Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

The New York Times-LKY Interview that got KJ hopping mad!

September 14, 2010

Malaysiakini reports:

His (Khairy Jamaluddin) tirade against Lee spanned more than 10 post on Twitter, which limits the number of characters to 140 per post.Khairy called the former Singapore premiers remarks ill-informed and coloured with historical bias.

Lees remarks apart from being biting and insulting, are calculated to divide Malaysians even more, he said in one of his tweets. Khairy gave as an example Lees remarks that unlike Singapore, that suppressed its Chinese culture, Malaysia took a different line of development with Malaysians seeing it as a Malay country where all others are orang tumpangan (lodgers).

He also took issue with Lees criticism of Malaysian Malays hegemony, saying that while Malay is the language of the schools, it does not help them acquire modern knowledge.

Lee said that this was unlike the Singaporean Malays who are English-educated and are very modern and forward looking.

We are different

Khairy in his attack zoomed in on Lees assertion that had Tunku Abdul Rahman managed to keep Singapore within the federation, much of what Singapore has achieved could also have been enjoyed by Malaysia. The Rembau MP argued, We are different and cannot be compared apple to apple with Singapore. To suggest otherwise is ignorant.

NONEKhairy (right) remarked that while Malaysia was geographically extensive and hence its challenges were manifold, Singapore is only limited to Ang Mo Kio and Woodlands.

If we followed the Singaporean model, Malaysia would today be a failed state. We are not practically homogeneous and not the size of a postage stamp, he said.

Khairy lamented that Lees remarks will be met either by more sabre rattling by Malay-rights NGOs like PERKASA or self-criticising statements by those who only see ! the bad side of Malaysia and who want us to emulate the island state.

He said both responses are wrong. Which is why 1Malaysia must succeed. Neither Lees model nor PERKASAs ideas can take Malaysia forward, he said.

If Khairys prediction of a retaliatory barrage is forthcoming, Lees critical outlook of Malaysia in the international publication may worsen the already too chilly cold-war between Malaysia and Singapore that took shape under the Mahathir era.

The enduring friction between the two is something that the Najib administration is trying its best to undo, earning it former premier Mahathir Mohamads criticisms that it is kow-towing to the southern neighbour.

Transcripts New York Times/IHT interview with Lee Kuan Yew

Posted by theonlinecitizen on September 13, 2010

The following is the transcript of the interview Seth Mydans had with Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, for the New York Times and the International Herald Tribune. The interview was held on 1 September 2010.

Mr Lee: Thank you.When you are coming to 87, you are not very happy..

Q:Not.Well you should be glad that youve gotten way past where most of us will get.

Mr Lee: That is my trouble.So, when is the last leaf falling?

Q:Do you feel like that, do you feel like the leaves are coming off?

Mr Lee: Well, yes.I mean I can feel the gradual decline of energy and vitality and I mean generally every year when you know you are not on the same level as last year.But that is life.

Q:My mother used to say never get old.

Mr Lee: Well, there you will try never to think yourself old.I mean I keep fit, I swim, I cycle.

Q:And yoga, is that right? Medita! tion?

Mr Lee: Yes.

Q:Tell me about meditation?

Mr Lee: Well, I started it about two, three years ago when Ng Kok Song, the Chief Investment Officer of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, I knew he was doing meditation.His wife had died but he was completely serene.So, I said, how do you achieve this?He said I meditate everyday and so did my wife and when she was dying of cancer, she was totally serene because she meditated everyday and he gave me a video of her in her last few weeks completely composed completely relaxed and she and him had been meditating for years.Well, I said to him, you teach me.He is a devout Christian.He was taught by a man called Laurence Freeman,a Catholic.His guru was John Main ,a devout Catholic.When I was in London, Ng Kok Song introduced me to Laurence Freeman.In fact, he is coming on Saturday to visit Singapore, and we will do a meditation session.The problem is to keep the monkey mind from running off into all kinds of thoughts.It is most difficult to stay focused on the mantra.The discipline is to have a mantra which you keep repeating in your innermost heart, no need to voice it over and over again throughout the whole period of meditation.The mantra they recommended was a religious one.Ma Ra Na Ta, four syllables.Come To Me Oh Lord Jesus.So I said Okay, I am not a Catholic but I will try.He said you can take any other mantra, Buddhist Om Mi Tuo Fo, and keep repeating it.To me Ma Ran Na Ta is more soothing.So I used Ma Ra Na Ta.You must be disciplined.I find it helps me go to sleep after that.A certain tranquility settles over you.The days pressures and worries are pushed out.Then theres less problem sleeping.I miss it sometimes when I am tired, or have gone out to a dinner and had wine.Then I cannot concentrate.Otherwise I stick to it.

Q:So

Mr Lee: .. for a good meditator will do it for half-an-hour.I do it! for 20 minutes.

Q:So, would you say like your friend who taught you, would you say you are serene?

Mr Lee: Well, not as serene as he is.He has done it for many years and he is a devout Catholic.That makes a difference.He believes in Jesus.He believes in the teachings of the Bible. He has lost his wife, a great calamity.But the wife was serene.He gave me this video to show how meditation helped her in her last few months.I do not think I can achieve his level of serenity.But I do achieve some composure.

Q:And do you find that at this time in your life you do find yourself getting closer to religion of one sort or another?

Mr Lee: I am an agnostic.I was brought up in a traditional Chinese family with ancestor worship.I would go to my grandfathers grave on All Souls Day which is called Qingming.My father would bring me along, lay out food and candles and burn some paper money and kowtow three times over his tombstone.At home on specific days outside the kitchen he would put up two candles with my grandfathers picture.But as I grew up, I questioned this because I think this is superstition.You are gone, you burn paper money, how can he collect the paper money where he is?After my father died, I dropped the practice.My youngest brother baptised my father as a Christian. He did not have the right to. He was a doctor and for the last weeks before my fathers life, he took my father to his house because he was a doctor and was able to keep my father comforted. I do not know if my father was fully aware when he was converted into Christianity.

Q:Converted your father?

Mr Lee: Yes.

Q:Well this happens when you get close to the end.

Mr Lee: Well, but I do not know whether my father agreed.At that time he may have been beyond making a rational decision.My brother assumed that he agreed and converted him.

Q:But

M! r Lee: I am not converted.

Q:But when you reach that stage, you may wonder more than ever what is next?

Mr Lee: Well, what is next, I do not know.Nobody has ever come back.The Muslims say that there are seventy houris, beautiful women up there.But nobody has come back to confirm this.

Q:And you havent converted to Islam, knowing that?

Mr Lee: Most unlikely.The Buddhist believes in transmigration of the soul.If you live a good life, the reward is in your next migration, you will be a good being, not an ugly animal.It is a comforting thought, but my wife and I do not believe in it.She has been for two years bed-ridden, unable to speak after a series of strokes.I am not going to convert her.I am not going to allow anybody to convert her because I know it will be against what she believed in all her life.How do I comfort myself?Well, I say life is just like that.You cant choose how you go unless you are going to take an overdose of sleeping pills, like sodium amytal.For just over two years, she has been inert in bed, but still cognitive.She understands when I talk to her, which I do every night.She keeps awake for me; I tell her about my days work, read her favourite poems.

Q:And what kind of books do you read to her?

Mr Lee: So much of my time is reading things online.The latest book which I want to read or re-read is Kim.It is a beautiful of description of India as it was in Kiplings time.And he had an insight into the Indian mind and it is still basically that same society that I find when I visit India.

Q:When you spoke to Time Magazine a couple of years ago, you said Don Quixote was your favourite?

Mr Lee: Yes, I was just given the book, Don Quixote, a new translation.

Q:But people might find that ironic because he was fantasist who did not realistically choose his projects and you are sort of the opposi! te?

< p>Mr Lee: No, no, you must have something fanciful and a flight of fancy.I had a colleague Rajaratnam who read Sci-Fi for his leisure.

Q:And you?

Mr Lee: No, I do not believe in Sci-Fi.

Q:But you must have something to fantasise.

Mr Lee: Well, at the moment, as I said, I would like to read Kim again.Why I thought of Kim was because I have just been through a list of audio books to choose for my wife. Jane Austen, Emily Bronte, books she has on her book shelf.So, I ticked off the ones I think she would find interesting.The one that caught my eye was Kim. She was into literature, from Alice in Wonderland, to Adventures with a Looking Glass, to Jane Austens Persuasion, Pride and Prejudice, and Sense and Sensibility. Jane Austen was her favourite writer because she wrote elegant and leisurely English prose of the 19th century.The prose flowed beautifully, described the human condition in a graceful way, and rolls off the tongue and in the mind.She enjoyed it.Also Chaucers Canterbury Tales.She was an English Literature major.

Q:You are naming books on the list, not necessarily books you have already read, yes?

Mr Lee: I would have read some of them.

Q:Like a Jane Austen book, or Canterbury Tales?

Mr Lee: No, Canterbury Tales, I had to do it for my second year English Literature course in Raffles College.For a person in the 15th Century, he wrote very modern stuff.I didnt find his English all that archaic.I find those Scottish poets difficult to read.Sometimes I dont make sense of their Scottish brogue.My wife makes sense of them.Then Shakespeares sonnets.

Q:You read those?

Mr Lee: I read those sonnets when I did English literature in my freshmans year.She read them.

Q:When you say she reads them now, youre the one who reads them, yes?

Mr Lee: Yes, I read them to her.

Q:But you go to her.

Mr Lee:Yes, I read from an Anthology of Poems which she has, and several other anthologies. So I know her favourite poems.She had flagged them.I read them to her.

Q:Shes in the hospital?You go to the hospital?

Mr Lee: No, no, shes at home.Weve got a hospital bed and nurses attending to her.We used to share the same room.Now Im staying in the next room.I have to get used to her groans and grunts when shes uncomfortable from a dry throat and they pump in a spray moisture called Biothene which soothes her throat, and they suck out phlegm. Because she cant get up, she cant breathe fully.The phlegm accumulates in the chest but you cant suck it out from the chest, youve got to wait until she coughs and it goes out to her throat.They suck it out, and shes relieved.They sit her up and tap her back.Its very distressing, but thats life.

Q: Yes, your daughter on Sunday wrote a moving column, movingly about the situation referring to you.

Mr Lee: How did you come to read it?

Q: Somebody said youve got to read that column, so I read it.

Mr Lee: You dont get the Straits Times.

Q:I get it online actually.I certainly do, I follow Singapore online and she wrote that the whole family suffers of course from this and she wrote the one whos been hurting the most and is yet carrying on stoically is my father.

Mr Lee: What to do?What else can I do?I cant break down.Life has got to go on.I try to busy myself, but from time to time in idle moments, my mind goes back to the happy days we were up and about together.

Q:When you go to visit her, is that the time when your mind goes back?

Mr Lee: No, not then.My daughters fished out many old photographs for this piece she wrote and picked out a dozen or two dozen photographs from ! the digi tal copies which somebody had kept at the Singapore Press Holdings.When I look at them, I thought how lucky I was.I had 61 years of happiness.Weve got to go sometime, so Im not sure whos going first, whether she or me.So I told her, Ive been looking at the marriage vows of the Christians. The best I read was, To love, to hold and to cherish, in sickness and in health, for better or for worse, till death do us part.I told her I would try and keep you company for as long as I can.She understood.

Q: Yes, its been really.

Mr Lee: What to do?What can you do in this situation?I can say get rid of the nurses.Then the maids wont know how to turn her over and then she gets pneumonia.That ends the suffering.But human beings being what we are, I do the best for her and the best is to give her a competent nurse who moves her, massages her, turns her over, so no bed sores.Ive got a hospital bed with air cushions so no bed sores.Well, thats life.Make her comfortable.

Q: And for yourself, you feel the weight of age more than you have in the past?

Mr Lee: Im not sure.I marginally must have.Its stress.However, I look at it, I mean, its stress.Thats life. But its a different kind of stress from the kind of stress I faced, political stresses.Dire situations for Singapore, dire situations for myself when we broke off from Malaysia, the Malays in Singapore could have rioted and gone for me and they suddenly found themselves back as a minority because the Tunku kicked us out.Thats different, thats intense stress and its over but this is stress which goes on.One doctor told me, you may think that when shes gone youre relieved but youll be sad when shes gone because theres still the human being here, theres still somebody you talk to and she knows what youre saying and youll miss that.Well, I dont know, I havent come to that but I think Ill probably will because its now two years, May, June, July, August, September, two! years a nd four months.Its become a part of my life.

Q:Shes how old now?

Mr Lee: Shes two-and-a-half years older than me, so shes coming on to 90.

Q:But you did make a reference in an interview with Time magazine to something that goes beyond reason as you put it.You referred to the real enemy by Pierre DHarcourt who talked about people surviving the Nazi, its better that they have something to believe in.

Mr Lee: Yes, of course.

Q: And you said that the Communists and the deeply religious fought on and survived.There are some things in the human spirit that are beyond reason.

Mr Lee: I believe that to be true.Look, I saw my friend and cabinet colleague whos a deeply religious Catholic.He was Finance Minister, a fine man.In 1983, he had a heart attack.He was in hospital, in ICU, he improved and was taken out of ICU.Then he had a second heart attack and I knew it was bad.I went to see him and the priest was giving him the last rites as a Catholic.Absolutely fearless, he showed no distress, no fear, the family was around him, his wife and daughters, he had four daughters.With priest delivering the last rites, he knew he was reaching the end.But his mind was clear but absolutely calm.

Q: Well, I am more like you.We dont have something to cling to.

Mr Lee: Thats our problem.

Q:But also the way people see you is supremely reasonable person, reason is the ultimate.

Mr Lee: Well, thats the way Ive been working.

Q:Well, you did mention to Tom Plate, they think they know me but they only know the public me?

Mr Lee: Yeah, the private view is you have emotions for your close members of your family.We are a close family, not just my sons and my wife and my parents but my brothers and my sister.So my youngest brother, a doctor as I to! ld you, he just sent me an email that my second brother was dying of a bleeding colon, diverticulitis.And later the third brother now has got prostate cancer and has spread into his lymph nodes.So I asked whatre the chances of survival.Its not gotten to the bones yet, so theyre doing chemotherapy and if you can prevent it from going into the bones, hell be okay for a few more years.If it does get to the bones, then thats the end.I dont think my brother knows.But Ill probably go and see him.

Q: But you yourself have been fit.You have a stent, you had heart problem late last year but besides that do you have ailments?

Mr Lee: Well, aches and pains of a geriatric person, joints, muscles but allnon-terminal.I go in for a physiotherapy, maintenance once a week, they give me a rub over because when I cycle, my thighsget sore, knees get a little painful, and so the hips.

Q: These are the signs of age.

Mr Lee: Yeah, of course.

Q: Im 64.Im beginning to feel that and I dont like it and I dont want to admit to myself.

Mr Lee: But if you stop exercising, you make it worse.Thats what my doctors tell me, just carry on.When you have these aches and pains, well give you physiotherapy.Ive learnt to use heat pads at home.So after the physiotherapy, once a week, if I feel my thighs are sore, I just have a heat pad there.You put in the microwave oven and you tie it around your thighs or your ankles or your calves.It relieves the pain.

Q:So you continue to cycle.

Mr Lee: Oh yeah.

Q:Treadmill?

Mr Lee: No, I dont do the treadmill.I walk but not always.When Ive cycled enough I dont walk.

Q:Thats your primary exercise, swimming?

Mr Lee: Yeah, I swim everyday, its relaxing.

Q: What other secrets, I see you drink hot water?

Mr Lee: Yes.

Q! : Tell m e about it.

Mr Lee: Well, I used to drink tea but tea is a diuretic, but I didnt know that.I used to drink litres of it.In the 1980s, I was having a conference with Zhou Ziyang who was then Secretary-General of the Communist Party in the Great Hall of the People.The Chinese came in and poured more tea and hot water.I was scoffing it down because it kept my throat moistened, my BP was up because more liquid was in me. Halfway through, I said please stop. Im dashing off.I had to relief myself.Then my doctors said dont you know that tea is a diuretic?I dont like coffee, it gives me a sour stomach, so okay, lets switch to water.

Q: You know you had the hot water when I met you a couple of years ago and after I told my wife about that, she switched to hot water.Shes not sure why except that you drink hot water, so shes decided to.

Mr Lee: Well, cold water, this was from my ENT man.If you drink cold water, you reduce the temperature of your nasal passages and throat and reduce your resistance to coughs and colds.So I take warm water, body temperature.I dont scald myself with boiling hot water.I avoid that.But my daughter puts blocks of ice into her coffee and drinks it up.Shes all right, shes only 50-plus.

Q:Let me ask a question about the outside world a little bit.Singapore is a great success story even though people criticize this and that.When you look back, you can be proud of what youve done and I assume you are.Are there things that you regret, things that you wished you could achieve that you couldnt?

Mr Lee: Well, first I regret having been turfed out of Malaysia.I think if the Tunku had kept us together, what we did in Singapore, had Malaysia accepted a multiracial base for their society, much of what weve achieved in Singapore would be achieved in Malaysia.But not as much because its a much broader base.We would have improved inter-racial re! lations and an improved holistic situation.Now we have a very polarized Malaysia, Malays, Chinese and Indians in separate schools, living separate lives and not really getting on with one another. You read them.Thats bad for us as close neighbours.

Q:So at that time, you found yourself with Singapore and you have transformed it.And my question would be how do you assess your own satisfaction with what youve achieved?What didnt work?

Mr Lee: Well, the greatest satisfaction I had was my colleagues and I, were of that generation who were turfed out of Malaysia suffered two years under a racial policy decided that we will go the other way.We will not as a majority squeeze the minority because once were by ourselves, the Chinese become the majority.We made quite sure whatever your race, language or religion, you are an equal citizen and well drum that into the people and I think our Chinese understand and today we have an integrated society.Our Malays are English-educated, theyre no longer like the Malays in Malaysia and you can see there are some still wearing headscarves but very modern looking.

Q:That doesnt sound like a regret to me.

Mr Lee: No, no, but the regret is theres such a narrow base to build this enormous edifice, so Ive got to tell the next generation, please do not take for granted whats been built.If you forget that this is a small island which we are built upon and reach a 100 storeys high tower block and may go up to 150 if you are wise.But if you believe that its permanent, it will come tumbling down and you will never get a second chance.

Q:I wonder if that is a concern of yours about the next generation.I saw your discussion with a group of young people before the last election and they were saying what they want is a lot of these values from the West, an open political marketplace and even playing field in all of these things and you said well, if th! ats the way you feel, Im very sad.

Mr Lee: Because you play it that way, if you have dissension, if you chose the easy way to Muslim votes and switch to racial politics, this society is finished.The easiest way to get majority vote is vote for me, were Chinese, theyre Indians, theyre Malays.Our society will be ripped apart.If you do not have a cohesive society, you cannot make progress.

Q: But is that a concern that the younger generation doesnt realize as much as it should?

Mr Lee: I believe they have come to believe that this is a natural state of affairs, and they can take liberties with it.They think you can put it on auto-pilot.I know that is never so.We have crafted a set of very intricate rules, no housing blocks shall have more than a percentage of so many Chinese, so many percent Malays, Indians. All are thoroughly mixed.Willy-nilly, your neighbours are Indians, Malays, you go to the same shopping malls, you go to the same schools, the same playing fields, you go up and down the same lifts.We cannot allow segregation.

Q:There are people who think that Singapore may lighten up a little bit when you go, that the rules will become a little looser and if that happens, that might be something thats a concern to you.

Mr Lee: No, you can go looser where its not race, language and religion because those are deeply gut issues and it will surface the moment you start playing on them.Its inevitable, but on other areas, policies, right or wrong, disparity of opportunities, rich and poor, well go ahead.But dont play race, language, religion.Weve got here, weve become cohesive, keep it that way.Weve not used Chinese as a majority language because it will split the population.We have English as our working language, its equal for everybody, and its given us the progress because were connected to the world.If you want to keep your Malay, or your Chinese, or your Tamil, Urdu or! whateve r, do that as a second language, not equal to your first language.Its up to you, how high a standard you want to achieve.

Q:The public view of you is as a very strict, cerebral, unsentimental.Catherine Lim, an authoritarian, no-nonsense manner that has little use for sentiment.

Mr Lee: Shes a novelist, therefore, she simplifies a persons character, make graphic caricature of me.But is anybody that simple or simplistic?

Q:Sentiment though, you dont show that very much in public.

Mr Lee: Well, thats a Chinese ideal.A gentleman in Chinese ideal, the junzi () is someone who is always composed and possessed of himself and doesnt lose his temper and doesnt lose his tongue.Thats what I try to do, except when I got turfed out from Malaysia.Then, I just couldnt help it.

Q:One aspect of the way youve constructed Singapore is a certain level of fear perhaps in the population.You described yourself as a street fighter, knuckle duster and so forth.

Mr Lee: Yes.

Q: And that produces among some people a level of fear and I want to tell you what a taxi driver said when I said I was going to interview you.He said, safer not to ask him anything.If you ask him, somebody will follow you.Were not in politics so just let him do the politics.

Mr Lee: How old is he?

Q: Im sorry, middle aged, I dont know.

Mr Lee: I go out.Im no longer the Prime Minister.I dont have to do the difficult things.Everybody wants to shake my hands, everybody wants me to autograph something. Everybody wants to get around me to take a photo.So its a problem.

Q:Yes but

Mr Lee: Because Im no longer in charge, I dont have to do the hard things.Ive laid the foundation and they know that because of that foundation, theyre enjoying this life.

Q: So when you were the one directly in-charge, you had to! be toug h, you had to be a fighter.

Mr Lee: Yes, of course.I had to fight left-wingers, Communists, pro-Communist groups who had killer squads.If I didnt have the guts and the gumption to take them on, there wouldnt be the Singapore.They would have taken over and it would have collapsed.I also had to fight the Malay Ultras when we were in Malaysia for two years.

Q:Well, you dont have a lot of dissidents in prison but youre known for your libel suits which keeps a lot of people at bay.

Mr Lee: We are non-corrupt.We lead modest lives, so its difficult to malign us.Whats the easy way to get a leader down?Hes a hypocrite, he is corrupt, he pretends to be this when in fact hes that.Thats what theyre trying to do to me.Well, prove it, if what you say is right, then I dont deserve this reputation.Why must you say these things without foundation?Im taking you to court, youve made these allegations, Im open to your cross-examination.

Q:But that may produce what I was talking about, about a level of fear.

Mr Lee: No, youre fearful of a libel suit?Then dont issue these defamatory statements or make them where you have no basis.The Western correspondent, especially those who hop in and hop out got to find something to show that they are impartial, that theyre not just taken in by the Singapore growth story.They say we keep down the opposition, how?Libel suits.Absolute rubbish.We have opponents in Parliament who have attacked us on policy, no libel suits against them and even in Parliament they are privileged to make defamatory allegation and cannot be sued.But they dont. They know it is not true.

Q:Let me ask a last question.Again back to Tom Plate, Im not serious all the time.Everyone needs to have a good laugh now and then to see the funny side of things and to laugh at himself.

Mr Lee: Ye s, of course.

Q:How about that?

Mr Lee: You have to be that.

Q:So what makes you laugh?

Mr Lee: Many things, the absurdity of it, many things in life.Sometimes, I meet witty people, have conversations, they make sharp remarks, I laugh.

Q:And when you laugh at yourself as you said?

Mr Lee: Thats very frequent.Yeah, Im reaching 87, trying to keep fit, presenting a vigorous figure and its an effort and is it worth the effort?I laugh at myself trying to keep a bold front.Its become my habit.I just carry on.

Q:So its the whole broad picture of things that you find funny?

Mr Lee: Yes, life as a whole has many abnormalities, of course.

Q:Your public life together with your private life, what youve done over things people write about you and Singapore, that overall is something that you can find funny?

Mr Lee: Yes, of course.

Q:You made one of the few people who laugh at Singapore.

Mr Lee: Let me give you a Chinese proverb do not judge a man until youve closed his coffin.Do not judge a man.Close the coffin, then decide.Then you assess him.I may still do something foolish before the lid is closed on me.

Q:So youre waiting for the final verdict?

Mr Lee: No, the final verdict will not be in the obituaries.The final verdict will be when the PhD students dig out the archives, read my old papers, assess what my enemies have said, sift the evidence and seek the truth?Im not saying that everything I did was right, but everything I did was for an honourable purpose. I had to do some nasty things, locking fellows up without trial.

Q:For the greater good?

Mr Lee: Well, yes, because otherwise they are running around and causing havoc playing on Chinese language and culture, an! d accusi ng me of destroying Chinese education.Youve not been here when the Communists were running around. They do not believe in the democratic process.They dont believe in one man, one vote.They believe in one bullet, one vote.They had killer squads.But they at the same time had a united front exploiting the democratic game. It gave them cover.But my business, my job was to make sure that they did not succeed.Sometimes you just got to lock the leaders up.They are confusing the people.The reality is that if you allow these people to work up animosity against the government because its keeping down the Chinese language, because weve promoted English, keeping down Chinese culture because you have allowed English literature, and we suppress our Chinese values and the Chinese language, the Chinese press, well, you will break up the society.They harp on these things when they know they are not true.They know that if you actually do in Chinese language and culture, the Chinese will riot and the society must break up.

Q:So leadership is a constant battle?

Mr Lee: In a multiracial situation like this, it is.Malaysia took the different line; Malaysians saw it as a Malay country, all others are lodgers, orang tumpangan, and they the Bumiputras, sons of the soil, run the show.So the Sultans, the Chief Justice and judges, generals, police commissioner, the whole hierarchy is Malay.All the big contracts for Malays.Malay is the language of the schools although it does not get them into modern knowledge.So the Chinese build and find their own independent schools to teach Chinese, the Tamils create their own Tamil schools, which do not get them jobs. Its a most unhappy situation.

Mdm Yeong:I thought that was the last question.

Q:This is the last part of the last question.So your career has been a struggle to keep things going in the right way and youve also said that the best way to keep your health is to keep on wor! king.Are you tired of it by this point?Do you feel like you want to rest?

Mr Lee: No, I dont.I know if I rest Ill slide downhill fast.No, my whole being has been stimulated by the daily challenge.If I suddenly drop it all, play golf, stroll around, watch the sunset, read novels, thats downhill.It is the daily challenge, social contacts, meeting people, people like you, you press me, I answer, when I dont. what have I got tomorrow?

Mdm Yeong:You have two more events coming up. One is the Radin Mas Community.

Mr Lee: Oh yeah. I got it.

Mdm Yeong:And then you have other call, courtesy call on the 3rd.

Mr Lee: We are social animals.Without that interaction with people, you are isolated.The worst punishment you can give a person is the isolation ward. You get hallucinations.Four walls, no books, no nothing.By way of example, Henry Kissinger wants to speak to me.So I said okay, well speak on Sunday.What about?We are meeting in Sao Paolo at a J P Morgan International Advisory Board. He wants to talk to me to check certain facts on China. My mind is kept alive, I go to China once a year at least. I meet Chinese leaders.So its a constant stimulus as I keep up to date.Supposing I sit back, I dont think about China, just watch videos.I am off to Moscow, Kiev and Paris on the 15th of September.Three days Moscow, three days Kiev, four days Paris.Moscow I am involved in the Skolkovo Business School which President Medvedev, when he wasnt President started.I promised to go if he did not fix it in the winter.So they fix it for September.I look at the fires, I said wow this is no good.

Q:Its not going to be freezing if there are fires.

Mr Lee: No but our embassy says the skies have cleared.Kiev because the President has invited me specially and will fly me from Moscow to Kiev and then fly me on to Paris.Paris I am on the TOTAL Advisory Board together with Joe ! Nye and a few others.They want a presentation on what are Chinas strengths and weaknesses.That keeps me alive.Its just not my impressionistic views of China but one that has to be backed by facts and figures. So my team works out the facts and figures, and I check to see if they tally with my impressions.But its a constant stimulus to keep alive, and up-to-date. If I stop it, its downhill.

Q:Well, I hope you continue.Thank you very much, I really enjoyed this interview.


Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

Daydreams that turn disastrous


Najib and Rosmah - their 1Malaysia dream
Richard Loh

A daydream is a visionary fantasy, especially one of happy, pleasant thoughts, hopes or ambitions, imagined as coming to pass, and experienced while awake. There are many different types of daydreams, and there is no consensus definition amongst psychologists. Daydreams may involve fantasies about future scenarios or plans, or reminiscences about past experiences, and may include vivid dream-like mental images. They are often connected with some type of emotion.

While daydreaming has long been derided as a lazy, non-productive pastime, it is now commonly acknowledged that daydreaming can be constructive in some contexts.

Malaysians as well as their leaders have daydreams in the political atmosphere which we can term as political daydreams. In such political daydreams the constructive contexts will be different depending on which side of the divide you are aligned to.

The political opposition daydreamers are dreaming for a two party system, the hope and ambition to take over as the government of the day. Today, we are not talking about the daydreams of the political opposition which we will leave it for another day.

The present ruling government were able to form the federal government with a coalition of 13 political parties that won a simple majority after the 12th general election. The losing of five States and the two third majority in Parliament had shattered the core bone of the coalition which until then was unshakable.

Prior to the 12th general election, everything looks easy for the coalition government, no serious work were needed to ensure their continuing stay in power and what they needed to do were to daydreams of how to enrich themselves and family members while the people were influenced with another type of daydream, that only this coalition is capable of governing this country.

Everyone, one time or another have daydreams. When you get wind that you are going to be promoted to be a manager, you will somehow start to daydream of how you are going to manage your subordinates and the company. How you are going to treat your enemy within, how you aim to go higher up. Your daydream will be effective or not upon sitting inside the manager's room depends greatly on how you play out your daydream.

The PM of a country is no difference, when as DPM and upon learning that he will soon become the next PM, he will has his daydreams but these daydreams are bigger from that of an ordinary manager.

We are quite sure that the present PM of this country had his many daydreams, years before he was even a DPM. His daydreams became more complex as the days get closer for him to become the PM and making it worst was the great lost at the 12th general election.

Why I called it the daydreams of the PM and not planning is because when you make plans, you can really see the whole structure of the ongoings in a transparent manner by a group of people or team work, irrespective whether the plan succeed or fail while the daydreams are only the dreams of the PM alone without full support from others within his team and rushing to implement his daydreams make the situation worst.

The particular outstanding daydream of the PM is to ensure that the coalition continues to hold on to power. Daydreams are often connected with some type of emotion and the emotion of the PM after seeing the lost of the two third majority in Parliament by his predecessor and the fear of losing power in the coming 13th general election is negatively enormous.

One special daydream of the PM is to see a "1Malaysia, People First Performance Now" implementation which by now can be seen by all that it had turned into a disaster. This daydream is good but failed because the PM did not create supportive meaningful daydreams to give it the credence that it needed to succeed. The television stations, TV1, 2, 3, 7, 8 and 9 have been continuously screening the 1Malaysia ideology using the PM's daydream but it is just about that and what we actually see happening on the ground is totally different and the opposite of what they are showing us.

Daydreams are pleasant thoughts, hopes or ambitions that can actually be translated into meaningful actions if the applications are put into the correct perspective without any further disturbances from other newly created daydreams.

The PM, in rushing to put his half-baked daydreams into reality and affirmative actions were met with furious retaliation from all sides because he failed to daydreams about other factors that were required in order to see through his ambition of wanting to hold on to power.

The PM, by playing out his daydreams without first opening them up for discussions and further planning, especially among the various races, had indeed became a big disaster.

Creating daydreams one after another can be disastrous if not handled and play out correctly for it will turned into a horrible nightmare as seen from the latest racial and religious confrontations.

The justification to say the PM is daydreaming for over one and a half years by trying to implement his odds and pieces daydreams is from seeing the continuing failure of the country in every aspect, especially in the economy, judiciary, education, crime, corruptions, suppression of free speech and further racial and religious intolerance.

If one do not know how to turn one's daydreams into good and useful actions, just leave it as a dream.

Read more at Malaysia For All

Voting the Devil you know

We're winning! 1By
Aizuddin Danian


The 13th Malaysian General Election is anywhere between 6-18 months away,depending on who you talk to. Personally, i don't think it'll be so soon. Najib still needs time to sell his 1Malaysia vision, and time to line up all his ducks. The uncertainty surrounding the electorate in Sarawak and Sabah will need to be resolved first too.

So, consider the following as a pre-pre-game match review. Obviously, so many things can and probably will change in the months to come.

Will the 13th GE see another GE2008? Further erosion of BN support among the electorate? Or outright loss of government? Or perhaps the pendulum will swing the other way, and PR will get smashed, lose a few of the states in won in 2008.

Flag of Barisan Nasional.

Image via Wikipedia


What does BN need to do to win?

1. It needs to clarify its position on racial and religious politics. As it stands right now, BN can't seem to get its act together, and is playing a schizophrenic game of "are we (racist) or aren't we". The PM says that PERKASA "isn't too extreme", then, in the next breath declaring "zero tolerance" for racism. The Sec-Gen of UMNO disowning Ibrahim Ali, but not barring his own right hand man from taking on the position as PERKASA Youth chief. There are just too many inconsistencies, and the people are wondering whether BN is trying to have it's cake and eat it too.
I think BN needs to wake up and smell the New Way Elections Are Won (TM). Pandering to the gallery of racial and religious fears may have worked in the past, but its really starting to get old. A positive by-product of the NEP happens to be an increasingly enlightened middle class, able to look beyond the discrimination of race and fear-mongering of religion. As a people, we still identify ourselves according to race and religion, but we've also begun to be able to divorce this identity from a need to discriminate my fellow Malaysian because of it.

I think BN will be pleasantly surprised to see a strong swing of support coming back its way if it permanently said goodbye to using race and religion as a campaign apparatus.

2. BN needs to answer the claims of corruption hanging over it's head. This is a question asked during the GE2008 campaign, and i'll bet the lack of a satisfactory answer was one of the reasons why the voters turned so strongly against BN. Provide the electorate with a "cleaner" alternative, and a "dirty" politician will always struggle to win. Samy Vellu found this out the hard way.

From Mahathir to Badawi, and recently to the current PM, Najib -- the stink of corruption seems overwhelming. But all it not lost. Najib still has a chance to set things right. Openly declare that his family and extended relatives should stay away from any business remotely related to the Government? Empower the anti-corruption agency with powers of prosecution? Najib needs to distance himself from his predecessors, a stringent investigation into the affairs of Tajuddin Ramli and following of the money trail is a good place to start.

The PM has serious problems in being tough on corruption, if the allegations that the dirty money leads to UMNO's coffers, or into the hands of many of its leaders is true. The paradox being that in order to win the elections BN needs to be tough on corruption but by doing so, it might have to eviscerate itself from the inside out. Tough choice for the PM.

3. Put real money into the hands of real people. Despite Government reports that we're set to grow by an improbable 4.5 - 6% in 2010 and on target to hit high-income nation status by 2020, the feeling of wealth is very weak on the ground largely due to rates of inflation in essential goods and the protection of national industries. The price of chicken, sugar and flour seem to increase each time we go to the market. The prices of cars is at a ridiculous proportion to the average income in order to protect non-competitive Proton.

I think what the Government needs to realize is that there are many ways to put money into the hands of the people besides the obvious hand-outs. Not only that but many of these ways will create a lasting good impression, and also have much more long-lasting benefits beyond just the harvest of votes in the 13th GE.

How about removing the toll on selected roads? The Puchong toll road cost the people living in the area RM22.3 million per month. And its not like the roads are any less congested, which is the whole objective of tolled roads in the first place. Take those tolls away, and put real money back into real pockets. One of the things the PR controlled Selangor government did was to provide a small water bill rebate; water became essentially free for many households in the state. The fact that Selangor could do it means that it can be done without breaking the state bank -- putting real money back into real pockets. BN should take notice and ask themselves (1) why they can't to the same and (2) what else they could do to make the ordinary life just that little bit less ordinary.

A new official logo for Pakatan Rakyat

Image via Wikipedia

What can PR do to win?

1. Stop scoring own goals. If there is one single thing that PR needs to do better to ensure a bigger slice of the electorate pie, it's this. Interparty and intraparty wrangling, some of it terribly public has left many voters wondering whether PR can govern itself, let alone govern the nation. The Zaid/Azmin spasm for leadership, the bickering between DAP and PAS over the concept of an Islamic state, the meltdown of the Perak state government, allegations of corruption amongst DAP leaders.

Mainstream media in Malaysia is controlled, in some cases even owned, by the Government. They have a free hand in plastering the Opposition in any which way they please, the last thing PR needs is to provide them with the ammunition to do it.

2. Tell us how you're going to lead. Right now, PR seems like a collection of soundbites and feel good messages. At least, that's what the people think. Ask your average PR supporter what PR stands for and inevitably you'll get answers like, "justice", "fair play", "a better Malaysia", "corruption free" (*cough*DAP*cough*), and "good for our children". But what does this all mean?

PR's Common Policies Framework (CPF) is full of "high level" feel good-ness but very little detail. Here are some selected snippets:

The basis of a high-performance economy is a workforce that is knowledge-based, competent and highly-skilled. Pakatan Rakyat will provide all necessary investment to produce a high-productivity workforce in order to boost high-added value in national economic activities.

Its a nice promise. But the huge amounts of money this will require doesn't appear from thin air. No discussion on how funds will be generated to achieve this.

Enact a Race Relations Act to safeguard unity and harmony of the people and to eliminate discrimination between the races.

A Race Relations Act is a good idea. But it essentially means legislating tolerance. How is that really going to unite the people beyond the artificial confines of law? No discussion on this either.

Emphasise the importance of students mastering various languages including English, Arabic and Mandarin as leading languages in the world and also other mother tongues.

Does this mean replacing Bahasa Malaysia in schools for some subjects? The framework steers clear of making this commitment. Lack of clarity.

The CPF was supposed to bridge the divide between DAP, PAS and PKR, but it leaves many questions unanswered. The fact that the CPF was released in Dec 2009 without a general and public debate about its contents also bodes poorly for PR -- there is a feeling it was rushed and the unity it portrays an enforced one for the sake of convenience only.

Also, PR has resisted calls for a shadow government, the very tool that it could have used to clarify the CPF as how it would apply to real-world scenarios. How would the CPF be applied to the case of Namewee? To the alleged racism of the headmistress in Kulai? Or rising prices of essential goods and services? Or to the current issue of teenage pregnancy and baby abandonment? Real issues a real government will need to resolve. There has been little opportunity to see the CPF in action.

There is already a strong feeling that PR is a marriage of convenience; an unhappy marriage is unfit to rule a nation. More needs to be done to dispel this perception. Demonstrating an ability to agree on the details of policy will go a long way to doing that.

Who will win?

As of right now, this very instant, my gut tells me that the 13th General Election is PR's to lose rather than BN's to win. Once the campaign machinations start to turn in earnest, i can see the average Malaysian being convinced to believe that life can be better than what we have. The need to believe is probably enough to get many to switch allegiances, for those who voted BN in the past.

The keys to victory, besides the items i've discussed above, will be how each side sways the swing vote, the "silent majority", the voice yet unheard; Malaysia has nearly 5 million unregistered voters mostly from between the ages of 21-35 years. That's a goldmine demographic. Assuming that a good number of this demographic can be convinced to shake off their political apathy, i forsee a period of political change on the horizon.

Mahathir created Malaysian monsters greedy for money and power

from Malaysian Indian One

Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysians remember you as a dictator. Hundreds of people were detained under ISA during your rule. So don't talk about democracy. I was a victim of your dictatorship.

Dr Mahathir, you killed democracy in Malaysia - that is your legacy. We don't need people like you anymore in this blessed country. You are a Malay nationalist, that's all. You didn't serve all of Malaysia's people, which include the Chinese, Indians, and other ethnic groups.

A statesman is one who has served his country's people well and promoted democratic values and principles within government institutions and society as whole. You silenced voices of dissent in no uncertain terms. And in the end, the monsters you've created devoured you in the process.

Yes, you created monsters greedy for money and power, and who were willing to use any means necessary to acquire them. This country has failed to serve all its people and continues to do so. You began the trend of money politics and this is the result of your actions.

Just watch the news daily and you can see how lop-sided the coverage is in favour of the ruling party, and this right in front of our very own eyes. If only all Malaysians would open their eyes and ears to see and listen, they would know what to do come the 13th general election.

It has been estimated that during Mahathir's premiership, the amount of taxpayers' money allegedly misused by him and his cronies was in the region of hundreds of billions. To carry out this, he completely destroyed the judiciary and the enforcement agencies by replacing the honest top officials in these agencies with tainted officials who could be blackmailed into doing his bidding.

By having these people under his thumb and by controlling the media and the civil service, he ensured that he literally had dictatorial powers. To make sure that all the crooked deals that he made were not known to the public, he enacted laws like the Official Secrets Act.

In short, he was a premier who manipulated the democratic system to give himself dictatorial powers. That is why it is extremely disgusting to hear this man pontificating on democracy or corruption.

It is sad but not surprising that Dr Mahathir continues to peddle half-truths to justify his opinions. He reduces democracy to a one-dimensional event - elections - and fails to refer to other equally important elements that constitute the package called democracy.

He speaks of "sore losers", but what about the 'tyranny of the majority' (which he should be all too familiar with)? A system cultivated and nourished through dubious means and made legal through a two-thirds majority and then used to subvert national institutions to do the bidding of the majority - sore losers are nothing compared to this tyranny.

Asian values were promoted as an ideology to restrict mass political participation, good governance, transparency and accountability.

Mahathir is a hypocrite. When Umno was declared illegal and Mahathir's position as its leader and prime minister was sorely threatened, he sacked the then Lord President and the five Supreme Court (now called the Federal Court) judges when he knew the verdict was not going to be in his favour.

Dr Mahathir, you destroyed the very fabric of Malaysia's public institutions, its constitution, the judiciary, the enforcement agencies like the police, attorney-general, and the then ACA

This has been highlighted by Ku Li (Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah) in his speeches. Please do the honourable thing and retire, and just keep quiet like your anointed successor, Pak Lah (Abdullah Ahmad Badawi), the Father of Malaysia's Conscience.

Rina Akiyama





Rina Akiyama (born 26 September 1985) is a Japanese actress, gravure idol, and tarento from Tokyo. Her most notable appearances are in two Kamen Rider Series, namely Kamen Rider Agito and Kamen Rider Den-O. She also has a cameo appearance in Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater in which she is featured in a poster on one of the levels. She has also been named to have the "Best Buttocks in Japan" in 2007, which earned her the nickname "Oshirina", a portmanteau of the words "oshiri" (buttocks) and "Rina".

Lihan’s joke ” Baram dam a gift from God for the Orang Ulu “


Telang Usan assemblyman reiterated that the Baram hydroelectric dam project is a gift from God for the minority Orang Ulu.

“I am not ashamed to say that the mega project is a gift from God because as a result of the project the government will build a 60-km road from Long Lama to the dam site at Long Keseh, benefitting about 12,000 Kayans from nine longhouses along the river,” he said.

He said he had proposed to have a road to link all the longhouses along Baram River before the dam was even conceptualised, more as a wish for a better life for the people.

The road came into the picture when the government proposed the Baram dam, he added.

“What I am saying is that if there is no Baram dam, there won’t be any road being built. It does not make any economic sense just building a road like that. The proposed dam justifies the building of the RM500-million road,” explained Lihan.

Urging his critics to look at the bigger picture, he said the stretch of road from Long Lama made up Package B of the overall road project under Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy. He said the package cost the government a massive RM500 million.

Package A is the stretch of road from Beluru to Sungai Tinjar encompassing Lapok road.

The upgrading of 35.73-km Lapok road at a cost of about RM101 million commenced three days ago and is expected to be completed in three years, Lihan revealed.

“Our people who are already poor have had to buy 4WD vehicles to travel through this road, having to bear high maintenance cost due to wear and tear their vehicles were subject to. But this will be behind us three years from now,” said Lihan.

Lihan said tender for Package B of the SCORE project would close on Sept 24 and both packages would start this year.

The assemblyman urged Baram folk not to politicise the Baram dam project.

“I urge for understanding and acceptance of this mega project. The expected life-span of a dam is around 500 years. The dam will generate cheap energy for the community. Let us play a part in nation-building by accepting this project.

“Of course there are certain groups instigating the people to reject this project. In life, one has to accept challenges. If the Orang Ulu reject this project, there won’t be an opportunity like this for a very, very long time, maybe not during our lifetime on earth,” said Lihan. – The Borneo post

PKR Deputy Presidential Race: Let Good Sense Prevail


www.sun2surf.com.my

Zaid can play advisory role in PKR

by David Yeoh

…much of public discourse has departed sharply from reality. Self-evident common sense appears to have been turned on its head. Reality seems to have been recast, with fantasies recalibrated as facts while demonstrate truths are dismissed as a matter of opinion at best…This isn’t just a question of disagreement over issues or polices. Those who dissent are vilified as beyond the pale, and many fear speaking up. The phenomenon has affected not just the political sphere, where ideology often crowds out facts, for even parts of the scientific domain have given in to irrationality…no debate is possible because there is to be no dissent from positions that are indisputably true and right.”Melanie Phillips,The World Turned Upside Down


Comment: WHETHER we like it or not, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) is becoming a major political force to be reckoned with, so important developments on or changes in its leadership are of public interest and concern. This is the time for closing of the ranks.

Datuk Zaid Ibrahim’s recent announcement of his decision to vie for the post of deputy president of PKR is untimely. Furthermore it appears to be causing much dissent and divisions in the party than originally anticipated. It is forcing many PKR leaders and members to make a difficult choice at a time when it needs to be truly united in facing the coming challenges.

Zaid has his strengths no doubt but he has only joined the party for hardly a year. It is not a question of his right to offer himself, and of course, every member who qualifies also has such a right. It is also not about proving that PKR is a democratic party. To earn respect, trust and recognition from members, he needs much more time to serve the party. That said, he can make major contributions in terms of his strategic skills and wide network.

Zaid should consider going for one of the vice-presidency posts. Or he can even plan a useful advisory or even behind-the-scene role to train and guide younger members on the PKR ideology and struggle. Therefore, there is no need for him to challenge Azmin Ali for the deputy presidency.

Azmin has been with the party since its inception in 1999 and he has proven his loyalty, commitment, capability and leadership. He is also a dynamic grassroots leader. As a younger and more dynamic leader, he can play a more effective role in complementing Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail as president and Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as the de facto leader. He enjoys the confidence of the leadership and is well-groomed to lead PKR, given his broad experience in politics and administration. It should be remembered that Azmin is the PR whip in Parliament where he has played a very effective role.

Kuala Lumpur

It's just a lovers' spat: Anwar on Perkasa-UMNO


Harakahdaily

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 13: Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim has described the much publicised spat between UMNO and its right-wing offshoot Perkasa as an "act" which forms part of UMNO's preparation for the 13th general election.

“It was UMNO leaders who had been intensely promoting Perkasa,” remarked Anwar as quoted by news portal TV Selangor.

Saying Perkasa’s registration was quickly approved, Anwar reminded that events organised by the group were patronised by not only former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, but also prime minister Najib Razak himself.

“When (UMNO) is pressured, they (Perkasa) calls for divorce. This is another trick,” he quipped.

The UMNO secretary general Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor had recently made remarks distancing th party from Perkasa, whose racially-toned statements have been condemned by Malaysians of all political affiliations.

Perkasa chief Ibrahim Ali in response charged that Tengku Adnan did not get the blessing of the UMNO supreme council in making the statement.

One of Perkasa's strongest supporters, Dr Mahathir, jumped in the fray by backing Ibrahim, saying Perkasa's existence was in the interest of the Malay-based party.

For his part, Najib, speaking to CNBC Asia, said Perkasa was not against 1Malaysia and the New Economic Model (NEM), only that it differed in its approaches.

“They (Perkasa and Dr Mahathir) are talking more about bumiputera rights. But actually we are not taking anything away from the bumiputera, but we are saying that let us do it differently. Let us get better results. Let us achieve a more equitable society. But at the same time, being fair to the non-bumiputeras as well. Because we want to build a 1Malaysia,” Najib was quoted.

The statement however failed to convince Anwar, who likened the tit-for-tat statements to a "silat" (martial art), and a move to 'stage a divorce' with Perkasa.

“UMNO cannot let go of its responsibility as a body who keeps on promoting Perkasa, and if they are adamant, they need to give an explanation to the people about what really is going on,” said the Permatang Pauh member of parliament.

Anwar added that UMNO should declare that its severance of ties with Perkasa was final "or just for political expediency".

“To date, we are not convinced that UMNO does not really relate to Perkasa's views,” he told reporters during a Hari Raya gathering organised by PKR in Seberang Jaya.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...