Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Is nurul ready?IOO reasons Why Najib should think of quitting


My friend, like me I presume, has no claim to fame as activist. We are normal, working, struggling mothers of twos fighting hard to survive with dignity in a migrant situation, where even bringing up your kids also is a lonely struggle, a dependent situation on strangers, or the occasional elderly in the family, who would themselves, do better with care and company

A leader is a person who inspires, by her actions, her followers to dream and do the impossible. A leader is a person who makes extraordinary things happen. A leader is a person who is very influential and has a high degree of influencing skills. A leader is inspiring by his thoughts, his deeds, his words, his actions. A leader by definition, makes things happen and does not stand by on the side while things happen.

Take any leader and you will see that this is so. If these things are not happening, then I would doubt very much if the said person is a leader.

A leader takes responsibility for the actions of the persons he supposedly leads. A leader does not say, I dont know. The leader knows that the buck stops at him and takes full accountability for the same. Two examples from Indian history stand out in my mind.

Mahatma Gandhi (the original Gandhi) undertook a fast unto death after the Chauri Chaura incident. Why did he do that? It was because he felt (and this is important) he was culpable for his followers actions with resulted in the burning down of a police chowky and many deaths.

Lal Bahadur Shastri in 1956, offered his resignation after a railway accident at Mahbubnagar that led to 112 deaths. However, Nehru did not accept his resignation. Three months later, he resigned accepting moral and constitutional responsibili! ty for a railway accident at Ariyalur in Tamil Nadu that resulted in 144 deaths. While speaking in the Parliament on the incident, the then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, stated that he was accepting the resignation because it would set an example in constitutional propriety and not because Shastri was in any way responsible for the accident. Shastris unprecedented gesture was greatly appreciated by the citizens.[Wiki entry, here]

Look at history and you will see that leaders rarely share credit for victories but share all the blame when anything goes wrong. And incidentally both these leaders are with the party that today heads the government.

Today the two people from this very same party who head the government - one official, one unofficial are leaders of a different nature. One has no idea what is happening under his watch or atleast claims to have no knowledge of what is happening under his watch. He has the certificate of integrity provided by all concerned. And the person he reports to, unconstitutionally, has nothing to say, except take potshots
at the opposition. What about the billions looted? Why was your government sitting on all these scams? And these reports were out by atleast one newspaper in 2008 itse

It beats me a government that is reportedly the readmore IOO reasons Why Najib should think of quitting

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

  • Datuk Najib the subject here is not corruption is special privileges.
  • FilthOF UMNO and Evil MAHATHIR never ever changes it can hide, camoufla
  • I was wrong

Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

Azmin and Puncak Wangi.. hmm!

  • When the story written by Nantha Kumar on FMT which alleged that the Selangor government has awarded a contract to a previously unknown RM2 company to build nine blocks of high-rise buildings in Section 52,Petaling Jaya. The story creates ripples on the electronic media that led to emails being circulated all over. In my busy year end closing, I had to find time to research this matter. My attempt to reach the reporter failed miserably. After reading a letter published by a reader in MT I decide to pen what I have gathered thus far. I hope Nantha Kumar read this as he certainly has some explanation to do.


  • From my research, I concluded that Nantha Kumar has written rubbish and unsubstantiated story. It carries many facts which are absolutely not true. I pity Azmin in this case. He may not be one of my many favorite ADUN but he certainly gets my sympathy and support in this matter. From my research there are many flaws in his article. My conclusion is based on the following facts.

  • The story goes back in 2004 where KT was the MB. On 29/9/2005, the SSG under KT signed a privatization agreement with Puncak Wangi Sdn Bhd (PWSB) to relocate the Selangor DVS land (Lot 8 ) in Section 52 PJ somewhere in Subang area. PWSB was a company set up in Sept 1995 which appears to have shareholder changes in 2005 where Gapurna Sdn Bhd owns 92.5% share and two other individuals by the name of Mohd Azrin and Krushiah Ali holds the balance of 7.5%. It is not a RM2 company but a company with paid up capital of RM200K. The corporate structure of all entities can be shown as below.


  • Unverified report suggest that the land where PKNS building sits today on a piece land ide! ntified as Lot 12 which a land area of 9.85 acres. Under KT, PKNS sold part of the land measuring 8 acres to Gapurna Sdn Bhd leaving behind a small 1.85 acres land form PKNS to build its HQ. However there is no document available in public domain to suggest the sale. It was said that the land was too small to yield the desired built up space.

  • Sometime in 2009 under the stewardship of TSK, SSG went into a negotiation with Gapurna on amalgamating Lot 8 and Lot 12 and to develop the two plots of land and the remnant of PKNS owned 1.85 acre under one combine project. These results in the birth of PJ sentral. Apparently EPF came into the project as an investor and the returns is to be split at the ratio of 60%(Gapurna);30%(PKNS) and 10% (EPF). Again this information is not verified and not available in public domain.

  • The way I see it, PKNS from a loss position of owning a balance of 17% ends up getting 30% share of the project. This is an improvement from 13% based on land area ownership. PKNS from owning a large tract of land (83% of total land area) ends up owning 1.85 acre (16%) under the stewardship of KT. Under the stewardship of TSKI, the ownership of business went up to 30%.

  • On the issue of SSG giving business to PWSB, this does not arise. It is a company belonging to Gapurna and 2 others since 2005 till today. There is no shred of evidence presented to show that these two individuals have some business relationship with AA. It is most likely that the two individuals are proxy to some UMNO politician as there is a possibility that 7.5% share is a reward of some kind for the successful privatization project that involves Lot 8.

  • The SSG has no direct say in this project. PKNS do. FMT claims that SSG gave PWSB a multimillion dollar project because it related to Azmin. This is unlikely as the main contractor of the project is Bisraya Construction SB (BCSB) and it has been the case sinc! e 2005. Unless there is something that FMT knows that we dont then I might be wrong. From what I gather it is very unlikely. I have written to MACC to investigate as it is one way to clear the name AA and SSG. I also agree with Pieter DCruz that the silence on the part of SSG is deafening. They should release some statement to clarify the circumstances as soon as possible.

  • Whatever it is, at this point AA has my support till someone come forward and show that the allegation made by FMT is true.

  • See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Gobala should avoid screaming on Twitter

    I am somewhat surprised, even shocked, to read some of the Twitter messages from Gobalakrishnan of Parti Keadilan Rakyat, who has been lambasting his idol Anwar Ibrahim.

    While I respect Gobala's fortrightness in defending the poor, I can't help but suspect there is a tinge of MIC/BN-type racism in his attacks on Anwar. Is this not the sort of things that one could resolve easily by having face to face talk with Anwar, since Gobala is considered among the top leaders in PKR and therefore would only need to text Anwar on his personal mobile phone?

    Why the need to text the whole Twitterjaya to drive home his point? Granted, whatever Gobala complained about may be valid, and granted, there are people in PKR who might not have the people's welfare in their hearts, but in this, Gobala as a seasoned PKR leader should be able to know when to pick his fights. Has he learnt anything from the Zaid Ibrahim saga? Zaid spoke too much, and instead of getting what he wanted, he became a victim of all sorts of accusation. Finally, he had to make those accusations true by quitting PKR and forming his own party.

    Gobala has been with the Reformasi struggle from day one, and he is well placed among people like Tian Chua and Azmin Ali, both of whom have displayed a commitment to sink or swim. (Well, at least now. Judging by the sudden-ness of defection, one can never be sure!)

    As such, Gobala should use his close contact to resolve the problems of the estate workers which he highlighted. It will be more effective, because when politicians use Twitter to drive home a point, they always come under suspicion of having a different agenda.


    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    All communities, including Indians, must be uplifted


    On Dec 18, 2010 I was appointed as a vice president of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). I welcome this appointment and thank Keadilan for placing their trust in me by appointing me to this position. I hope to bring to the important task facing me, the experience I have gained from more than a decade's work as a human rights lawyer, an activist, and an NGO leader.

    That experience taught me that many of the problems facing the people can only be resolved by engaging in the political process, in order to reform and change the way this country is administered.

    And I have no doubt that Keadilan and the wider Pakatan Rakyat have the resolve and capability to carry out this process of reform and change, and to create a fairer, more just, and more prosperous Malaysia. Pakatan Rakyat's Common Policy Framework is humanist, compassionate, practical and achievable. It is a sign-post to a better future for all Malaysians.

    Unlike the Barisan Nasional component parties, Keadilan is a multi-racial party that acts in the interest of all the races of this country. I recognise that different types of problems are faced by the various communities in this country. These problems have to be looked into according to the needs of each community.

    I am fully aware of the serious problems faced by the Indian community in this country, and resolve to attend to it, hand in hand with the issues facing all the other communities. No community or segment of this country can be said to be enriched, if their brethren in another community remain impoverished. As a human rights lawyer and activist I have represented victims of all races such as Kugan, ex-airman Tharmendran, Aminulrasyid Amzah and Norizan Salleh. As vice president of Keadilan I will continue to assist my fellow Malaysians of every race and creed.

    I do not believe in a politics of cliques, factions and coteries. I believe the aim of politics is not self-aggrandisement or to profit oneself, but to benefit the people and uplift the nation. Whosoever has the good of the people at heart, he is my ally in this struggle.

    I call upon all Malaysians who love freedom and justice to rally around us, and help us save this country from the grip of oppression and misrule.

    I take this opportunity to wish all Malaysian Christians a Merry Christmas!

    N Surendran is PKR vice-president.

    Shaking Off a Father's Political Shadow


    Now, as her father, who was re-elected to Parliament in 2008, faces a second sodomy trial that he denounces as a government conspiracy to thwart his political return, Ms. Nurul Izzah’s own political star is rising. Her recent victory has cemented her position as a key player in the People’s Justice Party, which her father founded and of which her mother, Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, is president.

    By LIZ GOOCH, The New York Times

    Nurul Izzah Anwar in Kuala Lumpur. She is the youngest person to hold a leadership post in the party of her father, Anwar Ibrahim.

    KUALA LUMPUR — When Nurul Izzah Anwar was elected last month to one of the senior leadership posts in the People’s Justice Party at the age of 30, she became the youngest person to hold such a position in the Malaysian party’s history.

    Her success in contesting one of the four vice president positions came just two years after she was elected to Parliament, but her public image has been more than a decade in the making and is inextricably tied to one of Malaysia’s most recognizable politicians.

    The eldest daughter of Anwar Ibrahim, Ms. Nurul Izzah traces her political birth back more than a decade, to when Mr. Anwar, a former deputy prime minister, was jailed on charges of sodomy and abuse of power.

    The jailing of Mr. Anwar, who was released in 2004 after the sodomy charges were overturned, was a pivotal event in his transformation into the leader of Malaysia’s opposition. It also propelled Ms. Nurul Izzah, just 18 at the time of her father’s arrest, into public life, beginning with an impassioned plea for her father’s freedom before the U.N. Commission on Human Rights in Geneva.

    Now, as her father, who was re-elected to Parliament in 2008, faces a second sodomy trial that he denounces as a government conspiracy to thwart his political return, Ms. Nurul Izzah’s own political star is rising. Her recent victory has cemented her position as a key player in the People’s Justice Party, which her father founded and of which her mother, Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, is president.

    “I don’t think after going through 1998 it would be possible to retreat back to a nonpolitical life,” Ms. Nurul Izzah said, referring to her father’s first arrest.

    While some analysts view her election to one of the party’s top posts as an important step toward emerging from her father’s shadow, others take it as a sign that Mr. Anwar’s family is engaging in dynastic politics.

    In an interview in the opposition offices of the Malaysian Parliament, Ms. Nurul Izzah, the only one of Mr. Anwar’s six children to follow their parents into political life, insisted on her independence.

    “Of course I love my father dearly, but at the end of the day, I am a legislator in my own right,” she said. “I have to fight my own wars, and I have my community and constituents to serve. I am answerable to them.”

    She emphasized that she was not appointed but rather elected by the party’s members after campaigning against 17 contenders for the four vice-presidential posts.

    “I am proud of the fact that we had to fight,” she said of the internal party contest. “I believe the fact that we have implemented direct elections as a way to choose our leaders was the best way to celebrate democracy in the party and to prove that no one particular individual can hold sway in terms of affecting the decisions or the outcomes.”

    She also said that campaigning for her father’s freedom had been her own decision, and not the result of family pressure. “It was the right thing to do,” she said.

    It was her work with human rights organizations as well as her father’s arrest, she said, that gave her an understanding of “the things that matter in Malaysia — the state of our judiciary, the state of our civil and political liberties,” and convinced her that politics offered an opportunity to effect change.

    After earning a bachelor’s degree in engineering in Malaysia, Ms. Nurul Izzah completed a master’s in international relations at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

    She returned to Malaysia in 2007 and was coordinating the People’s Justice Party’s activities in Lembai Pantai, a suburban Kuala Lumpur constituency, when the party asked her to run for Parliament in the 2008 election.

    “I had just had a baby then, but in a sense, that was an important move, I felt, in trying to garner support from our young voters,” said Ms. Nurul Izzah, who has two children with her husband, Raja Ahmad Shahrir, who works for the management consulting firm Accenture.

    She defeated the three-term incumbent Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, who is now the minister for women, family and community development, contributing to impressive gains by the opposition and, for the first time in nearly four decades, the governing party’s loss of the two-thirds parliamentary majority needed to amend the Constitution.

    Her father’s most recent tribulations inevitably give rise to the question of whether Ms. Nurul Izzah could eventually step into his shoes as leader of the opposition.

    As his second sodomy trial proceeds, the People’s Justice Party has said that there is a succession plan in the event that Mr. Anwar is jailed again. It has been a turbulent season for him. Last week, he was suspended from Parliament for six months for linking the government’s “1 Malaysia” national unity program with a similar campaign in Israel.

    While Ms. Nurul Izzah said the party must “prepare for the worst,” she sidestepped the question of whether she could be a possible successor to her father. “It’s not about me or what role I would play, but what’s our strategy moving forward,” she said.

    Ong Kian Ming, a political analyst and lecturer at UCSI University in Kuala Lumpur, believes that Mr. Anwar would continue to be the party’s de facto leader even if he returns to prison, and that the next step for Ms. Nurul Izzah would probably be the deputy presidency. If her mother stepped down from the presidency, the current deputy, Azmin Ali, would normally be next in line, but Ms. Nurul Izzah could always challenge him for the top job, Mr. Ong said.

    “She’s at the forefront of a small group of leaders who can and will replace Anwar eventually,” he said.

    Bridget Welsh, an associate professor of political science at Singapore Management University who taught Ms. Nurul Izzah at Johns Hopkins, said her leadership potential was evident early on. But despite the “small steps” Ms. Nurul Izzah has taken to distance herself from her father, Ms. Welsh said she was still “perceived rightly or wrongly as her father’s daughter” and must blaze her own political path.

    Mr. Ong said that any critics within the party had so far kept any resentments about her rapid rise to themselves, and that the young politician had yet to be vigorously tested by internal or external opponents.

    “She’s not really been put through the fire,” Mr. Ong said. “It will be interesting to see how she responds when that moment of political crisis comes about, and it will come.”

    Ms. Nurul Izzah has repeatedly stressed the need to overcome ethnic and religious divisions in Malaysia, where tensions periodically flare, like the firebombing of places of worship early this year.

    She has warned that Malaysia is at risk of becoming a “failed state” if it does not address such tensions and take on issues like the quality of the country’s universities, corruption and laws that prevent free speech.

    While her rise through the party’s ranks has been rapid, overcoming such challenges is likely to require a sustained effort. But Ms. Nurul Izzah emphasizes that she is in for the long haul.

    “In terms of promoting and advocating reform,” she said, “I think it should be a lifelong struggle.”

    Dr M gets Shah Rukh Khan for Christmas

    Oh Macha Dey How Da Doing In Mombai dah?
    Heppi Dwali Santa Karismars Kacha Kacha Hey ? Shuti Shuti Mah Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ...

    (Above is in a dialect widely spoken in Mahathir's Ancestor's hometown that is no longer understood in India because ... they now speak English, not some Sakai dialect of Palembang)

    It's been a busy week for SRK: he met Dmitry Medvedev last Wednesday. – Reuters pic
    NEW DELHI, Dec 24 – When Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad arrives in Mumbai on Christmas eve, he will be the guest of Shah Rukh Khan.

    The former prime minister and his wife, Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohamad Ali, are currently on a private visit to India. They will arrive in India’s financial capital today where they will be hosted by the Bollywood superstar.

    “When he heard that I would be in India, he said that I must visit Bombay (Mumbai).

    “He’s more of a friend than an admirer. I’ve known him for a long time. The last film that I watched of his would be “My Name is Khan”," said Dr M.

    Shah Rukh Khan is expected to hold a special gathering over tea for the couple at his residence in Mumbai on Christmas Day.

    During his two-day visit to the city, Dr Mahathir’s programme will include a tour of one of India’s leading film studios, YRF (Yash Raj Films) Studios.

    Dr M is the second statesman to meet Shah Rukh Khan in the space of a week – the first was Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev, who met the actor last Wednesday during an official visit to India.

    The Consul General of Malaysia in Mumbai, Wan Zaidi Wan Abdullah, will also host a dinner to mark the former prime minister’s visit to the country.

    After Mumbai, Dr Mahathir will head to Kerala, the last stop on his tour of India.

    Yesterday, he met Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh in Delhi. – Bernama

    Kit Siang: Rethink 1 Malaysia sign ban


    Lim wanted the ban reversed to prove Muhyiddin wrong. — file pic
    KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 24 — DAP advisor Lim Kit Siang today urged Selangor to rethink its 1 Malaysia billboards ban, to disprove the deputy prime minister’s claim that Pakatan Rakyat (PR) was afraid of the concept.

    He further rubbished Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s claims that 1 Malaysia was becoming increasingly popular, citing the latter’s own resistance to the idea.

    “Muhyiddin’s statement is downright ridiculous as he himself has declared that he does not fully endorse the 1 Malaysia concept,” Lim said in a press statement.

    He pointed out that Muhyiddin had, on occasion, spoken in a manner “totally inimical” to the objectives of 1 Malaysia, which the Ipoh Timur MP defined as the creation of a nation where every Malaysian perceives themselves as Malaysian first, followed by race, religion, geography and socio-economic status.

    “When I challenged all ministers in Parliament in March this year to declare that they are Malaysians first... Muhyiddin had responded that he was Malay first and Malaysian second,” Lim said.

    He said Muhyiddin’s defence of “racist brainwashing” by the National Civics Bureau (BTN), Datuk Nasir Safar’s remarks on the Chinese and Indians, and his silence at a government forum where Christians were threatened with a repeat of May 13 for wanting to use the word “Allah”, was further evidence that the Umno number two rejected 1 Malaysia.

    Lim went on to highlight Muhyiddin’s “hamfisted attempts” at helping Umno-controlled media like Utusan Malaysia and Berita Harian paint Penang and its DAP chief minister as anti-Malay and anti-Islam, his sidelining of non-Malay contributions in drafting the Federal Constitution, and threat to revoke the citizenship of those who questioned the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) subjects cap.

    “Since March, there has been even more instances of reckless rhetoric of racist extremism and religious bigotry which attack the very basis of the 1 Malaysia slogan,” he added.

    “The 1 Malaysia slogan is in fact the best example of the wide and increasing gulf between words and deeds of the Najib administration... whether 1 Malaysia, Government Transformation Programme, New Economic Model or Economic Transformation Programme.”

    English daily The Star yesterday reported state housing and local government committee chief, Ronnie Liu, remarking that 1 Malaysia billboards were a political message from the BN federal government and were not allowed under local by-laws.

    “You don’t see any billboard in Selangor carrying the PKR, PAS or DAP logo.

    “Local government by-laws in Selangor clearly state that political symbols cannot be used on billboard advertisements,” Liu was quoted saying.

    The Selangor executive councillor stressed the law was not new, dismissing suggestions it was a PR tactic against its political foe. - Malaysian Insider

    What’s So Great about a 2 Party System?



    By batsman

    Really – what’s so great about it? In fact what’s so great about democracy?

    To me they are just means to an end, but there will be those who get stuck at these stages for various reasons. Democracy becomes a religion just as a 2 party system becomes a religion. These people get fanatical about it. Their fanaticism is focused on the vehicle rather than the objective. For such people, cars can become status symbols rather than a means of transport, so poor hawseholes like us have to accept low salaries for long hours in order that these arseholes can indulge in their status symbols.

    But it is still OK if some people want to have luxury cars as status symbols. I don’t sweat it especially if they have worked hard to earn their money. However if some people want to turn the 2 party system into a religion and stop the struggle at that stage, they have something else coming, just as if some people want to have luxury cars by accepting bribes, Ali Baba crony contracts and corruption.

    They say that with a 2 party system it is possible to repeal unjust laws such as the ISA and turn the bureaucracy non-partisan and non-party political. All this is true. However it remains an expectation only and may not be realized in practice.

    The problem with the 2 party system becoming a religion is that even when it fails to produce results and we get excuses and bunkum when promises are broken and unjust laws are not repealed, we are told this is all just work in progress and we have to be patient. To a 2 party system fanatic, the 2 party system IS the end, not just the means to the end.

    I guess it depends on how patient you can become as to whether you can accept the excuse of work in progress. Some people can wait forever until the 2 party system becomes an unbreakable habit and the unjust laws are still not repealed.

    So what are we really fighting for? What is the end? I submit that we fight for a continuously improving society. We want a society that is relatively free of crime and corruption. We do not want abuse of any sort and people have respect for each other.

    What is frightening is that our society is degenerating fast and turning corrupt and sinful and we have no brakes just like double-decked buses with suspected faulty brakes coming down Cameron Highlands while the fanatics are praying to their god called the 2 party system to save them.

    OK so we still do not know if psychopaths are born or artificially created. We cannot do much about psychopaths being born, but we can make sure they are caught early if they express their psychopathy violently and if possible treated or cured, at the very least society is protected from them. We can also make sure that the conditions for the artificial creation of psychopaths are removed from society.

    We also do not know if geniuses are born or bred. We are happy if they are born and try to create conditions whereby their genius can be fully expressed. We can also try and create conditions for geniuses to be bred and encouraged to their full potential. We don’t want situations when geniuses are suppressed because of jealousy or the fight for goodies or racial quarrels.

    Similarly we do not know if homosexuals are born or bred. As with psychopaths and geniuses, we cannot do anything if they are born, but we can try and create conditions where their homosexuality is not encouraged or turned into a religion. By taking a liberal attitude to homosexuals, we are actually allowing homosexuality to be preached and turned into a religion. This means that little boys will be more easily exposed to dirty old men and abuse of little boys and girls will become a little grey as to whether it really is abuse or not, thus suffering double sodomy in the process.

    But what do we do with homosexuals already in our midst whether born naturally or artificially created? I guess you have your opinions about this just as I have mine. What I do not want to see is that just like psychopaths, we do not take an overly liberal attitude such that the social disease spreads unchecked and we allow some people to make homosexuality their religion.

    We therefore do not want a situation where little boys and Indonesian maids are sodomised and the perpetrators get away with it while old men are falsely accused of sodomy in the other extreme. Justice must be done and must be seen to be done whether for little boys or for old men.

    Am I too idealistic? Can we achieve such a perfect system of justice? Maybe not, but I hope I am confronting these situations head on. Anyway, what is so idealistic about wanting a crime free society? Some societies have already achieved it (more or less). Don’t tell me Malaysia Boleh cannot and it is too idealistic to try?

    So it is too idealistic to want something more than a 2 party political system? What if I said that I want a healthy and properly functioning 2 party political system, not just a perverted one that has been turned into a religion? Is this also too idealistic? Are we just fit to have a 2 party system that does not work and has become perverted and deformed even before becoming a reality? This is truly Malaysia Boleh.

    Why do I say that the 2 party political system has already become deformed even before it has become reality? Am I a prophet? Hardly.

    I see it in the arrogance of the PR which is already treating people as outsiders and excluded from the political process. They have started to take the attitude that they are the professionals and the experts and non-party persons are just a nuisance and outsiders. They are now so arrogant that even activists (not just ordinary people) who have slogged to put them in power in a few states are now treated as outsiders.

    Everyone is now an outsider and outside the political process except party members and even then only those party members that suck up to the VIPs. Is this what we fight for?

    If this is the 2 party system that we are told has become our religion, then please shove it! We are fighting for the rakyat to be included in the political process, not just casting their votes every 5 years but intimately concerned and involved in fighting abuse and corruption in the bureaucracy as well as in state assemblies and parliament (don’t bother about the senate or the bar council which are just pieces of toothless rubbish).

    We are fighting for the empowerment of the people in improving their own society and fighting racism and abuse as well as crime and corruption. We do not need party men telling us we are outsiders and outside the political process. We do not need a 2 party system where one party is just as arrogant as the other and excludes the rakyat from being part of the political process. We do not need political parties that consider themselves as exclusive entities who are the experts and who have the divine right or the birth right to monopolise the political process – that they are the ones who will get everything fixed properly.

    We do not need a political system where party members protect each other after committing crimes just as we do not need a 2 party system where the political parties protect each other by keeping unjust laws to suppress honest activists and keep ordinary people outside the political process or call both ordinary people and non-party activists as outsiders.

    A New Dawn In Malaysia - Hopefully



    If the alternative coalition is not worth their salt, I am willing to bring back the previous administration. That is what happened to Taiwan. After kicking out the KMT and realising that the DPP is even worse that the one they replaced, the Taiwanese people decided to give the KMT another chance. True enough after eight years in political wilderness, the KMT re-invented themselves where they are brought back down to earth and engage the population with their more people-friendly policies.

    By MalaysiaFirst (Taiwan)

    The next general election, when called, is going to be a watershed election and may turn a new page in Malaysia’s history. It is now or never and the people have to decide whether they want to remain status quo or as cautioned by the current Prime Minister, take a gamble with our vote and hand the head of government to an alternative coalition that do not have any experience governing at the federal level.

    Already we have seen the bickering among the so-called coalition-of-willing. Do we trust they will govern up to our expectations? That is the sixty-four thousand dollar question.

    Changing of the guard naturally comes with high expectations, but at the same time, the new guards too marvel at the sudden power that is bestowed on them. What guarantee do we have that our new guardians will not be entrapped in the same failings as the administration they seek to replace?

    Considering that we already have fifty-three years of the same recipes, from the same kitchen, it might not be a bad idea after all to see a change of chefs. Yes there are risks but heck, if there are no changes, will there ever be any changes at all. Many a time our leaders have forewarned us not to gamble away our future. The irony is, will the future be better if we continue to stick with the current leaders whom we perceive to have failed us or throw our weight to new leaders who claim to be more capable and ready to lead? In Malaysia, I do not believe only the current government has capable politicians.

    Winning an election is one thing but governing is a totally different ball game altogether. We may want to take a leaf from Taiwan. After governing Taiwan since 1949, the Nationalist Party or Kuomintang (KMT) ceded power to the independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in the 2000 Presidential Election. The DPP swept into sudden power no thanks to the split among the ranks-and-files in the KMT but at the same time the Taiwanese were also fed up with their current government which had grown too arrogant, corrupt and out-of-touch with the common people. So the time was right to have a change of guard after fifty-one years which saw the deterioration of governance towards the tail-end of KMT rule. As I mentioned, with this change, comes high expectations. The DPP came into power campaigning on one key platform, to rid KMT of corrupt rule. We now know the rest of the story; the new power became even more corrupt than the old power. So, after being in the wilderness for so long, when one comes to power, one could not simply resist the taste, not to mention the temptation of power. The Taiwanese people learned their lesson and elected the KMT back to power in 2008 with a landslide victory.

    And if you think this is unique to Taiwan when there is a change of government, similarly in Japan it was no better when the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) fell to the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). Not only that, in just five short years, between the LDP and DPJ, Japan already has a change of six prime ministers and what followed is their roving door policies as termed by the media. Till today, Japan is still stuck in their economic doldrums. And our nearest neighbour Indonesia had high expectations too when President Yudhoyono took over from Golkar but his new administration was also beset with corruption practices and he was personally implicated but no charges could be proven.

    Still, I take my hat off to these countries whose citizens have the guts to make the change. Do you think Malaysian voters have what it takes to make the change? Yes and no. Yes for the educated and global-minded urbanites and no for the forever-comfort-zone rural population. The kampung people live and swear by the good patronage of the current government. The kampung folks are not interested in the big picture. Globalisation may be a buzz word for the young and mobile but is alien to the rural folks. The young generation may not live without internet access but the kampung folks get by with real-time gossip among themselves. The current government is too entrenched at the grassroots level of every kampung. So what if the urban elites are internet-savvy and are exposing the current governments’ wrong-doings in cyberspace, what counts is the number of kampung folks who are continuously latched and ‘trained’ to vote the current administration. Needless to say, our pakciks, makciks, apeks, ah-sohs, uncles and aunties outnumber the ultra-modern and cyber-surfing young Turks.

    Come GE13, will Malaysia wake up to a new dawn? Yes, momentum may be building in the opposition camps. And by the way, momentum is mass multiplied by velocity. I think we have the velocity with expose after expose daily in the cyber-space on the current administrations’ excesses. Unfortunately there is no mass because the audience, that is, potential voters, are confined to a small part of the society and not far-reaching enough that would turn the tide to the opposition camps. The battle ground is not in the cities but in kampungs and villages.

    Having said that, I am 100% for a change in government. I am willing to take the risk and gamble my future for the sake of my future generations. As in the case of Taiwan, Japan and Indonesia, it serves as a wake-up call to the current government not to take the people for granted (or should I say for a ride).

    I also believe there is no such thing as a perfect government. Whichever political parties that comes into power, we will eventually see abuses of power and corruption and all the ills of a governing party. The option before us given the current scenario is to simply choose the best among the worst.

    If the alternative coalition professes that they could govern better than the current slate of leaders, I am willing take a ride with them. If they think there are cleaner than the current politicians, I stand to be proven wrong. If they think they can make Malaysia a more just society, I stand to be convinced.

    And if the alternative coalition is not worth their salt, I am willing to bring back the previous administration. That is what happened to Taiwan. After kicking out the KMT and realising that the DPP is even worse that the one they replaced, the Taiwanese people decided to give the KMT another chance. True enough after eight years in political wilderness, the KMT re-invented themselves where they are brought back down to earth and engage the population with their more people-friendly policies.

    I wish our time will come too where we send the current government into reflection mode with the hope they too will re-invent themselves and serve the common rakyat, not to line their pockets with immoral wealth.

    I believe we can write a new chapter in Malaysian history when the next general election is called. It is not called a watershed election for nothing. This is the best opportunity that we have. The dawn of a new era is before us and we must convert this opportunity into a reality. With you and the rest of you who are reading and sharing this, together we can make history. Do it now!!

    Are you with me?

    100-day reforms: BN has lost and Pakatan deserves a chance

    by Mariam Mokhtar

    Malaysia Chronicle
    Thursday, 23 December 2010

    Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin scoffed at Pakatan’s 100-day reforms in the event that they formed the federal government and reminded the public ‘why BN has been in power for more than half a century and counting’.

    His shameless attempt to discredit Pakatan is an insult to the electorate. He said, “Pakatan can promise the sun, moon, stars and mountains… But that is not the way of the BN government. We cannot squander our nation’s wealth.”

    Muhyiddin is far removed from reality. People are disillusioned. After 53 years, the nation is more divided than ever, and our economy is in tatters. Our standards in education are falling, our defence budget is spiraling out of control and the civil service is bloated. The Prime minister’s residence and the King’s palace are undergoing a multi-million magical transformation whilst some people live without piped water and electricity.

    Does Muhyiddin still think the electorate deserves to give BN another chance? Is 53 years of failure not long enough?

    Muhyiddin said, “For BN, the prime minister has already a long road map for a high-income nation. But Pakatan only has plans for their first 100 days. They have absolutely no plans to reform the economy or anything.”

    Only a megalomaniac will equate ‘high-spending’ with ‘high-income’? The mega-projects that the Prime minister announced are mere monuments to vanity, to satisfy BN’s perverse ego that bigger is always better.

    The Pakatan led states of Penang and Selangor are examples of good governance and they have introduced younger voices to have a greater say in shaping policy On the other hand, BN’s talk sounds outdated and wearisome.

    Malaysia’s lack of political reforms means that our ranking in ‘The Democracy Index’ is 71 out of 167 countries. Ours is defined as a ‘flawed democracy’. The Economist Intelligence Unit which compiles this index bases its findings on electoral process and pluralism, civil liberties, functioning of government, political participation and political culture.

    Muhyiddin should realise that amongst other things, there is a restriction on our freedom of expression, the Internal Security Act is used to stifle criticism and university students are barred from participation in politics.

    Would the DPM care to come up with a similar package for reform because the only things most people remember from the BN convention are Najib’s four political diseases ‘inertia, delusion, amnesia and arrogance’. Besides, its 7-point charter lacked not just lustre but also substance.

    Unsurprisingly, Muhyiddin belittles not just the opposition, but also the public and companies. He said, “They probably think that the general election is close, so maybe they know better than us. They are just luring voters with their empty promises, like a supermarket sale.”

    Not content with insulting the electorate, our DPM must also ridicule the retailers. He believes that ‘supermarket sales’ are just a gimmick with ‘their empty promises’.

    One sincerely hopes the consortium of Malaysian retailers such as Giant, Tesco and Carrefour will protest at such a damaging charge.

    If Pakatan has to make good on its promises, as pledged in its 100-day reform, then it also faces a long, thankless slog repairing the damage and economic mess of 53 years of BN rule.

    Pakatan has dared to announce their reforms and it is for the electorate to choose if they are attractive enough for deciding their future.

    Has BN been as ambitious in its political reforms? As far as many can see, BN’s policies are more of the ‘same-old, same-old’.

    At least Pakatan leaders are on the right track. It has shown preparedness, clarity and bold vision for a better government. Who dares wins!

    Anwar: APCO row over accountability, not 1 Malaysia


    December 24, 2010

    Anwar accused the Najib administration of haphazard public spending in hiring APCO. — file pic
    KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 24 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim hit back today at the Najib administration over the APCO affair, saying the main issue was about accountability and due process in hiring the publicity strategist and not 1 Malaysia.

    The opposition leader has been suspended for six months from Parliament for linking Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s 1 Malaysia campaign to the One Israel concept via APCO Worldwide. The prime minister has denied the link, saying 1 Malaysia is his own creation.

    The PKR de facto leader said APCO’s involvement in the Najib administration was “clearest proof of Umno/Barisan Nasional’s hypocrisy”, and accused the latter of hiring a company that was “known for its strong link with the Israeli intelligence and political establishment” for communication work

    “Therefore, the bulk of my contention when I first raised this issue in Dewan Rakyat was directed at the prime minister’s hypocrisy and carelessness in hiring a firm with a track record such as APCO’s,” Anwar said in a statement released this morning.

    He added that Pakatan Rakyat (PR) MPs were entitled to ask the government to reveal “the extent of APCO’s involvement in the formulation of policies and messaging under the current prime minister”.

    The Permatang Pauh MP also claimed there were “numerous records available publicly to substantiate APCO’s unhealthy track record of working for regimes with penchant for stifling human rights and democratic space” and referred to articles written by Batu MP Chua Tian Chang.

    Najib has said 1 Malaysia was his idea.
    “Thus, the issue was never about the simplistic question of who came up with 1 Malaysia. It is about holding the government of the day accountable for its haphazard behaviour in spending the public money (to the tune of RM77 million for one year’s service) to hire a firm for its own image building.

    “More importantly, it is about the lack of responsibility of a prime minister in ignoring APCO’s track record and potential security risks posed by the latter,” he added.

    Anwar has attacked Umno and BN for not engaging PR on the issues, and charged the ruling coalition with going “on an overkill drive from the beginning which culminated in the suspension of four members of Dewan Rakyat recently.

    “It trampled on every known ethics and norms including the natural process of allowing an accused to present and argue his case before a fair and just panel,” he said, referring to the rights panel decision to deny his right to be heard.

    “In the end, UMNO/Barisan Nasional created another first in the history of Dewan Rakyat when it orchestrated our suspension without a debate and based on a simple letter of denial from APCO,” he added.

    Anwar also mocked BN’s assertion that APCO’s letter of denial and a statement from political strategist Robert M. Shrum was proof the public relations consultancy “was not involved in the conceptualisation of 1 Malaysia; neither was 1 Malaysia adopted from One Israel campaign.

    “Going by the same UMNO/Barisan Nasional’s logic, a statutory declaration made by P. Balasubramaniam on his allegation of the prime minister’s relationship with Altantuya Sharibu would have been taken as an undisputable proof.

    “Likewise, the two contracts signed by APCO with the governments of Malaysia and Israel respectively that are in my possession would have to be taken as an undisputable proof of a link between the 1 Malaysia campaign with other campaigns that APCO or its personnel had worked on previously,” he said.

    Anwar said the release of the two documents from APCO and Shrum was “nothing more than an orchestrated media play that ensures no scrutiny of the ‘evidence’ it claims to have”.

    “In the end, the country must go back to the fundamental questions that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is so keen to avoid,” he said, alluding to The Malaysian Insider’s report on July 28, 2009 which he said has never been denied.

    The report said APCO previously had an official based in Najib’s office and they had helped craft his 100 days strategy — including his 1 Malaysia message and other key platforms of his administration.

    “If this is indeed true, the prime minister must then be prepared to explain the other fundamental issue — his trigger happy attitude in using taxpayers’ money to hire a firm for the sole good of his party; especially one with such a questionable track record that could have compromised the country’s security,” Anwar said.

    The Exam Sham?


    By Syed Akbar Ali

    .

    Well its that time of the year again:

    • Best PMR results in four years
    • 30,863 out of 439,456 candidates scored straight As (7% got 8As)
    • fewer candidates this year (442,721 in 2009) more students scored straight As
    • 5,825 rural students scoring straight As
    • six subjects shown significant increase Bahasa Malaysia, English, Arabic, Mathematics, Science and Living Skills (agriculture).

    .

    Maybe with more hardwork, we will achieve 100,000 students getting straight As in a few years. Then we can really get into the Guinness Book of World Records. Somehow I really dont believe these figures are reflecting the true situation. I dont think we are being fair to our childrens future, their parents and to our country.

    .

    Firstly, can we please have the details for the exam scores? Is it a State secret? Is it an OSA or an ISA offence if the actual exam scores are made public? How many marks are needed to score a pass in the PMR for say Bahasa Malaysia? What about English? What is the passing mark for Matematik? Is it a state secret? ISA? OSA? Why is it a State secret?

    .

    And what are the minimum marks required to get an A for all the eight subjects in the PMR? Untuk mendapat A dalam Matematik, apakah markah minima yang perlu dicapai? Is there any type of discrimination at all in marking the exam papers? Can we have some simple honest answers?

    .

    Folks just 10 years ago, it was the 20th century. This is the 21st century and its 2010 already. We are 10 years away from 2020. Our grandkids may see the 22ndcentury its! not too far away. So can the Government please divulge full information about how these exam papers are graded? Bukan saja saya kurang yakin, but I think we are just fooling ourselves and damaging our childrens chances at a better future by not being forthright about how the exams are graded, the exam results and our entire education system.

    .

    I have my doubts about the grading system not just for the PMR but for the SPM too.My wife and I work with socially challenged children in the care of some childrens shelters. We coached a child who was seriously deficient in school work, as most of these kids are. Straight 0 scores or less than 10 marks in school exams were common. But come the PMR and our child passed all her eight subjects. We were happy but I must confess a little unexpectedly.

    .

    The fact is our university graduates are becoming increasingly unemployable. If the Government and the GLCs do not give them a job, it will be difficult for them to find work elsewhere. And few of them can start businesses on their own (other than jual burger). Here is another true story a graduate trainee was told to copy a Price Tag and make twelve copies of it. It had to be written by hand. There was a small typo in the original tag, which had been scratched out and written over. The brilliant university grad produced twelve new tags, complete with the typo intact and rewritten over twelve times !

    .

    I think kita mabuk syok sendiri saja dapat. 8A, 21A, 75A tapi anak-anak kita masih tak boleh buat kerja yang simple, tak faham apa pun pasal hal dunia dan akan terus bergantung kepada Kerajaan untuk sara hidup.

    .

    And what about other countries? Can we get some comparisons? The Singaporeans are cleverer than us ! (sorry b ut its true). In their O Levels how many kids get straight As for all subjects as a percentage of total students taking the O Levels. 1000? 2,000? 10,000? How do we compare? If 40,000 or 50,000 of our kids can get straight As for all subjects because our kids are smarter, bagus lah. Very good. But how come our kids cannot even do simple jobs or even get proper jobs? And as a nation, Vietnam will soon be passing us in economic growth and development. Indonesia is getting organized too. Maybe with their 8As and 21As, our kids will one day look for jobs at jobstreetdotcomdotindon ?

    .

    Jangan main-main atau permainkan masa depan generasi muda kita. We cannot lull the people with false hopes, false achievements, 30,000 straight As and so on when we know our young kids are way below par in the competitive sweepstakes. We have to benchmark our young kids with the best in the world. We cannot just adopt the jaguh kampong approach just to make people feel good about the 30,000 straight As. We want to be a negara maju in just 10 years. We must start benchmarking ourselves with the negara maju starting from yesterday.

    .

    Do the Negara maju produce 30,000 kids getting straight As? Here are Singapore's 'O' Level resutls (Jan 2010):

    .

    O level results out: top student from CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School11 Jan 2010

    The GCE 'O' level results are out, and this year's top student is Lai Kai Rou from CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School, with 10 A1s. And the school had more reason to cheer. Of the 44 students in Singapore that scored 9 A1s, about one third or 13 students, were from the school.

    Crescent Girls' School also produced a bumper crop, with 8 students scoring 9 A1s. Overall, some 37,400 students sat for the 'O' level examinations last year and about 81 percent scored 5 or more O level passes. This is simil! ar to la st year's 80.8 percent.

    .

    So in Singapore only one student got 10As in the 'O' Levels results announced in January 2010. 44 other students got 9As in their 'O' Levels.

    .

    (Folks I have deleted the reference from the New Daily Star - which is a Bangladeshi newspaper, and not a UK paper. Silap saya. But even in Bangladesh only TWO students achieved all As in the 'O' Level exams)

    .

    In Malaysia we have hundreds of students if not thousands of students who get all As. Jadi siapa tipu siapa?

    .

    What can I say : their students are not as smart as our kids.


    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Hindraf: Boycott Pakatan ?

    Hindraf urges Indians to abstain from voting in GE

    By Athi Shankar

    GEORGE TOWN: Ethnic Malaysian Indians should abstain from voting in the 13th general election unless the constituency offers a candidate from the Human Rights Party (HRP), which is the the political axis of Hindraf Makkal Sakti, said its chairman P Waythamoorthy.

    London-based Waythamoorthy said it was time for ethnic Indian voters across the country to teach existing political blocks – Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat - a lesson in electoral politics.

    Accusing both BN and Pakatan of duping Indian voters, he said both blocks had a similar political agenda and attitude towards the Indian community in the country.

    "They want Indians to support them merely to win election, after which the community is abandoned, deserted and forsaken like a trash bin.

    “When they (Indians) abstain, both winners and losers would know the results were owed to ethnic Indian boycott.

    “Only then both BN and Pakatan will realise and comprehend the value of Indian voters in their quest for political power,” he told FMT.

    Waythamoorthy brushed aside suggestions that a boycott would undermine Indian political strength and importance in future.

    “I disagree. A boycott will indeed strengthen the Indian political bargain for the following election,” he said.

    He said Hindraf was not fighting for short political gains but were committed to ending all types of discrimination and marginalisation against the minority ethnic Indians.

    “We are seeking for far reaching long term gains and benefits for the community,” he said.

    He pointed out that Hindraf proved a political point on block-voting in the last general election when it called on and campaigned successfully for ethnic Indians to vote for Pakatan.

    “Heeding to our call, an overwhelming Indian voters backed Pakatan then.

    “But like their BN counterparts for past 53 years, Pakatan leaders and elected representatives have all been ungrateful.

    “They have neglected and ignored the interests, rights and benefits of Indian community at their perils.

    “Hence, there is no reason for Indians to back any of them," he said.

    No freebies

    He said this time around Hindraf would not serve anymore free lunches for any political coalitions.

    Waythamoorthy, who is a lawyer by profession, said that when the next election comes Hindraf would mobilise its supporters to campaign and achieve its electoral goal.

    “It's time for Indians to vote for themselves, that is for HRP candidates, who are committed to their cause,” stressed Waythamoorthy.

    HRP's supremo P Uthayakumar, the fiery elder brother of Waythamoorthy, has declared that HRP would contest in 15 designated parliamentary and 38 state seats.

    “In other seats, we will be call on to campaign for Indians to abstain from for either BN or Pakatan,” said Waythamoorthy.

    Waythamoorthy left the country for London during the police crackdown on Hindraf leaders in the aftermath of the famous Nov 25 ethnic Indian rally in Kuala Lumpur in 2007.

    That rally has been hailed by many political observers as the catalyst that triggered the political tsunami in 2008 general election.

    Since leaving the country, Waythamoorthy has been shuttling around the globe for two years to garner international support for Hindraf's struggle for the betterment of ethnic Malaysian Indians.

    He has been living under British political asylum since his Malaysian international passport was revoked by the Home Ministry two years ago.

    'Who is Najib kidding with minimal impact price hikes?'


    By FMT Staff

    KUALA LUMPUR: When one is earning RM3,000 a month, with no extra mouths to feed and cloth, single and live at home with parents with no housing and car loans to cover, a 20 sen increase in your favourite 'teh tarik' or Milo is quite insignificant.

    Now substitute this with a 'real life scenario' of 'married with kids' to feed and cloth, insurance, car, housing and credit card loans to cover, you'll feel the pinch.

    This is the type of scenario that DAP is spewing about.

    The average household income in Malaysia in 2007 was slightly over RM3,500 a month. The take-home pay after mandatory deductions in such a scenario would in all probability be about RM3,100.

    Now minus a car, housing and creditcard loan, this individual is poor by urban standards and a 55% hike in a consumer item will definetly hurt the household budget!

    Which incidently is exactly what has happened since January 2010, according to DAP's national publicity chief Tony Pua.

    The cost of white sugar, which is a core consumer item on every household list, has gone up 55%.

    In July, the government launched a surprise “5-in-1” price hike programme, raising the prices of RON95 and RON97 petrol, diesel, white sugar and liquified petroluem gas (LPG) including cooking gas cyclinders as much as 15.2%.

    "Then on Dec 3, 2010, less than 5 months later, they had another series of hikes.

    "This time the price of RON95 went up five sen to RM1.90 per litre, diesel by five sen per litre to RM1.80 and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) by five sen to RM1.90 per kg. Sugar was now RM2.10 per kg.

    "In fact for white sugar, inclusive of a 20 sen hike in January on top of the 25 sen and 20 sen hike in July and December, prices have increased by more than 55% this year alone," said Pua.

    Failed maths

    He said the Kuala Lumpur & Selangor Coffee Shop Association's recent announcement debunked Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's claim in July that the price increases will have “minimal impact” on households in Malaysia.

    The association had announced a proposed 20 sen increase in beverage prices.

    "In July, Pemandu said the new teh tarik price, having taken into impact the subsidy reduction of fuel and upward price adjustment would be around RM1.0155. They advertised this in full page advertisements across all major mainstream newspapers.

    "But in reality the 'teh tarik' and 'kopi susu' price was RM1.20. Now with the 20 cent increase these beverages will go up even higher," he said.

    According to Pua something is seriously wrong with the method used in calculating matters involving our economy and our leadership's understanding of simple arithmetics.

    "Someone in Pemandu has failed their mathematics. Firstly, there is a clear contradiction in “teh tarik” prices between the fact sheet issued in July which was only RM1.00 as compared to the new base price of RM1.20 in the December fact sheet.

    "The government must explain the “mysterious” 20% increase in the base price between July and December, " he said.

    He also accused Barisan Nasional and Pemandu of "living in a parallel imaginary universe" of price hikes involving increases of 1.55 sen or even 1 sen.

    "I had issued a statement in July arguing that Pemandu should be “commended” for the audacity to publish such numbers which are at best applicable only in a fictitious and theoretical universe, and at worse, showing the complete lack of understanding of real world market dynamics on the price of goods and services.

    "And to prove my point, it was reported yesterday in all major Chinese newspapers that the Kuala Lumpur & Selangor Coffee Shop Association has announced the proposal to increase all beverage prices by 20 sen starting Jan 1, 2011.

    "Kopi susu and the milk prices will be increased from RM1.20 to RM1.40 translating to a massive 16.7% increase in prices!" said Pua.

    Stop spewing hypothetics

    He said even the price of everyone's coffeeshop favourite “herbal tea” will be increased from RM1.10 to RM1.30 which is an 18% price hike.

    "And Pemandu has the audacity to claim that “herbal tea” prices will only increase from RM1.00 to RM1.012 or just a 1.2% increase

    "In fact, out of the 70 everyday food and drink items listed on the Subsidy Rationalisation fact sheet, no item is expected to increase by more than 1.9% after the most recent round of price hikes!

    "What is perhaps most embarrassing is for the Domestic Trade, Cooperatives and Consumerism Deputy Minister Tan Lian Hoe to argue that a 10 sen increase in beverage prices “will be more reasonable”.

    "A 10 sen increase will still result in a 8.3% increase for the price of “teh tarik” and “kopi susu”, 10 times higher than the 0.83% increase claimed by Pemandu.

    "The government should stop spewing these ridiculous and out-of-these-world hypothetical data which demonstrate at best its sheer incompetence and irrelevance," Pua said.

    Poor gets poorer in Sabah with price hikes

    By Luke Rintod

    KOTA KINABALU: In Malaysia's capital city Kuala Lumpur where salaries are higher, a 55% increase in white sugar price may dent the pocket but in Sabah's vastly rural interior it could mean having to go without.

    That is the direct impact of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's recent price hike on fuel and sugar. The price increases will plunge the poorest state in Malaysia into further abyss.

    For the 40% of Malaysia's poorest people who are centred in Sabah, small 'luxuries' such as sugar, oil and milk or a hot meal in the local coffee shop is now not a matter of "can I afford it."

    They simply cannot afford it. The recent announcement of price increases in food and beverage items by the association of coffee shops operators simply means the regular 'teh tarik' is a luxury.

    Sabah incidently has among the highest cost of living in Malaysia. The additional increase in prices of consumer items will further cripple livelihoods here.

    The increases are a direct chain effect of the federal government's decision to impose 'minimal impact' increase in the price of fuel and sugar.

    A recent DAP survey of Sabahans living in interior was received with angry respone.

    Said Sabah DAP Parliamentary Liaison Chief for the Interior, Dr Benjamin Yapp: "We received so many complaints from people in the interior about once affordable goods now being too expensive for them.

    "There are now signs of increasing poverty springing up everywhere especially in the interior, as well as in urban areas of Sabah.

    "Poor parents, especially in the interior find it increasingly difficult to feed their families due to the increase in prices of foods and other consumer goods.

    "How do we expect to eradicate poverty by end of this year, 2010, as declared by the government, when the majority of the people, especially the poor became poorer and poorer by the day?" he said.

    Yapp argued that there was no logic to claim that Sabah's poverty index had improved when basic infrastructure and public amenities in the rural areas continued to be neglected.

    'They (BN government) keep saying they are spending billions of ringgit for rural infrastructure development.

    "But the roads are still bad and there's no infrastructures. Dilapidated public amenities and lack of treated piped water are the landmarks in Sabah's interior.

    "They continued to plague our people especially the poor natives," he said.

    Yapp noted that the party's wide-spread survey had also recorded growing poverty.

    "DAP mobile service team's surveys in several districts around the state have found disturbing evidence of growing poverty even among those living in the urban and sub-urban areas.

    "The surveys revealed that poverty in the interior were further compounded by high incidences of unemployment, retrenchment, lack of opportunities, bad business, sickness and old aged," he said.

    Also read:

    'Who is Najib kidding with minimal impact price hikes?'

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...