Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

The case for academic freedom — Zaid Ibrahim

JAN 17 — I've heard that section 15 of the Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA) will be amended soon to allow students to participate in political activities. We do not need to get excited about this development because students have always been allowed to participate in political activities — so long as they are organised or backed by the Barisan Nasional. At any rate, casting a vote during an election is a political act and this can be done if you are a registered voter, regardless of what the UUCA says.

What student groups and social activists should ask from the BN government is the repeal of section 8 of the UUCA, which would take away the ministerial power to appoint key decision-makers at institutions of higher learning, like the vice-chancellor, his deputy and even the branch campus head. Under the present arrangement the minister appoints almost all key officers of a university, and his appointees then appoint other lesser appointees. This means the entire set-up of a university, including its finance and administration, is held under the minister's tight control.

That makes the minister more powerful than a mentri besar. Let's look at it in terms of money alone: if a public university has, for example, an average annual budget of RM600 million (and we have 20 public universities at the moment), then the minister has control of over RM12 billion in funds. Which mentri besar has that much in his state coffers?

But the damage wrought by our present system of political patronage and control goes beyond financial losses. The quality of our higher education suffers. The best educators are unable to achieve top positions in universities unless they are affiliated politically. Good academics are not normally adept at adhering to the whims of politicians or kissing their hands. Unfortunately, a politician's highest priority is to appoint his supporters and those who will follow his instructions.

I recall during my Umno days how these academics would never fail to do whatever the minister wished them to, just so they could be assured of an extension of their contracts or a promotion. It's pathetic to see how mediocre officials can reach high positions while the truly qualified ones stay below the radar. Our young students then suffer irreparable damage because our top university faculty members are academics who serve as part-time party cadres.

What we need is academic freedom. Let the universities be run by professionals and academics. What does a minister know about education anyway, unless he is an academic himself? Let the university senate decide on major academic matters and other important issues that affect the university, including promotions and what educational programmes to offer. Curriculum and research should be dealt with by the senate together with the respective school deans.

We need capable faculty members if we want a university to flourish. Let there be seats for students and administrative staff as well. This is how we can energise and bring our universities to life. We need to nurture our young talents and this can only be done in an environment of academic and social freedom. Today's stifling and obnoxious politics have been allowed to penetrate university campuses, which is why we see low-grade students and teachers and aggressive behaviour amongst students and faculty members, even on simple issues of peaceful assembly and having public forums.

* Datuk Zaid Ibrahim is president of Parti Kita.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Hak merayu — Mahathir Mohamad

17 JAN — Dalam sejarah kehakiman di Malaysia, Anwar menang pertandingan membuat "appeal" atau rayuan terhadap keputusan mahkamah yang dikenakan kepadanya.

Selama empat tahun kita tidak dengar lain selain daripada appeal Anwar terhadap keputusan mahkamah berkenaan dirinya dalam kes Saiful.

Awal-awal lagi dituntut supaya hakim ditukar kerana kononnya berat sebelah. Dengan itu perbicaraan ditangguh sementara tuntutannya ditimbang oleh mahkamah. Masa berbulan-bulan berlalu kerana mahkamah terpaksa menentukan tarikh untuk mendengar rayuannya.

Setelah diputus yang hakim berkenaan boleh dengar rayuannya, ada lagi rayuan yang dikemukakan.

Jika keputusan yang dibuat baru-baru ini mendapati Anwar bersalah, percayalah ia akan membuat appeal kepada Mahkamah Rayuan (Appeal Court).

Jika Appeal Court bersetuju dengan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi, maka Anwar akan rayu kepada Federal Court.

Jika Federal Court mengesahkan keputusan oleh High Court dan Appeal Court, maka Anwar akan tuntut untuk kesnya dibawa kepada Special Court.

Tetapi apabila Anwar didapati tidak bersalah kerana tidak ada corroborating evidence, hak mangsanya untuk membuat rayuan dipertikaikan.

Apakah dalam negara ini pembesar pembangkang mempunyai hak istimewa bahawa keadilan hanya berlaku apabila ia didapati tidak bersalah?

Apakah dalam negara ini mangsa yang kerdil tidak berhak kepada keadilan sehingga dia tidak boleh merayu untuk didengar oleh mahkamah yang lebih tinggi?

Apakah di negara ini keengganan pembesar pembangkang mengangkat sumpah bukan sahaja di masjid dengan menjunjung Al Quran tetapi semasa dibicara dalam mahkamah biasa tidak mempunyai apa-apa makna terutama kepada orang Islam, dan sumpah laknat oleh si kerdil juga tidak boleh diambilkira?

Atau apakah menjadi satu daripada perjuangan Pakatan bahawa apa yang disarankan oleh Anwar dalam BBC bahawa undang-undang negara ini sudah lapok dan perlu ditukar kepada kebebasan untuk meliwat mengikut liberalisme Barat? — http://chedet.cc

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Paying the price for shunning farming

PETALING JAYA: Malaysia's impending food crisis could have been avoided if it had not cut off its farming arm years ago, a food expert claimed.

Former Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) professor Mohd Peter Davis said the government, prior to the 1997 economic crisis, took its eye off agriculture and focused wholly on other industries.

This, he alleged, caused the country's food security to suffer.

"We never really recovered from where we were (left off). If we carried on (with our agricultural programmes), we could have been virtually self-sufficient in cattle and milk," he told FMT in an interivew.

According to Mohd Peter, many agricultural-based academics suddenly had their research grants taken away from them without warning.

"During that time, I was doing research on intensive sheep production…We had sheep inside sheds, feeding them new diets. This was quite successful, and we were producing four-month-old lambs for the market. They're very delicious for that age."

"We were just about to move up into… big industrial shed and set the standard for the whole country. At that stage, Malaysia closed down all its agricultural research," he said.

As a result, many farming academics had to close shop. Mohd Peter said he had to jump into housing, just to keep himself employed.

In a previous report, Mohd Peter warned that the country was on the brink of a food disaster, especially with a global economic meltdown on the horizon.

This was backed by the World Bank's Malaysia Economic Monitor (Smart Cities) report, which said that the country's self-sufficiency in rice shrunk to 62 percent in 2007 from 71 percent in 1970.

Additionally, the country had to rely on imported food to feed its people.

Technological advancements

Kota Belud MP (Umno) Abdul Rahman Dahlan previously said that former Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad seemed to favour industrialisation over agriculture; a trend that was not reversed until much later.

A worldwide economic crisis would put Malaysia's food situation in jeopardy, Mohd Peter claimed, forcing many of its citizens to go hungry.

According to the former UPM don, the country also suffered from poor food production, especially where livestock was concerned.

"For over 500 years, Malaya has been trying to produce its animals the European way, which was putting them out to graze. But the environment here is too harsh, and the grass is not good, so the native cows (ended up) no good," he said.

He cited technological advancements in farming, such as air-cooled animal sheds, which could multiply livestock production to feed Malaysians and cut back on food imports at the same time.

As an example, Mohd Peter said that an associate of his had recently set up a five-acre farm consisting of 100 Jersey cows from Australia, costing RM3.5 million.

The move, he said, was profitable. Mohd Peter claimed that each cow there could be milked for 14 litres a day, with a return-on-investment (ROI) after less than four years.

With this in mind, he claimed that Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Ministry did not know what it was doing.

"They don't run any farms," he said, referring to the ministry. "Food is produced by entrepreneurs, not the government. They don't produce anything, all they do is block (efforts)… They're not involved in food production."

"If they gave them setup grants to do this (use high-tech farming methods), it would solve all our problems. These people think they know it all, and they just block any innovations coming in," he said.

The controversial National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) was one of the government's attempts in boosting livestock production in the country.

However, the project has since fallen into scandal, with allegations of mismanagement and incompetence surrounding it.

Also read:

Food crisis looming

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

ALAHAI HASAN AKIDAH!!!

Hasan Ali Sudah Gelabah

Antara Parasit Dengan Pelesit Mana Yang Bahaya?

Semalam Hasan Ali (Ahsan Akidah) cuba mencari modal dan idea baru untuk menghalalkan tindakan dia menyerang istananya (Pas) selepas dia dihalau dari istana indahnya itu. Sudah nampak semakin jelas Ahsan sudah mulai gelabah dan merasa sepi dengan kehidupan baru - tidak menjadi ahli Pas dan bakal kehilangan jawatan Exco. Pendampingannya dengan tokoh-tokoh Umno mungkin tidak membawa sinar begitu cerah. Beliau terus berbelit dalam pukat basah Umno.

Kalau sebelum ini dia beriya-iya dan mendabik dada mengatakan dia bertindak untuk mempertahankan akidah, untuk membela akidah, untuk mengharmoniskan akidah, untuk mengembalikan akidah kepada akidah sebenarnya, kini nadanya sudah berubah dan bergetar-getar. Semacam ada selumbar dalam halkumnya.

Bekas pesuruhjaya Pas Selangor itu mula menjadikan soal peribadi dengan individu-individu tertentu sebagai senjata untuk mempertahankan dirinya. Kenapa?


Idea dan modal baru digunakan Hasan ialah menyalahkan Anwar Ibrahim. Beliau meletakkan Anwar sebagai penyebab kegelunsuran dirinya dari wadah Pas. Menghanyutkan dan menjauhkannya dari kerusi MB. Boleh jadi peluangnya untuk jadi MB Selangor masih terbuka kalau dia tetap bersama Pas.

Dalam modal baru itu, katanya dia tidak suka Pas kerana Pas menyokong Anwar, alasannya kerana memperjuangnya membenarkan gay? Dari mana sumber dan perawi yang beliau dapat untuk mengecapkan Anwar begitu, tidak pasti. Apakah dari Ismail Mina? Tetapi kawan baik Anwar berjubah lusuh itu bukan mempersoalkan soal gay tetapi soal Islam plural.

Menghairankan kenapa Anwar yang menjadi sasaran? Apakah Anwar yang memperalatkan Pas dan bertindak membuangnya dari Pas. Naif sekali politik dan bacaan siasah Hasan Akidah ini. Masakan Abdul Hadi Awang dan Naib-Naib presiden Pas termasuk juga Mursyidul Am Pas dan timbalannya Dr Haron Din bersubahat sama dengan Anwar? Begitu sekalikah rangupnya teras pejuangan mereka dan seolah-olah Hasan seorang yang berprinsip?

Mungkin orang boleh menerima akan keterbukaan dan keikhlasan Hasan dalam memperjuangkan akidah dan juga mengkritik mana-mana pemimpin yang tidak betul ataupun yang tidak obses kepada Islam.

Tetapi bila Hasan diam membisu terhadap penyelewengan dan salah akidah dilakukan para pemimpin Umno orang boleh membuat tafsiran lain. Orang jadi konfius tentang kejujurannya. Apakah Hasan sebenarnya yang menjadi talibarut kepada Umno yang bertindak hendak mensucikan Pas? Saya masih ingat kata Nik Aziz mengikut hukum syarak air kencing tidak boleh digunakan untuk membersih najis. Umno bukan wadah yang boleh mensucikan Pas sebaliknya Pasboleh menyamakkan Umno. Sepatutnya sebagai seorang anak yang dididik dengan Islam sejak kecil yang dilahirkan dari kedua ibu bapa yang tahu membaca Quran , Hasan tahu menilai ini.

Saya persoalkan ini kerana tidak ada kritikan dan teguran Hasan terhadap akidah projek lembu gemuk (NFC). Tidak ada teguran dan kritikan Hasan terhadap akidah 1 Malaysia dan ucap selamat 1 Malaysia. Tidak ada kritikan Hasan terhadap akidah rasuah berjuta ringgit dalam pembelian kelengkapan perang negara.

Begitu juga tidak kedengaran saranan lunak Hasan kepada kerajaan UBN supaya menggubal undang-undang murtad bagi menyelamatkan akidah umat Islam yang didakwa kini berada dalam situasi parah kerana kegiatan Kristinisasi. Kenapa?

Kalau Hasan ikhlas untuk membela akidah umat Islam itu dulu yang Hasan kena lakukan. Hasan sendiri kena mengambil inisiatif menganjurkan seminar, konvensyen dan sebagainya ke arah mencari sokongan untuk penggubalan undang-undang murtad atau sebagainya. Dengan kedudukannya sebagai Exco agama Hasan boleh cuba membawanya dalam Dun Selangor. Sama ada ia diterima atau tidak, Hasan perlu mencubanya sebagai menandakan komitmennya.

Tetapi selama memegang jawatan Exco yang bertanggungjawab selama tiga tahun apakah Hasan berusaha ke arah itu? Mungkin saya terlepas pandang dan terlepas tenguk akan usaha Hasan ke atas itu.

Tidak cukup San kalau sekadar menjenguk gereja dari jauh ataupun ikut Tv3 buat serbuan ke sarang-sarang pelacur dan rumah-rumah urut saja. Tidak padan. Dan kerja menjenguk rumah urut itu bukan kerja Umur Ibnu Aziz yang boleh diteladani. Bukan ca! ra itu. Tidak salah kalau saya katakan dengan mengikut Tv3 buat serbuan itu untuk membolehkan Hasan melepas gian untuk melihat pelacur berkemban saja? Maaf.

Modal kedua digunakan Hasan ialah kononnya dalam Pas ada parasit. Ada lintah darat. Sebenarnya soal parasit ini sudah lama diketahui Pas. Hasan tidak payah dedah siapa mereka.Pucuk pimpinan Pas sudah menyedarinya. Pas menyedari fenomena atau peranan parasit ini sejak tahun 80-an lagi sebelum Hasan menyertai Pas. Gerakan ini sudah lama berjalan dengan menamakan diri mereka dengan pelbagai nama dan mampu menyuburkan organisasi Pas?

Ramai yang dianggap parasit ini berada dalam Pas dan berjaya membina kedudukan. Tetapi satu perkara perlu disedari parasit ini adalah parasit Islam, yang hendakkan kepada Islam. Parasit ini parasit pejuang menegakkan hukum Allah bukan pelesit mengkhianti jemaah mendokong cita-cita Allah.

Pelesit jauh berbezanya dengan pelesit. Parasit menumpang dan bekerjasama dengan induknya. Parasit sejenis tumbuh-tumbuhan. Manakala pelesit pula sejenis belalang berwarna hijau sebesar kelingking dan dipercayai membawa hantu. Kerjanya ialah merasut dan menganggu orang, menyusahkan kawan dan ada kalanya mengelecahkan akidah orang agar mengikut akidahnya. Ia ternyata lebih jahat dari parasit.

Bagi saya tindakan dan peranan parasit ini jauh lebih baik dengan cara pelesit itu. Kalau hendak dikira cara Hasan itu lebih kejam dan sadis dan mirip kepada gerak kerja pelesit. Hasan kelihatan tidak amanah kerana bertindak seolah-olah! hendak membakar kelambu kerana kegagalan membunuh seekor nyamuk. Hasan mulai bersikap seperti musang menuduh anggur yang dimakannya selama ini sebagai masam selepas gagali untuk memilik anggur yang duduk dijulai tinggi. Apakah itu bukan hipokrit?

Orang boleh menilai kerja Hasan sejauh mana Islamik atau tidak berbanding dengan nyamuk parasit yang masih bertahan untuk bersama Pas. Di sinilah saya tampak Hasan tidak fatanah dan bersikap 'tasamuh' di dalam politik.

Pada saya parasit ini ada beberapa jenis yang bukan semuanya membawa keburukan. Kalau parasit itu boleh memberi oksigen atau nitrat kepada pokok ia tidak salah malah dialu-alukan. Dalam banyak-banyak jenis parasit ini ada yang berfahaman sosialis, komunis, kapitalis atau egois.Ada juga parasit yang berfahaman Islam.

Adapun parasit yang ada dalam Pas yang hendak didedahkan dan dicemburi Hasan itu adalah parasit Islam yang mengakui Allah dan Muhammad sebagai Rasul. Yang menyertai atau menumpang Pas untuk berganding bahu dengan Pas menginfakkan profesional yang mereka ada. Ini adalah satu kebaikan kerana Pas perlukan perubahan tanpa meninggalkan asas perjuangan. Hasan sendiri boleh dianggap sebagai parasit yang memberi untung kepada Pas kerana ia ilmunya boleh dimanfaatkan Pas.

Saya suka mengambil pandangan Dr Haron Din yang menegaskan Pas ada prinsip dan dasarnya sendiri yang dimaktubkan dalam perlembagaan. Pas ada Majlis Syura Ulamak yang menjadi pemantau perjalanan Pas. Ertinya selagi Majlis Syura Ulamak tidak memberi apa-apa pan! dangan d engan kaedah dan uslub yang diambil Pas kini anggaplah ia betul dan benar. Terimalah ianya syariat yang dihalalkan.

Apakah kita sudah tidak mempercayai kepada Majlis Syura Ulamak? Bukankah badan ini tertinggi dalam Pas. Majlis Syura Ulamak juga bukan badan yang memiliki kuasa mutlak. Ahli-ahli Pas seluruhnya yang berkuasa menentukan hala tuju perjalanan dan perjuangan Pas. Ahli pula akan berpegang kepada kitab, hadith, ijmak ulamak dan qias. Apakah pandangan Hasan mengenai hal ini mengatasi pandangan atau pendapat pihak-pihak itu semua? Tidak mungkin Hasan berada dalam makam yang betul sedang makam-makam atau pendapat dan badan rasmi lain tidak bersamanya.

Tuduhan yang Hasan lakukan itu jelas dangkal dan ia modal murahan untuk mempertahankan dirinya yang kini sudah mulai hendak rapat ke dinding.

Dalam pada itu saya ingin berpesan kepada pemimpin Pas terutamanya Pesuruhjaya Pas Selangor Dr Mohd Rani Osman (insyaAllah akan mengganti tempat Ashan) supaya tidak menjawab apa-apa juga kenyataan dari Hasan. Usahlah minta dia mendedah siapa yang dianggap parasit itu. Hasan atau orang politik yang menjadi penasihatnya boleh mencipta apa saja modal untuk berbuat demikian. Seorang motivator akan bercakap selagi lidahnya tidak kejang atau dipotong.

Ingatlah suara Hasan tidak pun sebesar mana hanya pelakar di siang hari sahaja yang tidak akan menampakkan secalar cahaya pun. Bunyi mungkin kuat mengeger alam tetapi cahaya tidak sedikit pun mampu mencerahkan kandati sekerat jalan. Apa yang lebih! baik, d iam jangan peduli dan biarkan Hasan bercakap bersendirian. Lama kelamaan Tv3 atau Utusan akan jemu juga menyiarkan kenyataan Hasan yang dari hari ke hari sudah tidak ada nilai berita. Bila lengguh mulut akan berhentilah dia tanpa sesiapa menyuruhnya.

Ahsan... Ahsan. [wm.kl.1:52 t/hari 17/01/12]

http://msomelayu.blogspot.com/2012/01/ulasan-tengahari.html
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Another GoOD reason why you should VOTE ABU!

A belated revelation from a former UMNO minister -- well, badder late than neber, says this Koboi!:) So VOTE ABU at GE-13 -- yes, VOTE Anyone But UMNO/Asalkan Bukan UMNO... VOTE PAKATAN RAKYAT!

From Malaysia Chronicle~~

Tuesday, 17 January 2012 19:57

Former Minister: BN 'bombed' voters with cash


Former Cabinet Minister Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir says that cash was given to voters in previous elections and added the strategy was known as "bomb".

Kadir, who is from Umno also added that he had himself seen how cash handouts that ranged from RM200 to RM1,000 was used in Barisan Nasional's election campaigns to bribe voters in return for their support at the polls.

The former Minister of Culture, Arts and Tourism, said that the word used for the strategy was known as "bomb".

Speaking at a forum, he said "I have been the head of delegation of many campaigns and I have been given lump sums of money to distribute," said the former Information Minister at the Malaysia Strategic Outlook Conference 2012 here. "It was a blatant use of money to buy votes."

But he was quick to add that he personally didn't use the money.

James Chin, who heads the School of Social Sciences at Monash University at Sunway, and who spoke at the forum after Abdul Kadir said that "bombi! ng" wa s a very effective tool in Sabah and Sarawak.

Kadir said that while he still in Umno, he wanted to remind them of the "Merdeka trust" — which meant giving the people the right to truly free and fair elections.

Umno should not fear losing

Kadir also told Umno members not to fear losing if it was sincere in its intentions.

"If you lose accept it; people change governments all the time in US and Australia," he said. "I am an Umno man, I don't mind if I lose. If you are there just to make millions for yourself and your cronies or if I have made my billions and am afraid I will be arrested after I lose power, then I will do all these tricks."

Kadir stressed that to have free and fair elections, there must be equal access to the media and GLCs and government departments must be neutral.

"You must give the opposition the freedom to have TV, radio and newspapers," he said. "For 50 years, PAS has been asking for a newspaper licence but none given — the government is a big bully."

Barisan Nasional, he said, should not be making use of the Ministry of Information, Felda, Felcra, the Special Branch and other federal agencies to support their campaign.

Malaysia Chronicle

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

PKR: Anwar is for review of unIslamic sex laws

From malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogspot.com:~~


Monday, January 16, 2012


Anwar is for review of unIslamic sex laws, says PKR



PKR today defended de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim against accusations that he supports homosexuality, pointing out that he had actually called for a review of unIslamic laws on the issue.

"He was of the opinion that archaic laws which are not according to syariah principles and which oppress Malaysians, should be reviewed," said PKR religious bureau chief Ahmad Kassim.

Ahmad was referring to Anwar's interview with BBC which has seen him being accused of supporting homosexuality.

NONEThe BBC had asked Anwar whether he was prepared to take 'the idea of anti-discrimination as far as gay rights' are concerned.

He had replied: "We will have to review some of our archaic laws.

"We Muslims and non-Muslims in Malaysia generally believe and are committed to support the sanctity of marriage between men and women, but we should not be seen to be punit! ive and consider archaic laws as relevant."

Based on the statement, Ahmad said, Anwar had expressed commitment to heterosexual marriage and reinforced Pakatan Rakyat's stance that it would not legalise homosexuality.

"If we study Anwar's answer, it was clear he did not mention any wish to legalise homosexuality in the country," the Kuala Kedah MP said.

Ahmad called on the public to refer to Anwar's statement on their own and not rely on "propaganda by Umno-owned media".

"I also urge anyone against spinning (the issue) in the name of the Islamic struggle. Islam does not allow smearing," he added.

The interview, which was picked up by local dailies Utusan Malaysiaand Berita Harian, has provoked negative reaction from religious leaders against Anwar.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir claims BN bought votes with cash...

A former federal minister from Umno claimed today that cash was handed out in previous election campaigns in attempts to buy votes, a tactic known as "bomb".

Tan Sri Datuk Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir said in a forum today that he had experienced himself how cash handouts ranging from RM200 to RM1,000 was used in Barisan Nasional's election campaigns to gain voter support.

"I have been the head of delegation of many campaigns and I have been given lump sums of money to distribute," said the former Information Minister at the Malaysia Strategic Outlook Conference 2012 here. "It was a blatant use of money to buy votes."

Abdul Kadir (picture), who was also formerly the Minister of Culture, Arts and Tourism, said that the word used for the strategy was called "bomb".

He added though that he personally didn't use the money.

James Chin, who heads the School of Social Sciences at Monash University at Sunway, and who spoke at the forum after Abdul Kadir said that "bombing" was a very effective tool in Sabah and Sarawak.

During his presentation, Abdul Kadir said that while he still held positions in Umno, he wanted to remind them of the "Merdeka trust" — which meant giving the people the right to truly free and fair elections.

He also urged Umno not to fear losing if it was sincere in its intentions.

"If you lose accept it; people change governments all the time in US and! Austral ia," he said. "I am an Umno man, I don't mind if I lose. If you are there just to make millions for yourself and your cronies or if I have made my billions and am afraid I will be arrested after I lose power, then I will do all these tricks."

"If you are sincere, you have nothing to fear," he added.

He said that to have free and fair elections, there must be equal access to the media and GLCs and government departments must be neutral.

"You must give them (the opposition) the freedom to have TV, radio and newspapers," he said. "For 50 years, PAS has been asking for a newspaper licence but none given — the government is a big bully."

He also said that during elections, Barisan Nasional should not be making use of the Ministry of Information, Felda, Felcra, the Special Branch and other federal agencies to support their campaign.

Abdul Kadir is also the deputy president of non-partisan pro-unity NGO Angkatan Amanah Merdeka (Amanah) and executive chairman of the Sazean group.



Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir dakwa BN beli undi dengan wang tunai

Bekas menteri persekutuan daripada Umno hari ini mendakwa wang yang digunakan pada kempen pilihan raya lalu adalah untuk membeli undi, satu taktik yang dikenali sebagai "bom".

Tan Sri Datuk Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir (gambar)! berkat a demikian dalam satu forum dengan menjelaskan mengalami pengalaman itu sendiri dengan memberi RM200 hingga RM1,000 dalam kempen pilihan raya Barisan Nasional (BN) untuk mendapat undi.

"Saya telah menjadi ketua dalam banyak kempen dan saya diberikan wang dalam jumlah yang banyak untuk diagihkan," kata bekas menteri penerangan dan pelancongan di Persidangan Perancangan Strategik Malaysia 2012 di sini.

"Ia secara terang-terangan untuk membeli undi."

Abdul Kadir berkata istilah yang digunakan untuk strategi itu adalah "bom".

Beliau menambah secara peribadi tidak pernah menggunakan wang itu.

James Chin, Ketua Sekolah Seni dan Sains Sosial, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, berkata strategi itu merupakan paling berkesan di Sabah dan Sarawak.

Semasa ucapannya, Abdul Kadir berkata semasa beliau masih memegang jawatan dalam Umno, beliau mahu mengingatkan mereka tentang "Amanah Merdeka" — yang bermaksud memberi rakyat hak untuk mempunyai pilihan raya bersih dan adil.

Beliau turut menggesa Umno agar tidak perlu takut untuk kalah sekiranya ikhlas dalam perjuangan.

"Jika anda kalah, terimanya; rakyat ubah kerajaan banyak kali di USA dan Australia," katanya.

"Saya adalah ahli Umno, saya tiada masalah jika kalah. Jika anda berada di sana untuk menggunakan jutaan ringgit untuk diri sendiri dan kroni anda atau jika saya mempunyai bilion ringgit dan saya akan ditangkap selepas saya kehilangan kuasa, maka saya akan gunakan semua tipu helah ini.

"Jika anda ikhlas, tiada apa yang perlu ditakutkan," ta! mbahnya.

Beliau berkata untuk mempunyai pilihan raya bersih dan adil, perlu ada akses sama rata terhadap media, syarikat berkaitan kerajaan (GLC) dan jabatan kerajaan mesti neutral.

"Anda perlu berikan mereka (pembangkang) kebebasan untuk mempunyai TV, radio dan akhbar," katanya. "Selama 50 tahun PAS telah meminta lesen akhbar tetapi tidak diberikan — kerajaan pembuli besar."

Beliau menambah semasa pilihan raya, BN tidak sepatutnya menggunakan Kementerian Penerangan, Felda, Felcra dan Unit Cawangan Khas (SB) serta agensi lain untuk membantu kempen mereka.

Abdul Kadir juga Timbalan Presiden Angkatan Amanah Merdeka dan Pengerusi Eksekutif Kumpulan Sazean.

source:malaysian insider

cheers.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

National Feedlot Corporation has given two powerful reasons why there should be a RCI into the “cattle condo” scandal

Media conference statement by Lim Kit Siang in Sibu on Tuesday, 17th January 2012: 

National Feedlot Corporation has given two powerful reasons why there should be a RCI into the "cattle condo" scandal

The National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) has today given two powerful reasons why there should be a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the RM300 million "cattle condo" scandal, focussing on the role and responsibility of Deputy Prime Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin who was the Agriculture Minister who approved the RM250 million loan project before the "308" political tsunami.

The company declared today that its contract for its RM250 million loan from the government was signed in 2007, disputing the Public Accounts Committee's (PAC) earlier claim that the company had received the sum before the contract was signed.

NFC said the loan agreement between the government represented by the Ministry of Finance and NFC was signed on December 6, 2007, and not in 2010 and that the first drawdown of RM7 million was in January 2008 "in compliance with proper procedure".

It claimed that beginning this year, NFC "will start serving its loan repayment as stipulated in its loan agreement".

The NFC statement, confirming that the decisive events of the "cattle condo" scandal, viz, the award of the NFC project on 27th October 2006, the signing of the RM250 million loan agreement with 2% interest on December 6, 2007 and the first drawdown of RM7 million in January 2008 all took place before the March 8 "political tsunami" when the Minister responsible was none other than Muhyiddin.

It provides powerful reason why there should be a Royal Commission of Inquiry into all the "horror stories" of the RM300 million NFC "cattle condo" scandal but also to focus on the role and responsibility of Muhyiddin as the Cabinet Minister who should personally and directly be responsible for the scandal.

Let the RCI answer the question: Who else apart from Muhyiddin should bear the full and final responsibility for the NFC "mess" where the objective of the project on cattle production to boost the nation's beef self-sufficiency could go so wrong as NFC not only failed to meet this target, the RM250 million 2%-interest soft loan had been diverted not only to buy two luxury condominiums in Bangsar and a luxury condominium in Singapore but also for many other dubious transactions.

The NFC statement today also reminds Malaysians that the Public Accounts Committee has been acting in a most unusual manner, as apart from its initial meeting, it had failed to carry out full investigations into the "cattle condo" scandal to be able to present a report to Parliament when it meets on March 12 – although it is the No.1 scandal of the day!

Malaysians are entitled to know why the PAC is behaving in so tardy a fashion, giving the impression that the PAC is avoiding from coming to grips with the issue. Can PAC submit its report on the NFC scandal to Parliament by March 12?


*Lim Kit Siang, DAP Parliamentary Leader & MP for Ipoh Timor

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Grassroots defend Nurul from Nong Chik's flak...

forum pru13 undi siapa jadi penentu 131211 nurul izzahA PKR grassroots leader fended off accusations that Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar is merely taking credit for BN's efforts to help her constituents and not doing her job.

"Actually, Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin is the one who should be worried because many had said that he did not perform his duties for the whole of the Federal Territories, which include 11 parliamentary constituencies plus Putrajaya and Labuan," said Lembah Pantai PKR division deputy chief Mohd Amin Mian.



Raja Nong Chik (left) had reportedly said on Sunday that, "PKR only knows to criticise, but they had done nothing constructive in the past four years.



"Only when we (BN) succeeded in something, do they try to hitch a ride.



"For example, when we obtained funding from Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to paint houses in Taman Sri Sentosa and Terminal Sejahtera, they said it was due to pressure from PKR.



"When did they pressure us? No such thing. They did not do anything in the past two years," Sinar Harian quoted the Lembah Pantai Umno division chief as saying.



'We can see what you did'


In his rebuttal against Raja Nong Chik, Mohd Amin claimed that the senator focussed mostly on one constituency and ignored the rest.


Mohd Amin also made several claims that implicated Raja Nong Chik, including:


1. The minister had allegedly used ! Kuala Lu mpur City Hall (DBKL) funds for his own political interests;

2. He asked whether the contract for painting the People's Housing Project (PPR) flats were openly tendered or given to cronies;


3. That Kampung Baru residents were disappointed with the Kampung Baru Development Corporation Bill.


In addition, Mohd Amin said if there are any problems with drainage, rubbish, roads, or mosquitoes, it means Raja Nong Chik is not doing his job because all these are DBKL's responsibilities.



"Therefore I would like to remind Raja Nong Chik again, remember that Federal Territory residents can see everything that he does," he said.



Akar umbi pertahan Izzah dari serangan Nong Chik

Akar umbi PKR hari ini mempertahankan anggota parlimen Lembah Pantai Nurul Izzah Anwar daripada dakwaan tidak melaksanakan tanggungjawab dan hanya menumpang usaha BN membantu penduduk kawasan itu.


NONE

Sambil menyangkal dakwaan Datuk Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin(kiri), naib ketua cabang PKR Lembah Pantai Mohd Amin Mian berkata, menteri Wilayah Persekutuan dan kesejahteraan bandar bercakap tidak kena tempat.



"Sebenarnya beliaulah yang patut lebih risau, kerana ramai yang mengatakan beliau tidak menunaikan tanggungjawab kepada seluruh Wilayah Pe! rsekutua n, yang merangkumi 11 kawasan parlimen serta Putrajaya dan Labuan," kata Mohd Amin.



Raja Nong Chik kelmarin dilaporkan berkata PKR hanya tahu mengkritik, tetapi hampir empat tahun tiada perkara yang membina dibuat, kecuali menumpang BN.


Sebagai contoh, kata Raja Nong Chik, pihaknya mendapatkan peruntukan daripada perdana menteri untuk mengecat rumah di Taman Sri Sentosa dan Terminal Sejahtera tetapi PKR mendakwa ia dibuat atas desakan mereka.


NONEDalam serangan balas kepada Raja Nong Chik (kanan), Mohd Amin juga mendakwa pada Ramadan lalu, senator itu menumpukan hampir 85 peratus di satu kawasan parlimen sahaja dan mengabaikan selebihnya.


Mohd Amin juga membangkitkan beberapa dakwaan yang dikaitkan dengan Raja Nong Chik:


1. Menteri itu didakwa menggunakan dana Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) untuk kepentingan politik sendiri.


2. Membangkitkan sama ada tender kerja-kerja mengecat bangunan Projek Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) diberi secara terbuka atau kepada kroni.


3. Menyatakan kekecewaan penduduk Kampung Baru terhadap Rang Undang-undang Perbadanan Pembangunan Kampung Baru.


Selain itu, Mohd Amin berkata, sekiranya terdapat masalah melibatkan longkang, sampah, jalan atau nyamuk, ia bermakna Raja Nong Chik yang tidak bekerja ke! rana sem ua itu tugas bawah DBKL.


"Maka sekali lagi saya ingin ingatkan Raja Nong Chik, beringat-ingatlah. Penduduk Wilayah Persekutuan melihat setiap perkara yang anda lakukan," katanya.


source:malaysiakini

cheers.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

When will Gerakan and other Barisan Nasional leaders learn

When will Gerakan and other Barisan Nasional leaders learn

 red arrow http://dapmalaysia.org 

 red arrow http://liewchintong.com/ 

 

Media statement by Liew Chin Tong in George Town on Tuesday, 17th January 2012:

When will Gerakan and other Barisan Nasional leaders learn

Gerakan can only understand politics the way its leaders have been taught by their political masters, i.e. to be subservient to UMNO. They accept the dominance of UMNO over all other Barisan Nasional component parties.

  1. Begging the Federal Government

    Hence Penang Gerakan Chief Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan's attacks on Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng for not using the "proper channel" to ask for "goodies" or projects from the Federal Government. Essentially, Teng and Gerakan are asking the people to beg from the Federal Government.

    It was reported by Bernama yesterday that Dr Teng had said that "if the chief minister was having any problem with any project, he should use the proper channel to address it and not through the media".

    Lest Dr Teng forgets, the Federal Government collects taxes and it is its responsiblity to develop all the states. Lim Guan Eng as the Chief Minister speaks on behalf of the people of Penang. He doesn't have to beg for the rights of the people. It is the Federal Government that must fulfill its duty.

    If the Federal Government doesn't act in accordance with the wishes of the people and the federal constitution, for the sake of Penang's future, let's put a new set of leaders in Putrajaya.

  2. Lies about Sungai Nyior toll

    Gerakan and other BN leaders have also spread lies against the Pakatan Rakyat government of Penang when they claimed that the DAP has failed to abolish the Sungai Nyior toll.

    The toll road is controlled by the Federal Government. The State under Pakatan has built an alternative road to the toll road.

    If there's anyone who can abolish the roll, it must be the Federal Government. Perhaps Gerakan leaders have forgotten that they must beg the Federal Government to abolish that toll?

    All BN component leaders must remember that it is Lim Guan Eng who is tirelessly opposing the extension of toll concessions by the Federal Government on behalf of the toll operators, the private profiteers.

  3. Reducing the people's financial burden

    I support Lim Guan Eng's challenge to Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop to debate on how to reduce the burden of tolls on the public. The government must understand that in a time of difficult international economic milieu, domestic demand is crucial to our economic survival.

    The best way of boosting domestic demand is to increase the disposable income of the ordinary citizens. In its stead, BN is allowing private profiteers to suck the last drop of blood from ordinary citizens through toll roads as well as other unnecessary "taxes".


* Liew Chin Tong, DAP International Secretary & MP for Bukit Bendera

 

Valid HTML 4.0 Transitional

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Flurry to register BN-friendly Sabah parties

KOTA KINABALU: Amidst increasing concerns over Umno Sabah's ability to hold itself together ahead of a defining 13th general election, Home Ministry officials today met with representatives from 12 groups aspiring to register themselves as political parties.

The meeting with the 12 pro-tem presidents and secretaries-general also saw the presence of a deputy minister. This indicates that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak has given the "green light" for more parties to be registered in Sabah and for this to be done "quickly".

Some of these parties had applied for registration years ago and had been put on hold until now.

Among the aspiring political parties represented at the meeting were Usno Baru, Parti Cinta Sabah, Parti Perpaduan Rakyat, Parti Kebenaran Sabah, Parti Kebangsaan Sabah, Pakar, Parti Pembangunan Warisan Sabah, Parti Ekonomi Rakyat Sabah, and Parti Bersatu Bugis Sabah.

Each of the parties was represented by its president and secretary-general.

According to those present at the closed-door meeting with with deputy minister Lee Chee Leong, they were told them that their applications would be given due consideration bearing in mind "their democratic right" and the impending general election.

He apparently said: "We will bring today's matters to another (higher level) meeting where we will deliberate on your applications…"

Registrar of Societies (ROS) officers, who were approached, refused to reveal the names of the parties and the nature of the discussion with Lee except to say that "it is the final process (of registration)".

'Three new parties likely'

Meanwhile, a pro-tem secretary-general of an aspiring party told FMT that the meeting could have been ordered by Najib who is already being accused of practising doubl standard in democratisation and transparency by delaying or refusing outright to register applications of new political parties from Sabah.

"I sense that the authority may approve three new parties soon in Sabah.

"We don't know which parties will be approved but it seems they do not want to be accused of denying us our democratic rights.

"They know we can go to court for a 'mandamus order' to compel the ROS to register, so why must go to court if Najib is sincere in liberalising the country?" said the man who requested anonymity.

Another secretary-general, who also asked not to be identified, claimed that he deciphered "signals" from the briefing that new parties would be registered if it is to bring advantages to the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition.

Speculations are rife that Najib is setting in motion his gameplan to contain Umno Sabah and BN's weakening grip in the state.

BN is struggling under relentless attacks over alleged abuse of power, land grabs, unfair federal policies, victimisation and escalating cost of living.

Observers here see today's meeting as an indication that the BN-direct membership process is finally taking shape and that Najib is putting his gameplan into action.

They were also curious about the timing of the meeting with 12 "new" parties, some of whom had given up hope of registrating their party and are known to have joined other political parties like Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), STAR and also Kita.

Lajim ignores Muhyiddin

Coincidence or otherwise, several top Umno leaders – Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, and vice-presidents Hishammuddin Hussein and Shafie Apdal – were also in town today.

They have been busy meeting with local Umno warlords and gauging the "real" situation on the ground.

Rumblings of dissent among the ranks is worrying Najib.

At last night's meeting with Muhyiddin, a key Umno member, Lajim Ukin, was missing.

Lajim's absence has further fuelled speculations that the party's influential chieftain in Beaufort, south of Sabah, is set to quit Umno.

Rumour has it that Lajim is set to lead a small Bumiputera party and that he had met with Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim.

Lajim also apparently has made it known that he is available for talks with the Anything But Umno (ABU) group.

Lajim's "fame" dates back to 1994 when he allegedly triggered the downfall of Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS).

Also Read

More new political parties in Sabah?

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

NFC to start repaying loan this year

PETALING JAYA: National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) will start repaying the controversial RM250 million soft loan from this year.

The alleged misuse of the loan has been the crux of criticism against NFC. Among others, the money has been allegedly misused to purchase luxurious condominiums in Bangsar and Singapore and luxurious car, premium plots of land in Putrajaya and to fund private overseas trip of the directors associated with NFC

In a statement today, NFC said that the loan was given in 2007, with the first drawdown amounting to RM7 million made in January 2008. No information was provided as to whether the full loan amount has been withdrawn. The period of loan repayment is 20 years.

PKR in November said that the full amount of the loan has been withdrawn. PKR alleged then that the first drawdown was RM130 million.

The opposition party has been responsible for unearthing many of the allegations in relation to NFC which is operated by Women, Family and Community Development Minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil's family.

NFC said that the loan was extended to them in order "to build a planned, sustained and integrated beef production business that will enable the country to attain 40 percent self-sufficiency".

In recent days, NFC has been actively releasing press statements and clarifying previous new reports in an attempt to "damage-control".

Today, NFC refuted a two-month-old allegation in news reports that the loan was given out even before a loan agreement was signed between the government and NFC.

Parliament's Public Accounts Committee (PAC) chairman Azmi Khalid announced after a meeting with Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Ministry high-level representatives in November that the full amount of the loan was disbursed to NFC even before agreements for the projects were signed.

"Following misreporting of the facts, NFC clarifies that the loan agreement between the Government of Malaysia represented by the Finance Ministry and NFC Sdn Bhd was signed on Dec 6, and not in 2010.

"The first drawdown of RM7 million was made in January 2008 in compliance with proper procedure," it said.

It added that the NFC and the Agriculture and Agro-Based Industry Ministry signed a separate "implementation agreement" for the NFC in March 2010.

'Powerful reason'

The corporation added that it was optimistic it will meet its loan repayments as NFC's projected revenue rides on the back of "increasing orders of beef and beef products".

"Just this month alone the orders have been valued at RM1.9 million," it said, declining to reveal the actual amount of profit made from these orders.

Part of the government's High Impact Project under Ninth Malaysia Plan, the project was mooted to be the country's "Beef Valley" to produce 40 percent self sufficiency for beef production by 2010.

The Auditor-General's Report, however, stated that the project was "a mess", falling short of its set targets.

In a separate press statement, DAP stalwart Lim Kit Siang zeroed in on then Agriculture Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, demanding that an Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) be established to oversee the controversy with special focus on Muhyiddin's role in the deal.

Lim said that the statement from NFC provides "powerful reason" why there should be an RCI into the controversy and focus on the role of Muhyiddin who "should personally and directly be responsible for the scandal".

He added that RCI should also determine other Cabinet ministers who should be held responsible for the controversial project.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

When will Gerakan leaders learn?

Gerakan can only understand politics the way its leaders have been taught by their political masters, i.e. to be subservient to UMNO. They accept the dominance of UMNO over all other Barisan Nasional component parties.

Hence Penang Gerakan Chief Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan's attacks on Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng for not using the "proper channel" to ask for "goodies" or projects from the Federal Government. Essentially, Teng and Gerakan are asking the people to beg from the Federal Government.

It was Gerakan's way of begging that made the people angry and voted BN out of Penang on 8 March 2008.

It was reported by Bernama on January 16 that Dr Teng had said that "if the chief minister was having any problem with any project, he should use the proper channel to address it and not through the media".

Lest Dr Teng forgets, the Federal Government collects taxes and it is its responsiblity to develop all the states. Lim Guan Eng as the Chief Minister speaks on behalf of the people of Penang. He doesn't have to beg for the rights of the people. It is the Federal Government that must fulfill its duty.

If the Federal Government doesn't act in accordance with the wishes of the people and the federal constitution, for the sake of Penang's future, let's put a new set of leaders in Putrajaya.

Gerakan and other BN leaders have also spread lies against the Pakatan Rakyat government of Penang when they claimed that the DAP has failed to abolish the Sungai Nyior toll.

The toll road is controlled by the Federal Government. The State under Pakatan has built an alternative road to the toll road.

If there's anyone who can abolish the roll, it must be the Federal Government. Perhaps Gerakan leaders have forgotten that they must beg the Federal Government to abolish that toll?

All BN component leaders must remember that it is Lim Guan Eng who is tirelessly opposing the extension of toll concessions by the Federal Government on behalf of ! the toll operators, the private profiteers.

I support Lim Guan Eng's challenge to Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop to debate on how to reduce the burden of tolls on the public. The government must understand that in a time of difficult international economic milieu, domestic demand is crucial to our economic survival.

The best way of boosting domestic demand is to increase the disposable income of the ordinary citizens. In its stead, BN is allowing private profiteers to suck the last drop of blood from ordinary citizens through toll roads as well as other unnecessary taxes.

* The writer is member of parliament for Bukit Bendera, Penang.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

MAIS tubuh jawatankuasa tetap tangani isu murtad dan ajaran sesat

SHAH ALAM: Majlis Agama Islam Selangor (MAIS) menubuhkan Jawatankuasa Pengurusan Aduan dan Penguatkuasaan bagi memantau serta menangani isu murtad dan ajaran sesat di negeri ini.

Pengerusi MAIS Datuk Mohamad Adzib Mohd Isa berkata jawatankuasa berkenaan akan menerima serta memantau aduan berhubung usaha memurtadkan umat Islam dan ajaran sesat di negeri ini termasuk mengambil tindakan penguatkuasaan yang sewajarnya.

"Dalam mesyuarat MAIS hari ini kita telah putuskan untuk tubuhkan jawatankuasa tetap berkenaan untuk menyelia segala aduan berkaitan kes murtad dan ajaran sesat yang boleh memesong akidah umat Islam di Selangor.

"Jawatankuasa ini diletakkan di bawah MAIS dan akan bekerjasama dengan Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (JAIS)," katanya selepas mengumumkan prestasi kutipan dan agihan zakat di Selangor bagi tahun 2011 di sini hari ini.

Beliau berkata jawatankuasa itu juga berperanan untuk memantau bantuan kepada fakir dan miskin di negeri ini dalam usaha memastikan mereka tidak terdedah kepada gejala murtad ekoran kesukaran mendapat bantuan daripada pihak zakat.

Mualaf

Mohamad Adzib berkata jawatankuasa itu akan bekerjasama dengan LZS sekiranya menerima aduan kesukaran mendapatkan bantuan oleh golongan yang memerlukan termasuk bantuan membabitkan golongan mualaf.

Terdahulu, beliau mengumumkan bahawa LZS mengutip RM393.54 juta zakat di Selangor bagi tahun lepas berbanding RM336.93 juta pada 2010 iaitu peningkatan sebanyak 17 peratus.

Beliau berkata jumlah pembayar zakat juga mencatakan peningkatan iaitu seramai 180,090 orang pada tahun lepas, berbanding 168,002 orang pada 2010 membabitkan 28,979 orang pembayar baru.

Katanya, zakat pendapatan mencatatkan kutipan tertinggi iaitu RM216 juta, diikuti zakat perniagaan (RM79.7 juta) dan zakat harta (RM33.7 juta).

Mohd Adzib berkata LZS mensasarkan kutipan RM430 juta bagi tahun ini dengan peningkatan sebanyak sembilan peratus.

Bernama

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Anwar is for Islamic laws, not homosexuality...

NONEPKR today defended de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim against accusations that he supports homosexuality, pointing out that he had actually called for a review of unIslamic laws on the issue.

"He was of the opinion that archaic laws which are not according to syariah principles and which oppress Malaysians, should be reviewed," said PKR religious bureau chief Ahmad Kassim.

Ahmad was referring to Anwar's interview with BBC which has seen him being accused of supporting homosexuality.

The BBC had asked Anwar whether he was prepared to take 'the idea of anti-discrimination as far as gay rights' are concerned.

He had replied: "We will have to review some of our archaic laws.

"We Muslims and non-Muslims in Malaysia generally believe and are committed to support the sanctity of marriage between men and women, but we should not be seen to be punitive and consider archaic laws as relevant."

Based on the statement, Ahmad said, Anwar had expressed commitment to heterosexual marriage and reinforced Pakatan Rakyat's stance that it would not legalise homosexuality.

"If we study Anwar's answer, it was clear he did not mention any wish to legalise homosexuality in the country," the Kuala Kedah MP said.


Ahmad called on the public to refer to Anwar's statement on their own and not rely on "propaganda by Umno-owned media".

"I also urge anyone against spinning (the issue) in the name of the Islamic struggle. Islam does not allow smearing," he added.

The interview, which was picked up by local dailies Utusan Malaysia and Berita Harian, has provoked negative reaction from religious leaders against Anwar.

source:malaysiakini

Anwar di BBC- Kenyataan yang disembunyikan oleh TV3 suku dan media massa gomen.

cheers.
Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Adun Umno didakwa berbohong

KUALA TERENGGANU: Seorang bekas pemimpin Puteri Umno di Terengganu mendakwa Adun Telok Pasu, Datuk Mohd Rahin Said telah memperdaya penduduk kampung dalam  pengambilan tanah.

Kerajaan  negeri mengambil tanah di Kampung Banggol Donas dekat Kuala Terengganu bagi pembinaan jalan dan jambatan.

Rusni Hassan berkata, Adun itu didakwa berbohong sebanyak dua kali iaitu ketika projek baru dimulakan dan kali kedua sewaktu mengumumkan bayaran pampasan tanah tersebut.

Bukan ketua

"Beliau ucap terima kasih keana penduduk kampung bersetuju dengan pembinaan tersebut, sedangkan tiada perbincangan dengan orang kampung,

"Minggu lalu pula Rahin berkata pampasan tanah RM1 juta bagi sehektar, mana boleh sama pampasan tanah pembangunan dengan tanah pertanian,"ujar Rusni.

Ketika dihubungi, Rahin berkata, Rusni bukan ketua Puteri Umno seperti yang didakwa.

Katanya, Rusni bebas bercakap apa sahaja kerana negara mengamalkan demokrasi.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

RPK whistling BN tune

Exiled controversial blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin is waxing lyrical about the Barisan Nasional (BN) leadership, but not before undermining opposition coalition Pakatan Rakyat, election watchdog Bersih 2.0 and the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM).

Raja Petra, or popularly known as RPK, had in the past made himself available to the mainstream media – TV3, Utusan Malaysia and, more recently, the New Sunday Times. While Utusan Malaysia is Umno-dominated, both TV3 and NSTP are owned by Media Prima, an Umno ally.

In his latest interview with NST early this month, RPK, among others, condemned Pakatan adviser Anwar Ibrahim. He went at great length to clarify why the Anwar-factor posed more harm than good to the peace of the nation.

In the same interview, RPK urged Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to take the "bull by the horns" in introducing reforms instead of resorting to cosmetic changes.

While RPK is right that there is life after Anwar, the former is correct again when he said that the agenda for change cannot be about personalities per se, citing the case of Nelson Mandela, the former South African president who spent 27 years in jail for his fight against apartheid.

The aftermath of RPK's latest interview has regrettably done more harm than good, at least to those who had dedicated themselves to the struggle for change.

The damage done: MCLM president Haris Ibrahim quit the movement. Two independent candidates backed by MCLM announced their withdrawal and disassociation from the movement.

The two are National Human Rights Society president, Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, and human rights lawyer, Sreekant Pillai.

The trio Haris, Malik and Sreekant cited the recent interviews given by RPK, to selected media as the reason for their abandoning the movement.

In the same interview, RPK, owner of the Malaysia Today portal and chairman of MCLM, declared Anwar "unfit" to be the next prime minister and said the latter was guilty of the sodomy charge involving his former aide Saiful Bukhari Azlan and expressed certainty that Anwar was the man featured in the sex video.

(Three years ago, Anwar was charged with having sodomised Saiful, then 24, in a condominium unit in Bukit Damansara on June 26, 2008.)

Anwar, however, was discharged and acquitted by the the High Court on Jan 9, 2012, as judge Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah expressed uncertainty as to whether the DNA evidence had been compromised.

On MCLM, RPK said it would not be fielding any candidates in the 13th general election, a statement that Haris begged to differ saying no such discussion was undertaken by the movement.

Why has the 61-year-old RPK, who "once upon a time" fiercely supported Anwar, is today doing the reverse, playing judge and jury in determining Anwar's fate, politically, that is?

Not only that, RPK also undermined the "reform agenda" and condemned Bersih 2.0, claiming it harboured political interests.

RPK sold to Najib and co?

RPK has no qualms claiming Anwar is morally unfit to lead Malaysia. But then how different is Najib or his deputy Muhyiddin Yassin? The former is alleged to have had an affair with Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu and said to be involved in the multi-million dollar kickbacks through the sale of the Scorpene submarines during his tenure as defence minister.

Muhyiddin, meanwhile, has made pursuing the Malay agenda his all-time priority, that too at the expense of the non-Malays. Putting self-interest above the welfare of the people is no hallmark of an exemplary leader.

Needless to say, the interviews by RPK to selected mainstream press were "melodious" tunes to the ears of Najib and Barisan Nasional-Umno, who are only too eager to get rid of Pakatan Rakyat, never mind the fact that Najib's former information chief in his Umno division, Mohd Ariff Sabri Aziz, has joined the DAP.

Mohd Ariff, the former Pulau Manis Umno assemblyman, was impressed by DAP's principles and professionalism, unlike BN which worked best at spreading lies.

"I was with (Lim) Guan Eng at the bloggers' conference last month. There are no fancy words, they are focused on work… always thinking unlike our Umno people," Mohd Ariff was quoted by FMT earlier this week as saying.

Still, RPK is very sure the opposition has no chance at helming the nation via Putrajaya. Just how has the Anwar-Pakatan bashing by RPK come to be?

What an irony that RPK, who, through his Malaysia Today columns, once advocated transparency, accountability and justice in the Malaysian political system, has changed his tune, which unfortunately jars on conscientious ears.

In 2008, RPK was charged with sedition for allegedly implying Najib, then deputy premier, had a hand in the killing of Altantuya. The same year RPK in a statutory declaration (SD) alleged that Najib's flamboyant wife Rosmah Mansor was one of the three individuals who were present at the crime scene where the Mongolian was murdered.

For reasons best known to him, RPK later distanced himself from the SD and in an interview with TV3, said his accusations linking Najib and Rosmah to the murder was information passed on to him by opposition figures.

RPK contradicted himself when earlier on he claimed the allegations in the SD were contained in a military intelligence report received by the then prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

MCLM, however, claimed that the interview was heavily edited and spin-doctored in favour of Najib, the timing being perfect in view of the upcoming Sarawak state election then.

MCLM serving RPK's agenda?

With Haris, Malik and Sreekant disassociating themselves from MCLM, does it give RPK the much-needed space and opportunity to helm the movement "autonomously", calling the shots as and when he wants to?

Malik later clarified that while he was never a MCLM member, he, however, was committed towards working for the movement to further the reform agenda. He had agreed to contest as an independent candidate as he believed and was satisfied that there was a cause for it.

Malik stressed that his belief that Pakatan Rakyat was pivotal in any campaign reform remains and that he had resolved to contest only when there was no three-cornered fight.

While he does not share RPK's views which Malik said were entirely personal and not coming from MCLM, the damage has been done.

"Raja Petra had, however, allowed the impression that he spoke on behalf of MCLM and in his capacity as chairman of the movement," Malik pointed out. "That is regrettable as it is an impression that has undermined the credibility of the MCLM and its efforts."

"It has also undermined the tremendous efforts of a number of highly committed and selfless individuals in their untiring efforts to develop various civil society initiatives under the banner of MCLM," Malik wrote in a blog posting on Jan 3.

Ironically, in 2008 it was Malik, who, as RPK's lawyer, tried to move the blogger's release in a court hearing after RPK was detained under the Internal Security Act (now defunct) for allegedly "insulting Islam" and publishing articles on Malaysia Today which had tarnished the country's leadership to the point of causing confusion among the people.

Jeswan Kaur is a freelance writer and a FMT columnist.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Tentang Seks, Pentas dan Negara

Saya tidak berpeluang menonton "The Vagina Monologues" karya Eve Ensler yang diarah oleh Ann Lee sebelum dan selepas pementasannya diharamkan di Malaysia suatu masa dahulu.

Namun, apabila mendapat tahu bahawa buku "Sex, Stage & State: Kuali Works Plays" yang memuatkan tujuh skrip yang dihasilkan Ann Lee dan rakan-rakan "kuali"nya akan dilancarkan di Bali, Indonesia pada 7 Oktober tahun lalu, saya tidak melepaskan peluang untuk hadir sama pada majlis eksklusif itu.

Sebenarnya, kebetulan saya berada di sana kerana menyertai Ubud Writers & Readers Festival dan majlis pelancaran buku berkenaan adalah sebahagian acara sampingan festival.

Buku setebal 297 halaman ini diterbitkan oleh Parama Adhi Perkasa, Jakarta pada September 2011 dan amat sesuai dijadikan koleksi peminat teater bermutu tanpa mengira kewarganegaraan.

Sharon Bakar dan saya menghadiri majlis pelancaran "Sex, Stage & State" di Rumah Valentine, Ubud antara lain kerana mahu memberi sokongan moral kepada Ann Lee dan rakan-rakannya yang giat mengangkat martabat teater di Malaysia.

Beliau yang lahir di Tawau, Sabah serta mendapat pendidikan di Universiti Westminster dan Universiti Oxford, pernah menjadi penyampai berita di Radio Televisyen Malaysia (RTM). Malah, di situlah persahabatan kami bermula.

Di Rumah Valentine pula, saya turut berpeluang bertemu Goh Soon Siew, Foo May Lyn, Kathy Rowland dan Jo Kukathas yang merupakan antara orang kuat yang terlibat dengan Kuali Works secara langsung atau tidak langsung.

Facebook

Jo Kukathas hanya rakan saya di ruang siber menerusi Facebook. Saya mengenali dan mengagumi beliau manakala beliau tidak mengenali saya, demikian andaian saya pada mulanya).

Pengarah, penulis dan pelakon teater ini juga pengarah artistik di Instant Cafe Theatre Company. Terkini, Jo Kukathas mengarah teater "Parah" karya Alfian Sa'at yang dijadual dipentaskan di Kuala Lumpur Performing Arts Centre (KLPAC) pada 1-5 Februari 2012.

Kathy Rowland pernah saya temui suatu ketika dahulu – entah di mana; kami berdua sudah lupa dan kami kadang-kadang berkomunikasi menerusi e-mel.

Pertemuan di Rumah Valentine pula membuka ruang dan peluang untuk kami semua duduk berbual tentang pelbagai perkara: sastera, seni, politik, makanan dan rakyat.

Berbalik pada "Sex, Stage & State", kesemua tujuh skrip yang termuat di dalamnya adalah bahan dokumentasi yang penting; khususnya dalam meneliti "suara" golongan aktivis teater – khasnya wanita – dalam mengetengahkan "women's issues – that is, anything under the sun" seperti yang menjadi pegangan Kuali Works sejak ditubuhkan pada 1994.

"Happy Families" yang ditulis dan diarah oleh Ann Lee pada 18-22 November 1993 berlatarkan Sabah dan mengangkat tema penderaan seksual. Kisah disampaikan menerusi pengalaman sekumpulan kanak-kanak yang baru mula mengenai makna "dewasa".

Petikan teater ini turut dipersembahkan oleh Ann Lee, Foo May Lyn dan Jo Kukathas semasa pelancaran buku di Rumah Valentine. Mesej yang terkandung dalam teater itu merentas zaman, batas geografi dan budaya. Sesiapa sahaja boleh menjadi "mangsa".

Mke Tyson

"Kuala Lumpur Knock-Out" yang pertama kali dipersembahkan di Panggung Eksperimen, Kuala Lumpur pada 6-11 November 1996 bukan sekadar kisah seorang "minah kilang" yang bercita-cita menentang Mike Tyson di gelanggang tinju.

"Ternyata Ann Lee mendapat idea daripada peristiwa seorang politikus penting pada waktu itu yang dilaporkan mengadakan hubungan sulit bersama seorang remaja wajah umur.

"Tidak lama kemudian, beberapa lagi politikus tampil membuat pendedahan mengaibkan mengenai remaja itu hingga akhirnya tumpuan media yang dikuasai politik sudah berpindah daripada kisah seorang politikus merogol gadis bawah umur kepada kisah gadis tidak bermoral," kata Kathy Rowland sewaktu memperkatakan skrip berkenaan.

Teater "Sang Kancil – the Mousedeer that Roared" yang ditulis bersama oleh Ann Lee dan Foo May Lyn juga ada kisah tersendiri yang mungkin kurang diketahui orang.

"Apabila pementasan teater itu sudah bermula, Kuali Works mendapat panggilan telefon daripada seorang individu yang memperkenalkan dirinya sebagai Inspektor Nathan dari Bukit Aman dan mahu tahu di mana saya berada.

"Skrip teater itu adalah berdasarkan insiden yang berlaku ke atas Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim pada 1998. Maka, saya rasa terancam berikutan panggilan telefon itu. Akibatnya, saya tidak bermalam di tempat yang sama selama beberapa hari kerana bimbang ditahan di bawah ISA," Ann Lee menceritakan.

Sang kancil

Kathy Rowland turut memuji kemampuan dan keberanian Ann Lee dan Foo May Lyn mengadun kisah tradisi dan isu politik semasa dengan mengangkat watak Sang Kancil yang berjaya memanipulasi sekumpulan buaya tetapi kemudian mendapati dirinya terpinggir dan hilang moral akibat perbuatan sendiri.

Sedutan teater berkenaan yang dipersembahkan oleh Foo May Lyn pada 7 Oktober 2011 membuktikan kekuatan skrip dan kehebatan lakonannya dalam membawakan watak Sang Kancil yang sesungguhnya adalah gambaran orang politik tertentu yang licik menipu rakyat.

Dalam perkembangan lain, hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur, Datuk Mohamad Zabidin memutuskan pada Isnin minggu lalu  bahawa  Anwar tidak bersalah, lalu mengarahkan beliau dibebaskan dan dilepaskan.

Segera saya membaca semula skrip kisah "Sang Kancil" dengan penuh minat dan dengan interpretasi yang berbeza; khususnya selepas menerima e-mel daripada Ann Lee dan Kathy Rowland pada hari berkenaan berkaitan keputusan kes di mahkamah.

Monolog "Hang Li Poh – Melakan Princess" ditulis dan diarahkan oleh Ann Lee pada 8-14 Julai 1998 serta menampilkan Mew Chang Tsing sebagai pelakon tunggal memegang lapan watak.

Skrip berkenaan kini sedang dalam proses terjemahan untuk dipersembahkan di Indonesia kepada khalayak yang lebih besar. Malah, beberapa teater yang diusahakan Kuali Works turut mendapat pengiktirafan antarabangsa.

Teater "From Table Mountain to Teluk Intan" lebih berupa kisah diri Shahimah (Charmaine W) Idris, wanita Melayu kelahiran Cape Town, Afrika Selatan yang ditikam di tempat letak kereta di Kuala Lumpur pada 1997.

`Nostalgia zaman kanak-kanak'

Kisah itu pertama kali dipentaskan di Kuala Lumpur pada 2-21 Oktober 2000. Kemudian turut dipentaskan pada New York International Fringe Festival pada 15-21 Ogos 2002.

"Tarap Man" yang dipentaskan di Kuala Lumpur pada 5-9 Disember 2007 sekali lagi menggunakan latar negeri Sabah. Bagaimanapun, teater ini tidak lagi berciri "nostalgia zaman kanak-kanak" seperti "Happy Families".

"Aashi, seorang wartawan kanan, ditukarkan ke Malaysia Timur kerana tidak tunduk pada permintaan sang ketua yang ada motif politik. Dengan berlatarkan negeri kelahiran Ann Lee, teater ini berjaya mengungkapkan ketegangan politik yang wujud antara kerajaan pusat dan kerajaan negeri pada waktu itu," Kathy Rowland menghuraikan.

"Perpustakaan" pula sebuah teater tanpa dialog. Saya masih terbayang-bayang aksi lucu Jo Kukathas yang melakonkan watak pustakawan semasa majlis pelancaran "Sex, Stage & State" tempoh hari!

Di luar daripada lingkungan buku ini, karya-karya yang diterbitkan oleh Kuali Works turut diperkatakan secara akademik dalam pelbagai buku dan jurnal antarabangsa; antaranya "The Routledge Concise History of Southeast Asian Writing in English" (2010) dan "The Drama Review" (2002).

Hasil tulisan Ann Lee turut dimuatkan dalam "Body 2 Body: A Malaysian Queer Anthology" (2009), "March 8: Time for Real Change" (2010) dan "Malaysian Tales: Retold & Remixed" (2011).

`Ratu Sukan'

Bermula dengan pementasan "Colour Blind" karya Karen Kuah pada 1996, Kuali Works yang ditubuhkan pada 1994 sudah menjayakan pementasan 17 teater.

Kathy Rowland yang menulis pengenalan pada buku "Sex, Stage & State" menyebut bahawa syarikat itu juga pernah menerbitkan siri televisyen "Ratu Sukan" sempena 100 tahun pencapaian cemerlang wanita Malaysia dalam bidang sukan.

Dari 1996 hingga 1999, Kuali Works turut menganjurkan siri seminar dan bengkel khas bagi wanita dalam pelbagai bidang seni, termasuk pengurusan kewangan dan penerbitan teater.

Agak malang bahawa pada akhir tahun 2010, Kuali Works terpaksa ditutup atas pelbagai faktor. Namun, walaupun "kuali" sudah ditutup, penulisan sejarah perkembangan teater Malaysia tidak akan lengkap tanpa menyebut nama syarikat itu.

Memiliki senaskhah "Sex, Stage & State" pula umpama memiliki secebis daripada serpihan sejarah itu sendiri yang tidak ternilai harganya.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Bersih kicks off voter turnout campaign

KUALA LUMPUR: Electoral reform watchdog, Bersih 2.0, launched a programme called "Jom 100" to increase voter turnout for the 13th general election.

Bersih 2.0 chairman S Ambiga said: "A 100 percent turnout would strengthen democracy and mitigate gerrymandering and electoral fraud."

At a press conference at the Kuala Lumpur Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall here, she also said that 100 percent voter turnout would allow the people to re-shape the future of Malaysia.

She added that the Jom 100 programme is geared towards educating voters on their rights and importance of casting their voters.

Ambiga also urged overseas-based Malaysian voters to return and vote in the general election.

"If the Election Commission (EC) doesn't make arrangements at the embassies, please come home and vote.

"Some are already looking into that possibility," she said following a High Court decision to dismiss a case by six UK-based Malaysians to compel the EC to allow them to vote as absent voters.

Jom 100 will kick off after the Chinese New Year holidays next week with a focus on rural constituencies. The campaign will start in Kuala Terengganu on Friday.

Ambiga also welcomed the government, political parties and NGOs to jointly embark on this non-partisan campaign.

"We are more than happy if the government enabled people to vote. We welcome political parties to spread the word. We have been in collaboration with other NGOs," she said.

Ambiga, the former Bar Council president, said there are more than three million eligible Malaysians who are not registered voters.

To question, she also did not rule out the possibility of a Bersih 3.0 rally if the demands of Bersih 2.0 are not met before the next general election.

"We are trying all those things – negotiations with the EC, the Parliametary Select Committee (PSC) on election reforms – but if the recommendations are not fulfilled, do not rule out Bersih 3.0," she said.

She also said holding the general election before Bersih's demands are met meant that the government had "no respect for the PSC, Parliament and the people".

Ambiga announced the appointment of national laureate, A Samad Said, as Bersih co-chairman and Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia chairman Ahmad Shukri Razak as Bersih 2.0 committee member.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Pekerja Indonesia dakwa dapat gaji separuh

PETALING JAYA: Seramai 10 pekerja warga Indonesia di Sibu, Sarawak mendakwa majikan membayar separuh dari jumlah gaji yang dijanjikan.

Mereka dijanjikan mendapat gaji sekitar RM 700 sebulan, tetapi kemudian hanya mendapat RM320.

Oleh kerana itu pekerja terbabit memilih untuk lari pulang  ke indonesia.

Ketua bantuan  sosial, tenaga kerja dan transmigrasi daerah Sanggau, Abdul Simamora pekerja berkenaan berkerja di sebuah kilang papan  di Sibu.

"Mereka lari dan tiba di pejabat sosial semalam. Hari ini kami akan antar mereka Kalimantan Barat agar  dipulangkan ke tempat asal," kata Simamora.

Sepuluh pekerja itu berasal dari Situbondo dan Probolinggo, Jawa Timur, lapor Kompas. com.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治

Love your country, vote wisely — Richard Loh (loyarburok.com)

JAN 17 — Malaysians must start to LOVE the right thing and in the right way. My earlier posting, "Love is a Dangerous Game to Play With!" (which can also be found here) highlights, in general, love between two sexes and how it can be good or how it can hurt as well.

Love — A deep, tender, ineffable feeling of affection and solicitude towards a person.

Patriotic — Feeling, expressing, or inspired by love for one's country.

Over the decades of propaganda by the ruling regime, the people are inclined to think that only by loving the ruling government will they be recognised as patriots who love the country — a misconception of loving the government first and nation second.

The second misconception of the people is that the 50-decade-old regime which has begun to think and act like the nation's wealth belongs only to them has the right to do so; the rakyat are their servants to toy with.

The third misconception is that the rakyat must be appreciative and grateful of what the government has done and is doing.

These misconceptions must be promptly eradicated from the rakyat's mind or else the future of this nation will be in ruin.

There can be no love for a ruling government. Governance can only be categorised as, good, poor or bad governance. The rakyat need not be appreciative or grateful to the government for what they are doing, for better or worse, as they are elected and paid for to do their jobs of running the nation.

This nation can and will only be bankrupted or destroyed by those who currently hold power and not the rakyat. Patriotism cannot be questioned by the ruling government — who covered up their wrongdoings — when the rakyat woke up and protested against them.

GE 13 is just round the corner and voters must start grading the performances of  the Umno/BN rule in the past five decades. Leave love and patriotism aside as they cannot be used to gauge the performances of the government. You can love and like PM Najib but keep that personal. The scrutiny must be deep-rooted in long-term results that will benefit the country and rakyat, and not short-term ones or ad hoc giveaways that come once every five years.

This coming general election, voters must be very attentive of the candidates they are going to vote in to form the next government. They must ask a lot of questions and find the answers themselves. For example, why are they giving out one-time RM500 cash to those earning RM3K and below now? Why not look into long-term solutions for those earning RM3k and less, ensuring high purchasing power in the RM3k? Can families own a home and a Kancil and afford regular meals for four with that RM3k?

They say that what goes up must come down, but I do not see this truth in the prices of consumer goods nor the corruption index. What is the ruling government going to do about these issues?

If you are patriotic and love your country, you must make the right choice by voting in a credible, competent and clean government, one with the integrity to treat all Malaysians as equal and with respect. Failing to do so will see in ruin the nation that you love and are patriotic about.

GE 13. Love your country, vote wisely. — loyarburok.com

* This article first appeared here.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read More @ Source



More » Bonology.com | Barisan Nasional (BN) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...