Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Opinions: BN Vs PKR

  • Everyone has an opinion on something or another. Many people prefer to keep to themselves while others try to find suitable platforms to express their view. By nature, I have always had strong opinion on issues especially with regards to issues related to matters close to my heart. By my way of upbringing, we are usually direct (blunt) and say things the way we see it. One skill that I dont have is cakap berlapik. To some it is an important skill but I feel that it also a source of problems as it brings out meaning which is varies with different people.

  • Before the era of blogging, I express my views publicly via letters to the editor column. Out of hundreds, one gets published. Usually the one that is supportive of the government or carries a minimal criticism of our country leaders and their policies. Today blog has given us the freedom to express openly. This is a good thing but like printed paper, the blog is just a medium. As with all opinions there will be supporters and there will be detractors.

  • In my blog, apart from the government, the regular readers who commented also express their views on what I have written. From my observation, there are 2 major groups in my blog. One is supporter of PR and the other is BN. One small group claims that they are neutral but it does not take much to appreciate that they are not neutral.

  • When it comes to comparing the performance of PR and BN government, many people compare them in an unfairly manner. If we want to compare an apple, it has to be compared with another apple. It cannot be compared with oranges. BN is the Federal Government. It has vast resources. It has vast propaganda network. Someone suggested that I do an objective comparison between PR and BN government in solving the UK Bistari housing project. I agree that we must be objective and make an equitable comparison. By being equitable it does not mean equ! al. We h ave to into account the handicap that each group faces.

  • The best way to compare a government in PR ruled state is to compare before and after March 2008. We have to see which government is better despite the limitations that they faced in their effort to help the people. I dont what is happening in other areas much but in Ampang, I appreciate that the local government is more interactive than before. They are more approachable and do things in the spirit of consultation. The high handed attitude has reduced tremendously. In this aspect, I would say PR is better. Let us be fair when comparing and take into account the respective government handicap.

    Gong Xi Fa Chai to all Malaysian irrespective of religion.


  • Malaysians Scammed by Mamak Again

    MM vs MM

    demotivational posters - WOW

    WOW
    Do bullets really cost that much these days?


    Trust TDM to come up with a side whack on the PR. It just dawned on me that TDM’s quarrels with Minister Mentor Lee is most likely driven by a real dark motive and is not just expending hot gas.

    It came just before the Tenang by-elections and is continuing into the Merlimau by-elections. I think the champion ultra nationalist ex-PM is using confederate MM Lee to raise the nationalist heckles of the Malays for elections purposes. Whether MM Lee went along fully cooperating or was manipulated by TDM is anybody’s guess.

    From the comments to news reports in MT and other sites, it appears that super chauvinists were also fooled to help raise the heckles of Malay nationalism. Dumb asses got fooled by TDM again. They got fooled in the past and will continue to get fooled in the future. This is almost a guarantee.

    So all those who whacked TDM and praised MM Lee or praised Singapore lost PR the Tenang by-elections. The corollary is that TDM won the Tenang by-elections for BN single handedly.

    Heeheeheee all round.

    Hopefully people will wise up before the Merlimau by-elections.

    'My name is Anwar and I'm not a terrorist'....

    ... PookeeMamak is the terrorist.

    Poking fun at the federal government latest claim against him - that he has 'terrorist' links - PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim quoted a line from the Bollywood blockbuster 'My Name is Khan'.

    "My name is Anwar and I am not a terrorist," he said, mimicking the character played by Indian mega-star Shah Rukh Khan. The performance was received with roars of laughter from the thousand-strong PKR crowd attending the maiden run of the party leadership's road show in Petaling Jaya last night.

    Anwar was responding to a statement by Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein that he will be probed for suspected links to a 'terrorist group' originating from Saudi Arabia. The minister had said last week: "I have asked the terrorist task force and I have asked the special branch, and they are linking up with Saudi (Arabia's) intelligence to find out to what extent Anwar is linked to this terrorist group.”

    Hishammuddin was responding to a CNN report which had claimed to have had sight of documents purporting that a secret Saudi Arabian probe was launched after premier Najib Abdul Razak's complaint that personalities in the kingdom were funding Anwar. Hishammuddin admitted he had yet gone through the footage, but the CNN report also said the probe had not found any evidence of such links. The PKR leadership has rubbished the claim as being just another 'get Anwar witch hunt'.

    Panadol and PD

    Commenting on jibes by Najib that he(Anwar) would be "disrobed" and "struck down by fever" should they go mano-a-mano in a debate on the economy and Pakatan Rakyat's 100-day reform pledge, Anwar lobbed back barbs of his own. "I shall ask (wife and PKR president Dr) Wan Azizah (Wan Ismail) for a bottle of Panadol and I shall down them all to take care of the fever.

    "Is Najib an expert at disrobing? This is an economic issue, it is not about personal issues. This is not a hotel room in PD," said Anwar as the crowd jeered at the premier.

    He reiterated that he is willing to extend the debate to personal matters if that is what Najib wants. "We can debate the Orange Book and then we can also debate personal issues...We shall see who is struck down by fever and who is disrobed," he said.

    These assaults on his character, said Anwar, are another of BN's desperate strategies to discourage him from continuing his struggle. "They can do their worst. What else can they do to me? They have imprisoned me, punched me, kicked me, stripped me naked and the last time they even measured... (my body parts, for the sodomy trial)."

    However, he said he would not be as cruel as BN, should Pakatan come into power. "I will not imprison him (Najib). I shall send him as our ambassador to Mongolia instead," he quipped.

    Despite the incessant attacks by BN, defections and internal strife, Anwar assured party members that PKR has emerged stronger, ready to face whatever that the ruling coalition throws at it. "We are now strong and we shall put our best machinery and leaders to serve," he said.Anwar also repeated warnings that all non-performers must buck up or face the axe. "You perform, you stay; you don't perform, you go," he said.

    But he again accepted part of the blame - and apologised - for having chosen weak leaders who have since hopped out of the party.

    Baca 'Nama saya Anwar dan saya bukan pengganas' di sini.

    source:malaysiakini

    cheers.

    An analysis of the Tenang by–election from the Indian perspective


    Here is a preliminary analysis and some telling conclusions about the Indian votes after the Tenang by-election based on Tony Pua’s report in MK 30th Jan 2011.

    Here is an initial analysis of the Indian votes in Tenang:

    2008

    2011

    Total Indians voted

    1104

    694

    Indian votes for BN

    550

    555

    Indians voted for PR

    554

    144

    This analysis is very telling.

    1) What BN got in 2008, it was able to defend in 2011.

    2) PR lost support of almost 400 Indian voters 2008- 2011.

    3) But that did not mean BN got those lost votes. These Indian voters very smartly just abstained from voting either PR or BN– they just stayed home on a rainy day. The rains make more difference to them than either BN or PR.


    Now, playing HRP and HINDRAF into this Tenang election could produce a picture like this –

    1) 90%,of the Indians would have come out to vote if HRP/Hindraf were a factor in this election- in spite of the rain.

    2) That will be 1500 voters who would have voted.

    3) All those who abstained would very likely have voted HRP/HINDRAF.

    4) That is already about 950 voters.

    5) Then add about half those who voted BN vote for HRP, that will be another 275.

    6) That makes for a total of 1,200 votes.

    7) A swing of over 1000 votes would have occurred.


    If PR takes HRP as its equal partner then all these votes would have gone to PR.

    9) The margin here would not have been 3707, it would have been 1707.

    All fthe above does not even consider the “oomph” factor that HINDRAF/HRP would have introduced into this election, hed they been a factor.

    Does PR have the vision to see where HRP/HINDRAF stands or will they foolishly keep repeating that the HINDRAF factor is all but lost.

    Clearly there is a serious leadership vacuum for the Indians that only HRP and HINDRAF can fill. No amount of screwing around this idea by PR or anyone else is going to help PR in the least. Getting to Putrajaya seems to be an increasingly receding vision for PR, the more they screw around. Latest, is their attempt to get Surendran on their side. Did that help? They still lost Indian support, big time, in Tenang.

    What we see increasingly in these by elections is a sample from which to conclude about what could happen in a General Election. If PR wants to get to Putrajaya there is no alternative for them but to sit down and hammer out a deal with HRP/HINDRAF, before the window shuts.

    Why I will vote for HRP/Hindraf and not PAS/PKR/DAP or BN/Umno


    I cannot get a job in the government, a scholarship, a job with Ah Pek Sales and Marketing Bhd, a place in MARA, a cheap home that I can afford, a meager 10 acres in some FELDA scheme somewhere, a loan from the bank, or teachers that won't call me Pariah to my face during sastera lessons, and I know that only HRP/HINDRAF finds that this is simply not acceptable.

    I am a Malaysian. But that statement needs to be qualified 99% of the time in this country.

    I am an Indian Malaysian; and the only two times the fact that I am of the Indian persuasion did not matter was when I cast my vote. As an Indian Malaysian, my vote is counted as one, just like the vote of a Chinese Malaysian or any other; and when I slap down my passport in some foreign land.

    I would love to vote on the basis of who will lead this country better and reduce the wastage and corruption that has become endemic in this land I love, but I cannot do that for a few simple reasons.

    1. I am more likely to be killed by the authorities, either when and if I find myself in custody, or when some dude in blue decides to get some target practice done on the roads. Now, I have followed enough extra judicial killings to know that PAS/PKR/DAP will not raise much of a fuss if I am the victim but I do know for a fact that HINDRAF/HRP will.

    2. I get thrown in the slammer for some reason or other, maybe I had witnessed a fellow Malaysian (Indian Malaysian to be exact) get beaten to death and decided to open my big mouth. Once again I know that PAS/PKR/DAP won't even pick up the phone, but HRP/HINDRAF will.

    3. I had knocked some girl up before I was thrown into jail, and the poor girl now cannot get a birth certificate for the baby, as the daddy (yours truly) is busy learning how to survive on 800 calories a day behind bars. I know PAS/PKR/DAP won't even find out the name picked out for the baby, but HRP/HINDRAF will. Now if the girl decides to give up the baby, or she dies giving birth to it, PAS/PKR/DAP will have no issue with the baby now having a Bin/Binti in its name, but HRP/HINDRAF definitely will.

    I believe you get my drift now.

    I cannot get a job in the government, a scholarship, a job with Ah Pek Sales and Marketing Bhd, a place in MARA, a cheap home that I can afford, a meager 10 acres in some FELDA scheme somewhere, a loan from the bank, or teachers that won't call me Pariah to my face during sastera lessons, and I know that only HRP/HINDRAF finds that this is simply not acceptable.

    So you say I should vote for PAS/PKR/DAP because of the greater good. Okay I will, with a couple of conditions.

    Give it to me in writing that the next time I am at risk of getting shot or beaten to death by the police, one of you will come and take my place. Tell me that the next time I apply for a job in the private or public sector, you will give up yours so that I can have means of livelihood. Tell me the next time someone decides that I am not entitled to what another Malaysian is, because I am an Indian Malaysian, you will march on the streets and hound those responsible until things change for the better.

    Tell me that, and I will give your beloved PAS/PKR/DAP my vote. If you cannot do that, there is an easier way for you to get my vote. Tell your PAS/PKR/DAP to sit down and talk to HRP, MCLM, KITA, UBF, SNAP and whoever else is out there who is anti BN. If you cannot even do that, I suggest you take your opinion on who I should vote for and stick it where the sun don't shine.

    PAS intensifies campaign against 'saman ekor'


    The PAS-linked group distributes leaflets against Automatic Enforcement System for traffic summons at toll plazas around KL.


    Kempen Anti Saman Ekor (Kase) today intensified its campaign against the privatisation of the Automatic Enforcement System (AES) by distributing leaflets to road users at several toll plazas around Kuala Lumpur.

    NONEIts chairperson Mahfuz Omar, who is also the PAS parliamentarian for Pokok Sena, led the Kase volunteers distributing leaflets at the Sungai Besi toll plaza this afternoon.

    "Today is the day that the new amendments to the Road Transport Act comes into effect.

    "We believe the amendments (including the privatisation of AES) is not going to solve anything but will instead cause more problems and raise more questions," Mahfuz told reporters.

    All told the group plans to distribute 20,000 leaflets targeting Gombak, Serdang, Sg Buloh, Shah Alam and Sg Besi toll plazas.

    The initiative is being carried out by Selangor PAS Youth and the Kase secretariat.

    The movement which was founded in August last year by the PAS consumer and environmental affairs bureau initially campaigned against saman ekor or traffic summons via photographic evidence.

    NONEHowever, it later expanded its target to include the privatisation of AES, claiming that such a move only enriches government cronies and in effect represents the privatisation of traffic enforcement into a for profit venture.

    They plan to kick-off the second stage of the Kase campaign in Bandar Baru Bangi on Feb 12, to be officiated by Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.

    Amendments to the Act 1987, which was approved by Senate on Dec 22, will come into force beginning Feb 1.

    Amendments that come into force include expanding the powers of Road Transport Department to take action against traffic offenders on all roads in the country, including areas such as farms, gardens, villages, residential areas and multi-storey car parks.

    The AES would comprehensively monitor the traffic conditions on the roads, including whether motorists were flouting traffic rules, speeding or running red lights.

    Violators of traffic regulations will be given 30 days to pay up their traffic summons tickets, failing which their cases will be automatically referred to the court for further action, resulting in the violators having to pay fines of not less than RM1,000.

    Terror links: Another 'get Anwar' witch hunt

    Either the idea was being spun by the BN-controlled media or home minister was mislead, says PKR's Tian Chua.

    PKR leadership has attributed the Home Ministry move towards investigating PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim's alleged links to militant Muslim groups as a witch hunt.

    While campaigning during the Tenang by-election, Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said that the country's Special Branch and the government's anti-terrorism taskforce had begun probing a report alleging Anwar has links with international terrorist groups.

    The remarks were made following a CNN report that it had sighted a document purporting a secret Saudi Arabian probe had been launched into complaints by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak that Saudi personalities were funding Anwar.

    The CNN report said that the probe found no such evidence.

    NONEHishammuddin, however, said 'a CNN report' had linked Anwar to a terrorist organisation and that he had asked the Special Branch to find out to what extent is Anwar's involvement with the alleged group.

    Commenting on this today, PKR vice-president Tian Chua said: “The home minister should check his facts before making the statements.

    “The whole issue began with CNN report and the prime minister himself pressuring Saudi to investigate the-so-called financial support of Anwar and, maybe in general, the opposition.

    “The findings clearly indicated that there were no such things and it also revealed that there are more alarming network that has been funded by Saudi,” he told reporters at a press conference at PKR headquarters today.

    “Unfortunately (either) the idea was being spun by (the) BN-controlled media or the home minister is was being mislead,” added the Batu parliamentarian.

    Asked if PKR would be open to a probe by the home ministry, Tian stressed that in the event investigations target Anwar, it would be a “witch-hunt or a red herring” against the opposition.

    He added there are other issues that should be the priority of the home ministry, such the non-compliance to international standards of information disclosure, abolition of preventive detention laws and security issues such as the worsening cases of human trafficking.

    “If there are any investigations of that sort, it would be for cheap publicity, and not (over a) real security concern,” said Tian.

    Echoing Tian on the matter, PKR communications chief Nik Nazmi Ahmad said claims had been made that hundreds of billions of ringgit had flow out of the country illegally, but this has been dismissed by the government as not warranting a probe.

    “The government is of two minds (on the matter). As Mukhriz says, there is no need for investigation, but the prime minister states otherwise,” said in reference to Deputy International Trade and Industry Minister Mukhriz Mahathir.

    When it comes to such claims as “non-existent” links to terrorism, however, the government belies its double standards, said Nik Nazmi.

    PKR goes on a roadshow to repair dented image


    The programme also intends to improve the bonds between the party’s central leadership and its divisions nationwide.


    PKR today kicked off its nationwide road show after its much-hyped internal election last year left the party's credibility challenged.

    The road show dubbed as “Program Jelajah Pimpinan” will begin at Empire Gallery, Subang Jaya at 4pm this afternoon by PKR vice-president and Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar as well as party's communication chief and Seri Setia state assemblyperson Nik Nazmi Ahmad.

    It was noted in a study conducted by University Malaya's (UM) Centre of Democracy and Election Studies (Umcedel) that PKR's popularity had been going downhill following adverse media coverage into its internal crisis.

    More than half of respondents the Umcedel's survey expressed loss of confidence in the leadership of the party's de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim.

    The programme, which intends to improve the bond between the party's central leadership and its divisions nationwide, is expected to be conducted in 30 locations - those areas contested by PKR in elections as well as areas held to be 'strategic'.

    Announcing this morning, the party's information chief Muhammad Nur Manuty said that registration counters will also be opened up to enable new memberships.

    “This is significant as it is the first time the PKR's central office is playing a direct role in organising this events with the divisions,” said Muhammad, who added that it will be conducted for a period of three months ending April.

    Asked if this was the party's preparation for the next general election, Nurul Izzah, who was also at the press conference, said: “We don't know when the prime minister will decide to call for the election, so the opposition has to be prepared all the time.”

    Nik Nazmi added that among the issues that will be their objective is propagating Pakatan's proposed 100-day plan dubbed the 'Orange Book' to the targeted electorates.

    The 13th general election is due before 2013, but rumours of snap polls being held this year heightened recently after BN regained a number of seats it had lost during the 2008 general polls in the by-elections that have been conducted since.

    Pakatan needs to get real


    The Tenang by-election result clearly showed, once again, that in all the idiocy and immaturity of Malaysian politics after 53-plus years, racialism is its soul, and all Malaysian political parties inevitably will make communalism its perennial political concubine.

    Manjit Bhatia, Malaysiakini

    Post-Tenang, the Pakatan Rakyat opposition, led by the DAP, has begun picking on a carcass of its own making. These are slim pickings; there's barely any residual flesh after the Tenang
    humiliation.

    Even DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang cannot say, in all truthfulness, that he has a bone to pick with the MCA. Whether the MCA recovered, or lost, more of the Tenang Chinese votes seems utterly irrelevant.

    Likewise PAS, which, clearly, failed to engender itself with the Malays in that constituency. The bigger picture cannot be missed. If Pakatan chooses to lose sight of this, it'll do so at its own peril.

    But Pakatan seems hell-bent on further embarrassment.

    Lim wasted no time in trying to score political points from the MCA. He tried jawboning MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek over whether Tenang's Chinese voted for MCA for its anti-Islamic state rhetoric or for Pakatan for its justice rhetoric.

    And on Tuesday, PKR assemblyperson for Seri Setia, Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, said members who did not share Pakatan's multiracialism weren't fit to be part of the opposition party.

    On the same day, PKR said it would hit the road to sell itself to a voting public - one that has become sceptical of the party's promises, let alone its ignominy after years of bruising internal strife and defections.

    Crikey. You'd think PKR would just stop and think long and hard before stumbling into the next pit like a bleeding, blind drunk.

    I wrote about a year ago that all Umno-BN has to do is sit back a little and watch Pakatan self-combust and implode. That's just what has happened. And the fire's not out yet.

    I said a while ago that the problem for Pakatan is its predilection for MAD - mutually assured destruction. It seems, by the latest incantation from the Pakatan leadership, it hasn't learnt a single lesson: People want policies and action, not more racialist jousting or communalist posturing.

    But if you give them the latter, Pakatan just won't win against Umno-BN's election machinery and money, come hell or high water.

    The high water came. Hell, too.

    I wrote last week that the problem with Umno-BN is the same as with Pakatan: it has mediocre politicians who are on a power trip.

    They are so egotistical, so self-righteous, that they have forgotten those on whom they really count for their power - the people.

    Umno-BN has been on the nose for a long time, but Pakatan just does not have the slightest clue as how to exploit that odious odour to its advantage. Instead, it screwed it up left, right and centre.

    Party politics may serve Pakatan's immediate vested interests. But these are hopeless if people can't see what the coalition really stands for, and what it will do by way of action-effective programmes that are clear expressions of the party's unambiguous policies.

    Consider US President Barack Obama's last State of the Union address. Blind Freddy saw through Obama to know he has sold out to America's large business groups, including, or especially, Wall Street, because he fears becoming a one-term wonder. And he could still wind up becoming a one-term wonder.

    I don't see Pakatan's policies. I never have, since its inception. Not a single one, and not on a monkey's hair breadth.

    If Pakatan wants to be a serious player in Malaysian national politics, it must come to terms that it is intellectually bankrupt of policy ideas, especially where and when they count, such as the Tenang by-election.

    Instead, Pakatan thinks that it is clever enough to woo voters simply through communalism. In the end, even this backfired for it in Tenang.

    Who cares about the floods? By what percentage of votes would that have changed the overall outcome, anyway? Seriously. Why look for stupid, childish excuses?

    And who cares what the ethnic voting trends were. They were what they were, and, by and large they were expected. Some things in Malaysia never change.

    Did not DAP's Lim say weeks before the by-election that paring back some of Umno-BN's 2,400-plus vote majority, but not winning the seat, would, in itself, be a moral victory?

    What humbug. Where's the moral victory now? Face facts: Pakatan was trounced in Tenang. No question. And it only has itself to blame.

    You can use Marx and Engels or Marshall Berman's dictum here (although Berman borrowed this from Marx and Engels, anyway) that all that is solid melts into air. When you look at the 2008 federal election result in today's context, you would have to ask if Mark and Engels were right from the start.

    Lim had given up on Tenang even before the first vote was cast. That was Lim's big cop-out - and a folly so big it was painfully laughable.

    For all his intelligence and experience, what he and Pakatan continue to seriously lack is a set of strategic minds, analytical minds: people who are good at coming up with very well researched, credible, intelligent and powerful electioneering strategies and policy-making and deliverance.

    What Pakatan, like Umno-BN, is good at is fobbing off its real problems, crimping itself by taking on airs, as it were, with a build-up of mediocre talent within its senior ranks.

    I have no idea what Anwar Ibrahim is doing or what he truly stands for anymore. What are you doing, Anwar? What do you really stand for?

    Rather than sitting down and doing some serious soul-searching on just where it went wrong in Tenang, and why, and then locating all the problems on a national canvas and making strategic reparations to almost all of its political facets, internal and external, Lim, like a dog with a bone, tried to immediately score worthless points by picking a fight with a scandal-riven, incompetent and pinhead MCA leadership.

    It seems to me that PKR, DAP and PAS are like ships in the night on a vast ocean.

    Lim may as well have put up a ragged dummy befitting Chua in his garage and thumped the hell out of it, or, better still, pin prick a Chua voodoo doll for all that's worth.

    Perhaps what the humiliating Tenang loss suggests is that it may be time for Lim to pack up politics altogether and take with him so many of the has-been in the DAP and PKR.

    At the current rate, Pakatan won't come within a sniff of denting Umno-BN's chances of regaining its two-thirds majority or improving it at the next general election. If Umno-BN wins by two-thirds or more, it could become the killer blow for Pakatan.

    Therein lies the problem for the Pakatan leadership. Not what's up, but time's up.

    Prime Minister Najib Razak could call a poll in six to nine months and catch PKR on the hop. Easy to do, given PKR's serious internal and external strife. But that call will be dictated by the shape of the economy. It's too volatile.

    Even if Najib were to call a federal poll in 2012, PKR would still not be ready.

    The Tenang by-election result clearly showed, once again, that in all the idiocy and immaturity of Malaysian politics after 53-plus years, racialism is its soul, and all Malaysian political parties inevitably will make communalism its perennial political concubine.

    Look at the Indian vote in Tenang, which went to BN. What does that say? Other than saying Indian voters are typically pathetic and batty, it's more the case of better the devil they know than not. Pakatan offered them nothing, so the Indians chose Umno-BN's satanic lordship as their saviour. Go figure.

    I doubt Pakatan can see its real problems. Or wants to. Maybe it has become very good at self-denial, that it can gloss over its problems, paper over whatever cracks that appear in its façade. Assuming that that is all there is, though I doubt it.

    Pakatan lacks foresight. It lacks depth. It lacks scope. All these at almost every level and on all fronts. Nor the organic intelligence to not only capture vital middle class votes but to also cut through the chaff of rigid, embedded communalistic politics at the lower levels of the Malaysian social hierarchy.

    SNAP – The stubborn Dayak whore.


    antubeduru.blogspot.com

    For a party which claims to have 100,000 members, it was quite a disastrous showing when less than 100 members turned up for SNAP’s latest symposium held at the Grand Continental Hotel in Kuching over the weekend. The large function room was sparsely populated with a smattering of over 80 people and even this small gathering of so-called strong supporters gradually thinned out as the day wore on; a slight improvement from the 50 people who turned up for Sibu previously.

    Originally Posted HERE

    Pakatan Rakyat

    Spammed by the Prime Minister!



    By Kee Thuan Chye
    Malaysian Digest
    Tuesday, 01 February 2011

    NO less than the Prime Minister has just spammed me! In an e-mail wishing me Happy Chinese New Year. I’m not pleased. In fact, when I got the e-mail, I freaked out. How did he get my address? I take strong umbrage against whoever gave it to him. It is an invasion of my privacy.

    Najib Razak (or rather, his assistants) reportedly sent out that e-mail to 1.5 million people. The Star reported that many were happy to get it – in a report quoting only three people. And two of them had Muslim-sounding names! From the tweets I’ve seen, it seems many Muslims have been getting the e-mail too. Some tweeters considered the greeting “insincere”, some suggested reporting the matter to Cyber 999 and even the police.

    Many questioned how Najib or his assistants got their e-mail addresses. There’s a theory going round that it came from the database of a media conglomerate. If this is true, the practice is, of course, not right. It contravenes the cyberworld law of data privacy. Whoever gave the data to him showed that they did not respect that privacy.

    My wife got a CNY greeting from Najib too – via an SMS. Did her telco give her number to Najib and Co? Is that a proper thing to do? This episode shows that the personal details of Malaysians are not safe from prying and abuse. And that Big Brother is watching. That’s a scary prospect.

    Najib’s greeting is yet another of the public relations campaigns he has been mounting for more than a year now. Those who are aware realize they are nothing more than efforts to win votes for the next general election, but there are plenty of others who are not so clued-in.

    This Chinese New Year campaign seems to have had an effect, especially on fence-sitters. Some of them said they were touched. They seemed swayed into believing that the PM cared enough to send them the greeting. This is not surprising, because gullible Malaysians often fall for cheap tricks all too easily. The number who have fallen victim to Internet scams must be substantial. As a politician of long experience, Najib must surely know that.

    More public relations at work can be seen in the awarding of datukships in conjunction with Federal Territory Day. The number of Indians being awarded this year is relatively high. Seen in relation to Barisan Nasional’s bid to sustain its regaining of the Indian vote, this is to be expected.

    Among the awardees, also expected, is K Rajagopal, the national football coach who recently guided his team to winning the small-time AFF Suzuki Cup. I’ve written before that his achievement in that competition is not something worthy of a datukship, but we all know that football ranks high in the popular Malaysian imagination, so not only has Rajagopal been made a datuk; also awarded is former football ace Santokh Singh.

    Najib’s own special assistant, Ravindren Chelliah Ponniah, also gets to be a datuk. So do a couple of other Singhs. And guess who else? R Thanenthiran, president of Parti Makkal Sakthi Malaysia. For what? For forsaking Hindraf and crossing to the other side?

    What about the Datuk Seri title for the president of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), M Kayveas? What has Kayveas done of late to deserve this higher award? That’s how the next general election is going to be won – by public relations. Of which BN being in government has plenty of resources to invest in.

    Similarly, it has the resources to hijack Pakatan Rakyat’s recently announced pledge to abolish toll on all highways within 100 days of coming to power. A few days ago, Najib declared – in perfect time for the Tenang by-election – that the toll for the Salak to Taman Connaught stretch on the East-West Link Expressway would be abolished by May. He also announced that the toll for two other expressways would not be increased for the next five years. According to him, no compensation would be paid to the highway concessionaires, implying that it would not cost taxpayers anything.

    Whether this is true remains to be seen. An engineer of long experience in the relevant industry that I spoke to is very sceptical about it. He feels that there will be other ways of compensation made to the concessionaires that will ultimately involve payment by the rakyat.

    Last December, when Pakatan Rakyat announced its pledge to abolish tolls, Najib pooh-poohed it and said it was irresponsible. But now he’s going for it himself. He has even hinted that there will be more good news on the same subject soon. I suspect he will make the North-South Expressway toll-free. He might announce this on the eve of the next general election and make a major score from it. If that happens, you can bet that the taxpayer will not be able to avoid compensating the concessionaires in one way or another. Regardless of what Najib might say then to the contrary.

    We have to be circumspect. We have to learn not to be so easily fooled. On the surface, a proposition may sound good, but there can be hidden drawbacks underlying it which of course will be kept secret at the time of announcement. We have also to be aware that all these public relations efforts made by Najib are intended for one main purpose. Apart from that, they also distract public attention from the questionable goings-on.

    Only last week, it was revealed that there is now a new department in the Prime Minister’s Office called FLOM – for First Lady of Malaysia – manned by a staff of six. And it looks after the operational needs of Najib’s wife, Rosmah Mansor.

    Never in our history has there ever been such a department. It reeks of nepotism and other things besides. Why should the PM’s wife have a department all to herself? Are there institutionalized provisions for such a thing? Who is paying for the upkeep of this department? We need to snap out of our distracted state and pressure Najib to justify the setting-up of FLOM. Let’s see how his public relations advisers will respond to that. For CNY, they came up with spam; for FLOM, will they come up with flam?

    Just for fun, here are two Urban Dictionary definitions of “flom” – 1) To untie someone’s shoe lace while they aren’t looking, so they get pissed off and have to retie it (e.g. “Hey, stop it! This is the fifth time you’ve flommed me!”); 2) to do something sexual to someone of the opposite sex.

    Either way you look at it, it sounds naughty!

    Creating a harmonious, just, democratic and competitive nation remains the single greatest challenge of Malaysians

    The creation of a harmonious, just, democratic and competitive nation, which is a model to the world as an united, tolerant and successful multi-racial, multi-lingual, multi-cultural and multi-religious society, remains the greatest challenge of Malaysians.

    Nation-building should not be a zero-sum game but must be a win-win formula for all Malaysians, regardless of race, religion or region.

    Malaysia has strayed from this formula, with a world diaspora of a million-strong Malaysians – testimony that Malaysians are helping to create the greatness of other nations instead of their own country.

    Although there is belated official recognition that human capital is even more valuable than natural resources as national assets in the era of globalisation, there is still no political will to introduce nation-building policies that will develop and retain Malaysian talent as well as attract foreign talent.

    Slogans like “1Malaysia. People First. Performance Now” will not create a harmonious, just, democratic and competitive nation until and unless Malaysia could be seen by its people and others as a land of equal opportunity to earn a good living and provide a secure, happy life for each individual and family.

    Wishing all Malaysian Chinese a happy and purposeful Chinese New Year of the Rabbit.

    Why PAS lost the battle for Tenang

    Because they're friend of DAP ?


    By Kuek Ser Kuang Keng and Regina Lee | Malaysiakini

    ANALYSIS Even before campaigning for the Tenang by-election started, much had been said that the Jan 30 event would serve as an important testing ground for a BN move to call for a snap general election.

    It was easy to see why. With the racial breakdown of the semi-rural mixed seat being the archetype of most of the voting constituencies of Peninsular Malaysia, Tenang became a litmus test of sorts.

    But is the BN victory with a 3,707-vote majority truly an indication of a return in voter sentiment and support for the ruling coalition? Well, yes and no.

    The rather untimely floods and heavy rainfall – which the locals said were worse than the 2006 Great Johor Flood – had severely affected a few polling stations in the Chinese-majority areas.

    This threw the spanner in the works for any real measure of the true support for both BN and Pakatan Rakyat, where voter turnouts in some areas were as low as 55 percent, as in the case of Bandar Labis Tengah, which is over 95 percent Chinese.

    The rains and floods were also blamed for the poorer turnout rate, which dropped to 66 percent, compared with the 73.52 percent turnout in the 2008 general election. Heavy rain started falling even before the polling centres opened at 8am.

    According to DAP national publicity secretary Tony Pua, the turnout among the Chinese and Indian voters had dropped even more significantly – between 23 and 39 percent for Chinese voters and between 18 and a whopping 54 percent among the Indian voters.

    However, the turnout for Malay voters saw an increase of two percent, to a high of 81 percent.

    Best machinery wins

    The battle during the intensive eight-day campaign period quickly culminated into a competition of machinery, logistics and resources, with BN clearly proving it held the upper hand in this.

    The BN machinery in Johor – the birthplace of Umno – is already known to be the strongest in the country.

    The party strategically mobilised its supporters and the grassroots from around the state, and they descended in droves on their stronghold in the three Felda settlements in the Tenang seat to ferry voters to polling stations.

    When the flood waters rose rapidly, it became a show of ‘who has the most four-wheel-drives’.

    Pakatan party workers complained that the boats and trucks deployed by the various government agencies to transport voters to the polling stations were not put to use evenly, coupled with “selective and discriminatory assistance for PAS supporters”.

    Very few people had expected the floodwaters to be neck-high on the road to SMK Kamarul Ariffin, the polling centre for the district with the highest percentage of Chinese voters (95.7 percent), on polling day.

    With hardly any machinery in comparison with BN, Pakatan was caught off-guard and had to rely heavily on the police and army trucks to transport the Chinese voters they saw as their vote bank.

    The relevant government aid and rescue agencies were said to have stationed most of their men and equipment in the Malay-majority rural areas and the Felda settlements when reports of flash floods started coming in a few days before voting day.

    Under these circumstances, the BN’s declaration, after the results were announced on Sunday night that Tenang again proved the people’s satisfaction with the government and that their support for BN had returned with the increase from the 2,492-vote majority in 2008, was far from convincing.

    Chinese voters still with Pakatan

    The bigger picture post-March 2008 shows a slight shift among voters for both BN and Pakatan. Pakatan still commands the support of the Chinese while BN retains Malay loyalty.

    However, as evident from the past few by-elections, Malay and Indian dissatisfaction with the government has been decreasing, and this resulted in a steady flow of their votes back to the BN.

    The Tenang result shows that BN achieved higher votes in all the Malay-majority polling districts, and won back the two Chinese-majority polling districts it lost in 2008 – Bandar Labis Timur (63.4 percent Chinese), and Labis (58.3 percent).

    BN, and MCA in particular, rejoiced over their victory in three out of the four Chinese-majority polling districts in Tenang.

    However, BN still lost in the near-homogenous polling district of Bandar Labis Tengah, where 95.7 percent of the Chinese voters live.

    Here, support for PAS had increased by 3.2 percent from 66.7 percent in 2008 to 69.9 percent, despite a 20 percent reduction in the voter turnout.

    The DAP sees the BN wins in the polling districts of Bandar Labis Timur and Labis as the result of overwhelming support from the minority Malay and Indian voters.

    Combining the three polling districts of Bandar Labis Timur, Bandar Labis Tengah and Labis – all in Labis town, the 70 percent Chinese support in Bandar Labis Tengah can be extrapolated to the other two polling districts.

    Islamic state no longer a draw

    Though the DAP and MCA dispute the trend among Chinese voters, of key significance to both parties is that MCA’s Islamic state bogey is no longer effective in drawing away the Chinese vote base.

    In fact, it may not even affect cooperation between PAS and DAP in Pakatan – the main factor that caused the collapse of the Barisan Alternatif in 2001.

    Instead, the MCA attack appears to have forged closer cooperation and trust between DAP and PAS, with the two parties quickly rushing to each other’s defence.

    During the campaign, DAP went all out mobilising its machinery from its headquarters in Kuala Lumpur and in Johor, as if it was the party’s own candidate who was contesting. Leaders of both DAP and PAS also took turns speaking at each other’s ceramah.

    While Chinese voters polled by Malaysiakini on the Islamic state issue said they did not care much for this, it remains to be seen whether the issue will continue to be MCA’s driving point in the future.

    On the other hand, the messages of gratitude and promises of development from Umno and BN sit very comfortably with the rural Malay voters.

    With a strong affinity for former Prime Minister Abdul Razak Hussein, the father of Premier Najib Abdul Razak, the Felda settlers – making up more than half of the Malay voters in Tenang – remain an impenetrable Umno bulwark, no matter what the opposition issues are.

    Despite the promising progress of Anak, a PAS-linked NGO specifically for Felda settlers sending messages of the government oppressing the settlers, BN still managed to garner 85.5 to 87.9 percent support in the three settlements in Tenang.

    Much is also due to the failure to break through the information barrier in the rural Malay areas, where Umno-dominated dailies Utusan Malaysia, Berita Harian and Harian Metro are still the main sources of news.

    The much-hyped issue of the controversial novel ‘Interlok’ also hardly made a ripple among the Indian community, with half of them ignorant about it and the other half indifferent.

    And unlike Sibu or Hulu Selangor, where there were distinctive local problems, there appeared to be none in the quiet and idyllic constituency of Tenang, where the rising prices of palm oil and rubber have afforded a good life for the bulk of the voters.

    Save for the freak of nature that came in the form of the massive floods on voting day, there is no persistent problem in the constituency – which also explained the absence of the ‘feel good projects’ that have become standard pledges from state and federal governments in elections.

    Empty messages

    This by-election is not a groundbreaking one to change the course of the nation’s political history.

    Both BN and Pakatan are still sticking to their tried and tested methods, not exploring new options after the 2008 general election.

    While DAP found its appeal among the urban and middle-class voters, PAS was not seen to be breaking away from its image of fuddy-duddy religious conservatism in the rural Malay heartland.

    The third component member of Pakatan, PKR, was largely absent from the campaign on the ground, reflecting its weak grassroots and machinery in Johor.

    And while DAP’s launch of some election gimmick every other day has been catchy with the Chinese voters, a number of whom even stuck the party’s campaign sticker with the word huan (change) on their shirts and helmets, it was not exactly unchartered territory for anyone.

    At the same time, BN’s reliance on the 3M – money, machinery and media – continues to persist after all these decades.

    Both sides had also worked hard to drive their point home: BN with 1Malaysia and Pakatan with its “Orange Book”, the pledge on good governance within 100 days of it being elected.

    But to many of the voters in Tenang (and possibly elsewhere too), these are merely elusive messages. The only time ’1Malaysia’ made an impact in Tenang was when scores of ‘volunteers’ went around giving out goodies during the daytime.

    After sundown, the logo was plastered at the mega dinners hosted by the BN, coupled with splashy entertainment and lucky draw prizes.

    Pakatan can also be faulted for playing the populist card, with many of its ceramah speakers drawing attention to the Pakatan-controlled state governments’ policies, such as free water and ‘welfare money’ for senior citizens.

    While Pakatan had attempted a display of unity, often inviting DAP leaders for ceramah in Felda settlements, and PAS leaders in the Chinese town areas, BN fared poorer, with many of its ceramah being an event for just one party.

    Having said that, holding ceramah was never BN’s campaign strategy, for the coalition has a preference for house-to-house visits and ‘welfare’ programmes, such as free motorcycle servicing and religious classes.

    Moral victory for Cikgu Mala

    Though former assistant district officer Mohd Azahar Ibrahim has been crowned the new Tenang assemblyperson, the moral victory goes to PAS candidate Normala Sudirman.

    Popularly known as ‘Cikgu Mala’, fielding her in the by-election could possibly work wonders for PAS in the long-term in its bid to portray a progressive and open image.

    In contrast to the unsmiling and constantly panting Mohd Azahar, Normala was articulate, demure and poised.

    If PAS plays its cards right, Normala could well be the next Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin, the former Perak MB from PAS who has since found fans among Chinese voters for his multi-cultural approach.

    This, certainly, will not be the last we see of the affable Cikgu Mala.

    Anwar tells Pakatan to stay course after Tenang loss


    February 02, 2011

    A protester waves a shoe at Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's televised speech, in Tahrir Square, Cairo February 1, 2011. — Reuters pic
    PETALING JAYA, Feb 2 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has urged Pakatan Rakyat (PR) supporters to remain steadfast in their fight against Barisan Nasional (BN) despite the defeat in the Tenang by-election last weekend.

    The PR de facto leader said it would take much time and effort to galvanise Malaysians into political action, citing the unprecedented wave of popular protests which he said was only now sweeping through the Arab world after decades of authoritarian rule.

    “How many hundreds, thousands have been killed in Egypt? Not just this year but decades now — hanged, shot, disappeared,” he told the 600-strong crowd at PKR’s first Jelajah Pemimpin 2011 roadshow in Taman Sri Manja last night.

    “And only then has this happened. Don’t think this is the easy path,” Anwar said, referring to the Egyptian protests since January 25.

    He told PR supporters to not lose hope following PAS candidate Normala Sudirman’s loss to BN’s Mohd Azahar Ibrahim in Tenang, and to remember Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim’s fight for the Ijok seat.

    He said Khalid had managed to wrest the seat from MIC in Election 2008, less than a year after suffering heavy losses there to BN.

    “Yes, we lost Tenang. We accept it with patience,” the Permatang Pauh MP said.

    He stressed that PR’s machinery had to be strengthened in preparation for the next general election to ensure that the opposition could carry on its struggle against BN’s “corrupt leadership”.

    Anwar added that PR component parties would work hand-in-hand to field their strongest line-up in the general election, speculated to take place in the fourth quarter of this year.

    BN retained the Tenang seat on Sunday with a 3,707-vote majority, short of the 5,000 majority the ruling coalition had expected from the Umno stronghold.

    BN’s Azahar polled 6,699 votes against PAS’s Normala, who took 2,992 votes from the 12 polling districts. A total of 9,833 voters, or 67 per cent of the 14,753 electorate, turned up to cast their ballots despite the rain.

    Wan Azizah wades into Sabah PKR row


    February 02, 2011

    Sabah PKR leaders have asked Dr Wan Azizah to take over the state leadership. — file pic
    KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 2 — PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail has been forced to intervene in the Sabah PKR revolt and will visit the state this weekend in an attempt to resolve the long-drawn crisis.

    PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution revealed to The Malaysian Insider that the party’s political bureau had agreed to empower Dr Wan Azizah to lead a peace mission to Sabah but the party president will have to tread lightly to avoid causing further upset to the “extremely delicate” situation.

    Dr Wan Azizah, he said, will form a committee comprising three top Sabah PKR leaders and personally lead the delegation to Sabah on February 6, after the Chinese New Year festivities.

    The decision, he added, did not mean that the party had rejected or accepted the resolutions signed by 18 of Sabah PKR’s 25 divisions on Tuesday, calling for the removal of newly-elected state chief Pajudin Noordin.

    “We received the resolutions but the political bureau felt that we should give the party president some time to attempt solving the problems in Sabah.

    “So Datuk Seri will form a special committee made up of three Sabah leaders and she will personally fly to Sabah to meet with all state leaders next (this) month,” he said when contacted earlier in the week.

    Saifuddin described the Sabah situation as “delicate”.
    Saifuddin added that the party had not made any decision yet on Pajudin’s position and will wait for the result of Wan Azizah’s visit.

    Eighteen Sabah PKR division leaders had submitted a resolution to the party a week ago, calling for the removal of Pajudin as state chief and urging Wan Azizah to take over as an interim leader.

    “We have not rejected their request per se. We took it into consideration and we came up with several options.

    “But the situation in Sabah is extremely delicate because we are dealing with a few factions so we need to discuss the matter thoroughly before making any decision,” said Saifuddin.

    The resolutions were signed by PKR’s Kota Belud, Sepanggar, Kota Kinabalu, Penampang, Putatan, Kimanis, Papar, Beaufort, Keningau, Pensiangan, Tenom, Libaran, Sandakan, Kinabatangan, Semporna, Kalabakan, Tawau and Silam divisions.

    These were handed over to PKR vice-president Fuziah Salleh, who later presented them during the party’s political bureau meeting on January 26.

    Pajudin has been accused of being a proxy to Ansari Abdullah, who leads a faction in Sabah PKR, against former state chief Ahmad Thamrin Jaini.

    The trained teacher was selected as Sabah PKR’s new chief in a surprising move earlier this month, replacing Thamrin, another faction leader and a known foe of Ansari’s, for the post.

    Pajudin’s appointment had come as a shock as he had not been among those touted as likely to be awarded the post and was also the first Sabah PKR chief who is not a division head.

    Pajudin, who has claimed to be impartial, was scheduled to reveal a state leadership line-up shortly after his appointment but efforts to unite the state’s divisional chiefs proved futile.

    The Malaysian Insider understands that many state divisional leaders are doubtful of Pajudin’s proclaimed impartiality and had decided to stay away from his meetings.

    PKR’s leadership has been accused of favouring Ansari.
    Many leaders were also unhappy with Pajudin’s appointment and have accused the party leadership of bias towards Ansari, who was selected to as PKR’s candidate in the Batu Sapi by-election last year.

    During the polls, Thamrin and his men had stayed away from participating in the party’s campaign.

    “Like I said, it is very delicate. Today, you may have the support of 16 or 17 state chiefs and then suddenly in the next few hours, you are left with 10 supporters,” said Saifuddin.

    “We cannot blindly make a decision before considering all factors thoroughly,”

    Sabah PKR was also hit by a spate of resignations earlier this month and the continued bickering among state party leaders is viewed as a likely hindrance to Pakatan Rakyat’s dreams of breaking Barisan Nasional’s hold in East Malaysia in the coming general election.

    Former vice-president Jeffrey Kitingan, and about 27 members from the state, had quit from PKR and formed a non-political organisation called the United Borneo Front (UBF).

    Following the Kitingan’s resignation, the state’s leadership tussle continued over who should helm Sabah PKR with factions rallying behind their chosen leaders Ansari and Thamrin.

    Khalid: No PAS-Umno unity even at Agong’s behest



    Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin (left) had hosted a dinner on Christmas eve for PAS and Umno’s top leaders. — Reuters picPETALING JAYA, Feb 2 — Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad has declared PAS will never join Umno in a “unity government”, even if the Islamist party were asked to do so by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong himself. “I guarantee that PAS will not join Umno-Barisan Nasional (BN) even if invited by the King,” he said at Taman Sri Manja during PKR’s first Jelajah Pemimpin 2011 roadshow last night. The PAS leader said co-operating with Umno was to work with those who ignored Islamic practice, and likened Umno to Muslims who patronised nightclubs to drink alcohol. He stressed that PAS would rather work with PKR and DAP in Pakatan Rakyat (PR) based on the Islamic principles of justice and truth rather than race alone. “We picked Pakatan Rakyat because Umno is rotten to the core,” he said. The Malaysian Insider reported in December that PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat met with Umno leaders at Istana Terengganu on Christmas Eve last year at the request of the Agong for “unity talks”.

    Khalid called Umno “rotten to the core.”Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Razak and deputy president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin were present at the private dinner, together with former prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. The meeting was seen as another attempt to revive the talks on political co-operation with Umno in the name of Malay-Muslim unity. However, sources told The Malaysian Insider that talks broke down over a dispute on non-Muslims’ right to use the word “Allah”, a dispute which remains before the Malaysian courts. The question of political co-operation with Umno became a major campaign issue in the 2009 PAS election after it was revealed that its leaders, including PAS deputy president Nasharuddin Mat Isa and Selangor chief Datuk Hasan Ali, met Abdullah and former Selangor mentri besar Dr Mohd Khir Toyo after Election 2008 to explore the possibility of forming a unity government. Leaders aligned to Nik Aziz then accused Nasharuddin of conspiring to take PAS out of PR, but the deputy president successfully defended his post in a three-cornered fight with Mohamad Sabu and Kelantan executive councillor Datuk Husam Musa.

    PAS now holds 23 parliamentary seats within the PR coalition and controls two states, Kelantan and Kedah. The other two PR-ruled states are Penang and Selangor. Sources familiar with the latest move to bring PAS into the BN government revealed that both PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang and Nasharuddin would be given prominent roles in Putrajaya if the party decides to abandon PR, but Nik Aziz continues to be the major obstacle in bringing the party closer to the ruling coalition. The unity talks first surfaced after BN suffered historic defeats in Election 2008, losing the five states and 82 parliament seats. However, it has managed to claw back under Najib, winning six of the 14 by-elections in the country since the 2008 general election. Perak also returned to BN rule in 2009. Umno’s Azahar Ibrahim also convincingly trounced PAS’s Normala Sudirman in the Tenang by-election last Sunday, winning a bigger majority of 3,707 against 2,492 won in 2008. But Azahar’s majority fell short of the targeted 5,000-vote majority as torrential rain cut voter turnout. Another by-election is slated for March 6 in Merlimau, where Umno is expected to face either PAS or PKR, further reducing the chance of a unity government in the near future. The next general election is not due before May 2013

    Abandon Taib now or be buried, SUPP told


    KUCHING – The Sarawak United People’s Party (SUPP) has been urged to save itself from the clutches of Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud and salvage whatever little dignity and pride it has left.

    “SUPP must not be blind to the writing on that wall. For too long, the party has an image of being a mere stooge of Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud. To continue supporting Taib now will seal the fate of SUPP. The party will be buried in the coming state election,” Movement For Change, Sarawak (MoCS) leader Francis Paul Siah said here today.

    He reckoned that the only honourable thing for SUPP to do now is to withdraw its support for Taib and join the majority of Sarawak Chinese to kick out Taib in the coming state election.

    “It is a fact that only some SUPP leaders and those with business ties with Taib and his family are the only Chinese left in Sarawak who are sill supporting Taib. The others have enough of Taib, a political leader who is now out of control and beyond salvation in amending his ways,” Siah said.

    The MoCS leader was commenting on the chief minister’s Chinese New Year message in which Taib told the Chinese not to bark at the government from outside.

    Taib said the community could come up with ideas of how to make the economy inclusive of Chinese interests by participation instead of merely criticizing from outside.

    “SUPP has been barking from inside for the past 40 years. But the party has been ineffective in looking after the interests of the Chinese. Only a few top SUPP leaders have benefitted and had become immensely wealthy after barking inside for 40 years.

    “So to the Chinese community, barking inside or outside does not make any difference. In fact, the Chinese should now start barking against Taib from four corners – inside, outside, upside and downside. This is MoCS Chinese New Year message to Sarawak Chinese,” Siah added.

    Government without a heart

    He added the majority of SUPP members and supporters have not benefitted at all from their four decades of participation in the government.

    Citing an example, he said he met a veteran SUPP Kuching branch leader who was still a hawker in a Kuching food court recently.

    “The poor guy is over 70-years-old and he still has to eke out a living as a hawker today. The sad part is that he was already feeble and sickly. He told me he joined SUPP when he was in his early 20’s and was still a loyal party member today”, said Siah.

    “This is a classic example of Taib’s politics of development and SUPP’s blind and cowardly backing for a corrupt chief minister and an uncaring government.

    “Taib Mahmud’s administration is a government without a heart. A government with a heart with look after the people first, not looking after the personal interests of its leaders,” he said.

    “On this Lunar New Year, MoCS’s foremost wish is to be able to come up with the formula of a ‘pesticide’ which will see to the eradication of the ‘termite colony’ in Sarawak,” added Siah.

    Urban Chinese voters worry me, says Taib


    KUCHING: The urban Chinese voter who is inclined to pick “someone who will bark at the government” is worrying Sarawak Chief Minister Taib Mahmud.

    He said the opposition was always telling the Chinese community to vote for its candidates so that they could criticise the government.

    “But voting the opposition means no government support… the areas lost by the Barisan Nasional-led government may not get anything, like in Taiwan or America.

    “That’s the rule of the game. I must admit to being a bit worried with the attitude of urban voters to vote for someone to bark at the government.

    “But without sounding boastful, BN will be able to form the next government probably with a two-third majority,” said Taib, who is also state BN chairman.

    Taib was reminding the Chinese community of their responsibility to elect good leaders in the coming state election in his Chinese New Year message.

    He said by chosing to elect an opposition candidate, the community was depriving the best Chinese leaders from sharing their experience with those of the Malays, Iban, Bidayuh and other communities.

    More importantly, he said, the community would deprive the government of getting input if there was no effective Chinese representation in the government.

    “As I started being multi-racial, I have also to think for the Chinese too. But I am helpless…there is nothing I can do to change the Chinese mindset towards the government. I cannot speak Chinese.

    “The Chinese community must come up with ideas on how to make the economy inclusive of Chinese interests. They should participate instead of merely criticising from outside.

    “Generally the government does not adjust its targets (programmes to develop the country) easily. So if you talk by shouting, you don’t get results,” he said.

    He added that the people must learn to change their mindset to become more conscious about the interest of other races.

    PENJAWAT AWAM PRO-PEMBANGKANG...


    Kudos to Kedah state government

    It is most heartening to note that for the first time in history the state budget has become positive. The Pakatan-led government under the humble and honest leadership of the Menteri Besar from PAS has proven its ability to rule Kedah state in a most responsible manner.

    We beseech God to shower the virtue and strength to the present state leadership so that the positive growth will continue and the people of Kedah will get better and better service from the government.

    The change in the state government in 2008 election, in no uncertain terms has brought to light the poor and irresponsible leadership the UMNO-led BN government had done to the state economy.

    The people of Kedah should give greater support to PR in the forthcoming general elections, with greater number of seats in the state assembly so that Kedah will see a boom in its economy.

    It is the change in voters' support that has brought this good thing to Kedah. UMNO-BN by right should appreciate this goodness and learn how to rule virtuously and honestly, so that the peoples money is used to develop the state and its people.

    The people in Kedah should not be hoodwinked by misinformation and vote buying goodies and empty promises from a proven corrupt BN.

    Let us all help Malaysia, save Malaysia from these political crooks who use money and power to buy votes and remain in power to loot the nation's wealth.

    Let us unite as one human race and uphold justice and fairness, and embrace the future with honest leaders.


    Perbandingan Penjualan Arak di Selangor:UMNO vs Pakatan Rakyat

    Di bawah adalah kesah benar yang saya ambil dari Facebook datang dari seorang ahli Facebook bernama Azamin Abidin.

    Beliau membuat perbandingan penjualan arak di tempat beliau tinggal, Bangi, sebelum dan selepas Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat mengambil alih tampuk pemerintahan.

    Ketahui saudara sekelian UMNO tidak pernah mahu membasmi arak. Cuma sekarang buat isu besar sebab nak fitnah kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat. Itu aje.

    Macamana UMNO nak tutup kilang arak. Kilang Guiness Anchor di Sungai Way tu, bekas Presiden UMNO yang rasmi.

    Selamat Membaca.
    Azamin Abidin
    masa berjanji... segala halangan nak tutuk kilang arak tu tak nampak.. sekarang ni nak tutuk ada benda yg kerajaan selangor tiada kuasa... mungkin bila PR poerintah malaysia baru boleh settle benda ni... tapi ada juga usaha usaha utk atasi...... bukan macam kerajaan selangor dulu... dan pasai apa dulu UMNO tak nak tutup???

    sapa kata dulu shah alam dan bangi tak boleh jual arak??? dulu lagi bebas 7-11 jual arak... saya dulu duduk section 8 shah alam... dekat dgn yg kes 7-11 heboh tu.. Penduduk sec 8 dah mintak 7-11 tak jual arak sejak ianya mula dibuka tahun 2003-4 lagi.. aduan kat MBSA, kat ADuN tapi di bo layan... mai PR perintAH BARU ADA TINDAKAN... dan sekarang 7-11 di kawasan org IOslam dah tak boleh jual arak dah... 7-11 dgn sukarela buat after dialog dgn kerajaan selangor sekarang.. jangan berbohong di sini en. pasarmalam... ko ni duduk shah alam ke???


    Dr Mahathir sengaja salah tafsir + Happy Chinese New Year

    PETALING J

    PETALING JAYA: Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad sengaja menyalah tafsir kenyataan Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat berhubung kenyataan menteri besar Kelantan itu bahawa orang Melayu di Malaysia menolak Islam lebih teruk dari Menteri Mentor Singapura, Lee Kuan Yew.

    Ketua Pemuda PAS, Nasruddin Hassan Tantawi berkata, mantan perdana menteri Malaysia itu juga sengaja membuat tidak faham dengan kenyataan Nik Aziz.

    “Apa yang dimaksudkan oleh Nik Aziz yang juga Mursyidul Am PAS itu sengaja disalah tafsir oleh Dr Mahathir,” kata Ketua Pemuda PAS, Nasruddin Hassan.

    Dr Mahathir juga menuduh Nik Aziz telah menyebabkan umat Islam di Malaysia berpecah tiga.

    Dalam blognya chedet.cocc, beliau mendakwa Nik Aziz berkata, “Melayu (di Malaysia) tolak Islam lebih teruk daripada Kuan Yew”.

    Dr Mahathir menulis, hasil daripada sokongan Nik Aziz orang Melayu sekali lagi berpecah tiga. Tidak cukup dengan ini Nik Aziz sanggup bekerja keras dengan DAP untuk menubuh Pakatan Rakyat.

    Bagaimanapun, Ketika dihubungi FMT hari ini Nasruddin mendakwa Dr Mahathir gagal memahami maksud sebenar Nik Aziz.

    “Maksud sebenar Nik Aziz ialah Kuan Yew lebih baik dari sesetengah orang Melayu yang mendakwa mereka beragama Islam tetapi menolak Islam.

    “Kenyataan itu bukan bermakna orang bukan Melayu lebih baik dari orang Islam tetapi dari perpektif Kuan Yew seorang yang bukan beragama Islam,” katanya.

    Nasruddin bagaimanapun, mengakui bahawa beliau tidak setuju dengan kenyataan Menteri Mentor Singapura tu dan mendakwa pemikiran Kuan Yew itu sudah ketinggalan zaman.

    Mengenai dakwaan Kuan Yew bahawa, umat Islam telah berpecah tiga, Nasruddin menjelaskan, “umat Islam tidak berpecah, tetapi mereka menganuti ideologi yang berbeza.”

    “Mereka tetap orang Islam, cuma wujud perbezaan ideologi di kalangan mereka sehingga orang nampak orang Islam berpecah.”





    Filed under: Alternatives Tagged: Anak Sarawak Bangsa Malaysia, Save Sarawak

    Sebelum ketuk kepala TG.Nik Aziz dan Anwar mai kita sepak juboq Mahathir dulu.....

    Dr Mahathir Mohamad berkata orang Melayu negara ini boleh disatukan jika dapat ketuk kepala Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat dan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim atas alasan masalah itu berpunca daripada kedua-dua pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat tersebut.

    Cara mudah, ketuk kepala Nik Aziz dan Anwar kerana penyakit itu semua datang daripada mereka, kata beliau menjawab satu soalan bagaimana untuk menyatupadukan orang Melayu yang menurutnya sudah berpecah tiga.

    Tumpang Sekole(TS) - Alahai macamlah semasa Mahathir berkuasa dulu orang Melayu tak pernah berpecah? Perpecahan Melayu UMNO dengan Melayu PAS dah lama dah sebelum Che Det jadi PM lagi. Melayu UMNO berpecah kepada team A dan team B, ini angkara sapa? Bukankah Mahathir punya kerja?

    Dalam kebanyakan ucapannya sejak Mac 2008, Dr Mahathir mendakwa orang Melayu sudah berpecah kepada tiga dan kuasa politik semakin mengecil dan tidak menolak kemungkinan akan menjadi macam orang Melayu Singapura. Beliau juga menyifatkan usaha menyatupadukan orang-orang Melayu itu menemui jalan buntu kerana tidak adanya keinginan daripada kedua-dua pemimpin berkenaan, Mursyidul Am PAS dan Ketua Umum Pakatan Rakyat untuk ke arah itu.

    TS - Sejak bilakah Ketua Umum Pakatan Rakyat dijemput untuk berbincang pasal perpaduan Melayu? Orang Melayu bukan UMNO dah tahu cara permainan pemimpin2 UMNO ini, bila dalam keadaan terdesak mereka tadah tangan minta bersatu tapi bila dah bersatu, lain pula ceritanya. Kalau tidak tak kan PAS diterajang keluar BN dahulu. Kalau nak cakap fasal Melayu bersatu, UMNO sepatutnya ajak semua parti yang ada ahli2 orang Melayu bersatu bukan hanya jemput PAS saja!!

    Niat mereka hanya untuk mendapa! t tempat . Anwar dengan dasarnya untuk sampai ke Putrajaya dan Nik Aziz adalah seorang opportunist. Tidak ada niat mereka ini untuk berkhidmat untuk agama, bangsa dan negara, itu yang susah hendak berbaik dengan mereka, katanya dipetik Bernama.

    TS
    - Sapa yang tak ada cita2 nak berkuasa. UMNO sendiri juga 'opportunist' dalam menentukan cita2nya bagi mempertahankan Putrajaya dengan apa seakali pun. Tengok saja tindak tanduknya kini,UMNO guna semua jentera kerajaan yang ada termasuk SPR,mahkamah,media massa,polis dan kaki tangan kerajaan bagi memenuhi cita2 mereka.

    Dr Mahathir berkata dalam keadaan kepercayaan kepada Umno juga goyah, orang Melayu kini diletakkan dalam keadaan serba-salah untuk memilih parti yang boleh dipercayai, justeru menyifatkan kaum Melayu kini dalam Malay Dilemma 2.

    TS - Macam mana orang Melayu nak percaya kepada UMNO, kerana dalam UMNO sendiri menggalakkan amalan rasuah,salah guna kuasa dan fenomena Melayu menipu Melayu? Sepatutnya Mahathir nasihat UMNO supaya jangan jadi korup,bersikap sombong dan bongkak. Mahathir juga patut nasihat agar berhati-hati bila menggunakan agensi penasihat Yahudi-APCO dalam soal urusan tadbiran negara. Mahathir patut nasihat Najib tu berdebat dengan Anwar pasal ekonomi. Mahathir juga sepatut tanya Najib, siapa PM sebenarnya Najib atau Rosmah Mansor?

    Beliau berkata demikian pada wacana Kaum Melayu dan Masa Depan anjuran Majlis Bekas Wakil Rakyat Malaysia (Mubarak) Wilayah Persekutuan di sini hari ini.

    source:malaysia insider.

    Sudahlah Mahathir ooi...apa yang hang buat dulu, hang dah lupa, berehatlah dan banyakkan amalan solih....

    cheers.

    Chinese New Year when I was a kid

    chinese new year decorations 120207

    Sim Kwang Yang

    The happiest time of my life was spent in awaiting the arrival of the Chinese New Year.

    I grew up in Kuching not long after Second World War. Malaysia had just been formed in 1963. It was a time of universal poverty, and Kuching was a two-horse town. Nobody was really rich.

    The people who owned cars usually drove British models like Vauxhall and Morris Minor, and they were few and far in between. Everybody else went about their business on foot or on bicycle.

    But Chinese New Year was the biggest festival of the year, and all Chinese celebrated the occasion with all they had. The arrival of the New Year was keenly awaited by every child.

    There were good reasons for this. The New Year was that special time when the children got to eat a mountain of rich food and gulp down bottles of sweet, aerated soft drinks. These treats were usually denied to young children on other days.

    Long before the appearance of Coca-Cola, children were crazy about Green Spot, a festively coloured, orange-flavoured soft drink. At every Chinese New Year, there would always be a supply of this drink in every household and we children would gorge ourselves silly.

    The Chinese New Year was also that rare occasion when we children could eat as much meat as we liked, at a time when eating meat was not common at all. There would invariably be a duck, a chicken, and a slab of pork, often offered to an ancestor first, before being consumed by the living humans. We had not seen so much meat at the table for the rest of the entire year put together.

    Chinese goodiess

    chinese new year 310108 firecracker

    There wou! ld alway s be the typical Chinese New Year goodies displayed for guests and visitors. The mandarin oranges were a must, to be presented in pairs to all visitors, on their arrival in the house. Even in those poverty-stricken days, adults would always reserve a small ang pow or two for children. The small gift of a ringgit or two was phenomenal wealth for the young children, to be spent on petty gambling.

    I remember living in what is now the Kuching Municipal Council (KMC) low-cost housing, known as the Seven Storey Flats at Jalan Ban Hock, in the middle of Kuching. It was the first decent housing that my poor family could afford for the first time in our lives. There, I spent my happiest Chinese New Years with my small growing family.

    The event that interested me the most, and gave me the greatest pleasure, was lighting fire-crackers together with a bunch of neighbourhood kids. Being poor, we could afford only to light one fire-cracker at a time so as to make our meagre stock last. For a period of a week or so, all our pocket money would go up in puffs of smoke.

    The lion dance troupes brought with them the typical banging and clanging of the sounds of the New Year. The troupes went visiting each house in turn, and each family would give them a small ang pow.

    In recent years, I have watched with sadness in my heart as these lion dance troupes have decreased in number, while the Chinese kids participating in the lion dance have been dwindling too.

    chinese new year 310108 lion

    During those growing years of mine, there was an undeniable community spirit among my neighbours and friends. People gave assistance to one another in preparing for the festival, and the neighbourhood often shared the expense of making cakes. Unfortunately, such community spirit has mostly vanished in recent years.

    Hard work, thrift and education

    Looking back to those old days, I am happy that Kuching and Sarawak have come a long way. Those days of dire need and suffering are mostly gone now, as nowadays most urban Chinese enjoy a middle-class living standard.

    I have seen Kuching city grow many times in size over the past half century. Most people have achieved upward social mobility in the course of the last 50 years. The secret to their success has been the tried-and-tested Chinese triumvirate of values: hard work, thrift and education.

    I have seen many lives being changed for the better over the course of time, by hardworking families, dedicated to their education of their young. The kind of poverty that I witnessed during those early days among the urban Chinese is largely no more.

    As they sit down to their family reunion dinner on Feb 2, or Chinese New Years Eve, the Chinese people of Malaysia will have a lot to celebrate. They are one of the most successful ethnic communities, and they have come far, making a life for themselves.

    Let us all share their joy by wishing everyone Happy Chinese New Year.

    SIM KWANG YANG can be reached at sky8hornbill@gmail.com. All comments are welcomed.


    Filed under: Alternatives Tagged: Anak Sarawak Bangsa Malaysia, Sarawak, Save Sarawak, Sim Kwang Yang, Sky

    Malaysia in the Era of Globalization #51

    Chapter Six: Malaysia: Assets and Liabilities
    Enhancing Special Privileges
    To enhance the efficacy of special privileges I would first focus on the bottom 50 percent (better still, bottom 25) of Bumiputras. I agree with Grameen Banks Muhammad Yunus who feels that development should be defined to mean positive changes in the economic status of the bottom half of the population. Consequently I would cut off the top quartile Bumiputras (or those with certain net worth or income) from special privileges. Such a modification would effectively target special privileges on truly needy Bumiputras. At the same time it would reduce the resentment felt by non-Bumiputras. Disqualifying ministers, top leaders, royal families, and affluent Bumiputras would also have the additional salutary effect of forcing them to be self-reliant.
    This means testing at the gross level would not entail much administrative costs or erecting another huge bureaucracy. A simple statuary declaration under sever penalty of perjury and intent to defraud the government would deterrent enough. For added weight, have those applying for benefits of special privileges submit their or their parents previous years tax returns.
    For the royal class, I would eliminate many of their present tax-free privileges. Make them pay their share of income, property, road and other taxes. If Britains Queen Elizabeth has to pay income tax, Malaysian sultans should also do likewise. The aggregate impact of such measures on the Treasury would be minuscule, but the psychological benefits to members of the royalty would be immense. For one, they would share in the pain suffered by ordinary citizens, always a salutary experience. For another, if they had to pay their share of taxes on their luxurious toys, that would likely rein in their obscenely flamboyant lifestyles. M! alaysia should not have to put up with such nonsense as when the Sultan of Kelantan drove off with his impounded luxury sports car without paying the necessary road tax.
    Lastly, seeing families of leaders, royalty, and aristocrats being kicked off the dole would appease immensely the social sensibility and sense of justice of ordinary Malaysians. At the very least that would eliminate the current hypocrisy where many of these leaders would with nauseating frequency exhort the masses to be berdikari (self reliant) while they and their families are the first to hog the public trough. I am astounded at how many members of the immediate families of ministers are getting government scholarships, aids, subsidies, or otherwise dependent on public dole. They have no shame. If they cannot be independent on their ministerial income, then they have no right to lecture the masses on being berdikari.
    The government can still effectively help Bumiputras without special privileges. If it were to announce a program to help rural dwellers and members of the civil service, police, and military, the beneficiaries would in all likelihood be predominantly Bumiputras. We would have achieved the same goal yet such a program would not reek of racism. Additionally, doing so would also encourage non-Bumiputras to join the police and armed services so as to benefit from these privileges.
    Current special privileges are ineffective because they lump all Bumpiputras together. As Muhammad Yunus observes, Like good old Gresham Law, it is wise to remember in the world of development, if one mixes the poor and the non poor within a program, the non poor will always push out the poor, and the less poor will drive out the more poor, and this may continue ad infinitum unless one takes protective measures right at the beginning.
    Gresham Law is an observation in economics where if two coins are of equal value officially but unequal in intrinsic! value, then the one with the lesser intrinsic value will remain in circulation while the more valuable one will be hoarded. Or more succinctly stated, bad money drives good money out.
    More generally, this means inferior practices will eventually displace superior ones. This is happening to special privileges. Initially it was meant to help Malays who were deserving of help, now the program helps those who already have it, the well-to-do Malays pushing out their poor brethrens, as predicted by Gresham Law.
    Gresham Law is a modern version of the biblical wisdom, For everyone who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what little he has will be taken away from him. (Matthew 25:29) In the west, the cowboys have it more succinctly, Dem dat has, gits!
    I would also radically change the present special privileges programs in the following manner. First I would total up all the costs of all the programs for the preceding ten years. This would include not only the direct expenditures in terms of scholarships, grants, aids, etc., but also the indirect costs (loss of import Approved Permit revenuess, subsidies on various state corporations as well as the added costs of having public contracts reserved for Bumiputras). Included also would be the costs of bailing out the Tajuddin Ramlis and Halim Saads (Malay corporate figures). Then I would adjust the nominal total to the 2001 ringgit. Obviously a 1991 ringgit was worth considerably more than a 2001 one. I would not be surprised to find the total to be truly staggering if the accountants were competent enough to factor in all the costs.
    Assume that figure to be RM X billion. Next I would calculate the rate of inflation and population growth for the past decade and extrapolate the same rates for the next decade. This would roughly be 4 and 3 percent respectively per annum. Now factor the same rates for the next decade an! d apply them to X. That figure would now be about RM 2X billion, according to my rough calculation (X growing at a compounded rate of 7 percent per annum). This is the amount that we would be spending in the next decade, assuming the same rate of inflation and population growth.
    Now here is the radical part of my plan. Instead of using the money to create phony Bumiputra businessmen and entrepreneurs or bailing out the likes of Bank Bumiputra, I would spend them on rural schools, kampongs, and poor Bumiputras (the bottom half). I would rebuild rural schools so that they would be air-conditioned and have first class libraries, laboratories, and computers. I would provide the children with nutritious breakfasts and lunches. Like Tun Razak in the 1970s, I would use the money to bring in by the planeloads, competent science, mathematics, and English teachers from abroad to teach in these rural schools.
    I would give zero or even negative interest rate loans for rural people to improve their dwellings where they could have indoor plumbing and septic tanks. I prefer such loans to outright grants. One, that would teach citizens on the handling of credit. Two, grants tend to foster dependency. With loans the recipients are not made to feel or treated as wards of the state. There is as element of self-dignity there. Use negative interest loans to start a massive rural development program similar to that which General Park did in South Korea. I would use the funds to provide extensive rural electrification program comparable to the Tennessee Valley Authority, with subsidized utilities for the villagers.
    I would have Proton (the national car company) start a national tractor project to build cheap reliable machines Malaysian farmers could afford, again using negative interest rate loans to help them buy those machines. I would also have the same loan programs for rural dwellers to start their own businesses. For example, fishmongers an! d fried banana sellers should have subsidized loans so they could buy their ingredients in bulk and at a discount. But instead of giving them the money directly, I would negotiate on their behalf the best deals from the vendors. I would do the same for the Sunday market hawkers to buy pushcarts and small trucks to haul their wares. I would do this for other merchants so they could expand their businesses and inventories.
    I would also set aside special funds for students now taking vocational studies like auto mechanic and cosmetology to start their own enterprises. Before doing that I would supplement their training by giving elementary business lessons. I would suggest to Petronas that its petroleum station franchises be given only to trained auto mechanics. Such a program would also expand the capabilities and thus revenue stream of many Petronas stations to include the more lucrative repair business. With such a program more Malays would be enticed to take up vocational training.
    What I would definitely not do is lend them money for their childrens wedding or trips to Mecca. These subsidized loans must be for productive purposes, that is, for income-producing activities. Car loans would only for those who intend to purchase their own taxis or use the vehicles for commercial purposes. With such a scheme, all Malay taxi and truck drivers would own their vehicle.
    As an incentive to keep their children in school and to pay attention to their education, I would pay rural and poor parents as well as their children for attending schools. This idea was mooted by the Nobel laureate in Economics Gary Becker, an expert on human capital, and has been successfully tried in Latin America. I would go further and reward students (and their parents) who had perfect attendance or scored above the 90th percentile in national examinations.
    At the apex, I will automatically award any Malay who gets accepted to top univ! ersities , with no bonds whatsoever reward for their excellence. What I would not do is spent the money on buying company shares in trust for Bumiputras or bailing out Bumiputra corporations. Indeed I would sell MAS, Pernas, Petronas and other Nases and use the proceeds in the manner described earlier.
    At the end of the decade in 2010, I would compare the results of my program to what we have today. I am certain that Malaysia would be much further ahead. So would Malays.
    There is an art in helping people. Properly done we help them achieve their maximal potential; poorly executed and they become hopelessly dependent. Increasingly, special privileges are turning Bumiputras into hopeless dependents of the state.
    In a globalized world, Bumiputras will not be competing against non-Bumiputras in the protected sphere of Malaysia, rather all Malaysians will be challenged against the rest of the world. We should go beyond seeing special privileges in terms of Bumiputra/non-Bumiputra dynamics. Otherwise the policy will serve only as a barnacle not only on the country but also more specifically, on Bumiputras.
    The more important goal is to make all Malaysians, Bumiputras especially, competitive. In the next chapter I will amplify on the specifics of this issue.
    Next: Chapter 7: Enhancing Human Capital

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...