Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Warganegara Bangla penyelamat BN,terima kasih Hasina...

Najib patut berasa malu teramat sangat apabila Perdana Menteri Bangladesh , Sheikh Hasina Wajed mendedahkan betapa pincangnya sistem pilihanraya ala-Malaysia yang sanggup memperalatkan rakyat luar, termasuk Bangladesh yang mencari pekerjaan di negara ini dengan tawaran status kewarganegaraan dan layak mengundi.

Bernarkah ramai pekerja-pekerja Bangladesh di Malaysia diberi kewarganegaraan dengan mudah asalkan mengundi parti yang mewakili kerajaan pemerintah?


Ini bukan Mat Bangla yang cakap, tapi Perdana Menteri Bangladesh sendiri , Sheikh Hasina Wajed yang buat kenyataan. Kenyataan tersebut dipetik dari www.ngoab.gov.bd laman rasmi hal ehwal badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) Jabatan Perdana Menteri negara itu yang kini sudah kena gula-gula hack!


Najib tidak boleh main arah Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof, Pengerusi SPR untuk menafikan tuduhan yang berat ini sebagaimna penafian yang dibuatnya apabila Pakatan Rakyat banyak kali menunjukan bukti mengadu tentang adanya kes seumpama tersebut.

Tetapi kali ini, kenyataan dari seorang Perdana Menteri Bangladesh , jelas membuktikan adanya gejala tersebut sehingga beliau begitu berani membuat kenyataan mengenainya.PM Najib kena jawab sendiri kenyataan rakan sejawatnya itu!


Kita masih tertunggu-tunggu reaksi Najib, PM Malaysia untuk menafikan bahawa perkara yang didakwa oleh pemimpin tertinggi dari sebuah negara adalah pembohongan, fitnah bodoh dan semata-mata satu usaha jahat cuba menjatuhkan kedaulatan negara ini yang baru saja menyambut Hari Kemerdekaan ke-54, wala! upun tid ak pernah dijajah.


Demi kedaulatan agama, bangsa dan negara, setidak-tidaknya, Najib kena panggil Duta Bangladesh mengadapnya atau suruh sahaja Rosmah menalipon Sheikh Hasina ....
alhusseyn

source:alhusseyn51.blogspot.com

Patriot Bangla di atas kot bakal jadi calon Ketua Pemuda.....

cheers.

Milestones -- Blogger Rockybru and PM Najib

Rockybru who went from MSM to new media and then back to MSM -- the last at the Malay Mail's helm -- is back again in new media. Now he's helming THE M:O:L:E, and its first socalled news break is the following. Frankly as a newsman -- like rockybru on a smaller scalle, having traversed MSM and online media over three decades taking into account 13 years at diplomatic media -- I would say of the lates t report on DAP politician ex[pressinghis personal opinion in calling for a new flag to replace the Jalur Gemilang, is "NO BIG NEWSBREAK"!

You judge for yourself also Datuk Ahirudin Attan'sssssss slef analysis:

This Blog
Linked From Here
Abroad
Entertainment
News On-Line
Sports
[So-Po Anonymous]
[Journo-Bloggers]
Politicians
Photo
[Bloggers Directory]
R.I.P
[Socio-Political]
CEO's Blogs
Business & The Economy
Special Interest Blogs
This Blog
Linked From Her! e
< /div>

Abroad

Entertainment

News On-Line

Sports

[So-Po Anonymous]

[Journo-Bloggers]

Politicians

Photo

[Bloggers Directory]

R.I.P

[Socio-Political]

CEO's Blo! gs

Business & The Economy

Special Interest Blogs

Loading...

Saturday, September 17, 2011

The Mole's first "kill"

Killed: Pakatan Rakyat's plan to replace our flag..
Er, actually, it was DAP's rep Manoharan who declared on his Facebook that Pakatan Rakyat, the coalition of 3 parties including the predominantly Chinese DAP, will come up with a new flag. Why? In his own words:


Yes, I was wondering what his poison was, too. Not toddy, I'm sure.

The MOLE, on its first day as Malaysia's blogpaper, was alerted to Mano's madness and it sprang into action to do what it promises to do:

first, we called Mano to verify that the Facebook Mano was indeed him, the Hindraf leader backed by DAP in the last GE. Then we asked our friends from Pakatan if it's true, that Pakatan Rakyat will come up with a new flag because the existing Jalar Gemilang sucks?
Kudos to YB Tian Chua, who is the Info Chief of PKR, who responded to my twitter to him:



Was it the toddy talking, then?

The Mole was widely-quoted in the MSM (see screenshots) and on cyberspace.We hope to get an official Pakatan response and if the coalition (or DAP) plans to take any action against Mano. I think re-education is best, and maybe a rehab course, but I'm just thinking aloud.





Thank you to @dhanyraam of Penang for alerting The Mole.


The Economist says well done Najib but

The Malaysian Insider
Sep 17, 2011

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 17 The influential international newspaper The Economist has praised Datuk Seri Najib Razak for his move to repeal the Internal Security Act (ISA) and other controversial security laws but points out that he will have to abolish institutionalised ethnic discrimination before he can assume the mantle of a radical reformer.

The extreme right-wing of Umno is expected to go along with the sweeping legislative changes as long as it does not touch on ethnic quotas and divisions, the newspaper said in an opinion published in its popular Banyan column yesterday.

It is the system of ethnic quotas and divisions that is really holding the country back if Mr Najib started to take an axe to all that, then absolutely nobody would question his credentials as a radical reformer, the newspaper wrote.

The Economist noted that the reforms announced on the eve of Malaysia Day could further transform the image of Najib from grey, indecisive technocrat to progressive democrat, or so his supporters hope.

Some analysts say his plans to speed up reforms to retake middle Malaysia could still hurt Barisan Nasionals (BN) chances in the next general election because some conservatives may feel alienated.

Najib had said on Thursday in a televised address that the ISA and Emergency Ordinance, both of which allow for indefinite detention without trial, would be repealed and replaced by two new laws for use mainly against suspected terrorists.

The international media has responded with measured praise to the prime ministers efforts to assume the reformist mantle with the Wall Street Journal also pointing out yesterday that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahims sodomy trial continues to cast a pall over Najibs bid to become a reformer.

Newspapers like the Wall Street Journal and T! he Econo mist had flayed the Najib administration over its handling of Bersihs July 9 rally where tens of thousands were dispersed by water cannons and tear gas in chaotic scenes that resulted in nearly 1,700 arrested, scores injured and one ex-soldier dead.

An article in The Economist attacking the heavy-handed police action against Bersih activists was even censored by government officials here.

But Najibs speech on Thursday has now gained slightly more positive coverage in The Economist, with yesterdays Banyan column describing the repeal of the ISA a most welcome measure.

If all these laws are indeed repealed and changes implemented, then the political landscape in Malaysia might look very different in a few years time, and Mr Najib will be able to claim a lot of credit for that.

The newspaper added however that the opposition will also feel vindicated, although they will worry that Mr Najib has swiped many of their most distinctive campaign promises at the next election.

But The Economist pointed out that Najibs biggest challenge would still be ethnic quotas.

Some on the extreme Malay wing of the party grumble that all this reform stuff is going too far, but they will go along with it as long as it does not touch on the most profound sources of oppression and grievance in the country, the institutionalised ethnic discrimination that privileges Malays over the countrys other races, mainly Chinese and Indians.


Will repeal of ISA and slew of other legislative changes be completed before next general elections or will they be work-in-progress trotted out as BN election goodies ?

I had said at the Sabah Pakatan Rakyat convention in Kota Kinabalu last evening that the Pakatan Rakyat has begun to chalk up victories even before the 13th general elections, citing as example the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razaks announcement to repeal the Internal Security Act (ISA) which is one of the specific promises made by Pakatan Rakyat in the Buku Jingga manifesto.

This has been quickly rebutted by Najib today who said that no one else but Barisan Nasional should take credit for the repeal of the ISA and the slew of other law reforms which he announced in his Malaysia Day message on Wednesday night.

Najib claimed that these are not the fruits of their struggle but was a decision made by the Barisan Nasional government because we listened to Malaysians who want this change.

Najib even said the decision to scrap the ISA was part of his promise to amend the controversial law when he took office in 2009.

Not to mention Malaysians at large but even leaders and members of Barisan Nasional parties would require enormous capacity of self-deception to believe such tall tales.

If Najibs is to be believed, that the repeal of the ISA and the removal of other draconian laws had been in the works since April 2009 when he became Prime Minister, then Najibs announcements on Malaysia Day eve should mark the final step in government review and reform of oppressive laws and its readiness to fully implement them when Parliament meets on October 3, tabling all necessary legislative changes for parliamentary sanction.

But is this the case?

Clearly not or the Minister in the Prime Ministers Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz would not have said that there was not enough time to repeal the ISA in the October sitting of parliament and that the draft replacement laws would be tabled during the next meeting in March.

This is because the change of heart to repeal the ISA and remove other draconian measures is not the result comprehens! ive revi ew of draconian laws in the past 28 months after he became Prime Minister in April 2009, but the result of electoral pressures after the catastrophic loss of public confidence in his leadership, both nationally and internationally, from the disastrous government mishandling of the 709 Bersih 2.0 peaceful rally for free and fair elections in Malaysia.

In fact, if the repeal of the ISA and the removal of other draconian laws in the country had been actively and seriously reviewed and pursued in the highest government and political circles since Najib became Prime Minister in April 2009, the arrogant, ham-fisted, high-handed and mindless repression and clampdown on the Bersih 2.0 campaign such as the unjustified PSM arrests under Emergency Ordinance, ridiculous arrests for wearing Berish 2.0 T-shirts or just wearing yellow, would not have taken place.

Najib has only himself to blame for the skepticism and cynicism about his sincerity, commitment and steadfastness to democratic, electoral and legal reforms because of his own record as PM since April 2009.

All patriotic and right-thinking Malaysians want the ISA and all draconian and repressive laws to be removed from the statute books but can Najib be trusted to walk the talk of his public promises?

Najib must not deride but sincerely address the sea of doubts and questioning about his commitment and resolve to introduce a more open and democratic environment in Malaysia, upholding human rights, a free and responsible press, as well as the principles of accountability, transparency and integrity?

Five questions which demand answer from Najib are:

1. Will the repeal of ISA and slew of other legislative changes be completed before next general elections or will they be work-in-progress trotted out as BN election goodies?

2. Will the replacements for the repeal or removal of repressive laws and measures result in the reincarnation of these very same draconian features in a new format, e.g. repeal of ISA but enac! tment of new law which could be described as ISA2?

3. What Najib announced on Wednesday does not satisfy the definition of Political Transformation Programme for Malaysia. Will he support the repeal of all other restrictive and draconian laws including the Universities and University Collegs Act, Sedition Act and the Official Secrets Act.

4. Is Najib prepared to repeal all provisions in the statute books which undermine the doctrine of the separation of powers such as excluding judicial review of executive decisions.

5. Will Najib support a motion in Parliament to ratify international human rights conventions, in particular the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights?


PAS youth lodge police reports against professor

PETALING JAYA: The PAS youth will be lodging police reports nationwide on claims by an academician who said Malaysia was never colonised by the British .

Calling the announcement shocking, PAS youth chief Nasrudin Tantawi called upon the authorities to charge the professor under Section 505 of the Penal Code for issuing a statement that could jeopardise public order.

His statement also automatically has rendered the sacrifices of our past freedom fighters such as Mat Kilau, Dato Bahaman, Tok Janggut, Rosli Dobi and Dol Said invalid, said Nasrudin in a statement.

On September 9, the National Professors Council member Zainal Kling shocked Malaysians by saying that Malaysia was never colonised by British .

In his argument, Zainal said that the British merely served as a protectorate to the country, then known as Malaya.

In his criticism against Zainal, Nasrdin said said that the professor had also insulted the Rulers for indirectly insinuating that the latter did nothing to curb British dominance in the country.

He added that the statement also meant that Malaysians were duped into believing that the country received independence on August 31, 1957.

If we were not under imperial power, why would the government then spend so much of taxpayers money to celebrate our independence day on Aug 31 annually? asked Nasrudin.

When contacted, PAS youth information chief Suhaizan Kaiat said that the youth members have filed police reports in Johor Bahru, Gelang Patah, Bakri and Batu Pahat so far.


TNB plans to raise RM1 billion bond issue

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysias national power producer Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) is contemplating raising funds from the bond market soon.

President and CEO Datuk Seri Che Khalib Mohd Noh said: If the gas shortage problem continues, we may have to go to the market in one or two months to raise the fund for our working capital.

It could be RM1 billion, he told Bernama in an interview.

The shortage of gas compels TNB to spend an additional RM3 billion on alternative fuels for power generation this year.

We are talking about a minimum of RM10 million a day extra due to the gas shortage, said Che Khalib, adding that TNB could not be shouldering this heavy burden alone.

He has presented the companys case to the Energy, Green Technology and Water Ministry and hopes to receive the outcome by end of September.

We have to wait for recommendations by the Energy Commission to the Economic Council. Hopefully, we can get the decision by then, he said.

He said TNB would understand that the volume of gas would be reduced if there was maintenance for Petronas facilities, but even on days when theres no maintenance for Petronas facilities, the volume also remains low.

We are not getting what we are supposed to be getting from the power sector, which is 1,250 million standard cu ft per day (mmscfd) for this year. We can consider ourselves lucky if we can get 1,000 mmscfd or 1,050 mmscfd, but in many days we get below 1,000 mmscfd, he said.

Che Khalib said due to the shortage of gas, Tenaga had no option but to use distillate since the last four to five months for some of its gas-fired power plants, causing an increase of 30-40 per cent in the maintenance cost of the plants.

The number of breakdowns has also increased. The maintenance cycle has to be shortened as using distillate shortens the life of our machines particularly.

The interval is getting shorter and shorter.

Our worry is, if this prolongs, well come to a point where all machines need to be mai! ntained at the same time. Then, well have a serious problem.

To do a major overhaul of a gas plant will cost RM150-RM200 million and a normal overhaul will cost RM30-RM40 million, he said.

On the companys financial performance, Che Khalib said the fourth quarter would be very bad after recording a loss of RM440 million for its third quarter.

There will be a little profit for the full year as we have the advantage of the first two quarters. The loss for the third quarter and the fourth, which will be bad, will erode the profits registered for the first two quarters, he said.

Tenaga reported net profit of RM3.197 billion for its 2010 financial year.

If you are talking about RM300-RM400 million a month (to buy distillate) of additional costs, no organisation can sustain, Che Khalib added.

-Bernama


Would the ISA be reborn under two new Laws?

PETALING JAYA: Pakatan Rakyat welcomed repeal of the Internal Security Act (ISA), but was wary of the two new laws that will take the Acts place.

Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim said he supported the repeal of the ISA, but wanted to know what the two new security laws would entail.

We welcome whatever announcement that (goes for) the repeal of the ISA. We welcome (Prime Minister) Najib Tun Razaks step in doing so.

But we need to be cautious, because the cancellation (of that law) Najib will introduce two news laws, and we dont know what they are, Anwar said in a press conference at PKRs headquarters here.

On Thursday, Najib announced in a televised speech that the ISA, along with three Emergency proclamations, would be abolished.

He said that the Act would be replaced by two anti-terrorism laws to suit todays security climate, in the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

However, the premier did not elaborate on the exact nature of these laws, leaving many to speculate on their respective powers.

A two-time ISA detainee himself, Anwar said that there was a possibility that the ISA could be reborn under the two new laws.

The principle of the ISA is a writ of habeus corpus the right for an accused to appear in court, is denied. If there is a new law that suggests the same principles, the name may be different, but the meaning is still the ISA, he said.

Anwar said that the ISA was initially drafted by the federal government during the 60s to combat the communist terrorist threat.

However, the PKR supremo said that its original function has been misused to target the governments political opponents.

Detained in 1974 and later on in 1998, Anwar claimed that he was not looking for compensation over his arrests in the past. I we! nt throu gh that, (I have) no regrets, he said.

In an unrelated matter, the Opposition Leader said that Pakatan Rakyat was looking into the allegation that Bangladeshi nationals were being made citizens, and subsequently given voting rights.

We are looking for further confirmation, because that statement was a valid statement made on the Bangladeshi government website, he said.

A statement posted on the NGO Affairs Bureau of the Bangladesh Prime Ministers Office website said that PM Sheikh Hasina met with her Malaysian counterpart last year.

They allegedly discussed various issues, including the legalisation of foreign Bangladeshi workers in Malaysia.

The website also added that some of these workers, after given citizeship, were given voters rights.

This is strange, because there are many in Malaysia who find it difficult to register (as voters), need a special campaign, and all sorts of administration problems that make it difficult for people to register.

But Bangladeshis can be given the ability (to vote), he said, adding that he was looking to friends confirm if the allegations were indeed true.

On the other hand, Anwar accepted the possibility that the Bangladeshi website may have been hacked, but reasoned that if it had, an accompanying statement would have been released by now.


UBS trader charged with $2 billion fraud

LONDON: UBS trader Kweku Adoboli wept in a London court as he was charged with fraud and false accounting dating back to 2008, a day after the Swiss bank was plunged into crisis by revealing a US$2 billion trading loss.

Adoboli,31, wiped away tears as he was accused of two counts of false accounting, and one count of fraud by abuse of position.

The charges state that while working as a senior trader in UBS Global Synthetic Equities, Adoboli dishonestly abused that position intending thereby to make a gain for yourself, causing losses to UBS or to expose UBS to risk of loss.

Adoboli, the son of a retired United Nations employee from Ghana, attended school and university in Britain and joined UBS in 2006 three years after graduating. He spoke only to confirm his name and address and will be held until September 22 when he will appear again in the same court.

They are extremely serious charges, said magistrate Carolyn Wagstaff.

Britains financial watchdog, the FSA, and its Swiss counterpart FINMA launched a probe into the loss, to be conducted by an independent third party. The Swiss bank would pay for the investigation, the FSA said.

The false accounting charges, said to have taken place between October 2008 and December 2009, and January 2010 and September 2011, said Adoboli had falsified an exchange traded fund made or acquired for an accounting purpose and falsified an exchange traded fund transaction and other internal records.

Exchange traded funds are securities that track an index, a commodity or a basket of assets, and trade on an exchange.

Bank in crises

Meanwhile, UBS was in turmoil as ratings agencies warned lax risk management could prompt downgrades and senior executives canceled engagements to meet financial regulators.

Kingsley Napley, which is representing Adoboli, declined to comment. The law firm also advised Nick Leeson, whose $1.4 billion derivatives losses triggered the 1995 collapse of Britains Barings Bank.

Market s! peculati on has centered on the possibility that the UBS loss resulted from the shock decision by the Swiss central bank last week to impose a cap on the red-hot franc, sending the currency plunging and Swiss shares sharply up.

One UBS trader in London said staff were expecting news of more job cuts in the next two weeks as well as zero bonuses.

Britains Financial Services Authority and Switzerlands FINMA markets regulator are both in close contact with UBS.

A senior UBS banker said regular meetings and social events involving senior managers had been canceled, which he presumed was because of crisis management or meetings with regulators.

Analysts said the massive loss, announced on Thursday, was the final nail in the coffin for UBS investment bank which has struggled, like others in the industry, against falling markets and tough new regulation as well as the soaring Swiss franc.

UBS had started to see client confidence return this year after it had to be rescued by the Swiss state in 2008 following massive losses on toxic assets held by its investment bank. The bank has had a history of major risk management glitches.

The $2 billion that UBS said had been lost effectively wiped out the first year of savings from a recently-announced cost-cutting plan involving the loss of 3,500 jobs.

-Reuters


Najib: Sokong BN, bukan calon sahaja

SHAH ALAM: Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak mahu anggota Barisan Nasional (BN) memberikan sokongan penuh kepada parti itu dan bukannya calon yang bertanding jika mahu merampas kembali Selangor pada pilihan raya umum (PRU) akan datang.

Perdana Menteri yang juga Pengerusi BN berkata semua anggota BN perlu menyerahkan kepada pucuk pimpinan parti untuk menentukan dan memilih calon yang sesuai serta mampu memberikan kemenangan kepada parti itu di Selangor.

Berikan sokongan sepenuhnya kepada BN, jangan merajuk, jangan sabotaj, tapi berikan sokongan habis-habisan.

Kita sudah lalui sejarah pahit sejak tiga tahun lepas, jangan biarkan sejarah berulang kembali. Jika ditakdirkan kita tidak menang pada PRU akan datang, maka malang bagi BN di Selangor, katanya ketika merasmikan Konvensyen BN Selangor di sini hari ini.

Najib yang juga Pengerusi Badan Perhubungan BN Selangor berkata selepas tamparan pada 2008 ekoran kekalahan BN di Selangor, semua pihak sepatutnya tidak memikirkan soal jawatan dalam parti sebaliknya memberikan fokus dan insaf untuk merampas kembali Selangor.

Beliau berkata semua pihak perlu sedar dengan kesilapan lepas dan sama-sama memperbaiki diri dan mempersiapkan parti untuk memenangi hati semua pihak dan bekerja bersungguh-sungguh bagi memberikan semula keyakinan rakyat kepada BN.

Jangan laung kita rampas, tapi kena laungkan juga kita insaf dengan pengalaman pahit. Sampai masa jika kita tidak jadi wakil rakyat, kita kena bersedia dan sanggup berundur serta terus memberikan sokongan kepada parti, katanya.

Kata-kata Najib itu disambut dengan teriakan sokongan dari kira-kira 3,000 perwakilan yang dijemput serta mengundang aksi spontan pimpinan tertinggi BN di Selangor yang berada ! di atas pentas utama untuk sama-sama berdiri dan mengangkat tangan tanda setuju.

Beliau turut mengulangi pertanyaan itu kepada semua hadirin yang turut berdiri dan menyatakan persetujuan.

Ahli sendiri khianati parti

Saya tanya bukan apa, kadang-kadang bila kita kalah ini, semak punya semak yang khianati kita, ahli kita sendiri, katanya dalam nada seloroh sambil meminta semua ahli BN setia kepada parti.

Perdana Menteri berkata pemimpin BN di Selangor perlu menjaga hati dan pastikan semua anggota parti sentiasa dekat dengan BN termasuklah generasi baru iaitu golongan muda yang mahu melihat BN sebagai sebuah parti yang cool.

Imej kena jaga pendekatan kita juga kena cool, macam orang muda hari ini mereka lebih gemar dengan panggilan bro, jadi kita kena fahami mereka terutamanya kebanyakan mereka merupakan pengundi kali pertama, katanya.

Najib berkata bacaan politik di Selangor juga perlu tepat sekiranya mahu menilai dan memastikan kemenangan BN di negeri itu terutamanya dalam hal membabitkan laporan penilaian yang dihantar kepada pihaknya.

Bacaan politik kena tepat, jangan tipu diri sendiri, jangan tipu pemimpin di atas, kalau buat program bukan output yang penting tapi outcome, katanya.

Beliau berkata BN perlu jujur dan ikhlas dalam tindakan dan langkah yang diambil dalam perjuangan untuk merampas semula Selangor termasuk mempunyai akujanji tiada sengketa dalam BN sendiri serta parti-parti komponen.

Jika semangat yang ada dalam dewan hari ini mampu dibawa keluar dan disampaikan kepada ahli-ahli BN di luar sana, saya yakin kita mampu merampas semula Selangor, katanya.

- Bernama


Australias Malaysia refugee swap law under fire

SYDNEY: Australias plans to send asylum-seekers to Malaysia were dealt a new blow Saturday, with the opposition criticising draft legislation intended to overcome a court ruling as damaging to human rights.

The High Court last month blocked Canberras proposal to send up to 800 would-be refugees to the Asian nation, prompting the government to seek to amend the Migration Act to ensure the transfers could go ahead.

But opposition leader Tony Abbott, whose support is crucial to the bill being passed, said he was troubled by the draft law which he said would allow a system of offshore dumping.

Abbott, who supported asylum-seekers being sent to other countries when conservative leader John Howard was in government, said the new laws would remove safeguards for boatpeople.

My initial response, and that of my senior colleagues, is that the draft legislation strips out protections that the Howard government thought was necessary, Abbott said.

Abbott said he was also troubled by some of the proposed changes which he said would give Immigration Minister Chris Bowen total discretion over where asylum-seekers could be sent.

It is really legislation for offshore dumping, Abbott said.

Its providing the minister with an unfettered discretion that doesnt require any need for relevant human rights standards.

With her Greens coalition partners against the offshore processing of refugees, Prime Minister Julia Gillards Labor government needs the support of the opposition to pass the amended legislation.

The Malaysia proposal, which Gillard hopes will stop people smugglers from bringing boatloads of asylum-seekers to Australia, has already been criticised by refugee groups which accuse Canberra of abandoning its obligations.

Under the propo! sed deal , Australia would send up to 800 asylum-seekers to Malaysia in exchange for accepting 4,000 of Kuala Lumpurs processed refugees for resettlement over four years.

Refugee advocate David Manne also criticised the draft legislation, which was released late Friday, as going well beyond what the government had previously said was necessary.

-AFP


Bangladesh website saying Bangala citizens can vote as Malaysians in PRU-13...

A Bangladesh Prime Ministers Office unit website has claimed that its citizens working in Malaysia have been asked to vote for the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) government, prompting PKR vice-president Fuziah Salleh to call for a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) into the contentious issue. Read here- www.ngoab.gov.bd

The Pakatan Rakyat (PR) had recently demanded an emergency sitting of Parliament to debate its claim that thousands of permanent residents have been given citizenship and the right to vote in the blink of an eye and the Bangladesh website quoted appears to have backed up its claim.

According to the NGO Affairs Bureau of the Prime Ministers Office website, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina met her Malaysian counterpart Datuk Seri Najib Razak last year where they discussed long standing issues, including legalising Bangladeshi workers in Malaysia.


Both met while attending the 66th World Islamic Economic Forum in Kuala Lumpur in May 2010. It said highly-placed sources claimed that during the meeting, Najib assured Sheikh Hasina of considering the issue of legalising Bangladeshi workers to Malaysia country with utmost sincerity.

Today, prime ministers office has allegedly received a confirmation from some of our citizens those working in several sectors in Malaysia since last year that they were given more than citizenships from Malaysian Government. In fact they now have been given a right to be a voter in upcoming Malaysians general election.

Another highly placed source from prime ministers office has confirmed that Bangladeshi workers may easily conferred Malaysian citizenship w! ith the condition to vote for party that represents the government in power, the website said.

The website also reported Sheikh Hasina as urging her people to take this opportunity in order to lower the national poverty in line with governments initiative and numerous measures to solve all major problems, including power and gas crises.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said last month that baseless allegations of foreigners being given the right to vote will be addressed by the parliamentary select committee (PSC) on electoral reform.


He said that although the allegations have already been proven in most cases to be untrue, the National Registration Department (NRD) has engaged the Election Commission (EC) to answer PRs claim that at least 1,600 foreigners have been added to the electoral roll.


These allegations, which I believe are baseless ... this (the PSC) is the best platform for us. We have a co-operation (between the NRD and EC) to clean if there is a need to clean and to answer any claims that need to be answered, he told reporters on August 17.

The bipartisan PSC, which will be formed in the October sitting of Parliament, will likely see PR raise its claim that BN has granted foreigners citizenships in exchange for their support in a general election that must be called by early 2013.


source:malaysia insider

PM Bangladesh sahkan rakyatnya jadi rakyat Malaysia?

cheers.

It was People Power that finished off the ISA

Aliran Executive Committee

Malaysia Day, 16 September 2011

Prime Minister Najib Razaks announcement that the ISA and the Emergency Ordinance would be repealed has taken the nation by surprise. He also announced that Section 27 of the Police Act (on public assemblies) and the requirement for publishing permits to be renewed annually would be dropped.

Most people would be inclined to welcome these announcements. But we would be well advised to temper any celebration with caution. What will replace these oppressive laws is not clear and has not yet been revealed in much detail.

The repeal of the ISA and EO is an acknowledgement that the government can no longer sustain the use of these laws without strong public condemnation and opposition. The repeal of these two laws is the only logical move.

Massive public rallies have driven the final nail into the coffin of these obnoxious laws. The people, inspired and spurred on by the civil society Abolish ISA Movement (GMI), have won a remarkable victory through their persistent and determined opposition to the ISA. For that, the people have to be congratulated.

The repeal of the ISA and EO, however, will not erase the suffering of all the detainees down the ages who have unjustly suffered at the hands of an oppressive state apparatus. Countless lives have been ruined. An independent tribunal is needed to look into all cases of ill-treatment and torture, psychological or otherwise, that have surfaced over the years. Those who have been abused and ill-treated and incarcerated without trial for years or their families must be adequately compensated. Those responsible for ill-treating or abusing detainees must be brought to book as a lesson for others who may be tempted to continue in similar ways.

Meanwhile, other laws that restrict human rights such as the Sedition Act, the Police Act, the Universities and University Colleges Act and the Official Secrets Act mus! t also b e repealed as a sign of sincerity on the part of the BN. The same goes for other preventive detention laws.

As for publishing permits, do democratic countries really require permits for publishing newspapers and other periodicals? If the Minister revokes a permit, can it now be challenged in court? In the spirit of democracy and freedom of expression, the government should also make a commitment towards creating a Freedom of Information Act. If not, there is nothing to celebrate.

To demonstrate its commitment to international human rights norms, the Malaysian government must now ratify all UN human rights treaties such as the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Refugee Rights Convention. This will convince Malaysians that the BN is serious about respecting human rights.

It is also important to put in place a truly independent judiciary so that the courts will not be used to persecute political opponents. To restore the independence of the judiciary, appointments of judges must be made based on their merits and not on political considerations as perceived by a vast majority of Malaysians.

For now, in the spirit of these announcements and to mark Malaysia Day, Aliran calls on the Malaysian government to drop all charges against the PSM 30 and others arrested before and during the Bersih rally. This would be a welcome gesture on this auspicious day.


Panchayat: Bahagian 30 Attan

Segera dikesatnya air mata yang minta digugurkan. Dikesatnya perlahan-lahan bagaikan menasihati mata itu agar menghentikan aliran air suam berkenaan.

Pemuda itu pula kembali merenung Malliga. Direnungnya sari putih yang menutup tubuh Malliga. Ditenungnya sekilas lalu wajah Malliga yang sudah hilang seri.

Ada apa, Ramani? Tanya gadis itu bagi memecahkan kebuntuan apabila terasa kurang senang ditenung begitu rupa oleh adik kembar mendiang Raja.

Bibir pemuda berkenaan bergerak-gerak sedikit. Tapi tiada suara yang keluar. Bagaikan tersekat di kerongkong. Sambil kepala masih tertunduk, ditolehnya ke kiri, ke kanan bagaikan mahu memastikan tidak ada orang lain di perkarangan rumah Malliga pada waktu itu.

Dia berdiri membelakangi gadis itu. Tapi dia dapat merasakan bahawa balu muda itu turut gelisah menanti untuk mendengar apa yang mahu dikatakannya.

Tolong lakukan sesuatu untuk saya, pinta pemuda berkenaan akhirnya sambil masih berdiri pada posisi tadi. Dia tidak melihat wajah Malliga yang memucat pada saat itu.

Lakukan apa, Ramani? Tanya si gadis apabila mendapati pemuda tersebut tidak meneruskan kata-kata.

Tolonglah , Ramani akhirnya menemui kekuatan untuk meluahkan permintaannya. Tolong jangan pakai sari putih.

Apa?

Ramani sedikit terkejut mendengar suara Malliga yang agak meninggi. Dipandangnya sekilas wajah gadis berkenaan. Malliga sedang menggeleng-geleng perlahan.

Kenapa, Ramani? Kenapa itu yang awak minta?

Pemuda berusia dua puluh empat tahun itu menggenggam telapak tangan kanan. Dipejamkannya mata dan diketapnya bibir bagai berusaha keras menahan diri daripada meluahkan suatu rahsia kepada balu muda yang sedang berdiri di hadapannya.

Kenapa; awak fikir saya tidak layak untuk menjadi balu kepada abang awak?

Pemu! da beram but keriting itu menggeleng-geleng; sekali gus membuatkan Malliga tertanya-tanya akan makna sebenar gelengan itu. Adakah maknanya bahawa Malliga tidak layak menjadi balu Raja? Atau adakah gelengan itu bermakna bahawa tanggapan Malliga tidak benar?

Jika begitu, apa sebabnya dia meminta aku tidak bersari putih? Demikian fikir Malliga.

Tolonglah. Tolong jangan tanya akan sebabnya. Tolonglah lakukannya untuk saya. Tolonglah jangan pakai sari putih.

Selepas berkata begitu, pemuda berkenaan cepat-cepat melangkah menuruni anak-anak tangga. Ketergesaannya bagaikan mahu segera meninggalkan tempat itu. Bagaikan jika dia terus berada di sana, maka air matanya akan melimpah turun. Atau suatu rahsia dirinya akan terbongkar.

Malliga melihat sahaja pemergian pemuda itu. Belum pun jauh pemuda berkenaan melangkah, Revathi datang dari arah bertentangan.

Eh, attan! Dari mana ni? Tanyanya. Kemudian memandang ke arah Malliga lalu bertanya, Kenapa ni, akka? Kenapa Ramani Attan kelihatan muram?

Entahlah, Revathi. Saya sendiri tidak faham. Gadis itu memandang wajah Ramani. Dia datang dan meminta saya supaya tidak memakai sari putih.

Ramani terus resah. Dia berusaha untuk meninggalkan tempat itu tetapi Revathi menahannya. Kemudian gadis berumur dua puluh tahun itu memandang Malliga. Direnungnya kepala berambut hitam dan tubuh bersari putih.

Memang benar apa yang dikatakan Ramani Attan. Akka tidak patut memakai sari putih .

Oh, jadi kaulah yang menyuruh Ramani supaya datang memujuk saya?

Eh, tak! Attan, beritahu Malliga Akka yang attan datang sendiri tanpa disuruh, katanya kepada pemuda itu.

Ramani terus juga membisu. Revathi merenung wajahnya. Kemudian dipandangnya Malliga di ambang pintu. Serba salah.

Tak mengapa, Revathi. Saya faham maksud kamu berdua. Tapi maafkan saya. Saya selesa dengan cara ini. Tolonglah jangan paksa saya melakukan sesuatu yang tidak mahu saya lakukan. Bersambung esok

Bahagian terdahulu

Uthaya Sankar SB boleh dihubungi menerusi e-mel uthayasb@yahoo.com.my untuk sebarang komen bagi memurnikan novel Panchayat: Edisi Khas dari aspek kesilapan bahasa, kesalahan fakta dan perkara yang mungkin menyentuh sensitiviti kaum sepanjang ia disiarkan secara bersiri di FMT.


Canada alerted to Taibs dirty assets


Corrupt Barisan Nasional l KUALA LUMPUR: Swiss-based NGO, Bruno Manser Fund (BMF), claimed that the Canadian government is taking a keen interest in complaints raised by BMF about Sarawak Chief Minister Taib Mahmuds alleged money-laundering activities in Canada.
The BMF, however, could not confirm if a formal investigation had been initiated on Taib-family-founded Sakto Corporation for the alleged offence, but said Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is well aware of the allegation.
Sakto owns and administers properties in Ottawa, Ontario, estimated to be worth well over US$100 million. It is also the centre of a Taib family-linked property empire with significant holdings in the UK, the US and Australia.

(We) can confirm that our letter (about the money-laundering activities in Canada) has aroused great interest in the Canadian government and was brought to the attention of several top (political) leaders there.
This includes Finance Minister, James M Flaherty, the person who is ultimately responsible for money-laundering matters, BNF said in a statement yesterday.
In a correspondence with the NGO, a top executive of Canadas Department of Justice gave an assurance that the Royal Canadian Mounted Polices (RCMP) integrated market enforcement team are experts in dealing with capital fraud.
Sakto run by Taibs daughter


But BMF said Canadas federal police have refused to disclose if Sakto Corporation and the Taib family were under investigation, adding that the RCMP does not normally confirm or deny the existence of any criminal investigation.
These types of investigations are conducted confidentially to protect evidence, international partnerships and reputations! . A publ ic statement is not issued identifying suspects until the matter is one of public record, the RMCP was quoted as saying.
The attention of the Canadian government over Taibs assets there comes just as the German government announced that it would launch an investigation into allegations that a German bank, Deutsche Bank, had been involved in dubious dealings.
In May, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (Finma) announced a probe into Taibs assets in Switzerland, at the instigation of Swiss President Micheline Calmy-Rey.
Sakto was founded in 1983 by Onn Mahmud, Taibs brother, together with two of Taibs college-aged children. Today, Sakto is run by Taibs daughter, Jamilah Taib, and his Canadian son-in-law, Sean Murray.
Jamilah is also a major shareholder of Cahya Mata Sarawak (CMS), Sarawaks largest private company, which BMF said has made corruption the core element of its business strategy.


HABISLAH UMNO/APCO

Mengikut kaji selidik yang dijalankan oleh Gabungan Dewan Perniagaan dan Industri Cina Malaysia (ACCCIM), pengurangan subsidi akan memberi kesan negatif ke atas perniagaan menyebabkan kenaikan inflasi dalam jangka masa terdekat. Sehubungan itu, pertumbuhan ekonomi akan menjadi lebih perlahan bagi sepatuh pertama tahun ini. Mereka juga berasa amat bimbang tentang kos sara hidup yang memuncak akibat harga makanan yang semakin meningkat.

Hasil kajian ini dengan sendirinya menempelak pujian Forbes terhadap kepositifan Model Baru Ekonomi (MBE) yang dilaksanakan oleh Najib. Percanggahan kepentingan akan terpaksa dihadapi. Mana lebih penting antara pembaharuan ekonomi dengan penurunan kadar inflasi yang mencekik leher rakyat? Bolehkah kita menolak mentah-mentah kenyataan yang mengatakan bahawa Bajet 2011 gagal menzahirkan MBE dan ETP? Tidak mungkinkah kesemua yang positif tentang Malaysia sekarang ini diperoleh melalui pengupahan media asing semata-mata?

Situasi semasa meletakkan kita dalam keadaan yang serba tidak menentu. Sorong tarik antara hal-hal yang positif dan negatif menimbulkan kecurigaan. Perasaan demikian langsung tidak membantu ke arah menstabilkan emosi dan pemikiran rakyat. Mereka akan merasa tertipu oleh kecelaruan tersebut. Tiada pihak yang dapat dipercayai sepenuhnya. Oleh hal demikian, keraguan mereka tentang kebolehan kerajaan BN yang diketuai UMNO/APCO untuk mengatasi pelbagai masalah yang dihadapi rakyat ternyata berasas.

UMNO/APCO bernasib malang kerana berada dalam keadaan defensif ketika ini. Ketika mereka gagal meyakinkan orang Melayu untuk membenci PAS, mereka sendiri yang tercedera. Imej PAS gagal dicalarkan, senjata pula makan tuan. Lebih malang lagi ialah orang Cina semakin jauh meninggalkan BN. Di samping itu, dakwaan pihak tertentu tentang sokongan orang India kembali semula kepada BN hanyalah cakap-cakap kosong yang tidak dibuktikan oleh sebarang data yang meyakinkan.

Isu M at Indera yang berlangsung selama hampir tiga minggu nampaknya telah menutup tirainya. Satu-satunya dapatan daripada permainan bodoh UMNO/APCO itu adalah jika tak pernah dijajah, maka UMNO/APCO bukanlah pejuang kemerdekaan. Habislah UMNO/APCO. Mahukah orang Melayu terus menyokong parti yang menjadi tali barut penjajah ini? Anda sendiri tahu jawapannya.

Najib risks political future with reforms

By Razak Ahmad

KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Najib Tun Razaks pledge to speed up civil liberty reforms to
attract middle-class voters could hurt his chances in the general election expected early next year by alienating conservatives.

Najib said in a televised address on Thursday that the Internal Security Act (ISA), enacted in 1960, and Emergency Ordinance, both of which allow for indefinite detention without trial, would be repealed and replaced by two news laws for use mainly against suspected militants.

By repealing or changing the security laws, which critics say have stifled freedom of expression, Najib faces resistance from influential conservatives who want a tougher stance against political dissidents.

But any failure to deliver on those pledges is likely to anger an electorate, already upset with the glacial pace of reforms, clouding the outlook for Najibs ruling coalition at the ballot box.

If reform resistance emerges and grows or if there is no substantive change, then his chances of achieving his aim (of securing a strong election win) becomes less certain, said Ibrahim Suffian, director of Merdeka Center, an independent opinion polling outfit.

Najib has promised political and economic reforms in 2008 in a bid to reverse his ruling coalitions record losses in a general election. He will need to deliver on those pledges to stay firmly in power.

As part of his pledges on Thursday, a strict media law will also be changed to allow greater media freedom and other legislation restricting civil liberties would be reviewed.

Emerging pushback

Since taking office, Najib has delayed economic reforms, including the introduction of a promised goods and services tax.

He has slowed down on! a fuel subsidy rollback to avoid sparking anger by voters hit by rising prices.

A big street protest in July, attended by young members of the middle class angered over the slow pace of reforms, also exposed a groundswell of anger that has sent Najibs approval ratings to 56 percent last month from 72 percent in May last year.

Najib has softened his stance on the reform of a controversial pro-ethnic majority Malay economic policy amid resistance by conservative groups who enjoy backing from some within his own party.

One of the most influential, Perkasa, has begun to question his promised political reforms. That could lead to a pushback and block their implementation.

Malaysian politics is now in havoc and he suddenly withdraws the ISA At the moment, I see it is more aimed to be populist rather than because of national security, said Ibrahim Ali, head of Perkasa.

The group has in the past called for the laws to be retained for use against political dissidents, and said it would study the two new security laws Najib proposed before making an official stand.

This move is a gamble by Najib and his best chances in turning it into a success depends on how well he can convince the hardliners and conservatives in his party that this will improve their electability, said the Merdeka Centers Ibrahim.

Failure to implement the changes substantively ahead of polls could lead to the kind of a voter backlash that befell Najibs predecessor Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Abdullah led the ruling coalition to a historic 90 percent sweep of the countrys parliamentary seats in the 2004 general election on a pledge of reforms including strengthening the independence of institutions like the judiciary and police.

But he was severely punished by voters in 2008 after failing to deliver on his reform promises in the face of strong resistance by the ruling party, and was forced into early retirement the following year.

I wonder how many of those who were so captured by Abdullahs promise! s feel s imilarly giddy after hearing the promises made by Najib, said political analyst Ong Kian Ming who teaches at UCSI University in Kuala Lumpur.

If you answer in the affirmative, I advise you to take a sober look at Abdullahs record and then re-examine Najibs promises, said Ong.

- Reuters


Half a step backwards in press control

The prime ministers promise to do away with annual press licences is not the big deal that its being made out to be. Its not a step forward in fact its a step backwards, to the mid-1980s.

At that time press licences, once issued, could be renewed annually without making a fresh application every year.

Then came Operation Lallang, when the Mahathir Mohamad government was fighting for its life (and plenty of money) in an Umno civil war. The Star, Watan and Sin Chew were shut down. Changes were made to the press laws.

No more renewals, back to making new applications every year. The minister has the final say whether to approve. The minister has the final say about any conditions to be imposed. The minister decides. If you dont like it you can lump it, because the ministers decision cannot be challenged. No, you cant go to the courts. Thats the law. The law says judges cannot decide. Ironic? Thats the Mahathir Mohamad style.

What else did the Mahathir government do? Introduce new and broader definitions of what is news any information, almost. Redefine what is a newspaper even something written down on a sheet of toilet paper if sold on the street could be considered a newspaper. Weird? Thats the Mahathir Mohamad style.

And what is Najib Tun Razaks style? Make a loud hullaballoo about a teensy-weensy concession, doing away with annual licences and allowing renewals. Thats not reform, thats just an administrative change to make life a little easier for paper-pushers in the bureaucracy and newspaper managements.

If nothing else is change and everything else from Mahathirs government remains, then Najibs big announcement about moving forward with the times (and remember, the Times is losing circulation by the day) is just a whitewash.

Real reform can only come when press laws are removed and political parties are banned from owning and controlling newspapers and radio and TV stations.

That takes real political courage. Does the Najib government have ! the ball s to do so?

(Dont hold your breath waiting.)


Filed under: Journalism, Politics

CIJ yawns at govt press move, calls for real reform

No sweeping reforms on Malaysia Day, especially for media and freedom of expression
Media Statement
(Sept 16, 2011)

Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) is disappointed that Prime Minister Najib Razaks promise of sweeping democratic reforms in his public address on the eve of Malaysia Day did not extend to media freedom. Najibs minor concession in removing the requirement for an annual publishing permit in the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 (PPPA) does not address other infringements on freedom of expression within the PPPA itself:

  • Under Section 5 of the PPPA, the Malaysian government still holds power over permits to publish newspapers. The Home Minister has sole power to grant or deny applications, revoke permits which have been issued (which according to the PMs announcement will not have to be renewed annually), and set conditions before issuing them. There is no recourse to judicial review of the Home Ministers decisions regarding the permits.
  • Under Section 3 of the PPPA, the Home Minister controls the licences to use printing presses.
  • Under Section 7 of the PPPA, the Home Ministry controls all publications (defined as books, articles, music, photographs, caricatures, reports, notes etc) in the country and can issue bans on those it deems undesirable.
  • The net effect is that the media, print in particular, will continue to be under government control, and journalists will continue to practise self-censorship.

    And while the Malaysian Governments support for the setting up of a self-regulatory press council in a meeting with print editors yesterday sounds promising, CIJ is cautious about the Najib administrations seeming about-turn which contradicts the various attempts over the years, as recent as July 25, 2011, to establish a state-led media council.

    The governments unreformed position when it comes to freedom of expression is reflected in its response to the ! Malaysia kini court challenge to the Home Ministrys rejection of its application for a publishing permit.

    Deputy Home Minister Abu Seman Yusop in his affidavit-in-reply filed on Sept 12, 2011, said permits were a privilege, and the denial of permits cannot be equated to denial of the right to free speech. This position ignores the peoples right to information, especially those who do not have Internet access and are thus deprived of alternative, freer media that can afford a more critical perspective.

    The Prime Minister also needs to clarify whether the government still plans to widen the scope of the PPPA to include online media, in apparent contradiction to its much-touted commitment to Internet freedom.

    Lastly, if Malaysian society and the media landscape is to be transformed, reforms have to be comprehensive and it requires major changes in the letter as well as spirit of various laws, such as the Sedition Act 1948, and the Penal Code provisions for criminal defamation. It also requires a paradigm shift that will see broad-based reforms on democratic and human rights, the most crucial of which is to restore judicial independence and introduce police accountability.


    Filed under: Journalism, Media

    Peanuts, not sweeping reforms

    by Kee Thuan Chye
    Free Malaysia Today
    September 16, 2011

    Lets not be fooled, people. The changes Najib announced are merely cosmetic, and will have to be passed in Parliament first before they become effective.

    COMMENT

    PEANUTS. Thats what Prime Minister Najib Tun Razaks so-called sweeping reforms are. They hardly amount to a political transformation.

    While its cheering to note that the Internal Security Act (ISA) will be repealed finally, after our many years of waiting and that the Emergency proclamations are to be lifted a decision that is decades overdue its disturbing to be told that they will be replaced by two new laws aimed at preventing subversion and safeguarding public order.

    And even though the detention period under these new laws may be shorter, with further extensions to be made by court order, the Home Minister is still the one to decide who gets detained for suspicion of being a terrorist.

    This means, theoretically speaking, that although Najib has given the commitment that no individual will be detained purely based on political ideology, there is no stopping the government from branding a political opponent a suspected terrorist, whether or not he is one. Just to lock him away.

    Another so-called reform is scrapping the requirement for publications to renew their printing licences annually.

    This, also, is nothing to crow about. It still means that publications have to obtain a licence that the Home Minister may or may not grant. It still means the Home Minister has the absolute power to suspend or revoke a licence at any time. And his decision cannot be challenged in court. He does not even have to give a reason.

    It also means the Home Ministry can still call up newspaper editors and cow them into submission for publishing something the ! ministry finds objectionable. Like what happened recently to The Star when it ran the heading Ramadhan delights for an eating-out supplement that was not totally devoted to halal food.

    The ministry can still practise the double standards it has been practising turn a blind eye to the race-baiting and rabble-rousing of Utusan Malaysia but come down hard on the minor transgressions of other publications. So wheres the change?

    If the government were truly sincere and had the political will, it should repeal the Publications and Printing Presses Act (PPPA) and no longer require publications to obtain a printing licence. That would be in keeping with the spirit of what Najib talked about instituting in Malaysia when he announced the reforms on Sept 15 a democratic system based on the universal philosophy of of the people, by the people and for the people.

    Vague reforms

    None of the newly announced reforms fully cohere with this spirit.

    On Section 27 of the Police Act, Najib said there would be a review to take into consideration the provisions under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution which guarantees Malaysians the right to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of association.

    But in the same breath, he said police permits would still be required for street demonstrations, subject to certain criteria.

    If freedom of assembly, which should be a right of all citizens, is still curtailed in this fashion, what is that rubbish talk of Najibs about forging a democratic system of the people, by the people and for the people?

    He did say, however, that permission to assemble will be given in accordance with procedures to be fixed later that will take into account international norms. But this sounds vague. What international norms did he mean? And when is later going to be?

    And speaking of Article 10, why doesnt the government address the other impediments to freedom of speech, such as the Official Secrets Act (OSA), the Sedition Act, the ! Universi ties and University Colleges Act (UUCA), the Multimedia and Communications Act, the Public Order (Preservation) Ordinance?

    No wonder Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein was smirking and applauding when Najib made his announcements. His absolute powers remain intact.

    Lets not be fooled, people. The changes Najib announced are merely cosmetic. And of course they will have to be passed in Parliament first before they become effective.

    Meanwhile, Articles 149 and 150 are still there to provide Parliament with the power to pass laws that do not have to be consistent with the freedoms guaranteed in Articles 5, 9, 10 and 13, and to allow the Cabinet to declare an emergency. The Emergency proclamations may go, but Article 150 is still around. We the people are still vulnerable.

    Some of us may say that we cannot expect the government to make such truly sweeping reforms in one go, and that we should be thankful for the small mercies we are now getting. Some may say this could be just the beginning, and more reforms could come.

    Thats well and good. But at the same time, we should give credit where its due for this beginning. Its not Najib we should thank. What we are getting is what has been due us for a long time, what any concerned government should have given us even without our having to pressure them to do so.

    We should instead acknowledge that the March 8 effect lives on, and therefore the credit for these changes should go to us the rakyat for voting as we did on March 8, 2008. We voted in a stronger opposition, we denied the ruling party the two-thirds majority that it had abused to increasingly curb our democratic rights over the decades. We sent them the message that enough was enough.

    These reforms have now come about because Barisan Nasional (BN) wants to stay in power, and it has realised that we have the power to decide whether that will happen. The reforms are meant to win back our votes. Ever since Najib took over as prime minister, he has been doing things m! erely to ensure that BNs goal is fulfilled, not because he is altruistic or benevolent in spirit. We have seen his meanness in numerous other ways.

    Watching him speak on Sept 15 when announcing these reforms as part of his Malaysia Day address, we could have contrasted it with his speech to 6,000 Umno members and Malay NGOs at Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC) a couple of days after the Bersih 2.0 rally, and call him two-faced.

    Contemptuous chauvinist

    At that PWTC gathering, he was far from being the prime minister who cared about reform and the good of the entire country.

    He was a truculent thug who roused the crowd with the boast of Umnos ability to round up a million members to conquer Kuala Lumpur. He was a contemptuous chauvinist who exhorted the Malays to unite in order to teach the Bersih 2.0 protesters a lesson and show them whose country this is.

    No doubt, he has since realised his mistakes in his handling of the Bersih 2.0 rally and is now making amends. His ratings have dropped and hes trying to make them go up again. Hence these reforms. But lets be wary of his sincerity and be clear about his real purpose.

    Let us keep sight as well of the many more ills that the government has not comprehensively addressed, such as corruption, rent-seeking, wasteful spending, Umnoputraism, our pathetic education system.

    Let us demand more reforms, especially those pertaining to our institutions, such as the judiciary, the police, the Attorney-Generals Office, the Election Commission, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

    There is still a long road ahead. Unless and until the reforms are truly sweeping and the restrictive laws abolished, we should not put our trust in Najib and BN.

    Make them sweat, make them work, and dont let them take us for granted. Never again.

    Dramatist and journalist Kee Thuan Chye is the author of March 8: Time for Real Change. He is a contributor to FMT.


    Turning orange peel into plastic

    British scientists are pioneering a novel way of recycling that turns orange peel into plastic.

    The technique relies on high-powered microwaves that can degrade the tough cellulose molecules of plant matter so that they release volatile gases that can be collected and distilled into a liquid product.

    These valuable biodegradable chemicals can then be used in water purifiers, cleaning agents and plastics. Researchers behind the process say it is 90 per cent efficient and works not just on orange peel but almost any plant-based waste such as straw or coffee grounds.

    James Clark, professor of green chemistry at the University of York, said he is building a small demonstrator facility to show the novel recycling scheme can be scaled up in order to suit industrial applications.

    "It will be able to cope with tens of kilograms an hour. We believe it is the right scale to prove to people that this is a viable technology," Professor Clark said.

    "You dice the peel and put it into a microwave field. You then focus the microwaves as you would with a domestic microwave oven but at higher power," he said.

    "The microwaves activate the cellulose and that triggers the release of chemicals or further chemical reactions inside the orange peel," he told the British Science Festival at Bradford University.

    Volatile chemicals are released in the process, including d-limonene, which is responsible for the distinctive smell of citrus fruit and is used in cosmetics, the cleaning industry and as a biological insecticide.

    "As you produce the volatiles you strip them off continuously. It's a continuous process. You feed the peel into a microwave zone and have a pipe that takes off the volatile fractions as they are produced," he said

    "The un ique feature of our microwave is that we work at deliberately low temperatures. We never go above 200C. You can take the limonene off or you can turn limonene into other chemicals," he said. "It works really well with waste paper. It can take a big range of bio-waste material."

    York University has set up the Orange Peel Exploitation Company with Brazilian and Spanish partners to test the idea of using orange peel residue left behind from the juice-making industry in the two countries.

    "There are eight million tonnes of orange residue in Brazil. For every orange that's squeezed to make juice, about half of it is wasted. What we've discovered is that you can release the chemical and energy potential of orange peel using microwaves," Professor Clark said.

    "Orange peel is an excellent example of a wasted resource. Brazil is the largest producer of orange juice in the world," he said.

    The idea is to take the technology to places where large amounts of plant waste are already collected, such as a power stations that collect biomass for burning or a farming district that packs or processes foodstuffs, Professor Clark said.

    "We are talking to farmers who are already concentrating a lot of biomass for palletising before going to power stations about the possibility of locating a facility in one of these centralised units," he said.

    "We're talking to power stations about materials that they are already bringing in for microwaving as well. If you put typical waste into our system before you burn it, the calorific value doubles compared to what it was before," Professor Clark told the meeting.



    Solicitors from Hell


    There is a fine line between fearless and reckless. Rick Kordowski appears to have ignored the line completely, inviting the fury of 120,000 of Britain's lawyers, who are threatening to drag him before the courts.

    The 50-year-old from Essex provoked the anger of solicitors up and down the country when he set up his website Solicitors from Hell, which names and shames those members of the profession who are alleged to have provided a shoddy service.

    Thus far he has fought off repeated attempts by individual solicitors to shut the site down.

    Now, using their collective might, more than 100,000 solicitors represented by the Law Society have threatened him with legal action unless he shuts down once and for all.

    Mr Kordowski, a self-employed graphic designer, said he set up the website six years ago after solicitors acting on his behalf in a protracted legal battle with his local council failed to live up to his expectations.

    The website, which he sees as a "public service", has cost him dear: he is bankrupt after being sued 16 times for libel and has yet to pay more than 150,000 in fines.

    He now faces claims of alleged defamation, harassment and breaches of the Data Protection Act and will be required to appear in front of a High Court judge at the end of this month, unless he closes the site down and undertakes not to launch anything similar.

    But Mr Kordowski remains unrepentant, despite having failed to win a single libel case brought against him. Not only has he refused to remove the site, he has added fuel to the fire: last week he threatened to sue the Law Society's chief executive, Des Hudson, for defamation. Mr Kordowski claims Mr Hudson recently branded him a "criminal".

    "There 's a need for my website, as many people have said, and it makes them feel better for being able to post on it," Mr Kordowski said this weekend from his home. "All I need is an appropriate story from someone which is useful to other people and their contact details. I see it as helping people voice their complaints and it has been working: authors have contacted me and said, 'I've now sorted it out with my solicitor, please can you take my listing down'."

    Although some, while concerned about his methods, feel he is providing a much-needed outlet, others including most solicitors believe Mr Kordowski's actions are downright criminal.

    Last October, after lengthy discussions in parliament, the Legal Ombudsman was set up to deal with complaints that the public felt were falling on deaf ears. Nevertheless, critics of the legal profession believe a number of consumers are getting a fair hearing.

    Katy Dowell, from the legal profession magazine, The Lawyer, said: "It can't be right that just anyone can defame another person in such a public forum without checks. Lawyers are up in arms about the site, and if it was affecting your livelihood you would feel the same way.

    "But Mr Kordowski has a point to make and if the Legal Ombudsman were more visible then perhaps consumers wouldn't feel the need to use the website."

    The Law Society did not respond to a request for comment.

    ****************************************************************

    In Malaysia there is a need for such a site because we have many crook lawyers. I have personally complaint two lawyers to the bar council and nothing was done. This is because these lawyers are datuk and working hand in hand with thugs.


    Confirmed Bangladeshi workers are Malaysian citizen to vote for UMNO





    BANGLADESHI Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina told that she has been in Malaysia during her 6-day visit to South Korea and Malaysia last year.

    At the last leg of her six-day tour, Hasina arrived in Malaysia on May 18 to attend the 66th World Islamic Economic Forum [WIFE] in Kuala Lumpur, the next day where she delivered a special speech. During her stay in Kuala Lumpur, she held bilateral talks with her Malaysian counterpart Mohammed Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak when some long standing issues, including legalizing Bangladeshi workers in Malaysia, were prominently discussed.

    Highly placed sources claimed that during the meeting, the Malaysian prime minister assured Hasina of considering the issue of legalizing Bangladeshi workers to his country with utmost sincerity.

    Today, Prime Ministers office has allegedly received a confirmation from some of our citizens those working in several sectors in Malaysia since last year that they were given more than citizenships from Malaysian Government. In fact they now have been given a right to be a voter in upcoming Malaysians general election.

    Another highly placed source from prime ministers office has confirmed that Bangladeshi workers may easily conferred Malaysian citizenship with the condition to vote for party that represents the government in power.

    Honorable Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina urges people to take this opportunity in order to lower the national poverty in line with governments initiative and numerous measures to solve all major problems, including power and gas crises.

    Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina also urged Malaysian entrepreneurs to invest more in Bangladesh, particularly in labor-intensive industries including re! adymade garment, textile, light engineering, electronics, agro-based products, ICT, power and infrastructure.
    **************************************************************
    You tango, I tango. Soon we can have a Bangladeshi as Prime Minister of Malaysia and the Royalties can eat shit.



    Are They Really Listening When It Comes To Oppressive Laws?

    Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch once said, "Its a fallacy to suggest Malaysia needs laws that violate basic rights in order to maintain a peaceful and harmonious society. Malaysians have time and again proven themselves capable of exercising the basic democratic rights to which they are entitled. Its time their government listened."



    For Hari Malaysia today, the PM Najib promised to "abolish" or "repeal" the Internal Security Act (ISA). The question is, was he listening to the citizens he serves?

    Now the ISA is the most popular of Malaysia's draconian laws. Most of the detainees are high profile politicians and other opponents of the government, along with a sprinkle of genuine terrorists.

    While the ISA may not be used anymore, nothing has been said about the Emergency Ordinance which has been abused far more than any other law.

    It took at least 2 weeks of candlelight vigils around Kuala Lumpur to get the government's attention. The PSM6 were in custody for over a month.

    To begin with, Najib's promises are not something I take very seriously. I believe this is basically posturing for the international scene. After all, the Sydney Morning Herald appears to have bought his claims in Malaysia to abandon its harshest laws.

    What the SMH also has missed is the fact that two of the laws that are purportedly being repealed are merely being replaced by two other differently-worded laws but with potentially same consequences.

    So did we really ! gain our basic democratic rights? Has the government listened?

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...