Oy, Najib! Is this how you plan to rule the country?
Bersih is Pakatan stooge, EC is BN's catpaw...
The Election Commission in its most scathing attack on the Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0) said today the NGO's planned July 9 rally was merely to build momentum for Pakatan Rakyat's bid for Putrajaya.This is because the first Bersih rally in 2007 led to the political tsunami of 2008, EC deputy chairperson Wan Ahmad Wan Omar told a forum called "Bersih's demands - what is the Election Commission's explanation?" today.
"There was (a 2007) demonstration and as result, a momentum was built and in the 2008 election (the opposition) won big... now, the rumour is that snap polls will be called and history will be repeated.
"(They think) let us have Bersih 2.0 with more supporters, the momentum will grow and possibly win Putrajaya," he told an audience of about 500 people.
Therefore, Wan Ahmad appealed to Bersih chief S Ambiga to disassociate the NGO from political parties, and put this as a condition for further engagement between the commission and the NGO.
"If Bersih separates itself from political parties, then we can meet Bersih as a member of civil society as its agenda is for the good of all," Wan Ahmad said.
He said Bersih today is no longer the Bersih (he) used to know and that is has become kusut (a mess), so much so that Ambiga did not realise that she was being used as a political tool.
So many people want to join the bandwagon with so many issues don't blame the police, they have a bigger responsibility. Sane people will remove themselves from this group and let the political party go ahead and take the risk (of persecution), he said.
On the demand for the use of indelible ink, on which civil society harassed and put the commission was under pressure to adopt in 2008, Wan Ahmad said the move was regressive as the only countries in the world that use it are the less developed countries of Africa and Indonesia.In an immediate response, Bersih 2.0 chief S Ambiga swatted aside the EC's accusations, saying that it is the commission that bears the burden of proving it is impartial.
The EC has to be very careful what they say, because they may accuse me of many things but the constitution requires them to be independent.
Is what they are saying; does it show they are independent? That's all, and I ask the public to judge for themselves, she said.
source:malaysiakini
SPR: Ambiga diperalat, BERSIH kian kusut
'Hampir mustahil' mengundi dua kali, kata SPR
cheers.
SPR Masih Lagi Mengelat Tidak Mahu Guna Dakwat Kekal
Jelasnya, SPR juga akan memperkenalkan sistem biometrik kerana "kita tidak mahu pusing balik sejarah untuk calit dakwat," kata Wan Ahmad lagi.
Tambahnya, penggunaan dakwat kekal yang mencetus kontroversi menjelang pilihan raya umum ke-12 itu perlu perlu melibatkan pindaan ke atas Fasal (1) Perkara 119 dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan berhubung kelayakan seseorang pemilih.
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Penggunaan dakwat kekal itu akan menafikan hak seseorang untuk mengundi, sedangkan undang-undang berkenaan menjamin hak pengundi untuk berbuat demikian, katanya.
Ada beberapa perkara yang saya nak komen di sini:
1.0 Dato Wan Ahmad mendakwa penggunaan dakwat kekal adalah satu langkah mundur ke belakang. Soalnya sekarang, mengapa tiada negara yang menggunakan dakwat kekal menghadapi apa-apa masaalah? Walaupun ianya digunakan oleh negara dunia ke tiga, namun ianya kekal digunakan kerana ianya berkesan dan terjamin adil.
2.0 Sistem biometrik yang dicadangkan oleh Dato Wan Ahmad itu ada mempunyai sistem kawalannya sendiri. Soalnya, adakah SPR dan JPN akan mengizinkan parti2 yang bertanding menjalankan audit serta pemeriksaan bebas mereka sendiri termasuk dari Parti pembangkang. Sudah tentu tidak? Jadi, bagaimanakah sistem biometrik dapat menjamin keadilan?
3.0 IC Malaysia boleh ditiru dan dipalsukan> Telah ramai yang ditangkap kerana memalsukan IC MAlaysia. Masih ramai di sana yang masih terlepas. SPR tidak boleh menjamin seseorang yang ber IC palsu tidak akan mengundi dua kali. Tetapi, kalau ada dakwat kekal, hatta yang ber IC palsu pun tidak boleh mengundi dua kali.
4.0 Soal berlawanan dengan Perlembagaan Negara adalah alasan yang sangat dangkal. Ini adalah kerana apabila dakwat telah tercalit bererti seseorang itu TELAH PUN MENGUNDI. Jadi, di mana kah berlakunya perlanggaran dari segi Perlembagaan Malaysia?
Pengerusi SP! R ni kak i belit dan kaki auta. Sememangnya Dato Wan Ahmad ni adalah agen UMNO dan agen Barisan Nasional.
Patutlah SPR Sebuk Sangat Nak Guna Sistem Biometrik
Kenapa takut sangat dengan dakwat kekal? Ia murah dan mudah dipakai serta berkesan?
Patutlah SPR sibuk nak gunakan Sistem Biometrik....
Beberapa hari yang lalu... Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) bercadang menggunakan sistem biometrik yang membolehkan proses pengesahan pengundi dilakukan secara elektronik, pada pilihan raya umum akan datang.
Pengerusinya, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof berkata, SPR akan bekerjasama dengan Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) untuk menggunakan sistem tersebut yang kini diguna pakai terhadap warga asing.500,000 warga Bangladesh didaftar menerusi sistem biometrik
PUTRAJAYA 29 Jun - Semua warganegara Bangladesh di negara ini yang dianggarkan 500,000 orang, sama ada masuk ke Malaysia secara sah atau haram, akan didaftarkan menerusi sistem biometrik dengan kerjasama kerajaan Bangladesh.
Menteri Dalam Negeri Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein berkata, program itu, sebahagian program pemutihan yang diumumkan kerajaan baru-baru ini, akan dapat menyelesaikan masalah pendatang asing tanpa izin, di samping menangani jenayah merentas sempadan dengan membendung kegiatan haram termasuk penyeludupan dan pemerdagangan manusia.
"Objektifnya ialah menghentikan eksploitasi ke atas mereka ini oleh penyeludup manusia, sindiket atau pihak ketiga kerana kita berpendapat atas alasan kemanusiaan sahaja, kita perlu memeranginya habis-habisan, katanya kepada pada sidang akhbar bersama dengan Pesuruhjaya Tinggi Bangladesh ke Malaysia, Atiqur Rehman, di sini hari ini.
Hisham! muddin b erkata proses itu akan diselaraskan oleh Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Dalam Negeri Tan Sri Mahmood Adam pada peringkat makro, untuk mengkaji bagaimana proses itu dapat dilaksanakan segera manakala Timbalan Ketua Setiausaha (Pendaftaran dan Imigresen) Datuk Alwi Ibrahim akan meneliti proses pendaftaran. - Bernama
Another BUM2011 Forum Rocks In on Sunday July 24 With Lunch!
Theme: Nation Building Across The Political Divide
Date: Sunday, 24 July 2011
Time: 10.30am to 2.30pm
Venue: Maju Palace Restaurant, Maju Junction, Kuala Lumpur
ADMISSION: Open to the Public, Fee Payable at RM50 per pax with Table booking at RM500 per table for 10 most welcome
Tentative Programme Outline:
10.15AM: Registration of Guests starts
10.45AM: Welcoming Speech
by BUM 2011 Organising Committee Chairman, YL Chong, Desi
11.00AM: Keynote Address by YB Menteri Besar of Selangor Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim on a ***TOPIC related to the Theme wrt Selangor Experience
Q and A to follow: 20 minutes
**************LUNCH TO BE SERVED 12.15PM-12.45PM and Resumed 2.00PM-2.30PM***********************
Forum: 12.45PM to 2.00PM on Topic Mere Sloganeering on Transformation or Reform Is Not Enough, the Rakyat Want to See a Better Life! featuring:
Panel of 4 to 5 Speakers to speak 10-12minutes each.
Q and A to follow
Kuala Lumpur
June 30, 2011
***NOTE: Topic to be finalised by Selangor MBs Office
And Panellists to be Finalised VERY SOON!
Bersih Rally a Turning Point for Democracy
By Kim QuekAmidst the frenzy of draconian measures to prevent the July 9 Bersih rally from taking place, many Malaysians have begun to wonder: Has Malaysia descended into a state of lawlessness?
No sooner had Home Minister declared that wearing the yellow Bersih T-shirt was illegal, the Inspector General of Police up the ante by announcing that even shoes, cars, buses or any medium that promote the Bersih rally are illegal, as this amounts to sedition, and he said the people involved will be arrested.
To date, more than a hundred people have been arrested all over the country in the past four days, mainly for wearing the yellow Bersih shirts.
To me, this sounds like someone speaking and acting as if he is the absolute monarch who can order the arrest of anyone at his whims, and whose word is law. For nowhere in the Malaysian law can you find a provision that allow a minister or a police officer to declare an item such as the Bersih shirt illegal or to arrest someone before a crime is committed or suspected to have been committed. The Bersih rally is not even held, so how can a crime be committed in connection with the rally?
BERSIH ABOVE BOARD
So, what has driven the Minister and the IGP into such extreme conduct of resorting to brazenl! y unlawf ul exercise of power?
Is Bersih a terrorist organization that plots to overthrow the government by violence? Is Bersih calling people to break laws and create chaos? What terrible deeds have Bersih done to cause such phobia in the authorities that they should strike at everything that moves, so to speak, that smells of Bersih?
None of that.
Bersih is a civil society movement participated by sixty two non-government organizations to campaign for electoral reforms. . And the July 9 rally is specifically called to address the problem of the authorities recalcitrance to institute any form of reform. Despite persistent requests over many years, the Election Commission and the incumbent ruling coalition Barisan Nasional have not moved even one inch towards reforming an electoral system that has been reduced to a complete farce through ever escalating vote-buying, abuse of power and massive rigging.
With such noble intention, how could Bersih be branded as anything other than a respectable body that works towards restoration of democracy and return of political power to the people? It should be obvious by now that without free and fair election, political power is vested in a few incumbent leaders, not with the people.
And when such a respectable body calls for a rally to highlight its cause to the nation, how can such a rally be taboo, and everything connected with it be decreed illegal?
Up to now, the incumbent hegemon Umno and the police have not come up with an iota of credible evidence that the Bersih rally is anything but a peaceful and honourable gathering, called in accordance with the right endowed by the Constitution to every citizen. Regretably, the police have so far conducted themselves as a force serving Umnos parochial political interests, in direct confrontation with the interests of the masses.
AUTHORITIES EXCUSES INCREDULOUS
The excuses given so far to justify arrest and to label the rally illegal are laughable and carr! y no cre dibility accusations such as a communist plot to wage war against the Agong, a movement aided by foreign Christian bodies to subvert the country, an event that will jeopardize public order and national security, and cause economic damage.
These tales of impending threats and calamities are so far-fetched that they are not only disbelieved by decent Malaysians, but also reflect the paucity of rationale of the incumbent power to justify their condemnation and clampdown on the movement.
That their excuses to crucify the Bersih rally are rubbish is amply manifested in the admirable political and economic well being of those democratic countries where such peaceful rallies are part and parcel of their democratic way of life. Look at our regional neighbor Hong Kong. Rallies of a few hundred thousand people to demonstrate against the Hong Kong or Chinese government are routinely staged there, and yet there was not the slightest indication that public order was affected or businesses harmed. On the contrary, Hong Kong continues to enjoy ever increasing prosperity and stability.
So, what is Umno afraid of?
The honest truth and the bottom line is: Umno has no confidence to politically survive a free and fair election.
That is why it has not yielded an inch in the direction of moving Malaysian election to a more level-playing field, and it has no intention to do so in the future.
Umno also realizes that it has committed too many wrongs that betray the peoples interest, and more people have come to know of these through the fast growing alternative media. Combined with the growing influence of opposition alliance Pakatan Rakyat, the coming rally could be a powerful demonstration of the peoples will to reclaim sovereignty from the long-reigning kleptocracy through electoral reforms.
That is something that Umno does not want to see happening.
NO WIN FOR UMNO
We can hence expect that Umno will continue to step up pressure against Bersih by man! ipulatin g compliant institutions such as police and judiciary, at the expense of the Constitution and law, to stifle the Bersih move.
But Umno is in a no-win situation. To be faithful to the Constitution which means that the peaceful rally must be allowed to proceed, Umno dreads to see a mammoth assembly that could be demoralizing to its dwindling supporters. On the hand, a brutal repression that breaks all laws may kindle public fury to an explosive state with unpredictable consequences. Even if it succeeds in suppressing the rally, it can only bring temporary relief to Umno, as the ugly scenes of unjustified cruelty and transgression of law and fundamental human rights will be mercilessly bared for all to see, thanks to modern IT technology, reminiscent of the Tahrir square uprising and the subsequent revolutionary fire that has spread across the entire Arab world. By that time, Umno and BNs popular support may have so dwindled that even the status quo of skewed election and stooge institutions cannot save it from an electoral defeat.
I am confident that the majority of Malaysians has already reached such a level of political consciousness that the will of the people will prevail to make July 9 rally an important turning point in our struggle to reclaim democracy and sovereignty for the people.
Napped for wearing yellow
Police continued with their nationwide crackdown on Bersih 2.0 supporters, arresting those clad in yellow, including two elected representatives from PKR in Perak.Gopeng MP Dr Lee Boon Chye (centre in photo) and Simpang Pulai state assemblyperson Chan Ming Kai and two PKR members were arrested at the Gunung Rapat morning market in Ipoh while meeting voters this morning, for being in yellow clothes.
Lee claimed that he was detained soon after his arrival at the market around 9am. He was handcuffed and taken to the Ipoh police district headquarters.
"I did not wear a Bersih t-shirt, it was normal yellow cloth. I just arrived at the market and started to shake hands with voters, then they arrested me," he said when contacted, adding that he did not distribute leaflets had a banner at that time.
Police told Lee that he was arrested under the Police Act to prevent an illegal assembly.
Polis terus mengasak penyokong BERSIH 2.0 dengan menangkap mereka yang berpakaian kuning, termasuk dua lagi wakil rakyat Pakatan Rakyat di Perak.Ahli parlimen Gopeng Dr Lee Boon Chye (kiri) dan ADUN Simpang Pulai Chan Ming Kai berserta dua lagi anggota PKR ditangkap di sebuah pasar di Gunung Rapat pagi ini kerana berpakaian kuning.
Lee mendakwa beliau dicekup sebaik tiba sekitar pasar itu pada jam 9 pagi. Wakil rakyat PKR itu terus digari dan diheret ke ibu pejabat polis daerah Ipoh.
"Saya tidak memakai kemeja T BERSIH, ia hanya baju biasa yang berwarna kuning. Saya baru tiba di pasar dan mula berjabat tangan dengan pengundi, kemudian mereka menahan saya, katanya ketika dihubungi.
Lee juga berkata beliau tidak mengedarkan sebarang risalah atau membawa sebarang sepanduk ketika itu.Menurutnya, p! olis mem aklumkan kepadanya beliau ditangkap mengikut Akta Polis bagi menghalang perhimpunan haram.
Semalam, di Sungai Siput, Perak polis menangkap ADUN Jalong Leong Mei Ming dan ADUN Teja Chang Lih Kang kerana memakai kemeja BERSIH.
Human Rights Watch: End Crackdown on Peaceful Campaigners
Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch
Human Rights WatchThe Malaysian government should immediately end its crackdown on the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih) and release everyone arbitrarily detained for involvement in its activities, Human Rights Watch said today. Police should return all Bersih-related materials confiscated during the past week and cease pursuing spurious criminal charges, including sedition and "waging war against the king," against peaceful political activists, Human Rights Watch said.
On June 29, 2011, police raided Bersih's office at the organization Empower, arresting seven people and confiscating computers, office equipment, Bersih literature, posters, and t-shirts. According to the inspector general of police, Tan Sri Ismail Omar, 101 people have been arrested on various charges in the past five days for promoting what he termed an "illegal assembly," namely Bersih's planned march in Kuala Lumpur on July 9.
"The Malaysian government's crackdown on an! elector al reform group shows utter disregard both for free expression and for the democratic process," said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "Governments that elected Malaysia to a second term on the UN Human Rights Council might feel duped."
The Malaysian government, instead of responding substantively to Bersih's eight-point electoral reform program, has begun an apparent campaign to discredit the coalition and to scare off Malaysians who had considered participating in the July 9 march.
Thirty members of the opposition Socialist Party of Malaysia (PSM) remain in custody in Penang after being arrested on June 25 on the way to a political rally under the draconian charge of "waging war against the king" of Malaysia. The inspector general of police told journalists that "foreign elements" - whom he declined to identify - were involved and would take advantage of the unrest if the rally went ahead.
Article 10 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia recognizes the rights to freedom of association, peaceful assembly, speech and expression that are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In seeking a seat on the UN Human Rights Council, Malaysia pledged in an official communication to other governments on March 9, 2010 that it "reaffirms its full commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights at both the domestic and international levels."
The government is seeking to prosecute Bersih leaders and activists under laws such as the Sedition Act of 1948 and the Police Act of 1967 in violation of fundamental rights recognized under international law, Human Rights Watch said.
Human Rights Watch urged the Malaysian government to end its crackdown on Bersih and instead promptly initiate discussions with the Bersih steering committee and representatives of the 60 civil society groups that endorsed Bersih's proposed electoral reforms.
The government should also heed the June 27 call by the governmental Human Rights Commission of ! Malaysia (SUHAKAM) and permit the July 9 Bersih rally to proceed. It should also permit possible counter-Bersih marches being planned by United Malays National Organization (UMNO) Youth and Perkasa and should ensure that police act in a nonpartisan manner to keep all the marches safely apart.
"Prime Minister Najib Razak should be welcoming efforts to reform the country's elections instead of jailing those urging reform," Robertson said. "By continuing these scare tactics, the Malaysian government is seriously damaging the country's reputation abroad."
Prime Minister of whore talks on air
The residents from Taman Maluri does not need RM3 million or RM5 million, we are very reasonable.
Our request:
1. Police Kg Pandan pondok to get back their land from Naza Motor.
2. Repair 16 pot holes.
3. Get rid of illegal stalls.
4. Close all the gambling dens in Jalan Belangkas, Off Kg Pandan, Kuala Lumpur.
5. Repair all street lights.
6. Repair all broken drains and ensure there is no stagnant water.
7. Relocation of the Pasar Malam held every Wednesday.
See no millions needed.
So brother, you help me and I will help you boleh tak?
Syarikat Pembina Perumahan Untung Berbillion. Rakyat Semakin Tersepit Kerana Harga Rumah yang Mahal
Salah satu syarikat tersebut adalah Mah Sing Group Bhd yang baru mengisytiharkan keuntungan sebanyak RM1.5 ribu juta (billion) sehingga bulan 30 June 2011.
Tak heranlah syarikat2 ini untung berlipat-lipat kali ganda sebab kerajaan Malaysia tidak memikirkan bahawa rumah adalah satu keperluan, bukan satu pilihan.
Apa guna pinjaman 100% kalau sebuah keluarga terpaksa membelanja pendapatan mereka sebanyak minimum Rm3000 sebulan? Apa yang tinggal untuk makan, kereta dsbnya?
Juga, tiada usaha dari kerajaan menghalang orang asing membeli rumah di Malaysia. Ini akan mengurangkan keuntungan syarikat2 pembina perumahan ini yang mana mereka ini sentiasa membantu parti pemerintah dari segi kewangan.
Akhir sekali, rakyat yang sakit. Kroni dan UMNOPUTRA terus kaya
Tulang Besi
Mah Sing achieves RM1.15b sales to date
Written by Joy Lee of theedgemalaysia.com
Thursday, 30 June 2011 12:38
KUALA LUMPUR: MAH SING GROUP BHD [] has recorded RM1.15 billion in property sales to date.
The company said on Thursday, June 30 that the RM1.15 billion sales totalled 60% of the RM2 billion target which it had set for 2011.
SPR Sudah Jadi Suara UMNO.......
Kita masih tidak lupa peranan SPR membantu rampasan kuasa Barisan Nasional di Perak. Sedari dulu lagi, Tulang Besi memanggil SPR sebagai PELACUR KEPADA UMNO.
Bersih is Pakatan stooge in bid for Putrajaya
Aidila Razak
Jun 30, 11
12:21pm
The Election Commission in its most scathing attack on the Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0) said today the NGO's planned July 9 rally was merely to build momentum for Pakatan Rakyat's bid for Putrajaya.
NONEThis is because the first Bersih rally in 2007 led to the political tsunami of 2008, EC deputy chairperson Wan Ahmad Wan Omar told a forum called "Bersih's demands - what is the Election Commission's explanation?" today.
"There was (a 2007) demonstration and as result, a momentum was built and in the 2008 election (the opposition) won big... now, the rumour is that snap polls will be called and history will be repeated.
"(They think) let us have Bersih 2.0 with more supporters, the momentum will grow and possibly win Putrajaya," he told an audience of about 500 people.
Therefore, Wan Ahmad appealed to Bersih chief S Ambiga to disassociate the NGO from political parties, and put this as a condition for further engagement between the commission and the NGO.
"I am appealing to Ambiga to distance yourself from political parties (and) strengthen your agenda.
"If Bersih separates itself from political parties, then we can meet Bersih as a member of civil society as its agenda is for the good of all," Wan Ahmad said.
Guess Who Won Brownie Points?
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/06/28/we-wont-retaliate-says-pkr-y
outh/
PETALING JAYA: PKR Youth has a very simple tactic to counter Umno
Youth's provocations - simply ignore them.
Last night, Umno Youth supporters on motorcycles gathered at PKR
headquarters threatening to burn down the building and demanding that
the party withdraw its support for Bersih's planned rally.
PKR Youth deputy chief, Khairul Anuar Ahmad Zainuddin, refused to be
goaded, saying they will not retaliate to Umno Youth's provocations.
"They will not threaten us into this kind of confrontational politics.
We are very clear about our objective," he said.
"The July 9 rally is to call for electoral reforms. It is not to fight
against Umno Youth, Perkasa or the police. We will not be distracted by
provocative acts. We will keep our focus," he added.
Pemuda UMNO dan Parti Kominis China Bertukar-Tukar Pimpinan
Umno, China Communists to swap youth leaders(BERNAMA)
August 05, 2010
A giant portrait of Mao Zedong, the CPCs first chairman, is seen in Beijings Tiananmen Square September 18, 2009. Reuters pic
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 5 Umno and the Communist Party of China (CPC) yesterday agreed to have youth leadership exchanges so that the youth leaders of both countries can have a better understanding of the economic and social development taking place in Malaysia and China.
Umno secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor, who signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on behalf of Umno on co-operation between Umno and the CPC in Beijing yesterday, said this was all the more timely as China was now a major economic power.
Wang Jiarui, Head of the International Liaison Department of the CPC Central Committee, represented the CPC.
On their part, they are amazed with our achievements and racial harmony and would like to learn from us how we were able to attain this harmony without any bloodshed, Tengku Adnan said in a statement to Bernama.
He said as a follow-up to the MOU, both countries agreed to set up a permanent mechanism to enable the exchanges to take place beginning this year. Bernama
< a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jejvIg_IG56boaTujl33vt4sSeU/1/da">
Young corporate Msians must not be held to ransom
FMT LETTER
From Lim Ka Joy, via e-mail
I still remember two months ago, during the campaigning period of the Sarawak state elections, the nights were dominated by the Pakatan Rakyat ceramahs. Demands for oversight and accountability werefeatured, as the candidates excoriated the ruling party for the failures and gaffes. As for me, I thrived on their rebukes on Prime Minister Najib Tun Razaks hallmark phrase, You help me, I help you.
I recall the stories my friends and cousins, who are part of the Malysian diaspora, told me. They told me the reasons why they left Malaysia. I recall the looks on their faces, in their eyes; the helplessness they felt as Malaysians; how the sense of abandonment was so painful for them.
There are many practices of the BN government which directly contributed to this. The government is not unaware of these faulty policies and practices. Many of us think that the government has either dismissed these issues or has plainly ignored them even when they were brought to their attention. I do not think that is the case.
Recently, at a dialogue organised by the Young Corporate Malaysians, Najib admitted that Malaysians are not earning the salaries that are commensurate with their skills.This statement proves that Najib has not been shielding himself from the problems ordinary Malaysians face and are going through on a daily basis! (Thats the good news!).
It is heartening to see that Najib is very much in touch with the sentiments on the ground with his spot-on analogy of the current situation faced by the working community of Malaysia. So as the current prime minister of Malaysia, what is he going to do?
Well, at the same dialogue, Najib promised to offer more opportunities for the young if they helped him secure his mandate in the coming general election. He told hundreds of young professionals that he would introduce younger faces into the ruling coalition and make wages more attractiv! e if Bar isan Nasional remained in power. (Poor, Najib! As he said, he took over mid-stream so he cannot do any major changes. However, if we give him the mandate, then well be able to make changes.)
What does this say? A prime minister who is concerned only with his own interests? Is this what we call People First, Performance Now? In my opinion, at the moment, it seems that he is entrenched in the corridor of power, oblivious to the cries of the common Malaysians.
Despite TalentCorp.s effort in luring Malaysians back, it is easy to give up on this country in view of the unprogressive stance on politics, education, economics and social issues. Many a time, I question my continued loyalty to Malaysia (partly because TalentCorp. is not rewarding Malaysians who have chosen to stay back).
I am inclined to think that it is definitely easier to remain apathetic, to ingratiatingly accept any promises and grab every handout in the form of financial assistance that BN throws at us during elections in the guise that it is the federal governments way of fulfilling its promises and manifestoes. But if this is going to be the reason for voting BN, then we are allowing the hegemony to persist in their power-mongering.
I am leaving aside the diatribes for these do not achieve anything. As a citizen, I know that Im an integral part of the arena. And as such, Im taking this opportunity to put forth my views, my worries and concerns, my hopes and expectations, to the government.
As Najib Tun Razak tells us that we should continue to give him and BN the mandate, he should perhaps pause and think for a moment. Granted a prime ministers job is never easy, but if Najib is talking about giving him the mandate during the next General Election, he must firstly earn our respect. People respect ministers for their dedication and love for the people rather than the love for power. Dignity and respect comes with genuine service.
We are Malaysians. Malaysia is not about BN and vice! versa. This is a lesson that every Malaysian, young and old, ought to remember. We want the best for Malaysia and our fellow Malaysians. We cannot let the electoral cycle determine what we can be as Malaysians.
We want a prime minister who would not place his priorities only on continued dominance, but on civic virtue. We want a government that truly cares and loves its people by putting them first on all levels.
And yes, we, too, want the 1Malaysia People First, Performance Now tagline to be in deed, not just a rhetoric catchphrase.
So youngsters, let not the people in the upper echelons of government hold our lives ransom. Take heart, have courage. Sapere aude. Dare to be wise, not let other people dictate what Malaysia should become.
Attracting The Best To Teaching
Attracting the Best To Teaching
M. Bakri Musa
www.bakrimusa.com
Early this year the US Department of Education, together with OECD and the Asia Society, convened a summit of education ministers, master teachers, and union leaders from 15 countries. The theme was on attracting, training and retaining the best teachers. Those were no ordinary countries participating; their students had consistently excelled in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA).
America has some of the finest private and public schools, while its colleges and universities regularly dominate anybodys list of the best. Yet there was US Education Secretary Duncan sponsoring this symposium and its opening speaker. That reflects the seriousness with which American leaders and policymakers consider education. It also shows their humility and commitment to learn from the best. I long for such traits in our leaders and educators.
The core assumption of the summit is that you cannot have excellent schools without excellent teachers. Great teachers are not just born that way, Secretary Duncan noted in his opening remarks. It takes a high-quality system for recruiting, training, retaining, and supporting teachers over the course of their careers to develop an effective teaching force, he continued.
This emphasis on schools and education is well placed. As OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria put it, The prosperity of our nations depends on whether we succeed to attract the brightest minds into the teaching profession, and the most talented teachers into the most challenging classrooms.
Pivotal Role of Teachers
You cannot have good schools without good teachers. Good teachers in turn come from good students, and good students need good schools in order to shine. This is not an extended version of the old chicken-and-egg riddle. Rather what these countries with exemplary schools and outstanding teachers have demonstrated is the pivotal pos! ition of the teacher. Finland and Singapore in particular have shown that you can indeed intervene to make teaching an attractive profession, the first-choice career of the talented.
In Finland teaching is a much-sought occupation, with ten applicants for every position! The teaching profession there attracts the best applicants in part because teachers get competitive pay. Singapore aggressively recruits from among the top third of its students, and those interested in and committed to teaching are paid while still in school.
Keen competition in itself is no indicator of quality. In Malaysia, there is a glut of applicants for religious teachers but no one dares claim that the applicant pool is made up of top-tier students. There is similar stiff competition to be teachers in Egypt, but its schools and students rank at the bottom in international comparisons. The reason is that the Egyptian economy is in such a rut that teaching is the only job available. The same dynamics apply to our religious teachers.
Recruiting top talent is only the beginning. Rookies enthusiasm will get you only so far. Teachers must also be given superior initial training; then there must be a mechanism for continuing professional education and training.
Finland has an exceptionally superior system; hence it is attracting the best talents. Teachers there get training to the level of a masters degree, even for primary school teachers. They are rightly treated as professionals because they are rigorously trained and more importantly, behave as such. They are also trained to be diagnosticians to recognize not only the different learning styles but also learning problems.
A unique feature of the Finnish system is that each teacher is also a researcher, participating in research in collaboration with the local university. The best way to keep abreast in your field is to be involved in research even if only tangentially.
Being true professionals, Finnish teachers have considerable autonomy, as a! re their schools. The Finnish Ministry of Education is more a resource center than a command-and-control one. Its bureaucrats are not control freaks.
Those countries are also actively widening the pool talent for recruitment to include those from underrepresented minorities and those seeking mid-career change. This has particular relevance for Malaysia; it too must aggressively recruit from among Orang Asli and other minority groups especially of East Malaysia. It is important for minority students to have role models from among the teachers.
No professional would be satisfied unless he or she is assured of career advancement as well as appropriate reward and recognition for a job well done. In Singapore teachers are career tacked to be master teachers, school leaders, or specialist in curriculum or research. The government regularly tracks what competing sectors are paying their workers in order that teachers remain competitively paid.
Reforming Schools
The other significant lesson from the summit is that school reforms when effectively executed can bear positive results quickly. Poland is an example. It initiated reform only in the late 1990s but within a decade it has dramatically reduced the number of its poorly performing students and cut in half the variations in performance among its schools. Previously Polish students regularly perform at below average level of OECD countries; after reform they were on par with Americans.
Reforming school is the rage everywhere, Malaysia included. The consensus at this conference is that teachers must both be the active agents for and effective implementers of reform.
This creates a dilemma for Malaysia. Where teachers are well trained, thoroughly professional and highly effective as they are in the Scandinavian countries, they should be actively involved with the reform process. In Malaysia however, our teaching profession is far from that. It has been significantly degraded with respect to standards and ! professi onalism, as reflected in the quality of their products the students.
Having been brought up under the current system it would be unrealistic to expect these teachers to be agents or advocates for change. Their position is essentially that the system was good enough for them; it should be good enough for the present and future generations. Stated differently, current teachers are part of the problem, not of the solution. This does not mean that they cannot be trained or persuaded to be part of the solution, but we should not underestimate the difficulties and challenges.
The reform in Poland was, as expected of a former communist country, a top-down affair. Yet it was highly successful. Likewise in Singapore; no surprise there either, but it was also effective. A generation ago Singapore faced problems similar to what Malaysia faces today where teaching was not the first choice career for its top students.
Thailand too has its Malaysian problem; the Thais solved it in their own unique patient way. Recognizing the futility of persuading these teachers to agree for reform, the government simply bypassed them by liberalizing the school sector to foreign players. Consequently, international schools blossomed in Thailand. Yes, they are an option only for the elite and rich. These schools are educating the children of the influential. These students are destined to hold key positions in their country, their superior education and social standing assured them of that. They would be the ones to lead successful reforms in the future.
In reforming Malaysian schools, we could pursue either the top-down approach of Poland and Singapore, or use the slower and surer Thai way. However, I do not see the necessary enlightened and intelligent leadership to effect meaningful top-down reform, nor do I see a farsighted leadership to initiate the slow Thai way.
Quality of Schools and Fertility Rates
On perusing the list of countries whose students excelled in ! PISA, on e fact stands out: Those countries also have low fertility rates. The latest addition to the list of top performers is China, specifically Shanghai. Chinas almost inhuman one-child policy has many critics but there is no questioning its benefits. For the past few decades China was spared the burden of feeding and housing over 300 million potential Chinese. Imagine the savings in not having another Bangladesh within your borders! Spared of those huge expenses, the Chinese could now divert resources to improving their schools.
The reverse however is not true; low fertility rates alone do not guarantee good schools. Sri Lanka is proof of that.
In Malaysia, the fertility rate for Malays, while declining, is still nearly doubled that of non-Malays. The wide discrepancy in academic achievement and other social indices between Malays and non-Malays is ultimately attributed in part to this difference in fertility rates.
If today the authorities were to implement an effective and acceptable family planning program that is enthusiastically endorsed by the religious authorities, the positive impact would be felt almost immediately. First, there will be the drop in the number of pregnancies, and nine months later the decline in the number of births. With that the savings in expenses related to medical care. That would only be the beginning. Six years later when those potential babies would be ready for school, the savings would be even greater as there would be no need for new schools and teachers.
Even more remarkable, those savings would be cumulative; they would continue to add up. With those savings we could then expend resources towards improving the quality of life of our people, and that would include providing them with good schools and superior teachers.
Those OECD and other advanced countries can focus on making their schools superior because they have the resources to do so; they have been spared the expenses that would have been incurred had they had high fertil! ity rate s. This basic link was not discussed at the summit as it was taken for granted. For Malaysia however, it is a reality that is not yet even acknowledged, much less addressed.
The wisdom of those eminent educators from OECD displayed at the summit is still valid, and Malaysia could usefully adopt them provided our leaders and policymakers bear in mind that we have a more basic problem outside the realm of education but related to it. We have to tame our fertility rates first; then with the savings we would have the resources to address the challenges of education.
1Malaysia = Yellow Undie
1Malaysia dah deman KUNING....
















Bahaya mendengar dan mendendangkan lagu2 popular 'Lancang Kuning' dan 'Yellow Submarine'
semua ini gara-gara gomen dan pihak berkuasa kita yang fobia dengan warna kuning....
cheers.















