Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Ah Pek challenges Mamak to come forward for a one-to-one sodomy sparring session

Dr M a spin doctor, says Kit Siang

Mahathir's attempt to distance himself from the ISA crackdown in 1987 raises the ire of a former detainee, who is demanding an apology from the 'mastermind'.

(Free Malaysia Today) - A long-time political foe has accused former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad, a medical doctor by training, of now specialising in the art of spinning untruths.

DAP veteran Lim Kit Siang took the 84-year-old statesman to task for blaming the police for the Operasi Lalang crackdown in 1987, one of the many black spots during Mahathir’s 22-year reign.

Lim, one of those hauled up under the Internal Security Act dragnet, was responding to Mahathir’s quotes in the book, “Doctor M: Operation Malaysia – Conversations with Mahathir Mohamad” by Tom Plate.

According to the book, Mahathir was furious with the police’s action.

“Well, I would have handled it differently, except that the police wanted to do these things because they say it is necessary…

“I actually met all of the opposition members (beforehand) and assured them that they would not be arrested. And you know what the police did? They arrested them. My credibility is gone,” he was quoted as saying.

However, Lim said that Mahathir was suffering from selective memory.

“Not only is he suffering from selective memory, he is spinning untruths about his misdeeds in his 22 years as prime minister,” he added.

Lim said that he never met Mahathir then nor did the latter give him an assurance that he would not be arrested during the Oct 27 clampdown.

“Although a day earlier I had spoken in Parliament in the 1988 budget debate warning of escalation of racial tensions and calling on all political parties ‘to agree to a one-year moratorium where no racial, language, cultural or religious issues will be created or raised for every Malaysian to concentrate on the national priority of achieving economic recovery and growth’,” he added.

The Ipoh Timor MP challenged Mahathir to name the opposition leaders he had met and assured.

“It is unworthy of Mahathir to ‘pass the buck’ to the police, as he not only defended the initial 106 arrests, he also exercised his powers as home minister to formally issue two-year ISA detention orders for 49 Malaysians, including seven DAP MPs,” he said.

Lim accused Mahathir of always making the false and baseless claim that DAP MPs were not arrested because they were MPs or for their political beliefs, but for “trying to stir racial unrest”.

“For instance, Mahathir told Asiaweek (Nov 11, 1988): ‘A few are still under detention because they refuse to give up stirring racial hatred. (Lim) was arrested not because he was leader of the opposition but because he was stirring racial tension in the country…They will be detained until they come around to thinking it is not the right thing to do…’,” he said.

Umno power-seekers to blame

According to Lim, the real culprits of the tensions were left completely free while none of those detained deserved to be behind bars.

“And not a single police officer interviewed me to secure my agreement to purportedly ‘give up stirring racial hatred’ before my release in April 1989,” he said.

“This applied to all the six DAP MPs detained – Karpal Singh, Lim Guan Eng, Dr Tan Seng Giaw, the late P Patto, the late V David and Lau Dak Kee – who were released without the so-called ‘come around to thinking it is not the right thing to do’, when they had done nothing wrong in the first place.

“In fact, the personal, petty and vindictive nature in the misuse of an already very oppressive ISA was further highlighted by the fact that Guan Eng and I were the last two of the 49 detainees to be released in April 1989 – when the various batches of releases started in June 1988,” he added.

Conceding that there were racial tensions at the time, Lim, however, blamed the power-seekers in Umno for it.

READ MORE HERE

The 'truth' behind PKR Sabah crisis


Leaked party report reveals high drama that preceded the defection of PKR Sabah's newly-minted chief to Umno.

A lot more appears to be behind the latest controversy surrounding PKR Sabah - that of the defection of its less-than-a-month-old chief Pajudin Nordin, 40, to Umno last Saturday.

A leaked internal party report, sent to selected media via email late yesterday by one Anthony Mark, details a vicious power struggle between two groups, with the newly-minted state leader smack in the middle.

The report - prepared by PKR vice-president Fuziah Salleh - reads like a political thriller, with one group staging a coup against the embattled Pajudin, who was in turn 'whisked away' and held against his will by the other group on the night of Jan 24.

Fuziah was in Kota Kinabalu that night to meet with Pajudin and the 25 state cabang (division) heads, at the party's Sabah headquarters, to decide on the new state leadership line-up.

NONEThe report says Pajudin was scheduled to meet with the state cabang leaders at 8pm that night to come up with the list, before Fuziah was to join them at 9.30pm to finalise it.

However, only four cabang leaders turned up, with 18 others who opposed Pajudin's appointment as PKR Sabah chief assembled at a hotel nearby.

The dissenters apparently stayed away from the meeting at the state party headquarters as they wanted to avoid a face-off with Batu Sapi cabang chief Hassnar Ebrahim, who they blamed for a "negative situation" arising at an earlier meeting with PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution.

Despite attempts to get the 18 to attend the meeting at the headquarters, they maintained their stance and instead urged Fuziah to meet with them where they were, to which she eventually relented.

Thuggery and 'house arrest'

According to the report, by the time Fuziah was ready to leave the PKR Sabah office to meet with this group about 11pm, she had also convinced Pajudin to ride with her in the car and meet them as well in an attempt to secure their backing for his leadership.

It was at this juncture that the situation became tense, with "people" believed to be associated with Hassnar - a known supporter of Tuaran cabang chief Ansari Abdullah - preventing Pajudin from entering the car with Fuziah.

NONEPajudin, who was also Ansari's deputy in Tuaran, then told Fuziah that he would go with the group, and "promised" to be present at her meeting with the other 18 cabang leaders shortly after. However, the report says, he never turned up.

Numerous attempts to contact Pajudin were futile, until at around 12.20am when he contacted Fuziah to tell her that he was calling from the toilet in a place where he was "heavily guarded" and prevented from leaving.

Seven minutes later, he sent her an SMS in Malay that read, "Kak G (Fuziah), I cannot count the tears (shed) in fighting for the party. I leave it to Kak G to find the best solution. For Allah I want to go there, but I am surrounded and guarded. May Allah save the situation and the party."

It is learnt that Pajudin had a change of heart after it was made known to him that the 18 cabang heads who opposed his appointment as PKR Sabah chief had voted en-bloc to support the formation of a state-level presidential council to replace him.

The report lists six cabang leaders as supporting Pajudin - those from Tuaran, Kota Marudu, Sipitang, Ranau, Kudat and Beluran. Batu Sapi's vote was "suspended".

The 18 against Pajudin are from Kota Belud, Sepanggar, Kota Kinabalu, Penampang, Putatan, Kimanis, Papar, Beaufort, Keningau, Pensiangan, Tenom, Libaran, Sandakan, Kinabatangan, Semporna, Kalabakan, Tawau and Silam.

Pajudin released his own state line-up, online around 2.45am on Jan 25, in direct defiance of a directive that such announcements be embargoed until they are approved by the national leadership.

He also called a press conference that afternoon to announce his line-up, just hours after a press conference by Fuziah, at which she announced the proposed presidential council, saying Pajudin had failed to gain majority support as state PKR chief.

Moving forward

Reached late last night, Fuziah, who sits in the powerful PKR political bureau, declined to comment on the leaked report, saying it should not have been released without authorisation and that she did not know the so-called Anthony Mark who leaked it.

NONEHowever, she said Pajudin's exit would not hamper PKR Sabah's efforts to get its act together with the guidance of the presidential council, which she said was a temporary measure to gauge the calibre of the cabang heads.

The council would be like a shadow cabinet, with each leader selected given charge of a portfolio matching the ministries in the state government.

Fuziah said the initial plan was to be "all inclusive", with the invitation extended to the six who voted for Pajudin, but they declined to sit in the council.

"We wanted to move forward with programmes, to get the cabang heads to come up with issues and policies. With a convention planned for the end of March (in Sabah), we want to help them set up a think tank to carry out research and also get them to hold regular press conferences.

"The 18 cabang heads are much disciplined and they really want to work. The 11 to 12 leaders (in the council) will be the potential leaders... hopefully, within the next few months, the real leaders will emerge," she said.

The PKR political bureau is later this evening expected to finalise the list of 11 to 12 cabang leaders who will sit on the Sabah PKR presidential council.

'Wrong - Pua's analysis of warship costs'

Najib: "We got them for free ... courtesy of Mamak who got lots of money ... $5 Trillions easily" ?

A writer for the respected ‘Jane’s Defence Weekly’ says DAP politician Tony Pua was comparing apples to oranges.


DAP's Petaling Jaya Utara parliamentarian Tony Pua was making unreasonable comparisons when he claimed that the Defence Ministry is going to pay up to 8.7 times more for the warships it is proposing of buying, said a defence analyst.

According to Dzirhan Mahadzir, correspondent for noted defence magazine Jane's Defence Weekly, this is because the specifications of the vessels mentioned by Pua vary.

“Some warships he compared are less in tonnage and size than the (vessels proposed for purchase)…so it is like comparing a Mini Cooper to a four-wheel drive in price,” he said in a lengthy commentary on his Facebook page.

It is also very difficult to make comparisons by dividing price by tonnage as even similar sized ships can come in very different specifications, he said.

“Even if (the ships) are similar in size, the type of equipment they mount such as weapons, electronics, engines ... and their design, along with construction material ... make substantial differences in price.”

Dzirhan, who is also published in academic journals and had lectured at the Royal Military College, said that the time the ships were ordered also plays a significant role in determining price.

For example, he pointed out, the contract for the Israel Saar V offshore patrol vessel (OPV) mentioned by Pua in his press statement yesterday was made in the early 1980s.

Nevertheless, the ship which cost US$260 million (RM791 million) is about RM200 million cheaper than the RM1 billion budgeted by the Defence Ministry for each OPV, and which has similar specifications.

Both have anti-air and anti-ship missiles, anti-submarine weapons and a helicopter hangar and helipad.

“Finally, a contract for a ship is not just for the ship but also for maintenance, support, training and delivery,” he said, noting that negotiations could bring down the cost of these aspects.

The analyst also said Pua's comparison to the US Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) is also wrong because the function is completely different to that of the OPV.

While the vessel was budgeted to be built at a price of US$300 million (RM913 million), the final cost was US$637 million (RM1.93 billion) and US$704 million (RM2.14 billion) for each of the two different designs purchased, he said.

'Common practice'


On Pua's contention that the Defence Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is announcing the budget of RM6 billion for six warships before the price has been finalised, Dzirhan said this is a common practice.

“The problem is Pua confuses a letter of intent…and OPV announcement as an actual contract. A potential value is announced by the government in a letter of intent for various reasons.

“However, it often is not the actual value when the contract occurs, particularly in regard to complex arms purchases.”

Previously, one of the most common complaints of defence companies was that Malaysian government often would not provide indications of how much a potential deal is worth, said Dzirhan.

“(This) made it hard for companies to justify their efforts to shareholders and investors and also obtain financial backing,” he added.

Teoh Inquiry: Commission ready for Monday hearing


KUALA LUMPUR: The Commission of Inquiry into the death of political aide Teoh Beng Hock held its last meeting today to discuss several issues before hearing proper begins on Monday.

The commission’s secretary Saripuddin Kasim said three main issues were discussed during the meeting which went on for about three hours at the Jalan Duta courts complex here this afternoon.

“Firstly we have gone through the administrative and logistive aspects of this inquiry, including visiting the courtroom (the biggest in the court) where we’ll be hold the inquiry,” he said.

Saripuddin said most matters will be formally addressed on Monday, including the application by Teoh’s family lawyer Karpal Singh and Malik Imtiaz Sarwar for the Selangor government to be able to represent during the hearing.

The lawyers have previously written letters to the inquiry secretariat seeking permission to be allowed to act for the family and the state government respectively and have the right to cross-examine witnesses.

“We were also briefed by the conducting officers on the progress of the preparations so far and we are satisfied with all of that,” added Saripuddin.

“We know this case is of public concern and we will do our best,” he said, adding that the hearing will be held at the 3rd floor of the court complex at 9am on Monday.

Earlier, the commission members also met up with Teoh’s sister Lee Lan and her lawyers Karpal and Gobind Singh Deo.

During the informal meeting which lasted about 15 minutes, concerns were raised over the court revision of Teoh’s inquest verdict that is pending.

Karpal said that there should not be a revision and an inquiry on the same matter concurrently.

“We can’t go on with both. There will be conflict in the findings later on. It must have one only, we cannot have one concurrently,” he said.

Other major issues brought up at the informal meeting included the dates of the inquiry hearing and the list of witnesses.

MORE TO FOLLOW

‘Dying politician using sick man to ail M’sia’


KUALA LUMPUR: Perkasa chief Ibrahim Ali believes that a local “dying politician” is using a “sick” American to speak ill of Malaysia.

Although he did not reveal the identity of the politician, it was an obvious reference to Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim, whom many of his critics feel is running out of political breath.

At a press conference here this afternoon, the Perkasa boss, who has a penchant for psychoanalysing his critics, referred former US ambassador to Malaysia John Mallot for psychiatric treatment.

The vocal politician also believes that National Economic Advisory Council (NEAC) member Zainal Aznam Mohd Yusof was in need of similar professional help.

The two had claimed that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak was pandering to Perkasa’s demands.

Diagnosing Mallot as a “sick man”, Ibrahim dismissed the former envoy’s accusation that Najib tolerated racial provocation.

“As prime minister, he has to accommodate all races. He is the leader for all Malaysians. His policies reflect his concerns for everyone,” he said.

In a recent commentary penned for the Asian Wall Street Journal (AWSJ), Mallot had accused Najib of “tolerating, and in some cases provoking ethnic factionalism through words and actions”.

Ibrahim also shielded Defence Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, who Mallot had criticised for questioning the patriotism of non-Malays.

The Perkasa boss said the minister was misquoted by the media and he had rectified his statement.

Zainal is ‘Mallot junior’

Training his guns on Zainal later, Ibrahim had accused the economic adviser of forgetting his roots and called him, ‘Mallot’s junior’.

“He claims Perkasa hijacked the New Economic Model (NEM). By saying that, he is actually belittling Najib and the Cabinet,” he said.

At a forum yesterday, Zainal alleged that the government was caving in to Perkasa and other right-wing groups by removing the Equal Rights Commission (EOC) from NEM.

He also claimed that Perkasa had threatened to burn Part One of the NEM document as it contained a proposal to drop the 30% bumiputra equity ownership.

Denying the allegation, Ibrahim said Perkasa had merely deliberated on the document together with other concerned parties.

“Najib had said that he welcomed feedback from all quarters over NEM. That is why even the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry also put forward their proposals.

“As for Perkasa, our 40-member strong committee, consisting of politicians, economists, lawyers and other professionals deliberated on the NEM before submitting our proposals. Just because he (Najib) looked into our proposal as well, that doesn’t mean he was listening to us only,” said the independent Pasir Mas MP.

Reiterating Perkasa’s stand, Ibrahim stressed that the Malays still required affirmative action as many were lagging behind in economic development and education opportunities.

“The Malays have been marginalised for about 500 years, since the colonial powers came to our shores. Do you expect the Malays to be ready within a short span of 30 years?” he asked.

He added that it was easy for professionals like Zainal, with mere paper qualification to speak about being competitive but experience was always a better teacher.

“People can talk. Even Anwar can talk like he knows everything about the economy but I know how things run in a business,”said Ibrahim, adding that he was businessman for three decades.

Zaid the new ‘frog king’

Meanwhile, Ibrahim also hailed People’s Welfare Party (Kita) president Zaid Ibrahim, a fellow Kelantanese, as the new “frog king” in Malaysian politics.

“When he left Umno, everyone hailed him as a hero. When he joined PKR, everyone praised him. Then he had a feud with Azmin Ali (PKR deputy president), he jumped to Kita,” he said.

However, the Perkasa boss, who was also often referred to as a “frog” due to his party hopping past, defended such actions, but stressed that a clean record was important.

“Look at me, I don’t even have a police report filed against me,” he said.

Also read:

Mirror, mirror, is Najib fairest of ‘em all?

No reason to keep temple closed


PETALING JAYA: The Human Rights Party today sent a legal notice to the Selangor government seeking clarification on steps taken to reopen the Bukit Gasing Sivan Temple in Petaling Jaya.

Its pro-tem secretary-general, P Uthaya Kumar, wants the state government to disclose the reasons for the stop-work order on the temple in 2008 and other details under the Freedom of Information Act 2010 (Selangor).

“We act for the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) and the scores of devotees of the Bukit Gasing Sivan temple in Petaling Jaya.

“According to a recent news report in Tamil daily Makkal Osai, the state government announced that the temple will remain closed, contradicting a state assemblyman’s earlier statement,” said Uthaya in the letter.

Kota Alam Shah assemblyman M Manoharan had said on Monday that the hilltop temple will be re-opened to the public after the deities have been moved to a new shelter built just beside the main building. The temple was ordered to be closed by the state government for safery reasons

Uthaya said the state government has no legal basis to keep the temple closed as it was in contravention of Article 11 of the Federal Constitution.

He also questioned if there was a bona-fide concern over safety and why there were mansions on the way down from the temple propped up by 100-feet safety beams visibly protruding on the sides.

He pointed out that based on safety reasons, then scores of other hill slope houses and condominiums in other areas in Selangor with such reinforcements should been closed down.

He also said that there have been no cases of other places of worship ever being closed or issued a stop-work order by the state government.

“I cannot understand how the new temple (in the new shelter) can be dangerous to the public. Are there devotees in the thousands going up and down the temple daily to justify saying that the place is not safe?” asked Uthaya.

“Is this an attempt by the Selangor government to close down this temple in collusion with the nearby millionaires who reside in their mansions along Bukit Gasing?”

Popular place of worship

The lawyer-turned-politician also said that he was suspicious of the Petaling Jaya City Council’s (MBPJ) delay in getting the safety works, which started in 2008, completed.

The Bukit Gasing Sivan temple has been a popular place of worship in the Klang Valley and the temple management even provided shuttle service for devotees during festival time.

“The erosion near the Sivan temple is small and I suspect the state government has a hidden agenda by deliberately raising safety issue to stall the opening of the temple,” he added.

“If the state is sincere on the temple issue, then Mentari Besar Khalid Ibrahim should get the matter sorted out immediately and grant the land title and at the same time gazette the Sivan temple as a permanent place of worship.”

Uthaya said HRP will give the state government 30 days to come with a permanent solution to the temple issue.

‘Najib has nullified NEM’


KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s launching of a new unit to strengthen Bumiputera economic participation has nullified his own New Economic Model (NEM), said DAP publicity chief Tony Pua today.

He said that the introduction of Unit Peneraju Agenda Bumiputera (Teraju) is against the NEM’s supposed spirit to induce merit-based affirmative action programmes that will benefit the bottom 40% of all income earners instead of just the Bumiputera race.

“Najib is now proving to be a failed reformer,” Pua, the Petaling Jaya Utara MP, said in a statement today.

“His much vaunted ‘Najibnomics’ is turning out to be nothing more than an endorsement of the controversial NEP, which favours the influential elite, and a copycat of Mahathir’s mega-projects and privatisation policies of the 1990s,” he added.

He said it is most unfortunate that Najib has chosen to pander to vested political interests of race-based extremists groups such as Perkasa.

When launching Teraju yesterday, Najib said that the unit will lead, co-ordinate and drive Bumiputera economic participation via new and existing initiatives, and propose institutional reforms to increase effectiveness.

It will also act as the secretariat for the Bumiputera Agenda Supreme Council (MTAB) that oversees Bumiputera economic development.

Najib criticised heavily

While acknowledging that liberalisation is key to repair the economy, Najib had promised in the past that any reforms will not abandon the needs and interests of the Bumiputera community.

Things were looking bright for investors when Najib did away with regulations requiring a 30% Bumiputera stake in 27 service and financial sub-sectors while limiting the power of the Foreign Investment Committee that oversees Bumiputera equity.

Bumiputeras account for 73% of the 2.4 million households in the lowest 40% income bracket, according to Najib.

But Pua said Najib had darkened the bright prospects of the NEM by introducing Teraju while extending the race-based New Economic Policy (NEP) without any clear timeline.

He also pointed out that Najib’s reform plans were heavily criticised by a member of the National Economic Action Council (NEAC), Zainal Aznam Mohd Yusof, and a former US ambassador to Malaysia, John Malott.

Zainal Aznam said yesterday that the Najib government has little political will to push through real reform.

Malott has warned against delaying reform plans, saying it would risk dampening the country’s competitiveness.

The 30% Bumiputera stake in the national economy – a policy which analysts said has damaged Malaysia’s economic attractiveness – has been the NEP’s target since its implementation in 1970.

Thirty-four years later, official statistics state that Bumiputera-held equity in the country stood at 18.7% or close to 11% below the target.

No Tunisia/Egypt-style protest here, on condition...

What happened in Tunisia and Egypt could well occur in Malaysia if the warning given by the Prime Minister is taken seriously. If it cannot happen, why then the warning?

People do not take to the streets for no apparent reason, more so if over a million take part in the demonstrations. When people cannot tolerate the suffering any longer, they do not need to be instigated to go against the government.

The warning given by the Prime Minister is totally uncalled for, unless it is because he feels insecure, he is not leading the country on the right path, or he is unable to contain the vast corruption nor is he able to abide by the rule of law.

Malaysians will not overthrow a corrupt and incompetent ruling government through street demonstration but through the ballot box. But here the Prime Minister must assure the rakyat that the General Election will be carried out fairly and on a level playing field. The PM must also retract his statement not long ago that UMNO would be willing to go through 'crushed bodies and lost lives' to defend Putrajaya.

Unless the PM is running the country the way other dictators are running theirs, there should be no worries about Malaysians taking to the streets to usurp his power.

The PM should stop talking about his 1Malaysia and provide ample opportunities for every citizen. He must stop the rhetoric of racism, corruption, NEP, 'Ketuanan Melayu', as well as ISA, PPPA, OSA, partisan roles of the EC, MACC, the Police, and questionable judicial decisions.

My advice to the PM is this: start the walk and put into action all your talk of the past two years. You need not fear losing power if you do the right thing. But holding on to power using undemocratic means will surely see the fate of this country following the fate of Tunisia and Egypt.


Ops.Lalang arrest,it wasnt me says Mahathir,it was the police....

Dr Mahathir Mohamad had pointed at the direction of the police over Ops Lalang, which saw 106 people arrested including top political dissidents under the Internal Security Act in 1987. In the most recent book on Mahathir, 'Doctor M: Operation Malaysia - Conversations with Mahathir Mohamad', the former premier of 22 years revealed that he was furious over the mass crackdown.

"Well, I would have handled it differently, except that the police wanted to do these things because they say it is necessary...

"I actually met all of the opposition members (beforehand) and assured them that they would not be arrested. And you know what the police did? They arrested them. My credibility is gone," he said.

"You must have been furious!" retorted Tom Plate, the interviewer and author of the book.

"Yeah, but what can I do? You see, I have to accept that they are the people on the ground that makes a decision. I give general authority to them," continued Mahathir, who was known as a strongman who brook little dissent.

Regrets, I've had few

In the 1987 crackdown on Oct 27, over one hundred people - mostly opposition and a handful of MCA and Umno politicians - were arrested while the publishing permits for The Star and Sin Chew Jit Poh and Watan were revoked. The government had explained that the second largest ISA swoop since the May 13 racial riots were 'necessary' to contain rising 'racial tensions' from the protests over the appointment of non-Chinese educated principals to Chinese vernacular schools.

In response, Umno held a counter protest, where notably then Youth chief Najib Abdul Razak led a mammoth rally in Kampung Baru days prior to the ar! rests. M ahathir, who was the PM at that time, also said that in retrospect, he may have had some regrets over the clampdown.

"Yeah. Regrets ... I mean you have to trust the police, because you have to work with them. They are the people who have to look after security, and when they advise you that the tension is very high, that it might explode into racial riots, and they need to take this action, you can't tell them no.

"You don't, you see, because you know less than they do. See, and you have to trust the people who are the implementers. I have no means of verifying everything that they say," he said.

You don't argue with men with guns

Later on in the book, Mahathir betrays a hint of timidity with the police force. When Plate asked whether Mahathir's control over the police, even as a powerful prime minister, was not absolute, the elder statesman agreed.

"No, not absolute. You have to learn to live with the people with guns," he said. "But then, does that make you to some extent a hostage of the people who have guns?" asked Plate.

"To a certain extent... everybody is. You see, you have to give people the means to enforce, and then of course they are better equipped than you are. You have to accept the fact that when they tell you that certain things need to be done, you have to respect them.

"If you keep running them down - there have been instances where they were run down by the government as being incompetent, corrupt and all that - what happens then?" he asked, hinting that the police may in the end go on strike.

source:malaysiakini

'Namakan siapa pemimpin pembangkang itu - Lim Kit Siang' baca di sini.

cheers.

Struggle For a Just Society is Continuous And Self-Sacrificial #LoyarBerkasih

9 February, 2011 By Jahaberdeen Mohamed Yunoos

Get Free or Die Tryin? | Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bohmanLove, patience, perseverance, and non-violence will win battles of the heart for true reforms for a just society. All through human history, all fundamental changes are brought about by people themselves, never by any politician. This is precisely why I keep reminding everyone on my blog that politicians are irrelevant unless they evolve into Raperas.There have always been persons, though few, who have been pointing out the oppression and injustices that are taking place in society. However, people seem to "wake up" only when the oppression becomes widespread and to the point of recurrent humiliation. It is only then when people begin to stand up with courage.However, at every single moment in our life, there are selfless brave rare persons who are fighting against the unjust system in their own way. We just do not know them because they do not really have a need to be known. However, we unknowingly reap the benefits of their struggle. I believe the last thing such persons want is to be a hero or seek recognition.While the young have energy and a few among them have the sincere intention to improve things, the desire and struggle for a "just society" is free of age factors. There are old and young scums who cannot see further than their noses. I know many idealistic young ones who only grow older to become the worst capitalists and selfish animals.Trust me on this. One of the greatest challenges in life is to hold on to your ideals as you grow older because almost everyone and everything around you will try to make you "matured and practical", that is, to give up your ideals. The biography of Mohandas Karamchand Ghandi or Mahatma Ghandi as he came to be known had a tremendous impact on my life. The "exper! iments&q uot; (as he called it) that he conducted with his life was truly an inspiring example of a man who stuck to his ideals to his death.

Mahatma Gandhi | Credit: http://www.dinodia.comGhandi was after all a lawyer who had made a big name in South Africa and was given a heros welcome on his return to India by the then largest party, the Congress. Had he been ambitious, the most pragmatic thing for him to do was to enter mainstream politics though the Congress Party. He would probably have "the party machinery, the funds, the pomp and the power" of politicians.However, he did the "foolish" thing of turning it down and deciding to "get to know India" where he adorned his famous half naked clothes dhoti and went around the country mixing with the masses. His entire life was one of selfless sacrifice for the purpose of achieving independence for India both politically, socially and economically. In the process, he spoke, wrote and urged the Indians to transcend their ethnicity and to accept each other as Gods children. As history recorded, at the end, he was murdered by one of his "own".

Gandhi Love Peace | Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/achievealignNevertheless, Ghandi left behind a legacy for humankind; that we can with love, patience, perseverance, and non-violence win battles of the heart. It is in the hearts of humankind that battles should be fought so that true reforms for a just society may come forth.Struggle for a just society is forever continuous and it goes beyond our deaths. Anyone who is keen to be part of this struggle must be prepared to sacrifice and be ready to receive ingratitude from the very recipients of his struggle. There is no glory in such a task, only the process of living as an honourable human being answerable to your conscience.A! ll the b est to those who want to make this world a bit better than we found it. If we do not make it worse, we have succeeded.Dato Jahaberdeen Mohd Yunoos is a senior lawyer practicing at Messrs Jahaberdeen & Co., exco member of JUST International, blogs at http://jahaberdeen.blogspot.com and http://jahamy.blogspot.com. He has authored two much sought after books titled "Islam: Antara Isi dan Kulit" and "Urgently wanted!: Rapera". Goes around the country with SABM delivering talks on equality from the perspective of the Constitution and the Quran. Deep interest in comparative religion and a host of other things.

  • Share/Save

Tags: #loyarberkasih, challenge, hero, ideals, Injustice, Jahaberdeen Mohd Yunoos, just society, Mahatma Ghadi, rapera, unjust system

This entry was posted on 9 February, 2011 at 11:30 am and is filed under Express Yourself. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.


Divide and misrule Is Najib feeling insecure or is there a real chance for an Egypt blow-up here?









What happened in Tunisia and Egypt could well occur in Malaysia if the warning given by the PrimeMinisteris taken seriously. If it cannot happen, why then the warning?
People do not take to the streets for no apparent reason, more so if over a million take part in the demonstrations. When people cannot tolerate the suffering any longer, they do not need to be instigated to go against the government.

The warning given by the PrimeMinisteris totally uncalled for, unless it is because he feels insecure, he is not leading the country on the right path, or he is unable to contain the vast corruption nor is he able to abide by the rule of law.

Malaysians will not overthrow a corrupt and incompetent ruling government through street demonstration but through the ballot box. But here the Prime Minister must assure the rakyat that the General Election will be carried out fairly and on a level playing field. The PM must also retract his statement that umno is willing for '... crushed bodies and lost lives' to take place in order to defend Putrajaya.

Unless the PM is running the country the way other dictators are running theirs, there should be no worries about Malaysians taking to the streets to usurp his power.

The PM should stop talking about his 1Malaysia, one big family, our family spirit, fair and just policy to provide ample opportunities for every citizen and the country's wealth to! be equi tably distributed rhetoric when racism, corruption, NEP, ketuanan melayu, ISA, PPPA, OSA, partisan duties of the EC, MACC, PDRM, questionable Judicial decisions are all still solidly entrenched in the ruling government's policies.
My advice to the PM is this: start the walk and put into action all your talk of the past two years.You need not fear losing power if you do the right thing.
But holding on to power using undemocratic means will surely see the fate of this country following the fate of Tunisia and Egypt.

Can Malaysia ever go the way of Egypt, or of Tunisia, where entrenched regimes have been deposed or look as though they soon will be? And the answer of course is 'No'. For one thing, unlike Egypt, and other parts of the Arab world which are witnessing a groundswell of turmoil, Malaysia's Guided democracy where governments are routinely voted out of office by the electorate. When you can kick an unpopular government out in the next election, what need of a revolution?
However - what with endless scams and rampant corruption having become the disorder of the day - many are beginning to question whether Malaysia is in fact a democracy or a kleptocracy, a government of thieves, disguised as a democracy. Changes of government don't help when all governments, past and present, of whatever professed ideological hue or stripe they be, are seen to be equally corrupt and unable, or unwilling, to provide efficient and effective governance.
Wouldn't such a situation merit apoliticaland social earthquake as Egypt is currently witnessing? No, in Malaysia it wouldn't. And it doesn't. Because malaysa is different from Egypt not only in that we are supposed to be a democracy but, more importantly, because as a polity we are far more internally divided than is Egypt, or almost any other country you care to name. In Egypt, Muslim and ! Christia n, men and women, the educated middle class and illiterate labourers have banded together with the single-point agenda of toppling Hosni Mubarak. In its diversity, Malaysia can never have such focused unity.
Malaysia's much-vaunted ethnic, religious, social andpoliticaldiversity is both a boon and a bane. Our pluralism has saved us - barring aberrations such as MAHATHIR's Emergency Lalang- from the clutches of free press: we are just too many and too different from each other to be susceptible to overt dictatorial regimentation. However, by the same token we are also susceptible to the covert dictatorship of a cynical and exploitative political class which has made a mockery of democracy.
Despite its surface differences, Malaysia's entrenched political class is a model of underlying unity: it is united in perpetuating its power at any cost. The people of Malaysia, on the other hand, you and me, are divided along economic, social, religious, linguistic, regional and many other faultlines too numerous to count. These differences have over the years been emphasised and exploited by the political class which has created its own captive vote banks based on caste, creed, language, regional identity, economic status and other real or imagined divisions that separate us from each other. The British taught our political class that the secret of gaining and holding on to power lay in the policy of divide and rule. After Independence, our UMNOPUTRAS
have bettered the instruction of our colonial masters. Escalating regional chauvinism flexes its muscles
In Egypt, it is Hosni Mubarak and representatives of his repressive regime, who are seen to be the enemy. In scam-ridden, criminally misgoverned India, our divided polity is too programmed to be paranoid about the supposed enemy within - the neighbour who belongs to a different caste, or re! ligion, or speaks a different language - to identify a common foe in our corrupt netas and babus.
Egypt can revolt. Thanks to our politically-inspired divisiveness, it seems that MALAYSIA is destined to remain merely revolting.

The defense secret business

  • The intended purchases of RM1 bill per boat by the Malaysian Government have sent a shocked and awe messages across the country. Once again as matter of record in the best interest of country defense, the deal is surrounded with secrecy. Certainly without details forthcoming we would not really know whether they are buying a fishing boat laden with nuclear missiles or otherwise. Therefore any comparison with other international naval boat purchases is not appropriate.

  • The modernization of weaponry of the MAF took place rapidly when Najib was the Defence Minister and this continues when he became the DPM and finally the PM. Certainly the top guns of this country defense personnel are happy as they get to play with new toys. Based on my experience while in the service, that is how the top guns reacted when they get new toys. When the MIGs and SUs came on board of Malaysian Air Force fleet, scores of top generals find good reasons to go for a joy ride. It is fun to see how adults behave like children getting new toys.

  • One of the major sore points about the BN government is that the way they handle big business behind closed doors. This is one of the major reasons why the educated masses dont trust the government. Despite such a glaring fault lines, they continue their ways without sense of guilt or the need to be accountable. We have seen good amount of money is being spent illegally within the boundaries of the law at the expense of the people.

  • How much more commissions and profit sharing elements or fronting schemes must BN do? Do they want stripped this nation dry before they stopped? In Selangor we see an UMNO man gets RM 5 mill salary per year in the water business. I doubt he gets to keep the entire RM5 mill less taxes.

  • Similarly with purchases of the 18 SUs this was managed by a consulting company owned by the former! CM of M elaka. They are many more that goes with ships, submarines, planes, helos and the respective spare parts. The same scheme goes into construction of hospitals, highways and palaces.

  • Does the government expect the people sit still and watch from the side with awe forever?

  • Moving On #LoyarBerkasih

    9 February, 2011 By Aston Paiva

    In The Tunnel | Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jstanphotoOn Jan 28, 2011, an e-mail circular on a UK students session with the Selangor Menteri Besar, sparked a very spirited discussionon the LoyarBurok e-group. Below is Aston Paivas response to the series of e-mails on our skewed conception of Freedom, Independence and Justice. I never blame the politicians. I only blame the public. It would be unreasonable to blame the politicians. They are people just like everyone else; they get their values, their ideas, their perspectives, their vision, their dreams and their desires from the people around them. Our leaders are ultimately a reflection of what the Malaysian public truly stands for and is willing to put up with.Lets contemplate this: Can you really spot any difference between the 3 Perak party hoppers and the rest of the Sultans during the colonial period? There are none. All were driven by the lull of security, self interest and had no qualms whatsoever living in dishonour.Let us never forget, this wasnt a country that was formed through the blood of martyrs or people in the veins of Patrick Henry or Mahatma Gandhi; people who believed in liberty and who understood what it meant and how precious it is. This country was formed by a bunch of royals who received payment in exchange for land; trading the liberty of their "subjects" for mere handouts by colonialists, cowering before their colonial masters instead of standing valiantly, bartering freedom for security.This country is not a product of valour and labour, it is a product of convenience and cowardice. In that respect, I am not proud of Malaysia.However, that is not the end of things. Id like to see this nation rebuilt. Peoples values need transvaluation. Our current conception of Freedom, Independence and most importantly Justi! ce is sk ewed and it needs to be realigned.

    Malaysians Took to The Streets 2007 | Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/syedazidi/Our Non Muslim, Non Malay and East Malaysian population in particular need to be treated with dignity and emboldened to feel that they have a place in this country, that they are of value irrespective of what utility they can provide to others, that they are not squatters in a place they can never call home.The Malay Muslim community on the other hand need to be empowered to tell their religious leaders to take their nonsense and shove it.We have a lot of work to do. Complaining can be a good thing, it lets you get your thoughts out and most times a person is at his most honest self when he is most angry. Others can take note, learn to reassess themselves and see where they have faltered and if they should change themselves or their ways.The fundamental liberties enshrined in Part II of the Constitution is superior in nature and I think we should be dissuaded from meaningless arguments on the evils of democracy. I have only too often noticed that people who make anti democratic stands either have an infantile understanding of political history or have simply discounted Constitutionalism, Rule of Law and Separation of Powers from their argument all together.Democracy while meaning majority rule doesnt mean that the fundamental liberties (inherent to all, minority or majority) can be subjected to vote. In that respect, there can never be an argument of the majority putting the minority into a subordinate position.I can think of no other system of political governance that has worked the best. For now, this is the most workable model. Until the citizenry becomes more mature and is capable of greater self regulation, then this is what we must live with. To have governance is in itself a plague on humanity but as Churchill wisely commented, "Democracy is the ! best of the worst."

    Kuala Terengganu By-Election Fever | Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/shutterhack/ So, to bring things back now. The next general elections. Are we to make our politicians more accountable? Perhaps. But I think the more important task is to make the citizenry more accountable to themselves. To make them feel that there is more than just political parties and big names, that there are issues, problems, disputes, conflicts and blatant transgressions of fundamental liberties and human rights. And that there are stories and personal lives behind these stories:

    • How a man like Zaina Abdin and his family, the Ahmadiyah community and the family of Mohan Singh are being deprieved of their right to religious freedom by the Selangor State Government.
    • How a group of innocent transsexuals are being targeted and persecuted by the machinery of the Negeri Sembilan State Government.
    • How books by writers and publishers like Kim Quek and Sisters in Islam are being indiscriminately censored by the Federal Government in order to suppress legitimate criticisms.
    • How a man like Khaeryll Benjamin Ibrahim can be taken away from his family and subjected to detention, for up to two years, without trial under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Special Preventive Measures) 1985.
    • How do we ensure that the police and other government departments do not abuse their powers resulting in more Kugans, Aminul Rashids, Altantuyas and Teoh Beng Hocks.
    This is going to be our task for the months, years and decades to come. We can write in LoyarBurok, engage in advocacy, institute Court cases, organise forums and debates, have peaceful assemblies, write to the press and international media, get involved in the LoyarBurok Rakyat centre etc. Whatever you do, the key target here remains to be the Malaysian public. If you enlighten them and do it from now, yo! u can ce rtainly see a brighter future and a series of better leaders coming our way.Aston Paiva recommends the movie Into the Wild by Sean Penn. Go watch it right now!
    • Share/Save

    Tags: #loyarberkasih, Aston Paiva, Democracy, freedom, justice, Liberty, politicians, Politics

    This entry was posted on 9 February, 2011 at 6:00 am and is filed under Express Yourself. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

    One Response to Moving On #LoyarBerkasih

  • Ruzaini Zul on 9 February, 2011 at 8:26 am
    Well articulated Aston. The time is apt for us to take concrete action to end the prejudice and fear bred by our own brothers and sisters in the society.Whoever we are, we need to tell our suspicious brethren that we are not here to wipe them from this earth. We are here to live and live harmoniously with them. We are here to build the nation together for the betterment of the country.

  • TAIBS ANG POW MILLIONS IN CASH!

    . Sarawak Report

    This years lucky hosts? Taib lands with his new wife on the prominent Lau family in Sibu this weekend. The top Taib business cronies are the owners of the logging giant KTS. How much Ang Pow was paid this time to stay in favour?

    As the Chinese New Year celebrations get into their stride,inside sources have revealedhowAbdul Taib Mahmud habitually exploitsthis annualopportunityto furthersqueeze his Chinese businesses cronies.

    We have received extraordinary accountsof how the Chief Minister toursthe big housesof Miri and Sibu each year, usually accompanied byfamily and grandchildren, in order to accept huge cheques and bags of cash from his dismayed hosts.

    Cash for concessions

    Taibs favoured partners from the Chinese community know they must continuouslypay out inkickbacks and shareholdingsif they want toreceive favours and concessions at the expense of the state and the ordinary people.

    According to top businessmen who have confided directly to Sarawak Report,an upfront cut for Taib himself must first be negotiated and paid into his bank accounts abroad. Next, the deal will also involve shares and positions for family members inthe company which has gained the concession to cut wood or plant oil palm.In the case of timber, Taib also demands a further cut of 100 ringgit per ton,which adds up to billions of ringgit every year. After that there are the shipping scams, where chosen exporters again have to pay enormous kickbacks.

    However, the towkays find the perversion of their Chi! nese tra dition of Ang Powa particularly unpleasant and greedy form of exploitation.

    Red envelopes

    New Year of course is the time when Chinese like to treat their children and friends with presents and little red evelopes with cash. A visit to a friendduring this periodwill hold the expectation that such a treat might be forthcoming at such a time. A generous gift would normally be a maximum of 50 ringgit. But Taib has made clear he expects bigger and better when he is thevisitor involved!

    The Chief Minister will turn up, some years with the families of his daughter Jamilah and son Sulaiman and the children will be handed cheques of RM 100,000. They are alwaysreadily accepted!

    Oneprominent businessmanhas confided how the Taibsaccept these gifts as their right andthe Chinese hosts know they mustmake the gesture if they want to remain in Taibs favour. Sarawak Report has learntthat this practise is regarded as particularlyoffensive by the businessmen concerned, because it is an invasion of their homes and hospitality, but they have no choice.

    Another angry business leader told us this is just another way of making the Chinese bend low before the Bumis, to show who is boss. It is so greedy and disgusting.

    Bomoh is bag carrier Nothing less than a million please!

    We have also learnt from other sources that Taibs once-favoured Bomoh, AhmadSuut, has also performed a role in conducting the Chief Ministers business on these occasions. The source tells us that the method is for Taibs secretary to ring the Towkayabout a dayin advance to ask how much Ang Pow will be provided if Taib were to favour them with a visit during his New ! Year pro gress.

    The victim is left in no doubt, according to our insider, that nothing less than a million ringgit would be considered acceptable!

    He is not just coming for the cakes our sourceexplains.

    After the call the Chinese businessman is left having to make arrangements to draw the agreed sum of money in cash. The notes are then stuffed into a bag ready for the arrival of the Chief Minister. Our source, who is closely connected to one of Sarawaks wealthiest families tells us:

    Taib comes and makes his visit and honours the homeand then he departs leaving the Bomoh and a bodyguard behind. Once the Chief Minister has departedthe host hands themthe bag of cash and they take it on to the Chief Minister!

    Clearly such obnoxious behaviour is entirely unecessary on the part of the Chief Minister, who is already a multi-billionaire. However, onlookers assume that his greed and opportunism drives him to take advantage of every occasion from which he can make profit.

    It is considered that this inabilitiy to say enough is enough and his refusal to give up trying to suck each and every last penny from the people of Sarawak and their resources may well prove his final undoing.

    Election pencilled in for mid-March

    All the signs are that Taib has laid plans to call his election later this month to be held in mid-March. His agenda! for the future of Sarawak, should he win, has now been clearly identified. First he plans to double the area of oil palm in Sarawak from one million hectares to two million hectares and second he plans to displace a further 600,000 native people as part of his project to build 12 more dams like the disastrous Bakun project.

    This rapaciousness may very well at last turn the patience of the long-obedient longhouse folk against him.The opposition PR coalition led byNative Land Rights lawyer, Baru Bian, have made plain they will prevent these disasters if they take power and they will give back the stolen land to the native peoples. They will also chase Taibs stolen money to pay for water, electricity and roads for the people. Now the voters have a real choice and Taibsconfidence that he can always strike fear into the people and secure their vote may this time prove unfounded.

    Meanwhile, towkays who see the Chief Ministers number appearing on their phone screensover the coming week would do wellto remain unavailable during New Year,otherwise their bank notes will surely be adding to the Taibs 2011Ang Pow treasure trove!


    Filed under: corruption, Politics Tagged: Anak Sarawak Bangsa Malaysia, Human rights, Sarawak politics, Save Sarawak, Taib Mahmud

    Isa Samad's appointment a big mistake for the market....

    The appointment of former Negri Sembilan menteri besar Mohd Isa Abdul Samad as Felda chairperson has been unsettling news for the market, says Maybank Investment chief executive officer Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz.

    There have been many GLCs that have ex-politicians appointed as chairpersons, but Felda is a rare case, where the market is concerned with such an appointment. It sends the wrong signals, he said. Speaking at a forum in Kuala Lumpur today, Tengku Zafrul said a shrinking talent pool could be the reason why top posts in government-linked companies were required to be filled by a bumiputera.

    While he was quite diplomatic in outlining reasons for the concern, fellow panelist and National Economic Advisory Council member Zainal Aznam Mohd Yusof put it very direct, saying Mohd Isa's track record of graft had raised alarm bells. The Umno disciplinary board in 2005 found Mohd Isa guilty of money politics during the party's elections. It was a sad day when Isa was appointed chairperson of Felda, said the economist, who played a major role in the preparation of the Second, Fourth and Fifth Malaysia Plans.

    Zainal Aznam said real reform could be achieved if there was a blanket ban on the appointment of politicians to head GLCs. Why not say politicians cannot be appointed, no matter which political divide you are from, or whether or not you are corrupt? Power corrupts, so the basic assumption is that (politicians) are stigmatised as corrupt, he said, adding that the appointment was a blow to Felda's solid reputation in the developing world.

    'Nation's founding fathers turning in their graves'

    Earlier, in his officiating address, former Tourism, Arts and Culture Min! ister Ab dul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir lamented the state of the nation, particularly the rife corruption and cronyism. If the founding fathers could see what is happening now, they will turn in their graves. Corruption is everywhere, you have to bribe people to get things done. Cronyism is everywhere. There are beautiful statements (made), but they do not reflect the real state of affairs, Abdul Kadir said.

    source:malaysiakini

    One fine morning, Isa Samad called Najib and said,"Hey, Najib,I knew what you did in Port Dickson, so now 'lu tolong gua,gua tolong lu". It's history.

    Now,Tengku Zafrul's tenure as Maybank's Investment Chief is now numbered.....

    cheers.

    Old Man Taib is at it again.

    BARKING MAD

    In an unusually fatuous speech about the Chinese community CM Taib disclosed more than he had, perhaps, intended to. Saying, arrogantly, that he could speak no Chinese he claimed to be multi-racial and went on to say he had to think for the Chinese! Dont worry about it, Taib. Not only can the Chinese think for themselves; they have; and their future does not include you!

    He did not leave matters there but went on to add that urban areas lost to BN in the election might not get anything. This crude threat of discrimination was described by him as the rule of the game. Nothing he could have said better describes his contempt for democracy and his blatant use of public funds, provided by Chinese and other taxpayers, to benefit himself and his cronies. Maybe he has finally decided that threats are cheaper than the bribery with which BN have won elections in the past.

    Demonstrating that he has lost his grip on reality he described urban voters, by which he meant Chinese, as wanting to elect someone to bark at the government. In reality those elected will not bark but bite and Taib will be the victim! Even more foolishly he went on to claim that BN would be re-elected probably with a two thirds majority Dream on Taib! There will probably be such a majority but it will belong to Pakatan!

    This speech was more important and interesting for what it did not say rather than for what it did. It made clear that Taib and BN have written off the Chinese vote. It is an admission that SUPP is a busted flush that will probably not win a single seat and it is, more significantly, an admission that BN can no longer claim to represent the Sarawak community as a whole.

    As to the native electors there cam! e not a word from their CM! He cannot be so stupid, and vain, as to believe that the people who he has allegedly robbed of their lands love him and intend to vote for him! The fact that he made no appeal for their support when admitting that he had lost that of the Chinese community shows that he is not sure of getting it and prefers to rely on well honed traditions of electoral bribery rather than appeals for solidarity and support.

    How can this Chinese New Year message be rated? One out of ten, and that for cheek only. Taib can think only in terms of threats and bribes to maintain his position. They wont work in Sarawak any more than they have elsewhere. Better get the citation loaded. Take off time is closer than you think!

    HIS MASTERS VOICE

    Sarawak CM Taib is a worried man. He no longer speaks of a massive win in the State election that he must call very soon. Far from it, he has had to resort to calling in PM Najib to try to raise some support for BN in that election.

    It is a measure of the desperation of both men that a rescue visit, previously unplanned, was arranged at the last minute. In Miri BN state assemblymen allegedly, submitted reports, allegedly long demanded by Taib, on the problems of their constituencies. That, if it proves to be so, would be a remarkable feat given that so few of them go anywhere near the places that elected them at any time.

    If these reports actually exist they will either be full of fantasies about the alleged popularity of BN or they will acknowledge the truth that BN has totally lost the confidence of the electorate. To know that this is so it is necessary only to look at what Taib had to say to the Chinese community in his New Year message.

    Another question. Why Najib? Wh! y is it necessary that the federal PM should spend time trying to prop up a failed State administration? And, incidentally, spend taxpayers money on trying to do so. The answer is that Sarawak has no remaining confidence in Taib and if BN is not to be swept away in the election Najib will have to give reasons why this should not happen.

    Here he is in real difficulty. The promises he made in the past have not been realised. A clinic without a doctor! Land reform but no proper funding to make it happen. Where is his credibility? Almost as near zero as that of Taib!

    A waste of time. A waste of public money. A demonstration of BNs Sarawak death throes and a mirror for the future course of events when the federal elections take place. Will Najib risk everything to help Taib by calling simultaneous federal elections? Will he cut his own throat? Time will tell and the final outcome will be the same in either case. BN wipeout.

    FOOD SECURITY?

    In a propaganda release, designed to try to justify the huge public expense of the mission by Taib to Arab countries to try to promote the Tanjong Manis halal hub, it is claimed that over RM 650 million has been committed by investors to projects in the hub.

    Nonsense! Letters of understanding are no more than promises to look at possible investments at some future date. Worth no more than the paper they are written on and no kind of justification for the expense of the mission.

    The real test will come when potential investors, if any appear, cost the projects puffed by Taib. No one will pay more than they have to for anything and this applies to halal foods as to any other product. The Arab countries need to import foodstuffs and they do so all the time. They have established and reliable suppli! ers and will not abandon these in favour of the hub unless the latter can provide continuous reliable quality products at lower prices than they are currently paying.

    How can this happen when their actual food suppliers have already invested their capital and built up their market? Can Taib conjure billions from the sky to establish rival industries? Will he even be there to do so after the election? That is only one of the many questions potential Gulf investors will need the answer to. And they will certainly do nothing until they have it.

    THE RULE OF THE GAME.

    These were the exact words of Taib speaking about the coming election. Those areas that dont vote BN may not get anything, thats the rule of the game said Taib; adding, inaccurately, that this is also the case in the USA. It seems that, despite his alleged billions allegedly parked in that country he knows very little about the US system of government.

    There are, of course, rules for elections. Taib knows them well since he has totally ignored them in past elections, brazenly offering bribes and threats to influence voters to choose BN. That may have worked in the past but it will not work this time. Now the voters know what he, his large family and his cronies have been doing with the national wealth and would continue to do if they were foolish enough to put him back in power.

    This time Pakatan will scrutinise the election very closely in all areas of the State. Evidence of election offences and bribery in general will be collected so that election results can be contested wherever BN appear to have got a majority. No matter that the Police, controlled by KL, may suffer temporary blindness during the polling; the evidence will still be there.

    There is another rule of which Taib might be mindful. It is contained in the Penal Code and prescribes that thieves go to jail and major thieves go there for a very long time. Cell life is a lot different from palace life; as will be discovered.

    FUTILE

    Ever since the art of printing was discovered men have tried to influence others by printed materials, books, newspapers, magazines and so on. There is nothing wrong with that. Other people may be impressed by written words or may regard them with derision. It is an individual choice. That choice is exactly what dictators down the ages have hated and feared and tried by all means to remove.

    Recent dictators, like Hitler and Stalin, and a multitude of smaller examples, have enjoyed considerable success in muzzling public opinion and expressions of popular thought. Print and broadcast media need fixed facilities to operate. Printing presses or broadcasting equipment, offices, distribution facilities and many other physical things that governments can control if they wish to. Anyone living in Malaysia today knows the extent to which the papers and the television are subject to government pressure and control. A raft of non democratic laws allows the government to control the news and/or lock up, without trial, those who refuse to conform to government instructions.

    The adverse results of this ability to control public opinion have been seen in election results since the country first attained independence. Now all that has come to a shuddering halt. The papers still appear. The TV still broadcasts. But, for the first time in nearly 50 years the public has access to a new, uncontrollable, source of information; the Internet.

    Electronic media are available to everyone instantly. They need no offices or printing presses. They need not be physically in the countries where they are seen, so they cannot be censored. They are not individual entities that can be bought over or bought out. In short there is nothing the d! ictators of this world can do to control them or what appears on them.

    In Sarawak Taib Mahmud has been learning this painful lesson and he clearly does not appreciate it. Used to being instantly obeyed in whatever he orders he cannot stomach the electronic criticism and revelations of recent months. Most hurtful of all to him is the fact that there is nothing he can do about it.

    Maybe this is why, when he does have a limited opportunity to censor something, he seizes the chance. It is certain that the recent disgraceful censoring of the official record of the State Assembly could not have happened without his approval, and probably on his direct orders. The remarks of an opposition Member detailing misconduct and illegalities were simply censored out of the record of that days proceedings and her complaints and demands for rectification have been ignored by the Speaker. Why would he persist in such improper conduct if not ordered to do so? And who can give such orders if not CM Taib?

    Well, this outrageous conduct can be put right; and will be put right by the new Pakatan administration as one of the many, the very many, things that will have to be done to restore democracy in Sarawak and make Taib/BN no more than a scandalous unhappy memory.

    This is the personal opinion of the writer, Apai M. This blog does not endorse the view unless specified.



    Filed under: corruption, Politics Tagged: Anak Sarawak Bangsa Malaysia, corruption, Save Sarawak, Taib Mahmud
    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...