencarut di @mimjamil.

Posted on 6 February 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by Mim Jamil.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

The Chairman of the EC Should Stop Misleading the Malaysian Public About the US Overseas Voting ...

MyOversesVote

The Election Commission (EC) Chairman, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof, has recently been roundly criticised by Bersih 2.0 and other civil society groups over his proposal to limit postal voting to overseas Malaysians who pay taxes in Malaysia.

The EC Chairman was reported as saying that the EC would discuss with the Parliamentary Select Committee on Electoral Reform the number of years a Malaysian could not pay tax before being barred from voting by post ("Move to exclude", The Sun Daily, 31 January)

To justify his proposal, the EC Chairman cited the American electoral system, saying that only US taxpayers were allowed to vote. On the back of this statement, the MCA leader, endorsed the proposal to bar overseas Malaysians who do not pay tax from voting in parliamentary or state elections as absent voters.

In responding to the criticisms from Bersih 2.0, MyOverseasVote and even Gerakan, the EC Chairman now claims that he never suggested that only tax-paying Malaysians overseas should be allowed to be postal voters, saying:

I also gave an example of the practice in the United States where postal voters should be taxpayers; but never did I mention that I will propose that only taxpayers are allowed to become postal voters abroad. (Bernama, 5 February)

We find it astonishing that it has taken nearly a week for the EC Chairman to explain himself and to claim that he was misquoted by the media. Whether or not this is true, MyOverseasVote cannot overlook the EC Chairman and the MCA's ignorant and misleading assertions about the American system of overseas voting.

Fact number 1: The United States of America does not operate a "No Tax, No Vote" system. While the USA taxes the overseas income of her citizens, taxation and the right to vote are two completely separate issues. Under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, an American citizen abroad can vote via an absentee ballot in any federal election so long as he/she is a U.S. citizen 18 years or older and is a U.S. citizen residing outside the United States. In 2009, Congress strengthened the rights of these voters by enacting the Military and Overseas Voter Em! powermen t (MOVE) Act. The U.S. Embassy in London has confirmed to MyOverseasVote that the only prerequisites for a U.S. absentee ballot are American citizenship and voting age.

Fact number 2: According to the Constitution of the United States of America, it is illegal to link the payment of taxes to the right to vote. The Twenty-fourth Amendment (ratified in 1964) provides that:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

In an interview with MyOverseasVote, Roland Crim, Director of Americans Citizens Abroad (ACA), which specialises in US Expat Tax issues said :

Since the 1964 ratification by the States of the 24th Amendment, Americans cannot be denied the right to vote on the grounds that they do not pay taxes. American citizens who have lived in the United States register to vote and cast their ballots through the voting Registrar in their last place of residence. A distinguishing feature of American citizenship is that it imposes a requirement to file a tax return declaring to the U.S. government all personal income, both earned or unearned, even for Americans living abroad. In many cases, however, an overseas resident tax filer will not pay anything, because after deductions, and after credit for taxes paid in his country of residence, there is no tax due. A filer for whom no tax is due can nevertheless cast a vote with no problem.

MyOverseasVote strongly condemns the MCA for its support of this proposal to deprive Malaysians who do not pay tax of their voting rights, and congratulates Gerakan for their rejection of this ludicrous proposal. We remind the EC that their duty is to run the election proces! s in a f air and impartial way, and not to try to extinguish the right of all Malaysians to vote, as enshrined in the Federal Constitution.

 

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

3 PR leaders accepted Raja Datuk Nong Chik’s debate dare...

NONE Three Pakatan Rakyat MPs, one each from DAP, PKR and PAS, have answered the call for a debate with Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister Raja Nong Chik Zainal Abidin over the use of money from the Employees Provident Fund for a low-cost housing loan scheme.The trio, PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar (right in photo), DAP national publicity secretary Tony Pua (left in photo) and PAS central committee member Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad (below), rose to the minister's challenge through a joint statement.
The English language daily Malay Mail yesterday quoted Raja Nong Chik issuing the call for a "one-to-one public debate".

He was quoted to have asked the three opposition MPs whether "these impoverished people cannot get housing without help. Are they saying that these people do not deserve housing?"


And he added, that the opposition MPs should debate him "one-to-one in front of all the residents".


The three opposition MPs in a joint statement said that Pakatan Rakyat fully supports the noble objective of ensuring affordable housing for low income urban dwellers.


"However, the fulfilment of this aim - home ownership for the urban poor - is the responsibility of the government of the day, and not the responsibility of Malaysian workers.


"Hence, we! are mor e than happy to debate with the minister in the interest of the public to ensure that all relevant issues are thrashed out in an open and transparent fashion.


y4c nep forum 180107 dzulkefly ahmad"In order to ensure that the public receives the full story behind the controversy, the debate must be conducted on a level playing field," the statement added.

"The debate must not only be open to low-cost housing residents in Kuala Lumpur, it should be open to all Malaysians, especially stakeholders who are EPF contributors.

"Preferably, the debate should be televised to ensure that Malaysians who are not able to make it, like contributors from East Malaysia, have the opportunity to listen to both sides of the argument."


Nurul Izzah is a first term Lembah Pantai MP as is Dzulkefly (Kuala Selangor) and Pua (Petaling Jaya Utara).


Need for full disclosure of agreements


In the interest of transparency and accountability, the three opposition lawmakers want Raja Nong Chik, to provide a full disclosure of the agreements made between all the government entities and the EPF.

"Only then all the members of parliament as well as the public can have full information access to debate this issue," the statement added.


NONERaja Nong Chik (left), they pointed out, had in the Malay Mail report even tried to teach ! them wha t is "sub-prime" loan.  Raja Nong Chik said the MPs were mistaken in comparing the housing loans to the sub-prime loans, which he said referred to as inflated loans sold at double the property value.

"Do they even know what sub-prime lending is? These properties are worth double or even triple of what City Hall is asking for," the minister was quoted as saying.


Nurul Izzah, Dzulkefly and Pua said perhaps the minister's attempt to be clever, is asking for a pie in his face.

"The Federal Deposit of Insurance Corporation (FDIC), an independent agency of the United States federal government, clearly refers to "sub-prime" as "the credit characteristics of individual borrowers".


"Sub-prime borrowers typically have weakened credit histories that include payment delinquencies…

 
"They may also display reduced repayment capacity as measured by credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, or other criteria that may encompass borrowers with incomplete credit histories with no mention of  property value.

"What we have here today is that EPF lending money to borrowers who, Raja Nong Chik himself has admitted, will not qualify for loans from commercial banks.

"The fact that the low-cost property value, which the minister claims to be worth double or triple the selling price, has nothing to do with the issue of 'sub-prime'," the joint statement said.


Perhaps, the trio suggested, the minister may want to polish his knowledge of sub-prime credit and lending, before taking on to debate either one of them to save himself from further public embarrassment.-malaysiakini



MP Pakatan terima cabaran debat Raja Nong Chik,Menteri Wilayah...

Anggota parlimen pembangkang hari ini bangun menyahut ajakan debat Menteri Pembangunan Wilayah dan Pembangunan Bandar Datuk Seri Raja Nong Chik Zainal Abidin berhubung isu penggunaan dana Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja (KWSP) bagi membiayai skim perumahan kos rendah.

NONENurul Izzah Anwar (PKR-Lembah Pantai), Tony Pua (DAP-Petaling Jaya Utara) dan Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad (PAS-Kuala Selangor) menyatakan persetujuan itu melalui kenyataan bersama mereka hari ini.

Harian berbahasa Inggeris Malay Mail

Beliau dipetik sebagai bertanya anggota parlimen pembangkang itu sama ada orang miskin tidak layak mendapat rumah tanpa bantuan.
semalam memetik Raja Nong Chik mengajak diadakan debat satu sama satu secara terbuka.
 
Menjawab persoalan itu, ketiga-tiga anggota parlimen Pakatan Rakyat itu berkata mereka menyokong hasrat memastikan golongan miskin bandar memiliki rumah bagaimanapun menegaskan ia menjadi tanggungjawab kerajaan, bukannya golongan pekerja.

"Oleh itu, kami lebih daripada gembira untuk berdebat dengan menteri berkenaan untuk kepentingan awam bagi memast! ikan isu yang relevan dilontarkan dalam suasana yang telus.

"Bagi memastikan orang awam menerima gambaran penuh terhadap kontroversi ini, debat itu mesti dijalankan di padang sama rata," menurut kenyataan itu lagi
.
- malaysiakini

cheers.


Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Air S’gor: Khir Toyo khianati amanah

PETALING JAYA: Kenyataan mantan Menteri Besar, Dr Khir Koyo bahawa beliau tidak terlibat dalam penyerahan konsesi air kepada Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (Syabas) membuktikan beliau sebenarnya tidak layak dan gagal selaku Menteri Besar Selangor.

"Sesungguhnya (bekas perdana menteri) Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad yang memilih Khir turut bertanggungjawab di atas kegagalan ini," kata Setiausaha Politik kepada Menteri Besar Selangor Faekah Husin dalam satu kenyataan media.

Faekah berkata, sungguh memeranjatkan apabila seorang pemimpin yang diberi tanggungjawab menjaga kepentingan rakyat tiba-tiba menuding jari ke arah orang lain bagi melepaskan dirinya yang kini dianggap sebagai kera sumbang oleh partinya sendiri.

"Kenyataan dan penafian Khir seolah-olah mahu membalas dendam kepada Umno yang tidak mahu melindungi kesalahan beliau hingga tertuduh di mahkamah, sedangkan Umno sentiasa melindungi pemimpin mereka yang melakukan kesalahan pecah amanah dan rasuah.

"Khir kecewa perkara yang sama tidak dilakukan ke atasnya sebagaimana keistimewaan yang diperolehi (Menteri Pembangunan Wanita Kebajikan dan Masyarakat dan juga Ketua Wanita Umno) Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil dalam skandal lembu NFC," jelas beliau.

Katanya, sebagai bekas pemimpin nombor satu di negeri Selangor, Khir sepatutnya mengambil tanggungjawab penuh atas kegagalan Syabas menguruskan perkhidmatan pembekalan air dengan baik seperti yang dipersetujui dalam perjanjian bersama.

"Khir terlupa perjanjian yang ditandatangani pada 2004 adalah perjanjian tiga pihak dan Kerajaan Negeri turut terlibat dalam perjanjian tersebut bersama Kerajaan Pusat dan Puncak Niaga selaku syarikat induk kepada Syabas.

"Khir tidak boleh menafikan hakikat bahawa Puncak Niaga mempunyai kaitan rapat dengan Umno kerana (Pengerusi Syabas) Tan Sri Rozali Ismail merupakan Bendahari Umno Selangor ketika itu," terang beliau.

Faekah menerangkan bahawa Syabas gagal mematuhi terma-terma perjanjian khususnya dalam meningkatkan mutu perkhidmatan bekalan air bersih kepada pengguna di Lembah Klang termasuk gagal mengurangkan peratusan air tidak berhasil (NRW) tetapi kerajaan negeri ketika itu di bawah pimpinan Khir gagal bertindak sewajarnya.

"Adakah Khir mahu mengatakan bahawa beliau tidakpun membaca isi kandungan perjanjian tersebut? Adakah Khir mahu mengakui bahawa beliau tidak ada pengetahuan bahawa di dalam perjanjian tersebut bahawa Syabas boleh menaikkan tarif air sehingga 71% pada tahun 2020?

Syabas syarikat kroni Umno

"Selaku MB tidakkah Khir tahu bahawa selama ini Syabas menggunakan aset air rakyat Selangor bernilai RM12 bilion secara percuma?," soal beliau.

Di bawah pimpinan Barisan Nasional (BN), masalah-masalah perkhidmatan air yang gagal ditangani Syabas amat jarang sekali diberi tumpuan biarpun rungutan serta aduan pengguna diterima setiap hari tetapi tidak endahkan hanya kerana Syabas adalah syarikat kroni Umno.

Ujar beliau, "hal ini membuktikan kegagalan penswastaan. Meskipun penswastaan asalnya untuk memberikan khidmat terbaik kepada rakyat dengan sedikit tanggungan kepada kerajaan negeri namun apabila penswastaan dikhianati dengan memberi kontrak kepada kroni dan syarikat yang tiada kepakaran maka inilah akibatnya. Rakyat terpaksa menanggung beban yang tinggi."

Katanya, Khir tidak perlu berlagak naïf kerana di bawah pentadbirannya, memberi kontrak kepada syarikat-syarikat kroni telah menjadi budaya dan kemestian; matlamatnya satu – untuk mengkayakan kaum kerabat dan sahabat handai bagi kesinambungan parti kononnya.

"Khir tidak boleh menafikan, ketika zaman kegemilangannya sebagai Menteri Besar beliau telah memberikan kontrak-kontrak kepada syarikat yang berkait rapat dengan dirinya antaranya syarikat Lebar Daun Sdn Bhd (Lebar Daun).

"Lebar Daun ialah sebuah syarikat pembangunan hartanah yang kaya raya hasil pemberian kontrak secara terus, perjanjian usahasama dengan syarikat kerajaan negeri yang berat sebelah serta penganugerahan tanah berlokasi strategik."

Hutang Unisel ratusan juta

Menurutnya, kontrak pembinaan asrama Universiti Selangor (Unisel) di Bestari Jaya adalah contoh nyata hinggakan Unisel berhutang ratusan juta yang terpaksa ditanggung kerajaan hari ini.

"Lebih malang lagi, sehingga hari ini asrama tersebut masih mempunyai kecacatan akibat dari mutu binaan yang jelek dan tidak mengikut spesifikasi selamat," jelas beliau.

Katanya lagi, di bawah pentadbiran Khir yang merupakan Menteri Besar hasil produk Tun Dr Mahathir, banyak projek perumahan kos rendah terbengkalai kerana syarikat yang mendapat kontrak ini gagal menyiapkan projek dan telah menghilangkan diri.

"Atas nama pembangunan banyak tanah peneroka diserahkan kepada syarikat yang kebanyakannya adalah milik kroni Umno-BN sedangkan hakikatnya tiada pengalaman dalam projek pembinaan.

"Akibatnya tanah-tanah tersebut tergadai kepada bank. Bukan sahaja peneroka kehilangan tanah, malah pembeli juga terpaksa menanggung hutang dan ramai di antara mereka telah diisytiharkan muflis," terangnya.

Namun begitu katanya, beberapa projek sekadar contoh termasuklah projek Alam Perdana di Kuala Selangor, projek Bukit Botak di Selayang, Kampung Berembang di Ampang dan projek perumahan di PJS1 yang kesemuanya berjaya diselesaikan Kerajaan Negeri Pakatan Rakyat.

"Khir telah mengangkat tangan kononnya serik menjadi MB Selangor dan tidak mahu bertanding di dalam PRU yang akan datang.

"Namun rakyat Selangor khususnya dan Malaysia amnya masih menunggu apakah kesudahan kes Khir Toyo menggunakan dana Kerajaan Negeri untuk bercuti bersama keluarga termasuk orang gaji ke Disneyland yang masih dalam siasatan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM).

Mungkin menjadi amalan di dalam UMNO, tindakan hanya dikenakan ke atas seteru politik dan tindakan Khir menganggkat tangan adalah sebagai tanda tidak akan melawan lagi.

"Namun bagi pembayar cukai dan seluruh rakyat Selangor, Khir harus bertanggungjawab ke atas dosanya yang mengkhianati amanah yang diberikan," ujar Faekah.

FMT pada 5 Februari lalu, melaporkan kenyataan Khir yang menafikan bahawa beliau menyerahkan pengurusan air Selangor kepada Syabas tetapi  sebaliknya beliau menyerahkannya kepada kerajaan pusat.

"Kerajaan Pusat yang memberikan kontrak 30 tahun kepada Puncak Niaga Sdn Bhd yang kemudiannya melantik Syabas untuk menguruskannya.

"Saya tidak terbabit kerana Unit Perancang Ekonomi (EPU) yang  memberikan kepada Puncak Niaga," katanya ketika ditemui di pejabatnya di Glenmarie.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

The Chairman of the EC Should Stop Misleading the Malaysian Public

Print Friendly

In our Selected Exhortations category, we republish interesting stuff such as must-read articles and essays not originally written exclusively for the blawg, and which have come to our attention. Please feel free to email loyarburokker@loyarburok.com if you would like to reproduce your writing, but first follow our Writer's Guide here.

This post was published by MyOverseasVote.

The Election Commission (EC) Chairman, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof, has recently been roundly criticised by Bersih 2.0 and other civil society groups over his proposal to limit postal voting to overseas Malaysians who pay taxes in Malaysia.

The EC Chairman was reported as saying that the EC would discuss with the Parliamentary Select Committee on Electoral Reform the number of years a Malaysian could not pay tax before being barred from voting by post ("Move to exclude", The Sun Daily, 31 January)

To justify his proposal, the EC Chairman cited the American electoral system, saying that only US taxpayers were allowed to vote. On the back of this statement, the MCA leader, endorsed the proposal to bar overseas Malaysians who do not pay tax from voting in parliamentary or state elections as absent voters.

In responding to the criticisms from Bersih 2.0, MyOverseasVote and even Gerakan, the EC Chairman now claims that he never suggested that only tax-paying Malaysians overseas should be allowed to be postal voters, saying:

I also gave an example of the practice in the United States where postal voters should be taxpayers; but never did I mention that I will propose that only taxpayers are allowed to become postal voters abroad. (Bernama, 5 February)

We find it astonishing that it has taken nearly a week for the EC Chairman to explain himself and to claim that he was misquoted by the media. Whether or not this is true, MyOverseasVote cannot overlook the EC Chairman and the MCA's ignorant and misleading assertions about the American system of overseas voting.

Fact number 1: The United States of America does not operate a "No Tax, No Vote" system. While the USA taxes the overseas income of her citizens, taxation and the right to vote are two completely separate issues. Under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, an American citizen abroad can vote via an absentee ballot in any federal election so long as he/she is a U.S. citizen 18 years or older and is a U.S. citizen residing outside the United States. In 2009, Congress strengthened the rights of these voters by enacting the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act. The U.S. Embassy in London has confirmed to MyOverseasVote that the only prerequisites for a U.S. absentee ballot are American citizenship and voting age.

Fact number 2: According to the Constitution of the United States of America, it is illegal to link the payment of taxes to the right to vote. The Twenty-fourth Amendment (ratified in 1964) provides that:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

In an interview with MyOverseasVote, Roland Crim, Director of Americans Citizens Abroad (ACA), which specialises in US Expat Tax issues said:

Since the 1964 ratification by the States of the 24th Amendment, Americans cannot be denied the right to vote on the grounds that they do not pay taxes. American citizens who have lived in the United States register to vote and cast their ballots through the voting Registrar in their last place of residence. A distinguishing feature of American citizenship is that it imposes a requirement to file a tax return declaring to the U.S. government all personal income, both earned or unearned, even for Americans living abroad. In many cases, however, an overseas resident tax filer will not pay anything, because after deductions, and after credit for taxes paid in his country of residence, there is no tax due. A filer for whom no tax is due can nevertheless cast a vote with no problem.

MyOverseasVote strongly condemns the MCA for its support of this proposal to deprive Malaysians who do not pay tax of their voting rights, and congratulates Gerakan for their rejection of this ludicrous proposal. We remind the EC that their duty is to run the election process in a fair and impartial way, and not to try to extinguish the right of all Malaysians to vote, as enshrined in the Federal Constitution.

Recommended Reads:

Kewarganegaraan: Antara retorik dan realiti Perlem...

Chin Peng go home (like "ET go home")

Underground Report: What Is The "Third Force&...

The Teoh Beng Hock RCI: A Sham That Deceived Malay...

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The collective persona of Lord Bobo's minions (yes, all the cheeky monkeys and monkettes). Haven't you heard? LoyarBurokking is a lifestyle. Join us, and your life will never be the same again. Because it's fun.

Posted on 7 February 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by LoyarBurokkers.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Welfare Department blasted for Thaipusam gaffe

PETALING JAYA: It is now the Social Welfare Department's (JKMM) turn to become the object of ridicule among Malaysians following a cultural gaffe on its Facebook page.

The department's Facebook status message yesterday read "Selamat Menyambut Thaipusam kpd mereka beragama Buddha" (HappyThaipusam to those who are Buddhists).

Thaipusam is celebrated by Hindus while Buddhists celebrate Wesak. The JKMM's Facebook administrator realised the mistake and updated the status message to "Selamat Menyambut Thaipusam" (Happy Thaipusam) fifteen minutes later.

However the previous message was not removed leading to a flurry of indignant and incredulous comments from the public.

The department was slammed as "stupid", "ignorant", "an embarrassment" and "insensitive" with a number of commenters calling for an apology and a removal of the offending message.

"More than 50 years of independence and this is the sort of rubbish we get from a totally wasted and incompetent government," wrote Krish Kumar.

"Perhaps (JKMM) needs to go back to school and learn which religious celebrations belong to which religion…this is seriously a disgusting display of ignorance," said Suzanne Lazaroo.

"Ni bukan kata bodoh tapi jahil…JKM patut membuat permohonan maaf secara terbuka akibat kesilapan ni (This isn't stupidity but ignorance…JKM should issue an open apology for this mistake)," stated Azhar Aris.

A few commenters also predicted that JKMM would follow in the footsteps of the Defence Ministry in blaming the mistake on "bad translation".

The Defence Minstry recently found itself the laughing stock of Malaysians for blunders on its English site and pointed its finger at Google Translate.

JKMM's faux pas comes just days after Putrajaya member of parliament, Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor, apologised for the Tamil translation and spelling errors on Thaipusam banners placed around the constituency.

The banners were taken down a day later.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Ubah is on Blackberry!

ubah.my


Add Ubah to BBM (pin: 216F89DC) to receive updates directly from your
BlackBerry as the 13th General Election approaches.

Add Ubah to BBM and recommend to your other friends today! Ubah is waiting…
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Umno’s right turn — Liew Chin Tong

FEB 7 — As I walked from my hotel room to a meeting in Port Dickson in July 2005, I remember holding a newspaper with a photo of Hishammuddin Hussein brandishing a keris on its cover. At that moment, I knew Umno was kissing goodbye to its non-Malay support. (For reference, see the first part of this article here.)

Indeed, on hindsight, it was the pivotal moment of the decade: Umno had turned to the right permanently while the then-Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi lost control over his reform agenda. The demise of Abdullah's premiership, arguably Umno's last chance to reform, began in July 2005.

Today, unless Prime Minister Najib Razak can stare down the right wing of his party as effectively as Dr Mahathir Mohamad's Vision 2020 grand compromise and turn the clock back by seven years to restore its centrist credential, the events of July 2005 will culminate in Umno and Barisan Nasional's eventual electoral collapse.

As a reminder to Najib, his great leader Mahathir painfully discovered in the 1990 general election that the 1970s assumption that Umno could win 70 per cent of Malay support was no longer tenable. Malays in general have received better education and exposure, hence they have become more politically sophisticated.

The high rate of urbanisation among the Malays also pulls the rug from under the feet of Umno, the rural machinery party par excellent.

Umno's Malay base has been further eroded by the ever-ready availability of popular alternative Malay leadership in the forms of a revived PAS and Semangat 46 in the 1990s and Anwar Ibrahim since his sacking in 1998.

It was the non-Malay middle class which Mahathir won over through his Vision 2020 grand compromise that sustained Umno and BN in power from February 1991 to July 2005.

But why was Umno so foolishly turning right at its general assembly in July 2005?

The reasons why

After having been in power for 21 months since October 31, 2003, the novelty factor of the Abdullah premiership waned and his leadership weaknesses became too glaring.

Abdullah's all-talk-no-show attributes didn't help. Making it worse, from the point of view of the Umnoputra rentiers, were the subjects he chose to talk about.

Abdullah fired his first policy salvo in the "First-world Infrastructure, Third-world Mentality" speech at the Oxbridge Society in March 2003 when he was acting prime minister during Mahathir's two-month absence, foreshadowing his key priorities, among others, doing away with the government-driven construction craze, paring down fiscal deficits, and the anti-corruption drive.

As prime minister, Abdullah cancelled several of Mahathir's pet projects and put most spending commitments under review. The gravy train for many suddenly stopped. It doesn't help that some of the projects were allegedly revived with the intervention of "the Fourth Floor boys" — the office of Abdullah's young advisers in Putrajaya.

"The hardest thing I've had to do as prime minister so far is to reduce the budget deficit," he said at the first anniversary of his premiership.

Abdullah told the audience at the Harvard Club on May 5, 2005 that "the economy has been used for government pump-priming since 1998 and so the decision to reduce the budget deficit was, for many, like taking away a comforting source of income".

He was aware that, for the rentier class, there was a "general feeling that things are not moving as fast as they were before" while those who wanted to see genuine reform were "growing impatient to see various things happen".

Abdullah asked for patience. "I am committed to seeing through my policies, strategies and promises to fruition. I am not only a man of intentions, I am also a man of deeds. I am not one for display or fanfare or harsh words, so perhaps I don't give away many signs, but that is an issue of style, not substance."

Mahathir's attacks

One of those who lost their patience with Abdullah was Mahathir. Rumours of Mahathir airing his frustration privately were quite widespread from the second half of 2004, especially after the release of Anwar Ibrahim on September 2, 2004.

But Mahathir only launched his public attack on the Abdullah administration in late May 2005 by training his gun on his former loyalist Rafidah Aziz over the issue of approved permits (AP) for imported cars. The issue dominated the public domain for months.

Mahathir became the focal point of dissent among Umno rentiers while Abdullah's reformist credential was tainted, finding himself between a rock and a hard place. Mahathir crossed the line to attack Abdullah personally a year later.

At the same time, there was a lot of hype surrounding the Ninth Malaysia Plan, which would be released in the following year. Abdullah was more or less postponing all decisions in the name of the plan. The rentier class was eager to have a slice of the pie and thus was eager to use the Umno general assembly to make a point.

Abdullah's presidential speech on Thursday, July 21, 2005 continued his line of thought since 2003 that "the government cannot play the role of Santa Claus, perpetually handing out gifts. Contractors should have taken this as a signal to diversify to other sectors".

According to Abdullah, "in 1992, there were only 2,049 Bumiputera contractors. By 2005, the figure had reached 46,000 — an increase exceeding 2,000 (two thousand) per cent in 13 years. Of these, more than 42,000 were registered as Class F contractors.

"Almost all these contractors expected government contracts. There are 63,000 contractors of all classes in a nation of 25 million. This equals to one contractor for every 350 Malaysians. In comparison, Japan, whose contractors participate successfully in international tenders, has a ratio of only one contractor to 10,000."

It was too late. No one in Umno was interested in Abdullah's edicts and those outside the party had lost faith in Abdullah's reform agenda.

Hishammuddin and his keris

A day earlier at the Umno Youth assembly, Hishammuddin Hussein unwittingly stole the limelight with his keris. Being an English-educated elitist, Hisham is always under pressure to show off his Malay credentials. And being called pondan (sissy) by his PAS counterpart probably drove him to use the language of threats and violence.

Hisham's brandishing of the keris was packaged with a "Malay agenda" and the call to revive the New Economic Policy (1970-1990), which Mahathir toned down with the National Development Policy (1991-2000) and the National Vision Policy (2001 onwards).

By then Abdullah's voice had all but disappeared. Everyone at the July 2005 Umno general assembly sang the racial tune as if it was in Umno's glory days of the 1970s. It was a downhill spiral for Abdullah, his agenda and his grip over the party.

Looking back, the private meeting in Port Dickson which I attended turned out to be an important one which I will write about it in the final instalment of this article next week. — The Rocket

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...