Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Social Political Buzz & Bulls

Time to Relax after a heavy week

Mongkut Bean, Tok Cik, Tean Rean, Menyalak-er, and my wonderful blogging friends,

Believe me, we all have had a rough week that ended with Tun Ling Liong Sik being charged for misleading Mahathir and his Cabinet (2002) on the land deal for Port Kelang Free Zone(PKFZ).

Deja Vu! PKFZ is back in the news, proving that Anwar Ibrahims revelation of this dark deal (in 2007) is fact, not fiction. I am in a celebratory mood at the prospect of finally seeing the entire 2002 Cabinet led by the then top honcho in court to be grilled by Liong Siks lawyers.

I am also in a romantic mood as well. The oldies I have chosen reflect the way I feel right now. Dr. Kamsiah did not participate in selecting this weeks repertoire of great melodies of a bygone era. Why? Because I have chosen the tunes for her with lots of love, and for the women (Kakrubi, Maureen, Kathy and others) who have contributed a lot to liven and enlighten this blog. Have a good weekend Din Merican

Bing CrosbyThats What Life Is All About

Paul Anka and Samy Davies JrI Am Not Anyone

Perry ComoAnd I Love You So

Matt MonroeBorn Free

Andy WilliamsLove Story

Jerry Vale I Have But One Heart

Venice in the Summer Time

Dean MartinOn An Evening In Roma


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

Anwar, Farah and Saiful

  • A friend asks me why I did not write anything about RPK revelation on the affair between the infamous scholarship applicant, Saiful Bukhari and the DPP Farah Azlina Latiff. It seems that both of them are actually engaged to their respective partners. It is hard for to answer but suffice to say that I dont have to express my opinion about everything that appears on the alternative media that is related to Anwar. Sometimes not saying anything is probably the best thing to do. Even though RPK says that .. is having an affair but I prefer to treat it is an unsubstantiated allegation.


  • Despite my initial reluctance to write anything about it initially, I find the way the news has spread and been analysed has become so chronically negative (spin 1, spin 2, spin 3, spin 4, spin 5 )to the extent that ever the BAR council is deliberating about the matter. Over the last few days from so called affair which was made public and spin by RPK, the news is now being spined that they had illicit sex. Now it has gone to the level where people question why the religious authorities are not acting on the matter. I have yet to see a single piece of evidence being put anywhere on the net that they had sex or was actually romantically involved. In fact I am sceptical that they had an affair beyond the normalcy of friendship.

  • Someone pointed out that the fact that the AG has dropped her from the prosecution team proved to a certain extent that there must be some substance over the allegations raised by RPK. I am actually at loss on what to say and can only shake my head when people make such conclusions based on this type of actions. Beyond reasonable doubt Gani Patail is not a saint and he is also the most political AG in the recent! Malaysi an history. However it does not mean that just because he removed Farah, we can assume that there is an affair and the affair is now sexual! We all know that in current situation, the most likely probability is that she was removed because the AG doesnt want the opposition to have the bullet to attack the AG. Under the circumstances, if I am the AG, I would have also done the same thing i.e. dropping Farah from the team.

  • No one has ever asked how Janna Syariza (Saifuls fianc) and Farah fianc reactions over the matter. They had feelings too and to a certain extent this spin on the internet whether true of false must hurt their feelings. It would have embarrassed them and their families. Personally I feel this spin must stop. If there are no hard facts, people should not write anything about it. Anyone can make an allegation. Though without doubt, I must say that that RPK allegation on many issues has substance and in this case I believe he had some info as well. However, private matter between two individuals is not a material for RPK or any blogger to comment especially when we dont have all the information.

  • Let us have some sanity over this matter. If indeed there is such an affair and it broke any laws then let the lawyers defending Anwar handles it in court. If the court made a dissenting view, then we can have an opinion on the basis of the judgement. It would not be a fair thing to do to have an opinion on something that is not substantiated by facts. In my mind, clearly RPK or anyone else has not presented any shred of evidence thus far. Even if there is evidence, it is a private matter between two adults, their families and Allah.


  • See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Not Sentimental About Ling Liong Sik

    July 30, 2010

    Not Sentimental About Ling Liong Sik

    by SakmongkolAK47

    I am not at all sentimental about Ling Liong Sik being charged in court. By sentimental here, I take it to mean, regretting or feeling sad that he is being charged.

    In my previous article I merely asked how can it be possible that Ling Liong Sik was able to prepare cabinet papers for discussion. Or that his version of the price of land to be purchased was accepted without debate. In open court, cabinet notes and minutes will have to be submitted. Many people will salivate at the prospects.

    It is impossible to infer that in previous meetings the subject of any land purchases by PKA and KDSB were not raised. Its not like buying kacang puteh (peanuts).

    I am precisely not being sentimental by raising the issue. Because then, that would make the whole cabinet which presided on that day, culpable. Lings lawyer must put every cabinet member deciding on that day, on the stand. And when that happens, if some people who are held in iconic esteem by some are placed in the dock, we dont want any outpouring of protests- dont, because you will be accused of being sentimental.

    If that is the case, then we expect many would be charged. If I am being sentimental, I will say, come on, let Ling go because he is a former senior minister, because he was MCAs boss and because he is now a Tun. Also because he was actually PM for a few hours. That would be sentimental.

    But to raise questions that would probably lead to others being in the same boat like Ling Liong Sik hardly qualifies being sentimental. Sometimes these young cikus need to be educated. You come back from Amerika, you think you are very clever!

    I am willing to say, by allowing a very high profile individual be charged, Dato Seri Najib is showing a strong hand i! n this. He is signaling that he is fully committed to transparency and low tolerance of corrupt practices and abuse of power. People will say that all this is sandiwara (theatrical performance).

    Who cares, because the most important thing, someone is now charged. The public wants this and this will help his credibility. If this is a start, PKR people need not shout here and there asking the government to rope in more people. That will come. What if other Tuns were to be treated in the same manner? Then I hope if there is public outcry, dont say they are being sentimental.

    Beyond that, we can expect other high profile people will be charged with a host of cases. Maybe now its time to restore indictment for the 18 high profile cases which Minister Rais Yatim once said. We need to tell Rais he shouldnt hold back. Pressure the government to charge all the people in the 18 high profile cases. It is now also opportune for newly appointed senator Ezam Mohd Noor to reveal the contents of his Pandoras boxes containing indisputable information on corruption. When YB Ezam?

    This is a right step. Charge first and let the accused have their day in court. Who knows we may learn many things if Ling Liong Sik intends to make amends. Provided of course, we are not told before hand by the AG that only ONE person is responsible for the PKFZ thing. Lets not pre-determine the number of accused in this case.


    Letter & Opinion From Joe Public

    Mahathir and his 2002 Cabinet Crew: Collective Responsibility for PKFZ

    July 30, 2003

    Dr Mahathir and his 2002 Cabinet Crew should testify in Court: It is about Collective Responsibility

    DAPs veteran leader Lim Kit Siang asked if former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad or any of his ministers from the 2002 Cabinet would testify in court when it hears the case against former Transport Minister and MCA President Dr Ling Liong Sik?

    Ling was accused of misleading the government into approving Port Klang Authoritys purchase of the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) land with 15-year repayment with compound interest instead of 10 years.

    Who were the ministers in the 2002 Cabinet. The deputy prime minister was Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Other ministers who are still ministers include Najib Tun Razak, Muhyiddin Yassin, Hishammuddin Hussein, Nazri Abdul Aziz, Rais Yatim and Bernard Dompok.

    Other ministers then who are no longer in the cabinet include Rafidah Aziz, Azmi Khalid; three MCA ministers at the time, Chua Jui Meng, Fong Chan Onn, Ong Ka Ting, Lim Keng Yaik, S. Samy Vellu and Law Hieng Ding, said Lim in a statement.

    Still waiting for AG to act

    The Ipoh Timor MP noted that as far back as three years ago in Parliament, during the budget debate in September 2007, he had focused on the main issues of the PKFZ scandal:

    1. PKAs purchase of 1,000 acres of Pulau Indah land from Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd for PKFZ at RM25 psf when the Treasury and Attorney-Generals Chambers proposed acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act at RM10 psf.

    2. The ballooning of the PKFZ cost from RM1.1 billion to RM4.6 billion and its development costs from RM400 million to RM2.8 billion.

    3. The four illegal letters of support by then transport ministers Ling and (form! er MCA d eputy president) Chan Kong Choy for the RM4.6 billion bonds issued by KDSB through special purpose vehicles.

    These issues have not been adequately dealt with despite the promise by Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail last December and the country is still waiting for him to fulfill his pledge to leave no stone unturned to haul in the big fish implicated in the PKFZ scandal, said Lim.

    Yesterday, Ling was charged at the Sessions Court under Sections 417 and 418 of the Penal Code for cheating and could face a jail term if found guilty.

    The 67-year-old medical doctor-turned-politician, who was bestowed with a Tun the highest honorific title in the country after his retirement in 2003, had pleaded not guilty.

    The case, dubbed as the most high-profile corruption case in Malaysian history, would be mentioned in September. Ling, a long-time minister and MCAs sixth president, was known to be close to Mahathir during his tenure in government.

    The charge against Ling reads:

    That you, between Sept 25 and Nov 6, 2002, at Level 4 of the Prime Ministers Office in Bangunan Perdana Putra, cheated the Government by deceiving the Cabinet into approving a land purchase in Pulau Indah for a Mega Distribution Hub project in Port Klang according to the terms agreed between Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd and Port Klang Authority which, among others, are:

    1. The size of the land being 999.5 acres or 43,538,200 sq ft

    2. The purchase price for the land being RM25 per sq ft amounting to a total of RM1,088,456,000

    3. The repayment period being based on a deferred payment of 15 years with an interest rate of 7.5% per annum (total RM720,014,600), and thereby dishonestly hiding the fact that the valuation by the Valuation and Property Service Department on the land was RM25 per sq ft for a repayment period of 10 years or RM25.82 per sq ft for a repayment period of 15 years, including coupon/interest that could be charge! d for th e repayment period.

    And as such, you purposely induced the Cabinet to give its consent to the purchase, whereas the Cabinet would not have given its consent if the fact had been told to the Cabinet, and the fraud was committed with the knowledge that you could cause a loss to the Government, where you have an interest in the transaction pertaining to the fraud and you are bound under the law to protect it and, as such, you have committed an offence punishable under Section 418 of the Penal Code.


    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    The Economist Intelligence Report on Malaysia August 2010


    There has been speculation in the past month that a general election will be called by early 2011. This would be considerably before its due date, which falls in March 2013. If an early election is called, it may be because the BN wants to make the most of a possible conviction against Anwar Ibrahim, the leader of the opposition Pakatan Rakyat alliance, who is in court fighting sodomy charges.

    THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

    Economist Intelligence Unit, London

    Country Report - Main report: August 1st 2010

    Highlights

    Outlook for 2010-11

    The Economist Intelligence Unit expects the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition to remain in power in 2010-11. The BN still has a sufficiently large parliamentary majority to pass the bulk of new legislation unchallenged. Speculation has grown about the likelihood that the government will call a snap election, but we do not believe that the prime minister, Najib Razak, is preparing to go the polls before 2012.

    Policy will be tightened in 2010-11 following a recent period of fiscal stimulus and loose monetary policy. The government aims to cut its fiscal deficit through an efficiency drive and a reduction in the subsidy bill.
    The economy is expected to stage a strong recovery in 2010, growing by 6.8%. However, as this relatively rapid acceleration mostly reflects the rebound from the contraction in 2009, the annual average rate of growth will slow in 2011.

    Price pressures will remain subdued in 2010, when we expect consumer price inflation to average 1.7%. Inflation will then accelerate to 2.6% in 2011, owing in part to continued growth in domestic demand. Despite the relatively fast pace of growth of imports compared with that of exports, Malaysia will continue to post substantial trade and current-account surpluses in 2010-11.
    Monthly review

    There has been speculation in the past month that a general election will be called by early 2011. This would be considerably before its due date, which falls in March 2013. If an early election is called, it may be because the BN wants to make the most of a possible conviction against Anwar Ibrahim, the leader of the opposition Pakatan Rakyat alliance, who is in court fighting sodomy charges.

    Relations between Malaysia and Singapore are improving, with the two sides co-operating on land ownership and tourism deals.

    On July 8th Bank Negara Malaysia (the central bank) took another step towards returning its main policy rate, the overnight policy rate, to a more neutral level. BNM raised the rate by 25 basis points to 2.75%.

    In a surprise move on July 15th the government has reduced the size of the subsidies for five important items. It raised the regulated prices of petrol (RON95 grade) by 2.8%, diesel by 2.9%, cooking gas by 5.7% and sugar by 15.2%.

    Data on industrial production and external trade for May showed a continuation of the recent strong growth, but a degree of caution is becoming evident, as reflected by changes in a business conditions index.
    Outlook for 2010-11: Domestic politics

    In 2010-11 fierce political tussles will continue between the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition and the main opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR, Peoples Alliance) as both groups strive to increase their representation in national and state parliaments. At present the BN governs with a simple parliamentary majority, which allows it to pass the bulk of legislation unchallenged. However, a two-thirds majority is needed to amend the constitution. The prime minister, Najib Razak, will continue to pursue a strategy aimed at restoring public confidence in the BN and winning back the seats in state assemblies and the national parliament that the coalition lost at the general election in March 2008. To date, there have been 11 state a! nd parli amentary by-elections since the 2008 general election. The scorecard is eight wins to the PR and three to the BN. Despite these results, Mr Najib's approval ratings have been climbing steadily, from 44% in April 2009 to 72% in May 2010.

    In the light of this higher approval rating and recent signs of a strong recovery in the economy, speculation has grown about the likelihood that the government will call a snap election. (The next general election is not due until early 2013.) Although a recent increase in parliamentary allocations for BN members of parliament (MPs) for help with their constituency expenses and a renewed focus on registering new voters has contributed to this speculation, the Economist Intelligence Unit does not believe that Mr Najib is preparing to go the polls before 2012. Although a strong election performance would bolster his mandate, the results of recent by-elections suggest that the electorate has become much more volatile, especially non-Malay voters, and there is no guarantee that the government's plans to reform policies that favour bumiputera (ethnic Malays and other indigenous peoples, who make up around 60% of the population) has increased its appeal among ethnic minorities.

    Mr Najib continues to enjoy general support among ethnic Malays, but he does face opposition from conservative groups to his plans to reduce special rights for Malays. He appears to be hoping that he still has sufficient latitude to make further changes to these policies, while also securing a greater understanding for the necessity for other unpopular policy decisions, such as pushing through a goods and services tax (GST). The prime minister is also aware that the promotion of racial harmony is vital to his plans to woo voters from the countrys ethnic minorities, many of whom abandoned the BN in favour of the multiracial opposition at the last election. Mr Najib attempted to encapsulate his political ambitions by coining a new slogan1Malaysia: People first, Performance nowat the star! t of his premiership.

    Mr Najib may be looking for the opposition to fall further into disarray before going to the polls. The opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim, is facing the possibility of a 20-year prison term if found guilty of sodomy, a charge for which he is currently on trial. Mr Anwar continues to claim that the case against him is politically motivated and has been fabricated to remove him from the political scene. A guilty verdict and a custodial sentence for Mr Anwar could destabilise the PR, as he is widely believed to be the glue that holds the alliance together. The PR received a confidence boost from its electoral success in May 2010 when it won the Sibu parliamentary seat, but morale among members of the one of the parties in the PR, the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) led by Mr Anwar, remains low, undermined by the recent decision by a handful of its MPs to leave the PKR and stand as independents.
    Outlook for 2010-11: International relations

    Mr Najib is expected to strengthen economic ties with Singapore and China, Malaysias largest trade partners in Asia. To this end, he will continue to promote to Singaporean investors the Iskandar project, a 2,217 sq-km develop-ment zone in the state of Johor, which borders Singapore. In addition, state tourism agencies of both countries have recently launched a feasibility study to look into ways to replicate the success of Singapore's Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve in Kranji at similar sites in Johor. Through its membership of the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN), Malaysias economic ties with China, Australia, New Zealand and India have been strengthened by the signing of free-trade agreements, all of which came into full effect in January.
    Outlook for 2010-11: Policy trends

    During the next decade the policy agenda will be guided by a host of initiatives aimed at raising per-head income and meeting the goal of becoming a high-income nation by 2020. Improvements will be made to six national key result areas, outlined! in a Go vernment Transformation Programme, which includes raising the quality of human capital and improving basic rural infrastructure. The Tenth Malaysia Plan (10MP), a medium-term spending plan covering 201115, will promote 12 national key economic areas, such as tourism, palm oil and private healthcare, which are thought to have the greatest potential to boost overall economic growth. In the forecast period the government will also be implementing eight strategic reform initiatives, which have been outlined in an Economic Transformation Programme. One of the initiatives is the phasing out of price controls and subsidies, which has been deemed necessary to create a competitive domestic economy. Another is to reform bumiputera affirmative-action policies. The government has already relaxed a requirement obliging firms to offer a minority equity stake to bumiputera. It hopes that further reforms will attract greater inflows of foreign direct investment, which will be one of the main drivers of growth in the next five years. However, the government is unlikely to dismantle affirmative action altogether for fear of losing its Malay support base.
    Outlook for 2010-11: Fiscal policy

    The government appears determined to address the countrys poor fiscal position, having run up a budget deficit equivalent to 7% of GDP in 2009 owing in part to its economic stimulus measures. The government will have broad success in its aim to cut the deficit to 5.3% this year through an efficiency drive and a reduction in the subsidy bill. The Economist Intelligence Unit expects the government to have further success in reining in the budget deficit in 2011, but there will not be a marked narrowing. Plans to widen the tax base have encountered strong resistance from businesses as well as consumers. The government has already announced changes to a new property tax, which will reduce the amount collected from this particular source. However, it remains non-committal on the implementation of the GST, a crucial part of tax re! form. Th e proposed GST will make the government less dependent on payments by the national oil company, Petronas, which currently supplies over 40% of the government's revenue. According to the second finance minister, Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah, in early July 2010 the government still had not set a definite timeframe for the implementation of the new tax. Under its original plan, the government had sought to introduce the tax in the third quarter of 2011.
    Outlook for 2010-11: Monetary policy

    Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM, the central bank) is expected to tighten monetary policy further in the forecast period. It has already raised the overnight policy rate (OPR) three times since March 2010, by a total of 75 basis points, pushing the OPR up to 2.75%. It is expected to make incremental changes to the OPR in a process that it regards as a normalisation of this interest rate, after it was cut to a record low in response to a dramatic downturn in the Malaysian economy in 2009. However, BMN does not foresee inflation rising to problematic levels, believing that it will remain moderate going into 2011, with the forecast of a strengthening in domestic demand being accompanied by only a gradual acceleration in inflation. As such we do not see the OPR rising above the high of 3.5% that was in place during 2007 and much of 2008.


    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Gaji CEO SYABAS Lebih Tinggi Dari CEO Bank of China

    CEO SYABAS dilaporkan mendapat gaji berjumlah RM5.1 juta setahun. Dari artikel di bawah, di dapati bahawa gaji CEO 3 bank terbesar di Dunia adalah sekitar USD230,000 (bersamaan RM954k)sahaja.

    Reuters melaporkan:
    China, for example, boasts three of the world's four biggest banks, yet the leaders of those banks -- Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank Corp and Bank of China -- are among the lowest paid of those surveyed by Reuters. The chairman and the president of each of the banks are paid roughly $230,000 per yearBank ICBC, bank terbesar di dunia, membayar CEO mereka USD234,700 pada tahun 2008. Jumlah ini bersamaan RM1 juta setahun.

    Gaji CEO SYABAS, Razali Ismail, dilaporkan berjumlah RM5.1 juta setahun. Razali sendiri mengaku gaji dia RM5.1 juta setahun. Pengakuan Rozali boleh dibaca di sini.

    Di sini kita lihat bagaimana UMNO membla kroni dan budak2 suruhan mereka. Apa hebatnya Razali Ismail untuk dibayar RM5.1 juta setahun. Kalau tidak kerana kerajaan Selangor diambil alih oleh PR, nescaya bil air kita akan naik berkali2 ganda kerana membela orang seperti Razali Ismail.

    Jangan kita lupa SYABAS telah menaikkan banner dan memberi wang kepada PAS Selangor sewaktu menganjurkan Muktamar PAS di Shah Alam dua tahun lepas.

    Saya hairan. Kalau dibandingkan SYABAS dengan Bank of CHina ataupun ICBC macam dibandingkan semut dengan gajah. Tapi gaji CEO SYABAS adalah lima kali ganda gaji CEO ICBC atau Bank of China.

    Patutlah Malaysia nak bangkrap. Adanya manusia2 seperti Razali Ismail yang mendapat gaji tidak selaras dengan kebolehan dan kelayakan beliau. Gaji dibayar semata-mata kerana dia adlah kroni UMNO.

    Lepas tu, ada hati nak saman kerajaan negeri Selangor. Agaknya, dah nampak gaji RM5 juta ni tak boleh tahan lama sebab kerajaan negeri takkan sokong dia lagi. Dasar orang UMNO suka rompak rakyat untuk mengkayakan diri sendiri.

    Tulang Besi
    Study shows U.S. bank CEO pay dwarfs rest of world

    Industrial & ! Commerci al Bank of China Ltd (ICBC) Chairman Jiang Jianqing attends a news conference announcing the 2007 annual results in Hong Kong March 25, 2008. REUTERS/Bobby Yip

    Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd (ICBC) Chairman Jiang Jianqing attends a news conference announcing the 2007 annual results in Hong Kong March 25, 2008.


    By Steve Eder

    NEW YORK | Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:43am EDT

    NEW YORK (Reuters) - You wouldn't know it by his pay stubs, but Jiang Jianqing heads the world's largest bank.

    Jiang, chairman of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, made just $234,700 in 2008. That's less than 2 percent of the $19.6 million awarded to Jamie Dimon, chief executive of the world's fourth-largest bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    The contrast illustrates the massive differences in pay among the CEOs of the world's top banks. The compensation of the CEOs of the largest U.S. banks towers above what's paid to banking chiefs in other parts of the world, according to a Reuters analysis of pay at the 18 biggest banks by market value.

    Excessive compensation at banks is expected to be discussed this week when the Group of 20 nations meets in Pittsburgh. But consensus on the issue remains a distant hope as there continue to be vast differences in how bankers are paid, from the CEO on down.

    The United States is home to four of the nine largest banks in the world -- JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co and Citigroup Inc. It is also home to four of the six most handsomely rewarded bank CEOs.

    "The U.S. executive pay levels have always dwarfed pay for companies elsewhere in the world," said Sarah Anderson, a fellow with the Institute for Policy Studies, which is critical of Wall Street, and co-author of the recent study "America's Bailout Barons."

    "They have claimed it is impossible to recruit people without paying such compensation. Yet, if you look at the pay levels in Europe and in a lot of Asian countries, somehow they manage! to find people who can run major global firms while making a fraction of what they make in the U.S.," she said.

    For a graphic comparing bank chiefs' pay around the world, click here

    "BASICALLY NOTHING"

    China, for example, boasts three of the world's four biggest banks, yet the leaders of those banks -- Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank Corp and Bank of China -- are among the lowest paid of those surveyed by Reuters. The chairman and the president of each of the banks are paid roughly $230,000 per year.

    "That's basically nothing for the leaders of these huge Chinese financial institutions," said Laura Thatcher, who leads law firm Alston & Bird's executive compensation practice in Atlanta. "I can't imagine why they would work for nothing."

    So how, exactly, do the Chinese do it?

    The Chinese banks, which are state-controlled, are typically led by bureaucrats appointed by the central government, and executive pay is capped.

    Being the head of a Chinese bank does come with perks, just like running a U.S. bank. The top Chinese bank executive gets such non-cash benefits as a car, driver, medical insurance, food and housing. Experts note that many American and European executives receive similar benefits.

    Some of the Chinese bank executives may be willing to accept the pay level of a top government official in the hope of moving into a powerful political position in the future.

    But the executives also feel the consequences of a global downturn, just like some of the U.S. CEOs who were forced to skip bonuses or accept reduced salaries in the past two years.

    ICBC's Jiang took a 10 percent pay cut in 2008, even as ICBC's profit jumped 36 percent to $16.23 billion.

    LOST IN TRANSLATION?

    Aside from China, all of the banking CEOs included in the survey made at least $1 million last year. Total compensation included publicly disclosed bonuses, stock awards, options and other perks! .

    HSBC Holdings, the world's third-largest bank by market capitalization, paid CEO Michael Geoghegan $2.8 million in 2008 -- much more than his Chinese counterparts but far less than JPMorgan paid Dimon.

    Outside the United States, the highest-paid bank CEO works for Banco Santander SA, which has the seventh-largest market cap and paid Alfredo Saenz $13.66 million for 2008.

    Royal Bank of Canada paid Gordon Nixon $9.5 million, while Australian CEOs Ralph Norris of Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Gail Kelly of Westpac Banking Corp made $8 million and $7.4 million, respectively.

    Japan's biggest bank, Mitsubishi UFJ, did not release the pay details of its CEO.

    Alan Johnson, a Wall Street compensation consultant with Johnson Associates, said much is lost in translation when comparing CEO pay from country to country.

    And that will make it difficult for world leaders to find consensus at the G20 summit.

    "Different cultures, different disclosures," Johnson said. "It just highlights the difficulty across the world in trying to make far-reaching pay decisions."

    To Anderson, though, comparing bank CEO pay around the world makes the issue much more clear-cut.

    "These kinds of figures undercut the main argument by the U.S. financial industry lobby that they will lose top talent to competitors in Europe or Asia," Anderson said.

    (Reporting by Steve Eder; Additional reporting by George Chen in Hong Kong, Samuel Shen in Shanghai, Michael Wei in Beijing, Ian Simpson in Milan, Judy MacInnes in Madrid, Lisa Jucca in Zurich, Morag MacKinnon in Sydney, Andrea Hopkins in Toronto, Sudip Kar-Gupta in Paris, Steve Slater in London, Nathan Layne in Tokyo, and Michael Flaherty in Hong Kong; editing by John Wallace)


    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Straight Talking Benigno Aquino III has ruffed some diplomatic feathers

    July 30, 2010

    Straight Talking Benigno Aquino III has ruffed some diplomatic feathers

    by John Teo

    NEW Philippine President Benigno Aquino III seems to have developed a reputation, after just weeks into his presidency, for straight talking. While that may be a welcome change to Filipinos tired of all the doubletalk and double dealing that pass for politics in the country, it may not go down too well in the arena of international diplomacy.

    Already, Aquino has ruffled some diplomatic feathers by failing to acknowledge that Japan is in fact his countrys top aid donor.

    Malaysia seems to be also at the receiving end of the Philippine presidents rather impolitic talking style. Asked if Indonesia would be roped in to assist in mediating the stalled talks between the Philippine government and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) rebels, Aquino was tellingly non-committal.

    In answer to a press question, Aquino said Indonesia, like Malaysia, would be considered for the role and he had to request either country if it would consider to take it on. His seemingly innocuous answer perhaps inadvertently betrayed partiality towards a strain in Philippine official thinking that has always viewed Malaysias role as mediator in the talks as problematic, often citing unresolved claims over Sabah as somehow compromising Malaysias neutrality.

    That sort of answer also hardly appears to be a ringing endorsement of what Malaysia has so far done in mediating the conflict. We have brought both sides to the conflict not just to the table in tortuous negotiating sessions but facilitated their reaching a final draft agreement.

    That draft agreement on ancestral domain was a breakthrough in incorporating provisions for substantive and real political autonomy for Muslims in Mindanao within the Philippine stat! e, in c ontrast to the largely paper autonomy that the Philippine government conceded to the Moro National Liberation Front in an earlier agreement forged under Indonesian auspices, an agreement now little more than a farce in practice.

    The Malaysian-brokered agreement was also widely acclaimed by the international community, as evidenced by the contingent of Manila-based ambassadors representing the Philippines largest aid donors and led by the United States that descended on Kuala Lumpur to witness the signing of the draft agreement; a ceremony which was aborted at the eleventh hour by a restraining order from the Philippine Supreme Court.

    Malaysia has, in the interim and while the Philippines went through a change of government, not said or done anything publicly to indicate it is giving up on the mediating role, frustrating though it naturally is to have brought both sides this close to actual agreement only to see it come apart at the last minute.

    It will be understandably disappointing for us that apart from not acknowledging what Malaysia has already done to help forge peace in Mindanao, President Aquino has in effect dealt us a slap by leaving open the option that Malaysia will be replaced as mediator. If at all he should publicly comment on the matter, he ought to have said his government would seek an agreement with the MILF about who should be the mediator for renewed talks.

    Malaysias role as mediator or any other countrys, for that matter, is contingent upon a joint request from both disputing parties the Philippine government and the MILF. Malaysia cannot take it on even with an official Philippine government invitation unless an invitation is also forthcoming from the MILF.

    Now it seems Malaysia is being put in the uncomfortable position of having its impartiality as peace mediator seemingly compromised by loose talk, through no fault of ours.

    Aquino has in recent days also stated that there is no going back to the aborted draft agreem! ent and blamed his predecessor for foisting that agreement on the country, with less than honourable motivations to boot. There can, of course, be no telling if the previous administration cynically acceded to the draft agreement knowing full well it could not or would not sell it to the Filipino public at large.

    The stance of the Aquino administration stands diametrically opposed to the MILFs, in that renewed talks must now take the draft agreement as the starting point. And the MILF has publicly stated also that it will not agree to Malaysia being replaced as mediator.

    Helping to forge peace in other lands is a noble and worthy cause which we should rightly pursue and persevere in no matter how frustrating and thankless it is. But lest we be seen to be overly keen to remain mediator or worse, to be regarded as partial to either one party, and to avoid being sucked into the treacherous undercurrents of Philippine domestic politics, we must scrupulously not move in any way until a renewed joint invitation from the Philippine government and the MILF is forthcoming.

    http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/17qui/Article/#ixzz0v7sIYWZz
    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

    Beranikah Saiful bersumpah tidak laku zina dengan Farah?

    Saifool, penghias muka depan akhbar pengampu dan penipu apabila perbicaraan Kes Liwat 2 Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim bersambung tak lama dulu. Saiful digambarkan sebagai seorang yang kuat beribadat sehingga dahinya lebam-lebam.

    Ada seorang kawan saya yang menjadi penyokong kuat Umno dulu kini selamanya pernah berkata, tak mungkin Saiful cakap bohong, engkau tengok dahinya hitam kuat sujud.Saya tak menjawab, malas nak layan buang masa dan tenaga. Dalam hati saya kata benggali jual kacang putih dahinya lagi hitam dari si Saiful.

    Lihat lah dahi hitam Saiful, beliau amat memahami hati fikiran Melayu, asalkan dahi hitam, menunjukkan dirinya alim, kuat sembahyang. Kalau Melayu mudah ditipu, maka akan dapat sokongan kuat untuk memburukkan nama Anwar Ibrahim. - Ini satu strategi skript UMNO.

    Hari ini kisah si dahi hitam keluar lagi. Kali ini dakwaan skandal seks (berzina le tu) dengan salah seorang pendakwaraya kes ini iaitu Farah Azlina Latif. Nampaknya Saiful boleh hitamkan dahinya, begitu juga Farah yang bertudung, nampaklah Melayu akan anggap wanita yang bertudung semuanya alim, taubat dan bersih.. sekarang isu kontraversi ini Saiful akan hitamkan Farah jua.

    Tanya lah Saiful beranikah bersumpah dengan al quran di Masjid, dan buktikan diri tiada lakukan zina bersama Farah?? kalau PRU dimenangi oleh PR, dubur Saiful akan hitam akibat dirogol dalam penjara.

    Isu ini mula-mula disiarkan dalam Malaysia Today. Peguam DSAI, Sivarasiah memberitahu wartawan bahawa mereka mempunyai maklumat berhubung dengan dakwaan itu.Tak pasal-pasal, Farah Azlina Latif hari digugurkan dari pasukan pendakwaan.

    Kita boleh tanya anak mamak. Mukhriz botak , adakah artikel RPK hanya 40 % benar? yang lain tipu belaka? Ini lah, bukti bukti menteri di M! alaysia berotak lembu, tiada tahu komen dan tidak menggunakan otak berfikir dengan logik.- Anak Mami

    source : dipetik daripada blog MaGeeMar

    Lu pikiaq mai sendiri..........

    cheers.
    See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?
    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...