Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Johor PKR marred by Azmin-Zaid Rivalry

November 13, 2010

www.malaysiakini.com

Terence Netto reports: Johor PKR marred by Azmin-Zaid Rivalry

By now the damaging effects of the contest for deputy president of PKR have become fairly evident but in the Johor chapter, this has impacted with a perversity that exposes the gap between party aspiration and reality.

Though the contest has now been rendered moot by Zaid Ibrahims withdrawal, its lingering ill-effects persist. And in Johor they combine to weaken a party that would ordinarily be expected to struggle against opponents who have history and sentiment in their favour.

Johor, the birthplace of UMNO, is a BN bastion that yielded little to the political tsunami which swept the peninsula in March 2008.

In that poll, UMNO-BNs strength stanched the opposition-favouring tide elsewhere, leaving PKR fruitless, and only conceding one parliamentary and two state seats to the DAP, and one state ward to PAS.

The fact that PKR were left barren made it all the more pressing this party with pretensions to take over Putrajaya in cahoots with DAP and PAS, does better at the next general election, which is expected much sooner than its due date in 2013. Some say it would be held as early as April.

It cant be that a PKR-led opposition coalition sweeps or edges into power depending on whom you talk to with not one parliamentary or state picking from Johor.

That would be an outcome of particular chagrin to a party confident of its nationwide appeal on account of the popularity of its fight for justice for all Malaysians.

After dithering for some time on who should lead the state PKR chapter, Chua Jui Meng, the former MCA vice-president and cabinet minister, was finally named as liaison chief.

PKR central did not see fit that because Johor is an UMNO bastion, a Malay leader should be appointed to head the state chapter and Chua, in deference to his standing as an MCA heavyweight of yore, would be better positioned as overall advisor.

No, PKR thought it fit to test the notion that a Chinese leader could lead the electoral battle in an UMNO bastion, a salutary play against type that can and should be expected of a party out to unscramble the racial stereotyping that is UMNO-BNs entrenched legacy.

But what began as an endeavour in contravening racial typecasting was soon contaminated by other cataracts politics is prey to.

The Peacemaker

Chua Jui Meng would be wont to support Zaid Ibrahim in the latters battle to be party No 2. Both are lawyers who in their past incarnations in BN components tended to break free of the sectarianism native to their original parties.

Their winding-up in PKR is the logical culmination of their liberal inclinations, constrained within their race-based parties of origin but given free vent once they joined the new kid on the political block.

It was Chuas liberalism that saw him muster the candor to tell Anwar Ibrahim that the restive forces for change in Sabah regarded Dr Jeffery Kitingan as their leader, a fact that Anwar and his lieutenant, Azmin Ali, are loath to acknowledge.

Zaid was already on to the fact in October last year when a crisis broke out in Sabah in which Jeffery was not named by PKR central as leader; instead someone more amenable to Azmin was preferred.

Chuas assessment of the situation on the ground factored critically in a compromise worked out in December which saw Jeffery appointed overall strategist for Sabah and Sarawak.

Again it was Chuas persuasion that moved Anwar to back away from a move a few months a! go to su spend 12 divisional leaders in the Sabah chapter, the threat of suspension having been mysteriously revived after the compromise of last December had intimated action would not be taken against the erring 12 for having made a move to register Parti Cinta Sabah.

This is a convoluted story, best understood as a proxy battle waged between pro-Jeffery and anti-Jeffery forces, the latter aligned to Azmin and the former inclined to back Zaid because his liberalism favoured the smoldering discontent of the Kadazan-Dusun-Murut community. Chua was not far behind Zaid in sympathy to this cause.

But once he was named liaison chief for Johor, Chuas course began to be influenced by the side he chose to back in the battle for the PKR No 2 post.

PKR secretary left out

He called Saiman Marjuki on the phone and, according to the Johor PKR secretary, told him that Anwar wanted the state to throw its support behind Azmin. I dont know if he had the permission of Datuk Seri Anwar to say what he said to me but I felt he was improperly using his position to campaign for Azmin, said Saiman, who elected to back Zaid, in an interview with Malaysiakini in Kluang yesterday.

Saiman, chief of the Sembrong division, is regarded in Johor PKR as a consensus seeker acceptable to all factions. He was left out of the line-up that Jui Meng announced after his purported attempt to influence the vote for Azmin had failed to move the chapters secretary.

Saiman went public with his criticism of Chua that faulted the liaison chief for not being consultative and for behaving, of all things, like a BN warlord. Of course, the mainstream media lapped up the criticism, as they would any ructions in Pakatan parties.

Saiman also claimed that 18 of the 24 properly constituted PKR divisions in Johor did not favour Chuas non-consultative style.

Last Thursday, Chua countered Saimans claims by telling an assembly of state divisional le! aders in Pulai, in the presence of Anwar, Azmin and other national leaders of PKR, that he had the support of all 24 divisions and that his line-up, minus Saiman, was widely endorsed.

To underscore the point, he said the news that five members of the Sembrong division had left the party, presumably out of sympathy for the left-out Saiman, who was absent at the meeting, was offset by 121 new members from the same division.

At the meeting in Pulai, Anwar praised Chua for declining to fight for a position in the national hierarchy of the party. He made it sound that Chua was more interested in party positions that mattered for PKRs overall advancement like the betterment of its standing in Johor than in merely personal advancement.

Anwar made Chuas choice not to stand sound principled when it could have been due to realistic acknowledgement of his chances vis--vis another power baron in PKR, Tian Chua, who would want to keep him out of the national hierarchy.

The decision to allow a contest for deputy president to proceed has had damaging effects on the party that will linger till the next general election.


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

MCA wants clear laws on faith conversions for children


By Melissa ChiNovember 13, 2010

Loh (centre) says the law should be ammended to allow children to keep their original faith until they can decide on their own if one of their parents convert to Islam. Picture by Jack OoiKUALA LUMPUR, Nov 13 The MCA has demanded amendments to allow children to keep their original faith until they can decide on their own if one of their parents convert to Islam, in the aftermath of several cases recently.

The countrys top court yesterday unanimously dismissed S. Shamalas bid to raise her two young children as Hindus, after she questioned their conversion to Islam by her estranged Hindu-turned-Muslim husband eight years ago.

MCA deputy publicity chief, Loh Seng Kok said the law should be amended to specifically provide that in the event both parents cannot agree on the childs faith, then it should remain status quo until the child reaches the age of maturity.

The government must act forthwith to table to Parliament the necessary amendments to the various laws to give effect to the Cabinet decision of 23 April 2009 that if one spouse embraces Islam, the children should follow the faith that the parents agreed on at the time of marriage or implied by their common religion, Loh said in a statement.

He said the law is consistent and complies with the Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women (Cedwa).

Such amendments if passed by Parliament would go a long way to fortify the 1 Malaysia spirit and intent, he added.

The MCA man also said that the five issues raised by Shamala should be addressed by the court.

MCA believe that whilst the Court was constrained, the Judges could have at least attempted to provide their views on the issues referred to them by way of obiter dictum. Although the views if expressed, would not be a binding precedent, they would provide clear guidance! to lowe r courts and litigants as well as other stakeholders, he said.

He claimed the court was unable and unwilling to address the five issues and suggested that the Parliament review laws relevant to this matter, particularly Section 5 of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1961.

Yesterdays 5-0 ruling effectively deals a hard blow to the battle to end one-sided religious conversions, which has caused a deep rift in this multicultural and secular nation but where Islam is recognised as the official creed.

The panel of five of the nations most senior judges, led by Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi, ruled that Shamala must return to the country if she wants the courts protection.

The 38-year-old mother fled the country with her two sons in 2004. Their current location is unknown.

The other four judges had ruled to have Shamalas challenge thrown out with immediate effect, without hearing the five constitutional questions she had raised.

The five questions are as follows:

1. Whether section 95 (b) of the Administration of Islamic Law (Federal Territories) Act 1993 is ultra vires of Article 12 (4) of the Federal Constitution (specifically concerning the right to determine the religion of the children under the age of 18 shall be determined by the parent or guardian) and Article 8 regarding equality rights?

2. Whether the same section in state law is inconsistent with federal law, namely section 5(1) of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1961, and is therefore invalid?

3. Regarding Article 121 (1A) of the Federal Constitution, where a custody order of children is made which court, between the Syariah Court or the High Court, is the higher authority?

4. When there is conversion of children of a civil marriage to Islam by one parent without the consent of the other, are the rights of remedy for the non-Muslim parent vested in the High Court?

5. Does the Syariah Court have jurisdiction to determine the validity of conversion of a minor into Islam once it h! ad been registered by the Registrar of Muallafs?

The Federal Territory Islamic Council was also a party to the suit, and had sided with the father for his rights as a Muslim to be upheld. - Malaysian Insider


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

I'll Vote For BN

Gotcha!!! Sorry I lied, but I know that statement will burn your ass and youll sit up and read this because you want to know who that sweetheart is who said Ill vote for BN. You see, Ive been thinking about some heavy stuff lately and I need you to help me find some answers. Dont mind? OK, and to REALLY make myself listen to your advice, Ill need you to pretend like youre my personal shrink and Im here to sort out some very messy thoughts and then you can advise me just like some smart-ass shrink I see in the movies. Can you do that? Good. So, lets start



Me: Hi Shrink!

You: Hi ST how have you been keeping lately?

Me: Not so good. Recently, Ive been thinking of migrating to Australia with the family.

You: Australia? Wow! Beautiful place. I love Perth. But why are you leaving?

Me: (Sigh) Dont ask laheverything seems to be going wrong here!

You: Like?

Me: Havent you been reading whats on the Internet lately?

You: Oh, you mean the gossip about Paris Hilton is it?

Me: No, its about the coming general election! Its so confusing. Tell me, which party should I vote for?

You: Thats for you to decide, not me ST.

Me: Why not? Youre my shrinkI pay you to give me answers about things that are bugging me.

You: I answered you already ST. Thats for you to decide; and thats my answer.

Me: I have to give it to youyoure goodanswering a question without really answering it

You: Well, I learnt it from the politicians. I observe how they lie, I mean talk

Me: Really? Like how?

You: Well, you know, theyll say one thing and mean another thing most of the time.

Me: Not me, Im a man of my word. Otherwise, I wont have married my wife! (giggles)

You: Not only that, today theyll say one thing, tomorrow, theyll say something else.

Me: Ya lahwe cannot trust politicians; uh-uhthey think! were fo ols or what!!

You: Well, as a matter of fact we are. Malaysians are fools and our politicians know that.

Me: Huh? You mean Ive been paying 300 bucks an hour sitting here talking to a fool? Hello?

You: See? You are already a bigger fool for paying meLOL! But seriously, Malaysians are fools.

Me: Now, please explain to me why you say Malaysians are fools. I dont get it

You: Let me put it this waydo you think the Americans, Europeans, and Japanese are smart people?

Me: Welltheir economies are stronger than ours, their currencies strongerOK, Ill buy that.

You: And not only thatthey invent so many things that we use today, so they must be smart

Me: Hmmcome to think of it, if these people never existed, my house would be very empty

You: So, tell me, why do they always change their government every now and then?

Me: Maybe thats because their previous government didnt do a good job

You: Aha!!! So they change their government because they think that they have done a bad job right?

Me: Of course. If my staff did a bad job Ill sack him. No question about it.

You: So, do you think BN has done a good job, a lousy job or deserved to be sacked?

Me: BN!! I wont even let them clean my toilet!! !@#$@#%&!@#!!!

You: Then WTF! How come theyre still running the country after more than 50 years!!?

Me: Well...maybe Malaysians are afraid of change

You: Afraid of change!!? Hello? Just look at the number of divorces in Malaysia!!!

Me: So how come theyre still running the country when theyve done such a bad job?

You: Read my lipsEuropeans are smart. Malaysians are fools!! THATS WHY!!

Me: Youre right man, must change the government just like the Europeans. They fark up we throw them out. Its time to kick some assbloody hell, screw me until I want to leave my country! Shit!

You: Feeling better now?

Me: I feel great! You are good huhI feel excited alreadycant wait for the general ! election !

You: So still thinking of migrating?

Me: Me? What for? BN should be migrating, not me!!! They should migrate to Timbuktu!!

You: OK, STyour sessions over. How shall I bill you?

Me: Bill it to my wifeshe asked me to come and learn to behave like a good boy

You: Shes smart. Women always pretend to be stupid, but theyre actually smarter than men.

Written by StraightTa
lking
StraightTalking is simply a regular reader/commenter who sees things as it is beneath all the noise and chatter and says it straight without any pretensions.

courtesy of masterwordsmith
See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Tengku Adnan: Umno will not accept Zaid back

PUTRAJAYA: Umno will not accept back former Minister in a Prime Minister's Department Zaid Ibrahim into a party, Umno secretary-general Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said.

Zaid, you have diminished him. Why should you take him back?," he said when asked upon Zaid's chance should he wish to lapse to Umno's fold.

"He will additionally give us problems. We don't like to have people who give problems. We wish people who join a party, a Barisan Nasional (BN) member parties, to understand a celebration struggle, not those who wish to aspire to their own interests," he told reporters after opening a crowd day for Kemas kindergartens in Putrajaya here today.

Last November 8, Zaid announced his withdrawal as a candidate for PKR deputy president's post as well as abdication from all celebration posts following allegation that there was no transparency in a celebration election.

However, Zaid, who was diminished from Umno in Dec 2008 as well as afterwards assimilated PKR 6 months later, has yet to voice his intention to lapse to Umno's fold.

There have only been reports of his intention to form a brand new party.

- Bernama


'Stop cheating': PKR protesters want polls halted

By G Vinod

PETALING JAYA: About 80 people turned up during a PKR headquarters here currently in a bid to vigour a celebration care to hindrance a ongoing celebration choosing allegedly injured by irregularities.

The throng arrived during about 10.30am, led by former PKR emissary presidential aspirant P Jenapala as well as former Kota Raja multiplication chief, KS Kotappan. They demanded which a argumentative celebration polls be halted as well as restarted from a multiplication turn itself.

We want a executive choosing committee (CEC) to stop a celebration polls. If it continues, it will meant which a celebration is intrigue a public, pronounced Kotappan.

Kotappan claimed there were discrepancies in a last electoral list, which valid a existence of haunt voters.

The same haunt voters will be choosing by casting votes again for a executive care election, he said.

He combined which it was astray which a celebration was still going by with a polls as a CEC has dangling a formula from multiform divisions.

There competence be others who have been meddlesome to run for executive care positions. How have been they going to nominate their possibilities now?he asked.

When asked whether he concluded with supreme council member Zaid Ibrahim's new outbursts upon celebration de facto leader, Anwar Ibrahim, as well as an additional emissary presidential hopeful, Azmin Ali, Kotappan pronounced there competence be a little truth in it.

Zaid is a smart man. we am sure there is truth in his claims, he said.

On Nov 8, Zaid pulled out from a emissary presidential race in criticism against a purported electoral irregularities. He blamed Anwar as well as Azmin for a electoral melee as well as urged them to step down.

'No such position'

Kotappan's sentiments were echoed by Jenapala, who pronounced Anwar had no right to interfere in a choosing process.

There is no such in front of called a de facto personality in a celebration as well as he should not get concerned in celebration affairs, pronounced Jenapala.

He additionally urged celebration boss Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail to step forward to end a electoral fiasco.

However, if she wants to remain at a back of her husband's (Anwar) shadows, afterwards she is not fit as well (to lead), pronounced Jenapala.

On Zaid's new outbursts, he pronounced he cannot censure a former law apportion as he was additionally aware of a purported manipulation in a celebration polls.

So far, 162 complaints had been filed though nothing of them had been investigated, claimed Jenapala.

Meanwhile, a group of youths claiming to be PKR members, pronounced they did not know because they were brought to a celebration headquarters.

All we know was which someone called Anand asked me to tag along with a crowd, claimed R Logan, 19, who was joined by his friend, S Yuganathan 19.

Kamisah Ripin, 75, additionally pronounced she has no idea what a criticism was all about, as well as which she came just to show support.

They told me to come show 'support'. So we came along, pronounced Kamisah.

When queried upon a matter, Jenapala pronounced whilst there competence be a little people planted in a crowd, roughly everybody knew because they participated in a protest.

Maybe they were not briefed earlier though they have been all PKR members, claimed Jenapala.

The throng dispersed peacefully during about twelve noon.


Majority Should Be Considerate


Conversion is so very sensitive in this country, yet during the week when Hindus are celebrating the auspicious festival of Deepavali, the message from our national film production development board, FINAS, is an advertisement glamourising a Hindu who converted to Islam ... showing the Muslim wife of a Hindu convert not wanting to eat food at the table of her non-Muslim in-laws. What exactly is the meaning of this advertisement here, if not to belittle the Hindus?

By Datuk A.Vaithilingam

Recent actions or utterences by politicians and public servants belonging to a section of the majority community in this country of ours have been most insensitive, hurting the feelings of the minority. Can it be thoughtlessness or is it a feeling of superiority by some who feel they are above the law?

We already know of cases when some members of the teaching profession lost their cool and made racial and slanderous remarks to belittle our young and taint their young minds. I suppose not punishing these professionals (who, legally, seemed to have infringed the Sedition Act) has resulted in others of the same profession continuing to taunt minorities!

Civil servants who continue to slander other Malaysians, especially from minority ethnic groups, only face the sanction of being 'investigated' with some minor internal transfers. The negligence by the Government leadership to take decisive action to give clear signals that such insensitive actions are unacceptable, has created a perception that slander of this nature is condoned, thus giving freedom to other civil servants to go ahead with remarks against the defenceless.

Dato Seri Zahid has been quite popular with the substantial number of Indian voters in Hutan Melintang and Bagan Dato areas. Until his recent statements questioning the patriotism of non-Malay Malaysians. ! Was he j ust careless or was this deliberate? Now, he has no choice but to withdraw the statement and apologise to the Chinese and Indian communities to regain their confidence.

Religion has similar majority control treatment. Although the BN and PR governments have generally stopped demolishing temples, the 'Little Pharoahs' ie civil servants of local councils have had their ways demolishing places of worship, with no regard for sensitivities of the worshippers in these communities, such as in the recent case of the Hindu temple in Puchong.

Conversion is so very sensitive in this country, yet during the week when Hindus are celebrating the auspicious festival of Deepavali, the message from our national film production development board, FINAS, is an advertisement glamourising a Hindu who converted to Islam. This advertisement was repeatedly highlighted and telecast in Astro and RTM. The storyline of this advertisement is most insulting to Hindus in general, even to the extent of showing the Muslim wife of a Hindu convert not wanting to eat food at the table of her non-Muslim in-laws. What exactly is the meaning of this advertisement here, if not to belittle the Hindus?

A government agency fined TV3 over a Hari Raya Aidil Fitri message which was said to be offensive to Muslims. Why has nothing been done to Finas and the media concerned for this offensive advertisement against Hindus?

1Malaysia as envisaged by our Prime Minister pledges to look into and serve all the different ethnic and religious groups as people of one Malaysia.

In a democracy it is the duty of the majority to protect and look after the interests of the minority.

I have my doubts if this is happening. I sincerely hope that leaders of the majority community would be more considerate in their actions.

There is still hope.

By Datuk A.Vaithilingam

Petaling Jaya

- Former President Malaysia Hindu Sangam
- Former Chairman, Malaysian Consultative Council on Buddhism, Christianity,! Hinduis m, Sikhism & Taoism (MCCBCHST)


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Japans Options

November 13, 2010

Japans Options

by Professor Joseph S. Nye

TOKYO The current tensions between China and Japan have revived talk about how far Japan has fallen since its glory years of the 1980s. To the extent that this sense of decline is grounded in reality, can Japan recover?

Japans economy has suffered two decades of slow growth because of the poor policy decisions that followed the collapse of the countrys massive asset-price bubble in the early 1990s. In 2010, Chinas economy surpassed Japans in total size, though it is only one-sixth the size in per capita terms. In 1988, eight of the top ten companies in the world by market capitalization were Japanese; today, none is.

But, despite its recent poor performance, Japan retains impressive power resources. It possesses the worlds third largest national economy, sophisticated industries, and the best-equipped conventional military forces among Asian countries.

Only two decades ago, many Americans feared being overtaken after Japanese per capita income surpassed that of the United States. Books predicted a Japanese-led Pacific bloc that would exclude the US, and even an eventual war between the two countries. Futurologist Herman Kahn forecast that Japan would become a nuclear superpower, and that the transition in Japans role would be like the change brought about in European and world affairs in the 1870s by the rise of Prussia.

These views extrapolated an impressive Japanese record. Today, however, they serve as a useful reminder about the danger of linear projections based on rapidly rising power resources.

On the eve of World War II, Japan accounted for 5% of the worlds industrial production. Devastated by the war, it did not regain that level until 1964. From 1950 to 1974, Japan averaged a remarkable 10% annual growth ! rate, an d by the 1980s was the worlds second largest national economy, accounting for 15% of global output.

Japan also became the worlds largest creditor and largest donor of foreign aid. Its technology was roughly equal to that of the US and even slightly ahead in some manufacturing branches. Japan armed itself only lightly (restricting military expenditures to about 1% of GNP), and focused on economic growth.

This was not the first time that Japan had impressively reinvented itself. A century and a half ago, Japan became the first non-Western country to adapt successfully to modern globalization. After centuries of isolation, Japans Meiji restoration chose selectively from the rest of the world, and within 50 years the country had become strong enough to defeat a European great power, in the Russo-Japanese War.

Can Japan reinvent itself again? In 2000, a prime ministers commission on Japans goals in the twenty-first century called for just that. Little has happened. Given economic stagnation, the political systems weaknesses, the aging of the population, and resistance to immigration, fundamental change will not be easy.

But Japan retains a high standard of living, a highly skilled labor force, a stable society, and areas of technological and manufacturing leadership. Moreover, its culture (both traditional and popular), overseas development assistance, and support of international institutions provide resources for soft, or attractive, power.

But it seems unlikely that a revived Japan, a decade or two hence, could become a global challenger economically or militarily, as was predicted two decades ago. Roughly the size of California, Japan will never have the geographical or demographic scale of China or the US. And its soft power is undercut by ethnocentric attitudes and policies.

Some Japanese politicians talk about revising Article 9 of the constitution, which restricts Japans forces to self defense, and a few have spoken of nuclear armament. Both! seem un wise and unlikely now.

Alternatively, if Japan were to ally with China, the two countries combined resources would make for a potent coalition. In 2006, China became Japans largest trade partner, and the new government formed by the Democratic Party of Japan in 2009 sought improved bilateral relations.

But an alliance also seems unlikely. Not only have the wounds of the 1930s failed to heal, but China and Japan have conflicting visions of Japans proper place in Asia and the world. For example, China has blocked Japans efforts to become a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

More recently, after Japanese maritime officials arrested a Chinese fishing-boat captain near the disputed Senkaku islands, China responded harshly with arrests of Japanese businessmen, cancelation of student visits, and suspension of exports of rare-earth minerals upon which key Japanese industries depend.

Chinas actions shocked many Japanese and undercut its soft power in Japan. As one Japanese professor put it, in football terms, China scored an own goal. In the highly unlikely prospect that the US were to withdraw from the East Asian region, Japan might join a Chinese bandwagon, but Japan is more likely to maintain its American alliance to preserve its independence from China.

The main danger for Japan today is a tendency to turn inward, rather than becoming a global civilian power that realizes its great potential to produce global public goods. For example, Japans aid budget has declined, and only half as many Japanese students study overseas as did two decades ago. An inward-looking Japan would be a loss for the entire world.

Joseph Nye, a former US Assistant Secretary of Defense, is University Professor at Harvard. His book The Future of Power will be published in February.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010.
www.project-syndicate.org


Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

Seven natives held in battle with govt, Petronas

By Joseph Tawie

LAWAS: More Lun Bawang locals have been expected to be arrested in their ding-dong battle with a state supervision as well as Petronas over their local prevalent rights (NCR) land which a supervision refuses to recognise.

Since Thursday, 7 Lun Bawang locals have been arrested for ascent up a besiege to stop workers of Petronas Gas Pipeline plan from trespassing into, what they claim, their NCR land.

Four were arrested upon Thursday, though two of them have been expelled after their statements have been recorded. Three some-more were arrested yesterday.

More have been expected to be arrested in a next couple of days as they go upon to say a besiege in an effort to stop a plan unless a supervision recognises as well as pays compensation, Jameson Taie pronounced in an e-mail to FMT.

According to ASP Raduan of Criminal Investigation Department, Lawas, they have been being incarcerated to facilitate investigations in to a environment up of a besiege upon Samling timber lane during KP (Kilometre Petronas) 130.

The besiege was put up upon November 4. And despite a arrests, a Lun Bawang will go upon to say a barricade against a Petronas project, which is being built across a NCR land of a Lun Bawang.

Legal action

The pipeline is being assembled from Kimanis to Merapok, Lawas. It goes to Long Semado passing by multiform villages of Lun Bawang.

When contacted, a prominent NCR land lawyer Baru Bian, who comes from a community, pronounced which a single of those expelled stated which a detainees' hands were harmed after they were handcuffed.

He suggested them to lodge a military inform as well as seek healing treatment.

Said Bian: They have been putting up a besiege to stop a plan from passing by their NCR land because a state supervision as well as Petronas do not recognize their NCR land.

The supervision as well as Petronas contend a Lun Bawang locals have no NCR land as well as they (state supe! rvision as well as Petronas) have been really clever upon this as well as will not compensate any compensation. And these have a Lun Bawang really unhappy.

The Lun Bawang were living in these areas well before 1958, even before a arrival of a Brookes. They have been regulating a jungle track, which is being used by Petronas as a route of its project. How can they contend a Lun Bawang have no NCR land? asked Bian.

If we do not recognize their NCR land, afterwards a Lun Bawang will go upon to say a blockade.

However, a authorities have been trying to influence a locals to accept ex-gratia payment, though they (natives) have refused. They know which it is not right, as well as they know they have NCR land which they have assigned for a couple of generations.

And they refused to budge, pronounced Bian, who is additionally a authority of Sarawak PKR.

The Lun Bawang locals have been joined in their stand. They have been ordinary people though they work by their respective committees.

They have asked to forward their complaints as well as claims to their Temenggong as well as their village leaders who should endorse their claims as they additionally should know a history as well as a credentials of their NCR land.

If inside of fourteen days a issue is not settled, afterwards we have to record legal movement against a state supervision as well as Petronas, Bian warned.


Pendedahan Skandal dari Pembaca Malaysiawaves

NOTA EDITOR: Berikut adalah satu surat yang Tulang Besi terima dari seorang pembaca Malaysiawaves. Terserah kepada para pembaca sekelian untuk membuat kesimpulan.Selamat membaca.



(Download Cashflow syarikat Hub Technologies di sini)Apa yang ingin disampaikan dalam maklumat ini ialah bagaimana seorang timbalan menteri menggunakan kuasa untuk kepentingan syarikat tertentu. Awang Adek telah secara langsung mengarahkan agensi-agensi dan syarikat berkaitan kerajaan memberi kerja kepada syarikat bernama Hub technologies (M) sdn bhd.

Sejarahnya bermula ketika awang adek menjadi pengerusi Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB). Sebuah syarikat milik Hussein Bahari dan adiknya Omar Bahari bernama Aora Sdn Bhd, membawa masuk produk pemadam kebakaran Dynamico. Dynamico ialah satu produk pencegah kebakaran dari jenis aerosol. Ketika itu, penggunaan clean agent adalah sangat digalakkan di seluruh dunia kerana sifatnya yang lebih semulajadi (boleh terurai dalam udara) dan tidak mengotorkan. Ini sangat berbeza dengan sistem aerosol yang akan meninggalkan kesan serbuk putih yang toksik kepada manusia dan juga bersifat menghakis. Dengan tiada tanggungjawab, Awang Adek ketika itu menggunakan kuasanya untuk memberi projek bernilai jutaan ringgit kepada syarikat Aora Sdn Bhd.

Mungkin kerana tidak cukup, Hussein dan Omar Bahari membentuk 1 syarikat baru bernama Hub Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd dan membawa masuk 1 lagi produk aerosol bernama Aerohub. Kali ini mereka mensasarkan lebih banyak GLC dan agensi kerajaan, jabatan-jabatan, badan berkanun dan hospital-hospital dan Kementerian Pertahanan. Awang Adek kali ini menggunakan kuasanya untuk menggerakkan UKAS/3PU Unit Kerjasama Awam-Swasta untuk mendapatkan projek. Projek terbaru ketika ini sedang dibuat bersama Kementerian Pertahanan.

UKAS atau 3PU bukanlah badan yang mempunyai authority untuk meluluskan keberkesanan, kesesuaian atau pun efisiensi produk berkaitan produk pemadam kebakaran. Jabatan BOMBA sendiri TIDAK menakrif produk-produk ters! ebut seb agai clean agent dan TIDAK BOLEH digunakan di tempat berpenghuni atau occupied area. Apatah lagi ia boleh menyebabkan kerosakan pada alat dan mesin. Namun kerana kuasa yang ada pada Awang Adek dalam UKAS dan sebagai Timb Menteri Kewangan, projek itu telah diberi kepada Hub Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd.

Telekom Malaysia (TM) juga mempunyai sejarah penggunaan produk pemadam kebakaran aerosol yang tidak baik. Sebuah syarikat lain yang juga membawa produk yang sama dan tetap diberi projek bernilai jutaan ringgit. Kerosakan juga berlaku dan merugikan TM namun tiada laporan dalam akhbar mengenai apa sebenarnya berlaku.

Pada Julai 2010 Hub technologies (M) sdn bhd sekali lagi meminta bantuan Awang Adek. Pada 1hb Julai 2010 Hub technologies (M) sdn bhd didaftarkan di bawah Skim Jejak Jaya Bumiputra (sebuah badan di bawah Kementerian Kewangan) yang kemudian dijadikan platform atau saluran untuk menyampaikan rungutan kepada Kementerian.

Ketika ini Awang Adek dikatakan telah memberi arahan kepada-kepada jabatan kerajaan, agensi, badan berkanun anak syrikat kerajaan syarikat-syarikat berkaitan kerajaan seperti TNB, TM, kementerian-kementerian dan sebagainya untuk menggunakan produk Hub Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd. Kesemua projek-projek ini boleh dianggarkan bernilai puluhan juta ringgit atau mungkin mencecah seratus juta ringgit. Kalau macam ini barulah Hussein Bahari, Omar Bahari dan Awang Adek boleh kenyang.

Apapun nilai yang dibelanjakan oleh kerajaan pastinya kerugian yang berjumlah 2 kali ganda akan ditanggung kerana kerosakan dan penggantian produk baru.



Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

Selangor seeks royal hand over water bondholders’ bailout


KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 13 — The Selangor government is planning a 100,000-strong protest to submit a memorandum to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on December 5 over the federal government’s possible bailout of Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor (Syabas).

Top Selangor Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders informed The Malaysian Insider last night that the state’s move was part and parcel of a plan to “pressure” the Najib administration not to proceed with a multi-million ringgit bailout of the state’s privatised water industry, and that state-wide ceramahs and gatherings had already been planned in advance to mobilise the numbers needed to attend the December 5 gathering at Istana Negara.

“We are planning a 100,000-people gathering on December 5 to submit (a) memorandum to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the water issue. Venue will be at Masjid Negara, 12pm.

“Details of memorandum has yet to be decided on but essence is demanding the return of rights of water to the rakyat, anti-privatisation. We want private (water) companies to be consolidated with the state,” said Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua.

Pua says the government will be using people’s money to bail out weak companies. — File pic
The DAP national publicity secretary told The Malaysian Insider that the state government had planned 60 events from this week leading up to the date for the handing over of the memorandum.

“We have started the campaign to create awareness over the issue, prepared around 60 ceramahs around the state within the next three to four weeks. The ceramahs include with special focus groups, civil societies as well as church groups,” said Pua.

Sources told The Malaysian Insider recently that Selangor water bondholders will urge Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to intervene directly in the state’s water restructuring deadlock in an effort to safeguard their bonds from being further downgraded.

The Malaysian Insider understands that major bondholders — including CIMB Principal Asset Management, Hong Leong Investment Bank and Great Eastern Life — have drafted a joint letter to Najib asking the federal government to bail out Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor (Syabas) with a soft loan worth some RM1 billion.

In the letter, the bondholders contend that further downgrades of debt ratings will put capital markets at risk and will seriously impede the government’s effort to promote its Capital Markets Masterplan.

Putrajaya bailed out Syabas once already last year when it gave a RM320.8 million soft loan to parent company Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd (PNHB) in December to help settle its debts to water treatment concessionaires.

It is understood that the bondholders intend to issue a separate letter to the Selangor state government by early December at the latest to push for a speedy resolution of the state’s water woes.

“The RM1 billion bailout reflects very badly on the Najib administration. We must be more competitive, transparent. What is happening is directly against the concept of the ‘era where the government knows best is over’. The government is taking people’s money to bail out weak companies,” said Pua.

He admitted however that initial response to the ceramahs so far has been “slow”, attributing it to a lack of planning on the part of the organisers.

“The kickoff to the ceramahs started this week, Tuesday night was in Klang at Dewan Hamzah. The preparations were not that well planned so the turnout was not that great. But I just came back from another function at Taman Sri Manja, Petaling Jaya Selatan, and there was quite a good turnout, between 300 and 400 people.

“During the talks and functions, we plan to zoom on the failure of Syabas to fulfil (the) concessionaire agreement, the history of privatisation, the high fees charged for privatised water in the country. We will also address the government’s multimillion bailout instead of forcing them to consolidate (assets of concessionaires) and place it under control, purview of the state government,” he added.

Contacted by The Malaysian Insider, Selangor state executive councillor Teresa Kok confirmed the state government’s plans.

“I confirm the information, yes. I suggest you come and cover the function of the meeting between the mentri besar and local councillors and ketua kampung in Selangor tomorrow 3pm at Klang land office hall. You will know our plan better (then),” Kok told The Malaysian Insider.

Both Kok and Pua are senior leaders in the DAP, which forms PR with PKR and PAS.

Selangor’s water players — Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (Syabas), Puncak Niaga Sdn Bhd (PNSB), Syarikat Pengeluaran Air Sungai Selangor Sdn Bhd (Splash) and Konsortium ABASS — are at risk of debt payment default as water bonds approach their maturity dates.

The debt service problem started when Syabas was barred from implementing a 37 per cent tariff hike agreed upon in January 2009, after the Selangor government claimed the sole water distributor had not done enough to reduce leakages which cost the state millions.

This in turn led to payment problems between Syabas and water treatment concessionaires PNSB, Splash and Konsortium ABASS, who supply it with treated water.

All four term-loan borrowers are already in technical default following their inability to maintain six months’ worth of reserves in a special account used to pay bondholders. The shortfall is understood to be some RM50 million, although this deficit could double in six months.

The technical default triggered a downgrade of the debt issuances by Malaysian Rating Corp Bhd (MARC) and RAM Ratings Services Bhd on September 8, who warned of further multiple-notch downgrades in this quarter. An industry source told The Malaysian Insider that bondholders suffered RM457 million in mark-to-market losses following the downgrade.

Syabas, PNSB, PNHB, RUN Holding SPV Bhd (RUNH), Splash, Viable Chip (M) Sdn Bhd (VCSB) and Titisan Modal (M) Sdn Bhd (TMSB) were downgraded by MARC while RAM cut ratings for Splash and Taliworks Corp Bhd subsidiaries Destinasi Teguh Sdn Bhd and Sungai Harmoni Sdn Bhd.

A statement by MARC at the time urged the federal and state governments to urgently interfere in the water industry’s restructuring negotiations to prevent a free fall of ratings in following months.

PR leaders have insisted that a bailout would only rescue Barisan Nasional (BN) “cronies” who have profited “tremendously” from the government’s privatisation exercise.

PAS MP Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad, in a blog posting earlier this week, urged Energy, Green Technology and Water Minister Datuk Seri Peter Chin to invoke sections within the Water Services Industry Act (WSIA) 2006 to allow consolidated management of water in Selangor, as well as other states.

“The minister must invoke the provision of sections 113 and 114 to intervene and safeguard the greater interest of the people of Selangor, Putrajaya and Kuala Lumpur so as to put the long-drawn fiasco to rest once and for all, in the true spirit and purpose of the enactment of WSIA, 2006 and the legislation of SPAN, 2006, which is to have a holistic and consolidated management of water in all states,” said the Kuala Selangor MP.

Even the 'dead' voted in Batu Sapi


By Queville To, Free Malaysia Today

KUALA LUMPUR: There were 156 voters who were more than 100 years old whose names appeared in the electoral rolls of the recently concluded Batu Sapi by-election.

But they were also found to be dead, with death certificates issued by the National Registration Department (NRD).

Tawau MP Chua Soon Bui revealed this in Parliament when questioning the competence of the Election Commission (EC) during the debate on Budget 2011 last week.

“We were told that the electoral roll has been cleaned up, but how come these names were still there? How many of these had been found to have voted in the recent Batu Sapi by-election? Please explain why such cases are still happening,” she asked.

She also demanded to know why more than 20 people were prevented from voting in Batu Sapi with their names replaced in the electoral roll with those of others but using their MyKad numbers.

Chua was also dissatisfied with the answer given by the EC officials in Batu Sapi that they could do nothing about it and that the affected voters should check their MyKad with the NRD.

She described such an answer as being irresponsible on the part of the EC, citing that in the first place the mistakes were made by them, hence it was their responsibility to rectify it with the NRD, instead of making the complainants run around.

No ban on non-Muslim places of worship, MB 'misquoted'

PETALING JAYA: The Selangor government today clarified that it was not banning the building of non-Muslim places of worship near residential areas.

In a statement today, the press secretariat said that Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim was misquoted on the matter.

It also clarified that there was no ban on development near places of worship.

The press secretariat said the state government was just making it compulsory for all new housing developments in Selangor to take into consideration existing temples and other places of worship at or near the built site when submitting development plans.

"Approvals will not be given if the developer fails to take into account these places of worship or at least prepare a relocation plan that is agreeable to all parties."

"The reports that accuse the Pakatan Rakyat government of not taking into account temples and places of worship while approving projects are inaccurate.”

The statement read that development of places of worship should be done in a well-planned manner that followed the state government's guideline so as to satisfy all stakeholders – which include housebuyers, the state government and the community.

Since July 2008, the state government had approved 30 land grants to Hindu temples while 15 others were still awaiting the approval of the exco to be gazetted.

Contacted later, Khalid's press secretary Arfa'eza A Aziz said when Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor (PKNS) came in with the development plan for Section 19, it did not take into consideration the existing temple there and left it out of the knowledge of buyers, and the government wanted to make sure that did not recur.

"The developers have to be extra cautious. Either they include the temples in their development plan or take steps to relocate them properly.

“If they hide this from the government, and we later discover, they stand to have their development cancelled. We don't want what happened in Section 19 and 23 to happen again," she said.

Yesterday, Khalid said most housebuyers were caught by surprise to find non-Muslim places of worship in the respective areas despite being told otherwise by the developer when inking the agreement.

He had said this decision was made in relation to the controversial relocation of a Hindu temple to the Muslim majority area of Section 23 here, which led to the infamous cow-head protest last year.

"Samy Bodoh" !

Samy draws flak over 'ignorant' comments
Harakahdaily

SHAH ALAM, Nov 13: Samy Vellu's comments on the Selangor state government's policy on houses of worship have drawn the flak from several Pakatan Rakyat leaders, saying the MIC strongman "shoot off his mouth in ignorance.

"Why can’t they read first before shooting their mouths off in ignorance?” asked Sivarasa Rasiah, the Subang member of parliament.

Samy had said the state government was attempting to "systematically divide Muslims and non-Muslims" in introducing the houses of worship policy, and called for it to be revoked. The outgoing MIC president also accused Selangor menteri besar Khalid Ibrahim of "playing with fire" for questioning religious freedom as enshrined in the Federal constitution.

Sri Andalas state assemblyman Dr Xavier Jeyakumar said Samy should check his facts before issuing any statement.

“Get your facts right and don't be a rumour monger. You as a leader should check before issuing a statement," he said, and urged Samy to read the state assembly hansard.

Earlier, Khalid said non-Muslim places of worship would not be allowed to be constructed close to residential areas in order to avert racial tension, citing the infamous 'cow-head' protest by several UMNO members in Shah Alam last year.

Yesterday, the state government, clarifying the statement by Khalid, said construction of places of worship must be done in an orderly manner and in accordance with the guidelines to ensure the interests of all parties were safeguarded.

“The new housing projects to be built in Selangor are required to take into account the existence of temples and other places of worship that have existed at the site or nearby construction site,” it said.

The state government warned that developers who failed to take into account houses of worship that already existed near the construction site would not be given approval. It also added they must at least prepare a plan for the transfer of these buildings before the start of any development project.

The state government said it had approved 30 plots for Hindu temples, with another 15 awaiting the Exco’s approval.

“The media reports alleging that Pakatan Rakyat does not consider temples and other places of worship when approving a development project are not true,” it stressed.

Azmin widens lead with 6,207 majority in PKR No. 2 race


Azmin - his moment has come despite obstacles from rivals
Twelve more PKR divisions in the country held their elections today, involving eight in Kedah and four in Kelantan.

These are Jerai, Merbok,Sungai Petani, Baling, Sik, Jerlun, Padang Terap and Pendang, Machang, Jeli, Kuala Krai dan Gua Musang.

There was a difference in the election which went into its third week today as the focus of attention - the deputy presidential race - was left with only two contenders after Zaid Ibrahim pulled out presiden.

Based on unofficial results from 99 of 222 divisions which have held their elections up to now - 87 last week and 12 today - Azmin Ali is still leading with a majority of 6,207 votes.

He obtained a total of 7,649 votes while his sole remaining challenger Mustaffa Kamil Ayub obtained 1,442 votes.

Azmin obtained a total of 1,182 votes from 12 divisions today, while Mustaffa added only 227 votes.

With the rest of the PKR divisions to vote tomorrow and next weekend, it is unlikely for Mustaffa to be able to catch up with Azmin and score an upset.

Voters turnout remain low with fewer than five percent of PKR members going to the ballots.

The following are the unofficial results for the 12 divisions that voted today.


Gua Musang

Azmin (96), Mustaffa (7)

Machang

Azmin (43), Mustaffa (47)

Kuala Krai

Azmin (134), Mustaffa (27)

Jerai

Azmin (84), Mustaffa (6)

Sik

Azmin (108), Mustaffa (7)

Baling

Azmin (82), Mustaffa (14)

Jeli

Azmin (49), Mustaffa (20)

Padang Terap

Azmin (37), Mustaffa (4)

Sungai Petani

Azmin (169), Mustaffa (22)


Jerlun

Azmin (24), Mustaffa (6)

Pendang

Azmin (100), Mustaffa (0)

Merbok

Azmin (256), Mustaffa (67)

- Malaysiakini

Zaid Ibrahim is losing allies in PKR

by Terence Netto@www.malaysiakini.com

COMMENT Zaid Ibrahim is losing potential allies faster than gaining new ones in his fight for reforms in PKR.

That’s because he cannot sustain a clear line of attack, a necessity whenever a would-be reformer attempts to change the status quo.

Yesterday, a statement of support for the party leadership by Mustaffa Kamil Ayub, the third contestant in the race for the deputy president’s post, clearly disassociated the author from Zaid’s spiraling attacks in the latter’s course of dissidence within PKR.

Not that Mustaffa would ordinarily have made common cause with Zaid in the struggle for reform of PKR; he merely seemed to agree with Zaid that the ongoing election process in the party, particularly the contest for deputy president, is tainted with irregularities. He called for the election’s suspension pending investigations.

But when Zaid expanded his criticisms of the electoral process to include attacks on Anwar Ibrahim and Azmin Ali, describing the PKR supremo and his loyalist, as the root cause of the party’s problems, Mustaffa must have felt the need to pull the brakes.

Mustaffa came out in support of the party leadership, thus drawing a clear line of distinction between his reservations about the election process and Zaid’s expansive criticisms.

Another ally of Zaid’s, N Gobalakrishnan, a contestant in the race for one of four vice-presidential slots, also took the opportunity yesterday to disassociate from Zaid’s scatter-shot approach.

In a meeting with divisional leaders in Johor Baru yesterday, attended by Anwar, Chua Jui Meng and Azmin, Gobalakrishnan, presently running an impressive fifth in the tally of votes for the veep position, said he would not endorse Zaid’s attacks on Anwar.

“I support him in the contest for deputy president but when he expanded his attacks to include Anwar as a target, I had to make clear I support Anwar in his struggle to bring political reform to the country,” Gobalakrishnan told Malaysiakini on the sidelines of the meeting.

Gobala: I’m still with Anwar

Earlier, Gobalakrishnan candidly told assembled divisional leaders, in the presence of Azmin, Zaid’s rival for deputy president, that he supported Zaid in the contest for party No 2 but not in his new-found vein of attacks on Anwar.

“I have been with Anwar since the start of reformasi 12 years ago and I am still with him. He has brought me up in the party and I will not abandon his struggles for reform of the country,” said Gobalakrishnan when invited to speak at the gathering.

Until Zaid announced earlier this week that he was quiting the race for deputy president, Gobalakrishnan was conspicuous in his support for Zaid.

But with Zaid digressing from his frequently expressed criticisms of the ongoing electoral exercise to include attacks on Anwar and Azmin Ali, Gobalakrishnan felt obliged to make a distinction between support for Zaid’s personal and corporate quests. The distinction would not have been made had Zaid been more disciplined in his approach.

Why only very inclusive and 1Malaysia speeches/statements before by-elections but racist slurs and very anti-1Malaysia sentiments especially after Umno/BN by-election victories?

Malaysians have been entitled to ask the reason for the new materialisation why only really inclusive as well as 1Malaysia speeches/statements prior to by-elections but racist slurs as well as really anti-1Malaysia sentiments generally after Umno/Barisan Nasional by-election victories?Two days prior to the Galas as well as Batu Sapi by-elections upon Nov 4, 2010, the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razaks debate to the World Chinese Economic Forum was described as the reaching out to the Chinese Malaysian Community conceding that Malaysias 2020 idea of the grown republic competence fail but the support.Najibs debate said:Malaysia would not be what it is today but the industry, imagination as well as loyalty of the Malaysian Chinese community.Likewise, there will be the dour destiny for Malaysia but the Chinese communitys support. We would obviously tumble reduced of reaching the goals to become the grown republic by 2020.
However, really conflicting sentiments appear to have the upper hand rught away after the Galas as well as Batu Sapi by-elections with repulsive statements as well as the really critical slur opposite the Malaysian Chinese as well as Indians done in reduction than the single week of the two by-elections upon Nov 4.
On Tuesday, 9th November, Defence Minister Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi insulted Malaysian Chinese andIndians when he told Parliament during subject time that the low appearance of non-Malays generally among the Chinese as well as Indians in the troops could be due to lack of patriotism.
The subsequent day, Wednesday, 10th November, 2010, the Umno-owned newspaper Utusan Malaysia carried aprominent essay that described May thirteen as the dedicated day as well as the day to be celebrated.It is hapless that my supplementary subject to the Deputy Home Minister Datuk Abu Seman in Parliament yesterday was not allowed by the Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin, as I had longed for to know whether the corner committee set up by Home Ministry to deal wit! h offens ive, supportive as well as factious media reports would be behaving upon Utusan Malaysias essay glorifying May thirteen as the dedicated day when it is the blackest day in the history of Malaysia that price the lives of Malaysians of all racial groups.As Utusan Malaysia is Umno mouthpiece, the essay must be taken even more seriously as it tantamounts to the open elimination of Najibs 1Malaysia policy.How can the Prime Minister design his inclusive 1Malaysia concept as well as policy to command credit as well as national as well as international certainty when there is so most flip-flops demonstrating the Jekyll-and-Hyde dimension?

PKR polls: All eyes on king-maker Selangor divisions


Azmin, Mustaffa left in No. 2 race after Zaid dropped outKUALA LUMPUR PKR divisions in Selangor, the state with the highest number of members, vote today in the party's first-ever and most fractious direct election that has been marred by claims of fraud and manipulation.

Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has already pulled out of the heated race for the party deputy presidency, while another contender, vice-president Mustaffa Kamil Ayub, is now contesting under protest against front-runner Azmin Ali, the vice-president who is confidant to PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Both Zaid and Mustaffa claim the polls have been marked by irregularities and want fresh elections to be called while Azmin says all votes cast should be counted.

PKR organising secretary Radin Shamsulkamar Shamsudin said candidates who are trailing in the race would be able to reverse their fortune with the help of Selangor members.

Selangor has around 100,000 members. So even a candidate with only hundreds of votes may be able beat others with the support of let say 10 per cent of the members, he told The Malaysian Insider.

Voting in Selangor begins with the Sepang division this morning while eight other divisions will vote tomorrow.

As of last weekend, a total of 11,670 members from 87 of the 218 divisions have voted. Voting turnout since the start of polling process on October 29 is around 12 per cent.

A party insider expected the voting tally in the contest for the four vice-president posts to change with Selangor leaders performing better than the current leading candidates.

Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar is now leading the PKR vice-presidential race with 6,518, followed by Tian Chua (5,115), Fuziah Salleh (4,509) and Mansor Othman (4,269).

They are trailed by Padang Serai MP N. Gobalakrishnan (3,039) and Selangor executive councillor Xa! vier Jay akumar (2,418).

Subang MP Sivarasa Rasiah finished seventh last weekend.

Two other Selangor candidates in the race are Kapar MP S. Manickavasagam and a former aide to Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, Yahya Sahri who are still trailing with 2,005 and 535 votes respectively.

Yahya Sahri and Manickavasagam are most likely to make major gains this weekend. Both of them have been active campaigning in Selangor, said a party member familiar with the campaigning activities.

Gobalakrishnan too was confident of making it to the top four.

I am confident of at least fourth place with the votes from Selangor members, Gobalakrishnan told The Malaysian Insider.

Another party insider however believed that position of the top four vice-president candidates are secure, but the race for the 25-seat central leadership council (MPP) would be more intense.

The top four will continue to lead the race, but the competition will be for the fifth place as the candidate will most likely be appointed vice-president, he said.

He however expected more elected representatives to make it to the top 25 in the MPP race. As of last weekend only nine out of 18 PKRs elected representatives are in.

More surprises will be seen in the MPP contest. A lot of people who have not done well previously will improve this weekend, he said.

Yaakob Sapari, for example, is expected to do better this weekend, he added, referring to the Selangor executive councillor who ended up in 38th place last weekend.

A total of 132 candidates are running for the 25 MPP positions.

The voting process, which began October 29, ends on November 21 and the results would be officially announced at the PKR annual congress which will be held from November 26 to 28. - Malaysian Insider

See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Zaid Ibrahim is losing allies in PKR

November 13, 2010

Zaid Ibrahim is losing allies in PKR

by Terence Netto@www.malaysiakini.com

COMMENT Zaid Ibrahim is losing potential allies faster than gaining new ones in his fight for reforms in PKR.

Thats because he cannot sustain a clear line of attack, a necessity whenever a would-be reformer attempts to change the status quo.

Yesterday, a statement of support for the party leadership by Mustaffa Kamil Ayub, the third contestant in the race for the deputy presidents post, clearly disassociated the author from Zaids spiraling attacks in the latters course of dissidence within PKR.

Not that Mustaffa would ordinarily have made common cause with Zaid in the struggle for reform of PKR; he merely seemed to agree with Zaid that the ongoing election process in the party, particularly the contest for deputy president, is tainted with irregularities. He called for the elections suspension pending investigations.

But when Zaid expanded his criticisms of the electoral process to include attacks on Anwar Ibrahim and Azmin Ali, describing the PKR supremo and his loyalist, as the root cause of the partys problems, Mustaffa must have felt the need to pull the brakes.

Mustaffa came out in support of the party leadership, thus drawing a clear line of distinction between his reservations about the election process and Zaids expansive criticisms.

Another ally of Zaids, N Gobalakrishnan, a contestant in the race for one of four vice-presidential slots, also took the opportunity yesterday to disassociate from Zaids scatter-shot approach.

In a meeting with divisional leaders in Johor Baru yesterday, attended by Anwar, Chua Jui Meng and Azmin, Gobalakrishnan, presently running an impressive fifth in the tally of votes! for the veep position, said he would not endorse Zaids attacks on Anwar.

I support him in the contest for deputy president but when he expanded his attacks to include Anwar as a target, I had to make clear I support Anwar in his struggle to bring political reform to the country, Gobalakrishnan told Malaysiakini on the sidelines of the meeting.

Gobala: Im still with Anwar

Earlier, Gobalakrishnan candidly told assembled divisional leaders, in the presence of Azmin, Zaids rival for deputy president, that he supported Zaid in the contest for party No 2 but not in his new-found vein of attacks on Anwar.

I have been with Anwar since the start of reformasi 12 years ago and I am still with him. He has brought me up in the party and I will not abandon his struggles for reform of the country, said Gobalakrishnan when invited to speak at the gathering.

Until Zaid announced earlier this week that he was quiting the race for deputy president, Gobalakrishnan was conspicuous in his support for Zaid.

But with Zaid digressing from his frequently expressed criticisms of the ongoing electoral exercise to include attacks on Anwar and Azmin Ali, Gobalakrishnan felt obliged to make a distinction between support for Zaids personal and corporate quests. The distinction would not have been made had Zaid been more disciplined in his approach.



See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Warta Keadilan berwajah baru, tiada permit

Oleh Jamilah Kamarudin

PETALING JAYA: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) tetap menerbitkan lidah rasminya walaupun masih tidak mendapat restu assent daripada Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN).

Berwajah baru dengan penampilan sulungnya sebagai Warta Keadilan, akhbar mingguan setebal 32 halaman muka surat itu diterbitkan secara tidak berkala untuk dan sudah mula berada dipasaran sejak hari ini dengan harga RM2.

Pengarangnya Fazallah Pit ketika dihubungi berkata, akhbar itu adalah transformasi daripada akhbar Suara Keadilan lalu dimana kandungannya kini beralih arah mensasarkan untuk menarik semula minat golongan pembaca daripada kalangan reformis, namun masih mengekalkan gaya penulisan secara profesional.

"Kami mahu beralih 'angin' dengan menarik minta lebih kepada golongan reformis kerana dahulu kandungan akhbar ini lebih tersasar kepada golongan profesional dan bukan ahli PKR.

"Melalui penyatuan gelombang reformis dan profesional ini kami harap akhbar ini mampu memberi maklumat telus mengenai perkembangan parti dan agendanya," katanya ketika dihubungi FMT.

Turut difahamkan kartunis Zulkiflee Anwar Ulhaque atau lebih dikenali sebagai Zunar menjadi Penasihat Pengarang akhbar ini.

Fazallah berkata kandungan akhbar berwajah baru terbitan parti itu antaranya memfokuskan mengenai jawapan tohmahan dan kepincangan terhadap Jawatankuasa Pemilihan Parti (JPP) dalam ruangan khas temubual bersama Setiausaha Agung PKR Saifuddin Nasution.

"Segala persoalan tentang ketelusan sistem pemilihan Majlis Pimpinan Pusat (MPP) oleh JPP terjawab dalam tiga helai muka surat wawancara bersama Saifuddin," katanya.

Muka depan akhbar itu pula memaparkan berita utama Gugur tuduhan terhadap Anwar yang memfokuskan mengenai isu tuduhan liwat terhadap Ketua Pembangkang Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Turut menampilkan kolum hasil tulisan reformis Hishamuddin Rais serta ya! ng lain.

Terdahulu, akhbar Warta Keadilan diterbitkan selepas penggantungan assent Suara Keadilan oleh KDN berikutan penyiaran berita utama di muka hadapan akhbar yang bertajuk "Felda Bangkrap" keluaran 237 bertarikh 22-29 Jun lalu.

Timbalan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Ahmad Maslan mendakwa Suara Keadilan menyiarkan tuduhan fitnah terhadap syarikat konglomerat itu tunai mengenai rizab tunai Felda yang merosot hampir RM3 bilion.

KDN kemudiannya menyatakan assent Suara Keadilan yang tamat tempoh pada thirty Jun lalu tidak akan diperbaharui sehingga kementerian menerima penjelasan memuaskan berhubung penyiaran beberapa artikel termasuk mengenai Felda.

Beberapa ahli parlimen PKR sebelum ini juga pernah bertemu Menteri Dalam Negeri Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein di Parlimen bagi membincangkan kemelut isu assent akhbar berkenaan namun sehingga sekarang masih menemui jalan buntu.

Berikutan itu, akhbar lidah rasmi PKR mula berubah judul secara tidak berkala dengan terbitan Utusan Keadilan, Obor, serta Sinar Keadilan.

Edisi terakhir akhbar itu diterbitkan dengan nama Metro Keadilan sehingga dihentikan pada Ogos lalu berikutan hasil pengedaran dan penjualannya yang turun mendadak selepas permitnya digantung KDN.


Ahmad Zahid Hamidi should resign for questioning the loyalty and patriotism of non-Malays


This article is submitted by a Retired Senior Armed Forces Malaysian who also happens to be a NON-MALAY

I'm a third generation Malaysian who had served the Malaysian Armed Forces for 38 devoted years. The article in STAR Page N14 recently which carried derogatory remarks by the Malaysian Defence Minister about non-Malays not only jolted me out of my slumber but also infuriated me. The Defence Minister, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi announced that one of the possible reasons for the low intake of non-Malays in the Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) is that their "patriotism spirit is not high enough"!

Ironically, if my memory serves right, in 1998 this same Zahid Hamidi spoke out against then Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, calling for an end to cronyism and nepotism in the Malaysian government. Zahid, then seen as an ally of deposed Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, was subsequently arrested and held in prison under the Internal Security Act. His oxymoronic statement implies that millions of Malaysians, including Malays, who chose not to join the Armed Forces are also not patriotic.

It must be acknowledged that the UMNO-led Government is promising a lot of reforms and taken initiatives that appear to be commendable but whilst the'Gods are willing, the priests are not'. The implementation on the ground, as always, has been an issue to which they conveniently close an eye or even both. The BTN inculcation is another monster that the UMNO Government, under the 'able' leadership of our not-so-pendatang PM Dr Mahathir, has created. The evil of BTN must be systemically reversed or we are all doomed and extremists like Zahid Hamidi, who are politically ambitious, who will not hesitate to play the race card again in order to rise within the ranks of UMNO, must be condemned by all right thinking mem! bers of the Malaysian society. Like in most Government Departments, non-Malays are not appointed in certain sections of Departmental Work where it entails transparency. Thus is the case of the MAF Recruiting Division and several other fields purely at the discretion of those placed in power, and this power is abused with the tacit approval of those walking the Corridors of Power. The MAF Recruiting Division over the years has been hoodwinking the public by manipulating the application figures. There are ample cases where applications by well qualified non-Malay candidates have either ended up in waste paper baskets or rejected with fictitious excuses. On the other hand, the lesser ones are either called up and rejected as not qualified or a token sum is absorbed in order to just satisfy the political masters and project the multi-racial composition of the MAF. These poor fall guys end up being miserable with no future in their career. They simply mark time and quit service later into oblivion. What career prospects await the non-Malay today in the Government's service? All the senior positions held by non-Malays are quickly and promptly replaced by Malays when these non-Malays retire. Non-Malays who are competent, able and well qualified are by-passed and these promotions are then given to Malays who are less qualified, less competent but have the 'kulit-ifications'. When compared to the Malays, there is absolutely no career planning for non-Malays and thus stifling their promotion prospects which is further acerbated by the self imposed quota system. This pathetic situation obviously doesn't augur well for potential candidates to join the MAF. The non-Malays are made to feel that they are there merely as gap-fillers despite their earnest portrayal of professionalism, loyalty and patriotism. Unfortunately, many of our politicians like Zahid Hamidi, are either too inexperienced or simply too naive to understand the frustration and agony of highly devoted non-Malays who had served and are still serving our beloved! nation. You should wake up and spend time amongst service personnel to see the mutual respect and camaraderie that exists regardless of race, creed and colour! You and your Cabinet counterparts, in consultation with the Service Chiefs, should devote your time to address the root cause for this long overdue predicament of the Non-Malays. By the way, this was never the case in the 60s and 70s. Another product of BTN and Dr Mahathir's style of helping the handicapped Malays to stay on top despite the odds and the non-Malays are again made scapegoats.

An Officer and Gentleman.

Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

Zaid Supporters Missing From Elections

Supporters of Datuk Zaid Ibrahim were believed to have stayed away from three Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) divisional meetings Friday.

The members from Machang, Gua Musang dan Jeli divisions opted from voting for PKR supreme council members.

Machang PKR division secretary Mohd Jafri Manan said most of the 1,300 members failed to turn up when voting closed at 5pm Friday.

"Most of them are youth members supportive of Datuk Zaid Ibrahim," he told reporters here Friday.

Jeli PKR division chief Mat Sulaiman said only 100 of 700 members attended the meeting with some citing the rain as reason for staying away.

It was the same in Gua Musang division where most of the 2,179 members failed to turn up citing the bad weather.

Gua Musang division chief Hanafi Abdullah said the rain made it difficult for many members to turn up as many stay in rural areas.

-- BERNAMA

DAP alleges Facebook attack by BN


By Rahmah Ghazali

SHAH ALAM: Barisan Nasional members or supporters are apparently using Facebook to cause discord in Pakatan Rakyat, according to the state assemblyman for Kampung Tunku, Lau Weng San of DAP.

He told reporters today that individuals using pseudonyms had posted damaging comments on several DAP members’ Facebook pages, claiming that DAP and PKR would swap constituency seats in the next general election.

"Selangor DAP has agreed to swap constituency seats in the general election with PKR, with DAP contesting in Kajang and PKR in Balakong. Good news for BN," he quoted one of the postings, written in Bahasa Malaysia by a user calling himself Tuan Ahli Majlis.

Kajang is traditionally a PKR seat and Balakong is DAP’s.

Lau, who is Selangor DAP secretary, said the obvious intention was to put the two Pakatan allies on a collision course.

"There's no such thing as swapping the two seats,” Lau he said. “Such a decision can only be made by Pakatan’s top leadership."

Similar comments had been making the rounds of DAP members’ pages, he added. One was posted in Chinese by 'Kns Pkm'.

Asked to explain his suspicion that BN was responsible for mischievous postings, Lau said: "They are meant to create instability in Pakatan, so I am not discounting that they had a hand in this."

DAP denies Balakong-Kajang swap with PKR

DAP has denied Internet rumours that it intends to swap its Balakong state constituency for PKR's Kajang for the next polls.

Selangor DAP has dismissed cyberspace talk that the party will swap its Kajang state constituency for the PKR's Balakong before the next general elections.

State DAP secretary Lau Weng San said that the heavy chatter on Facebook were untrue.

He pointed out that in every by-election since 2008, PAS, DAP and PKR had contested the same seats as in the last general election.

As such, it was unlikely that this will change in the next polls and thus the chatter was groundless.

NONE"I strongly condemn this irresponsible claims. Such claims aim to break Pakatan's bond and unity," Lau (left) told reporters on the sidelines of the Selangor state assembly sitting today.

He stressed that there has yet to be any discussion within Pakatan Rakyat on swapping of constituencies.

Balakong is currently held by DAP's Yap Lum Chin while Kajang is represented by PKR's Lee Kim Sin.

Free mammograms

Kajang is considered a mixed-race constituency with Malays forming 46 percent of the electorate and Chinese 44 percent, a situation unlikely to be attractive for the's DAP attention.

azlanIn another development, Lau said that women in Selangor can apply for the state government's free health check scheme at their respective state assemblyperson's office.

He said the eligible women will be given free health checks such as mammograms and breast ultrasound.

The state government will also be providing free transportation for women to the hospital.

An allocation of RM5 million has been set aside for the scheme. Women aged 35 and above who show a high risk of breast cancer will be eligible for the scheme.

Only Sarawakians can save Sarawak, Politicians cannot save Sarawak.


By Maclean Patrick

People love the underdog. There’s something magical about a person who, when down in the dumps, is able to rise above all adversities and win the day.

We remember the tragic Spartacus, the Roman gladiator-turned-revolutionary, who died fighting for a cause. At Spartacus’ time and age, he was the villain, the opposition, the counter-government, yet history remembers Spartacus and not the Roman government that defeated and killed him.

Spartacus was the underdog and we cheer him on today.

We remember Mahatma Gandhi, the passive resistance fighter who won the independence of India without bloodshed yet it was his blood that was shed in the end. It is the picture of the small frame man, weaving his own clothes that we remember.

Mahatma Gandhi was the underdog and we marvel at his actions today.

And who can forget the students at Tiananmen Square. The poetic image of the lone stranger standing, plastic bags in hand, in front of a tank, stirs deep emotions for those of us watching from afar. The peaceful sit-down was broken up in a hail of bullets and coordinated violence.

The Chinese students were the underdog and we honour their sacrifice.

All is not fair in politics. The above figures paid the ultimate price to challenge the politics of the day. They fought for their principles, lost and stood defeated. Yet, history records their exploits and the underdog came up tops.

Pakatan Rakyat is the underdog in Malaysian politics – a seemingly unfair playing field where the rules of engagement are determined by the establishment of the day. Victories are few and casualties are plenty.

God-send for BN

It seemed worth the effort to throw support for the underdog, yet when the underdog is reduced to biting spells within its own ranks, the underdog has only itself to blame.

The withdrawal of Zaid Ibrahim from the PKR electoral race and his resignation from all party posts did not go unnoticed for those of us in Sarawak, where the only means of information is via mainstream media; any bad press for Pakatan is ammunition for Barisan Nasional to discredit and tear Pakatan’s name in Sarawak.

The withdrawal was a god-send for BN, which was already laying down the rules of engagement for the upcoming state election. The media spin itself was good enough to sway the masses in BN’s favour.

How can the people of Sarawak throw their vote behind Pakatan when it cannot even conduct proper voting for its own office-bearers? How can Pakatan promise stability to Sarawak when its own boat is rocking in the water?

The people of Sarawak want change – to breathe fresh air after 30-odd years of living in the confines of a Machiavillian rule. We want to see better government, and less corruption, a more caring establishment that listens to the voices of the normal citizens and takes pride in ratifying the problems we have long endured.

Must the people of Sarawak now remind Pakatan that the struggle for change does not mean squabbling over who gets the top seat at the dinner table? What good is Pakatan at leading the charge for change when it cannot even start off the starting block?

It’s the tipping point for Pakatan. What happens in the next few weeks will determine the success or failure during the coming political battle called the general election.

Time Pakatan be serious

For Sarawakians, it means the demise of the only significant challenge to the ruling BN and the chance for change to happen in our lifetime. Are we to endure another term of rule from the current establishment? Only to have Pakatan promise us again that change is coming?

Or will the people of Sarawak choose a path that is non-political?

It is evident that politics will not save Sarawak. Politicians will not save Sarawak. It is the people who will save Sarawak.

We need Spartacus, Mahatma Gandhi and the spirit of the Tiananmen students to lead the charge for change.

Yes, it is a long-withdrawn battle and losing is assured, yet history will record that the lay people put up a stand against an establishment bent on manipulating them for personal gains.

With or without Pakatan, the people of Sarawak will mount an ongoing assault for change. This is the legacy we want to leave our children.

This is something Pakatan needs to understand. It is not that Sarawak needs Pakatan to fight its battle. Pakatan needs Sarawakians. And all we ask is that Pakatan put its act together and come along side us.

It is high time Pakatan brought about a change to the political landscape of Malaysia by beating to a different beat from the BN: show the people that it is capable, mature and can overcome internal bickering and work towards fulfilling all its promises.

Barack Obama joins the ranks of the underdogs as someone who rose from the unknown and won the highest seat in government in the United States.

For a nation riven with racial issues, having a president of mixed parentage (his mother was white and father African) is unheard of, yet the people’s will cannot be denied.

In Sarawak, change will happen because the people desire it. And neither the BN nor Pakatan can deny them that.

Pakatan, it is time for you to be serious about leading the charge for change. – FMT

So you want to rumble, let’s rumble


Anwar Ibrahim admitted that he made a serious mistake in choosing the candidates in the last general election. But he qualifies this mistake by saying that it was because they were not able to find good candidates.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Nik Nazmi (article below) is not the only one who, over the last few days, wrote about the ‘third force’. Many other political analysts have done the same. Maybe it is time that I reply to some of these criticisms.

We from the civil society movements (Bloggers and political activists included) launched Barisan Rakyat before even Pakatan Rakyat was mooted. At that time there was a clear and present danger that PKR, DAP and PAS may not see eye to eye and may engage each other in three- or four-corner fights -- like they did in the two general elections before that (and with disastrous results, may I add).

Barisan Rakyat wanted to unite the three squabbling opposition parties and get them to agree on a common and joint election manifesto -- The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration.

We invited all Malaysian political parties to attend the launching ceremony and endorse these two documents. Only six came and none of them were from Barisan Nasional.

Invariably, therefore, The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration became an ‘opposition’ election manifesto due to the absence of the 14 Barisan Nasional parties.

At that time, we did not call Barisan Rakyat a ‘third force’. But that was what it was -- a gathering of civil society movements, Bloggers and political activists.

Then, back in 2008, when they needed our votes, they supported the third force called Barisan Rakyat. Today, now that they think they will soon be marching into Putrajaya to form the new Federal Government, they thumb their noses and look down on the third force.

The Malays say: kacang lupakan kulit. You have forgotten the role that the third force played in the 2008 general election. None of us contested the general election. We were not interested even if we had been asked to. And we still do not wish to contest the next general election even if you get down on your hands and knees and beg us to. But we toured the length and breadth of Malaysia to campaign for the opposition candidates. And we also campaigned in every by-election since.

Are you now getting too big for your britches? You no longer need us, is it? Well, just say so. Anwar Ibrahim already declared that we are outsiders. We do not belong and therefore should stay out and not interfere.

That is well and fine with me. The Malays also say: hidung tak mancung, pipi tersorong-sorong.

“If anything’s anything, a third party would simply split the vote of Malaysians who want to see real change. To me therefore (and I may be wrong about this), the only effect a third party would have in Malaysia would be to simply ensure the continuance of Barisan Nasional’s rule. Or is that the point?” said Nik Nazmi.

Yes, when we support you, we are great, fantastic, patriots, wonderful Malaysians, and whatnot. But when we criticise you, we are Trojan Horses, Barisan Nasional agents, we want to sabotage the opposition to allow Barisan Nasional to rule forever, etc.

Brader, we have been opposition since the 1970s, long before Anwar Ibrahim joined Umno in the 1980s. Anwar betrayed the cause by joining Umno and yet we forgave him and treated him as our comrade. And when he was ousted from Umno and sent to jail, it was we who stood by him and fought for him and suffered jail and detention without trial since 1998.

Long before many of you were even in politics and were still in school we have done what we could to bring Barisan Nasional to its knees and see the emergence of a strong opposition and a viable two-party system in Malaysia.

That mission and vision has not changed one bit. We are still committed to what we were committed to back in the 1970s, 35 years or so ago. Only the method now needs to change. And it needs to change because you in the opposition are proving to be bumbling fools.

We still want the political parties to endorse The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration and take that as the election manifesto. They endorsed it in 2008 and they never unendorsed it since. So what has changed? Nothing!

You have forgotten one thing. Power can come from the barrel of the gun. Power can also come through the ballot box. The people decide if you have power or not. All we want to do is to remind you that the people are the boss. The people gave you that power. THE PEOPLE ARE THAT THIRD FORCE THAT YOU LOOK DOWN UPON WITH CONTEMPT AND DISGUST! GET IT?

Power has got to your head. You forgot who made you. And you forgot that he who makes you can also break you. We hired you; we can also fire you. That is how it works. And if you don’t like it, tough!

Yes, we too want to see a strong two-party system. But it is not carte blanche. You are not King and Emperor. You are the people’s representative, the wakil rakyat. So we will decide how you run this country.

Anwar Ibrahim admitted that he made a serious mistake in choosing the candidates in the last general election. But he qualifies this mistake by saying that it was because they were not able to find good candidates.

We responded in our meeting with him by agreeing to help the opposition find good candidates from amongst the civil society movements. Now our effort is being mocked.

So be it. If you don’t need our help just say so. We are not forcing you to accept candidates we propose. If you can do well enough without our help, well and fine. If you want us to stay out of your affairs just say so. Just give the word. Tell us to fuck off and we will. Then you will never hear from us again.

You do your thing and we will do ours. No need for us to become a pain in you arse any longer. But just remember one thing. No longer will the people vote based on promises like back in 2008. No longer will the people vote for your party even if you field monkeys as candidates. This time around the people are going to scrutinise the candidates and vote for them only if they meet the criteria.

So good luck in the next general election.

*******************************************

Let’s Perfect the Two-Party System First

Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad

I am currently visiting Britain for a Commonwealth Parliamentary Association conference. Part of my trip will also include meetings with Malaysian students and expatriates all over the country.

As you probably know, I’m a UK graduate — from King’s College London — and so it’s always good to meet other young Malaysians who are pursuing their studies abroad as I did, or starting their careers. Back then, opposition-leaning students had to organise meetings covertly out of fear of reprisal.

It’s good to see therefore that the various Malaysian societies who host me now do so openly. As a matter of fact, the talk I gave in Warwick was hosted by the local Umno Club!

The young Malaysians I met, like their compatriots back home, are bright, talented and passionate about their homeland. One can only wish them well and hope that they will someday return to enrich our nation in turn.

Many of them have asked about the state of Pakatan Rakyat, and the troubles we’ve had lately. Their questions often remind me that I have to be at my best at all times. They also remind me that Pakatan has a long way to go on the road to Putrajaya.

That the last couple of months have been hard for Pakatan, especially Keadilan, is an understatement. We’ve suffered from several by-election losses and no small amount of internal problems.

Keadilan’s decision to hold its party elections on a one-member, one-vote system was historic but it has been hit by various technical problems and overinflated egos. It must also be admitted Pakatan hasn’t yet offered up a dynamic alternative to the comfortable, but ultimately fatal mediocrity that characterises Umno/BN’s style of government.

Also, it doesn’t help that certain establishment figures are determined to find fault with whatever we do. When Malaysians complain of state governments “not doing anything”, one sometimes wonder whether they are aware of how centralised power has become in Malaysia.

Most financial, security and oversight powers reside in the federal government. If it chooses to withhold its co-operation from certain states — as it has for those served by Pakatan — the ability to effect substantive reform there is severely limited. Such a situation will continue until and unless Malaysians elect a government that is willing to respect the spirit of federalism.

But I digress: Pakatan has been able to achieve much since 2008, but we ought to be doing much better. We definitely need to pull up our socks and realise that the wave that brought our candidates to office more than two years ago can just as easily knock them back. Believe me when I say that Pakatan is not unmindful of this and are working to improve ourselves.

For all the attacks on us by the establishment media, Pakatan has made great strides forward as a coalition. Keadilan, DAP and PAS are all committed to centrist, multi-racial politics: there will be no going back on this for us. We realise taking back Putrajaya for the people requires the support of all Malaysians, and not just our core supporter bases.

The initial problems aside, Keadilan’s elections have and will in the future provide our party leadership with greater legitimacy: better than any party that relies on backroom negotiations and “money politics.” Our leaders are truly elected, unlike certain politicians.

The party elections have brought out better grassroots leaders, of all ages, genders and ethnicities. They will provide us with candidates for the next elections, and will more than make up for the defectors and non-performers Malaysians have had to put up with. The decision of our leadership to trust the wisdom of the ordinary members has paid off.

Despite the sabotage and obstruction, Pakatan has achieved a lot in the states we serve. We’ve had a convention and launched a Common Policy Framework that clearly sets out the agenda of a Pakatan federal government. We stand by this document and it will form the basis of our manifesto in the next general election.

It will take time but Pakatan is well on the way to shaping up as a viable alternative to Barisan Nasional, towards the two-party (or rather two-coalition) system of politics we’ve all been waiting for.

The problem, however, is that people get impatient. Taking a leaf from Britain and Australia, there’s been a nascent movement in Malaysia’s blogsphere to forge a third party to contest the next general election in order to become kingmakers.

Romantic notions notwithstanding, it’s not clear, at least to me, how much difference a “third party” could make in Malaysian politics. Third parties are supposed to draw support away from both “established” parties.

The partisans of this line do not seem to have any ideas on how to crack open Malaysia’s rural heartlands, i.e. where Umno’s source of power lies. They have no real vision for winning votes from Barisan, and indeed seem to only want to punish Pakatan because certain of their idols did not get their way.

They are also fond of citing the “success” of the Liberal Democrats in the recent UK elections. Here’s a reality check: the Lib Dems are now lingering at about nine per cent in popular support, having been blamed for the harsh policies of their Conservative coalition partners.

If anything’s anything, a third party would simply split the vote of Malaysians who want to see real change. To me therefore (and I may be wrong about this), the only effect a third party would have in Malaysia would be to simply ensure the continuance of Barisan Nasional’s rule.

Or is that the point?

Malaysians deserve so much more from their politicians; I will be the first to admit. But trying to set up a “third force” will definitely not make things better.

Pakatan holds the promise to become the party of change, the political arm of the Malaysian people. It needs your support to live up to its potential.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...