Sabah Umno members told to gear up for GE
Rafidah: Forget 1Melayu, 1Bumi concept
She said that unlike their counterparts in Singapore and Thailand, Malays in Malaysia are distinct as they have special rights as constituted by the Federal Constitution.The 1Melayu, 1Bumi campaign calls for all Malay parties to form one large coalition to combat the united force of Chinese in Malaysia, and was roundly criticised by Chinese political parties, mainly the DAP and MCA.
Samy poised for one last kill?
There are those in his circle who are coaxing him to give Palanivel a chance, that with the right advice, the latter can be persuaded to see things in a different light. But Samy Vellu remains skeptical.According to the source, a senior party leader now has direct access to the presidents ear, and it is this person who is controlling the party while Palanivel is merely tapping his feet to the Hindi tune.
Like it or not, the old man still has clout in the party, and if push comes to shove, he may just back (deputy president) Dr S Subramaniam in the presidential polls and finish off Palanivel.Speaking to FMT, a Palanivel supporter defended the president, saying that he is merely democratising a party which has endured three decades of iron-clad rule.
Gadhafis youngest son killed but Libyan leader survives NATO missile strike
Najib Yang Lulus Lesen Judi Bola, Bukan DAP
Kata Najib:
Kenapa buat baik dengan DAP? Adakah DAP boleh perjuangkan Islam?
Hadi (Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang), cukup-cukuplah dengan DAP, tinggalkan DAP, masuk BN, kata Perdana Menteri ketika berucap pada majlis Perjumpaan Mesra Perdana Menteri Bersama Rakyat Dewan Undangan Negeri kawasan Manir di Kampung Pulau Bahagia dekat sini.
Kalau ditakdirkan hari tu PAS terima tawaran UMNO/BN/Najib yang disampaikan melalui Task Force2010, maka PAS terpaksa menyokong judi bola yang diluluskan Najib kepada Vinsetan?
Adakah itu perjuangan Islam yang Dato Najib hendak tawar kepada PAS?
TUlang Besi
Faith Healers: Heal Thyself, Or Stop Your Rubbish!
Pepper Lim dispels the myth of faith healing and offers to help faith healers win US$1 million! The charismatic lady in a flowing dress lays her hands on sick people on stage. Then, in a loud, commanding voice, she proclaims them healed. So it was with Kathryn Kulmans "healing rallies" in the 1960s. Many sick people flocked to such events hoping to be healed by the power of god. Such "laying on of hands healing" or "faith healing" are still carried out today with little evidence of effect. And, indeed, you need to have faith to believe someone can heal you by laying their hands on you and commanding, "You are healed!" in a loud voice! I used to believe in such miraculous powers many years ago. One day, it dawned on me that I have never actually witnessed a completed healing miracle even though I have attended numerous healing events, one so large it was held in Stadium Merdeka. Kathryn Kuhlman in her heyday. | Source: www.discerningtheworld.comI saw the preachers praying for the sick and declaring them healed but I have never seen an actual miracle. Through such prayers and healing services, a blind man has never regained his sight, cancer tumours have never vanished, the crippled have never walked nor have the deaf regained their hearing. I am also guilty of such antics. I have laid my hands on the sick and expected them to be healed by a supernatural power. Years ago, I read many accounts of such a power and I studied it, practiced it and even preached about it. But to my utter horror no one ever recovered from their illness through my prayers. Thus, I have to come to the painful conclusion that it just does not work. The Cochrane Library cites a research in 10 databases which conducted experiments on the effects of prayer and the conclusion is: prayer has little or no effect. Think about it, if prayer can heal, ! why does not the preacher visit hospitals to heal the sick? No "healing evangelist" has ever done such a thing. I suspect it is because they cannot heal squat! One preacher explanation from the pulpit of his church that sick people are not healed because they do not want to be healed. This includes people who say they want to be healed but secretly hope otherwise. What rubbish! Can you imagine a man with a family who is crippled from an accident who would rather stay crippled at home, unable to work, unable to play with his children and unable to enjoy life? Another preacher explained the lack of healing is the fault of the sick person "lacking faith that god can heal." Again, what utter rubbish! If god can heal, why would he need the help of the sick persons faith. In 2008, 16-year old Neil Beagley died when his parents refused conventional medical care for him because they relied on their faith to seek gods healing for their son. Was their faith not enough for gods healing? Or is it more logical to say "god does not heal"? Another couple, Carl and Raylene Worthington, lost their 15-month old daughter to faith healing and refused conventional medical care. Both of these couples were charged under criminal mistreatment and manslaughter. And rightly so if you refuse a person in need of medical treatment and cause their death, you should also be held accountable. It is inconceivable for educated adults to rely on such beliefs for the well being of their children to the point of being dead wrong. Believing in garden fairies is one thing but believing in faith healing to the point of causing the death of children is gravely irresponsible. In a report by Child Fatalities From Religion-motivated Medical Neglect, it states: "One hundred forty fatalities were from conditions for which survival rates with medical care would have exceeded 90%. Eighteen more had expected survival rates of >50%. All but 3 of the remainder would likely have had some benefit from clinical help." Is that not proof enough that faith healing is bunkum? There have been many TV documentaries exposing such healing shenanigans too. One of my favourites is A Question of Miracles: Faith Healing (hopefully the link is still working so you can watch it online for free). This documentary goes behind the scenes of "healing preachers" like Benny Hinn who claims to have healed thousands of sick people. Yet, none of these people have ever been medically proven to be healed supernaturally. A Christian doctor I met once told me god heals through doctors. Again, what rubbish! He might as well say he make the flowers bloom every year or the dew to appear on leaves every morning. Would you believe him? What if he added the phrase "through the power of god"? Now would you believe him? When challenged to produce evidence of supernatural healing, the preachers would cite instances where they saw the medical reports but have never been able to reproduce a copy for the world to see. Such testimonies cannot be accepted as evidence. They are merely hearsay. Mr Preacherman, if you do believe you are endowed with the supernatural power of god to heal the sick, how about a little challenge? I challenge you to walk into a hospital and heal the sick patients there. Let us see those cancer cells disappear, show us how to make the lame walk, save the doctor time on the operating table, make the broken bones fuse back to its original place, open the ears of the deaf and what not. Hey, if you could kill the germs in the hospital and keep it sanitised for a week, I would be impressed too. I could even arrange for you to receive US$1 million as a reward! If not, stop telling sick people that god heals and point them to the nearest doctor. That doctor studied medicine for five years and had to pass rigorous exams. You did not. Pepper Lim prefers to use logic and evidence when presented with seemingly miraculous events. He writes from firsthand experience being involved with faith healers for many year! s. For t his article, he has referred to the works of James Randi, Penn & Teller, Derren Brown and others. And he still has plans to make his parents proud. Tags: Benny Hinn, Christian, Christianity, Derren Brown, evangelism, faith healing, healing rallies, healing rally, James Randi, medical neglect, medicine, miracles, Neil Beagley, Penn & Teller, Pepper Lim, Religion This entry was posted on 2 May, 2011 at 12:00 pm and is filed under Pray For Me. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. 
Serangan Video Seks Kali Ini Sempena Muktamar PAS
Najib dan juak2 UMNO sedar perkara ini adalah hampir mustahil. Ini kerana pada tahun 1986 dahulu sewaktu PAS mendapat hanya satu kerusi Parlimen, undi popular PAS di kalangan orang Melayu mencecah 40%. Maka, tidak mungkin dalam keadaan PAS berada dalam beberapa kerajaan negeri sekarang ini, PAS tidak dapat menjamin undi Melayu lebih dari 40%?
Maka, satu-satu jalan bagi menjamin undi Melayu yang solid kepada UMNO dan BN adalah dengan mengeluarkan PAS dari Pakatan Rakyat.
Percubaan pertama mereka gagal sejurus selepas pilihanraya 2008. Namun, pimpinan2 PAS yang pro kepada PERPADUANG dengan UMNO itu masih lagi memegang tampuk pemerintahan PAS.
Maka, serangan kedua Video BLue Rahim Thamby Chik dilancarkan bagi menguatkan kedudukan kepimpinan PAS yang pro PERPADUANG itu di dalam menghadapi pemilihan PAS Jun ini.
Najib tahu, PAS duduk di dalam Pakatan Rakyat hanya kerana faktor Anwar Ibrahim. Serangan fitnah Video Blue Rahim ini diharapkan dapat melemahkan keyakinan sebahagian besar kepimpinan PAS terhadap Anwar Ibrahim.
Apabila itu berlaku, maka secara otomatik fraksi UMNO akan berjaya memacu usaha mereka ke arah "Perpaduang" dengan UMNO dan Barisan Nasional.
Tak hairanlah Najib Tun Razak terlalak-lalak meminta PAS masuk BN untuk melaksanakan Islam dan meninggalkan PAKATAN.
Tulang Besi seperti ingat lupa, siapa yang luluskan lesen judi bola? DAP atau Najib Tun Razak?
Tulang Besi
GE13 is a Sex Carnival
The fact that the number 13 is freighted with an ominous significance because it connotes a tragic chapter in Malaysian history - the May 13 riots of 1969 - lends added frisson to the anticipation.
The thunderheads that have boiled up on the political horizon to set voters on edge present an idiosyncratic mix of issues of personal sexual morality and ones of grave national import.
NONEJust now an issue concerning the sexual morals of a contender for the prime ministerial position, Anwar Ibrahim, has taken centre stage, to the exasperation of legions of his supporters, not because they do not think that it matters, but because they view the rules for adjudicating it as hopelessly rigged against him.
Also, it is of little help to their serenity that they see at least one of his accusers, in the case of the video allegedly showing him in a transaction with a sex worker, as tainted with same brush that is now being used to blacken Anwar. Few things are as annoying as the pot calling the kettle black.
Likewise, few things can be more exasperating that attempts to infer an aspirant's moral credentials to govern from his or her private sexual morals.
One does not have to subscribe to Plato's dualism of the mind and body to hold that it's best to keep the spheres of public and private morality separate, especially private sexual morality.
But because to the majority of Malaysians religion is a public matter, these spheres cannot be held to be separate.
No politician has done more in the last four decades in Malaysia to make religion a public matter than Anwar Ibrahim. So there is a rough kind of poetic justice to the travails he has now to endure.
No precedent in modern history
It is hard to find a precedent in modern history for the very public and humiliating trials by innuendo and insinuation he and his family have had to endure - in Sodomy I, Sodomy II and now in the sex video controversy - over the last 13 years.
Perhaps the closest comparison one could find would be the hounding of the American civil rights Martin Luther King Jr by FBI director J Edgar Hoover in the 1960s.
Hoover kept up a steady stream of pressure on King and his wife by circulating aural evidence of the civil rights leader's sexual misdemeanors. But, in the main, that pressure was applied away from the public gaze. Consequently, the psychic hell that King and Coretta had to endure was private.
NONEIn contrast, Anwar and family have had to endure very public tribulation which the ordinarily decent are loath to justify.
The fact that elementary standards of due process have been denied him in this odyssey of public humiliation adds to the repugnance felt by the decent over his and his family's treatment.
That is why at this juncture the 13th general election is being awaited with mustard-keen anticipation.
There are issues of grave public moment that should compete for the public's attention but right now the manufactured sensation of Anwar's private sexual morality has taken centre stage.
It makes you want to believe in the truth of the concept of the wound and the bow, the literary principle that the psychic wounds one suffers on the way up in life become the bow that launches the effort at grand rectification.
One hopes that would be true about Anwar. He has had to endure much; would that eventual vindication and rectification be proportionate to his travails.
TERENCE NETTO has been a journalist for close on four decades. He likes the occupation because it puts him in contact with the eminent without being under the necessity to admire them. It is the ideal occupation for a temperament that finds power fascinating and its exercise abhorrent.
1 Malaysia School Another rebranding..
1. I stumbled upon an article in the alternative media that the government is now looking at the development of 1 school as a measure of long term integration among the DIVIDED people in Malaysia. In Malaysia, there is a saying sekali air bah, sekali pantai berubah. Every new PM comes, the whole country direction change. A single long term strategy for the country is never clear to the people. Before we had Sekolah wawasan which had failed miserably and now it is 1M school.
2. To the opposition of abolishment of VC they will sight Article 152 where they say the VC is guaranteed by the FC and the issue of QUALITY. The truth is far from that. Article 152 did not say that. It says:
The national language shall be the Malay language and shall be in such script as
Parliament may by law* provide:
Provided that-
no person shall be prohibited or prevented from using (otherwise than for official
purposes), or from teaching or learning, any other language; and
nothing in this Clause shall prejudice the right of the Federal Government or of any State
Government to preserve and sustain the use and study of the language of any other
community in the Federation.
3. Quality issues can be addressed. It is not rocket science. In fact we can use the system in the VC if it is good. The word SYSTEM must be differentiated from the language used. It is two different issues. In fact we should use Article 152, in enhancing community languages across ethnic groups to enhances the bond between the people.
4. What is clear is that national school must deviate from its current incliniation of becoming religious school. The teaching of religion is important to all. Therefore they must be thought after the official school hours. The teaching of community language and survival skill must be enhanced during the official school hours. The learning of community language must be e! ncourage d among all students. In the current scenario, the survival skills include communication, mathematics, science and world studies. World studies includes history and geography.
5. Right now the people continue to be divided as we have politicians who sees the interest of the country is secondary compared to the preservation of the ethnic identities. They are making popular decision and not the right decision. How long shall we keep this kind of people in the office and running the country?
US$1.3b for voters: Is it boodle?
Depending of how one actually looks at it, Singapore authorities would have distributed some US1.3 billion to all its citizens by polling day next Saturday.
The total sum was promised in a parliamentary debate this year to help offset the pain caused by persistently, high cost of living. The amount of monies to be distributed varies according to the age and income groups.
So regardless of whether it is a millionaire living in gilded and leafy Bukit Timah, or a struggling cab driver breaking the bonds of impecunious poverty in a three-room public housing apartment, the funds will be distributed all the same.
There is no distinction between income groups and no means tested mechanism to justify the payouts based on needs and wants.
The only thing that varies is the amount to be given out. Permanent residents who are disallowed from voting on polling day on 7th May will get nothing.
It always is tempting to label the ruling Peoples Action Party (PAP) as a clique with a heart but that hardly seems to be the case.
If anything it amounts to grandstanding for the act of making huge payouts only happens whenever an election is called. It happened shortly before the 2006 elections and it also happened before the 2001 elections.
Predictably most in the country were not amused by the payouts which in the main are nothing more than symbolic gestures of supposed human fellowship and bereft of any real commitment to remove the real seeds of disaffection. Poverty in the country is artfully disguised and not made to show in official government statistics.
It will be a shame if people think that this government is generous, declared a professional living in the hotly contested electoral wa! rd of Al junied that is widely forecast to fall into opposition hands on Saturday and thereby reduce the ruling partys parliamentary and poll majorities.
The rising cost of living, exorbitantly high public housing and the indiscriminate influx of foreigners who are abetting in those increases are fuelling anger and alienation in the nation that since 1959 has only been ruled by the Peoples Action Party (PAP).
A defensive PAP
For the first time it now seems, it is beginning to appear it is the PAP that is now on the defensive with its back to the wall.
At most PAP rallies there has been no mention of how it plans to tackle the growing socio-economic divide in the country growing exponentially year after year. And there is also no mention of how the PAP plans to lower the rising cost of public housing.
There is a real possibility of a bursting of the housing bubble in the years ahead if the government withdraws from providing assistance to opposition-held wards intoned a businessman in the West Coast Group Representation Council (GRC).
(Singapores electoral precincts are divided in GRCs to allow minority race representation in parliament though critics have charged it amounts to gerrymandering to keep the ruling party in power).
He was referring to home owners defaulting on their bank loans because of the PAPs threat to withdraw public assistance services and thereby cause the prices of their homes to tumble.
It is somewhat well documented that PAP resorts to witch-hunts and revenge attacks whenever and wherever it is voted out of constituencies; something the public first got an espy of in 1984 when then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew famously quipped of changing the one-man, one vote system and then telling his countrymen of a possible withdrawal of services to constituencies that voted against the PAP.
Lee had argued such a practice, i.e. withdrawal of public services, is necessary because it forms part of the learning process.
!Indee d what has happened since then is a converse form of learning. Opposition-held wards continue to turn in parliamentarians from opposition groups, as how it has been in Potong Pasir since 1984 and Hougang since 1991.
From an ideological standpoint it is not hard to understand the PAPs entrenched aversion to welfare, or even any remote, watered-down or sanitised notion of it.
Bussed to rallies
It has always argued that welfarism weakens a mans spirit and robs a nations of its productive potential.
That must have been the case back in the 1960s but the kind of welfarism or measures of it required these days, is far from the circumstances that prevailed in the 1960s.
That welfarism is bad has always been the PAPs guiding credo and if the Singapore public knows it any better, it first came to the fore when the city-states then Chief Minister, David Marshall was unceremoniously thumbed down in a parliamentary debate in 1963, when arguing for a tweaking of the nest egg savings institutionalised in the nations Central Provident Fund (CPF) for it to be applied for medical expenses for the young and aged sick.
Yet the perception is fast gaining ground that the PAP is running with its tail between its legs. They seemed resigned to losing Aljunied GRC and are also beginning to appear desperate.
Eye witness accounts say elderly citizens on evening jaunts were rounded up in Jurong and western parts of the country and herded over in buses to PAP election rallies that to the ruling partys dismay have been seeing historically low levels of audience attendances!
Wonder if that too, is something of a boodle?
Maxwell Coopers in a freelance writer based in Singapore.
Ask Lord Bobo: Party Whipping Can Be More Meaningful
From the Selangor Times Issue 21, 22-24 April 2011. Ask Lord Bobo is a weekly column by LoyarBurok where all your profound, abstruse, erudite, hermetic, recondite, sagacious, and other thesaurus-described queries are answered! This week, His Supreme Eminenceness jabbers on about political ideologies, the whip system, and the role of a spouse. Dear Lord Bobo, What political ideology do you most identify with? @adriene, via Twitter Dearest @adriene for anyone who sends in an average of 172 questions a week to this column cannot be anything but very dear to us you obviously spend a lot of time asking what, why, how, when, where, which, who, and what the? His Supreme Eminenceness expects you must be a highly intelligent, if not puzzled, individual or likely both at the same time. Lord Bobo has, in our unquestionably superior wisdom, deigned to answer three of your questions this week, despite their individual flaws. With regard to political ideology, the question is flawed because His Supreme Eminenceness cannot be categorised into boxes and labels conceptualised by feeble humans. Many of Lord Bobos earthly minions have sought to become more intimate with Lord Bobo (no, not in that way) through meditation scented by roasting purple bananas, floating on Amazonian rivers in a banana boat, and even wolfing down banana splits. And still they keep trying, for while His Supreme Eminenceness ways remain a mystery, there is much enlightenment in the journey. To get a peek at the "ideologies" approved by His Lordship, read the blawg. Common issues published there include the fight for individual liberty (from freedom of expression to religion to assembly) some may interpret this as being a liberal. Also common are issues conce! rning th e collective good & social justice (like ethnic discrimination, oppression faced indigenous people and the poor) some say this reeks of socialism. But this method is flawed, as it does not reveal a "political ideology". Perhaps the one true defining principle that His Supreme Eminenceness holds to is the freedom of expression, and love (despite some unenlightened ones claiming that love is an illusion). That seems the only common thread that one can weave through posts on patriotism and love for Malaysia (#WhyMalaysia), football, music, events, human rights, language, politics, activism, education, fiction, film, books, food the list truly is endless almost as endless as Arsenals search for a trophy. And so, fret not over such definitions or labels. For Lord Bobo is unclassifiable. His Supreme Eminenceness is both darkness and light; earth, wind, and fire; ebony and ivory; ape and monkey. Free your mind. Free your spirit. Whats the point of debate in the legislatures in Malaysia when lawmakers vote according to the party line instead of conscience? The same person who asked the first question, via the same method This question is flawed because it is premised on the assumption that actual "debate" takes place amongst Malaysian lawmakers as opposed to petty accusations, name-calling, and limelight-hogging. But anyway. Parliaments in Commonwealth countries often practice a certain convention in the august house by electing/appointing an official called the "whip". The function of a whip official (usually an MP appointed/elected from the same party) is to enforce party discipline in legislatures by making sure MPs from their own party vote according to party lines. Whips also ensure MPs are in attendance when important votes are taken. The usage of "whip" comes from the hunting "whipping in", ie preventing hounds from wandering away from the pack. Different Parliaments have different practice of the whip system. Some are more strict and ! dogmatic than others. Some Commonwealth countries even do away with such practice altogether because it tends to breed partisanship across the floor and causes internal conflicts when MPs within the party disagree. A recent controversy regarding the practice of the whip system in Malaysia was in 2006 when Shahrir Abdul Samad (BN-Johor Bahru) decided to vote in support of an opposition motion led by Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Ipoh Timur) to refer allegations of graft and corruption by an anonymous MP to the House Rights & Privileges Committee for investigation. He was the only government MP in support of the opposition-led motion. It was insinuated by BN party leadership later on that he would have been sacked if not for his voluntary resignation, for voting against the whip. UMNO subsequently issued a formal directive that all BN MPs must vote according to party line, regardless of personal convictions or the merits of the motions raised. To Lord Bobo, the practice of the whip system has it merits, but it can be practised in a much more meaningful manner, for example by enforcing attendance amongst MPs during house sittings through the pairing of MPs across the floor for debate and voting of motions in the house. This application of whip system will encourage debate on all issues in the house and ultimately benefit the interest of the country by putting national interests above party interests. By Malaysian law, what role is the spouse of the Prime Minister meant to play, if any? The same person who asked the first two questions, via the same method The question is again flawed because it assumes that law in Malaysia plays a primary role in shaping what happens in the country. Nevertheless, an intriguing query. Upon applying Pythagorean theorem, Cartesian geometry, Newtons infinitesimal calculus, consulting the alignment of celestial bodies and the principles of karmic astrology, using I-Chings system of divination, performing Crowleys sex magick ritual and examining a plet! hora of literature including the Statutes of Murphy, the heretical Analects of the Sith, the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, and the Battle Hymn of a Tiger Mother, His Supreme Eminenceness has distilled the approach to arrive at the answer into the following formula: One Minus One Times Three Million Eight Hundred Ninety One Thousand and Five Hundred Twenty Six Point Three Three Seven. And no, we did not consult the Federal Constitution. Why bother? No one else does these days! It is arguably more important to refer to a certain (Pasir Mas) MPs recent statement that wives are supposed to stop everything to fulfill their husbands demands. That anachronistic view goes against a core value which human rights seek to protect, namely the dignity of the individual. But, as an MP said it, it must be true. Have a question for Lord Bobo? Call on His Supreme Eminenceness by emailing asklordbobo@loyarburok.com, stating your full name, and a pseudonym (if you want), or tweeting your questions by mentioning @LoyarBurok and using the hashtag #asklordbobo. The first 100 questions published will receive monkey-riffic LoyarBurok merchandise courtesy of Selangor Times. What the hell are you waiting for? Hear This, and Tremblingly Obey (although trembling is optional if you are somewhere very warm)! Liberavi Animam Meam! I Have Freed My Spirit! Tags: Arsenal, Ask Lord Bobo, Barisan Nasional, BN, DAP, Federal Constitution, Human Rights, Liberal, liberalism, Lim Kit Siang, Lord Bobo Barnabus, Love, Malaysia, Parliament, Parlimen, Pasir Mas, political ideology, Politics, Selangor Times, Shahrir Abdul Samad, social justice, Socialism, socialist, UMNO, whip system This entry was posted on 2 May, 2011 at 8:00 am and is filed under Ask Lord Bobo. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. 
Najib wont be PM after next GE
On MCAs stand on cabinet positions, Chuas retort was:I say, if (MCA president) Dr Chua Soi Lek and MCA members dont want to be in the cabinet good luck to you, nobody will miss you.Malaysia in the Era of Globalization #63
Chapter 8: Culture, Institutions, and Leadership
Negeri endah kerana penghulu. (Great nation, great leader.)
Ancient Malay Proverb
There is now gradually emerging a common Malaysian culture. Part of this is the result of a deliberate official policy, but more likely it is the natural consequence of people living and working together. I posit this process would have gone further had there been no governmental policy promoting a common culture. It is a predictable human reaction to be defensive and protective of ones heritage when threatened.
In America there is no stated policy of Americanizing new immigrants, nonetheless new arrivals are always eager to join the mainstream. Within a generation, new Americans are already fully acculturated. Similarly, early Chinese immigrants to Malaysia, the Straits Chinese, readily adopted the Malay language and way of life precisely because the government and polity of the day were not harping on the issue of a national culture. Likewise, early Indian Muslim immigrants to northern Malaysia blended easily with native Malays, aided undoubtedly by the commonality of religion. Mamak Malays, as they are called, are fast vanishing as a subculture as they have become completely assimilated, with some becoming ministers and even Prime Minister!
This common Malaysian culture may not be apparent to those living in Malaysia as the evolution is subtle, but it is there. It is certainly obvious to foreigners and Malaysians residing abroad. I can always tell a group of Malaysians regardless of whether they are Malays or non-Malays. The obvious give away is the language. I do not mean the distinctive Malaysian accent or such peculiarly local habit as ending every word and expression with lah, rather the sentence structure, manner, and style of language. Many linguists now recognize Malaysian English as a distinct entity: Manglish. Appropriate enough name, for to the uninitiated it does appear! that th e language is being mangled. Case in point is the tendency to verbalize nouns as in, I story you one day, meaning, I will tell you the story or explain it to you one day. Similarly, I off the air-conditioner, meaning, I have turned it off.
When Malaysians travel in a group abroad they love to display their identity by wearing the same set or colors of clothing. Of course Malaysian-tailored suits are a dead giveaway! As the locals would say, Taada cutting lah! (No style!) To be sure, Malaysians are not as self-conscious of their group identity as the Japanese, who would typically line up behind their banner-carrying leader.
Another distinctively Malaysian cultural trademark is the utter lack of respect for time and punctuality. I have never been to a Malaysian function that started on time. Delayed events happen even in the West, but what is remarkable is the utter lack of a sense of urgency among Malaysians when things are tardy. Foreigners in Malaysia discover soon enough the concept of Malaysian time.
I recently received an e-mail enquiry from a non-Malaysian editor in Malaysia about excerpting my first book in his publication. I replied immediately, as I do all my e-mails. It is no sweat; all I have to do is click the reply button and type a few words. No stamps to lick or envelope to stuff. Imagine my amusement when he responded back that I must have left Malaysia a very long time ago as I have lost that Malaysian habit of ignoring enquiries!
Similarly, ostentatious living, in particular lavish weddings, luxury cars, and first class travel, is fast becoming a Malaysian cultural artifact. Senior Malaysian government officials routinely travel first class and stay at five-star hotels. If comparable California state officials were to do the same, they would be publicly excoriated for wasting taxpayers money. And California is many times wealthier than Malaysia! Nor are such extravagances restricted only to g! overnmen t officials. Even university deans and external examiners are given first class air tickets, while at the same time claiming that they have no funds for their libraries and laboratories. Misplaced priorities!
Similarly with mega weddings; initially they were restricted to royal families. Today children of every big shot fancy themselves as princes and princesses. Each wedding appears more gaudy and lavish than the previous one. The recent marriage of Abdullah Badawis daughter was even more spectacular than that of a princess, and topped the earlier extravaganza for Sammy Vellus (a federal minister) son. There was no sense of embarrassment on the part of the participants. I shudder to imagine the next real royal wedding. Malaysians, and Malays in particular, take to heart the tradition of the wedding couple being the king and queen for the day.
The gala wedding of Abdullah Badawis daughter deserves scrutiny for another reason. A recent editorial in the New Straits Times, the mainstream paper owned by the ruling party, carried a laudatory piece on the deputy prime minister. One of the items mentioned was that the man did not even own a house; he had sold it earlier presumably to finance his daughters education. Very praiseworthy! The article went on to highlight Badawis humble and common origin. Obviously the essayist was totally oblivious of that recent mega wedding which was so generously covered by his own paper! Badawi may not be able to afford even a terrace house, but he sure could put on a lavish wedding. And this man has no qualms on lecturing Malays to be prudent in our ways!
On a positive note, another Malaysian tradition is the open house to celebrate festivities. This was initially a Malay phenomenon for Hari Raya but it has now spread to other festivities including Christmas and Chinese New Year. Undoubtedly sociologists will find other common elements among Malaysians.
These will undoubtedly increase as M! alaysian s become more integrated. Such commonalities aside, Malaysians still very much retain their distinct and diverse cultures. Unlike Americans, Malaysians do not subscribe to the melting pot theory, preferring its own salad bowl model instead, where each element retains its own distinctive color and flavor. In their totality the various ingredients create a unique blend that is the Malaysian culture.
It is generally recognized that Malay culture is the defining characteristic of the Malaysian culture. An extreme few would have Malay culture be the Malaysian culture, but this is nothing more than the conceit of control freaks who feel that they could impose their views on such an elusive entity as culture. To pursue the culinary metaphor, Malay culture is the lettuce or greenery of the rojak (salad), the dominant or primary component. There may be other ingredients like onions and black olives, but they are there to enhance the overall flavor and appearance. Too strong an onion or too many black olives, and the overall flavor will be spoiled or it would no longer be recognized as rojak.
In my discussion here on the role of culture in contemporary Malaysia, I am purposely restricting myself to the culture of Malays. I do this for two reasons. One, it is the defining culture and more importantly, the culture of the ruling elite. Two, I am familiar with it as it is also my own culture. By doing this I do not mean to denigrate or dismiss the other cultures that make up the Malaysian mosaic.
Next: Economic Culture of Malays
Pakatan forms shadow cabinet in Sarawak
Wong Ho Leng, who has been named the Opposition Leader, said that those assigned to the various portfolios would have to come up with regular reports on their portfolios.
This will enable us to know the overall performances of the state government, he told reporters after meeting PRK leaders.
Apart from being assigned to the respective portfolio, the shadow cabinet members are expected to come up with alternative and constructive proposals to government policies or suggestions.
The shadow member responsible (for a particular portfolio) will have to come with alternative and constructive proposals. DAP, PKR and PAS will never come up with proposals that are destructive, he said, pointing out that the shadow cabinet became effective today.
Wong, who is the Bukit Assek rep and state DAP chief, said that they will be actively taking part in the debates and will study all the proposals by the state government in this coming state assembly sitting.
They will have to tackle and handle matters concerning their portfolios immediately, he said, believing that the shadow cabinet will be effective in keeping tabs of the performances of the ministers and their ministries.
We dont want state ministers to answer our questions cincai-cincai and without knowing their ministries well, he said.
The list of portfolios is as follows:
Natural Resources and Good Governance Wong Ho Leng;
Land Development and NCR Affairs Baru Bian;
Finance Chong Chieng Jen;
Local Government Ling Sie Kiong;
Tourism, Heritage ! and Envi ronment See Chee How;
Rural Development Chiew Chiu Sing;
Industrial Development Yap Hoi Liong;
Public Health Dr Wong Hua Seh;
Social Development and Woman Affairs Violet Yong Wui Wui;
Public Utilities Wong King Wei;
Infrastructure Development and Communications Chiew Wang See;
Agriculture Ting Tze Fui;
Housing and Urban Development Fong Pau Teck;
Consumer Affairs David Wong Kee Woan;
Religious Affairs and National Unity Ali Biju and Haji Adam.
Ulama leadership must be upheld, protected
Since the party reinvented iself in 1998 when it joined the likes of DAP to support former deputy premier Anwar Ibrahim, who is now the embattled opposition leader, PAS is mostly centred among the professionals versus ulama factions.
There is a middle ground such as PAS strongman Mohammad Sabu who is said to enjoy comfort between the two groups but by and large, a debate persist, especially now after the party is reeling from a set of poor electoral performances in the Malay heartland seats.
Delegates would once again be transfixed next month whether they should vote in an aging ulama leadership or settle for the upstarts, the younger, moderate and accommodating professional groups.
According to party observers, the partys leadership has an almost balance composition of professionals and ulama in its central committee, balancing each other out.
The ulama is linked to president Abdul Hadi Awang who by reputation is defined as a hardline cleric while the professionals are linked to the reformist-minded Anwar.
The exception is the party deputy president Nasharudin Mat Isa who was once linked with the professionals and then the ulama, while now, he is seen to have status of being neither here nor there.
This makes the post he is holding open to all forms of speculation with the likes of Mohammad Sabu, Kedah Menteri Besar Azizan Abdul Razak, party vice-president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Mat and Kelantan PAS deputy commissioner III Husam Musa linked to contesting it.
Pick the one with the best credentials
The slogan of kepimpingan menerusi ulama (ulama leadership of PAS), is now often cited as a clarion call in the PAS grassroots meetings from its branches to area (divisional ) levels.
A total of 179 areas would conduct its meeting by the middle of next month to file nominations of party leaders and to select delegates for the annual PAS muktamar from June 2 until June 5 in Kuala Lumpur.
Former PAS secretary-general Kamarudin Jaafar argues that the ulama-versus-professional debate should cease to exist by now as the party has made constitutional amendments to spell out that even professionals can be defined as ulamas within the party context.
Kamarudin, a former university academician, said professionals can lead the party although they may not have religious credentials or had graduated from Islamic universities.
As long as they are Muslims who practised a pious religious life and are generally accepted as leaders by the party members, they can qualify to hold PAS leadership posts, Kamarudin said in an interview.
He reminded members that a former PAS acting president, the late Dr Allias Abbas who led from 1956 to 1959, was a medical doctor.
Therefore, professionals such as the likes of doctors, lawyers, economists or engineers have an equal standing to lead the party, similar to their ulama brothers, Kamarudin said.
He said the delegates should choose who has the best credentials to lead the party as it is their right to determine the future of PAS.
Maintain status quo
Penang PAS Youth chief Yusni Piah said some quarters are mostly leaning towards keeping a status quo in the party in view that the party must be prepared to face the next general election.
I think our muktamar would reinforce our stand with Pakatan Rakyat, namely strengthening the bond between PKR and DAP while also defending Anwar who is accused of another sex offence.
Anwar is embroiled in another controversy after a sex video was uploaded online, depicting someone who resembles him, having sex with an unidentified woman with Oriental features.
Yusni said that Penang PAS has no problems with president Abdul Hadi Awang, Nasharudin, Tuan Ibrahim and the other two vice-presidents, Sallehuddin Ayub and Mahfuz Omar.
Yusni also said that his area, Permatang Pauh, would also continue to nominate the youth wing head Nasharuddin Hassan Tantawi to continue for another term as the latter had just completed one-term.
He said that contrary to popular belief that PAS lost badly in the Sarawak state election, the party had actually garnered more votes and reduce the majority of their victors.
We are now in Sarawak. Even Umno is not there, so the future prospect of PAS ousting Umno as a political force is there.
He said the ulama leadership in PAS, must be upheld and protected, as it represents the essence of what the party is all about.







