"But while one man standing in the road is a nuisance, a mere distraction, 10 men standing together are far harder to ignore. And if those 10 become 100, a thousand, a million, a billion even, they become a force so big, so strong and so united in their common cause that those who espouse hatred will face a very simple choice." : Prime Minister Najib Razak's Oxford speech - 17th May 2011
Wednesday, September 28, ! 2011
Of wet dream, nightmare and Marty McFly
I have not seen the Buku Jingga, let alone read it. I wonder what Pakatan Rakyat says about hudud. Or whether Pakatan Rakyat says anything about it at all.
Whatever public posturing Pakatan Rakyat puts up in relation to hudud, everybody knows that in hudud resides an issue within Pakatan Rakyat which is potentially explosive and may ultimately be destructive. Everybody knows that. Pakatan Rakyat knows that. And Tun Dr Mahathir, unfortunately to Pakatan Rakyat, also knows that.
While the Barisan Nasional, particularly UMNO, was busy trying to out-manoeuvre Mat Sabu in history 101 and the Prime Minister eagerly venturing into a state of coolness and sempoi-neity, Tun Dr Mahathir had other ideas. His was a meister stroke of all political strokes in Malaysia. Thats because he knows what hurts the most as well as when and where to execute the hurting blow.
So, in an interview one day he threw a seemingly harmless challenge to PAS. PAS has always maintained that he (Tun DrM) was the reason why it could not implement hudud in Kelantan. Tun DrM then asked why hasnt PAS written to Prime Minister Najib to implement hudud as he (Tun DrM) is now no more the PM.
Those of you who of my generation will remember the character Marty McFly from the Back to the Future trilogy to digress, I wonder when Hollywood is going to remake this film apart from the totally cool and sempoi DeLorean DMC-12 in the movie. Marty boy was a smart kid. Very nice and mild-mannered boy. Quite cool and level headed too. That was until the antagonist started calling him chicken. Upon being called chicken, Marty McFly would lose all his good manners and level-headedness. He would turn reckless and completely berserk. He would even do really stupid things.
Tun DrM knew all the while that hudud is to PAS and Tuan Guru Nik Aziz what chicken was to Marty McFly. Me! ntion th e word hudud and Tuan Guru Nik Aziz would instantly go ape and all bananas. The whole PAS would grimace in orgasmic pleasure like a 13 year old after his first wet dream. That would in turn be a nightmare for Pakatan Rakyat. In Pakatan Rakyat, DAPs stand on hudud is clear. DAP is against hudud. As for PKR, well, it depends on what day the issue is raised and on which side of the bed Anwar Ibrahim wakes up that day.
TDM knows very well that hudud will cause Pakatan Rakyat to lose its pakatan. His challenge was a calculated move to throw Pakatan Rakyat into shambles. That was exactly what had happened after his challenge.
TGNA firstly dismissed as laughable suggestions by TDM that Kelantan can now implement hudud now that TDM has retired. He then challenged the present Prime Minister to withdraw Putrajayas objection to the implementation of hudud in Kelantan. If TGNA was politically savvy, he would have stopped there.
No, he did not.
TGNA then continued to meet with Prof Aziz Bari and Dr Dzulkefli Ahmad on 25th September 2011 to discuss the implementation of hudud in Kelantan and gave assurance that hudud will only affect Muslims and will not be imposed on non-Muslims. (the full report is here).
DAP, quite expectedly, responded. Karpal went into amok mode. Lim Guan Eng, meanwhile, said that the partys entire Central Executive Committee would resign from their position in the party if hudud was ever included in Pakatan Rakyats Common Policy Framework or Buku Jingga.
The Star newspaper of course saw this as an opportunity. On 25th September it apparently reported what Guan Eng said above. However on 26th September, the Star apparently modified the news to report that Guan Eng had threatened the resignation of the DAPs leadership from Pakatan Rakyat.
The water gets even murkier when Anwar Ibrahim, quite recklessly (politically) said th! at he su pports the Kelantan State Governments move to implement hudud (see here for the report). He later clarified his statement saying that all decisions affecting the people will have to be based on consensus within Pakatan Rakyat. He was quoted as saying:
We hold firm to the conviction that any issue which affects the interest of the people must be discussed frankly in a civilized manner with the objective of seeking an amicable resolution.
That statement actually does not add or detract to what he had earlier said, namely, that he thinks hudud can be implemented in Kelantan. This was what he said earlier:
For now, in general, in principle, I believe this can be implementedIt is a specific area that affects Muslims and does not impeach rights of non-Muslims. The proceeding makes sure that administration of justice is guaranteed. "
By then a full storm was brewing within Pakatan Rakyat. PAS was again, showing its true colours.
I have always maintained that PAS could never shirk its aspiration for an Islamic State, namely, a state which is based on and run in accordance with the Shariaah laws and regulations. That has always been PAS drum beat and no amount of political posturing or word-spinning could hide that fact.
In recent times, PAS has added the Negara Kebajikan (welfare state) to its wordy armoury. This is all well and good, if not for TGNAs and PAS recent hudud posture. TGNA could and would have done really well against Tun DrMs harmless statement had he stuck to the welfare state agenda. But as I had said earlier, hudud is to TGNA and PAS what chicken was to Marty McFly.
This episode clearly shows that Pakatan Rakyat is full of inconsistent interests and ideologies. And the people within PR are prone to making reactive and self-destructive political statements or moves. That Pakata! n Rakyat , especially PAS and DAP, managed to throw themselves into the large political hole that Tun DrM had dug right in front of them is almost comical.
To cap it up, PR then imposed a gag order against making or issuing any statement on the hudud issue until a meeting of top leaders scheduled to take place soon. Has Pakatan Rakyat ditched its own freedom of speech agenda? Or does Pakatan Rakyat now believe that its leaders are not capable of engaging each other on an important issue in a civil and rational manner? Which is which? Will the real Pakatan stand up please?
Amidst all these political gimmickry overdrives, the Prime Minister, fresh from scoring major political points after his announcement on the eve of Malaysia Day recently, made another major impact on the non-Muslim citizenry as well as urban Muslims, when he quickly announced that the Barisan Nasional will not implement hudud.
It is a brave announcement. It takes a whole lot of guts to say so, especially in current UMNO/Malaysia political climate where race and religion issues are championed by everybody from the likes of Zulkifli Noordin to Ibrahim Alis PERKASA.
That statement leaves Pakatan Rakyat and especially Anwar Ibrahim looking lame.
It is a calculated and clever statement. Politically the Prime Minister gave nothing and gained everything by saying so. PAS, TGNA and Anwar could have said so too. The reason is simple. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic-faiths society. Its Parliament is not filled with Muslim MPs only. It is filled with Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and various other mixture of faiths and races.
Any move by any party to amend the Constitution in order to implement the Shariaah or hudud will require a two-third majority to succeed. If such move is made, it is certain that for the first time in Malaysian Parliamentary history, Members of Parliament will vote in accordance with their respective belief and faith. ! Which me ans, it will also be the first time MPs will not be cowed to vote in accordance with their partys whip or wish. That will also mean that for the first time ever, we will witness a clear separation in our Parliament of MPs voting along racial and religious line.
It will be THAT divisive.
To me, hudud is a Constitutional impossibility. It will remain impossible until two-third of the membership of our Parliament is filled not only by Muslim MPs, but by Muslim MPs who actually wish to implement hudud.
By doing that too, we will effectively be surrendering this country to the ulamaks and mullahs, upon whose hands syariaah compliant laws and regulations will be entrusted.
Just as we now entrust what is halal to eat, drink, wear and use to JAKIM.
I may be mistaken here but I thought the issue is recently raised first by Nik Aziz, not TDM. It started with the statistics that was announced that Kelantan is among the states with the highest case of HIV found. When asked to comment, Nik Aziz said that this would have not been the case had Hudud been implemented in Kelantan which he then blamed TDM for blocking it. Presumably, the 'harsh' sentence of Hudud for drug pusher (I wonder what could be worse than hanging under the present law) would act as an effective deterrent. So naturally the press went to TDM for his reaction - which you have referenced. TDM does not make the statement unprovoked, just being naughty! - he wa s merely defending himself in his trademarked sarcasm. I don't think he is that brilliant to expect Nik Aziz to be so stupid as to drag PR to the brink of breakup - or at least giving a lot of party leaders much headache.
You are not alone in this 'Mahathir starts it first' story. I found it also in Malaysiakini, Sin Chew and many other places. I think you guys are giving Mahathir too much credit.
- 28 September 2011 15:17
About MeArt Harun believes that he is a failed government experiment, abandoned and left alone to roam the streets after all remedial efforts yielded no positive result. He calls himself a non-governmental organism, practices law for a living and tries very hard to play guitar, sing, race cars and write some stuffs to stay alive.
My complete profile.
My Twitter ID - Art_Harun
All Rights Reserved
- It shows that Malaysians are observing the agreements they have signed without trying to retaliate in other directions, such as water, whi...
- I must admit of being astounded by the claim by Professor Datuk Dr Zainal Kling that Tanah Melayu had never been colonised by the British, s...
- Mat Sabu is charged today for criminal defamation. I have not read the exact charge. However from various reports, apparently! he is c harge...
- There is a moment I spent with the late Raja Aziz Addruse which will forever be etched in my memory. It was one Sunday morning at Rajus PJ...
- Need I say more? *thank you to Shirzad Lifeboat who shares this on fb.
- I dont know whether I am supposed to cry, laugh, jump for joy, do a poco-poco or just polish my shoes. But, according to a Malaysian Insid...
- This is the story of the human spirit. Sad, ugly, vicious and violent. And yet it is so beautiful and inspiring. Somewhere out there, G...
- ARTiculations deman! ds a ful l and unreserved apology. Now!
- I have not seen the Buku Jingga, let alone read it. I wonder what Pakatan Rakyat says about hudud. Or whether Pakatan Rakyat says anything a...
- Dear Ezam, With reference to your manic and almost maniacal spewing of hatred last Friday, I just have this to say to you. You are an emba...
- 1 Sentence(6)
- Abdullah Badawi(3)
- Death in custody(5)
- Guest Writer(7)
- Human Rights(50)
- Islam; Quran(7)
- Islamic History(5)
- Journalistic Freedom(6)
- Mainstream Media(12)
- Politics; UMNO!
- Prime Minister(2)
- Quran; Campaign(3)
- The Economy(13)
- The Malays(14)
- The Police(23)
- The Rulers(6)
- Thursday jottings
- The Unwanted
- The Tipping Point
- Dear Brother Anas,
- Malaysia is under 4 states of emergency, mind you!...
- Oh lawdplease dont let me be misunderstood
- Democracy and freedom of expression
- My creative thoughts on the FB pages with unquanti...
- What were you saying again, YB Datuk Zulkifli Noor...
- Harun bin Mahmud
- The Failure of Our Institutions
- Septem! ber< span dir="ltr">(11)