Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

IGP ready to meet Seksualiti Merdeka organisers

KUALA LUMPUR: Inspector-General of Police Ismail Omar is prepared to meet with organisers of the Seksualiti Merdeka 2011 and hear their explanation on the issue.

I dont have a problem meeting them. I am willing to meet anyone, as long as they have an objective because we are talking about peace here.

I dont want to risk anything that might jeopardise peace in the country, he told reporters after attending an Aidiladha function at Masjid Bukit Antarabangsa here today.

In a statement here last night, the programme organisers expressed a wish to meet with Ismail to explain their objective.

They regretted that the public, including the peoples representatives, had chosen to condemn the programme.

Ismail said police would still carry out an investigation as provided for under the law.

On the alleged involvement of former Bar Council president S Ambiga in the programme, Ismail maintained that the police would record her statement and those of the other organisers.

The programme, set for Nov 2 until Nov 13, was to have been held at the Central Markets Annexe Gallery for the fourth time since 2008. It was cancelled after the police banned the functions organised by any group related to it to safeguard public order.

Various parties have also protested against the event which they saw as an attempt to promote lesbianism, homosexuality, bisexuality and transexuality, which they claimed were against societys norm.

No publicity

Meanwhile, Federal Territories and Urban Well-Being Minister Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin said the government will take action against groups which organise functions related to the Seksualiti Merdeka programme here.

He said Kuala Lu! mpur Cit y Hall (DBKL) would periodically monitor the situation to ensure efforts to promote or encourage the programme was brought to a halt.

He said DBKL had the right to take action as such events were not given approval.

If it is carried out at business premises, we can confiscate the premises, and if its held in public, we can take action against the organiser, he said.

Raja Nong Chik was speaking to reporters at the Perdana Qurban Ceremony 2011 in Jalan Klang Lama here today.

He said although such programmes were carried out annually since 2008, DBKL had not received complaints as there was no publicity on the matter.

Also read:

Seksualiti Merdeka stops all functions

- Bernama


Tunisias Islamist-led government rejects laws to enforce religion

Al Arabiya News
Saturday, 05 November 2011

Tom Heneghan
TUNIS REUTERS

Tunisias Islamist-led government will focus on democracy, human rights and a free-market economy in planned changes to the constitution, effectively leaving religion out of the text it will draw up, party leaders said.

The government, due to be announced next week, will not introduce sharia or other Islamic concepts to alter the secular nature of the constitution in force when Tunisias Arab Spring revolution ousted autocrat Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali in January.

We are against trying to impose a particular way of life, Ennahda leader Rachid Ghannouchi, 70, a lifelong Islamist activist jailed and exiled under previous regimes, told Reuters.

Tunisian and foreign critics of Ennahda, the moderate Islamist party that won 41.7 percent of Tunisias first free election on Oct. 23, have voiced fears it would try to impose religious principles on this relatively secular Muslim country.

Interviews with politicians and analysts revealed a consensus that the new assembly, the first to emerge from the Arab Spring uprisings, will focus on reassuring Tunisian voters, and the foreign tourists and investors vital to its economy.

All parties agreed to keep the first article of the current constitution which says Tunisias language is Arabic and its religion is Islam. This is just a description of reality, Ghannouchi said. It doesnt have any legal implications.

There will be no other references to religion in the constitution. We want to provide freedom for the whole country, said the Islamist leader, who will not take any official role in the new government. The new constitution is due in about a year.

No law to promote faith

Ghannouchis reformist Islamist writings in the 1980s and 1990s helped influence Turk! eys curr ent mix of Islam and democracy, and he said his 22 years of exile in London helped him see the importance of civil society in influencing politics.

Like Turkey, Tunisia had decades of secularist dictatorship before evolving into a democracy where moderate Islamists dubbed Muslim Democrats in a take-off of Europes Christian Democrats have emerged as a strong political force.

Law by itself doesnt change reality, Ghannouchi said at Ennahdas headquarters, a six-story building abuzz with the excitement of open politics after decades of dictatorship.

There shouldnt be any law to try to make people more religious, said Ghannouchi, whose party has pledged to continue to allow alcohol and Western dress here and pursue economic policies favoring tourism, foreign investment and employment.

The Islamist leader said he interprets sharia, the ill-defined and often confusing complex of Islamic teachings and laws, as a set of moral values for individuals and societies rather than a strict code to be applied to a countrys legal system.

Egypt says sharia is the main source of its law, but that didnt prevent (deposed President Hosni) Mubarak from being a dictator, he said, noting the explicit reference to sharia in Cairos constitution.

Potential secularist allies agree

Samir Ben Amor, a leader of the secularist Congress for the Republic party due to join a coalition with Ennahda and another non-religious party, agreed there was no dispute about maintaining the brief reference to Islam in the first article.

He said there was wide agreement among political parties to strengthen democracy in the constitution by referring to international human rights conventions. We want a liberal regime, he said.

Although all parties agreed to defend Tunisian womens rights, some of the most advanced in the Arab world, Ben Amor said they could not agree to some feminists demands to have the countrys liberal Personal Status Code written into the constitution.

No con! stitutio n in the world has that, he explained. These rights would be protected through legislation, he added.

The main area of disagreement seems to be whether Tunisia should opt for a parliamentary system, which Ghannouchi said he preferred after seeing British politics at first hand, or the French-style mix of a directly elected president and parliament preferred by the other parties.

The parliamentary system can lead to political instability and, coming out of a dictatorship, we dont think we can risk that, Ben Amor said.

Radwan Masmoudi, Tunisian-born director of the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy (CSID) in Washington, said last months elections showed the country had opted for an evolutionary revolution that avoided radical changes.

Tunisians agree on almost everything, he said in the CSID office here. They want to keep their identity as Arab and Muslim but not live in a theocracy.

I think Tunisia can pave the way for other Arab countries to build a true democracy that is fully compatible with Islam.

Masmoudi said the realities of coalition parties and the probable need for a two-thirds majority to approve the constitution would force all parties to seek a broad consensus.


Mozilla, Microsoft Withdraw Trust in Malaysian Intermediate CA

By John Ribeiro, IDG News
PCWorld

Mozilla and Microsoft said Thursday they are revoking trust in all certificates issued by Digicert, a Malaysian intermediate certificate authority (CA) , after it was found that it had issued 22 certificates with weak 512-bit keys and missing certificate extensions and revocation information.

The Malaysian company was issued an intermediate CA certificate in July, 2010 by Entrust in Dallas, Texas, which was licensed for distribution with SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and S/MIME (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) certificates.

Entrust said in a bulletin on its website that it had been discovered that Digicert Malaysia has issued certificates with weak 512-bit RSA keys and missing certificate extensions. Entrust has revoked the 512-bit certificates issued by Digicert and made them available to major browser vendors to blacklist if found appropriate, it added.

Digicert in Malaysia does not have any relationship with DigiCert, a CA based in Utah.

Digicert in Malaysia could not be immediately reached for comment. It said on its website that it is at the center of an effective trust model that the Malaysian government is creating to address the issue of information security, and the negative perception about online transactions. The company said it was licensed by the Malaysia government, and its trust solutions are legally recognized under Malaysian law.

Entrust said it will revoke the intermediate CA certificate on or before Tuesday, to give Digicert Malaysias customers a modest amount of time to replace their SSL server certificates. Entrust has meanwhile made the intermediate certificate available to the browser vendors for blacklisting.

The certificates in question were issued to a mix of Malaysian government websites and internal systems, Mozilla s! aid in i ts security blog. We do not believe other sites are at risk, it added.

Mozilla is revoking trust in all certificates issued by Digicert in Malaysia, while clarifying that it was not a Firefox specific issue, and the update will be in Firefox 8 and Firefox 3.6.24. Mozilla said the issue was reported to it by Entrust.

Firefox 3.6.24 is scheduled for release on Nov. 8 while Firefox 8 will release on Nov. 17, according to Mozilla.

Microsoft will revoke trust in Digicert Malaysia in an update to be released through Windows Update. said Jerry Bryant, group manager, response communications for Trustworthy Computing at the company, in a blog post.

There is no indication that any certificates were issued fraudulently, however, these weak keys have allowed some of the certificates to be compromised, Bryant said. The compromised certificates could allow an attacker to impersonate the legitimate owner thus making the user believe they are trusting a website or signed software that was created for malicious use, he added.

There is no evidence that the Digicert Malaysia certificate authorities have been compromised, Entrust said.

Close to 300,000 unique IP addresses from Iran requested access to google.com using a rogue certificate issued by Dutch CA DigiNotar, according to a report released in September by security firm, Fox-IT. A total of 531 digital certificates were issued for domains that included google.com, the CIA, and Israels Mossad, after a security breach.

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Saturday, 5 November 2011, 10:46 pm and is filed under IT. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.


Laksana reformasi pilihanraya atau hadapi protes rakyat

KUALA LUMPUR: Satu gerakan besar-besaran akan diadakan sebagai amaran kepada Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak sekiranya gagal melakukan proses penambahbaikan pilihan raya sebelum pilihan raya umum diadakan.

Pengerusi Solidariti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM), Badrul Hisham Shaharinberkata jika gesaan itu gagal dipenuhi, pihaknyatidak menolak kemungkinan akan mengadakan protes dengan mobilisasi yang besar sebagai menuntut proses demokrasi pilihan raya yang bersih dan adil.

Badrul yang turut dikenali sebagai Chegubard berkata, gerakan itu sedang dikumpulkan yang terdiri daripada pelbagai badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) dan pertubuhan lain.

Kami bersama teman-teman organisasi yang lain hari ini mewakilirakyat Malaysia keseluruhannya memberi amaran kepada PMbahawa PRU hanya boleh dipanggil setelah proses penambahbaikan prosespilihan raya dilakukan, kata beliau dalam satu sidang mediahari ini.

Beliau yang juga dikenali sebagai CheguBard berkata beliau merujukkepada janji Najib selepas Himpunan Bersih 2.0 September lalu dimana beliau mengumumkan pembentukan sebuah Jawatankuasa TerpilihParlimen untuk mengkaji perkara ini.

Bagaimanapun, CheguBard melahirkan kebimbangan dengan beberapamaklumat yang diterima bahawa Najib bakal membubarkanparlimen pada 11 September ini sebelum sebarang penambahbaikandiimplementasikan.

Sementara itu, Pengerusi Gerakan Kebebasan Sivil Malaysia (MCLM) HarisIbrahim menyatakan jika ini bukan kesnya, Najib sebagaiPerdana Menteri dan Pengerusi Barisan Nasional harus menyatakanpendirian beliau dan berterus-terang dengan rakyat.

Jika benar (parlimen dibubar November) ini. Kita lihat ini sebagaisatu lagi langkah Umno dan Barisan Nasional untukmempertahanka! n kuasa di peringkat pusat dan negeri dengan cara yangtidak betul dan menafikan hak majoriti rakyat yang mahukanperubahan, kata beliau.

Justeru beliau meminta para wartawan bertanya soalan tersebutsekembalinya Najib dari menunaikan haji pada 9 November ini.

Turut hadir bersama CheguBard dan Haris ialah wakil Parti RakyatMalaysia Dr Rohana Ariffin, wakil Parti Keadilan Kaum India, PSJennapala dan wakil Liga Graduan Tiada Pekerjaan Devadas Silvaraju.


Nazri talking through his hat!

By P. Ramakrishnan, Alirans President
4 Nov 2011

Nazri has given expression to the saying, Talking through the hat! That was what he was doing when he rather foolishly commented on the majority decision of the Court of Appeal which ruled in a landmark case that Section 15(5)(a) of the Universities and University Colleges Act was unconstitutional.

In spite of the Court of Appeals ruling, for the Minister of Law to insist that it does not invalidate the Act and to dismiss the Courts decision as an opinion in passing is appalling and shocking, exposing his alarming ignorance of the judicial process.

Section 15(5)(a) has been invalidated as unconstitutional by the Court of Appeal ruling which means that the provisions of that section are no longer applicable and cannot be enforced. That section, as a result of the Courts decision, is void and invalid.

It is a binding decision and cannot be dismissed merely as an opinion of the Court without any consequence. Until and unless the Federal Court overturns or sets aside this ruling thus upholding the High Court decision no power on earth professing the democratic tradition can ignore this decision. It is as simple as that!

It is extremely disturbing that the Minister for Law has shown scant respect for the judicial process by not taking the Court decision seriously. His dismissive remarks mock our judiciary and he himself comes across as a bumbling clown.

This is law, passed by us as lawmakers. There must be separation of powers, he thundered. If he respects the separation of powers, then he must not poke his nose where it does not belong!

The judiciary has an inherent independent authority conferred by the Federal Constitution to act without fear or favour (and) discharge their grave responsibility of pronouncing judgment on the validity of executive and legislative acts and on the meaning of any provision of the federal and state cons! titution s as clearly expounded by the late Tun Mohamed Suffian.

According to Tun Suffian, Courts have the power to pronounce on the validity of legislative acts and to interpret the Constitution.

When great minds have given their considered opinion, it is futile to split hairs.

Perhaps Nazri, as he is prone to be so vocal, can help us in clarifying what is deemed as a contradiction.

Is there a contradiction in the UUCA in that it doesnt seem to be applicable to all the university students?

Why is it that the UUCA is only applicable to students of local universities? Why are students of overseas universities exempted from this Act?

And the more pertinent question is: Why do almost all nations espousing democratic traditions refrain from subjecting their university students to such restrictions as spelt out in our UCCA?

How is it that Umno Club members comprising overseas students are permitted to attend the Umno General Assembly regularly? Arent they also violating the provisions of this Act which state no student shall express or do anything which may reasonably be construed as expressing support or sympathy with or opposition to any political party in or outside Malaysia?

These Umno Club members openly express their support for Umno and by doing so, dont they fall foul of this Act? Or is it a case of selective application?

Now that the Court had ruled, these Umno Club members henceforth can legitimately attend Umno General Assemblies, something that was not right previously.

Print Friendly

This entry was posted on Saturday, 5 November 2011, 2:00 pm and is filed under Constitution, Human Rights, university. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...