Exposing The $125B Indonesian Money Laundering Scam with $18B Commission involving Malaysian Politicos !

EXPOSED : COMMISSION OF RM18 BILLION OUT OF RM125 BILLION BELONGS TO WHOM?

Benarkah ada 3 saiz tengkolok dalam setiap nilai Ringgit Malaysia?

Komisen RM18billion dari RM125billion milik siapa?

1. Surat perjanjian 4-6-2008 antara Mr E dengan Dato MS dan Mr MA

2. Perjanjian xxx duit baru dan duit lama Malaysia

3. Surat dari xxx bertarikh 30-5-2008 kepada Dato MT kepada Dato MN tentang ketibaan penghantaran duit pada 18-6-2009

4. Surat kepada Dato Seri A dari Mr E tentang penghantara pertama RM2 billion ke Bank xxx di Shah Alam atas nama Ixxx AxxxC xxx SB

5. Surat daripada Dato MT kepada Mr BS bertarikh 7-7-2008 tentang penghantaran duit tersebut boleh dihantar pada bila-bila masa saja

Dalam surat perjanjian tu tulis Dato MS dan Mr A dapat 15% dari RM125billion.

Banyak tu….

1. Kenapa Dato MS dan Mr MA mewakili Dato Seri A dapat RM18billion? Jeng…jeng…jeng

2. Dato Seri A dapat berapa billion?

3. Semua dokumen sudah ada ditangan! He he

Sebelum nasib aku jadi macam Altantuya nanti lebih baik aku letak sikit info kat dalam rumah aku yang takder geran ini sebab ianya melibatkan bekas pemimpin tertinggi di Malaysia Tapi….

Perlukah didedahkan skandal terbesar di Malaysia ini untuk tatapan rakyat Malaysia?

Apa yang perlu anda lakukan? Sila cari maklumat dibawah ini kalau nak tau lebih lanjut tentang skandal diatas.

1. Sebelum merdeka, negara kita pakai duit apa?
2. Bagaimana duit Malaysia di cetak pada masa tersebut?

Even More Here

Open Letter to MB Tan Sri Khalid

To the Menteri Besar of Selangor Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim,

On behalf of many friends who are troubled by the on going in Selangor we wish to state clearly we are in support of you and your action against the appointment of an unsuitable person as State Secretary and knowing the difficulties in handling the spoilt and arrogant Royal Household.

We would like to clear the misconception claimed by the Sultan of Selangors private secretary accusing you for inciting the Malays to hate the Royalty. We the people (all Malaysians) do not hate but are frustrated and fed-up with the Royalties in Malaysia as a whole since the days of Mahathir era. In 1993 Mahathir should have wipe off the Royalties for good. Since this was not done the Royalties have again acted arrogant, thieves and murderers. Todays trouble would not have happened if the Royalties did not act selfishly.

Everyone know that UMNO especially Najib is desperate to win back Selangor by all means. So there is a need of a person like Khusrin to create havoc in Selangor to grab back the state and give to UMNO.

We Malaysians have not forgotten the working of the State Secretary of Perak and the Sultan of Perak in the take over of Perak with bribes and projects.

We also have not forgotten the Great Tok Guru Nik Aziz who had to endure the wrath of ex-Sultan of Kelantan Ismail Petra, Mahathir, Daim, Pak Lah, Khairy, Najib and Rosmah since 1990. The ex-Sultan of Kelantan was spiteful at all times toward Tok Guru and had accumulated wealth that was meant for the Kelantanese. Today the ex-Sultan of Kelantan cannot even use all his wealth to gain him back his health.

To fight the Royalties one must be perseverance and patience. Most time one can only grind own teeth and cry in private. To have the virtue similar to the Great Tok Guru is difficult to follow but one must if one were to ! handle t he spoilt Royalties.

Today Tok Guru has earned our respect and support. I believe that given in a situation where the Agong, Sultan, Prime Minister and Tok Guru are present, the people will go down their knees and kiss the latter feet (Tok Guru Nik Aziz) with pride and respect and ignore the rest.

So be a man and seek the advice and guidance from the Great Tok Guru Nik Aziz and let karma take care of the Royalties.

From 168 Selangorians
See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Selangor - A constitutional crisis is in the cards...

Are we going to see a Barisan Nasional takeover of Selangor a la Perak? Many Pakatan Rakyat (PR) lawmakers think so following the appointment of Mohd Khusrin Munawi as state secretary. Ousted Perak Mentri Besar Nizar Jamaluddin has gone as far as to advise the Selangor government to do all that is "humanly possible" to prevent Khusrin from taking on this position.
The state secretary is a strategic post. By many accounts, hes the second most powerful official in the state. Yet, in some states (those that were the Federated Malay states of Selangor, Pahang, Negri Sembilan and Perak), he is not appointed by the state government but by the federal government via the Public Services Commission.
This is not a problem when the federal and state governments are formed by the same party. But thats not the case in Selangor and it looks like a constitutional crisis is in the cards. The state government refuses to accept the appointment but the federal government refuses to back down. To further complicate things, the royalty is also embroiled in this matter after the federal government got the sultan of Selangor to agree to the appointment.
Certain PR leaders like DAPs Lim Kit Siang are saying that choosing a candidate the state government so strenuously objects to is a violation of the spirit, if not the letter, of the state constitution. Lim argues that although there is no mention in the state constitution on the role of the mentri besar in the appointment of the state secretary, the chief secretary to the (federal) government should take great care to appoint someone whom the state government could work with.
"The chief secretary, who has been delegated the constitutional task to make the appointment, should be mindful of the different political coalitions running the federal and Selangor state governments and the importance of ensuring an appointee who could work ! as a bri dge-builder or at least not seen as inimical to the Selangor state government interests vis--vis the federal government," Lim said. Others, like DAPs Lau Weng San and Karpal Singh are saying there is also a legal basis for rejecting Khusrin. Lau argues that the Selangor palaces confirmation has no "constitutional basis" as the state secretary was answerable to the mentri besar and not the sultan.
Karpal is focusing on the swearing-in ceremony tomorrow before the sultan. He says this is unlawful because the state constitution dictates that the oath of office has to be done in front of the mentri besar, not the sultan. "It could lead into a constitutional crisis because it is not in line with the state constitution ... but I hope this does not happen, that is why the sultan must be extra careful before going through with this," Karpal said, adding cautiously that the "act" of the sultan can be taken up in a court of law.
Selangor Mentri Besar Khalid Ibrahim does not mince his words in accusing the chief secretary to the government of trying to sabotage the state with the appointment of Khusrin. Khalid has indicated that he has the option of rejecting Khusrin by refusing to allow him to take the oath of secrecy. So, although technically, Khusrin might be state secretary in name, in practice he would not be allowed to attend state exco meetings or be privy to state secrets.
One way to resolve this situation is for the federal government to put forth a new candidate that the state government finds acceptable. Thats not likely to happen though. Whats likely to happen is a constitutional crisis, which has to be settled in court.
It might be messy, it probably will be long and drawn out, and it certainly has its risks. As constitutional law expert Aziz Bari has noted, court rulings since the 2008 general election have shown a clear pattern of favouring the government. However, there doesnt seem to be any other way out of it. Besides, as Aziz has also noted, "The law, as it stands, favours MB Khalid a! nd the S elangor Pakatan administration." - Oon Yeoh
source:theSun
cheers.
Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

"Royals will be completely exterminated by BN in less than a decade from now"

PKR blames Umno for erosion of royal powers

By Adib Zalkapli

January 04, 2011

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 4 — PKR blamed Umno today for the erosion of royal powers and sought to restore them to the pre-1993 period when the functions of the monarchy in administration were restricted.

PKR information chief Dr Muhammad Nur Manuty claimed that the two constitutional amendments in 1983 and 1993 to reduce the functions of the Sultans were made without the approval of the Conference of Malay Rulers.

In expressing its support for the move by the Selangor government to restore the state Ruler’s power to appoint senior civil servants, Muhammad Nur said the action was consistent with Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) common policy framework launched in late 2009.

“Keadilan is confident that the move to restore the power of appointing the three senior executive officers to the Sultan and mentri besar is a significant move to strengthen the institution of the constitutional monarchy, in line with the Pakatan Rakyat’s common policy framework,” he said at a press conference here.

The country’s richest state has been in turmoil for the past week since the Chief Secretary to the Government named Datuk Mohd Khusrin Munawi to replace outgoing State Secretary Datuk Ramli Mahmud, whose last day of office was on Friday.

The PR state government has rejected Mohd Khusrin’s appointment and insists it has the right to name its own person for the job.

Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim announced yesterday that Selangor will hold an emergency sitting of the state legislative assembly to change the state constitution to return to the mentri besar and Sultan the power to appoint the state secretary, state finance officer and state legal adviser.

Khalid also claimed that the Sultan was of the view that he (the Sultan) had no power to accept or reject candidates recommended by the Public Service Commission (PSC) for executive posts.

“The reality is, the power of appointing the senior officers was abolished by Umno in constitutional amendments conducted forcefully in 1983 and 1993 despite objection by the Conference of Rulers,” said Muhammad Nur today.

He claimed that Umno has been exploiting the Malay Rulers for its own political interest.

“For the sake of holding on to power they resorted to sloganeering, from ‘1 Malaysia’, ‘Malay Supremacy’ to the ‘Sovereignty of the Rulers’,” said Muhammad Nur.

“To make it worse, Umno was even willing to tarnish and to exploit any state institution,” he added.

GREAT RECIPE FOR HYPOCRISY The Association of MUSLIM BETTER MUNAFIK Lawyers

The year that was, 2010, would, rather should, be etched in our collective memory as a year of scams has exposed the loot of the nation in full public view by some obvious villains in corrupt politicians, collusive bureaucrats and greedy companies. However, the role played by the legal community has gone largely unnoticed. Evidence suggests that lawyers across the board in the law ministry, in Mallaysia's largest law firms and even those who work within telecom companies also let the nation down by failing in their duty to report and perhaps even stop the scam.

Let the facts speak for themselves.So why did the

so the begining of the persecution of the malaysin opposition leader bythe beautifully beastifull rosamah the director of sodomy2

Now that Anwar Ibrahims trial has kicked off maybe it is time to recap on what happened about a year ago with regards to the allegation that Anwar had buggered Saiful Bukhari Azlan. Malaysia Today previously published Dr Osmans medical report and the Statutory Declaration that followed it and the police subsequently raided my house and called me in for interrogation wanting to know how I managed to get my hands on these documents.

NO HOLDS BARRED

SEE THE VIDEOS HERE

1. Dokt or Pusrawi Muncul Semula & Akui Akuan Bersumpah Miliknya

2. Dr Osman pertahan keputusan pemeriksaan perubatan Saiful

3. Cops grill Raja Petra over docs SD

This trial is a bald-faced attempt to permanently remove an opposition leader from Malaysian politics, said Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. The government is trying to manipulate the justice system for political purposes.alse charges vs evil umno the judge Augustinkosong,prosecuting Safianballsucker defence team head the taxidriver streetwise kid

Statement from Human Rights Watch : Government Pre-Trial Maneuvers Show Political Motivations

The Malaysian government should immediately drop politically motivated criminal charges against opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, Human Rights Watch said today.

On July 15, 2009, the Kuala Lumpur High Court will hear Anwars application to strike out a sodomy charge against him, and an ongoing defense request for evidence it says is crucial to properly prepare for trial. A truth nobody will ever admit why mahatir incarcerated Anwar Does justice matter after 11 years why lingamgate was buried?

This is the second time Anwar has been charged with sodomy. He spent six years in prison before his previous conviction for sodomy was overturned in 2004.EFFECTIVELY ELIMINATING MISCONDUCT AMONG ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Gani Patail Witness what happened to former Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim by Police Chief. CHARGE him for not reporting

Human Rights Watch said the current charge appears politically motivated and lacks credibility.

The government has failed to disclose key evidence to the defense, hastily sought to pass a DNA statute that aids the prosecution, and put Anwar at a disadvantage by unnecessarily moving the trial to the high court. In addition, the government allowed the attorney general, who is under investigation for misconduct in Anwars previous trial, to be in! volved i n the current case.will the untouchable beautifully beastifull rosamah sent Anwar Ibrahim to jail?

the beautifully beastifull rosamah the sayfoolstory

the beautifully beastifull rosamah the sayfoolstory

Political agenda behind Rosmah videos

Wong Pheak Zern | Jun 26, 09 4:53pm

socalled LEadERS and UMNO/BN will be kicked out in the next General Election.

The educated masses are not fools.Everything is known clearly.There are some who despite knowing the overt faults of the regime that calls itself the Government,still lobby in its support because their own conscience is tainted.The regime has allowed corruption to be ingrained into the core of the Government operations.It would need the sacking of at least 30% of the Government sector before any remedial measures can be successfully instituited.The good public of this nation must fight on!

Well, Kennys analysis holds out the hope that Anwar may be able to defend the sodomy charges successfully.
I must admit I have no such optimism!
yes, we must battle for justice but when the investigative, prosecution and judiciary are stacked for the UMNOputras, I wonder what an ordinary rakyat can do?
I will bide my time and come the next general elections , hopefully the collective vote will show the UMNOputras the door!

All law abiding citizens must stand up and be counted. This is a fight where the citizens must win in order that we may live in peace and not in fear!

If you think this is just Anwars problem, then, think again because if the justice system in Malaysia is damaged beyond repair, then, all Malaysians could be confronted with situations like Kugan, Anwar a! nd a who le host of other abusive and life threatening occasions experienced by the less fortunate.

Once the justice system is irreparably damaged, then, the darker side of jealousy or opportunists will creep beyond the less fortunate onto other innocent parties like you and me. This will be because if the institutions of the nation are able to manipulate our countrys democratic rights without any consequences, then, our enemies or disenchanted acquaintances will be able to do an Anwar or Kugan on you if they so choose and can afford it or have good contact to execute it!

Nobody will be safe if we do not stand up and voice out our opposition to gross manipulation of our democratic system underpinned by our pillars of democracy. The politicians are very sensitive to public opinions and when the public overwhelmingly demands that they stop destroying our democracy, they will have no choice but to follow suit because every citizen holds the power to send them to oblivion through the ballot boxes.

Make use of your voice and your vote!

This trial is a bald-faced attempt to permanently remove an opposition leader from Malaysian politics, said Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. The government is trying to manipulate the justice system for political purposes.

Nature of charge changed at whim and fancy when the governmence effectiveness and rule of law. Voice and accountability,burning burning najib fiddle with sodomy2 directed by rosmah can we afford another Anwar prosecutionDatuk Ambiga Sreenevasan?

The current charge against Anwar relates to allegations that on June 26, 2008, he had sexual relations with Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan, a 23-year-old male former volunteer aide to Anwar. Although initially filed as a non-consensual offense, prosecutors later changed the charge to consensual sodomy, though Saiful has never been charged.Charge Saiful for making a false report and cau! sing all the trouble. Send him to jail to share with perverts so that he can fulfill his dream TIME: Circa 2006 LOCATION: THE UNITED STATESof TANAH MELAYU

A conviction would force Anwar to vacate his seat in Parliament and effectively bar him from contesting in the next general election, expected before 2012.

Anwars July 15 court application to drop the sodomy charge rests on the basis of two medical reports. Three specialists from the public Kuala Lumpur Hospital endorsed a July 13, 2008 medical report regarding the complainant that found no conclusive clinical findings suggestive of penetration to the anus and no significant defensive wound on the body of the patient.political comedy satire THE NAJISROSMAA-THE SAYFOOL STORY THE MALAYSIAN VERSION WATERGATE WHO PUT HIM IN , WHO PUSHED IN MAA MAAMIAH

A doctor at the private Pusrawi Hospital who examined Saiful on June 28, 2008, two days after the alleged incident, reported the anus as normal. The doctor later left Malaysia to escape what he said was persistent pressure to alter his report.

In addition, the defense will reiterate its January 2009 request for at least 10 documents it asserts are necessary for it to properly prepare Anwars defense at trial. They include the original closed-circuit television recordings from the alleged crime scene, original specimens from which DNA samples were allegedly obtained, chemists notes, witness statements including the complainants, and medical reports.the credibility of (BN) government The doctrine, which calls for checks and balances between the three estates of government, has been dead in the countrys system of political governance since 1998.

To date, the Public Prosecutors office has denied it is withholding any documents it is mandated to share under the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code.

Providing the defendant with evidence crucial for preparing his defense is a basic requirement of a fair trial, said Pearson. The prosecutions withholding of key ! evidence is a red flag of political shenanigans.

Escalating case to reduce Anwars avenues of appeal

Concerns about a fair trial were heightened on July 1 after the court dismissed Anwars appeal challenging Attorney General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patails decision to move the trial to the High Court from the Sessions Court where it originated.

Transfer to a high court reduces opportunities for a defense appeal to higher courts should Anwar be found guilty. Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi then stated publicly in July 2008 that Abdul Gani, who is also public prosecutor, would have no part in Anwars trial as he is under investigation by the Anti-Corruption Commission for allegedly falsifying evidence to protect those involved in an assault on Anwar in 1998 while he was in police custody during the earlier sodomy trial.

Sessions Court Judge Komathy Suppiah ruled in March that, it is evident that any involvement by the AG [Gani] in this case would seriously undermine public confidence in the administration of criminal justice. The High Court overruled Judge Komathys decision, stating that Gani was only acting administratively in approving the transfer and thus was not involved in the new trial.

Hammering through new DNA law

DNA issues are also contentious in the case. On June 23, 2009, the lower house of Parliament quickly passed the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification Act, which will go into effect after Senate and Royal assent. It would allow police to take DNA samples from criminal suspects and to use those samples to build a DNA databank.

Anwar has repeatedly refused to submit DNA samples in this case on the grounds that current law does not require it and because of his reasonable concern for evidence tampering as happened in his 1998 trial.

The proposed DNA law includes a provision stating that any existing DNA profile and any information in relation thereto kept and maintained by the Chemistry Department of Malaysia or Royal Mala! ysia Pol ice, immediately before coming into operation of this Act shall form part of the DNA Databank established under this Act.

Circumventing Anwars refusal to provide a new DNA sample, this would permit the manipulated samples from his previous trial to be used as evidence and manipulated again during the upcoming trial.

Other language in the bill raises fair-trial concerns. Article 24 reads: Any information from the DNA Database shall be admissible as a conclusive proof of the DNA identification in any proceedings in any court. Such decisive stipulations ignore well-known information that DNA databanks are not foolproof, and are often prone to tampering and mistakes in evidence collection and handling.

As a safeguard, many courts around the world have determined that information gleaned from DNA cannot be conclusive and must always be corroborated. Those responsible for the collection of evidence must be professional, competent, and beyond the reach of any improper interference.Najib strategy at the moment:to get Hadi Awang and his deputy Nasharudin Mat Isa endorse traumatized Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan story their intention is to convict him by hook or by crook,

Serious concerns about fairness and impartial administration of justice, combined with heavy-handed police tactics at the time of Anwars arrest and intimidation of witnesses, are reminiscent of Anwars earlier, deeply marred sodomy trial, Human Rights Watch said. Given these concerns, Human Rights Watch renewed its call for the charge against Anwar to be dropped immediately.

The Malaysian government should stop using the courts to pursue political vendettas, said Pearson. Unless it drops these dubious charges against Anwar, it risks giving its reputation another black eye. Ghani Patail and Musa Hassan will go down well in history as the greatest crook of all time who make a joke out of the judiciary, the law and order and the human rights of Malaysia.

Sodomy (committing carnal intercourse ! against the order of nature), even when consensual, is punishable in Malaysia under Section 377B of the Penal Code by up to 20 years in prison and whipping.

Human Rights Watch urges the Malaysian authorities to uphold international human rights standards by decriminalizing consensual homosexual conduct and replacing Section 377A with a gender-neutral rape law.

- Human Rights Watch is an international watchdog based in New York, U.S.
- http://www.hrw.org/

The list of legal transgressions goes
All of these acts call into question some very serious issues relating to the conduct and professional capacity that our legal community has exhibited both within and outside the government.

I am not a lawyer. I am a journalist. But there is no doubt in my mind that the legal community could have prevented this scam by clearly distinguishing for their clients what is lawful versus what is unlawful. This would have meant advising their clients against the actions that they took as opposed to telling them what they wanted to hear.I am raising this issue in the hope that it will lead to further debate and introspection among those with a deeper understanding of law.

Judge for yourselves, my learned friends.

Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

HRP coming out with election manifesto

GEORGE TOWN: Human Rights Party (HRP) is finalising a 15-point election manifesto to face a possible snap general election this year.

The manifesto, among other things, will demand a minimum monthly wage of RM1,300 for all local workers.

HRP secretary-general P Uthayakumar said the demand for minimum wage was not unreasonable given that even unskilled foreigners were earning more than RM1,300 per month in the country.

“A local worker cannot sustain a reasonably comfortable living standard under the current rapidly escalating cost of living.

“Our minimum wage demand is conservative,” Uthayakumar, a former ISA detainee, told FMT today.

The manifesto will also demand a round-the-clock social security (Socso) coverage for all contributing workers.

Currently, Socso only covers injuries or deaths that occurred to workers during working hours and when travelling between their homes and working places.

Uthayakumar said that Sosco was a poor man’s insurance policy and the workers regularly contributed to the scheme from their hard-earned monthly income.

“Hence, its coverage should be 24, not limited, hours,” he added.

Pension scheme

HRP will also demand that Socso policy include a pension scheme for all workers in the private sector, similar to the one enjoyed by ethnic Malay-dominated public sector.

Uthayakumar said that Socso should pay half of the last drawn monthly salary as a monthly pension to retired workers.

HRP also wants the Socso pension benefits to be extended to the widow or children under 21 of any deceased retirees.

“Socso shall be another retirement scheme, apart from the EPF (Employees Provident Fund), for local workers,” he said.

HRP believes that by expanding the coverage and benefits of Socso policy, private sector workers would not lose out due to the government privatisation policy on public enterprises.

Uthayakumar said the manifesto would demand the government convert the loans given out by the National Tertiary Education Fund Corporation into scholarships for all deserving students irrespective of their ethnic or religious backgrounds.

HRP will also demand a gazetted area to build places of worship for any religious ethnic community that has a minimum of 500 people residing in a particular residential area.

“HRP believes that each ethnic community has equal rights to co-exist and practise their respective religious beliefs.

“The government is duty-bound to legalise this right,” Uthayakumar said.

Candidates shorlisted

HRP has formed an eight-man election manifesto committee chaired by a ne Dr S Paraman to formulate and finalise the manifesto.

The manifesto will be unveiled officially after its central executive meeting in Kuala Lumpur on Jan 22.

HRP predicts that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak will call for only a snap parliamentary election, not state polls, within the next five months.

The party has already shortlisted candidates for 15 parliamentary seats that it planned to contest in the polls.

The seats are Padang Serai, Sungai Siput, Alor Gajah, Lembah Pantai, Batu Kawan, Ipoh Barat, Teluk Kemang, Rasah, Kota Raja, Cameron Highlands, Kuala Selangor, Hulu Selangor, Klang, Bagan Datoh and Tebrau.

Uthayakumar urged Pakatan Rakyat to pave the way for his party candidates to face BN in straight fights in its designated federal seats.

Given that Umno and BN were the common enemies, he said it was inevitable for BN opponents to combine forces, and pool and mobilise their resources together to face the next general election.

He pointed out that no governments in the world, except in Malaysia, Singapore, communist China and military-ruled Myanmar, have survived for over half a century.

HRP has already sent letters dated Dec 19 to Pakatan leaders Anwar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang and Abdul Hadi Awang, offering an olive branch of cooperation in the next election.

But Pakatan leaders have not responded to it.

“People want change. I am sure Pakatan would not want to let slip the golden chance to displace Umno and BN.

“But if Pakatan refuses cooperation, we will contest on our own… there will be no more free lunches from us,” said Uthayakumar.

The most dangerous man in Malaysia

from 1Malaysia

Written by Mariam Mokhtar, Malaysia Chronicle

Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak is running scared. Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad did not mince his words when he accused the federal government of manoeuvring to dissolve the Selangor state legislative assembly by appointing Mohd Khusrin Munawi as the state secretary.

Khalid said, "This is the evil and despicable plan of BN. Najib wants to create chaos in Selangor and force the dissolution of the state legislative assembly."

Khusrin, the former private secretary to former-Selangor Menteri besar Muhammad Muhammad Taib and outgoing Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) director, has been commanded by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to initiate moves to create dissent.

This deliberate attempt by Putrajaya to cause turmoil in Selangor is reminiscent of the debacle that Najib engineered in Perak last year. The ousted Perak Menteri Besar Nizar Jamaluddin who suffered at the hands of Najib has already warned Selangor of the fate that will befall them if they do not take precautions.

If Najib was surprised at the way the rakyat reacted to his machinations, none was more surprised than the Sultan of Perak. His Royal Highness was taken aback at how Najib managed to galvanise the rakyat. In the end, evil may have triumphed but as they say, elephants never forget...and others might even add, they never forgive either.

Najib is desperate. And a desperate man will resort to desperate measures.

He has to call an election before long. But his knows that his 1Malaysia is falling apart. Even his one-time mentor former Prime minister Mahathir Mohamad is confused by 1Malaysia. His deputy has rejected it outright. His Cabinet is seen as corrupt, inept and not practising his 1Malaysia views.

Worst of all, his non-Malay BN component parties such as MCA and MIC, are toothless and do not attract popular support. Whenever there is a racial or religious infringement, the best they can do is wring their hands in mock horror. They are what can be termed as "wasted space".

In the first year of being in office Najib spent most of his time overseas and neglected to attend to matters of state. His reputation abroad needs to be propped up by centre-fold advertisements costing USD5million highlighting his wife's achievements. His wife invites Hollywood celebrities, who visit under the cloak of secrecy, to be shown "the real Malaysia". We ask, which version of the "real" Malaysia?

Najib knows that under normal circumstance Pakatan will triumph in the general elections. That is why he has to do his preparatory work first.

This man is dangerous. He was not elected as Prime Minister and has no known credentials of being a leader. Being a career politician by piggy-backing on the name of his father is no real test of leadership. What true experience has he of the real world?

No leader blatantly offers the people of a town RM5 million in exchange for votes. No leader tries to influence voting by offering to repair schools. Broken-down schools should be repaired as a matter of course.

Najib's cabinet is in disarray and tainted with known charges of corruption, sexual scandals including rape, and mismanagement of the public purse.

Najib knows he has a lot to lose. He is also aware that if he goes down, he drags others down too - People who rose up the ranks not through merit, strength of character and their policies. These people are dependent on him to stay in power, to protect them.

Just like Najib, these sycophants fear for their positions, ill-gotten wealth and reputation. They know that with the Opposition in power, they will be stripped of all these and may face ruin in prison.

These people used bribery and blackmail to serve themselves, robbed us of our democratic rights, and in some cases eliminated others so that they could achieve what they have always craved for - power.

Najib believes he can take Selangor by his underhand tactics. Just like he what did in Perak. So how deep are his pockets? What sort of leader pits its own people against each other? Is he so morally banrkrupt?

Perak's experience was not a fight of non-Malays versus Malays, like what his father engineered just over four decades ago.

This time, Selangor's power tussle involves a people who have are oppressed and who are fighting for the simple desire to enjoy their democratic right. These people dare pit their wills against those who gladly accept further ruin by Najib.

Najib has conveniently forgotten his "People First, Performance Now" slogan. He is on shaky ground and he does what he knows best - sowing the seeds of confusion and discontent. He is no true patriot. He is a deceiver and suffers amongst other things from crab-mentality.

The Opposition win of 2008 was a humiliating blow for Umno. Najib cannot afford another defeat.

He is aware of the people's support for Pakatan. So he pulls out his remaining trick, which involves royalty.

This is Najib's most dastardly act, to involve the Sultan. He has everything to lose so he does not care if he compromises the

neutrality of the Sultan.

Najib is prepared to use the Sultan against his people. Just like what he did with the Perak Sultan whose popularity plummeted after the fiasco in Perak.

How does one know? You can gauge it from the lack of warmth that the people normally have reserved for the Sultan of Perak.

These days there is neither spontaneity nor depth of feeling and sincerity when Perakians meet their Sultan. The Perak Sultan's drop in popularity is directly attributed to Najib.

Najib's greed is to stay on in power. His fear is to be charged with the various crimes that he is suspected of having committed.

Najib is prepared to risk the future of the monarchy by using the Sultan as a pawn.

That is why the most dangerous man in Malaysia is Najib Abdul Razak.

Mamak: Nik Aziz is a gay ...

Pakatan Parties Sending All The Wrong Signals

from Welcome to Malaysia-Instinct.com by zul@email.com (zul)

Things may remain bleak for Parti Keadilan Rakyat this year.

This is the verdict of political analysts who believe the party may find it hard to get rid of the stains of its controversial first direct-election and the various allegations against the party leadership.

Assoc Prof Dr Ahmad Nidzam Sulaiman, who is Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia comparative politics lecturer, said 2010 started badly for Pakatan-PKR when four PKR members of parliament left the party, citing “loss of faith”.

Another was sacked for attacking the party leadership.

Allegations against its deputy president, Mohamed Azmin Ali, have also hurt the party.

For the record, Azmin has been accused of vote-buying and labelled as the blue-eyed boy of PKR supremo Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, and, worse, as an “opportunist”.
The internal bickering, too, has damaged the party’s credibility.

All these were being watched closely by the fence-sitters in particular, said Universiti Sains Malaysia school of social sciences senior lecturer Dr Azeem Fazwan Ahmad Farouk.

“As such, PKR may not do as well as in 2008 because everyone has heard what happened in the elections,” he said.

Since the elections, a candidate for the post of PKR Youth chief, Badrul Hisham Shaharin or Chegubard, has rejected his appointment as deputy secretary-general. Now, uppermost on his mind is to see the outcome of investigations into alleged election irregularities.

The pressure is on the PKR leadership to deliver on this key promise.

Also, prominent supreme council member and deputy president candidate Datuk Zaid Ibrahim left the party, on the back of alleged vote-buying.

To sum it all up, Pakatan Rakyat had been sending all the wrong signals by not acting as one, for instance, over the banning of the 1Malaysia logo in Selangor, said Azeem.

The popular verdict is that Pakatan appears to be flip-flopping over the logo ban. It could have been caught between wanting to show the electorate that it is accommodating as a government, and, as a political group, wishing to contain the recovery of Barisan Nasional.

Hence, state exco member Ronnie Liu’s tough stance on the ban did not go down too well with some of his Pakatan colleagues worried that voters could punish them for the bad treatment of the unifying 1Malaysia.

Tracing PKR’s and Pakatan Rakyat’s performance since their impressive showing in the March 2008 general election, pundits said they had found a number of trends. This was particularly pronounced last year.

One, Pakatan parties have not graduated to behaving like a ruling party, trapped in opposition mode.

Two, BN seems to have gone about its house-cleaning exercise better.
Three, latest by-election results seem to favour BN.

Azeem makes the argument on BN faring better on the key planks of unity and reform.

“Even (former MIC president) Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu has decided to retire early,” he said.

As for the 2010 by-elections results, Universiti Teknologi Mara faculty of administrative science and policy studies lecturer Assoc Prof Shaharuddin Badaruddin said although Pakatan won the mid-year Sibu by-election, BN had since picked up pace, winning in Batu Sapi and Galas.

“This has created an impact for the BN machinery and they are more than ready to face the Tenang by-election this month,” he added.

The by-election is set for Jan 30 following the death of incumbent assemblyman Datuk Sulaiman Taha of Umno.

Pundits believe policy-making and delivery will help determine the winner.

Universiti Utara Malaysia International Studies programme chairman Dr Azizuddin Mohd Sani said political parties should explain what was in store for the rakyat.

Umno will provide greater clarity in this aspect through its Juara Rakyat programme which begins this month. The programme will feature a monthly theme — as an example, education in January, and welfare, the following month.

As for the outlook this year, BN and Pakatan would continue to be the main players, said the pundits.

Zaid’s newly formed Parti Kesejahteraan Insan Tanahair, or Kita, may not last unless Zaid starts tackling the grassroots earnestly and engineers an influx of members from other parties.

Defuse Selangor constitutional crisis by suspending Khusrins appointment or Najibs slogan of an inclusive 1Malaysia government would suffer another irreparable blow

The Chief Secretary, Tan Sri Sidek Hassan should defuse a Selangor inherent predicament by suspending Datuk Mohd Khusrin Munawis appointment as State Secretary as well as consulting a Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim upon a most preferred nominee to be a top Selangor civil servant or Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razaks aphorism of an thorough 1Malaysia supervision would humour an additional lost blow.Najibs 1Malaysia judgment admitted as its idea to have Malaysia some-more vibrant, some-more prolific as well as some-more competitive by entirely embracing our farrago of ethnicity, religions as well as ideology and, by being inclusive, set up mutual apply oneself as well as acceptance in to a solid substructure of trust as well as cohesiveness.The 1Malaysia Government Transformation Programme Roadmap made open a year ago had identified 7 areas to achieve a ideals of 1Malaysia, with a idealisation idea privately spelt out as to emanate a Malaysian republic where every Malaysian perceives himself or herself as Malaysian first, as well as by race, religion, geographical region or socio-economic background second as well as where a ideology of 1Malaysia are woven in to a economic, domestic as well as amicable fabric of society.The 7 areas are:

The manage to buy as well as inhabitant unity under 1Malaysia

Education as well as inhabitant unity under 1Malaysia

Promoting 1Malaysia amicable interactions

Managing religious as well as cultural polarities

Towards a truly 1Malaysia government

Promoting as well as practising comprehensive 1Malaysia politics.

Promoting an comprehensive 1Malaysia media.

A clever box can be made out which detached from massive propagation of a 1Malaysia logo in a past year, a 1Malaysia judgment has suffered even larger setbacks rsther than have larger inroads in all a 7 areas concerned.The inherent predicament over a appointment of a Selangor State Secretary without consulting a Selangor Mentri Besar under! lines a actuality which a Chief Secretary as well as a Federal Government are not prepared to set a example of being entirely committed to a truly 1Malaysia supervision which entirely embraces inclusiveness in a federal-state attribute involving different domestic coalitions using a Federal as well as state governments.If a 1Malaysia judgment of inclusiveness, to set up as well as promote mutual apply oneself as well as acceptance between Malaysians in any case of ethnicity, religion or ideology (which contingency include domestic beliefs) is a running inhabitant spirit under a Najib premiership, a Chief Secretary would be even some-more aware which he should deliberate with a Selangor Mentri Besar upon a appointment of a Selangor State Secretary so as to strengthen trust as well as cohesiveness in Federal-state relations instead of mouth-watering a conflicting consequences.A full-blown Selangor inherent predicament over a appointment of a Selangor State Secretary would be explanation which Najibs 1Malaysia judgment is an empty aphorism reason because a Selangor inherent predicament should be defused rught away with a Chief Secretary suspending Kushrins appointment as well as entirely consulting a Selangor Mentri Besar upon a preferred nominee for a post.

Pretty much the only thing DAP can do ... blog about things like this article

Defuse Selangor constitutional crisis by suspending Khusrin’s appointment or Najib’s slogan of an inclusive 1Malaysia government would suffer another irreparable blow

The Chief Secretary, Tan Sri Sidek Hassan should defuse the Selangor constitutional crisis by suspending Datuk Mohd Khusrin Munawi’s appointment as State Secretary and consulting the Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim on the most ideal appointee to be the top Selangor civil servant or Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s slogan of an inclusive 1Malaysia government would suffer another irreparable blow. Najib’s 1Malaysia concept proclaimed as its goal “to make Malaysia more vibrant, more productive and more competitive” by fully embracing “our diversity of ethnicity, religions and beliefs and, by being inclusive, build mutual respect and acceptance into a solid foundation of trust and cohesiveness”. The 1Malaysia Government Transformation Programme Roadmap made public a year ago had identified seven areas to achieve the ideals of 1Malaysia, with the ultimate goal specifically spelt out as to create a Malaysian nation where “every Malaysian perceives himself or herself as Malaysian first, and by race, religion, geographical region or socio-economic background second and where the principles of 1Malaysia are woven into the economic, political and social fabric of society”. The seven areas are:

1. The economy and national unity under 1Malaysia
2. Education and national unity under 1Malaysia
3. Promoting 1Malaysia social interactions
4. Managing religious and cultural polarities
5. Towards a truly 1Malaysia government
6. Promoting and practising all-inclusive 1Malaysia politics.
7. Promoting an all-inclusive 1Malaysia media.

A strong case can be made out that apart from massive propagation of the 1Malaysia logo in the past year, the 1Malaysia concept has suffered even greater setbacks rather make greater inroads in all the seven areas concerned. The constitutional crisis over the appointment of the Selangor State Secretary without consulting the Selangor Mentri Besar underlines the fact that the Chief Secretary and the Federal Government are not prepared to set the example of being fully committed to a “truly 1Malaysia government” which fully embraces inclusiveness in a federal-state relationship involving different political coalitions running the Federal and state governments. If the 1Malaysia concept of inclusiveness, to build and promote mutual respect and acceptance among Malaysians regardless of ethnicity, religion or beliefs (which must include political beliefs) is the guiding national spirit under the Najib premiership, the Chief Secretary would be even more mindful that he should consult with the Selangor Mentri Besar on the appointment of the Selangor State Secretary so as to strengthen trust and cohesiveness in Federal-state relations instead of inviting the opposite consequences. A full-blown Selangor constitutional crisis over the appointment of the Selangor State Secretary would be proof that Najib’s 1Malaysia concept is an empty slogan – reason why the Selangor constitutional crisis should be defused immediately with the Chief Secretary suspending Kushrin’s appointment and fully consulting the Selangor Mentri Besar on the ideal appointee for the post.

The Khusrin affair — Another Perak?

Is the Perak comparison overdramatic?

Let’s take a step back and examine the institution that Datuk Mohd Khusrin Munawi has been selected to lead in Selangor.

The civil service exists to provide continuity between governments.

While institutions like an independent judiciary, an empowered legislature and a free media (none of which seem to exist in Malaysia) are designed to provide checks and balances to the executive, the noble role of the civil service is to implement all legal policies of the government of the day — not to challenge it, frustrate it, or act as a political force of their own in any way.

Unfortunately, in Selangor, there have been numerous complaints of civil servants — especially at the local government level — that have quietly bottlenecked, failed to implement or actively blocked policies by the new state government.

While some civil servants have demonstrated impeccable professionalism and dedication to duty, others appear to be in denial of what they feel is a one-term government and seek to curry favour with the political coalition whose return to power they feel is only a matter of time.

Khusrin ranked eighth out of eight

Against such a backdrop, let’s revisit what happened. As the outgoing state chief secretary retired, a commission was appointed by the state government to interview potential replacements.

It must be noted that the current law regarding the appointment of the state secretary is vague, saying that the decision should be done by “the relevant public services commission.”

Eventually, eight individuals were interviewed by the state-appointed commission, and three were short-listed. It is understood that Datuk Khusrin was ranked last of these eight candidates.

As these names were being presented to the Sultan of Selangor, the federal government pre-emptively announced that Datuk Khusrin had been picked as the new Chief Secretary of Selangor. The elected chief executive of the Selangor government was at no point consulted regarding this appointment.

Appointing a man known to have strained relations with the government of the day and deemed by the same government to be least suitable amongst qualified candidates is nothing less than an act of sabotage.

Sabotage and destabilisation?

How tragic that the federal government would knowingly spark such a crisis, blatantly ignoring the negative impact on the people of Selangor.

Is this a precursor to further attempts to create a conflict that will destabilise the Selangor state government and render it inoperable? Would the ruling party sink to such levels as to knowingly destabilise the state government in some attempt to make their political opponents look bad?

I suppose we need only look to our neighbours to the north for an answer.

As the Perak constitutional crisis waged on, the State Secretary of Perak had a pivotal role to play. His actions and true allegiances became plain for all to see when he played a partisan role and at one point had then mentri besar Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin unceremoniously thrown out of the state secretariat.

Selangor is clearly not at the stage Perak was in early 2009, but in creating a conflict within the institutions of government, we can see the same hand brewing the same recipe for disaster.

Federal strong-arm tactics

Again, is this interpretation over dramatic?

Let us start by asking the simple question: Why Khusrin?

There must be a good working relationship between the government of the day and the civil service. As the government is democratically elected, it must surely be allowed as the people’s representatives and custodian of authority to have a say in how the civil service is led and run. How else would they ensure that the policies that they have been voted in to enact will be implemented professionally?

As Khalid himself rightly pointed out, could we expect the federal government to function properly if an individual known to be at odds with the prime minister and his government was appointed as Chief Secretary of the federal government?

I think many observers will agree that Khalid has been extremely accommodating of the civil service, and vigorously upheld the principle that politics should not have an undue influence on the civil service.

Such a track record suggests that of the candidates available, surely the federal and state governments can — if they so wish — be reasonable and agree to a compromise candidate.

The three candidates chosen by the state government are all fully qualified members of the civil service who meet every criteria necessary for the position of chief secretary.

What possible reason could there be for the federal government to refuse to consider even one of these candidates, to break this impasse and ensure the smooth running of the government?

Sadly, it is the tragedy of politics that sometimes the most obvious, appropriate solutions seem to be the ones most scarcely found to be practised in reality.

Solutions

If the federal government persists most illogically and without any clear reasoning to insist on a candidate that seems to be selected on the basis of political inclinations, we can only hope that an alternative solution can be found.

As the state government now looks to the state assembly for such a solution, we hope that any new law or amendment passed will reflect a spirit of co-operation and emphasis on the welfare of the people, rather than narrow political interests.

* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.

Opinion

Nathaniel Tan believes this world is full of people, he was born to love them all. He blogs atwww.jelas.info and tweets @NatAsasi

Another blast from Dr. Ronnie Tan Kee Kwong

from WTF Malaysian Government by DJK

Dr. Tan Kee Kwong on PETRONAS; PM/UMNO's PRIVATE PIGGY BANK.

Another blast from Dr. Ronnie Tan Kee Kwong...

" Without fear and favour..", this heroic scion of
Tan Sri Dr. Tan Chee Khoon... .. an intrepid politician of his father's mettle and character...

From the desk of Dr Tan Kee Kwong 14/8/2010


Dear Najib & your cronies in the BN,

I learnt with alarm that for the past 3 years, Petronas has given to the Federal Government 290 billion ie 290,000 JUTA! Wow, what a fantastic sum of money. Please Najib, Pak Lah & Mahathir, tell us the rakyat how you spent or wasted this huge sum of money.

As I have said before, Petronas as an entity, was & still is quite a well run company. But the past 3 PM,s have ruined it all. By a special Act of Parliament passed in the 70's PDA ie Petroleum Development Act, Petronas is only accountable to the PM ONLY. In the past we had 2 Oil Ministers who had no say at all. Even under PDA, the Minister of Finance has no say at all. Even the Cabinet cannot examine the true accounts of Petronas. What a shame. This is totally unacceptable. You can rest assured that the incoming Pakatan Rakyat Federal Government will change all that. those that have plundered the wealth of the nation had better watch out, you will be charged & sent to jail for a very long time!

DIVIDENDS PAID
Under Mahathir, Dividends paid to the Govt was about 2 to 3 billion annually. The so called Mr Clean ie Pak Lah forced Petronas to pay 10 billion then 20 billion finally to pay 30 billion. During Mr Clean tenure as PM dividends paid was 10x what was paid during Mahathir's time. Where did all this money go? Mainly to finance all the budget deficits during his rule. A lot went to useless Defense spending. Also the nation only got 10 billion worth out of 30 billion!

In the 80's& 90's about 100 billion was spent from Petronas coffers to bail out Bank Bumiputra TWICE. Also during the finacial crise of 1997, Petronas was forced to buy MISC to bail out Mahatir's son.

KLCC LAND, ANOTHER BIG TIME SCAM
I remember in the mid 50's my family stayed for 2 years in no 2 Jalan Penang . At that time there was only the Race Course there. As kids we enjoyed plucking the delicious rambutans there. Now it is so different.
At that time the HQ of Petronas was housed in Dayabumi. There was a severe shortage of office space as the Petronas operations expanded very fast.

Initially the plan was to build a new HQ in Jln Tun Razak, opposite the Royal Sgor Golf Club.(site of the present Prnce Court Hospital ) That plan was aborted as the DCA(Dept of Civil Aviation) objected strongly as it was in the flight path of the Sungai BesiRMAF Air Base. Then Petronas went ahead to buy a piece of land in Jalan Ampang, behind Yow Chuan Plaza for only 30 million.

Suddenly Mahathir intervened & came out with a devious plan to steal the money from Petronas to enrich his special crony etc. First, was the outcry in the press on how the Race Course was causing massive traffic jams every week-end. So the Federal Government & DBKL decided that the Race Course must shift to Sungai Besi, its present site. If the land was sold/surrendered from the Turf Club to Petronas direct that will be perfectly OK. BUT the Turf Club was forced to sell its land to a very special Mahatir Crony. Within a matter of a few months the special crony sold the land to Petronas at a huge price of 600 Million! The top brass of Petronas was instructed, CANNOT negotiate the price, just pay. How ridiculous, who pays 600 million without even a one dollar discount.
Please Mahathir, you were in charge of Petronas then who was the crony/individual involved & who others benefited.

PAK LAH "GAVE" AWAY BLOCK L AND BLOCK M, SARAWAK
Another ginormous scandal that cost the nation US100 BILLION. Recently Mahathir wrote in his blog site that 3 weeks before Pak Lah stepped down as PM he "gave' the above land to Brunei . Wonder what made him do that, maybe in one of his naps in public he just assigned our rights to Brunei . I am sure it was not for free, many relatives & cronies benefited because this is a business deal, not an NGO doing charity.
In the past Petronas went into joint sharing agreements with Vietnam , Cambodia , Thailand , Indonesia etc This should have been the case in Block L and Block M.

Sarawakians , plaese wake up. You stay in on of the poorest states in Malaysia . Your Ketua Menteri(Pek Moh) is so blatantly corrupt that even his BN broyhers in SUPP are complaining. And Pak Lah "gave"your wealth away to Brunei

IN CONCLUSION

UMNO/BN please come clean on the real affairs of Petronas
Abolish the present PDA Act. Replace it with a better & more transparent Act that the financial affairs of Petronas MUST be accountable to the Parliament
Examine the real cause of the severe drop in FDI. Not only that even the local tycoons have very little faith in this country. Don't you care. Every year at least 400,000 finish their SPM examinations. With this state of affairs what is going to happen to them?

Don't just enrich yourselves, give a little bit back to the Nation!