UM poll on PKR unreliable and inaccurate, says student leader

Non-stop attacks upon Anwar - a glue which binds Pakatan Malaysia Chronicle

The consult upon PKR's popularity with electorate conducted by a unit at a Universiti Malaya is unreliable, even to a point of being bogus, as many of a respondents were a tyro helpers themselves as well as their friends as well as families vital in places outward of a designated sample area of Klang Valley.

Although a results of this check have not combined significant stroke upon PKR or Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim, it is being used by a BN-controlled mainstream media to conflict PKR forward of a Pakatan Rakyat gathering due next weekend.

"As you have pointed out, it is highly suspicious which this supposed independent unit in a UM would specifically choose to lift out a consult during a PKR approach elections. We do not know if it was commissioned by a Trojan horses which have since been kicked out of PKR or by BN elements for a purpose of inflicting repairs upon Pakatan," PKR clamp boss Tian Chua told Malaysia Chronicle.

Commissioned as a apparatus to be used opposite Pakatan

Zaid quit in a huff, due to form brand new celebration in JanThe UM check was conducted by a Democratic Research as well as Elections Centre during a PKR historic approach elections held last month. It had sought a opinion of 1,124 respondents aged in between twenty as well as 50 from a antithesis strongholds of Cheras, Bandar Tun Razak, Titiwangsa, Ampang, Bukit Bintang, Subang Jaya, Wangsa Maju as well as Lembah Pantai.

Only 35 per cent of a respondents pronounced they would go upon to await a PKR whilst twenty-two per cent pronounced they have been fence-sitters. The check additionally found which 52 per cent of respondents pronounced a PKR celebration predicament had influenced their confidence ! in a cel ebration as well as in its personality Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, whilst 29 per cent thought otherwise. The superfluous nineteen per cent were unsure.

But despite a findings which PKR was losing ground, its supporters have been largely unruffled by a consult results, which have additionally failed to benefit most traction with a average Malaysian.

"Many people see a name Universiti Malaya as well as they know it is controlled by a Umno-BN. There is additionally speculation which Zaid Ibrahim as well as his supporters have been still perplexing all ways as well as means to disprove PKR. One tactic an enemy would adopt would be to elect a supposed independent consult at a time when it is continuously aggressive PKR as well as Anwar. It usually reflects a abyss of their treachery," PKR veteran Eddie Wong told Malaysia Chronicle.

Email whistle-blower


The response of these PKR loyalists seem to be borne out by a email sent by a former tyro personality still involved in a UM tyro physique to Malaysia Chronicle. The tyro personality has asked not to be named, but has minced no difference in describig a demeanour in which a 'survey' was conducted.

According to him, a consult was held but proper monitoring as well as guidance. Student helpers were even allowed to fill out a questionnaires themselves rather than seek votes for genuine replies from electorate within a Klang Valley.

"The investigate management used their students as investigate group. These students who became a belligerent researchers were briefed usually once as well as a consult forms were distributed to them but any stand in checking upon a methodology of collecting interpretation by these students. Based upon these two factors, hence, we hold which there have been a little issues in a investigate which accuracy is in subject due to forgery," a tyro personality told Malaysia Chronicle.

Malaysia Chronicle appends next a email (original text in Bahasa Malaysia) as well as a English interpreta! tion for readers' perusal
Greetings,


Sorry for a interruption. we just wish to share my views. we see many authorities have been regulating UM's recent investigate upon PKR to destabilize DSAI as well as a party


I don't deny which a recent celebration election left an stroke upon a image of celebration as well as DSAI himself. However, greatfully note which from a view of democracy principle, a approach election is good.


Yesterday, we had a contention with a great crony of cave who is additionally a Ex co of ABIM as well as former investigate partner to UM's Dean. Based upon a discussion, we came to conclusion which there is an emanate upon a 'reliability' of a investigate formed upon sure matters:


1) The investigate management used their students as investigate group


2)These students who became a belligerent researchers were briefed usually once as well as a consult forms were distributed to them but any stand in checking upon a methodology
of collecting interpretation by these students


Based upon these two factors, hence, we hold which there have been a little issues in a investigate which accuracy is in subject due to forgery:


1) My crony himself is a respondent


2)In a consult report, it is mentioned which a respondents have been from Klang Valley but there have been a little students, a belligerent researchers, went behind to hometown as well as distributed a consult forms to their relatives who have been staying out of Selangor as well as Klang Valley.


3)There is additionally an claim which students themselves took a consult as well as distributed a consult forms among themselves(as how a little undergraduates do...hehe..)


Salam,

maaf ganggu, sekadar ingin berkongsi pandangan. Saya lihat banyak
pihak mainkan isu kajian UM utk melemahkan DSAI dan Keadilan.

Tanpa saya menafikan bahawa pemilihan keadilan yang lepas memberikan
kesan dari segi imej parti dan DSAI walaupun dari s! egi prin sip
demokrasi ini sebenarnya baik.

Semalam saya berbincang dengan kawan rapat saya yang juga exco ABIM
dan bekas penyelidik kepada Dekan UM yang mengepalai kajian ini.
Berdasarkan perbincangan itu saya dapat konklusikan bahawa berlaku
masalah "reliability" dalam kajian tersebut berdasarkan beberapa
perkara:

1. Badan tersebut menggunakan pelajar mereka sebagai belligerent researcher.

2. Pelajar2 ini yang menjadi belligerent researcher ini hanya diberi
taklimat sekali dan diserahkan borang consult tanpa dipantau respondan
dan motodologi consult yang dilakukan oleh pelajar2 ini.

akibat daripada dua faktor ini, berlaku beberapa isu yang saya rasa
kajian ini tidak tepat kerana berlaku penipuan.

1. kawan saya sendiri menjadi respondan kepada 3 borang survey.

2. dalam laporan consult mengatakan respondan adalah sekitar selangor
dan lembah klang, sedangkan ada pelajar2 ini yang balik ke kampung dan
serahkan kepada orang2 kampung dan sanak saudara yang berada di luar
Selangor dan Lembah Klang.

3. ada juga laporan mengatakan mereka tandakan consult sendiri dan
agih2kan consult dikalangan mereka (spt yang sering dilakukan oleh
segolongan mahasiswa...hehe..)