Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Kempen Burukkan DAP Begitu Aktif Berjalan di Dalam PAS Selangor

Mula2 saya cuma membaca artikel Pak Bakaq/Penarik Beca. Bahawa berlaku kempen memburukkan DAP dan PKR dalam sebuah usrah di rumah HAsan Ali.

NAmun apabila saya mendengar sendiri ucapan Dato Harun Din dalam majlis itu, saya menjadi sangat-sangat kesal dan sedih. Mengapa Dato Harun Din dan PAS Selangor menghabiskan waktu dan masa yang begitu berharga melakukan suatu perkara yang menguntungkan UMNO dan Barisan NAsional.

Malahan, ucapan ini dibuat selepas wafatnya bekas ADUN Galas. Sepatutnya, ucapan ini mengarah kepada persediaan untuk DUN Galas dan bagaimana hendak memenangi DUN Galas.

Namun, ucapan berkisar kepada mengulangi fitnah-fitnah UMNO ke atas rakan PAS dalam PAkatan Rakyat.

Misalnya, fitnah UMNO kononnya berlaku huru-hara dalam Parti Keadilan Rakyat. Hakikatnya, huru hara itu hanya melibatkan 4 cabang PKR dan cabang2 lain seluruh Malaysia berjalan dengan baik.

Berlaku penangguhan 9 cabang pun adalah atas sebab AJK Pemilihan mereka yang tidak bersedia dengan baik. Bukannya sebab pergaduhan atau persengketaan.

Saya terkejut mendengar ceramah Dato Harun Din di usrah di rumah Dato Hasan Ali. Saya begitu terkejut dan begitu kesal dengan kempen memburukkan DAP dan PKR yang begitu aktif dalam PAS Selangor sekarang ini.

Mungkin Dato Harun Din perlu memberitahu mengapa beliau melobi Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai bagi pihak AMONA dan Dato Osman untuk membina Condo 26 tingkat. Sumber saya di Lembah Pantai memberitahu saya rakaman perjumpaan tersebut ada dibuat dan menunggu masa untuk dikeluarkan.

MEngapa Dato Harun Din sanggup menganjurkan perjumpaan dengan Nurul Izzah meminta Nurul Izzah menyokong projek Amona membina Condo 26 tingkat? Mengapa Dato HArun Din boleh pergi melobi projek tersebut bagi pihak seorang korporat UMNO?

Begitu juga DAto Hasan Ali, saya nak tanya bila nak keluarkan laporan bertulis kepada PAS Pusat?

Oleh kerana skrg musim pilihanraya kecil GALAS, saya tidak akan dedah rakaman usrah di kediaman Hasan Ali tersebut.
Itu sahaja buat kali ini

Wallahualam

Tulang Besi

.


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Malays competitive and competent need for New Pro-Poor Economic Policy/Reform

Malaysias Development Strategy Revisited (5)
by Dr. Mohamed Ariff*A New Pro-Poor Economic Policy as well as ReformThere is positively the need for the clear concentration upon the needs of the bad as well as marginalized in any case of race, colour or religion. In alternative words, Malaysia needs the new New Economic Policy that is explicitly pro-poor. The main customer of such the process would still be Malay households, as they comment for rounded off three-quarters of the bottom 40 per cent of households in terms of income distribution.Without the doubt, Malaysia is the single of the better-performing economies in the region, with fairly clever macroeconomic fundamentals. The medium as well as long-term prospects of the manage to buy have been bright. Its fundamental strengths obviously outweigh the viewed weaknesses, that have been by no equates to insurmountable. Malaysia has only itself to censure for being stranded in the middle-income difficulty for so long, as well as high-income standing is within striking distance if process makers have the courage to recognize as well as redress process errors. But there should be no delusion that the tall income is all it takes to become the grown country; Malaysia has the long way to go to climb up the human growth ladder as well.The Malays have been Competitive as well as Competent It would be improper to give the sense that there is very little political space for critical remodel in Malaysia. Fortunately, times have changed. Malays have been just as competitive as well as efficient as anyone else, as well as it would be an insult to Malay intelligence as well as an affront to the Malay essence to contend otherwise. What is more, interjection to increasingly easier access to report by the internet, the mindset of Malay electorate is changing, as is that of their compatriots in alternative racial groups. The subdivision for remodel is flourishing the growth that no polit! ical cel ebration can means to ignore in the democracy.Understandably, there has not been much academic contention or egghead sermon let alone public debate upon the issues confronting Malaysia since the sensitive nature of the topics. Books deliberating such issues candidly as well as objectively have been either dated or in short supply. The benefaction volume, containing plain contributions by eminent writers upon related themes, should help fill the opening with balanced arguments.What distinguishes this book from alternative functions upon the Malaysian manage to buy is the forthright demeanour in that the various issues have been discussed. The insights as well as views of the writers cover the far-reaching spectrum of issues, together with political challenges, corporate ownership as well as control, governance, predicament management, macroeconomic as well as microeconomic policies, service sector reforms, technological upgrading, distributive justice as well as demographic change. Together, they paint the vital contribution towards improved bargain of an increasingly complex Malaysian economy.*Dr. Mohamed Ariff is Professor Emeritus, University of Malaya as well as Distinguished Fellow, Malaysian Institute of Economic Research, Kuala LumpurPreface for the stirring book by Hal Hill, Tham Siew-Yean as well as Ragayah Haji Mat Zin (Editors), GRADUATING FROM THE MIDDLE: MALAYSIAN DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES, Routledge, United Kingd

100 STOREY BUILDING AND 100,000 NOISES!

  • When Najib announced about construction of the 100 storey Menara warisan, I felt my initial comment should be enough to reflect what I felt about the project. I believe I am probably among the first few that highlighted that project has nothing to do with the government. Najib in his excitement to have a big showcase budget had a made a political boo boo. Whoever that prepared the budget speech has most likely to have been reassigned as a kitchen helper.

  • It doesnt take much for an intelligent man to see the opposition that is attacking the project as fools who are as disillusioned as Najib and the same goes with politicians that defended the project. What thing for sure it shows how stupid some of the politicians that we have on both side of the fences. They cant separate a government project and a private sector project. Worst still they purposely misled the nation that this is a project that has a negative impact on the government. Otherwise how else one explains that within a week, 100,000 people has registered with Facebook that is against with the project. From the comment in the facebook, it is clear that a large significant proportion is commenting based on inaccurate information.

  • In my personal view, the 100,000 views probably mean nothing. They should have focused their energy and time against the massive rise in the PM office expenditure. I would not have been so abrasive if these 100,000 people were to question the PM on the massive inflated budget for the PM office. They should have also focused their time and energy I questioning why majority of key opposition political leaders are silent on many issues of the budget. There is many thing wrong with this budget and the 100 storey building has nothing to do with it.

  • PNB Chief has explained that the tower will be built on a piece of land that they bought in 2000 from Danaharta at the price of about RM310million. He also explained that the t! ower con struction will be financed either by borrowings on internal funding depending on which is provides the cheaper cost of funds. Being an investor and unit trust holder since the inception of ASB, I have a very strong faith with the management of PNB. How many unit trust managers in this country with such gigantic funds can give returns of 3-4x more than the banks? Even EPF cannot match them. The only other organization that can beat them is LTAT which consistently pays twice than what PNB gives.

  • I find the statement by Mahfuz Omar is simply irresponsible and shows his weak knowledge of business. For a giant organization like PNB, I sensed that it will be a non issue for them to filled up the tower in such a short time. This is because the various PNB unit managers can easily relocate the various companies HQ into the building. Out of thousands of companies that PNB has majority share, surely they can get 100 companies to fill it up? If I am the owner of PNB, that is what I would do

  • I am a unit trust holder. In my assessment, I gave my full confidence towards PNB management to do what is best in making money using my money. They have not disappointed me so far. To the critics, I would suggest that they focus on issues related to the construction, traffic dispersal as well the other important issues in this country. Unless of course if someone has some evidence to show that Najb and Rosmah wants the tower to be built against PNB advice.

  • I suggest it is better that we use this opportunity to assess the politicians that we have on both side of the fences and the things that they says. See whether we can put our trust in this people to run the country in the next GE. I am not sure if I want to support a man that wants to lead PKR to Putrajaya when he cant seem to do much in Bukit Antarabangsa and has been very silent on many major issues that affects the country.

  • See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Malaysians must reach consensus on 'social contract'



    Clive Kessler

    The nature of the current disagreement about “the social contract” should be clearly identified. Nobody is seriously suggesting that “the social contract” be repudiated, set aside, rejected. Nobody is arguing that it is fictive, a pure fantasy, an illusion. On all sides, everyone in their own way is arguing that it should be honoured, respected and upheld.

    People just need to be clear, and find a way to agree, what its terms were, what “upholding the social contract” means and entails.

    People are broadly agreed that in the years between 1955 and 1957 certain basic inter-ethnic or inter-communal understandings were reached. Through them a national “accord” was solemnly affirmed and politically “enshrined” that made the nation possible.

    Known informally in earlier times as “the Merdeka agreements” or “Merdeka understandings”, these were subsequently, in the 1980s, relabelled, or as people now say “rebranded” with a new identity as “the social contract”.

    Embodied within the constitution, these agreements - this national “accord” or inter-communal “compact” - became the foundation of Malayan, and later Malaysian, nationhood.

    Within the current debates, people on both sides of this question broadly agree on this.

    There is basic disagreement, however, about what those agreements were, what they provided, what their terms precisely specified.

    In retrospect, different parties have construed them differently and have, at times, enlarged or “inflated” the import of those parts of the agreements, or their preferred notions of them, that they found congenial, that seemed to their sectional political liking.

    There is now an urgent need for people on both, indeed all, sides of this question - and all Malaysians generally - to understand what exactly those agreements now designated as “the social contract” in fact were.

    Malaysians need to reach a historically well-founded consensus concerning “the social contract”, what its terms were at the nation's formative moment and in its founding experience, and what it means today and for the future. The coherence, strength and political sustainability of the nation require no less.

    'Ketuanan Melayu' not part of the deal

    It needs to be widely understood that, whatever they provided and mandated, “Ketuanan Melayu” was not part of what those agreements enshrined.

    Any suggestion that Malay political domination in perpetuity, continuing Malay “ethnocratic” ascendancy over other Malayans (and now Malaysians), was any part of those foundational agreements now designated as “the social contract” is simply wrong.

    Those who argue to the contrary that Ketuanan Melayu is a constitutionally guaranteed “foundational” component of Malaysia's national sovereignty and international public identity are disingenuous, mischievous, or simply ill-informed.

    The attempt to “read back” subsequent notions of Ketuanan Melayu into ideas of “the social contract” and in that way to embed them within newly fashioned but quite dubious views of the constitution is simply an exercise in anachronistic revisionism.

    It is the duty of serious historians and legal scholars to say so. - Malaysiakini

    Opposition Leaders React to Najibs Amanat Presiden

    October 22, 2010

    http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com

    Opposition Leaders React to Najibs Amanat Presiden at UMNO General Assembly 2010

    by Wong Choon Mei, Malaysia Chronicle

    In a speech that is bound to raise the already high political-temperature in the country and drive investors further away, Prime Minister Najib Razak used violent language in his opening address to his UMNO party, vowing to defend their five-decade stranglehold on the federal government even if it meant crushed bodies and lost lives.

    This is the most shocking and irresponsible statement to come from a PM although many of us in the opposition have been warning of a major showdown. But it also brings to the fore the fact that Najib is not as confident as he pretends to be. In fact, he is desperate because the chances are very high that UMNO-BN will lose, PAS central committee member Nizar Jamaluddin told Malaysia Chronicle.

    At the 61st UMNO annual assembly, Najib who is the party president was cheered by members as he led them through reverberating shouts of Hidup UMNO (the Malay equivalent ofLong Live UMNO) three times. UMNO pundits had actually been expecting a slightly cooler reaction with many members waiting to grill Najib for his 1Malaysia plan, tepid performance and recent flip-flops over a series of political and economic issues.

    Even if our bodies are crushed and our lives lost, brothers and sisters, whatever happens, we must defend Putrajaya, Malaysiakini reported Najib as saying. Putrajaya is Malaysias administrative capital.

    Racial cleansing

    In his hour-long speech, Najib even warned of the possibility of racial cleansing! such as in Rwanda and Bosnia if unnamed parties continued to challenge and debate the preferential status now enjoyed by the Malays.

    Some of the Pakatan Rakyat leaders who recently and openly debunked UMNOs claim of special rights include PKRs Nurul Izzah Anwar, who created a mini-tsunami in the country with her Malaysia or Malaysaja series of articles. She has challenged Najib, former premier Mahathir Mohamad and ultra-Malay rights group PERKASA chief Ibrahim Ali to public debates, which all three men have shunned.

    Malaysias federal constitution does not state that Malays have special rights or rights that are above the other ethnic groups. However, there are clear provisions that the Malay community is entitled to special positions in the economic and educational sectors.

    Nonetheless, this is not the way Najib or UMNO sees it. They insist that any interpretation other than theirs is an affront to Malay supremacy, although many in the community do not agree with such a stance as it smacks of oppression and racism. Nevertheless, racial supremacy has been the traditional tool used by UMNO to tie the Malay community to it.

    What I am saying is not surprising. In the 20th century, we have seen cases of punishment without trial in the United States, the holocaust tragedy in Europe, the slaughter of Palestinians in the Middle East and the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Rwanda. Imagine, what is the outcome, if every generation of Malaysians question the social contract which were agreed upon by their forefathers, said Najib.

    Pakatan calls for calm

    Meanwhile, Pakatan leaders have called on Malaysians to stay calm and ignore Najibs invective. They slammed him for the grossest hypocrisy, pointing to his maiden speech to United Nations last month where he called for moderation and even offered Malaysias help in creating a m! ovement of moderates over extremists.

    Shame on Najib for trying to frighten the people. This is the worst type of scare-mongering and bullying. If the people are still not convinced by now that he and his UMNO-BN must go, then this speech will convince them, PAS leader Dr Hatta Ramli told Malaysia Chronicle.

    If Malaysians decide to change for the better, no one can stop the landslide, so stop the drama. Najib only shows his fear and hysteria of impending rejection by the people. He has degenerated so far down the line that he is even bragging to UMNO that he is willing to use force to thwart the wishes of the rakyat (citizenry). And the sad thing is, UMNO members are themselves deceived by this racial emotionalism.

    Malaysias 28 million population is expected to go to the polls again in early 2011. At the 2008 general election, the people gave Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim and his Pakatan coalition control of 5 out of 13 states. Significantly, they also withdrew UMNO-BNs long-held two-thirds parliamentary majority. This majority has been blamed for the rampant corruption and abuse of power by the ruling elite as it gave them the power to ram through whatever laws they wished.

    Malays form about half the countrys population, indigenous people about 10 percent, Chinese 28, Indians about 10 percent and rest by unlisted ethnic groups.

    Pre-empting criticism from UMNO members

    Political support amongst the Malays is split between UMNO, PAS and PKR. Chinese have abandoned BNs MCA and Gerakan in droves and are expected to vote for the Pakatan in the next election. Indians and the Bumi or indigenous people are harder to read as both have traditionally been BN loyalists, although the Indians switched over to the Pakatan in 2008.

    Despite rosy popularity surveys by pro-government bodies, there is also a growing number of pundits who believe that Najib may dissolve Parliament next year, but not the BN-controlled state governments so that he will not lose ! all shou ld the people decide to go for change.

    Some also believe Najib was trying to deflect UMNOs attention from his weak performance and leadership by swinging sharply to the right and trying to out race-champion his deputy Muhyiddin Yassin, who is also the Deputy Prime Minister.

    Dissolving just the Parliament is one theory that is making the rounds. But it is hard to tell. The fact is Najib is a political coward. He may even decide not to call for a GE next year. What he is trying to do now is to rally support for himself from UMNO members and GE is always an effective way, Batu MP Tian Chua told Malaysia Chronicle.

    UMNO members will get so hyped up by his speech, they may forget to blast him for his non-performance and flip-flops. He has been in power for nearly two years but has achieved nothing other than spending millions on expensive public relations and wasteful mega-projects. But whatever his strategy, he will not be able to fend off a challenge from Muhyiddin in the UMNO election next year.



    Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

    Najib's speech at 61st Umno General Assembly



    By Bernama

    In every crisis, Umno has managed to bounce back and stabilise the situation where all odds seemed stacked against us.

    All this is because the members and leaders of Umno continued to have their feet planted firmly on the ground. All this is possible because the members and leaders of Umno never for a moment lost confidence in the true struggles of the party or lost hope in its leaders. The basic fact was that the noble principles of Umno had not only benefited the Malays but all Malaysians as well.

    KUALA LUMPUR (Oct 21, 2010): Following is the full text of the speech by Prime Minister and Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Razak at the 61st Umno General Assembly at the Putra World Trade Centre, here today.

    I begin my speech by inviting you to ponder two edicts of Allah SWT.

    In Surah al-Baqarah, verse143, reads:

    "And so we have made you a Muslim, part of the community at the centre in order that you be witnesses over mankind and the Messenger, who is Muhammad, to be a witness of your actions."

    In surah ali-Imran, verse 159 also contains the edict which says:

    "It was by the grace of Almighty Allah, you deal gently with them. If you are being hard-hearted, they would stay away from you. In view of that, do pardon them. Ask forgiveness for them and engage with them. "

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    Indeed, we are grateful to Allah SWT for His blessing that we are gathered once again in this august hall. Let us pray for the blessings of Prophet Muhammad the venerable leader and for always showing us the way.

    If we are to undertake a count, then this 61st General Assembly marks the 25th time that the assembly is being held here since 1985. Therefore, UMNO has come along away into adulthood since it started with tiny steps and then marching along the way over time.

    In the meantime, whether consciously or not, for over six decades UMNO has lit the torch for the advancement of the Malays and safeguarding the interests of the nation. In this regard, we wish to state emphatically that over the past the 64 years, the United Malays National Organisation or UMNO, has been the only shiny torch looking after the interests and soul of the Malays.

    For this reason, no one can deny the massive influence and role of the party for generations where its leadership had faced various odds and challenges while being the driver of change in the country.

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    What we are striving for today, is not something new. Instead, it is a continuation of the aspirations of the Malays and Malaysians when we made the decision to seek independence. Therefore, since then, three major principles and beliefs that we have been consistent is that unity of the Malays unity as the core of national unity. Second, Islam as Addin and thirdly the prosperity of the nation as the pillar of social justice.

    If we are to ascertain this, it was in the early 50's that the President of UMNO then, the late Dato’ Onn Jaafar promoted the idea for the party’s membership to be opened to non-Malays as he saw the reality, in that independence could not be achieved without the various races agreeing to share power.

    However, the Dato 'Onn’s proposal at the time was deemed as too progressive for UMNO members who felt the position of the Malays was still not that strong. As a result, it was opposed by the majority of UMNO members and leaders. In the end, Dato 'Onn had to leave UMNO and went on to set up the Independence of Malaya Party set to continue with his goal.

    In spite of this, the people in Umno have this to say:

    Hidup sebumbung, di bawah teratak, Berlain bantal, satu hati, Bercerai kasih, bertalak tidak, Ibarat rambut, bersimpul mati.

    On the other hand, although the idea by Dato 'Onn at the time was not acceptable by UMNO, his successor, the late Tunku Abdul Rahman, was aware of the importance of multi-ethnic political cooperation to achieve independence. Tunku then took on a strategy that was more realistic and acceptable by the majority of the Malays and others by pioneering an alliance among the various races.

    The partnership which came into being in 1955 through a power-sharing partnership via the Alliance was by gathering UMNO, MCA and MIC, respectively to represent the interests of the Malays, Chinese and Indians. After the tragedy of May 13, 1969, the country's leaders then realised that unity cannot be nurtured by only using political mechanisms without being underpinned by socio-economic foundations and social justice.

    As such, the late Tun Abdul Razak formulated and implemented the New Economic Policy with the aim of addressing the socio-economic disparities between the races that nearly destroyed the fabric of national unity. This new economic approach was made possible by the dynamism of the market system laid down by the late Tunku earlier.

    Brothers and Sisters,

    Here, I would like to draw the attention to some of us and others who might have overlooked that the New Economic Policy was in fact based on the principle to foster national unity. The only difference was that the basic tools used were socioeconomic in nature, and not purely political as was done previously by the leadership through the Alliance.

    In the same breath, Tun Razak did not forget the importance of political mechanisms as tools to foster unity. He enlarged the base from the Alliance to establish Barisan Nasional or the National Front. Through this foundation of cooperation and power sharing of power between the races, it was also extended to the states of Sabah and Sarawak.

    Let us not forget that the first “bridge” built between the states in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak over the South China Sea was the political bridge of Barisan Nasional , 11 years after the establishment of Malaysia. It was later reinforced by the presence of UMNO in Sabah, the Land Below the Wind, in 1991.

    When the New Economic Policy ended in 1990, Tun Dr. Mahathir, the Prime Minister at that time, defined a policy directing the country towards becoming a developed nation by 2020. Through a working paper entitled "Malaysia: Moving Forward", which was delivered at the launch of the Malaysian Business Council on Feb 28, 1991, he envisioned that Malaysia will become a developed country within three decades.

    At that time, the aspiration was such that by 2020, Malaysia will enjoy the same living standards as the United States. The per capita income of the United States at that time was about US$20,000. Although we do know that there were certain quarters who claimed that the goal was mere a fantasy like that of the proverbial Mat Jenin, Tun Dr Mahathir’s argument was strong and neat. He had stated that during the NEP period, the average annual growth of the nation was 6.7 percent. If within a period of30 years to 2020 when growth could be increased to 7.0 percent, which was 0.3 percent more than the years between 1971 and 1990, then that aspiration was not impossible.

    In addition to economic aspects, he also outlined nine more socio-political challenges before Vision 2020 could be realised. The most important was strengthening national unity to forge Bangsa Malaysia. The experience from the New Economic Policy showed that equitable distribution of wealth can only happen amidst a robust economy.

    What is very clear here, in order to ensure national unity, two mechanisms, political and socio-economic, should converge. This means that national unity would not be effective without social justice and social justice cannot be created without political stability and economic prosperity based on national unity. In short, these three elements are complementary, interrelated and will mutually reinforce each other.

    Brothers and Sisters,

    Having been entrusted to lead the party and country about 18 months ago when Tun Abdullah handed over power in line with the UMNO tradition of harmonious continuity within its leadership, I have decided not to reinvent the wheel but to take the examples of the wisdom and foresight of the past leadership in the party and country through a formula that has already been tried and tested over time.

    As such, this gave birth to the philosophy of 1Malaysia, a pragmatic continuation of the vision of our forefathers in the party and government. National unity is a dynamic thing. It should always fertilised and nurtured, if not, it will be in tatters. The Alliance was formed in line with the needs of the time, but after the tragedy of May 13, 1969, saw to that model being revitalised through Barisan Nasional and the elements of social justice via the New Economic Policy.

    The result was that the foundations which were laid down by the late Tunku were continued by the late Tun Razak through Barisan Nasional and the New Economic Policy. The late Tun Hussein, who is also known as the Father of Unity, was firm and sincere in undertaking his duties. Later Tun Dr. Mahathir proceeded with the concept of Bangsa Malaysia. Tun Abdullah then followed suit with the building of human capital and strengthening the country's National Mission.

    Brothers and Sisters,

    If national unity, prosperity and social justice are mutually binding and intertwined, then, in addition to 1Malaysia, we have introduced the Government Transformation Plan, or GTP, and 6 NKRAs and Economic Transformation Plan, or ETP, to further build the prosperity and well-being of the people.

    As presented earlier before this, the ETP is a comprehensive plan, covering major guidelines of the New Economic Model and eight strategic initiatives. It also contains a clear direction to 12 NKEAs and precise mechanism of the 10th and 11th Malaysia Plans.

    Again, in this respect again, 1Malaysia is also in line with Islamic values and the spirit reflected by Prophet Muhammad in nation-building as well as the early foundations of the Islamic civilisation in Medina. Communities of various races and religions in Medina then lived in harmony from rules based on a Constitution which prioritised and defended the religions of all parties ad provided justice for all. The Constitution also protected minorities and accorded the freedom of religious practice to those non-Muslims as well.

    Brothers and Sisters,

    Clearly, this is not a new dream. This is the eternal aspiration of the country in the past and in time to come. It ws the idea of the late Dato 'Onn, the ideals of late Tunku Abdul Rahman, the hopes of my late father, Tun Hussein’s desires, aspirations of Tun Dr. Tun Mahathir and Tun Abdullah Badawi’s goals. Certainly, it has become my vision, together with Tan Sri Muhyiddin and colleagues in UMNO, Barisan Nasional and the government.

    I am confident and believe that it is a noble intention backed by you, ladies and gentlemen who are in this hall and outside this hall, and by all the people of this beloved country. In short, by all, wherever you are, we are 1Malaysia.

    On top of all this, if we are visualise, in the Malay culture, leadership comes in many forms. Starting from the leadership in the households, villages right up to the leadership of the community and nation. Due to their important influence in life, leaders are entrusted with the responsibility of leading the people as reflected in the phrase "the custom holds on to the trust of the people, never backstab, the custom holds on to the belief of power, never destroy, and never forget your boundaries”.

    At this juncture, although there may ups and downs, bitterness, criticisms heaped upon UMNO by the Opposition, history has clearly shown that we have lasted more than 60 years of service, assistance and devotion towards the development of the Malays as well as nation. In addition, the ability and integrity of UMNO was not only acknowledged in this region but the world over.

    Indeed, for over decades, what was said by us was not an empty promise. This can be seen from the records in the country, this party has transformed disunity into unity, from colonial mindsets of the past to independent thoughts, from a lack of self-confidence at one time to one of self-confidence which we are all proud of, and from one of despair to full of hopes for the future.

    Let us not forget, this party has been tasked to change Malays who were not politically conscious before World War II to a nation that was able to gain independence through negotiations with one of the world’s major powers, Britain.

    In addition, the neatly-arranged records in the country will also show that UMNO had raised the consciousness of nationalism, patriotism and political democracy. In the big picture, it has been proven that the UMNO leadership had succeeded in leading the speedy transformation of Malaysia that we enjoy today.

    In listing the stories of our achievements, we would like to ask, who had successfully led in this great struggle? What was the value system? The question here is that we do not want to be pondering over our past successes , but examine what had been the strengths and factors that had been fundamental to the sturdiness of our organisation.

    In this context, it would be appropriate if I recited some poetry by National Laureate, the late Usman Awang, and some gurindam by another literary giant, Effendy Tenas, who wrote about the Malays.

    Melayu itu kaya falsafahnya
    Melayu itu orang yang bijaksana
    Akal budi bersulamkan daya

    Jawa itu Melayu
    Bugis itu Melayu
    Banjar juga disebut Melayu
    Minangkabau memang Melayu
    Keturunan Acheh adalah Melayu,

    Jakun dan Sakai asli Melayu
    Arab dan Pakistani semua Melayu
    Mamak dan Malbari serap ke Melayu
    Malah muallaf bertakrif Melayu

    Kadazan, Bajau, India Muslim dan Siam
    Melanau, Bidayuh dan berpuluh suku kaum
    Kita bersama dalam serumpun

    Watak Melayu menolak permusuhan
    Setia dan sabar tiada sempadan

    Maruah dan agama dihina jangan
    Hebat amuknya tak kenal lawan

    Menjadi pemimpin sifatnya agung
    Syarak dipakai adat dijunjung

    Hidupnya mengabdi kepada rakyat
    Taat setia membela umat

    Dijadikan induk kuat berdiri
    Umat sentosa bertuahlah negeri.

    Based on the lines that I just recited, it just go to show that in the psychology, behaviour or the character of the Malay, the fundamentals are reflected in the seeds of moral leadership. If explored further, the Malays accord a high placing on the refined attitude of leaders and their leadership in the community.

    Evidently, the Malays have stood the test of time. Their character has also enabled Malays to be accepted as leaders in a multicultural society. Their moral leadership has also provided for that they take on the leadership of the nation.

    What is more elegant is that the features of Malay leadership that I am talking about, had been further refined with the arrival of Islam that had called for and supported the wasatiyah approach, which is a principle of the practice of life by individuals and society in a balanced and comprehensive manner in all fields, especially in matters concerning unity and nationhood.

    Since then, and from time to time, the teachings of the Quran and the Sunnah had been embroidered and woven neatly in the daily life of the Malays. Since then up to now, the values of the Malays, is filled with the principle of wasatiyah or the middle way. According to scholars, those who practice the wasatiyah way are those who are not only just noted for their ability to work hard for their well-being in the world and the hereafter.

    Brothers and sisters,

    Subsequently, the most important thing to remember is that, in determining the survival a nation, we need the right leadership style and honest understanding of its concept, especially in a unique country like Malaysia.

    In this regard, we should be grateful that Malaysia, a multi-racial and multi-religious country, remains stable and free of any major conflict. Hence, every person should accept that racial diversity is a blessing and a gift from Allah.

    Indeed, pluralism is a source of strength for us. This is how the world has always been and how it will remain forever. What is important is how do we leverage this asset for the country's success.

    In this context, all parties need to open their hearts. Although we practice affirmative action to ensure social justice, the success of an individual is limited only by his or her creativity, innovation and willingness to work hard and take risks.

    For example, non-Bumiputeras, after 39 years of affirmative action, are still the race with the greatest wealth. We are aware that certain quarters claim that affirmative action had caused hardship. However, empirical evidence showed otherwise. In fact, the attitude of beneficiaries, methods of implementation and the landscape of action were source of the problems.

    Brothers and sisters,

    Furthermore, when certain quarters began to question the position of the Malays as a race that is protected by certain rights, it caused anger and discontent among us who are noted for our accommodating nature. Like an amber in a padi husk, this feeling is starting to burn and may spread to damage the harmonious race relations that have long been forged.

    Unfortunately, after 53 years of Independence, today the people of Malaysia face a relentless onslaught on the foundations of sound relations among communities that have existed for so long. If the national polemics is not handled well, we fear it might threaten national unity.

    For this reason, brothers an sisters, we must remain vigilant, we must continue to remind ourselves that the success of our beloved land has been made possible by the contributions, ideas and sacrifices of the various races. It was not the deeds or ideas exclusively of one race but the collective efforts of all communities from which we reap the harvest.

    What will become a problem is when history is ignored and irresponsible parties try to reinterpret it to suit their narrow interests or agendas.

    Opportunist leaders, fishing in muddy waters, are really foxes disguised as chicken, playing with fire to manipulate the situation, are to be rejected in leadership. They are not qualified to be called leaders.

    Brothers and sisters

    Be mindful of the dream merchants who tell fairy tales, becoming swashbucklers who twist falsehood, weave hatred, trade defamatory, blend honey with poison, and ridicule sacrifices and without any shame invite us to enjoy the low-hanging khuldi fruits to the extend of gambling everything.

    Brothers and sisters,

    Taking off from there, the Malays are particularly hurt that the pledge sealed at the advent of Independence is recant. Whereas it was on the basis of this pact that we were willing to make major sacrifices, sharing Malaya with other races, to achieve Independence.

    At the same time, the acceptance of citizenship that is based on the principle of jus soli or right over the birthplace of jus sanguinis principle, that is the blood right, has transformed overnight the Malay socio-political landscape forever.

    That is why, we can no longer be imprisoned in the story of the past without looking to the future. The basic question here, as the principle of integrity, any contract made under the rule of law, if not respected, will mean no certainty at all even for basic things that have been agreed together. The business analogy is that the parties that break promises will no longer be trusted.

    Furthermore, if a pledge of loyalty is discarded as one pleases when it no longer suits certain tastes or interests, mutual trust and respect will be destroyed and we will be infected with suspicion when we going one another's motive and sincerity. It is endemic and dangerous, I repeat, very dangerous to a country with diverse races, religions and cultures such as Malaysia as it can destroy all that was built over the past 50 years.

    One thing is for sure, the countervalance to all this is not only from the Malays but other races as well. It is manifested through moral consensus, that is, in exchange for citizenship, the non-Malays were willing to accept the principle of special privileges as provided under the provisions of Article 153 of the Federal Constitution. Then Malaysian citizenship was in principle no longer based on equal rights and opportunities but has been adapted to the existing reality for the sake of long-term national goals and interests.

    Brothers and sisters,

    This is actually the core of the contract sealed by consensus by our founding fathers who represented the various races at the start of Independence. It was later enacted as a national social contract, sealed in the Federal Constitution which is the supreme law of the country. Like it or not, we must respect the noble consensus since that is the key to national survival.

    Now, as the present generation of leadership, we have been entrusted to cope with the demands of this monumental era, as the first generation of leaders who are faced with the challenge of building a foundation of diversity. Therefore, it is highly irresponsible if we chose the way of folding our arms and sitting passively without doing anything. Worse still, if we leave these responsibilities to future generations of leaders to shoulder.

    As such, we must build a new runway in the Malaysian race relations by taking into account two important principles. First, it should be based on a shared future, and secondly, it must take into account the realities of history without losing sight of today's and the future's potential.

    Brothers and sisters

    Indeed, people do not live in an utopia. Mankind cannot escape from reality and the environment. Malaysia is a country based on the principles enshrined in the constitution and the rule of law as the national ideology as espoused in the five principles of Rukun Negara.

    As we know, the position of the Malays and the Bumiputera and other races in terms of politics has been clearly enshrined in the Constitution. It is neatly locked in Article 3 on citizenship, Article 38 on the Conference of Rulers, Article 152 on the national language and Article 153 which include, among others, reserve quota services and permit for the Malays.

    Next, ladies and gentlemen, we must understand and acknowledge that the amendment to these articles cannot be done without the consent of the Conference of Rulers in accordance with Article 159 of the Federal Constitution. It is strengthened by Article 10 Clause 4 which empowers the Parliament to enact a law prohibiting questioning any matter, rights, status, position, privileges, sovereignty or sovereign rights protected by the provisions of Clause 3, Article 152, Article 153, and Article 181.

    In relation to this matter, let us be informed of how the great polemics today evolved, either on nationality after Independence or special rights of the Malays. In fact, the debate has become academic. This is because in terms of legislation, its provisions have already been expressed and soldered.

    Even a two-thirds majority in Parliament would not enable any party to change anything without the consent of the Conference of Rulers, which comprises nine Malay rulers. In other words, battle cries will be in vain as capitalising on the provisions of citizenship to threaten other races will not work as these are concrete and cannot be repealed even if an emergency is declared.

    Overall, like it or not, there are very strong reasons why these things are not allowed to be amended, except with the consent of the Conference of Rulers. The wisdom is that such provisions are placed outside the forum of discussions. If it is open for debate, we fear that it would spark unrest and incite primordial instinct or natural instincts existing among ethnic groups.

    Above all, Malaysians must realise that history has shown no matter how advanced an economy, how revolutionised a civilisation, how clever humans are and how high the level of tolerance, if primal instincts are not managed properly, we may as a consequence we might witness extreme cruelty fuelled by the darker human traits.

    What I say is not surprising. In the 20th century, we have been shown cases of punishment without trial in the United States, the holocaust tragedy in Europe, the slaughter of Palestinians in West Asia and ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Rwanda. So, one can imagine the result, if each generation of Malaysians take a stand to question the fairness of the national social contract that had been previously sealed by consensus by our predecessors.

    The consequences will be much faster, especially in the borderless world with sophisticated information and communication technology system that is constantly evolving. The crux of the matter, brothers and sisters, why do want to change what has worked so well. Let us not allow what is good to be broken, and what is joined to be cut.

    Brothers and sisters,

    Beyond this situation, as Malays who are the majority, we have a leadership responsibility. The moral responsibility of leadership that extends beyond the interests of our own community. This responsibility has naturally been bestowed on us Malays as the majority forming 67 percent of the population. As I said at the outset of my speech, this provision is validated by historical factors and the attitude of the race itself.

    Thus is the fate of a race chosen to lead a plural society. The continuous trust of the other races should encourage the Malays to constantly improve themselves and become the leading facilitator among tghe races.

    In other words, amid modernism and accelerated globalisation, the question of rights, dignity and origins will not have any meaning if the community is backward and left behind. Consequently the courtesy shown to us and hope placed upon us by others will fade away. As such, we now have to get up and run quickly to justify our role as Malays with prudence and professionalism.

    Brothers and sisters,

    Looking ahead, since the General Assembly in March 2009, various plans and careful planning and strategies had been devised. Therefore, we can no longer procrastinate. To overcome all obstacles, our focus now is on the party's modus operandi. Umno's modus operandi as a political party must change. Even so, Umno must remain steadfast to its original purpose as a Malay mass party expounding the aspirations of the community.

    Admiral Hang Tuah said the Malays will not disappear from the face of the earth. The Malays, especially those from this region, has traversed centuries of ebb and flow. Let it be known, the forthcoming 2011 is not an ordinary year. It marks 500 years since the fall of the Melaka empire. Here, we should learn why a great empire in the Malay Archipelago, once a trading transit point between two continents, had fallen to the Portuguese.

    Ironically, many quarters only focus on the collapse of the Malay empire due to internal betrayal. True, this was part of the reason. But no less important was the great difference in military might and the weapons used.

    What I mean is that the Portuguese had used modern weapons of the time with rifles and artillery while the defenders of Melaka at that time were still using weapons of a bygone era. Although daggers, archers and spears were a symbol of heroism they could not match guns and cannons. That was the convention, the way the world turned.

    Brothers and sisters,

    Therefore, the Malays of the third millennium, the 21st century Malays, must be ready for the era. Rather than being obsessed with rights, the Malay of the 21st century must prepare themselves to take advantage of existing rights. What is the use of quotas, reserves and permits if everything is being wasted. What good is a chance if it is forfeited for short-term profits.

    Hence, the Malays of the 21st century must work hard to build capacity and capability, instead of just thumping their chests exerting that they should be successful as it is their right to succeed. Like it or not, the Malays must face the reality of this century to achieve success.

    We should be glocal Malays. Brothers and sisters, I want to ask, what is lacking of the Malays? The Malays should be able to compete with the best. The Malays should be able to fight with the most powerful. The Malays must be the greatest on the international stage.

    Therefore, as President of Umno I do not want to hear any excuse that the Malays are still weak because of nearly five centuries of colonialism. I, as President of Umno, and my colleagues in the party leadership, are not willing to see the Malays become a nation which goes begging, we do not want to see the Malays become a complacent race. As the maxim goes "small gains will not become a fortune".

    Let me stress, I would like to remind all that the fight today is a battle of the minds and skills. Whoever is wiser, whoever controls information influences the situation. Therefore, do not take the easy way out by becoming dogmatic and satisfied with the form rather than the content.

    Brothers and sisters,

    To all parties: Is it not what had been achieved for 53 years since Independence the result of efforts and leadership of the Malays? Thus, we become suffocated and restless these days when we hear discordant voices that try to belittle the achievements of the Malays. Very true, it is very easy to make insulting remarks as the tongue is boneless. They like to allege that the public service is a pit of inefficiency.

    On the contrary, if the public service is not competent, we would have become a failed nation a long time ago, we will not have developed from a low-income agricultural nation to a modern industrial nation.

    We have proven all these years that we have succeeded without the need to have foreign military bases on our good earth to give us a security umbrella. We also succeeded indisputably as an independent and sovereign nation. We have also succeeded with the various races in building this sacred land.

    Certainly, we have weaknesses, but we have still been able at all times to overcome challenges through our own efforts and in our own way without relying on other countries.

    In facing all this, Umno will deliver on the trust it has been entrusted upon to uphold the interests of the Malays, religion and country. We will not do so merely by poetic words but with various concrete initiatives, programmes and policies.

    Umno will never allow the Malay race to be helpless and strangers in their own country. We are committed to doing not only what is best, but what is right for the Malay diaspora. We cannot afford to sink amidst our awe of the past. In fact, we not only have to deal with external challenges but also challenges from some of our own people who appear willing to gamble everything away for the sake of power.

    As a lesson from all this, Umno members should not lose hope or be filled with despair. Islam strictly prohibits us to give up hope. As members and people of Umno, we should not allow ourselves to be dispirited and wallow in of defeat nor allow Umno to be easily destroyed.

    Hence, in building for the future and in our quest to strengthen the race, we need to go through three phases of recovery. The first and most important phase is to acknowledge the weaknesses and problems faced by us. The second phase is to reflect upon them and find effective remedies to overcome the deficiencies. The third phase is to start working on the recovery plans. What is important is that all three phases must be done properly with attention to detail. Otherwise, the changes and reforms will not succeed.

    Umno is not an ordinary party. Umno was born from the conscience and aspirations of the Malays. Tracing its journey, Umno has gone through many trials and tribulations. In 1951, the President and founder of Umno left the party. Subsequently, PAS was established by a presidential candidate who lost to the late Tunku in an election to replace Datuk 'Onn as the new leader of Umno.

    By 1969, Umno and its partners lost its grip on a two-thirds majority for the first time in Parliament, and at the same time we were confronted with racial riots, and democracy had to be suspended. The world at that time appeared to bid farewell to Umno. 1987 also saw the splitting of the party and racial tension again hit the nation.

    A year later in 1988, we felt very saddened as if we were hit by a bolt of lightning, swooped upon by an eagle, or that we had lost our shelter, when we were forced to receive the bad news that Umno, a party which had done a lot of good in the past, was declared illegal.

    In the late 1990s, not only did we face the international financial crisis, we also saw a political downswing when many Malays no longer supported the party. We were then hit by the frightening political tsunami of 2008.

    Alhamdulillah, despite whatever obstacles or tests, I believe that for those who plod on, persevere and have trust in Allah the Almighty, victory would definitely come. In every crisis, Umno has managed to bounce back and stabilise the situation where all odds seemed stacked against us.

    All this is because the members and leaders of Umno continued to have their feet planted firmly on the ground. All this is possible because the members and leaders of Umno never for a moment lost confidence in the true struggles of the party or lost hope in its leaders. The basic fact was that the noble principles of Umno had not only benefited the Malays but all Malaysians as well.

    In fact, we are the first political party that had dared to expand the voting block - increasing the number of electors to 140,000.Even before we amended the constitution, we had been known for our highly competitive elections.

    These are our noble aims. These are the transparent and noble steps of Umno. These are the heights of Malay aspirations.

    Therefore, can we believe that the prosperity of Malaysia can be sustained if the opposition parties, which are in disarray, were to hold the reins of power? Can the people of Malaysia place their trust on people who think of nothing else but to seek power in the seat of government? Can we leave Malaysia to the traitors of our people and of this beloved nation?

    Indeed, to our members, we place our party’s destiny in your hands. Under your watch, we will endeavour to protect Umno. On your shoulders will the legacy of the United Malays National Organisation live on.

    What's a drizzle when we can brave a downpour What's a storm when we dare face a typhoon What's a flood, when we fear not a tidal wave What's an eclipse when we can light up pitch darkness

    Therefore, let me remind you all, let us not be hit by the poisonous darts from the theatricals of the Opposition which can only bring about failure. Stay steadfast to the party. Be loyal to the banners of Barisan Nasional. Even if we are broken or divorced from the life of the body, brothers and sisters, we must defend Putrajaya at all costs!

    For the sake of Islam, for the sake of the Malays and for the sake of Malaysia. Let us come together to strengthen the race and lead in prosperity. Intoning Bismillahirrahmanirrahim, I hereby declare open the 61st Umno General Assembly 2010. — Bernama

    Bila Bik Mama bikin kecoh,ulamak & mufti UMNO membisu saja...

    Rosmah menghina Islam menerusi penganjuran festival yang berselindung di belakang nama Islam, sedangkan fesyen yang diperagakan tidak sesuai dengan Islam Di mana perginya 40 ulama muda Umno dan mana dia mufti yang selalu tangkas mengeluarkan kenyataan bila berlaku sesuatu peristiwa yang menyebelahi Umno?

    Kenapa ulama muda dalam Umno dan mufti di negeri-negeri membisu tanpa mengeluarkan sesuatu kenyataan yang membela Islam dan mendesak Rosmah Mansor memohon maaf?

    Nak tunggu komen Tuan Mufti Harunsani dan Tuan Mufti Nor Gadot......










    Ini pakaian Islamkah?


    Dalam pada itu bekas mufti Perlis, Dr.Asri Zainal Abidin berkata, Islam tidak menghalang fesyen untuk wanita, tetapi mesti dengan prinsip dan etika yang tersendiri. Penganjuran fesyen pakaian itu tidak salah, tetapi konsep dan pengisiannya IFF itu salah disebabkan tidak memahami prinsip dan etika dalam hal ini, katanya. Menurut Dr Asri, adalah bahaya untuk isteri pemimpin utama negara Islam terlibat dengan hal-hal yang seperti itu kerana ia akan memberikan mesej Islam yang salah kepada dunia.

    Apatah lagi Malaysia dianggap salah sebuah negara Islam yang penting. Kepimpinan negara akan rosak jika isteri-isteri pemimpin utama ini cuba menonjolkan diri sehingga tidak teliti dan tidak lagi memikir buruk baik sesuatu tindakan.

    Perbuatan seperti ini akan merosakkan kepimpinan seseb! uah nega ra yang majoritinya muslim, katanya.

    cheers.
    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Glitter for PM, the gutter for rakyat, says Anwar


    By Hawkeye

    GUA MUSANG: Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim has pledged to keep pressing Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to explain why he needed RM65 million to renovate his residence.

    The people deserved a full clarification, he told about 20,000 people yesterday at a rally where Pakatan Rakyat announced its candidate for the Galas by-election.

    The federal government has been ignoring the controversy surrounding the upgrading of the Prime Minister’s residence, one of the proposals of the 2011 Budget.

    Opposition leaders have been comparing the cost of the proposed renovation to the RM17 million spent during the premiership of Najib Abdul Razak’s predecessor, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

    Anwar described the proposal as a reflection of Umno’s arrogance.

    “Huge sums are spent on palaces when the people are reeling from the high cost of living," he said.

    Pakatan’s candidate for Galas is Dr Zulkefli Mohamed, a 44-year-old physician and surgeon. He is the son of Awang Mohamed, a former state assemblyman for Guchil.

    Zulkefli contested against Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah for the Gua Musang parliamentary seat in 2004 and 2008. He lost in both elections.

    Support for gold dinar

    Anwar also promised voters that Pakatan would lower fuel prices if it won federal power.

    He said the cascading effect of the reduction would help push down the prices of consumer goods.

    He also declared his support for Kelantan Menteri Besar Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat’s effort to popularise the use of the Kelantan gold dinar.

    He urged all Muslim members of DAP, PKR and PAS to purchase the gold dinar coins for use as payment of the customary dowry in Malay Muslim marriages.

    This would generate a market demand for the dinar and help boost the state's economy, he added.

    He said the dinar could become as influential as Bank Islam in the economic life of Muslims in the country.

    Also read:

    PAS picks local doctor for Galas

    PKR still hopeful of going alone in Batu Sapi


    KUALA LUMPUR: Despite the anouncement that both Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) and PKR will go ahead to contest in the Nov 4 Batu Sapi by-election, PKR's outgoing deputy president Syed Husin Ali is still hopeful to convince the Sabah-based party to give way to PKR.

    "It's a pity we cannot avoid a three-cornered fight ... but I am optimistic. There is still time to negotiate and avoid it," he said.

    Yesterday Pakatan Rakyat coalition partner PKR failed to ink a deal SAPP in Sabah.

    In a joint press conference following the closed door meeting, SAPP president Yong Teck Lee and PKR treasurer William Leong said both the opposition parties would go ahead with their plans to field their respective candidates.

    Said Yong: “We do not see any reason for us to change our position. We maintain our decision to contest the Batu Sapi by-election. We also discuss further cooperation with Pakatan in preparation for the general election.”

    The outcome was disappointing to Syed Husin who believes that a three-cornered fight will not augur well for the party.

    Earlier in a common consensus, Pakatan had agreed to field a PKR candidate although PAS vice president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man had expressed the party's interests in contesting Batu Sapi because 61% of the community there were Muslims.

    The BN coalition in Sabah will be representated by a candidate from deputy chief minister Pairin Joseph Kitinggan's Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS).

    The Election Commission has fixed next tuesday for nominations and Nov 4 for the election.

    Batu Sapi seat fell vacant following the demise of representative Edmund Chong Ket Wah who died in an accident in Kota Kinabalu on Oct 9. Chong won the seat with a 3,708 vote majority over independent Chung On Wing.

    Batu Sapi has 25,582 registered voters and BN is hoping to increase their majority this time round.

    Also read:

    SAPP, PKR to face off in match against BN

    Move to boot out Zaid?


    By B Nantha Kumar

    KUALA LUMPUR: The PKR central leadership has been urged to investigate a move to oust supreme council member Zaid Ibrahim from the party.

    Perak PKR member PS Jenapala said that a blogger called UrekaAsia, had allegedly been courted by certain individuals to write deriding reports about Zaid.

    "This is a dirty tactic... even if we dislike someone, we should not scheme his demise.

    "Zaid has his supporters. In fact, one third of the party members, especially the non-Malays, are backing him.

    "If there is someone masterminding moves to get rid of Zaid, then rest assured that there will be trouble and it will be the begining of the end for he party," he said.

    The pro-PKR blog had in a posting yesterday said a representative of “Zuraidah" had approached him during the fasting month and asked him to be a ghost writer for a monthly fee.

    The blogger said his job was to post scathing comments and negative reports about Zaid.

    'Azmin, an Umno man'

    Jenapal, who saw the posting, contacted FMT and said the posting was “incriminating against Zuraidah”, who he believes is Ampang MP Zuraidah Kamaruddin.

    (Zuraidah is strong supporter of Azmin Ali who is contesting the PKR deputy presidency along with Zaid and Mustapha Kamil Ayub.)

    Said Jenapal: "Regardless of who is behind this underhand move, the central committee must investigate such allegations.”

    “PKR is a party that adopts a system of equal justice to all, regardless of position and race. It must be seen to do this."

    Jenapala has also come out in support of Zaid whom certain individuals have claimed as being an Umno plant in PKR.

    "I don't think (PKR de facto leader) Anwar Ibrahim is that stupid. For me, Azmin alone is enough to destroy PKR.

    "What Azmin is doing now clearly shows that he is still an Umno man at heart," he said.

    Najib's speech tells of Umno's nightmare


    By FMT Staff

    KUALA LUMPUR: Umno president Najib Tun Razak's speech at the party general assembly has “clearly spelt” out the party's fears, said PAS information chief Idris Ahmad.

    "Najib's speech puts on record the fear gripping Umno leaders,” he said.

    Yesterday, Najib said in his presidential adress that “even if our bodies are crushed and our lives lost, brothers and sisters, whatever happens, we must defend Putrajaya”. (Walau berkecai tulang dan juga badan, walam bercerai jasad dari nyawa. Saudara saudari, walau apa pun yang terjadi, Putrajaya mesti kita pertahankan.)

    "They are already picturing what will happen to their luxury houses, cars and businesses if Umno loses in the 13th general election.

    "It's not about democracy and people's choice... it's fear and their nightmare," Idris said, adding that Umno must realise that Malaysia is not its ancestral property.

    Main worry

    Idris said Umno leaders were not afraid of the people and were least concerned about Malay rights and whether people have food to eat.

    "They are used to power... now their main worry is themselves. Losing in the next election would be their nightmare!”

    "PAS' hope is that Umno leaders learn to accept loss and failure, because in a democratic country, there are times when you are up and times when you're down," he said.

    Idris also voiced his concern about what BN might do in the event it loses at the general election.

    "I am wondering what Najib meant when he said “...walau apa pun yang terjadi, Putrajaya mesti kita pertahankan!”

    “What happens if BN does not get the majority? Does that mean they will not surrender (administrative) power?”

    “What kind of democracy is that?" he asked, adding that in the past Umno had used dirty tactics to win polls and in the case of Perak, post-2008, it had gone against the people's wishes and made a mockery of the polls results.

    Citing Kelantan, Idris said PAS-ruled Kelantan in 1959 then lost it to BN in 1978.

    "We surrendered power to Umno... we did not cling to it. PAS got re-elected and we returned to rule in 1990 until today.

    "We have had similar experiences in Terengganu. Although at that time emotions among PAS supporters were running high and defeat was difficult to accept, the wisdom of PAS leaders calmed the supporters and we accepted the rakyat's democratic decision.

    "Umno leaders must learn from PAS to respect democracy in the country," he said.

    SAPP, PKR to face off in match against BN


    By Queville To

    PENAMPANG: Pakatan Rakyat and its fellow opposition party Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) are set to face off as they take on the Barisan Nasional in the Batu Sapi parliamentary election on Nov 4.

    Both PKR, one of Pakatan partners, and SAPP today reiterated that they will proceed with their earlier decision to contest in the Batu Sapi by-election.

    SAPP president Yong Teck Lee and PKR treasurer Dr William Leong, during a joint press conference at the Millennium Plaza near here, after a closed-door discussion among leaders of the two parties, stood their ground that both opposition parties would field their respective candidates.

    “We do not see any reason for us to change our position. We maintain our decision to contest the Batu Sapi by-election. We also discuss further cooperation with Pakatan in preparation for
    the general election,” said Yong.

    He said that today’s discussion was not the first and that ever since SAPP left the BN, its leaders has had held discussions on co-operation with Pakatan leaders like Anwar Ibrahim and Azmin Ali, adding that such meetings would continue.

    Both Yong and Leong also agreed that besides “testing the waters”, the imminent “friendly match” between PKR and SAPP would become a “reference point” for the two parties in future talks.

    “The fact that we are talking to each other suggests that the subject is not over. We will continue to discuss but we also understand that there are issues beyond Batu Sapi that we need to look at. Batu Sapi will become our reference point.

    "We will continue to sit down and discuss as there are a lot of issues that we need to thrash out together to ensure that the people of Sabah get a better government,” said Leong.

    Yong said that the Batu Sapi election would serve as good reference points for “our campaign strategies”.

    He added that there were three scenarios to the Batu Sapi story: an overhelming BN victory, BN wins but with less votes than the combined opposition votes and a BN loss.

    “In the first scenario, it means everybody in the opposition will have to go back to the drawing board. If it is the second, every party will see the urgency to forge a better opposition alliance, and if it is the third, then the BN is finished.”

    While stressing that they are there to win, Yong and Leong, however, said that they would not find fault with each other during campaigning.

    “Even before today’s meeting, we briefed our branches in Batu Sapi and Sandakan that our aim is to topple the BN-Umno government.

    "The issues are about the BN leadership and the government. Therefore, our campaigning will be about the BN government and Umno, and not about us” said Yong.

    Leong said PKR would be concentrating on issues and better governance and has no intention of engaging in any personal attacks.

    On the candidate, Yong said SAPP would announce its choice on Saturday in Sandakan, while Leong said PKR would do so anytime now.

    Potential candidates mentioned for the Batu Sapi seat are Sabah PKR chief Ahamd Thamrin Jaini, Tuaran chief Ansari Abdullah, Jeffrey Kitingan, Christina Liew, SAPP deputy president Liew Teck
    Chan, vice-president Amde Sidek and its information chief Chong Pit Fah. All of them attended today's meeting.

    Anti-Rosmah demo on in some places, off in KL


    By Rahmah Ghazali

    FMT ALERT KUALA LUMPUR: PAS' protest against Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's wife Rosmah Mansor took place in several states, except Kuala Lumpur, where it was called off at the eleventh hour.

    This morning, a statement by Federal Territory PAS Youth information chief Fadhil Osman had given the impression that the nationwide protest was scrapped.

    However, the protest took place after Friday prayers in Seremban, Malacca and Terengganu. The protest here was supposed to be held outside the Kampung Baru mosque.

    Fadhil had said that PAS would use "another approach" to express its dissatisfaction against the premier's wife.

    According to him, a meeting would be arranged with the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim) and a memorandum would be submitted to the King soon.

    The self-proclaimed First Lady of Malaysia had come under fire for promoting the recently held Islamic Fashion Festival (IFF), which Muslim groups said was an insult to Islam and the Prophet Muhammad.

    The event also drew flak from social-networking site Facebook users, where the photo of one of the models wearing a revealing outfit which depicted a reverse image of the Prophet's name in Arabic across the chest was widely circulated.

    Also read:


    PAS chides Rosmah over Islamic fashion fest

    Be an effective BN commander, delegate tells Najib


    By G Vinod

    KUALA LUMPUR: An Umno delegate from Negri Sembilan, taking potshots at Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties, today called on Prime Minister and party chief Najib Tun Razak to be an effective "commander" and steer the ruling coalition into the nation's 13th general election.

    Debating the presidential address at the 61st Umno general assembly here, Jalaluddin Alias also wanted all BN component parties to stop playing "psychological war" against each other and work towards strengthening racial harmony among the various races in the country.

    He said Umno, the backbone of the ruling government, should not be the only party to bear the blame for BN's devastating defeat at the March 2008 general election, where the ruling coalition lost its two-thirds majority in Parliament. The BN also lost four states -- Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor -- in the election. Kelantan was also retained by the opposition.

    Since the election, the BN has managed to retain Perak after three state assemblymen pulled out of the opposition to become independent state assemblymen who support the BN.

    Soi Lek reprimanded

    Jalaluddin said the BN's sore defeat at the last general election was not because of Umno but was due to weaknesses and shortfalls of other major component parties.

    “Component party members failed to garner support from their respective communities,” he said, adding that the MCA only managed to retain 40% of seats allocated to the party under the BN banner.

    “As for MIC and PPP, they almost got obliterated,” said Jalaluddin.

    He then reprimanded MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek for not heeding Najib's call not to question the country's social contract.

    “Just yesterday our president urged everyone not to question the social contract and today I saw Chua's commenting on the matter in a daily,” claimed Jalaluddin.

    He then cautioned MCA, the second largest party in BN, that it would be difficult for the Chinese- based party to win seats at the next general election without the support of the Malay community.

    “If MCA fails to get Chinese votes, Umno can still win elections. However, if Umno fails to get Malay support, even MCA cannot win,” said Jalaluddin.

    He then praised party vice-president Shafie Apdal's suggestion to review the current seat quota allocated for each component party to contest in elections and allow a committee to decide on it.

    “For example, if a seat is Malay-majority area but comes under MCA, let Umno contest the seat instead. In return, component party leaders can be made senators for them to become ministers and sit in the Cabinet,” said Jalaluddin.

    Also read:

    Umno raps Soi Lek on Bumi quota -- in Hokkien

    Middlemen making fast buck on Brickfields traders


    By B Nantha Kumar

    KUALA LUMPUR: Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar is urging Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to deal directly with traders in Brickfields.

    She said middlemen had become an incessant problem for traders who do business in the area during Deepavali festival season as they block space and re-rent the lots for a higher rate.

    Speaking to reporters after a routine visit to traders in and around Brickfield yesterday, Nurul said every year the traders complained about doing business in the area during the festive season because of the high rents.

    "Our study has shown that the rents for each lot (with a tent) goes up to RM2,400. This is too high for traders around here.This problem is often repeated because DBKL appoints Kuala Lumpur Indian United Traders Association (Brickfield) as the middleman in the business of renting", she said.

    She added that the original rate for each lot was from RM700 to RM800.

    But the association charges RM2,400 per tent and locates three tenants within this space.

    Several tenants have complained about the squeeze.

    "I feel this is a problem that can be avoided. The traders who come in during the festivities are not big-timers. These are temporary business or starter-ups. The high rents put unnecessary financial pressure on them," she said.

    Easy and transparent

    DBKL has provided 100 lots for temporary business, but the association with an eye on profits has tripled the lots available.

    Nurul said she had sent a letter to DBKL on the matter and had urged the council to investigate the matter.

    "There is no reason for a middleman in this case. DBKL should rent the lots directly to the traders as practised by the Klang Municipal Council.

    "In Klang, all lots are chosen by the traders themselves by drawing lots. In this way, the process becomes easy and transparent," she said.

    Meanwhile, Federal Territories and Urban Well-Being Deputy Minister M Saravanan, who coincidentally was also on visit to Brickfields, assured Nurul that the matter would be looked into.

    FMT contacted the Kuala Lumpur Indian United Traders Association over Nurul's statement but it denied any malpractice.

    Its chairman Gobal Rajee said DBKL only provided tents at RM400 each. He said the association charged RM400 for electricity, garbage collection and administration fee for 30 days.

    Gobal, however, did not elaborate on why the lots were tripled in the first place.

    Nazri: IPU report ‘ridiculous, stupid, short-sighted’


    October 22, 2010

    Nazri said Malaysia may quit the IPU ‘if we are not happy’. — File pic
    KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 22 — The Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) report on Malaysia will not affect the outcome of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s on-going Sodomy II trial, said Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.

    The minister in the Prime Minister’s Department expressed outrage over the report’s stinging criticisms of the way Anwar’s trial was being handled in Malaysia.

    “The statement released by IPU is of no significance and is never ever going to be a factor in determining the result of Anwar’s trial. It is ridiculous, stupid and short-sighted,” said Nazri, who is IPU Malaysia chairman and also de facto law minister.

    The IPU, an international organisation of parliaments, has urged Malaysia to abandon the prosecution of Anwar for sodomy because it claims the case has brought disrepute to the justice system.

    In a special report released in August, the IPU also questioned the alleged direct involvement of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and SAC I Datuk Rodwan Yusof, who had met Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan days before Anwar allegedly sodomised him.

    “The prosecution has obviously been compromised, even by the mere perception that a member of its team has been guilty of wrongdoing. Removing Farah Azlina from the team has not solved the problem because her wrongdoing has tainted the entire prosecution and the integrity of the trial,” Mark Trowell, a Queen’s Counsel based in Australia, wrote in a report on behalf of the IPU.

    Deputy public prosecutor Farah Azlina Latif was in the team prosecuting Anwar when allegations surfaced that she was romantically involved with Saiful.

    However, Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail stressed that the junior prosecutor was removed to prevent negative public perception of the Sodomy II prosecution team.

    In response, Nazri said it was the responsibility of the IPU to respect the independence of Malaysia’s judiciary and not formulate any opinions based on feedback given solely by Anwar’s lawyers.

    “They (IPU) have to respect the independence of any judiciary. Why is this organisation pressuring the judiciary of Malaysia to drop Anwar’s trial?

    “They didn’t send any observers to Anwar’s case. I believe they know nothing except slanted reports given by Anwar’s lawyers or whoever,” Nazri told The Malaysian Insider.

    The law minister warned that Malaysia would have no qualms about leaving the union if it was unhappy with the way it was being treated.

    “IPU should remember that Malaysia, like any other member, is a paying member. Someone who begs for money from its members does not have a right to dictate to people what to do.

    “If we are not happy, we can leave when the time comes,” said the IPU Malaysia chairman.

    Among other things, the report said the alleged involvement of Najib in the trial has brought the country’s justice system into disrepute.

    The report also criticised the A-G for not performing his duty.

    Anwar, the 62-year-old PKR de facto leader, is currently facing sodomy charges for the second time in his life.

    The former deputy prime minister is charged with sodomising Saiful at Unit 11-5-1 of the Desa Damansara Condominium in Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara here between 3.01pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.

    Anwar has denied the charge, describing it as “evil, frivolous lies by those in power” when the charge was read out to him. He is charged under section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years’ jail and whipping upon conviction. The trial is taking place 18 months after Anwar was charged in court in August 2008.

    He was charged with sodomy and corruption in 1998 after he was sacked from the Cabinet and was later convicted and jailed for both offences. He was freed in September 2004 and later resurrected his political career by winning back his Permatang Pauh parliamentary seat in a by-election in 2008, which had been held in the interim by his wife.

    He had earlier led the opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, to a historic sweep of five states and 82 parliamentary seats in Election 2008.

    Recently, two former aides to Anwar revealed that they were coerced into signing statutory declarations to allegedly implicate Najib and his wife in the sodomy case.

    The Federal Court has also denied Anwar access to statements made by the complainant after he claimed that there were inconsistencies between Saiful’s testimony and the sodomy charge frame against him.

    Anwar’s lawyers believe that if the defence were given access to Saiful’s witness statements, it would affect the outcome of the entire trial.

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...