Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

DCM Pang to voters: Don't fall for 'empty' promises

By Queville To

SANDAKAN: Party-less emissary Chief Minister Peter Pang has urged electorate in Batu Sapi not to be shabby by a antithesis possibilities as well as called all their promises 'empty'.

"Time as well as again, antithesis candidate hopefuls will come in a ravel as well as consider they can hoodwink a electorate by creation all sorts of promises...

"But thats all which they have been great for creation promise after promise knowing which they would not have to do it as they would not be inaugurated in a initial place.

But promises done by a Barisan Nasional would regularly be honoured. Some can be delivered rught away whilst others will take a little time. But in a finish they have been delivered, pronounced Pang, who was inaugurated Karamunting assemblyman with BN member Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) though left it after a celebration quarreled with Chief Minister Musa Aman.

On a campaigning route for Linda Tsen, a BN-PBS candidate for Batu Sapi, Pang pronounced a antithesis will remove a by-election.

It wont happen...Opposition will not win this by-election nor will they win in a ubiquitous election. It is wishful thinking on their partial if they consider antithesis can win," stressed a state Youth as well as Sport Minister

Pang pronounced a BN had been you do a great pursuit in Sabah as well as with a lot of concentration now by Kuala Lumpur, there will even be more appropriation for Sabah.

This is what we want as well as what we need. This is being as well as it is happening, distinct a promises antithesis makes, claiming which they will do this as well as they will do which if as well as when they win, he said.

They have been usually day dreaming. And just for a consequence of a little cheap broadside for their leaders, a people get hoodwinked.

He additionally took a appropriate at a two antithesis parties (S! APP as w ell as PKR) disagreeing during a campaign, observant which it was an indicator which a antithesis parties could not work together distinct a BN coalition.

The voters, he said, should give Tsen a opportunity to offer them for a rest of a term so which she can continue a work done by her late father Edmund Chong whose chair in parliament she is now anticipating to fill.

He pronounced Tsen would have a ears as well as await of both a state as well as federal governments as an inaugurated representative as well as which she would ensure a continued development of a constituency.

The money is there for development purposes though usually a right MP would be means to outlay them wisely for a people, he added.

Pang additionally pronounced which voting for a SAPP as well as PKR possibilities would be an practice in being meaningless or senseless as both have been bustling people who would be spending many of their time in Kota Kinabalu, as well as not in Batu Sapi where it mattered most.

Both Yong Teck Lee as well as Ansari Abdullah, a PKR candidate, have been from Kota Kinabalu.


Sabah rights a SAPP afterthought in Batu Sapi

By Joe Fernandez

ANALYSIS Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) boss Yong Teck Lee is severe Chief Minister Musa Aman to a open discuss upon a emanate of Sabah rights. Theres nothing though doubt among Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) members over a emanate of Sabah rights being flogged by SAPP in a debate underway in Batu Sapi, as good as with great reasons.

Yong, they say, is a very reason why Umno is in Sabah currently as good as a states autonomy has been severely compromised subsequently as a result.

When a Mahathir supervision held Jeffrey Kitingan in a 1990s underneath a Internal Security Act (ISA), ostensibly for plotting Sabahs secession, not most of a present champions of state rights together with Yong raised even a whimper in public.

After Jeffreys recover in 1994 during his second two-year tenure underneath a ISA, he confronted Yong over a detention. Yong, afterwards a PBS emissary president, replied which a apprehension (Jeffreys) underneath ISA was a small sacrifice for Sabah.

Jeffreys take was which raising Sabah issues had nothing to do with his detention. The real emanate for Mahathir, according to Jeffrey, was Yong convincing an additional emissary president, Bernard Giluk Dompok, which PBS should pull out from a statute Barisan Nasional (BN). Both afterwards prevailed upon Chief Minister Joseph Pairin Kitingan to have which fatal decision upon a eve of a general Election in 1990. Jeffrey was held underneath a ISA to punish Pairin.

The PBS pullout from BN gave Mahathir a forgive which he had been waiting for to send Umno in to Sabah. The emanate of Sabah rights was consigned to a dustbin by a federal government. The rest is history.

Yong was additionally instrumental in Umno seizing control of Sabah in 1994 from PBS after a latter had successfully fought a state choosing for an rare fourth term. This was notwiths! tanding Yong deserting a celebration upon a eve of a state choosing as good as getting a registration of SAPP approved inside of 24 hours. Yong shaped SAPP as good as aligned himself with Umno in a state choosing after Pairin rejected his demand which he (Yong) be since a disdainful right to name all a Chinese PBS candidates.

Pairin had improved claim

Pairin, reportedly Sabahs best chess player, did not want Yong to pack PBS with usually his supporters as good as omit alternative Chinese leaders. Moreover, Yongs demand out of a blue fuelled a penetrating in Pairin which a former programmed to flee after a state choosing as good as group up with Umno.

In any case, Yongs SAPP won less Chinese seats than PBS as good as proved which he could not claim to be a undisputed personality of a village in Sabah. Pairin as good as PBS had an even improved claim.

Yongs domestic mischief-making did not finish however with his partys gloomy three-seat performance in a 1994 state choosing to bolster Umnos 20-seat win.

Yong called upon Sng Chee Hwa, a same Sarawak tycoon who took him to see Mahathir Mohamad as good as had SAPP approved, to assistance plot a rain of a one-month-old PBS government. The moneybags came in from Labuan as good besides Sarawak. It was not prolonged before both Dompok as good as Joseph Kurup were lured away from PBS to form their own parties as good as have common means with Umno-SAPP. Other state assemblypersons from PBS joined Umno.

Yong was a kingpin after a Pairin administration fell as good as even went upon to become Chief Minister for dual years in a state supervision dominated ever since afterwards by Umno. The emanate of Sabah rights never crossed his mind.

Yong was additionally disqualified in a Likas choosing petition in 1999 over a electoral rolls being padded with bootleg immigrants land MyKads released via a backdoor. After a setback, a Election Commission had a law passed in Parliament to state which no choosing! result can be challenged once gazetted.

After Likas, Yong had no chair whether in a state assembly or Parliament until Batu Sapi presented itself. Yong has been in a domestic cold for a prolonged spell as good as hopes which he can redeem himself in Batu Sapi by harping upon Sabah rights.

Main plank

Hence, its ironic which Yong currently should have Sabah rights a categorical plank of his debate in Batu Sapi. His challenge to an Umno arch apportion upon Sabah rights holds no water. An Umno arch apportion cannot be approaching to stand up for Sabah rights.

Yong has a lot of explaining to do upon a autonomy of Sabah being compromised by his assorted acts of commission as good as omission, overtly as good as covertly, after he had a great 10-year run in PBS. He should explain what Umno is you do in Sabah today. He was willing to rabble PBS in a process of facilitating a entrance of a Peninsular Malaysia-based Umno in to Sabah. Now, he sheds crocodile tears over Sabah rights after having finished in a most absolute local celebration ever to dominate a governing body of a state.

Yong is treading upon a minefield with his emphasis upon Sabah rights. PBS does not have to explain what it has finished so far for Sabah rights. The celebration was in a forefront with its Sabah for Sabahans debate thesis from 1985. Yong has since borrowed a thesis for Batu Sapi ensuing in Musa Aman labeling his approach as out-dated.

All PBS has to do is to tell a people which it was you do good upon a emanate of Sabah rights until Yong teamed up with a statute Malay elite in Kuala Lumpur as good as threw a tool in a works.

Now, PBSs options upon Sabah rights have been limited as a member of a BN. It was this realization which led to Pairin advising his brother, Jeffrey, to have his own independent waves upon a emanate of Sabah rights.

Jeffrey appears to be you do good upon which measure notwithstanding distractions like which acted by Yong trying to hija! ck a ema nate of Sabah rights for his self-indulgent agenda.

BN leaders, too, generally from Dompoks United PasokMomogun KadazanDusunMurut Organisation (Upko), have additionally jumped upon a bandwagon of Sabah rights. Cynics swear which this is because they have been left out from a spoils of office. All it takes is a little federal supervision projects to be channelled their approach to overpower them upon a emanate of Sabah rights.


Anwars lawyers to prosecution: Show all evidence

Karpal: Any document used by the prosecution must be served to the defence...if its mandatory to be supplied before trial, it automatically must follow it cant be produced during the course of the trial.

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 29 Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim will know on November 22 if he gets to see medical notes which his lawyers argue the prosecution needs to produce along with all evidence, even if it is detrimental to their case.

The High Court fixed that date to deliver the decision if the handwritten notes of three Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) doctors will be made available to the defence team for the Opposition Leader in his sodomy trial.

Judge Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah said so after an hour-long submission by lead defence lawyer Karpal Singh, who said that Mohd Zabidin should take his time to form a proper judgment with detailed explanation. The three HKL doctors handwritten medical examination notes were recorded during a three-hour examination of Saiful on June 28, 2008.

Earlier on during the trial, Karpal told the court that it needed to review an earlier decision made which disallowed Anwars team access to the medical notes.

The white-haired lawyer-cum-politician explained that the credibility of SP2-Dr Razali Ibrahim (one of the three doctors) hinged on the data and materials in the medical notes, and that the defence would be able to scrutinise his judgment on the examination of Sodomy II accuser Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan should they be furnished with the said notes.

Even if the defence is not entitled to material, your lordship should demand it..your lordship would be abdicating your duty if your lordship does nothing about it, said Karpal.

The veteran lawyer said that the defence team was acting on a hunch that they would be able to prove that the tes! timony o f Dr Razali as well as the other doctors would be contradicted by their own handwritten medical notes.

Even a kindergarten kid can tell a two-liner is not a detailed report. Hence, the court should provide us with the clinical notes for us to prove and possibly challenge the witness testimony, claimed Karpal.

He then took a shot at Dr Razali, saying that he was evasive during the defences cross-examination and did not make any sense whatsoever.

He refused to refer to notes to refresh his memory, said Karpal, alleging that the witness did it to deny the defence a chance to look at the notes.

Besides that, Karpal also demanded that Saifuls toxicology reports be rendered inadmissible because the prosecution did not supply it to the defence prior to or even during the trial.

We say that the document cannot be used for any purpose whatsoever. It is inadmissible because it was not supplied to us prior or during the commencement of the trial.

Any document used by the prosecution must be served to the defence...if its mandatory to be supplied before trial, it automatically must follow it cant be produced during the course of the trial, added Karpal.

In response, Solicitor-General II Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden said that the defence could not demand for the medical notes based on a hunchalone, and must show material contradiction and evidence of discrepancy to justify their application.

So far the defence has not shown any material contradiction or unexplained circumstances (to ask for the medical report) and (yet)challenged the witness testimony, said Yusof.

Yusof also added that the chemist who prepared the toxicology report has yet to be called to testify, and the report has not been marked as an exhibit.

He maintained that the medical notes can only be given to the defence team should the prosecutions witness decided to refer to it.

It is wrong that the defence should be given all the latitude as this is the prosecutions case. The witness (D! r Razali ) did not apply to look at the notes, said the lead prosecutor.

Anwar, the 62-year-old PKR de facto leader, is currently facing sodomy charges for the second time in his life.

The former deputy prime minister is charged with sodomising Saiful at Unit 11-5-1 of the Desa Damansara Condominium in Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara here between 3.01pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.

Anwar has denied the charge, describing it as evil, frivolous lies by those in power when the charge was read out to him. He is charged under section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years jail and whipping upon conviction. The trial is taking place 18 months after Anwar was charged in court in August 2008.

He was charged with sodomy and corruption in 1998 after he was sacked from the Cabinet and was later convicted and jailed for both offences. He was freed in September 2004 and later resurrected his political career by winning back his Permatang Pauh parliamentary seat in a by-election in 2008, which had been held in the interim by his wife.

He had two years ago led the opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, to a historic sweep of five states and 82 parliamentary seats in Election 2008. - Malaysian Insider


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Petrified Baram natives want 'dam plan' scrapped

By Joseph Tawie

MIRI: Some 20,000 inland natives of Kayan, Kenyah, Saben as well as Penan communities vital in a Baram division have been frightened to listen to about a saturated fast-flowing Rajang River drying up, a materialisation blamed in part to a seizure of a argumentative Bakun dam which began upon October 13.

The astonishing dry spell as well as a continuous seizure has caused infinite wretchedness as well as hardship for those vital along a Kapit, Belaga, Nanga Merit as well as Pelagus areas.

Never before have a Baram residents ever heard of a Rajang River drying up or seen such a thing, pronounced Philip Jau, chairman of Baram Protection Action Committee in a matter to FMT.

We dont want this (dry up) to happen to a Baram River, if a construction of Baram dam is to proceed, he said.

The committee thus demands which a supervision scrap a plan to build a Baram dam which has a capacity of 1,000 MW. Otherwise at slightest 20,000 inland Kayan, Kenyah, Kelabit, Saben as well as Penan communities from hundreds of longhouses as well as villages situated along a Baram River valley will be influenced as well as displaced, he said.

Jau pronounced a infancy of a communities vital in Baram "strongly as well as vehemently conflict a Baram dam" as well as additionally all a alternative planned as well as now under construction dams via Sarawak. He pronounced a state had some-more than enough supply of appetite even without these one some-more dams.

Not consulted

Jau pronounced which a Baram residents were never consulted about a construction of a Baram dam.

Even yet it is still in a formulation stage, a people have a right to know as well as to decide whether to agree or disagree with a project, he said, pointing out which if all a planned 12 dams as well as Bakun Dam have been operational, Sarawak would have an insane vol! ume of o ver-abundance physical phenomenon or 600% surplus.

"The appetite generated from Bakun Dam alone is some-more than enough to energy Sarawak, he said.

The Baram dam is expected to submerge an area of 38,900 hectares (389 sq km) of land as well as forest. The area is mostly local customary land, as well as consists of temuda, cultivated lands, gardens, villages, churches, graveyards, village forests as well as sites of historical significance.

The people have been going to lose their longhouses, villages, properties, lands as well as forests as well as a story as a outcome of submergence as well as banishment by a Baram dam.

The dam will additionally submerge a existent supervision schools, healing clinics, airstrip as well as alternative office building facilities which a supervision have outlayed a lot of tax payers income on.

The longhouse/villages downstream influenced by a Baram Dam have been Long Laput, Sungai Dua, Sri Kenawan, Uma Bawang, Long Miri (Daleh Pelutan), Long Pilah as well as Long Kesseh.

In a upstream as well as within a dam reservoir area have been Long Naah, Long Liam, Long San, Long Selatong (Kiri & Kanan), Long Apu, Long Julan Asal, Long Julan Pelutan, Long Anap, Long Palai, Long Jeeh, Long Moh, Long Selaan as well as Long Semiyang as well as some villages in Akah River which have been Long Beku, Ba Abang, Long Tap as well as Long Tebangan.


The Linda Tsen candidacy: Where did it come from?

linda-tseng-batu-sapiCOMMENT On the day Linda Tsen would have celebrated her 26th wedding anniversary, she was at the Basel Christian Church of Malaysia in Likas, for her husbands funeral. None of us can even begin to imagine the range of emotions going through this young woman. Fewer still will want to contemplate the difficulties of her assimilation into her new life.

For someone who was widowed a fortnight ago, Linda has shown remarkable courage. With four children, the youngest at 13 years-old, this lady has had to guide her family through a difficult period of mourning for her husband, Edmund Chong Ket Wah, the Batu Sapi MP.

During the eulogy for her father, 18-year-old daughter Steffi, said, My dad was a romantic, who would hold my mums hands or put his arm around her when they walked together. He took her to Paris on her birthday and last year they went to China for their 25th wedding anniversary. Today, is their 26th, but dad is not here to celebrate with mum.

Those words must have been very poignant and heart wrenching for Linda - to bury her husband on the day that would have been a joyous celebration.

For any woman or man, who has lost their spouse, the loss is unbearable. Some have described the pain as like losing a limb. Others have described it as a great loneliness. A few withdraw into themselves because the pain is too intense.

Lindas husband, Edmund, was the PBS treasurer general and a two-term MP for Batu Sapi, an area of 25,582 voters including 1,535 postal voters. They are roughly 54% male and 46% female, and made up of 59% (15,099) Muslim bumiputera, 38% (9,737) Chinese, 2.7% (689) non-Muslim bumiputera and 0.2% (57) others.

Edmund was tragically killed in a motor-accident on 9 October and was buried on 14 October. A week later, the chief minister, Musa ! Aman, na med Linda as the BN candidate in the by-election triggered by her husbands death.

Edmunds loss will be keenly felt not just by Linda and her children, but also the wider community where her husband was MP.

The question on everyones lips must be, Was Lindas decision to offer herself as the BN candidate her own or was she manipulated into running by the party seniority?

If it was the former, then we should respect her decision to do so. Maybe this is her own way of coping with her grief, to immerse herself in the people whom her husband, whose duty it was, chose to serve.

Going to the ground, to capture the hearts and minds of the voters in the same way her husband did, may be a form of therapy and diversion for her. Maybe she is trying to recapture the spirit of her husband, by involving herself in activities that were familiar to him.

If Linda feels she has made the right decision to offer herself for candidacy, then so be it. We must leave her alone and respect her own reasons for doing so.

However, if her decision was because BN finds it convenient to manipulate a grieving woman during the most difficult time of her life, then Linda should not be party to their machinations and political skull-duggery.

If this is the case, then BN is wrong to use Linda because they are piggy-backing on the memory of her husband. Maybe Musa Hassan should search his conscience and think hard about this grieving woman and her family. Is he asking her to run because she wants to do it, or because it is politically expedient for Musa and BN?

Maybe, at the end of the day, it is Linda who has to ask herself these difficult questions.

Bereavement is difficult and to bring up a young family is not an easy task. She will need time to reflect and think about her future. Linda will be wondering how to face up to the responsibilities and the social isolation, with her new identity.

However, she is currently denied doing all that as she has been swept into the ma! d euphor ia of canvassing for votes and meeting the electorate. All this seems unnatural that one wonders, when we observe her face on television and in the papers, if she is stage managing all her emotions just for the benefit of the public. A closer scrutiny of her face reveals the fragile and thin veneer between her public mask and true face.

There are moments when her distant looks and her hesitancy in responding to questions fielded by the hungry press-pack, belies how she really feels. Is it fair of BN to manipulate her for the partys gain?

One minute she is a housewife, devoted mother and part-time piano teacher; the next minute she is projected as the 'giant' and superwoman, who will restore BN's glory. They are expecting far too much of her in such a short, concentrated space of time.

BN knows that once the fuss and rigorous schedule are all over and an MP is selected (whether or not it is her is immaterial), Linda will be on her own to contemplate her future moves.

This is the time she will start to properly mourn the loss of her husband, in private, after having to postpone the grieving period and set aside her feelings, just for the by-election.

This is potentially a dangerous time as the rawness of her husbands loss, returns.

Her children need her as much as she needs them. No one can understand the pain they are going through, individually and collectively. Grief is an isolating experience and only they can set the pace of recovering from their loss.

Maybe BN and the wider community should search their consciences and realise that Linda Tsen is first and foremost, a grieving wife and mother, and they should leave her alone to grieve in peace. - Malaysian Mirror

Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

Introducing Andre Vltchek: The West Perfecting Its Techniques To Hurt China

October 29, 2010

http://www.zcommunications.org

The West Perfecting Its Techniques To Hurt China

by Andre Vltchek* (From Z)

Have no illusions: the Nobel Peace Prize that has been awarded this year (2010) to Liu Xiaobo, the primary drafter of Charter 08, has nothing to do with human rights. It is a direct attempt to harm the largest non-Western economy and socio-political system in the world.

The West has absolutely no interest in human rights in China or anywhere else. How could it, considering that it is violating them on basically all continents, worldwide? Human rights are camouflaging the Wests support for every group of people willing to antagonize, fight against or destroy any country or state that is Communist or Socialist by name or by deeds.

Support for human rights is often synonymous with direct intervention in internal affairs, a hostile act against sovereign nation or with actually oppressing human rights or forcing a country to the brink of civil war. This approach had been perfected in Nicaragua, Cuba and Chile, among many other places and it is now being put to work in an attempt to destabilize China.

Support for human rights groups helped to bring down Soviet Union, it destroyed at one point almost all revolutions and popular movements in Latin America (except in Cuba) and it was used as justification for some of the most horrid interventions (by the West), that included acts of mass murder/genocide against people of Vietnam and Laos.

Tactics that were at work to first discredit and then destroy all Communist and Socialist, progressive and nationalist states, governments and movements including So! viet Uni on, Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea, Chile, Tanzania, and recently Venezuela are considered useful until this day. Now they are more refined, (more people and technology are involved) and much more effective than anytime in the past. After all, the task that Western global dictatorship defined for itself is tremendous: China the most populated nation on earth.

The fact that China is historically peaceful, non-confrontational and very successful makes the task much more difficult. On top of it, China violates human rights much lesser than all Western allies in Asia Pacific including Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand and definitely much lesser than the West itself. After all, the West is presently (indirectly) involved in massacres in Congo/DRC (at least 5 million have died there), in destabilizing entire Horn of Africa and parts of Latin America and in aggressive wars in Iraq, Afghanistan to name just a few lethal adventures.

To discredit China takes enormous effort, but it seems that no task is too great for those in the West who would happily sacrifice the entire earth for their unbridled desire to control and rule.

Equipped with the world language, limitless funds and absolute access to, and control over, the media, Western propaganda planners are managing to twist facts and manipulate global public opinion. In the meantime, China is playing clean and fair, hoping that its good intentions, deeds and non-confrontationist attitude will win friends and allies. But in our world controlled by colonial and post-colonial empires with hundreds of years of experience in conquering and oppressing the planet being good and peaceful is not always a guarantee for avoiding confrontation, even for survival!

The Western population is increasingly hostile towards China and it is not because it knows about it or understands it,! but bec ause of propaganda by which it is being bombarded day and night. Tens of thousands of men and women in media and academia have no other purpose in professional life than to bash China; to discredit it, to make it appear as evil. China bashing is now an excellent career, one of the best ways to get academic or research grants or rise in media corporate ladder.

Public has almost no alternative sources of information. What Noam Chomsky calls Manufacturing of Consensus is now close to sad but successful completion. Unless some people are very much determined to find alternative sources of information and unless they are fluent in searching for them (tiny minority of the population even in Europe and North America), they will be simply spoon-fed by thousand times repeated lies, manipulative half-truths and clichs about China, about non-Western and even Western (self proclaimed democratic) world. They will not have to search for their own world-view it will be cooked and served to them as pre-cooked meal.

Almost no place on earth is free from propaganda produced by global Western regime. In Africa where China offers great alternative to Western plundering (by building schools, social centers, hospital, government buildings, roads and railways), many local people feel deep gratitude towards this enormous Communist country that says it wants to be a friend to developing world. In Kenya I heard testimonies of hundreds of workers on Chinese projects saying that they were treated like human beings by foreigners for the first time, and that they never had to negotiate wages with the Chinese bosses as they were offered 3 times higher salaries than they expected right from the beginning. However, more positively China gets involved in Africa (or in Oceania or in many other places in the world) more it has to face dark sarcasm and attacks of the Western media outlets that pervert and drag through dirt all attemp! ts to cr eate alternative world where solidarity and internationalism stands above pragmatic interests.

Local newspapers in Africa and elsewhere are overzealously printing pieces tailored for local consumption but designed and paid for from abroad. Journalists who join anti-Chinese choir get rewards frequent trips abroad for training, awards and visas to the West. The same is happening in Oceania and in Southeast Asia. Temptations are too great, punishments for stepping out of line too harsh.

People see concretely what China is doing, explains Mwandawiro Mghanga, former Kenyan MP, member of Defense and Foreign Relations Committees, poet and prisoner of conscience under brutal pro-Western regime of former dictator Moi. If you travel throughout the country, youll see Chinese constructing and building roads, stadiums and housing projects which are very good. They are also very closely involved with people in spite of all propaganda being spread by the West. The reality of what China is doing is being seen and appreciated by our citizens. But there is great pressure on Kenyan government not to cooperate with China. In fact, there is great hostility towards Kenya the West is punishing this country for having relatively close ties with PRC.

Thats the standard the way we democratically rule the world (we force, corrupt and if we find it necessary depose the governments), but you hardly hear it from local politicians. And god forbid, do not associate these practices with violations of human rights or with infringing democracy abroad!

During Moi dictatorship, regime that can be described as politically and economically very pro Western), Mr. Mandawiro and tens of thousands of other Kenyan activists, opposition politicians and dissidents were savagely tortured. He stood firm, he fought for his country but he never received Nobel Peac! e Price.

Pramoedya Ananta Toer the greatest Indonesian writer who spent more than ten years in Buru concentration camp died without receiving Nobel Price for either peace or literature. Naturally, the concentration camp he was locked in was our own concentration camp our ally Suharto who killed between 2 and 3 million people after 1965 US-sponsored coup built it. Most of those killed were Communists, people belonging to Chinese minority, opposition intellectuals, atheists and teachers! Before he passed away, Pramoedya shared with me his Marxist ideals and the fact that for decades he was defending people of Chinese minority in Indonesia. That had not qualified his for any Nobel Price. He was not even a member of civil society or pro-Western NGO!

None of the men and women resisting beastly military dictatorship in Chile ever came close to receiving Novel Peace Price. Pinochets men were killing and raping on our (Western) orders. Why would one of our institutions give more than a million dollars to those who would want to stop the carnage? Instead, Nobel Peace Price was given to Henry Kissinger who was one of the masterminds of Chilean carnage.

Western institutions simply do not make mistakes, or at least not too many. The art of manipulation had been perfected throughout the centuries. Philosophy, logic and the language itself had all been twisted, while analytical thoughts were discouraged. Idols had been erected and analyzing them in depth was discouraged. Solzhenitsyn, former feudal lord Dalai Lama and now the new one: Liu Xiaobo! The same year the Nobel Price for Literature has been awarded to Maria Vargas Llosa, originally Peruvian, naturalized Spanish anti-Communist novelist who is definitely much more admired in Europe than in his native land.

And dont you dare to ridicule the idols! Our press only dares to laugh at M! uslim sa ints, not at our own. Manufacturing our heroes (read: heroes who serve our political and economic interest) is sacred act that can never be ridiculed. Naturally, our media can and is expected to ridicule all iconic figures, symbols, even the songs of Latin American, Chinese or Russian revolution. In the meantime it wrapped our anti-Communist and anti-Left Wing heroes in such velvety gowns and attach such divine auras and qualities to their existence that almost nobody who cares about his or her reputation, career or even safety would dare to analyze true motives behind actions of these saints!

You see, the President of Rwanda Paul Kagame is a good man and there can be no discussion about it. He did not attack his own country Rwanda from Uganda on several occasions; he did not kill hundreds of thousands of people in Congo and Rwanda (Do you have proof have you been there? Do you have footage of rapes and massacres? Well, actually, I have some proof and some footage, but that is beside the point). If you disagree that Kagame is a good chap, you are denying genocide of 1994. Why? Well simply because he is our man; because his troops are for years killing on our behalf in DRC/Congo. Now that the UN Report claims that Rwanda and Uganda might have committed another genocide in Congo, we keep quiet, hoping that the storm will pass and that main donors to the UN (us the West plus our former colony and present ally Japan) will manage to maneuver the UN to withdraw the document or at least to rephrase the findings something that was already partially done, given that servile attitude of Secretary General of the UN Ban Ki Moon. Do we give Nobel Peace prize to Rwandan opposition? Not in a blue moon, although their leaders were murdered, imprisoned and some disappeared before the recent Presidential elections. Mr Kagame is our friend and people like Tony Blair former British PM are his personal advisors! Mr. Tony Blair may one day get his ! Nobel Pe ace Prize, too, but definitely not Rwandan opposition.

Do we award Novel Peace Price to Thai dissidents? Our friendly Thai establishment recently murdered many of them some were shot from the roofs by snipers; shot to their heads. (I have footage, I was there do you want to see? Are you interested to see how friendly and peaceful were opposition Thai Red Shirts?) Of course, the Prime Minister who ordered the carnage is British-born and British-educated man. He is real gentleman, our gentleman. The US born Thai monarch may be, even according to the US press, the most corrupt king of 20th century, but he made sure that his country killed so many Communists and Leftists that we have no choice but to love him and to protect him from any criticism at home or abroad. He also helped us to bomb Vietnam and Laos, so who cares about human rights. Nobel Peace Price to Thai opposition? Get lost! Dont make silly jokes!

Or maybe we should give Nobel Peace Price to poor indigenous Papuan freedom fighters? Their country was annexed by Indonesia with our help so our mining and logging companies could plunder it indefinitely, while Indonesian elites were and are building their mansions and employ dozens of drivers, gardeners and maids just for fun as they dont know what to do with all that cash in their impoverished country. Even Western human rights organizations admit that more than 100 thousand Papuans were butchered so far. Suggesting one of them should be awarded Nobel Peace Price? Do you want to get on permanent blacklist of Western mass media, or what?

Then maybe we should consider giving Nobel Peace Price to defenders of democracy in Venezuela to those people who heroically stood against military coup which was organized by the US and had one single purpose to depose democratically elected President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez? Do you see it coming?

!

Let us seriously, once and for all, drop that ridiculous term Human Rights! It is stained by invasions, interferences with internal affairs, by the military coups and consequent killing, torture and rape.

Or if we are not ready to drop it, let us apply it equally, to every state and to every situation. Let us determine who is the greatest violator of such rights! Let us also determine what the term Human Rights means. What are the most basic human rights? Arent they those to life and to self-determination? And if they are, arent we the ones who violated most of them in an ancient and recent history?

Mr. Mwandawiro once declared that many of the NGOs, civil societies and human rights organizations are often serving direct imperialist interests of the West in poor countries. They are Fifth Columns in Venezuela, in Cuba and in China in fact in any country that we are failing to control. Naturally, not all of these organizations are some foreign implants, but many of them are and others are frequently bought and manipulated from outside.

It is natural that if the West would be at least fractionally serious about so called Human Rights, it would stop its own brutal aggressions and foreign wars, it would discontinue supporting the most appalling fascist dictatorships worldwide and it would restrain its companies that are regularly committing murder (direct and indirect) all over the planet murder against mostly defenseless and poor people or, paradoxically, against the genuine defenders of local human rights.

To expect it would be, however, ludicrous! There is nothing altruistic in the Western system of power. The structure is extremely brutal and self-serving. It had no heart and no compassion definitely no solidarity. It already triggered hundreds of wars and conflicts, taking lives of hundreds of millions ! of innoc ent people.

Peaceful and mighty China is naturally a danger to Western expansionism.

The West is panicking. Its panic borders hysteria. It does not clearly know what it is doing. Western planners are using the same tactics to break China as they used to break Chile in 1973 and Indonesia in 1965. They are provoking it and pushing it to the corner as they did with Soviet Union and with Cuba. They try to disseminate propaganda, to discredit the system at home and abroad. They try interventions and infiltrations; they try bribes. They are attempting to isolate China, by encompassing Mongolia and other neighbors to its sphere, even attempting to seduce Vietnam to confrontational attitude towards its enormous neighbor. Nothing seems to work!

It is open and extremely hostile game. Its purpose is to isolate China, provoke it and finally break it, preferably internally.

But the West is dealing with the greatest culture on earth, with over 5.000 years of history. It is dealing with tremendous minds, with intellectuals and strategists people they never encountered as antagonists before.

The most significantly, the Chinese dragon refuses confrontation! It listens to all this frustrating barking down below, to provocateurs and manipulators who ruled the world for centuries and who suddenly feel that they may lose! Chinese dragon listens but keeps walking his own way, certain of its course. For him or for her, the main goal is to lift all of its citizens out of poverty and by doing this to show example to the rest of oppressed world how it could get on its own feet after centuries of subservience to Western colonial rulers. Despite what is said in Western media, the Chinese Dragons skin is rough, but it is not only big but also gentle and caring creature.

! Despite some errors, the Chinese experiment is based on solidarity. Great majority of its citizens are supporting it and that is in essence proof of democratic core of the process. Thats how majority of Chinese people see it and thats all that matters.

China will never again move according to Western puppet-masters. It was already invaded, divided, plundered and raped. Majority of its people will never again trust Western formulas. China has its own system and if its people will believe that it has to be modified, they will make sure to change it at their own pace. They will not need Westerners to tell them how and when to do it. There is no need for it: Western system is morally corrupt as the rest of the planet could testify (if it would be allowed to) and those nations that are free to study it independently are not necessarily eager to face its deadly embrace any longer.

The fury of the West is understandable. For the first time its guns, propaganda and destabilizing tactics seem to be useless and impotent. They do not appear to be able to conquer or to break China. Attempts are plentiful: read Chinese books translated and published in the West: dissidents write 99 percent of them (almost exclusively, dissidents are being published in English). Still it does not work China is in one peace and united. Sour and increasingly irrelevant former colony Hong Kong is allowed (by the West) to shape opinion of foreigners about the country of 1.4 billion inhabitants. It is no secret that Hong Kong bookstores, particularly those at its airport are carrying exclusively anti-Chinese propaganda. In the light of that, Chinese people inside China (PRC) have access to the much more diverse views about their country than those folks living outside and relying on English-language sources (almost all negative and hostile).

Other frustrating factor for the West is that very few Ch! inese pe ople are willing to commit treason. In PRC there is no Suharto, no Yeltcin and no Pinochet in sight no leader or some general willing to sell his country for cash, for booze or for power.

China is patient. It is shockingly patient. The West would never tolerate such direct interventions. Imagine Communist China suddenly and openly supporting Communist Party of the United States that would be planning to overthrow the political system of the United States. In the US and in Europe hundreds of people end up in jail for much smaller crimes. Imagine China actively isolating the United States, bribing and antagonizing governments in Mexico and Canada. Or placing nuclear warheads just one hour flight from its capital!

It seems that citizens in Europe and North America are used to it when such injustice is done (by them) to any other country on earth, but would scream murder would it be directed against them. China seems to be aware of this pathological (Gustav Jung wrote many essays on the topic) mental state in the West its inability to curb longing for control and dominance of the world. By all means, China is very patient and understanding, at least for now. It understands that the West has no way to control its longing for dominating the planet. But there should be a limit. All hostile attempts to destabilize the country should be met with determined resistance of the Dragon who should and will, would there be a need, defend its people and sovereignty.

Granting Nobel Peace Price (1.5 million dollars from the fund of inventor of dynamite) to Chinese opposition figure is grotesque. There are thousands of people resisting Western terror all around the world. They should be noted and rewarded first. Lets not scream: Neighbor has cockroach crawling on his floor if we ourselves are living in a pigsties!

*A! NDRE VL TCHEK writer, filmmaker and journalist. Author of various fiction and non-fiction books including his latest novel Point of No Return and non fiction book about neo-colonialism in South Pacific Oceania. He lives and works in Asia and Africa. http://andrevltchek.weebly.com/


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

More dirt from Auditor's report - this time from PM's backyard

from Malaysia Chronicle

KUALA LUMPUR - As if opening up a Pandora's box, the recently released Auditor-General's Report continues to expose instances of wastages and mismanagement in government finance.

An online portal today reported that among others, the audit report noted that a polytechnic school project in Pekan remained derailed for more than a decade with its cost escalating by 34.6 percent from the original budget.

“The project to develop Politeknik Muadzam Shah is yet to complete for the last 10 years, and today the cost has increased by RM76.74 million, a 34.6 percent increase from the initial cost,” reports Merdeka Review.

Pekan is the parliamentary constituency of prime minister Najib Razak.

The portal also said the project had changed hands from the Education ministry to the Higher Education ministry in 2004, and had been scheduled for completion in September 2003.

“RM294.74 million had been spent on the project compared to the original cost of RM219 million,” the report noted.

Due to delay, the government has been forced to own up the renting cost for tutorial area amounting to RM2,500 a month, totalling some RM130,000 up to December last year, according to the audit report.

Students intake was also affected, between 64 to 347 persons, a far cry from the initial plan to admit 5,000 students.

“The Audit views that the performance and financial position of a company should be the basis of the selection of contractors and subcontractors for the Government to implement the project so that it runs smoothly and does not bring losses to the government in the end,” added Merdeka Review, and said the relevant ministry and the Public Works Department (JKR) must undertake a study to ensure the project was completed according to schedule.

On a related matter, PAS's Shah Alam member of parliament Khalid Samad (right) proposed that a new act be effected in any agreements between the Works ministry and contractors, so that in the event the latter failed to deliver, the Public Works Department (JKR) could take over.

Giving examples during question time in parliament today of how some projects in his constituency had been abandoned due to problems with contractors, Khalid lamented the inaction on the part of JKR.

"In the case of the Shah Alam hospital, is there not an agreement to give the ministry the powers take over the project and act quickly to avoid any delay?

"The Minister said the work had stopped since August but I have visited the construction site and discovered the work stopped in June. The Minister said it needed 30 months to complete," said Khalid. - Harakahdaily

Malaysia towards a failed state and bankrupt nation by 2019

from Malaysia Chronicle

Lim Kit Siang

On Monday, the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak launched the Economic Transformation Programme. It was also the start of a week which saw the Government Transformation Programme suffering a triple blow.


The first blow was Monday’s tabling in Parliament of the 2009 Auditor-General’s Reports which continues to be annual tale of horrors of waste, mismanagement, misuse of public funds and corruption – as highlighted by headlines like:

* Federal government debt hits five-year high;
* KTMB mired in RM1.45 billion debt;
* Only 18.2% of pupils bring free eBooks to school;
* Stimulus funds used for chandeliers, home theatre, government audit shows;
* PTPTN to face whopping RM46 bil deficit;
* PTPTN okayed RM23 mil to students who didn’t apply;
* Million-ringgit scanner stuck in KLIA, under-utilisation woes;
* ‘Sandwich kosong’ for school kids, sardines missing.

The Auditor-General’s Reports, which were completed in June/July this year, were deliberately held back when they should have been tabled on the first day of the budget meeting of Parliament on Oct. 11, clearly to avoid the “annual horror stories” from stealing the thunder from Najib’s 2011 Budget speech on Oct. 15 and his Umno Presidential Address on Oct. 21 – testimony that the Barisan Nasional government is not fully serious and committed to GTP and even Najib’s “People First Performance First” mantra.

The second blow was yesterday when the 2010 Transparency International (TI) Corruption Perception Index (CPI) was released – highlighting the failure of the key National Key Results Area (NKRA) in fighting corruption which targeted to increase the CPI score from the new low of 4.5 in 2009 to 4.9 by 2010. In actual fact, Malaysia’s CPI score in 2010 sunk to the lowest in 16 years.

In the nine years from 1995 to 2003, Tun Dr. Mahathir as Prime Minister saw Malaysia’s TI CPI score stuck in the narrow groove between 4.8 in 2000 to 5.32 in 1996 while the CPI ranking fell 14 places from No. 23 in 1995 to No. 37 in 2003.

In the five-year premiership of Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Malaysia’s TI CPI ranking fell 10 places from 37 in 2003 to 47 placing in 2008, while CPI score stuck between 5.0 to 5.1.

In his 18 months as Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak presided over the worst single-year plunge in TI CPI ranking and score, i.e. a nine-placing fall from No. 47 in 2008 to No. 56 in 2009, with the score plunging to the lowest ever of 4.5 last year. For 2010, Malaysia’s ranking is still at the worst spot of No. 56 hile the CPI score fell further to 4.4

Abdullah’s National Integrity Plan, launched in 2004 with the five-year target to improve Malaysia’s TI CPI from 37th place in 2003 to at least 30th position in 2008 and the 5.2 CPI score for Malaysia in 2003 to at least 6.5 by 2008 was an utter failure but Najib’s 18 months have seen both Malaysia’s TI CPI rank and score plumbed to new depths despite all the fanfare and hulaballoo of GTP, NKRAs and national transformation.

The third blow to Najib’s GTP is today’s release of 2010 Legatum Prosperity Index ranking Malaysia 43rd out of 110 countries, behind Singapore – 17, Japan – 18, Hong Kong – 20, Taiwan – 22, South Korea – 27 though ahead of Thailand – 52, China – 58, Vietnam – 61, Philippines – 64 and Indonesia – 70.

The Legatum Prosperity Index sub-index on “safety and security” ranking Malaysia as No. 52 out of 110 warrants serious attention as it impacts on our international competitiveness as well as another NKRA on keeping crime low.

Based on this sub-index, the publication The Diplomat recently published a photo essay on “The Safest Places in the Asia-Pacific”. The ten safest nations named are firstly Singapore followed by New Zealand, Taiwan, Japan, Australia, Hong Kong, South Korea, Mongolia, Vietnam and Kazakhstan.

The exclusion of Malaysia from this list is a national shame. What has the Prime Minister and the Home Minister got to say?

Both before and after the 2011 Budget presentation on Oct. 15, there have been more world-wide indices adversely affecting Malaysia’s international competitiveness, for example:

* Lowest press freedom index in nine years last week when Malaysia plunged 10 places to 141 in the 2010 World Press Freedom Index – outranked for the first time by Singapore since the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF) began releasing its ranking in 2002.

* World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011 which saw Malaysia falling two places from No. 24 to 26 – despite the warning of the GTP Roadmap in January this year of the nation’s competitiveness “slipping significantly from the top 21 most competitive nations in the world three years ago to our current standing of 24”.

* Malaysian universities falling out of the league of World’s Top 200 universities, whether Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2010-11 or the QS World University Rankings 2010 or Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s 2010 ranking of top 500 universities for the eighth year in a row.

These are not the signs of a country prepared to take a quantum leap to escape the decades-old middle-income trap to achieve inclusive, sustainable high-income developed status in 2020 but those of a country heading towards a failed state or a bankrupt nation in 2019 as warned by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Idris Jala.

Operasi Lalang Anniversary Protest Walk & Wayang Kulit Against the ISA

* This post has been re-published as gentle reminder to all who are able to be part of this event .

Dear Friends,

The 27th of Oct 2010 will mark the 23rd anniversary of Operasi Lalang, a particularly dark time in Malaysian history, when over 100 civil society activists, opposition leaders, academics, religious converts and ordinary civilians were arrested and detained under the ISA in a government crackdown on civil liberties and human rights, derogatorily labeled Ops Lalang.

In view of the fact that the Malaysian government appears no closer to repealing this unjust law, the Abolish ISA Movement UK are organising an ISA Protest Walk & Wayang Kulit on Saturday the 30th of Oct to draw attention and highlight to the international community the injustices that continue to be perpetrated using the ISA.

We will start at the Malaysian High Commission in Belgrave Square at 4pm, aiming to start protesting from 4.15- 4.45pm (Nearest Tube: Hyde Park Corner). Trafalgar Sq where we will protest for a further 30 mins, before the Wayang Kulit show at dusk, ending at 7pm. We will then have a silent, peaceful walk through Green Park, past Constitution Hill and Admiralty Arch, ending at 7p.m.

This is an important time to scale up the international campaign and solidarity work with Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA in Malaysia, given that no further progress has been made by the Malaysian government despite the recommendations of the recent UN Working Group on Arbitrary detention that the ISA should be repealed with immediate effect and a number of promises since April 2009 to 'review' the ISA.

In particular, the Malaysian government seems intent on revamping its international image, with no regard to rectifying and improving its dismal human rights record. We will be showing solidarity with Zunar, the Malaysian cartoonist, famous for his sharp political satire who was recently arrested in a government clampdown in KL, by carrying some of his ISA-inspired cartoons as posters at the protest.

Our symbolic walk past Constitution Hill will be led by two time ISA-detainee, Raja Petra Kamarudin and his outspoken and courageous wife Marina, who has been an inspirational figure in the campaign to release all ISA detainees and abolish the ISA. Marina will also speak briefly about her personal experience as a wife of a former detainee and the devastating impact the ISA has on the spouses, families and friends of those detained.

We look forward to seeing you there.


The Abolish ISA Movement-UK / Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA-UK


Hillary will be in town soon

October 29, 2010

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to visit Kuala Lumpur

by Wong Choon Mei, Malaysia Chronicle

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will arrive in Kuala Lumpur on Monday as part of a two-week Asian tour and the buzz in the diplomatic circles is that she will not only be meeting Prime Minister Najib Razak, but also Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim who is poised to be jailed on flimsy sodomy charges ahead of snap general elections next year.

Indeed, speculation is growing that something might be afoot as the Obama administration has so far been seen as indifferent, even reluctant to take up the democracy cudgels in Southeast Asia, a region marked by many recalcitrant governments including Burma and Cambodia.

We are not in a position to confirm Mrs Clintons schedule but we certainly hope that she will speak up for Anwar, a top PKR official told Malaysia Chronicle.

Malaysian SOS

Like Thailand, Malaysia has been displaying severe signs of stress as it tries to adjust to unprecedented political competition at home.

Unable to beat off the advances made by Anwars Pakatan Rakyat coalition, Najib has begun shifting back to the hard line policies promulgated by former Malaysian dictator Mahathir Mohamad.

While the British-educated Najib has taken pains to portray himself as a moderate during his overseas trips, he is actually the complete opposite once he is back. And nowhere did he exhibit this Jekyll-and-Hyde tendency more than at his UMNO partys annual assembly held recently.

At that meeting, Najib sounded alarm bells far and wide when he declared T! his coun try does not have equal citizenship, clamped down discussion of racial rights, and also vowed to defend his hold on power at all costs.

Even if our bodies are crushed and our lives lost, brothers and sisters, whatever happens, we must defend Putrajaya, Najib had said.

Trial has gone out of control

At 57, Najib is some 6 years younger than Anwar his arch rival from their UMNO days in the 80s. Both had been shortlisted to be Mahathirs deputy, but in the end, the more politically-savvy Anwar was chosen.

Although, they closed ranks and Najib later became part of Anwars clique, he was quick to abandon Anwar in 1998, when Mahathir sensing his grip on power was fading, decided to sack and jail his deputy on graft and sodomy charges.

Even then, there was worldwide condemnation for Malaysia and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, during a dinner function in Kuala Lumpur, even staged a protest walk-out. But it was only after spending 6 years in jail that Anwar was freed. Months after Mahathirs retirement, the courts finally found the courage to acquit him in 2004.

The international rebuke for the latest sodomy trial are even harsher. Anwar has denied the charges and accused Najib and his wife Rosmah Mansor of having plotted the conspiracy against him.

World figures from former Canadian premier Paul Martin to Recep Edrogan, Paul Wolfowitz to Richard Branson, have spoken up for Anwar. Lawmakers from Australian, Canada, U.K., U.S. and most recently the Inter-Parliamentary Union have expressed support for Anwar and pointed out the weaknesses inherent in the ongoing trial.

It has probably reached a stage where Najib is no longer thinking logically about the trial. He seems to be thinking, if the Burmese junta can do it to Aung San Suu Kyi, why cant I get away with Anwar here? Hopefully, som! eone can talk some sense to him, said the PKR official.


Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

1Disco



Source: Kaki Pukul Mamak Parpukari

The Malaysian way - Only I know best!!

from The Middle Ground

Three days have passed in the official campaigning period for the upcoming two by-elections, N45-Galas and P185-Batu Sapi, and I've not made a single comment about these by-elections which is totally out of character with this blog since it was started in July 2008.

What is there to say really?

About the only thing I could think of to comment on is the three-cornered fight in Batu Sapi but that will unfortunately raise the question if Malaysians really want change for a better future? Now that it is so near, can we actually come together and push for that final step towards meaningful change? From looking at what is going on around me currently, it looks tough. It looks tough because those who clamor for change each seems to have their own idea how to bring this about.

I will give you two examples why I said the above.

1. PKR party elections

Of the three parties within PR, it goes without saying that if you have neutral eyes, PKR is the weakest amongst the three but yet the most important to the PR coalition. Most of the frogs come from PKR but yet it is PKR that is keeping DAP and PAS from going at each others throats by being the moderate steadying force.

But how long can they continue to do that when they themselves are having a crisis of sorts with their internal party political battles?

I'm not going into the details of the fight between Zaid and Azmin for PKR's deputy post, as if you are interested enough to search out socio-political blogs to read, you would have already understood what the fight is about. Instead I will tell you what I think of this fight.

I personally believe that this is a fight that ordinary Malaysians, who yearn for change, do not need at this moment in time. Both personalities are needed and a showdown now between the two cannot help but instead hurt the dreams and wishes of those who look to them as a vehicle of change from the tyranny of UMNO/BN.

By this I mean that Azmin is the true political animal and is needed to wield the sword or shield of leadership when taking the party on a charge or retreat when under attack (should Anwar be be incapacitated) as they constantly are. By the same token, Zaid is needed as well as he articulates the idealism which ordinary Malaysians yearn for in PKR and in turn PR. In short, Azmin embodies the belief that there can be no idealistic dreams if the party don't survive first by whatever means and Zaid the party will not survive long enough to bring changes when idealism is forfeited for expediency.

Whilst believing that such a fight is at the wrong time, I accept that it is inevitable if we are to find out the true character of PKR and their leaders. Since it had to happen and is already happening, I decided not to comment on it but rather wait to see the reactions of the loser when the results are known. Will there be magnanimity on the part of the winner? Will there be grace on the part of the loser? Will PKR remain intact and remain the glue that binds PR together? To me this is more important as this is the essence of democracy where we can contest and win or lose but at the end of the day, do we honor the wishes of the majority without threats of breaking away and sabotage internally? Do we take the sock to our ego quietly and instead rally around the winner and his winning philosophy? Only time will tell which is what I was waiting for before commenting but unfortunately events at Batu Sapi forced my hand.

2. Batu Sapi by-election

A three cornered fight! One clueless candidate from PBS/UMNO/BN and a candidate from independent SAPP with the third from PKR/PR. In my humble opinion, the clueless candidate from PBS/UMNO/BN will most probably win not because she is the best but because it is good strategy when I feel bad to condemn the deficiencies of the widow of a good man (by all accounts) despite misplaced loyalties (such is the nature of humanity which we all succumbed to and I'm no different)!

Without wanting to sound insensitive towards a grieving widow, she is the least qualified of all to sit in parliament debating national issues! What is at stake is a place in parliament which is supposed to speak on behalf of us and not simply make up the numbers to allow the executive to do as they please.

Again this is much like the PKR elections example I gave above. Both are needed so why fight now when the common 'enemy' is the clueless one backed by the manipulative ones of PBS/UMNO/BN?

Yong Teck Lee is a dominant personality in local Sabah politics but unfortunately his party is no more than a local based parochial party. Sabah's biggest problem today (as I understand it) are citizen issues. Under our present laws, citizen and immigration issues are federal issues. Does Yong seriously think that by having a single seat in parliament he can solve all these issues? Why can't Yong and SAPP commit to a nationalistic agenda with PR which will see PKR not causing a three way fight in Batu Sapi? Are their terms that awful if you only want a better Malaysia for all 27 million citizens, Sabahans included? Or is it that his only concern is what he thinks is best for Sabah only as if the other non-Sabahan Malaysians don't matter?

When Yong took SAPP out of BN , I had the greatest admiration for him then and even felt sorry for him wondering if Anwar had promised him more than could be delivered.

Today with Malaysia's problems being mostly caused by a centralist UMNO/BN government, shouldn't top priority be given to a common stand to fight the common enemy?

How the hell can we expect change if we remain divided by race, religion, and state, of our own making? That's right, our own making. Unfortunately Malaysia will not change for the better until we can shed this idea that we as individuals know what is best for our kind when our kind should encompass all of humanity!

.................... What more is there to say except to lose the ego!

MCLM’s Social Contract

This was our Agreement, our Contract, THE Social Contract, a Magna Carta of sorts. And that is why we defend this Social Contract in the form of The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration with passion and zeal.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Tomorrow I will be on the road to make my way to London to attend the inaugural meeting of the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) on Saturday. I will also be attending an anti-ISA demonstration at Piccadilly that same afternoon.

I will repeat what I said in my earlier articles. The first and primary objective of the MCLM is to promote and propagate The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration (YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THEM BELOW). This is of course not the only objective of the MCLM, as what I have already explained in great detail in my earlier articles (which you can read here).

1. The Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM)

2. Why the mad scramble

3. When you don’t trust your own people

Now, “why this fixation with The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration?” you may ask. Simple, because this was what was agreed prior to the 2008 general election. Six political parties, three of them within Pakatan Rakyat, signed a Contact with those of us from the civil society movement at the Blog House in Kuala Lumpur (see the photographs below).

We entered into an Agreement and signed a Social Contract with six political parties contesting the last general election. (In fact, we invited ALL the more than 20 political parties to attend the signing ceremony but only six turned up). And we want this Agreement or Social Contract honoured and respected.

This was our Agreement, our Contract, THE Social Contract, a Magna Carta of sorts. And that is why we defend this Social Contract in the form of The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration with passion and zeal. Call us fanatics, if you wish, because that is what we are when it comes to the Social Contract or Magna Carta that we signed with these six political parties.

Then, of course, it was not the MCLM. Then, it was a grouping called Barisan Rakyat. And note that Barisan Rakyat existed before Pakatan Rakyat was created. But now people think that Barisan Rakyat and Pakatan Rakyat are one and the same. Some even think that Barisan Rakyat is a ‘merger’ of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

So, to make it clear that we are not a political party or a wing of Pakatan Rakyat or a merger of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat, we decided to call ourselves the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement, which was actually ‘soft-launched’ six years ago back in 2004 as the Malaysian Civil Liberties Society but never got past the Registrar of Societies.

THE PICTURE GALLERY OF BARISAN RAKYAT SIGNING A SOCIAL CONTRACT WITH SIX POLITICAL PARTIES AT THE BLOG HOUSE PRIOR TO THE 2008 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN THAT FOLLOWED IT

The Barisan Rakyat poster that flooded the country in March 2008

Dr Siti Mariah Mahmud, the representative from PAS

Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew, the representative from DAP

Badrul Hisham Shaharin a.k.a. ‘Chegu Bard’, the representative from PKR

Wee Choo Keong, the representative from MDP

A group photograph of the signatories to The People’s Voice and The People’s Declaration

The Barisan Rakyat campaign team and shots of the election campaign (below)

DOWNLOAD THE PEOPLE’S VOICE AND THE PEOPLE’S DECLARATION HERE

http://mt.m2day.org/The_Peoples_Voice.pdf

http://mt.m2day.org/The_Peoples_Declaration.pdf

http://mt.m2day.org/Deklarasi_Rakyat.pdf

http://mt.m2day.org/Declaration_Chinese.pdf

UMNO Does NOT Need Chinese and Indian Votes to Win, Says UMNO Division Chief


SEE VIDEO CLIP BELOW

QUOTE:

“.... Don't bow down to the Chinese and Indians just because we (UMNO) want to win.

If we (UMNO) want to win in Titiwangsa, we just want Malay votes.

There is no need for Chinese or Indian votes. ”

-Ketua Bahagian Titiwangsa UMNO (Datuk Johari Abdul Ghani)

Popout

MCLMs Social Contract

This was our Agreement, our Contract, THE Social Contract, a Magna Carta of sorts. And that is why we defend this Social Contract in the form of The Peoples Voice and The Peoples Declaration with passion and zeal.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Tomorrow I will be on the road to make my way to London to attend the inaugural meeting of the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) on Saturday. I will also be attending an anti-ISA demonstration at Piccadilly that same afternoon.

I will repeat what I said in my earlier articles. The first and primary objective of the MCLM is to promote and propagate The Peoples Voice and The Peoples Declaration (YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THEM BELOW). This is of course not the only objective of the MCLM, as what I have already explained in great detail in my earlier articles (which you can read here).

1. The Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM)

2. Why the mad scramble

3. When you dont trust your own people

Now, why this fixation with The Peoples Voice and The Peoples Declaration? you may ask. Simple, because this was what was agreed prior to the 2008 general election. Six political parties, three of them within Pakatan Rakyat, signed a Contact with those of us from the civil society movement at the Blog House in Kuala Lumpur (see the photographs below).

We entered into an Agreement and signed a Social Contract with six political parties contesting the last general election. (In fact, we invited ALL the more than 20 political parties to attend the signing ceremony but only six turned up). And we want this Agreement or Social Contract honoured and respected.

This was our Agreement, our Contract, THE Social Co! ntract, a Magna Carta of sorts. And that is why we defend this Social Contract in the form of The Peoples Voice and The Peoples Declaration with passion and zeal. Call us fanatics, if you wish, because that is what we are when it comes to the Social Contract or Magna Carta that we signed with these six political parties.

Then, of course, it was not the MCLM. Then, it was a grouping called Barisan Rakyat. And note that Barisan Rakyat existed before Pakatan Rakyat was created. But now people think that Barisan Rakyat and Pakatan Rakyat are one and the same. Some even think that Barisan Rakyat is a merger of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

So, to make it clear that we are not a political party or a wing of Pakatan Rakyat or a merger of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat, we decided to call ourselves the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement, which was actually soft-launched six years ago back in 2004 as the Malaysian Civil Liberties Society but never got past the Registrar of Societies.

THE PICTURE GALLERY OF BARISAN RAKYAT SIGNING A SOCIAL CONTRACT WITH SIX POLITICAL PARTIES AT THE BLOG HOUSE PRIOR TO THE 2008 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN THAT FOLLOWED IT

The Barisan Rakyat poster that flooded the country in March 2008

Dr Siti Mariah Mahmud, the representative from PAS

Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew, the representative from DAP

Badrul Hisham Shaharin a.k.a. Chegu Bard, the representative from PKR

!

<>Wee Choo Keong, the representative from MDP

A group photograph of the signatories to The Peoples Voice and The Peoples Declaration

The Barisan Rakyat campaign team and shots of the election campaign (below)

DOWNLOAD THE PEOPLES VOICE AND THE PEOPLES DECLARATION HERE

http://mt.m2day.org/The_Peoples_Voice.pdf

http://mt.m2day.org/The_Peoples_Declaration.pdf

http://mt.m2day.org/Deklarasi_Rakyat.pdf

http://mt.m2day.org/Declaration_Chinese.pdf


Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

A legacy of apathy and neglect

By Michael Kaung

SANDAKAN: The Barisan Nasional (BN) bloc government, fighting to forestall a antithesis from creation inroads in to Batu Sapi, is struggling to keep voter anger in check.

In a nine-day sprint to woo a bitter citizens in this huge subdivision that sprawls over an area half a distance of Johor, a BN choosing machine is struggling to placate supporters who had approaching wealth as well as job opportunities to flow in during a prolonged regime.

The antithesis candidates' steady reminders to a electorate of BN's inefficiency have been not creation counts easier.

PKR's Ansari Abdullah as well as a Sabah Progressive Party's (SAPP) Yong Teck Lee have been quick to pounce upon a shortcomings of a BN, portraying a ruling bloc as inefficient as well as corrupt.

Ansari fired a broadside during a BN by questioning what a bloc had finished for a people despite having Chief Minister Musa Aman, Deputy Chief Minister Peter Pang, Federal Deputy Minister VK Liew as well as a late MP Edmund Chong as their inaugurated representatives.

The by-election is widely seen as a referendum upon Musa's own jot down as chief minister as well as Sabah BN chairman. A detriment in Batu Sapi would be a large blow to both him as well as Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) leader Joseph Pairin Kitingan.

Ansari, when releasing a PKR manifesto, accused a BN of being unexcited to a people's gratification after taking power.

He pronounced this could be seen by a purported land grab by a BN-led state supervision in Kampung Perpaduan in 2002-2003.

The encampment was determined during a era of a now-defunct BN component party, Usno. Usno led a state supervision from 1963 (when Sabah gained independence) to 1976.

Land grab

The BN state supervision ordered Kampung Perpaduan demolished in 2002 to make approach for a ! major de velopment project.

Ansari, a lawyer who represented a families of a 3,800 households in a village, claimed that a Sandakan Municipal Council had entered in to a joint try with a association owned by a single Nasir Yeo, allegedly a hopeful of Musa.

"They invited a Sultan of Brunei to invest in a project as well as built two hotels, including a six-star hotel. There is a lot of land in Sabah, so because do we wish to take people's land?" he asked.

The Kampung Perpaduan residents have a legitimate claim to their local customary rights (NCR) land, that has been ignored by a BN government, he said.

"This is recognised by a British... a British have been more concerned about NCR than a BN government," he said, adding that PKR as well as PAS leaders had been harassed as well as incarcerated for defending a villagers' rights.

Ansari as well as Yong's accusations have struck a chord. The subdivision is pockmarked with shabby, shantytown villages by a waterfront, a little of that have been razed to pave a approach for infrastructure projects.

While development projects like roadworks have been welcome, they have, however, displaced a villagers, many of whom have been left but shelter. They have been forced to find a brand new place to put up their squatter shacks.

The bad eke out a vital as fishermen as well as odd-job workers as well as earn in between RM10 as well as RM30 a day. A sizeable number of them have been from a islands that dot a coast as well as have been about half an hour to an hour by speedboat from town.

"The fishermen have been still bad as well as a youths who can means to leave have left to work elsewhere like in Singapore, Kuala Lumpur as well as Kota Kinabalu," pronounced a visit visitor to Sandakan who asked not to be named.

"They live in dirty conditions as well as it's hard to imag! ine that a supervision has not finished anything to improve their vital standards.

"Small businessmen complain that all a projects as well as contracts, even a small ones, have been taken by a politicians as well as their cronies," he said.

"They have been angry with Musa as well as Samsuddin (Yahya), Umnos Sekong assemblyman. All contracts go to Musa's men."

Those who can afford, often a Chinese, have left a locale to live in a housing estates as well as rented out their shophouses to others.

Weekend MP

The list of grouses includes land grabs, water scarcity, poverty, flourishing cronyism as well as dull promises by BN politicians.

BN has not been helped by a fact that Chong was seen as a "weekend politician" that has put his wife Linda Tsen, a BN candidate in a Nov 4 by-election, in a difficult in front of upon a debate trail.

"Her husband's jot down (as an MP) is poor," pronounced Lim, a shopkeeper.

"He was seen as a 'weekend MP' listening to a people only during a weekends.

"All these (BN) politicians have been articulate big... they have just been entrance as well as creation promises as well as promises."

Tsen herself is seen as a "reluctant candidate", according to those attending a BN ceramahs.

"She is safeguarded many of a time from questions by her handlers like Yee (State Resource Development as well as Information Technology Minister Dr Yee Moi Chai).

"She's been unimpressive as well as during a same time, a PBS is during a detriment but any correct machine to get a message across even if it has one. It is depending upon Umno to do a work for them.

"Money will swing a votes here again," pronounced an observer, referring to a vast sums of income that have regularly been allegedly used to buy votes.

"The BN people have already proposed distributing RM30 or so to a poor. They have been bad so RM30 is a lot it's what they can earn in a total day.

"It's all a subject of in! come dur ing a finish of a day this as well as a 'dubious voters' will confirm who win," pronounced a political observer.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...