FMT LETTER: From Feizrul Nor Nurbi, via e-mail
I refer to the FMT article, 'Scrap PPSMI, future generations will suffer' by Aziff Azuddin. I was born in the early 80s to a middle class family from a small town in Perak – not exactly a city kid. My parents didn't speak in English at home, but in my early years I manage to pick up English in bits and pieces through the idiot box. Then came kindergarten when I was exposed more to the language.
Entering my school life in late 80s meant I had gone through my schooling years learning all subjects sans English in Bahasa Melayu. In school, from Standard One until Form Five, I was fortunate to be able to learn from English teachers who were passionate and made the lessons interactive and fun. I was certainly lucky in this sense when all around me the quality of English teaching were crumbling and getting worse day after day.
Bear in mind, I studied Math and Science in BM.
So, university life came a-calling, and immediately the medium of instruction was changed to English. I can almost hear your thought, "A-ha! This guy must have struggle!" but evidently, I did not. University life in English was really a breeze for me. Looking back, it was my strong grounding in the English language as taught by my English teachers that gave me the edge. For that I am ever so grateful to them.
So, what am I now? – a software architect working with a US-based MNC, travelling all over Asia Pacific and handling customers the world over from a multitude of cultures and languages.
PPSMI is not the way. Strong English basics certainly is. To obtain that, we need to empower our English teachers and return the fun in learning – speaking, writing, reading. Make our schools conducive for learning, give the students the confidence to converse and articulate their ideas. Give them a strong base to be successful in whatever field that they want to, because as much as we hate to admit it – the world is not solely about Math and Sciences.
A defeatist attitude, you say?
When refering to the Japanese and the Germans, it is not really their language that sets them a part. You referred to an abundance of scientific references and body of knowledge readily available in those languages. But why have not we stopped and ask – "How did they get where they are right now?"
A case can be made of their national identity. It is well known about their determination as a nation, their steely-resolve when faced with the challenge of rising from the destruction of war, their perfectionist trait and for the Germans – they are known for their efficiency.
Above all, they never take short-cuts. They work hard for what they have, and in doing so they have managed to keep intact their language and their culture – even showing some disdain to foreign influences and languages trying to be cocky – never selling out who they are as a people in their pursuit of success.
So, with PPSMI – is it not a short cut? And in taking a short cut, what will that say of us a people of this country? Are we really in a hurry, too hasteful to do the right things the right way?
There's another short-cut project that is reviled by majority of Malaysians which benefits only a select minority, and ironically it starts with the letter 'P' also. It came with grand objectives, with the aim of catapulting Malaysia into the lucrative global automotive industry. Yes, some of you may have guessed it right – its the national car project, Proton. And yes also – it is a short cut.
That has been an unfortunate trait of this country of ours – in our haste to reach where we want to go, we abandon the right things that we should be doing and we do the things that we want wrongly. Another case in point is the NFC scandal which is the talk of the town now.
IMHO, in turning to a short-cut that is PPSMI, we are truly being defeatist and apologetic of the heritage that we have. Instead of building those traits from the ground up, our impatience sees we take the fastrack that will eventually lead to nowhere. Instead of sowing the seeds that will ripen years in the future, our haste sees us resorting to quick-fixes and the proverbial "band-aid" solutions.
Perhaps this is the "3rd world mentality" that Pak Lah was talking about.
Confused
Seemingly, you are confused. And lucky for you and unlucky for me – you are not the only one. Your article laments the fact that English proficiency amongst our graduates and workforce is in the doldrums. But again and again those sharing this lament point to PPSMI as a solution. And my response would always be "Really?"
Why don't you point your fingers at our failure to address the declining quality of English teaching in schools? This is the heart of the problem – when we have engineers unable to converse in English, I say fix their English. When we have graduates failing interviews in English, I say their English is the problem, not their knowledge of whatever major they took in university. When we have Standard One students unable to understand Youtube vids about arithmetics delivered in English – I say empower the kids' English.
But you guys decide to teach Mathematics in English. How ingenious! (that's a sarcastic remark. You can't learn that from learning Math and Science in English)
A different world today
Going through the works of Sir Ken Robinson, a renown expert in creativity, education and the arts, it dawned on me how the education system in place today has outgrown its purpose to serve the needs of the 21st century.
The education system that we have today is based on the needs of the Industrial Age of the 17th and 18th centuries, where men and women were being trained to meet the needs of industries. Therefore what we have now is our schools functioning as mere 'manufacturing lines', feeding the industries with the man power they need. Notably it is not surprising that in serving the needs of the industry, Mathematics and Sciences are deemed as the most importants subjects in schools the world over. And at the bottom, we have the Arts.
But see where this model has taken us – we have loads and loads of people, products of this manufacturing lines, being deprived of their talents and forced to conform. Inherently we have today a largely skilled workforce, albeit a dispassionate and unhappy one.
Have you ever been told off for wanting to be a dancer, a fireman, a footballer, or even a teacher? We are being fed the notion that pursuing these professions will lead to a life wasted. Thus the need to conform to what the society expects of you – engineers, doctors, lawyers.
What we lack now is the passion to do things, and to do the things that we are passionate about. To solve this a paradigm shift is needed – education in its current form have seen its expiry date. Our preoccupation with academic certificates and exam results must shift to wanting to see our children pursue their talents and pursuing the things that they are passionate about.
We always hear the need to be academically successful to meet the demands of the globalised world, but do we realise that those in Standard One today will only join the workforce in 15 years time? How do we plan for something so far off when we cant even say for sure if the world economy as we know it is going bust in the next week or so? Not surpirisng when we see the Europeans in the Eurozone are trying their best to drag the whole world down the abyss with them.
In the words of Sir Ken Robinson – "We should change from the manufacturing line model of education to one that is based on agriculture – where as farmers we sow the seeds and prepare the conditions as best as we could so that the seeds can blossom in ways that they want to".
This is why I see our society's preoccupation with Science and Mathematics points to a way of thinking suited to the Industrial Age of the 18th century, and not for the challenges of the 21st century. We should be better off teaching our kids 'how' to learn instead of 'what' to learn, teaching them to question 'why' and be critical of their surroundings instead of cramming their mind with facts and figures.
We should empower their creativity instead of championing an education system that in every way supresses their creative tendencies. Above all, we as humans should not be made to lose our one ability that separates us from the animals – our ability to think. Long have we produce zombies out of our schools. It is time for change, and change we must.
Also read:
Scrap PPSMI, future generations will suffer
Read More @ Source More »
Bonology.com |
Barisan Nasional (BN) |
Sociopolitics Plus |
大马社会政治